Open AccessCommunication

A 0.5 MP, 3D-Stacked, Voltage-Domain Global Shutter Image Sensor with NIR QE Enhancement, Event Detection Modes, and 90 dB Dynamic Range

Adi Xhakoni

ams OSRAM, Borsbeeksebrug 36, 2600 Antwerp, Belgium

Sensors 2023, 23(23), 9448; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239448

Submission received: 18 October 2023 / Revised: 20 November 2023 / Accepted: 21 November 2023 / Published: 27 November 2023

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Special Issue on the 2023 International Image Sensor Workshop (IISW2023))

Download

Browse Figures

Figure 1
Global shutter sensor (left) exposing all pixels at the same time vs. rolling shutter sensor (right) exposing rows of pixels sequentially. "> Figure 2
CIS silicon (left) stacked on top of logic silicon (right) via hybrid bonding interconnects. "> Figure 3
The added light-scattering structure increases QE in both visible and NIR wavelengths. "> Figure 4
After natural shrinkage of digital blocks from technology node scaling, special layout techniques were used to shrink the row drivers and analog parts of ADC. "> Figure 5
Analog part of the ramp ADC using the embedded kickback cancellation circuit, which reduces the area of the ramp capacitance by a factor of four times. "> Figure 6
Voltage-domain GS pixel and simplified HDR timing. C2 stores overflow signal (at high light) or reset signal (at low light). The reset level of overflow is read during row readout. Only two capacitors are then needed to store the reset low light, low-light signal, overflow signal, and reset of overflow. CDS at low light is maintained, allowing low noise in dark conditions. Overflow happens during short T1 at FD, avoiding the need for a large overflow cap and reducing DSNU and dark current. "> Figure 7
During low-light conditions (left plot), no signal overflows during T1. During mid-light conditions (mid plot), overflow happens just after T1 starts. During high-light conditions (right plot), overflow happens before T1 starts. "> Figure 8
~90 dB DR is achieved with T0/T1 = 16x. A larger DR is possible by trading off with an SNR dip. Part of the data from the plot is simulated as a full char report and is not available for the current product in HDR mode. "> Figure 9
Image captures at 12-bit 1× gain with same light intensity at 1 ms exposure. (a) Standard mode; (b) HDR mode. "> Figure 10
User-programmable event detection mode operating at 1 fps. When an event is detected, the sensor switches to another user-defined mode (e.g., 120 fps, 10 bits, 0.5 MP). "> Figure 11
A 2.3 mm × 2.8 mm CSP version where A and B denote the optical size and the total package size, respectively. ">

Versions Notes

Abstract

We introduce a compact voltage-domain global shutter CMOS image sensor for a wide range of applications including consumer, IoT, and industrial applications. With 0.5 MP and 2.79 µm pixels packed in a die size of only 2.3 mm × 2.8 mm, the sensor achieves more than 92% quantum efficiency (QE) in the visible wavelength and more than 36% at near-infrared (940 nm) all while drawing a mere 20 mW at a 10-bit, 30-frame-per-second operational mode. In this article, we focus on the architecture of the sensor and the design challenges encountered to fit all the necessary circuitry in such a limited footprint. Moreover, we detail the new solutions we have developed to meet the demanding specifications of low-power operation and high dynamic range (HDR).

Keywords:

image sensors; NIR; global shutter; voltage domain; HDR; AR/VR; eye tracking; ADC; low power

1. Introduction

Many fields, including machine vision, robotics, consumer, etc., require global shutter image sensors due to the need for image artifact reduction and their capability to synchronize with a pulsed illuminator. The latter is very important for power consumption since in global shutter sensors, all pixels are exposed at the same time, as shown in Figure 1 [1]. In contrast, rolling shutter pixels have rows exposing sequentially, therefore the illuminator needs to stay active until all the rows finish exposing, using unnecessary power, and potentially causing overheating of the system. Some works have proposed using illuminators with addressable light patterns, which follow the row exposure of rolling shutter sensors [2], partially improving the system’s power consumption. However, that comes at the expense of increased complexity and cost of the illuminator and image artifacts caused by fast-moving objects in the scene or camera movement. It is therefore crucial for sensors combined with a pulse illuminator to employ global shutter technology to keep the power consumption and cost of the system under control. Among global shutter technologies, voltage [3] and charge domains [4] are the most used ones. For low power consumption, voltage domain has the edge due to its possibility to be combined with backside illumination [5] and near-infrared (NIR) quantum efficiency enhancement light-scattering structures [6,7,8] while maintaining good parasitic light sensitivity. High QE is crucial for the illuminator to have low power consumption.

Focusing on the target application of the reported design being AR/VR glasses, other key requirements are low system power (to reduce the weight of the battery and/or increase the charging intervals) and miniaturized silicon size (to fit within the thin frame of the glasses) [9]. Furthermore, HDR operation is especially required for world-facing cameras. To summarize, the ideal image sensor for AR/VR consumer applications is a global shutter with low system and sensor power consumption and a very small size.

To our knowledge, the combination of the above-mentioned specs has not been previously reported in a single sensor.

To satisfy those requirements, we designed a 3D-stacked, 0.5 MP image sensor with 2.79 µm voltage-domain GS pixels with a packaged sensor footprint of only 2.3 mm × 2.8 mm. On top of the above features, we added smart event detection modes and single-shot HDR operation.

More details on this sensor are available in the following sections: Section 2 describes the sensor architecture, focusing on the logic layer; Section 3 introduces the high dynamic range technique, and Section 4 talks about the smart event detection mode. Finally, the summary and conclusions are available in Section 5.

This paper is an invited journal extension of our conference paper [6].

2. Sensor Architecture

To meet the challenging requirements of footprint and power for consumer applications, we designed an image sensor with the architecture depicted in Figure 2. Wafer-to-wafer 3D stacking with high-density hybrid bonding (HB) allows the placement of the backside-illuminated (BSI) pixel array on top of the logic die, which acts like a readout and drives circuitry for the pixel array. The pixel array is connected to the logic die via HB at the column and row level. No per-pixel HB interconnect is necessary since the pixel uses only the top silicon layer. The pixel array uses 45 nm CMOS optimized for optical performance and employs NMOS-only transistors. The logic die is a standard 40 nm CMOS process optimized for low power.

To increase the QE, we used a special scattering layer on top of the pixel to extend the photon path within the pixel without increasing the EPI thickness (left drawing of Figure 3). Combined with BSI technology, QE levels of more than 90% are achieved in the visible range and >36% in the 940 nm range. A comparison of the QE achieved in this work and that of a charge-domain GS sensor from ams OSRAM is depicted in Figure 3. QE improves by almost an order of magnitude at 940nm (right drawing of Figure 3). The light-scattering structure is quite effective when combined with a voltage-domain global shutter pixel since it increases the QE without impacting the parasitic light sensitivity (PLS) [7,10].

2.1. Footprint Reduction

We decided to keep the ADC pitch the same as the pixel pitch to avoid potential column FPN issues. This posed a challenge in the row driver design, as we needed to keep the sensor footprint within specifications. However, by improving the row driver architecture and using seven metal layers made possible by the stacked technology, we were able to achieve an exceptionally narrow row driver width of only 40 µm. The thick last metal in particular made an impressive difference in power distribution across the narrow row driver area. Due to that, we were able to reduce the width of the row driver by more than 10 times compared to our previous sensors using traditional frontside-illuminated (FSI) technology [3,11,12,13]. Additionally, we split the row driver into two parts (left and right of the array) to further reduce its width and to have a more symmetrical placement of the readout blocks.

These improvements in architecture, layout, and technology node scaling allowed us to create a sensor footprint that is mostly dominated by the pixel array rather than readout silicon. This is a significant improvement over previous designs, where the readout silicon could occupy a significant portion of the sensor area [3]. This is even more critical when the sensor resolution decreases since less room is available for the readout circuits, while standard interfaces (e.g., MIPI CSI2) are still expected by the customers/applications.

Figure 4 depicts the area usage of the logic blocks. Since the digital cells make use of the scaled technology node for power and area reduction, the pressure was on the analog blocks to keep up.

The simplified circuitry of the analog readout part is depicted in Figure 5. The column bias circuitry was placed in the pixel silicon layer to spare the logic silicon area and to improve the noise performance. The traditional column sample and hold circuitry [11] were removed to reduce the area and improve noise performance, with column analog and digital correlated double sampling operations performed directly in the ramp ADC.

To reduce the area occupied by the normally large capacitor at the output of the ramp generator, we used our kickback cancellation (KBC) technique [13]. The simplified column circuitry is depicted in Figure 5. The column of the pixel (PIX_OUT signal) is connected to the input stage of the ADC via column-level HB. The comparator of the ADC contains feedback loop circuitry as shown on the right of Figure 5. The bottom right of Figure 5 shows that each toggling comparator shifts the ramp signal. This shift is proportional to the ratio between C2 and the total ramp capacitance. The feedback loop changes the bias current of the input stage of the comparator to keep node VA constant, attenuating the kickback and compensating the ramp shift, as shown in the bottom right of Figure 5. This technique allowed us to reduce the equivalent column capacitance needed by the ramp generator by a factor of four times at the same kickback performance. This nearly halved the footprint of the analog readout portion of the sensor. The impact could be even greater, depending on the capacitor density available in the technology node.

2.2. Power Consumption Reduction

We made extensive use of digital-friendly readout circuits [14], starting with the ramp ADC, which contains minimal analog circuitry. The scaled technology node (40 nm) of the logic layer enabled dramatic power reductions in the readout compared to our previous designs in older technology nodes. Certain building blocks that were the most power-hungry in our previous designs (e.g., ADC counter) experienced an order-of-magnitude reduction in power consumption. Additionally, we used advanced power-down techniques to optimize current consumption by turning on specific blocks only when needed. As shown in Table 1, the new power-down modes enabled power consumption values that scale nearly linearly with the frame rate. This is achieved by turning off all readout blocks as soon as a frame has been sent off-chip. For instance, at 30 fps, the frame time is ~33 ms but the frame readout time is 5 ms (equivalent to the maximum frame rate of 200 fps). It follows that the readout portion of the sensor can be kept off for ~28 ms (33–5 ms).

3. HDR Operation

One of the main disadvantages of global shutter pixels, especially voltage domain ones, is the difficulty in achieving high dynamic range (HDR) at a reasonable pixel pitch. Some of the recent attempts include pixel-level ADC [15], dual gain [16,17], and LOFIC [18,19]. The pixel-level ADC method is equivalent to a global shutter and can relatively easily implement HDR by using the common dual quantization technique [20]. This, however, comes at the cost of a very large pixel pitch. Even with 3D stacking technology, the pixel pitch stays above 4 µm [15]. Dual gain, LOFIC, and all other HDR approaches that rely on a low-sensitivity signal and high-sensitivity signal combination require the doubling of the in-pixel storage capacitors, increasing the pixel pitch to at least 3.45 µm [16,17].

To achieve HDR with a small pixel pitch, we developed a new method to read high-light and low-light signals and their reset levels by using only two storage capacitors per pixel [6]. In this work, we use the traditional 8T pixel (Figure 6), which does not include dual gain operation. To validate the reduction in storage capacitor idea with the current pixel, we combined LOFIC and dual exposure into the charge-overflow-on-FD technique shown in Figure 6.

Overflow operation is done on the floating diffusion node (FD), at a fraction (T1) of the low-light exposure time (T0), with the prior period (T0–T1) having FD in reset. The DR is extended by the classic T0/T1 ratio, with T0 exploiting the entire full well of the photodiode and T1 exploiting the entire full well of floating diffusion.

The technique makes use of the timing diagram of Figure 6 and works as follows. (A) Long exposure T0 starts when TX toggles low. (B) TX toggles high- to mid-level. This facilitates charge overflow from PD to FD in case of medium or high light. Pulsing TX to mid-level right before T1 starts ensures that overflowing charges before the start of T1 are discarded since the FD is in the reset state. This allows a linear HDR reconstruction. (C) Short exposure T1 starts when the reset switch is turned off. At this point, any overflowing charge is collected on the FD node. Since T1 is much shorter than T0 (e.g., 15x shorter), the FD leakage affecting T1 and the dark current affecting T0 are negligible. (D) T1 exposure ends when TX toggles back to the lowest level. T1 exposure is stored via S1 and S2 in C2. (E) Finally, T0 exposure ends when TX toggles high. The T0 signal is then stored on C1 via the S1 switch.

From above, the two storage capacitors store only the signal levels of T1 and T0 exposures. This would normally severely deteriorate the performance of the pixel due to the lack of CDS. However, we enable CDS for the low light signal (T0 exposure) and delta double sampling (DDS) for the high light signal (T1 exposure), as follows. Figure 7 shows three cases of light conditions (low, medium, and high light).

In the case of low-light conditions, no overflow occurs. Therefore, T1 exposure stored on C2 is the correlated reset level for long exposure T0, allowing CDS and hence keeping the noise level low (~5 e⁻) and the fixed pattern noise (FPN) under control (~3 e⁻).

In the case of a medium light level, overflow starts happening just after T1 starts (Figure 7, middle plot). To reconstruct the HDR image, both CDS (C2 − C1 signals) and DDS (C2 signal − dark reference) are needed during medium light since, as seen in the middle plot, their addition is the linear signal output. The choice of using both CDS and DDS is very important as it relaxes the process control requirements on the charge level of the overflow start. For instance, if the target overflow level is 5000 e⁻, the mid-light level can be defined starting at e.g., 3000 e⁻. When the light level is between 3000 e⁻ and 5000 e⁻, the DDS readout will not provide any signal in most sensors, with the CDS readout being sufficient. However, this choice would considerably increase the margin for a process variation of the overflow level, improving the yield of the sensor since the overflow level can deviate on the low side by up to 2000 e⁻ (5000 e⁻ target overflow − 3000 e⁻ mid-level definition) without impacting the HDR operation of the sensor. The drawback of this increased process margin is an increase in the SNR dip at mid-light levels.

The dark reference to allow for DDS is achieved during row readout by accessing the reset level of the pixel after reading the C2 and C1 signals, as shown in the timing diagram of Figure 6.

In the case of high light (Figure 7, right plot), the T0 exposure signal starts overflowing before T1 starts. Therefore, the CDS signal does not provide any meaningful information since it is not known when the overflow started. This means that in the case of high light, only the T1 signal is used for the HDR reconstruction. Therefore, DDS is used and CDS is discarded.

With the technique above, only two in-pixel capacitors are necessary for the four signals needed for HDR (low light + reset, high light + reset), as compared to the four capacitors needed by [16], for example. The main novelty of this technique is that CDS is maintained at low light, despite using only two capacitors, as explained in the low-light operation of the paragraph above. This method, employing only two capacitors for four signals, can be used with many other HDR techniques, including conventional LOFIC, dual exposure, dual gain, etc. Contrary to alternative HDR techniques, which use skimming [21,22], the proposed method does not need FPN calibration, and pipeline readout is possible, improving low-light performance. Figure 8 shows ~90.1 dB DR with ~26.8 dB at the dip point, which is sufficient for many consumer applications such as eye tracking and hand/head tracking.

Figure 9 shows an image captured in standard 12b 1× gain mode compared to the same bit mode but with HDR operation active. The light source used in this experiment was a xenon lamp. As can be seen, the highlighted part is recovered thanks to the shorter T1 exposure. Since the HDR technique was developed post-design, very limited HDR functionalities are testable with the current silicon. Extended HDR measurements with the current technique will be available in a revised chip design.

4. Event Detection Mode

The sensor includes an event detection mode for low-power operation when no movement is happening in the scene. As shown in Figure 10, the sensor splits the pixel array into a programmable number of tiles composed of binned and/or subsampled pixels and runs at 1 fps with low power (<3 mW). The tile values are compared to their previous value every N frames (programmable). When a certain threshold is crossed, the event detection is triggered, which can initiate an automatic context switch in the sensor.

The time interval of comparing the tile values depends on the nature of the event of interest. Short intervals (e.g., every frame) allow the detection of short events like a fast car movement but increase the likeliness of false positives. Long intervals (e.g., every N frames with N > 2) allow the detection of longer events like a person walking by. The threshold determines the sensitivity of the event detection. If the on-chip algorithm detects an event, the sensor switches to a user-defined operation mode (e.g., 120 fps, 10 bits). Compared to the ~48 mW of power consumed in 120 fps mode, this method allows a drastic reduction in power consumption for some applications where the sensor is placed on non-moving cameras, such as computing, doorbells, security/surveillance, etc.

5. Conclusions

With a 2.3 mm × 2.8 mm packaged size (Figure 11), the presented sensor is one of the smallest GS sensors reported in the literature and is commercially available. Despite its size, it contains 0.5 MP, a MIPI CSI2 interface, ultra-low power operation, and smart event detection modes, and proves the single-shot HDR concept with pipeline operation. The specialty of the proposed HDR technique is that it reuses the same pixel storage capacitor for both reset levels of low-light conditions and signal levels of high-light conditions.

Combined with QE enhancement technology, made possible by BSI technology (>92% in the visible wavelength, >36% in the NIR 940 nm range) it is comparable to past works [7,10,16,17] in terms of electro-optical performance, as shown in Table 2, while it excels in the top specifications of AR/VR applications, being low power and small footprint. It consumes <20 mW at 30 fps and <48 mW at 120 fps. In terms of area efficiency, it outperforms the listed state-of-the-art works with its 58% ratio between optical and overall package area, being an ideal candidate for consumer AR/VR devices. With better area efficiency, we could fit more and larger pixels compared to, e.g., [10], improving on both resolution and sensitivity.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Adi Xhakoni was employed by the company ams OSRAM.

References

Velichko, S. Overview of CMOS Global Shutter Pixels. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 69, 2806–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Meynants, G.; Walschap, T. 3d Camera System with Rolling-Shutter Image Sensor. U.S. Patent 16/755,784, 15 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
Xhakoni, A.; Fekri, A.; Francis, P.; Vancauwenbergh, K.; Van Esbroeck, K. A 40,000 fps global shutter image sensor with 26.7 ns 12-bit row readout time. In Proceedings of the International Image Sensors Workshop (IISW), Online Event, 20–23 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
Mizuno, I.; Tsutsui, M.; Yokoyama, T.; Hirata, T.; Nishi, Y.; Veinger, D.; Birman, A.; Lahav, A. A High-Performance 2.5 μm Charge Domain Global Shutter Pixel and Near Infrared Enhancement with Light Pipe Technology. Sensors 2020, 20, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Oike, Y. Evolution of Image Sensor Architectures With Stacked Device Technologies. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2022, 69, 2757–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xhakoni, A.; Fekri, A.; Francis, P.; Melsen, S.; Janardhan, S.; Hashani, B.; Popa, A.; Ruythooren, K.; De Wit, P.; Lafaille, R.; et al. A 90 dB Single-Shot HDR, 0.5 MP Global-Shutter Image Sensor with NIR QE Enhancement, 20 mW Power Consumption and Smart Event Detection Modes. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Image Sensors Workshop, Crieff, Scotland, 21–25 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
Kim, S.S.; Lee, G.D.R.; Park, S.S.; Shim, H.; Kim, D.H.; Choi, M.; Kim, S.; Park, G.; Oh, S.J.; Moon, J.; et al. 3-Layer Stacked Voltage-Domain Global Shutter CMOS Image Sensor with 1.8 μm-Pixel-Pitch. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 3–7 December 2022; pp. 37.5.1–37.5.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ono, A.; Hashimoto, K.; Yoshinaga, T.; Teranishi, N. Near-Infrared Sensitivity Enhancement of Silicon Image Sensor with Wide Incident Angle. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Image Sensors Workshop, Crieff, Scotland, 21–25 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
Liu, C.; Chen, S.; Tsai, T.H.; De Salvo, B.; Gomez, J. Augmented Reality—The Next Frontier of Image Sensors and Compute Systems. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 20–26 February 2022; pp. 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Park, G.; Hsuing, A.C.W.; Mabuchi, K.; Yao, J.; Lin, Z.; Venezia, V.C.; Yu, T.; Yang, Y.S.; Dai, T.; Grant, L.A. A 2.2 μm stacked back side illuminated voltage domain global shutter CMOS image sensor. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 7–11 December 2019; pp. 16.4.1–16.4.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Meynants, G.; Bogaerts, J.; Wolfs, B.; Ceulemans, B.; De Ridder, T.; Gvozdenović, A.; Gillisjans, E.; Salmon, X.; VandeVelde, G. 24 MPixel 36 × 24 mm² 14 Bit Image Sensor in 110/90 nm CMOS Technology. In Proceedings of the International Image Sensors Workshop (IISW), Snowbird, UT, USA, 12–16 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
Meynants, G.; Beeckman, G.; Van Wichelen, K.; De Ridder, T.; Koch, M.; Schippers, G.; Bonnifait, M.; Diels, W.; Bogaerts, J. Backside Illuminated 84 dB Global Shutter Image Sensor. In Proceedings of the International Image Sensors Workshop (IISW), Vaals, The Netherlands, 8–11 June 2015. [Google Scholar]
Meynants, G.; Wolfs, B.; Bogaerts, J.; Li, P.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Creten, Y.; Ruythooren, K.; Francis, P.; Lafaille, R.; et al. A 47 MPixel 36.4 × 27.6 mm2 30 fps Global Shutter Image Sensor. In Proceedings of the International Image Sensors Workshop (IISW), Hiroshima, Japan, 30 May–2 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
Chossat, J. Image Sensors in 3D Stacking Technology: Retrospective and Perspectives from a Digital Architect’s Point of View. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Image Sensors Workshop, Crieff, Scotland, 21–25 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
Ikeno, R.; Mori, K.; Uno, M.; Miyauchi, K.; Isozaki, T.; Takayanagi, I.; Nakamura, J.; Wuu, S.G.; Bainbridge, L.; Berkovich, A.; et al. A 4.6-μm, 127-dB Dynamic Range, Ultra-Low Power Stacked Digital Pixel Sensor With Overlapped Triple Quantization. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2022, 69, 2943–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cremers, B.; Freson, T.; Esquenet, C.; Vroom, W.; Prathipati, A.K.; Okcan, B.; Luypaert, C.; Jiang, H.; Witters, H.; Compiet, J.; et al. A 5MPixel Image Sensor with a 3.45 µm Dual Storage Global Shutter Back-Side Illuminated Pixel with 90 dB DR. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Image Sensors Workshop, Crieff, Scotland, 21–25 May 2023. [Google Scholar]
Miyauchi, K.; Mori, K.; Otaka, T.; Isozaki, T.; Yasuda, N.; Tsai, A.; Sawai, Y.; Owada, H.; Takayanagi, I.; Nakamura, J. A Stacked Back Side-Illuminated Voltage Domain Global Shutter CMOS Image Sensor with a 4.0 μm Multiple Gain Readout Pixel. Sensors 2020, 20, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sugawa, S.; Akahane, N.; Adachi, S.; Mori, K.; Ishiuchi, T.; Mizobuchi, K. A 100 dB dynamic range CMOS image sensor using a lateral overflow integration capacitor. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Digest of Technical Papers, Solid-State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–10 February 2005; Volume 1, pp. 352–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Takayanagi, I.; Miyauchi, K.; Okura, S.; Mori, K.; Nakamura, J.; Sugawa, S. A 120-ke− Full-Well Capacity 160-µV/e− Conversion Gain 2.8-µm Backside-Illuminated Pixel with a Lateral Overflow Integration Capacitor. Sensors 2019, 19, 5572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yadid-Pecht, O.; Fossum, E.R. Wide intrascene dynamic range CMOS APS using dual sampling. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1997, 44, 1721–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Solhusvik, J.; Kuang, J.; Lin, Z.; Manabe, S.; Lyu, J.H.; Rhodes, H. A Comparison of High Dynamic Range CIS Technologies for Automotive Applications. In Proceedings of the International Image Sensors Workshop (IISW), Snowbird, UT, USA, 12–16 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
Xu, C.; Mo, Y.; Ren, G.; Ma, W.; Wang, X.; Shi, W.; Hou, J.; Shao, K.; Wang, H.; Xiao, P.; et al. 5.1 A Stacked Global-Shutter CMOS Imager with SC-Type Hybrid-GS Pixel and Self-Knee Point Calibration Single Frame HDR and On-Chip Binarization Algorithm for Smart Vision Applications. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference—(ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 17–21 February 2019; pp. 94–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Global shutter sensor (left) exposing all pixels at the same time vs. rolling shutter sensor (right) exposing rows of pixels sequentially.

Figure 2. CIS silicon (left) stacked on top of logic silicon (right) via hybrid bonding interconnects.

Figure 3. The added light-scattering structure increases QE in both visible and NIR wavelengths.

Figure 4. After natural shrinkage of digital blocks from technology node scaling, special layout techniques were used to shrink the row drivers and analog parts of ADC.

Figure 5. Analog part of the ramp ADC using the embedded kickback cancellation circuit, which reduces the area of the ramp capacitance by a factor of four times.

Figure 6. Voltage-domain GS pixel and simplified HDR timing. C2 stores overflow signal (at high light) or reset signal (at low light). The reset level of overflow is read during row readout. Only two capacitors are then needed to store the reset low light, low-light signal, overflow signal, and reset of overflow. CDS at low light is maintained, allowing low noise in dark conditions. Overflow happens during short T1 at FD, avoiding the need for a large overflow cap and reducing DSNU and dark current.

Figure 7. During low-light conditions (left plot), no signal overflows during T1. During mid-light conditions (mid plot), overflow happens just after T1 starts. During high-light conditions (right plot), overflow happens before T1 starts.

Figure 8. ~90 dB DR is achieved with T0/T1 = 16x. A larger DR is possible by trading off with an SNR dip. Part of the data from the plot is simulated as a full char report and is not available for the current product in HDR mode.

Figure 9. Image captures at 12-bit 1× gain with same light intensity at 1 ms exposure. (a) Standard mode; (b) HDR mode.

Figure 10. User-programmable event detection mode operating at 1 fps. When an event is detected, the sensor switches to another user-defined mode (e.g., 120 fps, 10 bits, 0.5 MP).

Figure 11. A 2.3 mm × 2.8 mm CSP version where A and B denote the optical size and the total package size, respectively.

Table 1. Power consumption of the sensor at different fps.

Mode	Power Consumption
30 fps, 10 bits	18.5 mW
60 fps, 10 bits	30 mW
120 fps, 10 bits	48 mW
200 fps, 10 bits	75 mW

Table 2. Comparison table.

Parameter	[7]	[10]	[17]	[16]	This Work
technology	Triple-Stacked 65 nm + 65 nm + 45 nm	stacked 45 nm − 65 nm	stacked 45 nm − 65 nm	stacked 45 nm − 65 nm	stacked 45 nm + 40 nm
Pixel pitch (µm)	1.8	2.2	4	3.45	2.79
Resolution	1280 × 1024	640 × 480	1024 × 832	5 MP	600 × 800
Shutter	Global VD	Global VD	Global VD	Global VD	Global VD
DR (dB)	68 (HCG)	61	90	90	90
Noise (e−)	1.8 (HCG)	2.3 (HCG mode)	4	2.7 (HCG)	5 (LCG mode)
Power (mW)	-	139	-	-	<20 mW @10 b, 30 fps, 48 mW @120 fps
Footprint efficiency ratio (%) *	-	19.2	21.3	-	58
Footprint (mm × mm)	-	2.6 × 2.95	8 × 8	-	2.3 × 2.8
QE 940 nm (%)	Only visible reported	38	40	41	36

* Represents ratio between optical area and overall die area (A/B of Figure 11).

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xhakoni, A. A 0.5 MP, 3D-Stacked, Voltage-Domain Global Shutter Image Sensor with NIR QE Enhancement, Event Detection Modes, and 90 dB Dynamic Range. Sensors 2023, 23, 9448. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239448

AMA Style

Xhakoni A. A 0.5 MP, 3D-Stacked, Voltage-Domain Global Shutter Image Sensor with NIR QE Enhancement, Event Detection Modes, and 90 dB Dynamic Range. Sensors. 2023; 23(23):9448. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239448

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xhakoni, Adi. 2023. "A 0.5 MP, 3D-Stacked, Voltage-Domain Global Shutter Image Sensor with NIR QE Enhancement, Event Detection Modes, and 90 dB Dynamic Range" Sensors 23, no. 23: 9448. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239448

APA Style

Xhakoni, A. (2023). A 0.5 MP, 3D-Stacked, Voltage-Domain Global Shutter Image Sensor with NIR QE Enhancement, Event Detection Modes, and 90 dB Dynamic Range. Sensors, 23(23), 9448. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239448

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu