Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/1609067.1609091dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Semi-supervised semantic role labeling

Published: 30 March 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Large scale annotated corpora are prerequisite to developing high-performance semantic role labeling systems. Unfortunately, such corpora are expensive to produce, limited in size, and may not be representative. Our work aims to reduce the annotation effort involved in creating resources for semantic role labeling via semi-supervised learning. Our algorithm augments a small number of manually labeled instances with unlabeled examples whose roles are inferred automatically via annotation projection. We formulate the projection task as a generalization of the linear assignment problem. We seek to find a role assignment in the unlabeled data such that the argument similarity between the labeled and unlabeled instances is maximized. Experimental results on semantic role labeling show that the automatic annotations produced by our method improve performance over using hand-labeled instances alone.

References

[1]
Collin F. Baker, Michael Ellsworth, and Katrin Erk. 2007. SemEval-2007 Task 19: Frame Semantic Structure Extraction. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, pages 99--104, Prague, Czech Republic.
[2]
R. P. Brent. 1973. Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[3]
Ted Briscoe, John Carroll, and Rebecca Watson. 2006. The Second Release of the RASP System. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Interactive Presentation Sessions, pages 77--80, Sydney, Australia.
[4]
J. A. Bullinaria and J. P. Levy. 2007. Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior Research Methods, 39:510--526.
[5]
George B. Dantzig. 1963. Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
[6]
R.-E. Fan, K.-W. Chang, C.-J. Hsieh, X.-R. Wang, and C.-J. Lin. 2008. Lib Linear: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:1871--1874.
[7]
Charles J. Fillmore, Christopher R. Johnson, and Miriam R. L. Petruck. 2003. Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16:235--250.
[8]
Lev Finkelstein, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Yossi Matias, Ehud Rivlin, Zach Solan, Gadi Wolfman, and Eytan Ruppin. 2002. Placing search in context: The concept revisited. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 20(1):116--131.
[9]
Jerome H. Friedman. 1996. Another approach to polychotomous classification. Technical report. Department of Statistics, Stanford University.
[10]
Pascale Fung and Benfeng Chen. 2004. BiFrameNet: Bilingual frame semantics resources construction by cross-lingual induction. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 931--935, Geneva, Switzerland.
[11]
Hagen Fürstenau. 2008. Enriching frame semantic resources with dependency graphs. In Proceedings of the 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marrakech, Morocco.
[12]
Daniel Gildea and Dan Jurafsky. 2002. Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 28:3:245--288.
[13]
Andrew Gordon and Reid Swanson. 2007. Generalizing semantic role annotations across syntactically similar verbs. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 192--199, Prague, Czech Republic.
[14]
Richard Johansson and Pierre Nugues. 2006. A FrameNet-based semantic role labeler for Swedish. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Main Conference Poster Sessions, pages 436--443, Sydney, Australia.
[15]
Richard Johansson and Pierre Nugues. 2008. The effect of syntactic representation on semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 393--400, Manchester, UK.
[16]
Beth Levin. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press.
[17]
Alessandro Moschitti, Paul Morarescu, and Sanda Harabagiu. 2003. Open-domain information extraction via automatic semantic labeling. In Proceedings of FLAIRS 2003, pages 397--401, St. Augustine, FL.
[18]
E. Noreen. 1989. Computer-intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
[19]
Sebastian Padó and Katrin Erk. 2005. To cause or not to cause: Cross-lingual semantic matching for paraphrase modelling. In Proceedings of the EUROLAN Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Knowledge Induction, pages 23--30, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
[20]
Sebastian Padó and Mirella Lapata. 2006. Optimal constituent alignment with edge covers for semantic projection. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1161--1168, Sydney, Australia.
[21]
Martha Palmer. Dan Gildea, and Paul Kingsbury. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71--106.
[22]
Marco Pennacchiotti, Diego De Cao, Roberto Basili, Danilo Croce, and Michael Roth. 2008. Automatic induction of FrameNet lexical units. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 457--465, Honolulu, Hawaii.
[23]
Dan Shen and Mirella Lapata. 2007. Using semantic roles to improve question answering. In Proceedings of the joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 12--21, Prague, Czech Republic.
[24]
Mihai Surdeanu, Sanda Harabagiu, John Williams, and Paul Aarseth. 2003. Using predicate-argument structures for information extraction. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 8--15, Sapporo, Japan.
[25]
Robert S. Swier and Suzanne Stevenson. 2004. Unsupervised semantic role labelling. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 95--102. Bacelona. Spain.
[26]
Marta Tatu and Dan Moldovan. 2005. A semantic approach to recognizing textual entailment. In Proceedings of the joint Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 371--378, Vancouver, BC.

Cited By

View all
  • (2014)Learning representations for weakly supervised natural language processing tasksComputational Linguistics10.1162/COLI_a_0016740:1(85-120)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2014
  • (2014)Frame-semantic parsingComputational Linguistics10.1162/COLI_a_0016340:1(9-56)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2014
  • (2013)Mining semantics for culturomicsProceedings of the 2013 international workshop on Mining unstructured big data using natural language processing10.1145/2513549.2513551(3-10)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2013
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
EACL '09: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
March 2009
905 pages

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 30 March 2009

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Acceptance Rates

EACL '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 100 of 360 submissions, 28%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 100 of 360 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)47
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2014)Learning representations for weakly supervised natural language processing tasksComputational Linguistics10.1162/COLI_a_0016740:1(85-120)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2014
  • (2014)Frame-semantic parsingComputational Linguistics10.1162/COLI_a_0016340:1(9-56)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2014
  • (2013)Mining semantics for culturomicsProceedings of the 2013 international workshop on Mining unstructured big data using natural language processing10.1145/2513549.2513551(3-10)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2013
  • (2013)Guided learning for role discovery (GLRD)Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining10.1145/2487575.2487620(113-121)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2013
  • (2012)RolXProceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining10.1145/2339530.2339723(1231-1239)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2012
  • (2012)Towards semi-supervised brazilian portuguese semantic role labelingProceedings of the 10th international conference on Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language10.1007/978-3-642-28885-2_24(210-217)Online publication date: 17-Apr-2012
  • (2011)Filling the gapProceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning10.5555/2018936.2018959(200-209)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2011
  • (2011)Semi-supervised frame-semantic parsing for unknown predicatesProceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Volume 110.5555/2002472.2002648(1435-1444)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2011
  • (2010)Evaluating FrameNet-style semantic parsingProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters10.5555/1944566.1944673(928-936)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2010
  • (2010)Open-domain semantic role labeling by modeling word spansProceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics10.5555/1858681.1858780(968-978)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2010
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media