Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/1795234.1795248acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Participation in design things

Published: 01 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

This paper discusses the design of things. This is done in an attempt to conceptually explore some of the political and practical challenges to participatory design today. Which things, and which participants? The perspective is strategic and conceptual. Two approaches are in focus, participatory design (designing for use before use) and meta-design (designing for design after design). With this framing the challenge for professional design to participate in public controversial things is considered.

References

[1]
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S. 1977. A pattern language. Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford: Oxford, University Press.
[2]
Baker, K. Ribes, D. et al. 2005. Interoperability strategies scientific infrastructure: research and practice. American Society for Information Systems and Technology Proceedings, ASIST 2005.
[3]
Barry, A. Political Machines. Governing a technological society. London. Athlone.
[4]
Beyer, H., Holzblatt, K. 1998. Contextual Design. Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann.
[5]
Borchers, J., Fincher, S., Griffiths, R., Pemberton, L., Siemon, E. 2001. Usability pattern language: Creating a community. AI & Society 15(4):377--385.
[6]
Björgvinsson, E. 2007. Socio-material mediations. Learning, knowing and self-produced media within healthcare, Blekinge Institute of Technology.
[7]
Brown, B & Perry, M. 2002. Of maps and guidebooks. Designing geographical technologies. DIS 2002.
[8]
Buur, J., Binder, T., & Brandt, E. 2000. Taking video beyond 'hard data' in user centered design. Participatory design conference, 2000, New York.
[9]
Büscher, M. Christensen, M. Hansen, K. Mogensen, P. Shapiro, D. 2007. Bottom-up, top-down? Connecting software architecture design with use In Voß, A., Hartswood, M., Ho, K., Procter, R.; Rouncefield, M.; Slack, R.; Büscher, M. Configuring user-designer relations: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Springer Verlag.
[10]
Clark, B. 2007. Design as Sociopolitical Navigation. PhD thesis. University of Southern Denmark.
[11]
Cockburn, Alistair. 2002. Agile Software Development, Addison Wesley.
[12]
Crabtree, A. 2002. Pattern-based Support for Interactive Design in Domestic Settings. DIS 2002.
[13]
Dewey, J. 1927. The Public and its Problems. Holt, New York.
[14]
Edwards, K., Belotti, V. & Newman, N. W. 2003. Stuck in The Middle. The Challenges of User-Centered Design and Evaluation of Infrastructure. CHI 03.
[15]
Ehn, P. 1988. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
[16]
Ehn, P. & Kyng, M. 1991. "Cardboard Computers" in Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems" eds Greenbaum, J. & Kyng, M., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
[17]
Ehn, P & Sjöögren. 1991. From System Description to Script for Action in Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems" eds Greenbaum, J. & Kyng, M., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
[18]
Fensel, Dieter. 2003/2001. Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce - 2nd Edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
[19]
Fischer, G. & Scharff, E. 2000. Meta-Design---Design for Designers. In Proceedings of DIS 2000 pp. 396--405 ACM Press New York USA
[20]
Fischer, G. & Giaccardi, E. 2005. Metadesign. A Framework for End-User Development in H. Lieberman, F. Paternòò, V. Wulf (eds.), End User Development. Empowering People to Flexibly Employ Advanced Information and Communication Technology, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2005.
[21]
Gaver, Bill, Tony Dunne & Elena Pacenti. 1999. Cultural Probes. Interactions 6(1): 21--29.
[22]
Greenbaum, Joan & Morten Kyng, eds. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Work. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[23]
Haraway, D. 1991. Situated Knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective in D. Haraway (ed). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York, Routledge.
[24]
Habraken, N. J., & Gross, M. 1987. Concept design games (Book One: Developing, Book Two: Playing) (Report submitted to the National Science Foundation Engineering Directorate). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Department of Architecture, MIT.
[25]
Henderson, Kathryn. 1999. On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
[26]
Henderson, A. & Kyng K. 1991. There is no place like home - continuing design in use. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 219--240.
[27]
Jones, J C. 1984. Continuous Design and Redesign in Jones, JC, Essays in Design John Wiley and Sons New York USA.
[28]
Junk, R., & Müüllert, N. R. 1981. Zukunftswerkstätten - Wege zur Wiederbelebung der Demokratie.
[29]
Krippendorf K. 1995. Redesigning design. In: Tahkokallio P and Vihma S (eds) Design Pleasure or Responsibility? University of Art and Design, Helsinki, Finland.
[30]
Koulamata 2005. The French Democracy. (http://movies.lionhead.com/movie/11520)
[31]
Krippendorf, K. 2006. The Semantic Turn. A new foundation for design. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.
[32]
Lainer, R. and I. Wagner, 1998. Connecting Qualities of Social Use with Spatial Qualities in Proceedings of CoBuild98, eds. Streitz, N., S. Konomi, and H. Burkhardt, Springer, Heidelberg.
[33]
Latour B. 1999. Pandoras Hope, Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
[34]
Latour, Bruno and Peter Weibel, eds. 2005. Making things public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.
[35]
Lave, J. 1988. Cognition in practice mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[36]
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. 1991, Situated Learning - Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[37]
Leadbeater, C. 2007. We-Think. Profile Books, London.
[38]
Lowood, H. Found technology: Players as Innovators in the making of machinima. In: McPherson, T. (ed.) Digital Media and Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (169--196).
[39]
Mau, B. and Leonard, J. 2004. Massive Change. Phaidon.
[40]
McCullough, M. 2004 Digital ground: Architecture, pervasive computing and environmental knowing. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[41]
Marres, N. 2005. "Issues Spark a Public into Being" in Latour and Weibel (eds.). Making Things Public, MIT Press, Cambridge.
[42]
Nardi, B A. 1993. A Small Matter of Programming. Perspectives on End User Computing. MIT Press, Massachusetts.
[43]
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (Eds.) (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[44]
Pedersen, J. 2007. Protocols of research and design. PhD thesis. IT Iniversity: Copenhagen.
[45]
Redström, Johan. 2008. Re: definitions of use. Design Studies.
[46]
Sanders, E. & Dandavate, U. 1999. Designing for Experiencing: New Tools. Proceedings of the first international Conference on Design & Emotion, Holland.
[47]
Star, Susan L. 1989. The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving. In: Gasser, Les and Michael Huhns, eds. Distributed Artificial Intelligence - Vol. 2. San Francisco Cal: Morgan Kaufman, 37--54.
[48]
Star, S. L. & Ruhleder, K. 1997. Steps toward and an Ecology of infrastructure. Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information System Research.
[49]
Star, S, L. & Bowker, X. 2002. How to Infrastructure. In L. A. Lievrouw, L. A. & Livingstone, S. L. (eds.) The Handbook of New Media, London: SAGE, 151--162.
[50]
Suchman, L. 2000. 'Located Accountabilities in Technology Production', published by the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YN, UK, at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Suchma n-Located-Accountabilities.pdf
[51]
Tonkinwise, C. 2005. Is Design Finished? dematerialisation & changing things In Willis, AM (Ed.) Design Philosophy Papers, Collection Two pp. 20--30 Team D/E/S Publications Ravensbourne Australia
[52]
Tschumi B. 1994. Event Cities (Praxis), MIT Press, London.
[53]
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[54]
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
[55]
von Hippel, Eric. 2005. Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Rehearsing and Performing in Design and Living Labs: Situated, relational, and embodied participatory design roles in partnerships.Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666105(98-111)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Infrastructuring social relations in design and social innovationProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669897(219-221)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Reconfiguring Participatory Design to Resist AI RealismProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669867(31-36)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PDC '08: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008
October 2008
345 pages
ISBN:9780981856100

Sponsors

  • Indiana University: Indiana University

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Indiana University

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2008

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. design
  2. object
  3. participation
  4. public
  5. thing
  6. use

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

PDC '08
Sponsor:
  • Indiana University
PDC '08: Participatory Design Conference
October 1 - 4, 2008
Indiana, Bloomington

Acceptance Rates

PDC '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 15 of 160 submissions, 9%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 49 of 289 submissions, 17%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)101
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 17 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Rehearsing and Performing in Design and Living Labs: Situated, relational, and embodied participatory design roles in partnerships.Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666105(98-111)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Infrastructuring social relations in design and social innovationProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669897(219-221)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Reconfiguring Participatory Design to Resist AI RealismProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669867(31-36)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)"\"But will they listen?\" Learnings from a design after design experiment in civics"Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661541(2173-2182)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2022)Documenting Data Production ProcessesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556236:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Hostile EcologiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555446:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2022)SenseMyStreet: Sensor Commissioning Toolkit for CommunitiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35552156:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Designing for Design-after-Design in a Museum InstallationNordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3546155.3546687(1-11)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Empowering Participation Within Structures of DependencyProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 110.1145/3536169.3537781(75-86)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2022
  • (2022)Tangible ‘Design Non-Proposals’ for Relationship Building in Community-Based Co-Design ProjectsProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 110.1145/3536169.3537780(63-74)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media