Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Next Article in Journal
Predicting Blast-Induced Ground Vibration in Open-Pit Mines Using Vibration Sensors and Support Vector Regression-Based Optimization Algorithms
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Lower Limb Kinetics and Kinematics during Walking by a Single IMU on the Lower Back Using Machine Learning
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 20
Issue 1
10.3390/s20010131
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sensitivity Enhancement of a Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor with Platinum Diselenide

by
Yue Jia
1,†,
Zhongfu Li
1,†,
Haiqi Wang
1,
Muhammad Saeed
2 and
Houzhi Cai
1,*
1
College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2
Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These two authors have equal contributions.
Sensors 2020, 20(1), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010131
Submission received: 10 November 2019 / Revised: 16 December 2019 / Accepted: 17 December 2019 / Published: 24 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)
Browse Figures
Figure 1
<p>Sketch diagram of the PtSe<sub>2</sub> surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biochemical sensor to enhance the sensitivity.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Real and imaginary parts of the complex dielectric function for PtSe<sub>2</sub> at a wavelength of 633 nm.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Variation of reflectivity with incident angles for (<b>a</b>),(<b>c</b>) the conventional biochemical sensor based on simplex Ag or Au film; and (<b>b</b>),(<b>d</b>) the proposed biochemical sensors with PtSe<sub>2</sub> on Ag or Au, respectively.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) The reflectances of the PtSe<sub>2</sub> biosensor on Ag film and Au film change with different numbers of PtSe<sub>2</sub> layers, respectively; (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) the reflectance of PtSe<sub>2</sub> biosensor with 2.0 nm PtSe<sub>2</sub> varies with the refractive indices of the sensing medium on Ag film and Au film, respectively.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Electric field distributions for the PtSe<sub>2</sub> on Ag film and Au film sensors; (<b>b</b>) Variation of sensitivity with respect to PtSe<sub>2</sub> in different thicknesses; (<b>c</b>) The sensitivities of the proposed biochemical sensors with 2.0 nm PtSe<sub>2</sub> vary with the refractive indices of sensing medium on Ag film and Au film, respectively; (<b>d</b>) Variation of quality factors with respect to the thickness of PtSe<sub>2</sub> varying from 0 to 7 nm of PtSe<sub>2</sub> biosensor.</p> ">
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The extraordinary optoelectronic properties of platinum diselenide (PtSe2), whose structure is similar to graphene and phosphorene, has attracted great attention in new rapidly developed two-dimensional (2D) materials beyond the other 2D material family members. We have investigated the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors through PtSe2 with the transfer matrix method. The simulation results show that the anticipated PtSe2 biochemical sensors have the ability to detect analytic. It is evident that only the sensitivities of Ag or Au film biochemical sensors were observed at 118°/RIU (refractive index unit) and 130°/RIU, whereas the sensitivities of the PtSe2-based biochemical sensors reached as high as 162°/RIU (Ag film) and 165°/RIU (Au film). The diverse biosensor sensitivities with PtSe2 suggest that this kind of 2D material can adapt SPR sensor properties.

