Perceived-Social Isolation and Cyberbullying Involvement: : The Role of Online Social Interaction
Pages 1 - 14
Abstract
Although perceived social isolation (i.e., feelings of loneliness and a perceived lack of social support) has been shown to be associated with the involvement in cyberbullying behaviors, little is known about the mediating mechanisms underlying this relationship. This study tested the mediating role of a preference for online social interaction in the association between perceived social isolation and cyberbullying involvement. Our findings demonstrated that increasing levels of perceived social isolation were associated with enhanced levels of preference for online social interaction, which in turn were associated with a higher probability of being involved in cyberbullying. These findings contribute significantly to the literature on both cyberbullying involvement and problematic internet use, and provide suggestions for practical applications.
References
[1]
Al Qudah, M. F., Al-Barashdi, H. S., Hassan, E. M. A. H., Albursan, I. S., Heilat, M. Q., Bakhiet, S. F. A., & Al-Khadher, M. A. (2020). Psychological security, psychological loneliness, and age as the predictors of cyber-bullying among university students. Community Mental Health Journal, 56(3), 393–403. 31522350.
[2]
Arató, N., Zsidó, A. N., Rivnyák, A., Péley, B., & Lábadi, B. (2022). Risk and protective factors in cyberbullying: The role of family, social support and emotion regulation. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 4(2), 160–173.
[3]
Bacher, J., Wenzig, K., & Vogler, M. (2004). SPSS TwoStep Cluster-a first evaluation.
[4]
Barlett, C. P. (2015). Anonymously hurting others online: The effect of anonymity on cyberbullying frequency. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(2), 70–79.
[5]
Barlett, C. P., & Gentile, D. A. (2012). Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(2), 123–135.
[6]
Barliñska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent by- standers: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 37–51.
[7]
Bastiaensens, S., Pabian, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2016). From normative influence to social pressure: How relevant others affect whether bystanders join in cyberbullying. Social Development, 25(1), 193–211.
[8]
Beard, K. W., & Wolf, E. M. (2001). Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 377–383. 11710263.
[9]
Benassi, M., Garofalo, S., Ambrosini, F., Sant’Angelo, R. P., Raggini, R., De Paoli, G., Ravani, C., Giovagnoli, S., Orsoni, M., & Piraccini, G. (2020). Using two-step cluster analysis and latent class cluster analysis to classify the cognitive heterogeneity of cross-diagnostic psychiatric inpatients. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1085. 32587546.
[10]
Boffo, M., Mannarini, S., & Munari, C. (2012). Exploratory structure equation modeling of the UCLA loneliness scale: A contribution to the Italian adaptation. TPM. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 19(4), 345–363.
[11]
Braithwaite, V., Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, J. (2009). Workplace bullying and victimization: The influence of organizational context, shame and pride. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 13(2), 71–94.
[12]
Brewer, G., & Kerslake, J. (2015). Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 255–260.
[13]
Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Melotti, G., Galli, S., & Genta, M. L. (2012). Predictors of victimisation across direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 17, 375–388. .704684 10.1080/13632752.2012
[14]
Brochado, S., Soares, S., & Fraga, S. (2017). A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying prevalence among adolescents. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 18(5), 523–531. 27053102.
[15]
Bullo, A., & Schulz, P. J. (2022). Do peer and parental norms influence media content-induced cyber aggression? Computers in Human Behavior, 129, 107136.
[16]
Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M., Berntson, G. G., Nouriani, B., & Spiegel, D. (2006). Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6), 1054–1085.
[17]
Camerini, A. L., Marciano, L., Carrara, A., & Schulz, P. J. (2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Telematics and Informatics, 49, 101362.
[18]
Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive–behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 553–575.
[19]
Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30(6), 625–648.
[20]
Chen, L., Ho, S. S., & Lwin, M. O. (2017). A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1194–1213.
[21]
Chu, X., Li, Y., Wang, P., Zeng, P., & Lei, L. (2021). Social support and cyberbullying for university students: The mediating role of internet addiction and the moderating role of stress. Current Psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 1–9.
[22]
Chung, J. E. (2013). Social interaction in online support groups: Preference for online social interaction over offline social interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1408–1414.
[23]
Clark, J. L., Algoe, S. B., & Green, M. C. (2018). Social network sites and well-being: The role of social connection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 32–37.
[24]
Cornwell, E. Y., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(1), 31–48. 19413133.
[25]
Dang, J., & Liu, L. (2020). When peer norms work? Coherent groups facilitate normative influences on cyber aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 46(6), 559–569. 32749734.
[26]
Eden, S., Heinman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, T. (2014). Bully versus victim on the Internet: The correlation with emotional-social characteristics. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 699–713.
[27]
Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G., & Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168–181.
[28]
Gao, L., Liu, J., Wang, W., Yang, J., Wang, P., & Wang, X. (2020). Moral disengagement and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: Student-student relationship and gender as moderators. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105119.
[29]
Gelbard, R., Goldman, O., & Spiegler, I. (2007). Investigating diversity of clustering methods: An empirical comparison. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 63(1), 155–166.
[30]
Giumetti, G. W., & Kowalski, R. M. (2022). Cyberbullying via social media and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 101314. 35313180.
[31]
Gül, H., Fưrat, S., Sertçelik, M., Gül, A., Gürel, Y., & Kưlưç, B. G. (2019). Cyberbullying among a clinical adolescent sample in Turkey: Effects of problematic smartphone use, psychiatric symptoms, and emotion regulation difficulties. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(4), 547–557.
[32]
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. 24188158.
[33]
Hsu, H. C. (2020). Typologies of loneliness, isolation and living alone are associated with psychological well-being among older adults in Taipei: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9181. 33302603.
[34]
Kardefelt-Winther, D. (2014). A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 351–354.
[35]
Kent, P., Jensen, R. K., & Kongsted, A. (2014). A comparison of three clustering methods for finding subgroups in MRI, SMS or clinical data: SPSS TwoStep Cluster analysis, Latent Gold and SNOB. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 1–14. 25272975.
[36]
Kim, J., LaRose, R., & Peng, W. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 451–454. 19514821.
[37]
Kokkinos, C. M., & Antoniadou, N. (2019). Cyber-bullying and cyber-victimization among undergraduate student teachers through the lens of the General Aggression Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 59–68.
[38]
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. 24512111.
[39]
Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & McCord, A. (2019). A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 20–32.
[40]
Kwok, S. W. H., Lee, P. H., & Lee, R. L. T. (2017). Smart device use and perceived physical and psychosocial outcomes among Hong Kong adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(2), 205. 28218719.
[41]
Leung, L. (2011). Loneliness, social support, and preference for online social interaction: The mediating effects of identity experimentation online among children and adolescents. Chinese Journal of Communication, 4(4), 381–399.
[42]
Lieberman, A., & Schroeder, J. (2020). Two social lives: How differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 16–21. 31386968.
[43]
Lo Cricchio, M. G., García-Poole, C., te Brinke, L. W., Bianchi, D., & Menesini, E. (2021). Moral disengagement and cyberbullying involvement: A systematic review. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 271–311.
[44]
Martínez, J., Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. J., & Zych, I. (2020). Bullying and cyberbullying in adolescents from disadvantaged areas: Validation of questionnaires; prevalence rates; and relationship to self-esteem, empathy and social skills. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6199. 32859073.
[45]
Martínez-Ferrer, B., Moreno, D., & Musitu, G. (2018). Are adolescents engaged in the problematic use of social networking sites more involved in peer aggression and victimization? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 801. 29896139.
[46]
Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 659–671.
[47]
Mueller-Coyne, J., Voss, C., & Turner, K. (2022). The impact of loneliness on the six dimensions of online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 5, 100169.
[48]
Nowland, R., Necka, E. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2018). Loneliness and social internet use: Pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1), 70–87. 28937910.
[49]
Olenik-Shemesh, D., & Heiman, T. (2014). Exploring cyberbullying among primary children in relation to social support, loneliness, self-efficacy, and well-being. Child Welfare, 93(5), 27–46.
[50]
Olenik-Shemesh, D., Heiman, T., & Eden, S. (2015). Bystanders’ behavior in cyberbullying episodes: Active and passive patterns in the context of personal–socio-emotional factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(1), 23–48. 25948644.
[51]
Olenik-Shemesh, D., Heiman, T., & Eden, S. (2017). Bystanders’ behavior in cyberbullying episodes: Active and passive patterns in the context of personal–socio-emotional factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(1), 23–48. 25948644.
[52]
Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H. (2014). Using the theory of planned behaviour to under- stand cyberbullying: The importance of beliefs for developing interventions. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(4), 463–477. 10.1080/17405629.2013.858626
[53]
Piccoli, V., Carnaghi, A., Grassi, M., Stragà, M., & Bianchi, M. (2020). Cyberbullying through the lens of social influence: Predicting cyberbullying perpetration from perceived peer-norm, cyberspace regulations and ingroup processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 260–273.
[54]
Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2020). Behavior during cyberbullying episodes: Initial validation of a new self‐report scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 22–29. 30690730.
[55]
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. 15641418.
[56]
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. 18697684.
[57]
Py¿alski, J. (2012). From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: Typology of the phenomenon. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3–4), 305–317.
[58]
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
[59]
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/.
[60]
Sahin, M. (2012). The relationship between the cyberbullying/cybervictmization and loneliness among adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 834–837.
[61]
Schade, E. C., Voracek, M., & Tran, U. S. (2021). The Nexus of the Dark Triad Personality Traits With Cyberbullying, Empathy, and Emotional Intelligence: A Structural-Equation Modeling Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 659282. https://doi.otg/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659282. 34149547.
[62]
Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining Power and Sample Size for Simple and Complex Mediation Models. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386.
[63]
Sestito, L. A., Cozzolino, M. D., Menna, P., Ragozini, G., & Sica, L. S. (2008). Contribution to the validation of Italian version of the Social Support Scale by Susan Harter. Bollettino Di Psicologia Applicata, 254, 33-43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271845984_Contribution_to_the_validation_of_Itali an_version_of_the_Social_Support_Scale_by_Susan_Harter
[64]
Tosuntaº, B., Karadađ, E., Emirtekin, E., Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Sofalizing and its relationship with social media addiction and psychosocial factors: A new phenomenon among emerging adults. The Social Science Journal, 1–13.
[65]
Trajtenberg, N., Dodel, M., Sanchez De Ribera, O., Cabello, P., & Claro, M. (2021). Online and offline victimisation: A cluster analysis of adolescent victims of bullying and cyber-bullying in Chile. Journal of Children and Media, 15(4), 568–587.
[66]
Valdés-Cuervo, A. A., Alcántar-Nieblas, C., Parra-Pérez, L. G., Torres-Acuña, G. M., Álvarez-Montero, F. J., & Reyes-Sosa, H. (2021). Unique and interactive effects of guilt and sympathy on bystander aggressive defender intervention in cyberbullying: The mediation of self-regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106842.
[67]
Varghese, M. E., & Pistole, M. C. (2017). College student cyberbullying: Self‐esteem, depression, loneliness, and attachment. Journal of College Counseling, 20(1), 7–21.
[68]
Vismara, M., Girone, N., Conti, D., Nicolini, G., & Dell’Osso, B. (2022). The current status of Cyberbullying research: A short review of the literature. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 46, 101152.
[69]
Wachs, S., Vazsonyi, A. T., Wright, M. F., & Ksinan Jiskrova, G. (2020). Cross-national associations among cyberbullying victimization, self-esteem, and Internet addiction: Direct and indirect effects of alexithymia. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1368. 32595579.
[70]
Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2011). Cyberbullying: Predicting victimisation and perpetration. Children & Society, 25(1), 59–72. 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009. 00260.x.
[71]
Wang, X., Qiao, Y., Li, W., & Dong, W. (2021). How is Online Disinhibition Related to Adolescents’ Cyberbullying Perpetration? Empathy and Gender as Moderators. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 02724316211064515. Advance online publication.
[72]
Zhang, D., Huebner, E. S., & Tian, L. (2020). Longitudinal associations among neuroticism, depression, and cyberbullying in early adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106475.
[73]
Zhang, Y., Qin, X., & Ren, P. (2018). Adolescents’ academic engagement mediates the association between Internet addiction and academic achievement: The moderating effect of classroom achievement norm. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 299–307.
[74]
Zhu, C., Huang, S., Evans, R., & Zhang, W. (2021). Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: A comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 634909. 33791270.
[75]
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. 2280326.
Index Terms
- Perceived-Social Isolation and Cyberbullying Involvement: The Role of Online Social Interaction
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
How do victims react to cyberbullying on social networking sites? The influence of previous cyberbullying victimization experiences
Cyberbullying victims reported more antisocial bystander behaviors than nonvictims.Gender influenced teenagers' bystander reaction strategies on SNSs.Female victims performed more prosocial bystander behaviors than male victims.Teenagers' online social ...
Loneliness, parent-child communication and cyberbullying victimization among Spanish youths
Cyberbullying has been recognized as an important risk factor for mental health. Few studies have analyzed relationships between family variables and cyberbullying victimization. This ex post facto study analyze the relationships between loneliness, ...
Cyberbullying victimization in higher education
Few studies have analyzed cyberbullying victimization among university students in comparison to research conducted in other educational levels. The main purpose was to analyze the associations between the cyberbullying victimization and social and ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2022.
Publisher
IGI Global
United States
Publication History
Published: 16 November 2022
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025