Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Computational Communication Research
  4. Volume 2, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9085
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Tremendous growth in the communication discipline during the past century has raised fundamental questions about what it means to study human communication. This project reports an attempt at answering such questions by exploring the themes that animate communication scholarship over time and across journals sponsored by different scholarly organizations. We used topic modeling to examine the abstracts of more than 20,000 articles across 22 journals from their beginnings through 2015. The results offer insights about the state and evolution of communication scholarship. Research has evolved from being predominately focused on pedagogy to examining a wide variety of phenomena that mark an increasingly diverse field. The role of scholarly organizations in contributing to disciplinary fragmentation is considered, as well as the field’s relatively limited focus on underlying and contextually-transcendent processes in favor of specific communication contexts.

© 2020 Amsterdam University Press
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2020.2.004.RAIN
2020-10-01
2024-11-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/26659085/2/2/04_CCR2020.2_RAIN.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2020.2.004.RAIN&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Benoit, K.(2018). quanteda package for R [software]. Retrieved from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/quanteda/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Benson, T. W. (Ed.). (1985). Speech communication in the 20th century. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Berelson, B.(1959). The state of communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 23, 1-2. doi:10.1086/266840
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D.(2010). What is communication science? In C. R.Berger, M. E.Roloff, & D. R.Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (pp. 3-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Blei, D. M.(2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55, 77-84. doi:10.1145/2133806.2133826
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Borgman, C. L., & Rice, R. E.(1992). The convergence of information science and communication: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 397-411. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097‑4571(199207)43:6<397:AID‑ASI1>3.0.CO;2‑M
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bryant, J., & Miron, D.(2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 662-704. doi:10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2004.tb02650.x
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bryant, J., & Pribanic-Smith, E. J.(2010). A historical overview of research in communication science. In C. R.Berger, M. E.Roloff, & D. R.Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (pp. 21-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C.(2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68, 254-266. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy003
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chung, C. J., Barnett, G. A., Kim, K., & Lackaff, D.(2013). An analysis on communication theory and discipline. Scientometrics, 95, 985-1002. doi:10.1007/s11192‑012‑0869‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Craig, R. T.(1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119-161. doi:10.1111/j.1468‑2885.1999.tb00355.x
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Delia, J. G.(1987). Communication research: A history. In C. R.Berger and S. H.Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of Communication Science (pp. 20–98). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dennis, E. E., & Wartella, E.(1996). American communication research: The remembered history. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Eadie, W. F.(2011). Stories we tell: Fragmentation and convergence in communication disciplinary history. Review of Communication, 11, 161-176. doi:10.1080/15358593.2011.578257
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Feeley, T. H.(2008). A bibliometric analysis of communication journals from 2002 to 2005. Human Communication Research, 34, 505-520. doi:10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2008.00330.x
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Funkhouser, E. T.(1996). The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research, 22, 563-574. doi:10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1996.tb00379.x
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Griffin, D. J., Bolkan, S., Holmgren, J. L., & Tutzauer, F.(2016). Central journals and authors in communication using a publication network. Scientometrics, 106, 91–104. doi:10.1007/s11192‑015‑1774‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Grün, B., & Hornik, K.(2011). topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40, 1-30. doi:10.18637/jss.v040.i13
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Günther, E., & Domahidi, E.(2017). What communication scholar write about: An analysis of 80 years of research in high-impact journals. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3051-3071.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Huskey, R., Bue, A. C., Eden, A., Grall, C., Meshi, D., Prena, K., ... & Wilcox, S.(2020). Marr’s tri-level framework integrates biological explanation across communication subfields. Journal of Communication, 70, 356-378. doi:10.1093/joc/jqaa007
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Keating, D. M., Richards, A. S., Palomares, N. A., Banas, J. A., Joyce, N., & Rains, S. A.(2019). Titling practices and their implications in communication research 1970-2010: Cutesy cues carry citation consequences. Communication Research.Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0093650219887025
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Keating, D. M., & Totzkay, D.(2019). We do publish (conceptual) replications (sometimes): Publication trends in communication science, 2007-2016. Annals of the International Communication Association,43, 225-239. doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1632218
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Knower, F. H.(1935). Graduate theses ‒ an index of graduate work in the field of speech from 1902 to 1934. Speech Monographs, 2, 1-49. doi:10.1080/03637753509374827
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Knower, F. H.(1936). Graduate theses ‒ an index of graduate work in the field of speech ‒ II. Speech Monographs, 3, 1-20. doi:10.1080/03637753609374839
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Levine, T. R.(2010). Rankings and trends in citation patterns of communication journals. Communication Education, 59, 41-51. doi:10.1080/03634520903296825
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Levine, T. R.(2013). Quantitative communication research: Review, trends, and critique. Review of Communication Research, 1, 69-84.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Leydesdorff, L., & Park, H. W.(2007). The Journal of Communication and the field of communication studies: Mapping scientific communication online. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lowery, S., & DeFleur, M.(1995). Milestones in mass communication research. White Plains, NY: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Maier, D., Waldherr, A., Miltner, P., Wiedemann, G., Niekler, A., Keinert, A. ... & Adam, S.(2018). Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures, 12, 93-118. doi:10.1080/19312458.2018.1430754
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Miller, G. R.(1983). Taking stock of a discipline. Journal of Communication, 33, 31-41. doi:10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1983.tb02403.x
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mohr, J. W., & Bogdanov, P.(2013). Introduction ‒ topic models: What they are and why they matter. Poetics, 41, 545-569. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2013.10.001
     [Google Scholar]
  32. National Communication Association. (2016). C-brief: Conferred degrees in communication, 1970-2014. Retrieved from: https://www.natcom.org/sites/default/files/publications/NCA_C-Brief_2016_May_I.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  33. O'Neill, J.(1915). The national association. Quarterly Journal of Public Speaking, 1, 51-58. doi:10.1080/00335631509360458
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Palomares, N. A., Bradac, J. J., & Kellermann, K.(2006). Conversational topic along a continuum of perspectives: Conceptual issues. Annals of the International Communication Association, 30, 45-97. doi:10.1080/23808985.2006.11679055
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Peng, T-Q., Zhang, L., Zhong, Z-J, Zhu, J. JH.(2012). Mapping the landscape of Internet studies. Text mining of social science journal articles 2000-2009. New Media & Society, 15, 644-664. doi:10.1177/1461444812462846
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Rice, R. E., Borgman, C. L., & Reeves, B.(1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977–1985: Cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research, 15, 256-283. doi:10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1988.tb00184.x
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Rice, R. E., Chapin, J., Pressman, R., Park, S., & Funkhouser, E.(1996). What’s in a name? Bibliometric analysis of 40 years of the Journal of Broadcasting (& Electronic Media). Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 511-539. doi:10.1080/08838159609364373
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Rogers, E. M.(1994). History of communication study. New York: Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Rogers, E. M.(1999). Anatomy of the two subdisciplines of communication study. Human Communication Research, 25, 618-631. doi:10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1999.tb00465.x
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Rogers, E. M., & Chaffee, S. H.(1983). Communication as an academic discipline: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 33, 18-30. doi:10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1983.tb02402.x
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Schramm, W.L.(1997). The beginnings of communication study in America: A personal memoir (S. H. Chaffee & E. M.Rogers, Eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Sherry, J. L.(2004). Media effects theory and the nature/nurture debate: A historical overview and directions for future research. Media Psychology, 6, 83-109. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_4
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Song, H., Eberl, J.-M., & Eisele, O.(2020). Less fragmented than we thought? Toward clarification of a subdisciplinary linkage in communication science, 2010-2019. Journal of Communication, 70, 310-334. doi:10.1093/joc/jqaa009
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Splichal, S., & Mance, B.(2018). Paradigm(s) lost? Islands of critical media research in communication journals. Journal of Communication, 68, 399-414. doi:10.1093/joc/jqx018
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Stephen, T.(1999). Computer‐assisted concept analysis of HCR's first 25 years. Human Communication Research, 25, 498-513. doi:10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1999.tb00458.x
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Swanson, D. L.(1993). Fragmentation, the field, and the future. Journal of Communication, 43, 163-173. doi:10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01317.x
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomas, G. L.(1968). Graduate degree practices in speech. The Speech Teacher, 17, 319-328. doi:10.1080/03634526809377701
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Walter, N., Cody, M. J., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J.(2018). The ebb and flow of communication research: Seven decades of publication trends and research priorities. Journal of Communication, 68, 424-440. doi:10.1093/joc/jqx015
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Wartella, E.(1996). The history reconsidered. In E. E.Dennis & E.Wartella (Eds.), American communication research: The remembered history (pp. 169–180). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Weaver, C. H.(1977). A history of the International Communication Association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 1, 607-618. doi:10.1080/23808985.1977.11923710
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Wickham, H.(2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wiemann, J. M., Pingree, S., & Hawkins, R. P.(1988). Fragmentation in the field ‒ and the movement toward integration in communication science. Human Communication Research, 15, 304-310. doi:10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1988.tb00186.x
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Woolbert, C. H.(1923). The teaching of speech as an academic discipline. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 9, 1-18. doi:10.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2020.2.004.RAIN
Loading
The State and Evolution of Communication Research
CCR 2, 203 (2020); https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2020.2.004.RAIN
/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2020.2.004.RAIN
/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2020.2.004.RAIN
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): communication; journal articles; latent Dirichlet allocation; scholarship; topic modeling

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error