1. Introduction

We have investigated biochemical sensors based on the surface plasmon resonance technique, which has been applied in extraordinary biological and chemical applications, because of their biocompatibility, excellent sensitivity, and accurate detection for pharmaceutics, for instance, in medical diagnostics and enzyme detection [1,2,3,4]. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) refers to the resonance excitation of the surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) at the interface of the negative (metal) and positive (dielectrics) constant materials, which is considered as best suited for untagging sensing and real-time monitoring [5,6].
One of the most effective ways for improving the efficiency of sensing devices is to select a material, such as graphene, to optimize sensing functions [7,8,9,10]. The significant properties of transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) materials, such as their absorption rate (~5%), which is higher compared to a graphene monolayer (2.3%), entirely different large tunable band gap than the zero band gap of graphene, and large biosense work function in comparison to graphene, are increasingly becoming preferred in biosensing applications. The outstanding electrical, optical, and chemical properties of TMDCs are converting them as promising candidates and accessory materials in comparison to graphene for the future generation of electronic and optic facilities [11,12,13]. TMDC-based SPR sensors are recommended for refractive index sensing and exhibit highly improved sensitivity [14,15].
A series of ultrasensitive photonic crystal fiber based surface plasmon resonance fiber sensors have been made by Md. Saiful Islam et al. proposed polarization-sensitive sensors that showed a relatively high wavelength sensitivity of 25,000 nm/RIU and a high detection limit [16,17,18]. Wu et al. obtained the highest sensitivity of 134.6°/RIU by using a graphene layer for the SPR biosensor to enhance the sensitivity caused by the light absorbed [15,19]. L. Wu and Z. Lin et al. have produced MoS2–graphene hybrid structures that are biocompatible and useful in the field of biosensors. Maximum sensitivities of 182°/RIU and 190°/RIU were obtained with 4-layer MoS2 and a monolayer of graphene or 6-layer MoS2 coatings, respectively, both on surfaces of Al thin film [20,21]. Ouyang et al. reported that PR biosensors using MoS2 to improve the sensitivity had the highest sensitivity of 125°/RIU [22].
As single-layer PtSe2 exhibits the same pattern of structure as graphene and phosphorene, it also keeps excellent optical and electrical properties that have attracted great attention as a 2D material beyond the predecessor members [10,23,24]. PtSe2 is a group ten TMDC with a 1T-phase [25]. The band gap of PtSe2 is highly tunable because of its intrinsic quantum confinement effect and strong interlayer interaction. This leads to a type-Ⅱ Dirac semimetal-to-semiconductor transition when going from bulk to few-layer form and exhibits the largest band gap of ~1.2 eV for monolayer (ML) PtSe2 (from theoretical prediction) [26,27]. Moreover, different types of stress can be applied on PtSe2, which can be modulated easily [28]. Furthermore, less toxicity and chemical stability has been investigated in PtSe2 sensing applications [23,29,30]. TMDC PtSe2 monolayers not only possess a significant thermoelectric character, having semiconductor properties, but it also has an outstanding optoelectronic property. To the best of our knowledge, few systematic studies have been performed on the optic and electric properties of PtSe2.
In the visible light region, Ag and Au are considered ideal candidates as metallic films [4]. Ag films usually give a sharper peak compared Au and offer better sensitivity, which is used for enhancing biosensor sensitivity [31]. In the reaction system, however, the Au film shows stability, strong adhesion with the glass, and it produces no reaction with inorganic ions. As Au is not susceptible to oxidation, and it usually does not react with most chemicals, it is usually used as metallic film in sensors [32]. Here, Ag and Au film is used as a metallic layer coating on top of the BK7 substrate in SPR biological systems. The 2D material PtSe2 might be used as the protective layer adjoining the biomolecular recognition elements to prevent oxidation and increase biomolecule adsorption. In this paper, the 2D material PtSe2 is used in SPR biochemical sensors to enhance the sensitivity and retain chemical stability. Here, Kretschmann’s attenuated total reflection (ATR) configuration has been selected as the SPR sensor structure [33]. Kretschmann’s configuration is one of the most basic SPR configurations of biosensors and is usually composed of a coupling prism and metallic film. Biomolecules and metallic membranes can interact with each other, through which biomolecules can be detected. We have used Ag or Au to cover, on the basis of the optical coupling prism, BK7 glass to be used as the coupling prism, and PtSe2 covers the metallic layer in this structure [34,35].

2. Calculation Models and Methods

Z. Lou and other authors provided their synthesized nanoparticle−organic clusters (NOCs) as signal amplification reagents permitting an SPR signal four times higher than that of the sandwich format [36,37,38]. Here, our design presents a proposed structure having a high-sensitivity sensor separately containing PtSe2, as shown in Figure 1. In these SPR structures, the Ag or Au film is installed on top of the BK7 coupling prism, and the PtSe2 layer is the biomolecular recognition element coated on the Ag/Au film surface. The size of the thickness of the PtSe2 monolayer is 0.375 nm [27]. We have used BK7 glass as a coupling prism. As the first-rank metal for SPP, the Au film or Ag film is chosen at 50 nm. The BK7 glass refractive index can be calculated using the following equation [39]:
n B K 7 = ( 1.03961212 λ 2 λ 2 − 0.00600069867 + 0.231792344 λ 2 λ 2 − 0.0200179144 + 1.03961212 λ 2 λ 2 − 103.560653 + 1 ) 1 2
The refractive index of Ag or Au can be expressed from the Drude–Lorentz model [40]:
n m = ε m = [ 1 − λ 2 λ c λ p 2 ( λ c + i λ ) ] 1 2
where λc and λp represent the collision and plasma wavelengths. The values of λc and λp for Ag are 1.7614 × 10−5 m and 1.4541 × 10−7 m, whereas for Au they are 8.9342 × 10−6 m and 1.6826 × 10−7 m, respectively. In order to further enhance the sensibility of the designed biochemical sensors, we have covered the metal Ag or Au film surface with PtSe2 to impede the metal being oxidized.
Experimental modulating is used to get the refractive indices as a variable quantity of PtSe2, which is composed of real and imaginary parts [41]. The real and imaginary parts of the complex dielectric function of PtSe2 for a wavelength at 633 nm are exhibited in Figure 2. The expression ns = 1.33 + Δn is presented as the refractive index in the sensitive medium, and Δn represents refractive index change in sensitive medium as a result of biological action or a chemical reaction.
The transfer matrix method has been used [42] to investigate the reflectivity of the incident TM-polarized light of the N-layer model, as the matrix method is accurate and without approximations. MATLAB was used to compute the analogous SPR modulation. In these PtSe2 biosensors, all layers are piled in the direction of the vertical BK7 glass coupling prism, and each layer is named by the refractive index (nk), thickness (dk), and dielectric constant (εk), respectively. The resonance angle is the minimum reflectance corresponding to the incident angle. The tangential field of the first boundary Z = Z1 = 0 is correlated with the tangential field of the final boundary Z = ZN−1:
[ U 1 V 1 ] = M [ U N − 1 V N − 1 ]
where V and U represent the components of magnetic and electric fields at the limiting surface. M and k present the characteristic matrix of the composite architecture and the kth layer in the N-layered model, respectively. P-polarized light is made up of:
∏ K = 2 N − 1 M K = [ M 11 M 12 M 21 M 22 ] ,
M K = [ cos β K − sin β K q k − iq k sin β k cos β k ] ,
q k = ( μ k δ k ) 1 2 cos θ k = ( ε k − n 1 2 sin θ 1 2 ) 1 2 ε k ,
β k = 2 π λ n k cos θ k ( Z k − Z k − 1 ) = 2 π d k λ ( ε k − n 1 2 sin θ 1 2 ) 1 2 .
After mathematical simplifications, we get the p-polarized light N-layer complex reflection coefficient rp, and the corresponding amplitude reflection coefficient (Rp) might be obtained by the square of rp:
r p = ( M 11 + M 12 q 5 ) q 1 − ( M 21 + M 22 q 5 ) ( M 11 + M 12 q 5 ) q 1 + ( M 21 + M 22 q 5 ) ,
R p = | r p | 2 .
The transformation of sensing medium in refractive index (Δn) can initiate the alteration of the resonance angle (Δθ), and the sensitivity can be indicated as SR1 = Δθ/Δn [43].
The detection accuracy (DA) is the ratio in the reflectance curve of shift in resonance angle (∆θres) to the full width at half-maximum (FWHM):
D A = Δ θ / F W H M
The figure of merit (FOM) is the ratio in the reflectance curve of sensitivity (S) to the FWHM [44]:
F O M = S / F W H M

3. Results and Discussion

Because of the low refractive index of BK7 glass, it was chosen as the coupling prism in these expected biochemical sensors. For the conventional SPR, the Kretschmann geometry biochemical sensor mostly offers a simplex metallic layer to survey SPP, as illustrated in Figure 3. The values of the sensitivity of the conventional Ag or Au metal were 118°/RIU and 130°/RIU, as shown in Figure 3a,c, respectively, by using BK7 glass prism. However, this value is not satisfactory for biochemical sensor sensitivity [45,46]. In this paper, we have developed SPR biochemical sensors by using 2D TMDC PtSe2 materials to enhance the sensitivities of the sensors.
The addition of the 2D TMDC PtSe2 material between the metallic (Au or Ag) film and sensing medium in the structure of biosensors increased the sensitivities. The results clearly suggest a large improvement in the sensitivities when the PtSe2 monolayer covers the previous structure, as shown in Figure 3b,d. For the Ag film or Au film, we have obtained sensitivities equal to 162°/RIU and 165°/RIU at the layers accumulating 16 and 12 layers, respectively.
In future experiments, 2D PtSe2 nanosheets can be prepared by the liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) method, and then the nanosheets will be coated on the Ag or Au thin film (~50 nm) with the BK7 substrate by using the spin coating method [47]. The SPR sensors can be constructed by connecting the PtSe2–Ag/Au–BK7 multilayer films and the BK7 prism with the refractive index matching solution.
Based on these biochemical sensor results, the 2D TMDC PtSe2 material might increase sensitivities. The reflectivity of PtSe2 layers changed with the variation in the incident angle, which is shown in Figure 4a,c, illustrating that sensitivities varied with different layers of PtSe2-based biochemical sensors from ns = 1.33 to ns = 1.37 to the sensing medium refractive index. The reflectivity changes with the incident angle are shown in Figure 4b,d. It is clear from Figure 4b,d that, with the increase of refractive indices of the sensitive media, the angles of resonance of PtSe2 sensors at 2.0 nm thickness shifted to a higher angle of incidence. The resonance angles were 67.54°, 68.13°, 68.75°, 69.39°, and 70.06° when ns = 1.33, ns = 1.34, ns = 1.35, ns = 1.36, and ns = 1.37 for Ag film, respectively. Whereas, the resonance angles for Au film were 70.33°, 71.01°, 71.73°, 72.49°, and 73.28° when ns = 1.33, ns = 1.34, ns = 1.35, ns = 1.36, and ns = 1.37, respectively.
Figure 5a presents distributions of the electric field for the proposed SPR sensors for PtSe2 material on Ag or Au film, respectively. It has been investigated that coating PtSe2 on the Ag film might enhance the electric field at the sensor/sensing medium interface, where PtSe2 gets the maximum electric field strength, since PtSe2 appears in the middle and is located at the last single layer of PtSe2.
The changes of sensitivities for PtSe2 on Ag and Au surface biosensors are plotted in Figure 5b. It can be seen that the values of the highest sensitivities of PtSe2 occur at 162°/RIU and 165°/RIU, respectively. Then, the sensitivity curves decrease with an increasing PtSe2 layer thickness, causing the gold or silver film coating on the PtSe2 nanosheet overlayer to affect the evanescent electric field distribution, which, in turn, has an impact on the decay length [47]. Figure 5c shows the electric field distributions of 2.0 nm PtSe2 on Ag film and Au film biochemical sensors, separately. The refractive indices of the inductive media changed within the range of 1.33 to 1.37, and the change in the electric field of graphene/sensing medium interface has been clearly observed. It was found that the designed PtSe2-based biochemical sensors are sensitive when detecting small changes in sensitive media. A major change of the surface wave characteristics might occur as a result of small changes in the refractive index of sensitive medium close to the interface, which may produce change in the electric field. Figure 5d gives the change of FOM for this PtSe2 biosensor. When the thickness of the 2D PtSe2 material was from 0 to 7 nm, and the change of width was kept from 1° to 3°, we calculated the FOM using Equation (11). From this calculation, we can determine that the FOM decreases with the increase of thickness on both Ag and Au films.
Table 1 presents the information about change in thickness of PtSe2, layer numbers (L), highest sensitivity (S), minimum resonance angle (θmin) at ns = 1.33, and resonance angle change (Δθ) from ns = 1.330 to ns = 1.335. The smallest reflectivity (Rmin), FWHM, and FOM were at ns = 1.33, and DA was at ns = 1.33 to ns = 1.34 in these PtSe2 biochemical sensors on Ag or Au films. The thicknesses of Ag and Au were set to 50 nm. We set the range of the incident angle from 0° to 90°. The thicknesses of PtSe2 layers came from reference [41], and layer numbers were calculated from the thickness of the PtSe2 monolayer, which was 0.375 nm. The reflectivity curve steps forward at a higher angle with an increase in the number of PtSe2 layers. Once the PtSe2 layers are augmented to the optimized value, maximum sensitivity can be obtained. For PtSe2 on Ag and Au, the sensitivities achieved maximum values as the layers accumulated to 16 and 12, respectively. As a result of certain restrictions on the angle range, there was a direct relation of the variation of the resonance angle with the sensitivity (i.e., as the variation of the resonance angle lowered, the sensitivity decreased after exceeding the optimized PtSe2 layers). In the end, we are also aware that most high-sensitivity sensors are accompanied by an increase in SPR linewidth and a reduction in figure of merit (FOM), and a higher FOM usually means a lower sensitivity [48]. Table 1 also lists the FWHM, DA, and FOM data for these PtSe2 biosensors.
When the dielectric refractive index change is Δn, the reflection angle of the prism with a lower refractive index gave a larger result, which means that when the refractive index of the prism is low, a relatively higher sensitivity can be obtained [20]. Therefore, higher sensitivity can be obtained by using a prism with a low refractive index. The refractive indexes of silicon and BK7 were calculated as 3.420 and 1.515 at λ = 633 nm, respectively [15,49]. Therefore, to improve the sensitivity, BK7 was chosen as the coupling prism in the proposed architecture.
Table 2 gives the information about the optimized layers of different architectures, changes in resonance angle (Δθ), highest sensitivity (S), and FOM from another two previous papers in our laboratory. Comparing with these data of graphene, MoS2, black phosphorous heterojunction, and diversification architectures [51], PtSe2-based biosensors did not have the highest sensitivity. However, this high sensitivity and simple biosensor structure makes it easy to achieve commercial production.

4. Conclusions

On the basis of the Kretschmann configuration, we have theoretically investigated a new type of biosensor structure with the insertion of a PtSe2 layer. In this paper, SPR biochemical sensors utilizing 2D TMDC PtSe2 have been designed and emulated to improve the sensitivities. Moreover, the various characters of PtSe2 on different metal substrates have been discussed in detail. In order to obtain a high sensitivity, we used BK7 as the coupling prism in this structure because of its low refractive index. Ag or Au films were covered with PtSe2 to enhance the sensitivities as well as the protective layers. It was found that they enhanced the sensitivities in the advised biochemical sensors, and the sensitivities of PtSe2 were 162°/RIU and 165°/RIU for Ag and Au substrates at PtSe2 layers 16 and 12, respectively. We are convinced that these kinds of sensors can have potential applications in environmental monitoring, biological detection, medical diagnosis, chemical examination, and so on.

Author Contributions

Methodology and writing—original draft preparation, Y.J.; software, Z.L.; These two authors have equal contributions. Validation, H.W., M.S.; writing—review and editing, H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61505111, 11604216, and 11775147) and the Science and Technology Plan Project of Shenzhen (Grant No. JCYJ20180305125443569).

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61505111 and 11604216).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rothenhäusler, B.; Knoll, W. Surface–plasmon microscopy. Nature 1988, 332, 615–617. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zeng, B.; Gao, Y.; Bartoli, F.J. Differentiating surface and bulk interactions in nanoplasmonic interferometric sensor arrays. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Gao, Y.; Xin, Z.; Zeng, B.; Gan, Q.; Cheng, X.; Bartoli, F.J. Plasmonic interferometric sensor arrays for high-performance label-free biomolecular detection. Lab Chip 2013, 13, 4755–4764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shalabney, A.; Abdulhalim, I. Sensitivity-enhancement methods for surface plasmon sensors. Laser Photonics Rev. 2011, 5, 571–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Johansen, K.; Arwin, H.; Lundström, I.; Liedberg, B. Imaging surface plasmon resonance sensor based on multiple wavelengths: Sensitivity considerations. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2000, 71, 3530–3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ouyang, Q.; Zeng, S.; Jiang, L.; Qu, J.; Dinh, X.Q.; Qian, J.; He, S.; Coquet, P.; Yong, K.-T. Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Enhanced Phase-Sensitive Plasmonic Biosensors: Theoretical Insight. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 6282–6289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bui, V.Q.; Pham, T.T.; Le, D.A.; Thi, C.M.; Le, H.M. A firstprinciples investigation of various gas (CO, H2O, NO, and O2) absorptions on a WS2 monolayer: Stability and electronic properties. J. Phys. 2015, 27, 305005. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Dong, J.; Hu, S.; Zhu, W.; Qiu, W.; Lu, H.; Yu, J.; Guan, H.; Gao, S.; et al. Sensitivity-enhanced surface plasmon resonance sensor utilizing a tungsten disulfide (WS2) nanosheets overlayer. Photonics Res. 2018, 6, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guo, S.D. Biaxial strain tuned thermoelectric properties in monolayer PtSe2. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 9366–9374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Z.; Li, Q.; Besenbacher, F.; Dong, M. Facile Synthesis of Single Crystal PtSe2 Nanosheets for Nanoscale Electronics. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10224–10229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Q.H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J.N.; Strano, M.S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, H.; Liu, C.-X.; Qi, X.-L.; Dai, X.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators in Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nat. Phys. 2009, 5, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Castro Neto, A.H.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N.M.R.; Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Verma, R.; Gupta, B.D.; Jha, R. Sensitivity enhancement of a surface plasmon resonance based biomolecules sensor using graphene and silicon layers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 160, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Saiful Islam, M.D.; Cordeiro, C.M.B.; Sultana, J.; Aoni, R.A.; Feng, S.; Ahmed, R.; Dorraki, M.; Dinovitser, A.; Ng, B.W.-H.; Abbot, D. A Hi-Bi Ultra-Sensitive Surface Plasmon Resonance Fiber Sensor. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 79085–79094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saiful Islam, M.D.; Sultana, J.; Rifat, A.A.; Ahmed, R.; Dinovitser, A.; Ng, B.W.-H.; Ebendorff-Heidepriem, H.; Abbott, D. Dual-polarized highly sensitive plasmonic sensor in the visible to near-IR spectrum. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 30347–30361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Saiful Islam, M.D.; Sultana, J.; Aoni, R.A.; Habib, M.S.; Dinovitser, A.; Ng, B.W.-H.; Abbott, D. Localized surface plasmon resonance biosensor: An improved technique for SERS response intensification. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 1134–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, L.; Chu, H.S.; Koh, W.S.; Li, E.P. Highly sensitive graphene biosensors based on surface plasmon resonance. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 14395–14400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, L.; Jia, Y.; Jiang, L.; Guo, J.; Dai, X.; Xiang, Y.; Fan, D. Sensitivity Improved SPR Biosensor Based on the MoS2/Graphene–Aluminum Hybrid Structure. J. Lightwave Technol. 2017, 35, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, Z.; Jiang, L.; Wu, L.; Guo, J.; Dai, X.; Xiang, Y.; Fan, D. Tuning and Sensitivity Enhancement of Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor With Graphene Covered Au-MoS2-Au Films. IEEE Photonics J. 2016, 8, 4803308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ouyang, Q.; Zeng, S.; Dinh, X.Q.; Coquet, P.; Yong, K.T. Sensitivity enhancement of MoS2 nanosheet based surface Plasmon resonance biosensor. Proc. Eng. 2016, 140, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yim, C.; Lee, K.; McEvoy, N.; O’Brien, M.; Riazimehr, S.; Berner, N.C.; Cullen, C.P.; Kotakoski, J.; Meyer, J.C.; Lemme, M.C.; et al. High-Performance Hybrid Electronic Devices from Layered PtSe2 Films Grown at Low Temperature. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 9550–9558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Chia, X.; Adriano, A.; Lazar, P.; Sofer, Z.; Luxa, J.; Pumera, M. Layered Platinum Dichalcogenides (PtS2, PtSe2, and PtTe2) Electrocatalysis: Monotonic Dependence on the Chalcogen Size. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 4306–4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, K.; Yan, M.; Zhang, H.; Huang, H.; Arita, M.; Sun, Z.; Duan, W.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, S. Experimental evidence for type-II Dirac semimetal in PtSe2. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 125102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Yao, W.; Song, S.; Sun, J.T.; Pan, J.; Ren, X.; Li, C.; Okunishi, E.; Wang, Y.-Q.; et al. Monolayer PtSe2, a New Semiconducting Transition-Metal-Dichalcogenide, Epitaxially Grown by Direct Selenization of Pt. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 4013–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhuang, H.L.; Hennig, R.G. Computational Search for Single-Layer Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide Photocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 20440–20445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, P.; Li, L.; Zeng, X.C. Tuning the electronic properties of monolayer and bilayer PtSe2 via strain engineering. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 3106–3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lloyd, S. Graphene Flagship, AWE International. Available online: http://www.aweimagazine.com/article/environmental-sensing-with-graphene/ (accessed on 1 October 2018).
  30. Sajjad, M.; Montes, E.; Singh, N.; Schwingenschlögl, U. Superior Gas Sensing Properties of Monolayer PtSe2. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 1600911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mitsushio, M.; Miyashita, K.; Higo, M. Sensor properties and surface characterization of the metal-deposited SPR optical fiber sensors with Au, Ag, Cu, and Al. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2006, 125, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, L.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhu, X.; Jia, F.; Cao, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Song, D. Sensitivity enhancement of SPR biosensor with silver mirror reaction on the Ag/Au film. Talanta 2009, 78, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Raether, H. Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cheng, Z.; Wang, Z.; Gillespie, D.E.; Lausted, C.; Zheng, Z.; Yang, M.; Zhu, J. Plain Silver Surface Plasmon Resonance for Microarray Application. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1466–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Singh, V.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Song, L.; Zhu, J. Stable and Sensitive Silver Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging Sensor Using Trilayered Metallic Structures. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 1430–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yuan, C.; Lou, Z.; Wang, W.; Yang, L.; Li, Y. Synthesis of Fe3C@C from Pyrolysis of Fe3O4-Lignin Clusters and Its Application for Quick and Sensitive Detection of PrPSc through a Sandwich SPR Detection Assay. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lou, Z.; Han, H.; Mao, D.; Jiang, Y.; Song, J. Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of PrPSc Based on the Controlled Release Property of Magnetic Microspheres Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR). Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lou, Z.; Han, H.; Zhou, M.; Wan, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhou, X.; Gu, N. Fabrication of Magnetic Conjugation Clusters via Intermolecular Assembling for Ultrasensitive Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Detection in a Wide Range of Concentrations. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 13472–13479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dai, X.; Liang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Gan, S.; Jia, Y.; Xiang, Y. Sensitivity Enhancement of a Surface Plasmon Resonance with Tin Selenide (SnSe) Allotropes. Sensors 2019, 19, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gupta, B.D.; Sharma, A.K. Sensitivity evaluation of a multi-layered surface plasmon resonance-based fiber optic sensor: A theoretical study. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 107, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xie, J.; Zhang, D.; Yan, X.Q.; Ren, M.; Zhao, X.; Liu, F.; Sun, R.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Chen, S.; et al. Optical properties of chemical vapor deposition-grown PtSe2 characterized by spectroscopic ellipsometry. 2D Mater. 2019, 6, 035011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hansen, W.N. Electric Fields Produced by the Propagation of Plane Coherent Electromagnetic Radiation in a Stratified Medium. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1968, 58, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Maharana, P.K.; Jha, R. Chalcogenide prism and graphene multilayer based surface plasmon resonance affinity biosensor for high performance. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 169, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Homola, J. Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors for Detection of Chemical and Biological Species. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 462–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zeng, S.; Baillargeat, D.; Ho, H.-P.; Yong, K.-T. Nanomaterials enhanced surface plasmon resonance for biological and chemical sensing applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 3426–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Homola, J.; YEE, S.S.; Gauglitz, G. Surface plasmon resonance sensors: Review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1999, 54, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xiong, X. Plasmonic interface modified with graphene oxide sheets overlayer for sensitivity enhancement. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 34916–34923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, L.; Guo, J.; Wang, Q.; Lu, S.; Dai, X.; Xiang, Y.; Fan, D. Sensitivity enhancement by using few-layer blackphosphorus-graphene/TMDCs heterostructure in surface plasmonresonance biochemical sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 249, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Maharana, P.K.; Srivastava, T.; Jha, R. On the Performance of Highly Sensitive and Accurate Graphene-on-Aluminum and Silicon-Based SPR Biosensor for Visible and Near Infrared. Plasmonics 2014, 9, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maurya, J.B.; Prajapati, Y.K.; Singh, V.; Saini, J.P. Sensitivity enhancement of surface plasmon resonance sensor based on graphene–MoS2 hybrid structure with TiO2–SiO2 composite layer. Appl. Phys. A 2015, 121, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lou, Z.; Wan, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, S.; Gu, N. Quick and sensitive SPR detection of prion disease-associated isoform (PrPSc) based on its self-assembling behavior on bare gold film andspecific interactions with aptamer-graphene oxide (AGO). Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 157, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 20 00131 g001 550
Figure 1. Sketch diagram of the PtSe2 surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biochemical sensor to enhance the sensitivity.
Figure 1. Sketch diagram of the PtSe2 surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biochemical sensor to enhance the sensitivity.
Sensors 20 00131 g001
Sensors 20 00131 g002 550
Figure 2. Real and imaginary parts of the complex dielectric function for PtSe2 at a wavelength of 633 nm.
Figure 2. Real and imaginary parts of the complex dielectric function for PtSe2 at a wavelength of 633 nm.
Sensors 20 00131 g002
Sensors 20 00131 g003 550
Figure 3. Variation of reflectivity with incident angles for (a),(c) the conventional biochemical sensor based on simplex Ag or Au film; and (b),(d) the proposed biochemical sensors with PtSe2 on Ag or Au, respectively.
Figure 3. Variation of reflectivity with incident angles for (a),(c) the conventional biochemical sensor based on simplex Ag or Au film; and (b),(d) the proposed biochemical sensors with PtSe2 on Ag or Au, respectively.
Sensors 20 00131 g003
Sensors 20 00131 g004 550
Figure 4. (a,c) The reflectances of the PtSe2 biosensor on Ag film and Au film change with different numbers of PtSe2 layers, respectively; (b,d) the reflectance of PtSe2 biosensor with 2.0 nm PtSe2 varies with the refractive indices of the sensing medium on Ag film and Au film, respectively.
Figure 4. (a,c) The reflectances of the PtSe2 biosensor on Ag film and Au film change with different numbers of PtSe2 layers, respectively; (b,d) the reflectance of PtSe2 biosensor with 2.0 nm PtSe2 varies with the refractive indices of the sensing medium on Ag film and Au film, respectively.
Sensors 20 00131 g004
Sensors 20 00131 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Electric field distributions for the PtSe2 on Ag film and Au film sensors; (b) Variation of sensitivity with respect to PtSe2 in different thicknesses; (c) The sensitivities of the proposed biochemical sensors with 2.0 nm PtSe2 vary with the refractive indices of sensing medium on Ag film and Au film, respectively; (d) Variation of quality factors with respect to the thickness of PtSe2 varying from 0 to 7 nm of PtSe2 biosensor.
Figure 5. (a) Electric field distributions for the PtSe2 on Ag film and Au film sensors; (b) Variation of sensitivity with respect to PtSe2 in different thicknesses; (c) The sensitivities of the proposed biochemical sensors with 2.0 nm PtSe2 vary with the refractive indices of sensing medium on Ag film and Au film, respectively; (d) Variation of quality factors with respect to the thickness of PtSe2 varying from 0 to 7 nm of PtSe2 biosensor.
Sensors 20 00131 g005
Table
Table 1. Change in thickness of PtSe2, layer numbers (L), highest sensitivity (S), minimum resonance angle (θmin) at ns = 1.33, and resonance angle change (Δθ) from ns = 1.330 to ns = 1.335. The smallest reflectivity (Rmin), full width at half-maximum (FWHM), and figure of merit (FOM) is at ns = 1.33, and detection accuracy (DA) is at ns = 1.33 to ns = 1.34 for the PtSe2 SPR biochemical sensors.
Table 1. Change in thickness of PtSe2, layer numbers (L), highest sensitivity (S), minimum resonance angle (θmin) at ns = 1.33, and resonance angle change (Δθ) from ns = 1.330 to ns = 1.335. The smallest reflectivity (Rmin), full width at half-maximum (FWHM), and figure of merit (FOM) is at ns = 1.33, and detection accuracy (DA) is at ns = 1.33 to ns = 1.34 for the PtSe2 SPR biochemical sensors.
PtSe2 Thickness (nm)LS (◦/RIU)θmin (Degree)Δθ (Degree)Rmin (a. u.)FWHMDAFOM
AgWithout PtSe20011867.640.590.02691.480.79779.72
PtSe22.0512869.140.640.10963.150.406340.63
3.3913970.490.690.29515.610.247724.77
4.41214771.900.730.48379.170.160316.03
5.31415672.840.780.54879.960.156615.66
6.11616273.860.810.604310.850.149314.93
AuWithout PtSe20013069.570.650.00633.730.348534.85
PtSe22.0514471.400.720.05556.490.221822.18
3.3915673.010.780.18089.740.160116.01
4.41216574.690.820.351511.680.141214.12
Table
Table 2. The optimized layers, change in resonance angle (Δθ), highest sensitivity (S), and reference.
Table 2. The optimized layers, change in resonance angle (Δθ), highest sensitivity (S), and reference.
Layers in the StructureΔθ (Degree)S (◦/RIU)Reference
Ag, 5 nm black phosphorus0.90181[50]
Ag, 5 nm BP, 5 L graphene1.08217[50]
Ag, 5 nm BP, 1 L MoS21.09218[50]
Ag, 5 nm BP, 1 L WS21.18237[50]
Au, 4 L MoS2, Au, 1 L graphene0.91182[20]
Ag, 6.1 nm PtSe20.81162This work
Au, 4.4 nm PtSe20.82165This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Saeed, M.; Cai, H. Sensitivity Enhancement of a Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor with Platinum Diselenide. Sensors 2020, 20, 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010131

AMA Style

Jia Y, Li Z, Wang H, Saeed M, Cai H. Sensitivity Enhancement of a Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor with Platinum Diselenide. Sensors. 2020; 20(1):131. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010131

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Yue, Zhongfu Li, Haiqi Wang, Muhammad Saeed, and Houzhi Cai. 2020. "Sensitivity Enhancement of a Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor with Platinum Diselenide" Sensors 20, no. 1: 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010131

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop