Open AccessReview

Tracking Detectors in Low-Energy Nuclear Physics: An Overview

Jelena Vesić

Department of Low and Medium Energy Physics (F2), Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Quantum Beam Sci. 2024, 8(3), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030024

Submission received: 25 June 2024 / Revised: 12 August 2024 / Accepted: 15 August 2024 / Published: 3 September 2024

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantum Beam Science: Feature Papers 2024)

Browse Figures

Versions Notes

Abstract

Advances in accelerator technology have enabled the use of exotic and intense radioactive ion beams. Enhancements to tracking detectors are necessary to accommodate increased particle rates. Recent advancements in digital electronics have led to the construction or planning of next-generation detectors. To conduct kinematically complete measurements, it is essential to track and detect all particles produced as a result of the reaction. Furthermore, the need for high-precision physics experiments has led to significant developments in the detector field. In recent years, highly efficient and highly granular tracking detectors have been developed. These detectors significantly enhance the physics programme at dedicated facilities. An overview of charged-particle tracking detectors in low-energy nuclear physics will be given.

Keywords:

tracking detectors; nuclear physics; RIB; detector array

1. Introduction

The most general definition of tracking detectors is that they are instruments designed to accurately measure and reconstruct the path, or “track”, taken by a particle. Momentum measurements can be obtained by applying a magnetic field that is perpendicular to the direction of motion of a particle in a tracking detector. Calorimeters use energy loss phenomena to determine the energy of particles traversing through them. Tracking detectors play a crucial role in nuclear physics. They are used to determine the trajectory, momentum, and energy of traversing particles. The desired physics constraints on tracking detectors are high resolution (both temporal and spatial), high efficiency, the possibility to sustain high counting rates, and radiation hardness. These constraints have sparked the development of high-precision detectors and novel experimental techniques for the spectroscopy of γ-rays and particles. Several detector technologies have been developed and are being continuously improved. The most important ones are gas-based detectors, scintillator-based detectors, and semiconductor-based detectors. We aim to present a general overview of charged-particle tracking detectors. In our opinion, this kind of review was missing in low-energy nuclear physics. A careful curation of the vast literature was needed, considering the limited space, and is possibly influenced by our personal experimental experience and preferences.

2. Tracking Detectors

2.1. Gas-Based Detectors

In the following, we will introduce the basic working principle of the most commonly used gaseous detectors. Gaseous tracking detectors employ the ionising effect of charged particles in a gas volume. The simplest type of gas detector is the Geiger–Müller counter, which consists of a tube with a single wire in the centre. A few kilovolts of the voltage difference between the tube wall and the wire induces the movement of primary electrons towards the anode (wire) and ions towards the cathode (tube wall). Due to the high field strength in proximity to the wire, the primary electrons produce an avalanche of secondary electrons. The multiwire proportional chamber (MWPC) is a thin cuboid volume of gas. It comprises a set of thin, evenly spaced anode wires that are positioned symmetrically between two cathode planes. Electrons generated within the gas volume due to an ionising event move along the lines of the electric field towards the high field region near the anode wires, where the process of avalanche multiplication could occur, allowing for the precise measurement of both time and position [1]. A time projection chamber (TPC) comprises a detection volume filled with gas in an electric field and is equipped with a position-sensitive electron collection system. A charged particle traversing the chamber ionises the gas, and the electrons travel along the field lines towards the end plates, where both the point and the time of arrival are measured. A track generates a dense string of space points. The position sensors at the end plates can be wire chambers or micro-pattern gas detectors. The first micro-pattern gas detector was the microstrip gas detector, in which wires were replaced by microscopic metal strip structures deposited on high-resistivity substrates. Other developments are the Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) [2] and Micromesh Gaseous Structure (Micromegas) chambers [3,4,5]. The GEM is composed of a thin polymer foil coated with metal, which is chemically pierced with a large number of closely spaced holes (usually ranging from 50 to 100/mm²). When a voltage difference is applied between the two electrodes, electrons that are produced by the passage of the charged particle on one side of the structure move towards the holes, undergo multiplication, and are then transferred to a collection region. Each hole functions as an independent proportional amplifier. The GEM can function autonomously as a detector or serve as a preamplifier inside a complex configuration. Micromegas detectors were invented in the 1990s, and they have since gained significant popularity in the fields of particle and nuclear physics. The detectors consist of two distinct regions divided by a micromesh. The first region is a drift gap spanning several mm, characterised by a low electric field. The second region is an amplification gap spanning several tens of microns, characterised by a high electric field. When a charged particle traverses the gaseous detector, it primarily liberates ionisation electrons within the drift gap. The particles drift towards the micromesh and are then transferred to the amplification gap, where they undergo a process called avalanche multiplication. Therefore, a signal can be detected either on the micromesh or on certain strips located on the other side of the amplification gap, facing the mesh. The fast charge collection results in exceptional timing characteristics and the ability to handle high counting rates.

The GEM-TPC detector [6] is a crucial component of the Superconducting Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) [7] particle identification system. It is capable of providing position information at a counting rate of up to 1 MHz with a spatial resolution of 1 mm. Additionally, it has a tracking efficiency larger than 95%. This detector is specifically developed to offer precise tracking information of the beam, covering a wide range of projectiles, from protons to uranium. The present iteration of Super-FRS GEM-TPC [6] comprises two Gas Electron Multiplier Time Projection Chambers (GEM-TPCs) housed within a single vessel. These chambers function autonomously and have opposing electrical drift fields. The twin configuration is achieved by performing a mirror flip of one of the GEM-TPCs along the middle plane with respect to the second one. The GEM-TPC consists of three main components: a field cage [8], a GEM stack, and front-end electronics. The GEM stack serves as an amplification stage and is composed of three GEM foils that are separated by a distance of 2 mm each. This arrangement creates two transfer gaps and one induction gap. The last one is positioned between the third GEM foil and the anode strip plane. The operational concept relies on the production of primary electrons in the working gas following the passage of projectiles. The subsequent movement of these electrons, inside a very uniform electric field in the field cage, is directed towards the anode strips. Upon arrival, signals are generated like those of a standard TPC. However, the primary distinction is in the amplification stage, where the GEM-TPC utilises [9] a triple GEM stack, which allows for modulating the gain. The most recent test of the Super-FRS GEM-TPC detector was performed at the Fragment Separator (FRS) [10] with a uranium beam with an energy of 850 MeV/u and an intensity of up to 1000 ions/spill [6]. A spatial resolution of 0.74–0.81 mm, a detection efficiency > 99%, and a tracking efficiency >96% were reported. The layout of the Super-FRS GEM-TPC detector is shown in Figure 1.

R3B stands for “Reactions with Relativistic Radioactive Beams”. A NUSTAR (Nuclear Structure, Astrophysics, and Reactions) collaboration performs inverse kinematics nuclear physics experiments. R3B has a setup with a high efficiency, acceptance, and resolution for kinematically complete measurements of reactions with high-energy radioactive beams. Straws are cylindrical tubes filled with gas and have a conductive inner layer serving as the cathode and an anode wire stretched along the cylinder axis. Each Straw Tube Wall (STW) of the Proton Arm Spectrometer (PAS) [11,12] of the R3B collaboration will comprise three layers of straw tubes that are filled with a gas mixture at an overpressure of approximately 1 bar. A PAS is being developed to accurately track the trajectories of evaporated protons. The tubes are bonded together, with each layer being offset by one tube radius from the preceding layer. For an orthogonal proton track, the detection efficiency is lower near the tube wall but higher in the centre of the straw in the following layer. One plane will be constructed using Mylar tubes with a wall thickness of 60 µm, while the remaining three planes will be made from ultrathin aluminium tubes with a maximum wall thickness of 300 µm. While the angular straggling induced by these tubes is greater than that of the thin Mylar tubes, their impact on the angular resolution will be less due to their proximity to the end of the track. The positional accuracy is anticipated to range from 100 to 200 μm [11].

Resistive Plate Chambers (RPCs) have undergone significant development in recent years, emerging as a viable alternative to plastic scintillator technology for applications requiring large surface coverage. An RPC [13] is composed of two high resistive parallel plates: a positively charged anode and a negatively charged cathode. Both plates are separated by a thin volume of gas. An ionizing charged particle traversing the gap creates a charge pair in the gas volume. The charge produced in the gap drifts towards the electrodes, and they induce charge in the pickup strips placed on the outer surface of the plates. One of the latest advancements in R3B detection systems is a multigap RPC [14]. R3B multigap RPC aims to accurately measure the momentum of protons emitted in the forward direction (using the time of flight (TOF) method). It consists of two multigap RPC modules. Each RPC module has six gas gaps. In total, an RPC detector contains twelve gaps (nylon monofilaments) measuring 0.3 mm each and is read by strips with a pitch of 30 mm. The RPC was integrated into the FAIR Phase 0 experiment and had the specific objective of measuring nucleon–nucleon short-range correlations (SRC) inside an exotic nucleus (¹⁶C). Due to the detector’s excellent timing precision, the determination of the momentum of forward-emitted protons with a resolution of around 1% was possible. The RPC had an efficiency of over 95% and a time precision better than 100 ps (which takes into account the contribution of a reference scintillator and the momentum spread of the particles) for forward-emitted particles. A schematic sketch of the working principle of a general multigap RPC detector is shown in Figure 2.

Large multistep position-sensitive multiwire proportional counters (MWPCs) have been developed to detect fission fragments [15,16]. These experiments are conducted using a versatile scattering chamber at the Inter University Accelerator Centre (IUAC) [17], New Delhi, India. The developed MWPC detectors have position sensitivity, providing information about both the horizontal and vertical positions of the particles that hit them. The detectors have an active area of 20 × 10 cm². The utilisation of a five-electrode geometry results in significant amplification at low pressures, enabling the generation of a fast-timing signal. Additionally, it facilitates the measurement of differential energy loss, allowing for the effective discrimination between light and heavy particles. A timing resolution of 1.7 ns (FWHM) and a position resolution of 1.1 mm (FWHM) were obtained.

2.1.1. Secondary Electron Detectors

Upcoming facilities such as FAIR (Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany) [18] and SPIRAL2 (The Système de Production d’Ions Radioactifs en Ligne de 2e generation) [19] will provide low-energy beams of radioactive isotopes with energies below 10 MeV/nucleon. The emittance of these new beams will necessitate the use of beam tracking detectors to accurately recreate the precise impact position of the nuclei on the experimental target. Nevertheless, due to their thickness, conventional detectors produce a significant amount of energy and angular straggling. To overcome that, the SE (secondary electron) detector concept can be used. The fundamental concepts of emissive foil detectors have been understood since the 1960s [20]. The primary advantage of these detectors is that only the thin, emissive foil is in the path of the ions. This, in turn, minimises energy and angular straggling. The SE detector consists of two main parts: the emissive foil and the secondary electron detector. The emissive foil is a thin film of material, typically made of carbon or Mylar, positioned along the path of ions. The incoming ions cause the ejection of secondary electrons from the foil [21]. The electrons are then directed towards a secondary electron detector. The SE detector provides information on the time and position of the secondary electrons, allowing for the determination of the ion’s trajectory through the detector. Low-pressure gaseous detectors are frequently employed in nuclear physics since the detector operation at low pressure enables the use of thin windows.

A schematic depiction of an SE detector coupled with a gaseous one is shown in Figure 3. The SE detector reported in [22] has a comparable design to MWPC; it uses a thin emissive foil that is connected to a low-pressure gas chamber. The SED is not allocated along the path of the beam; instead, it identifies the cloud of secondary electrons ejected from an emissive foil. Both an electric field and a magnetic field direct the secondary electrons from the foil to the detector. The magnetic field is necessary to achieve a good position resolution [23]. The detector had a large effective area of 40 × 10 cm² and a thickness of only 250 mg/cm² (aluminised Mylar). It showed a good time and position resolution of 300 ps (FWHM, for heavy ions) and 1.4 mm (FWHM), respectively. The position resolution improved to 1 mm (FWHM) when using a smaller detector [22]. Additionally, it was reported that thinner foils, as low as 50 mg/cm² (carbon foils), can be used to further minimise straggling. The SE detector was used in VAMOS (VAriable MOde Spectrometer) [24] experiments with fission fragments. The performances of SE detectors in low-pressure conditions were comparable to, or even superior to, those achieved under atmospheric pressure.

The advantages of wire chambers have been repeatedly established, particularly at normal pressure rather than at low pressure. The objective of the study in [25] was to assess the operational capabilities of the wire chamber detector under low-pressure conditions (several Torr) and to compare its performance with that of traditional wire chambers. Wire chambers are highly effective when operated under low-pressure conditions [26]. Significant progress has been made in enhancing the time resolution of Micromegas detectors operating at low pressure (about 4 Torr). A series of Micromegas detectors were tested in the laboratory under low-pressure conditions, revealing a good time resolution of 130 ± 30 ps, comparable to the findings reported from wire chambers [25]. The successful results achieved in prior experiments, which demonstrated high counting rate capabilities and excellent time resolution, have inspired the development of a new real-size 2D prototype wire chamber and a 2D bulk Micromegas operating at low pressure [27]. The spatial resolution of the Micromegas in the SE detector configuration was tested for the first time at low pressure (below 20 mbar) [27]. Various tests were conducted to analyse both prototypes’ time and spatial properties. The spatial resolution in the horizontal (X) direction was found to be 0.90 (0.02) mm (FWHM) for the real-size prototype and 0.72 (0.08) mm (FWHM) for Micromegas. For the real-size prototype, the time resolution was approximately 110 (25) ps. The specification requirements for the SE detectors are 150 ps for time resolution and 1 mm (FWHM) for spatial resolution for experiments to be performed at S3-LEB (The Super Separator Spectrometer, Low Energy Branch, GANIL [27]). Spatial resolution requirements are set by the demand for the spectrometer to reach a mass resolution of 1/300, which is directly dependent on the SE detector’s trajectory reconstruction.

Although it is not a gas-based detector, for the sake of completeness, the MCP-based SE detector will be presented in the following. Super-FRS at FAIR will produce unique exotic beams at relativistic energies. Slowing down these ions (using the degrader) will allow for experiments to be performed at the Coulomb barrier. The HISPEC-10 project aims to use exotic beams with energies of 5–10 MeV/u for spectroscopy studies. The experiments at these energies have an advantage over higher-beam energy (HISPEC) experiments because of the larger angular momentum transfer. In addition, transfer, resonance, and fusion evaporation reactions can be used to explore realms of the nuclear landscape. The detectors employed for the tracking of trajectory and measuring the velocity after the degrader should be as thin as possible to avoid any further energy and angular straggling of the beam. In addition, the tracking detectors should be large enough to cover the whole angular distribution of the slowed-down beam. Two thin transmission-type detectors, MCP (Microchannel Plate)-based, are planned to be used to track slowed-down fragments [28]. The ions impinging the foils produce secondary electrons that are then accelerated towards the MCP, where the electrons are multiplied. The position of the produced electron avalanche is measured via a dual delay line (DDL). Permanent magnets are employed to compel the electrons to follow circular trajectories due to the substantial distance between the foil and the MCP.

2.1.2. Active Targets

At present, radioactive beams with energy ranging from below the Coulomb barrier to several hundred MeV/nucleon are available. These beams allow for a wide range of research on nuclei located near the drip line. To address the difference in intensity between secondary and primary beams, thick targets and high-efficiency detection methods are required. To tackle these challenges, a type of detector known as an active target detector was created. This detector uses the detector gas as the target, and the ability to accurately determine the reaction vertex in three dimensions enables high resolution even when dealing with thick targets. The reaction products can be measured over nearly 4π angle. The use of active targets and TPCs in nuclear physics experiments spans over a few decades [29,30,31,32]. By employing the detecting medium as a target for nuclear reactions, it is possible to track charged particles, determine the location of reaction points, and subsequently compensate for the energy lost by charged particles within the target. The IKAR configuration at GSI (GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung) served as the initial active target for nuclear physics experiments [32]. Over time, these kinds of detection systems showed better performance than traditional experimental methods because they could identify particles and track them in three dimensions. In addition, they could detect relatively low amounts of energy. Thanks to recent advancements in micro-pattern gaseous detectors (MPGDs) [33,34] as well as the development of electronics (such as the General Electronics for TPCs project (GET) [35]) and data acquisition (DAQ) systems with high data throughput and front-end data processing capabilities, modern active targets and time projection chambers can now achieve much higher channel densities than previously thought possible. At the same time, the need for active targets and time projection chambers in the nuclear physics community has significantly increased due to the ongoing improvements in the generation and acceleration of short-lived beams of rare isotopes at radioactive ion beam (RIB) facilities worldwide.

The ACTive TARget and Time Projection Chamber (ACTAR TPC, Caen, France) is a novel detector created through a partnership of European laboratories and constructed at GANIL (Caen, France). The first iteration of it, the ACTAR TPC demonstrator, was designed at the Institute de Physique Nucléaire d’Orsay (IPNO). The base geometry of the detector consists of an aluminium inner skeleton whose central volume is 300 × 250 × 210 mm³. The double field cage of the ACTAR TPC demonstrator apparatus is shown in Figure 4. The ACTAR TPC detector followed the construction of two 8-times smaller demonstrator [36]. It involves a charge projection plane that is divided into 128 × 128 square pads measuring 2 × 2 mm² [37]. These pads are connected to the GET system. The GET system allows for the digitisation of the signal at several frequencies selected by the user. A commissioning experiment using resonant scattering of an ¹⁸O beam on an isobutane gas (proton) target was performed [38]. The ¹H(¹⁸O, ¹⁸O)¹H and ¹H(¹⁸O, ¹⁵N)⁴He reaction channels were studied. The reaction channels could be differentiated by the scattered heavy ions in their ground state. The excitation functions in both channels were reconstructed and analysed to determine the centre-of-mass (cms) energy resolutions. The (p, p) channel resolved had a 38(4) keV FWHM, whereas the (p, α) channel had a resolution of 54(9) keV FWHM. Simulations indicated that the resolution is mostly determined by the angular resolution, which is in turn primarily influenced by the straggling of the ions in the gas. The latter could be reduced by substituting the isobutane gas target with pure hydrogen. The obtained resolution is similar to the 45 keV cms energy resolution obtained by the Active-Target Time Projection Chamber (AT-TPC) at Michigan State University. This resolution was measured for the ¹H(⁴⁶Ar, ⁴⁶Ar)¹H reaction [39].

The AT-TPC [39,40] was recently constructed and put into operation at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL) [41] at Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. The AT-TPC is positioned within a 2T solenoidal magnetic field, which causes the paths of charged particles to bend. This bending increases the length of their tracks within the detector and allows for a more precise determination of their energy by measuring magnetic rigidity. The AT-TPC is equipped with GET electronics. In the commissioning experiment of the AT-TPC, isobaric analogue states of ⁴⁷Ar in the excitation function of the elastic scattering reaction ⁴⁶Ar(p, p) in inverse kinematics [42] were measured. Using active target technology, excitation functions across a wide energy range were obtained. This was achieved with a cms energy resolution of 46 keV. A higher acceptance of scattering angles by using a true global multiplicity trigger module is expected. In addition, the increased density of proton scattering centres in pure hydrogen gas will improve the statistics of future proton scattering experiments. This improvement is made possible by the installation of a new thick GEM device in front of the Micromegas in the AT-TPC, which provides additional electron amplification [43].

Magic Numbers Off Stability (MINOS) focuses [44] on the spectroscopy of exotic nuclei using proton-knockout reactions. MINOS employs a thick liquid hydrogen target [45] to enhance the luminosity, together with a vertex tracker to maintain accurate vertex resolution for Doppler correction or momentum resolution in in-beam or invariant mass spectroscopy studies, respectively. The vertex tracker is a TPC that has been hollowed out to form a cylindrical shape. It is equipped with a Micromegas detection pad plane that surrounds the target. During a proton-knockout reaction, such as a (p, 2p) reaction, the protons that are knocked out cause ionisation of the gas as they pass through the TPC. The ionised electrons then go towards the detection area, where the signal is enhanced and subsequently recorded by specialised electronics.

The ATS (Active Target for SPES) project at INFN-LNL [46] will offer a reduced-scale ACTAR TPC detector that is optimised for the post-accelerated exotic beams provided by the SPES (Selective Production of Exotic Species [47]) facility. Meanwhile, the SPECMAT project [48], installed at ISOLDE (The Isotope mass Separator On-Line facility [49]), will use the cylindrical configuration and magnetic field provided by the ISS (ISOLDE Solenoidal Spectrometer) facility to facilitate high-efficiency studies of inverse kinematics direct reactions.

TACTIC stands for the “TRIUMF Annular Chamber for Tracking and Identification of Charged-particles” [50]. TACTIC is a cylindrical, active-target TPC that offers a high level of detection efficiency. It incorporates a “shielding” cathode that captures the ionisation produced by the beam, enabling larger intensities compared to standard TPCs. The 480 anode signals are collected via specialised electronics. The amplification of small signals is achieved by the utilisation of a GEM. The He-CO₂ fill gas serves the dual purpose of particle detection and provides a uniform and adjustable target for investigating reactions on alpha particles, such as in ⁸Li(α,n)¹¹B reaction.

2.2. Scintillator-Based Detectors

A scintillation detector comprises a scintillator crystal that is connected to an electronic light sensor, usually a photomultiplier tube (PMT), and more recently, a silicon photomultiplier (SiPM). They convert emitted light photons from the scintillator into an electrical pulse. Despite the utilisation of newer materials such as LaBr₃(Ce), scintillator detectors are still unable to compete with the energy resolution of Ge detectors. In general, we can categorize scintillators into two groups: organic and inorganic. The choice of scintillator depends on the specific type of incident particle to be measured. Organic scintillators have excellent pulse shape discrimination. They are mainly used to detect neutrons or charged particles. Due to the low density of organic scintillators, inorganic ones are the preferred ones when measuring X-rays or γ-rays. Scintillator arrays are often employed in physics cases that require superb timing resolution and fast charged particle identification.

To conduct kinematically complete measurements, it is essential to detect all particles produced as a result of the reaction. Every event necessitates the individual detection of photons, neutrons, light-charged particles, and heavy residues. The Time-of-Flight Detector (TofD detector) [51] is an integral component of the R3B experimental setup. Its purpose is to determine TOF and nuclear charge (Z) of heavy fragments following the reaction in the target. Accurate measurements of the fragments’ energy loss (E) as they travel through the scintillator material determine the nuclear charge of reaction products. TofD should detect heavy-ion residues of all charges at relativistic energies. A sophisticated particle tracking system can accurately identify relativistic ions ranging from hydrogen to uranium in terms of mass and nuclear charge. For Pb fragments, it is necessary to have a relative nuclear charge precision (σZ/Z) of less than 0.4% to distinguish Z from Z-1. This imposes an energy-loss measurement with a relative precision σΔE/ΔE better than 1% [51]. Another constraint on the performance of the new ToFD arises from the need to accurately identify residues based on their mass. Furthermore, the main obstacle arises from determining the heaviest residues in the Pb-U region, where the relative mass difference between adjacent nuclei is approximately 0.5%. To resolve the masses, the relative uncertainty in mass must be less than 2 · 10⁻³. To achieve the needed mass resolution, it is necessary to measure the TOF of the heaviest residues with a relative error of less than 2 · 10⁻⁴ (σ) at an average beam energy of 1 GeV/nucleon (γ ∼ 2). With a flight path of around 20 m, the TOF precision for nuclei in the Pb-U region at 1 GeV/nucleon kinetic energy better than 14 ps is needed. In addition, the ToFD detector must maintain its performance even when exposed to high beam rates of up to 1 · 10⁶ pps (particles per second). The TofD detector has an active surface area measuring 1200 × 1000 mm² and comprises four planes of scintillators. The mechanical design of the TofD detector is shown in Figure 5; each plane features 44 vertical scintillator bars, each measuring 27 × 1000 × 5 mm³. PMTs are used to readout each bar on both far ends. The width of each bar is adjusted to match the dimensions of a PMT to eliminate the need for light guides. This allows for a direct connection between the scintillator bars and the PMTs, hence maximizing the efficiency of light collection. The initial results from the in-beam measurements conducted in the FAIR Phase-0 programme demonstrated that the desired objectives, namely achieving a precision of σΔE/ΔE < 1% in energy loss and a precision of σt/t < 0.02% in time, have been accomplished [51]. This enables the complete identification of heavy ions up to the lead-uranium region in terms of mass and nuclear charge, in conjunction with a sophisticated particle tracking system. It is worth mentioning that the detector array NeuLAND (New Large-Area Neutron Detector, Darmstadt, Germany) is employed for the identification of high-energy neutrons within the 200–1000 MeV range, and it also consists of plastic scintillators [52]. Neutrons can engage in hadronic scattering with the scintillator material, resulting in the production of charged particles. These charged particles can then be identified by their scintillation light. The detector’s high granularity enables precise reconstruction of the primary interaction points of the neutron.

The NUSTAR collaboration, HISPEC/DESPEC (High Resolution In-Flight Spectroscopy/Decay Spectroscopy, FAIR, Darmstadt, Germany), aims to investigate nuclear structure, reactions, and astrophysics questions using high-resolution in-flight spectroscopy (HISPEC) and stopped-beam experiments (DESPEC) at the FRS in FAIR Phase-0 and the future at the Super-FRS. Particle identification at RIB facilities requires TOF detectors that provide the optimum time resolution and a high rate capacity [53]. One potential approach being explored by the HISPEC/DESPEC collaboration involves using a segmented plastic scintillator as the TOF detector for the high rates (of the order of MHz). Two versions of this detector, named FINGER, have already been built, put into operation, and used for various experiments in the FRS/GSI. The readout is at both ends, using PMTs [54]. The detector’s initial design consisted of 15 strips of BC420 plastic scintillator measuring 14 × 100 × 1 mm³. A second detector with improved segmentation was constructed based on the results gained from the previous detector. That version was composed of 51 strips of BC420 material, each measuring 4.4 × 100 × 1 mm³. Because of its segmentation, the detector was able to handle rates higher than 10⁶ pps and had an intrinsic timing resolution below 40 ps (σ) [55,56]. Moreover, the small segment size enabled the determination of position information, which can be used for particle identification. The increased momentum acceptance of the Super-FRS compared to the FRS necessitates the construction of a third iteration of this detector, which will cover a larger area [57]. This requirement can be met by augmenting the quantity of strips, hence increasing the number of PMTs required and the intricacy of the mechanical design. SiPMs have been considered the replacement for PMTs. SiPMs have been developed as a contemporary alternative to PMTs. Studies have demonstrated that SiPMs have several advantages, including their insensitivity to magnetic fields (allowing for the use of scintillators in the proximity of magnetic spectrometers), cost-effectiveness, and lower voltage requirements [58,59]. Furthermore, they are capable of achieving time resolutions similar to those achieved with PMTs [60,61]. An effective method to address the significant segmentation of modern TOF detectors is to employ SiPMs as the readout. A prototype device composed of plastic scintillator strips measuring 4.4 × 100 × 1 mm³ was tested [62]. The device was equipped with SiPMs of two different sizes for readout at both ends. The test was conducted using a ¹²⁴Xe beam with an energy of 600 MeV/nucleon. The timing and time-over-threshold (ToT) data were extracted. The time resolution of the prototype was found to vary depending on the applied voltage and the size of the SiPM. By optimising the voltage, the achieved resolutions of 14.3 (1) ps and 10.4 (1) ps were for SiPMs measuring 1 × 1 mm² and 3 × 3 mm², respectively. The results indicated that the SiPMs are appropriate for use as readout devices for plastic scintillators in RIB facilities.

βPlastic [63] is an HISPEC/DESPEC fast plastic detector designed for detecting particles within the energy range of 80 keV to 8 MeV. Each plastic detector consists of a 3 mm thick quadrilateral sheet made of scintillating plastic material (type BC-404) that is connected to 3 × 3 mm² SiPMs (of the SensL C-Series [64]) along the four sides. The exceptional timing characteristics of these scintillating detectors enable the precise measurement of time information for decays occurring from implanted ions in AIDA (The Advanced Implantation Detector Array, see Section 2.3).

The compact and uniquely designed start time detector T0 [65] was specifically designed for monitoring hypernuclear particles in the WASA (Wide-Angle Shower Apparatus)—FRS HypHI experiment at GSI [66,67]. It uses plastic scintillators that are read by the Multi-Pixel Photon Counter (MPPC) also known as the SiPM. Even under high photon flux, the MPPC has exceptional timing resolution, and its compact dimensions allow for the creation of a small and fast detector when combined with small plastic scintillators. The detector’s TOF resolution has been examined in relation to the overvoltage and breakdown voltage of a maximum counting rate of roughly 3 × 10⁶ pps per segment and a maximum beam charge of Z = 6. The TOF resolutions between adjacent segments of the detector varied from 44.6 ± 1.3 ps to 100.3 ± 3.6 ps (σ). The specific resolution depended on factors such as the segment, overvoltage values, and beam intensity. The resolution of the TOF between adjacent segments of the T0 counter has been studied concerning several operational factors, including overvoltage, counting rates, and beam atomic charges. The results indicate that the measured TOF resolutions for various adjacent segment combinations of the T0 counter are better than 86.0 ± 1.4 ps when exposed to ⁶Li beams with beam intensities below 100 kHz. The estimated TOF resolutions of different segment combinations varied by a maximum difference of 41.4 ± 1.9 ps.

CsI(TI) detectors are a natural choice for the investigation of reaction dynamics. The study of charged particle energy spectra, specifically the emission of light-charged particles like protons and alphas, allows for the investigation of the properties of heavy-ion-induced fusion and fusion–fission reactions near the Coulomb barrier. The setup at IUAC New Delhi utilises a detector system consisting of 16 CsI(TI) detectors, each with dimensions of 20 mm by 20 mm and a thickness of 3 mm [16]. A thickness of this extent is adequate for stopping protons with energies of up to 25 MeV, as well as alphas with energies of up to 100 MeV. The alpha energy spectra region of interest for the aforementioned physics goals spans from 4 to 30 MeV, while the proton energy spectra region of interest ranges from 2 to 20 MeV. The crystals are connected to the 10 mm × 10 mm photodiode using a square-shaped (non-tapered) plexiglass light guide that has dimensions of 20 mm × 20 mm × 7 mm. The front surface of the crystal is coated with a 2 μm layer of Mylar that has been aluminised on both sides.

The DIAMANT [68,69] is a highly granular and compact array made of CsI(Tl) scintillators. It is designed to be positioned at the centre of a gamma ray array such as AGATA (The Advanced GAmma Tracking Array [70]). This instrument is used for the detection of light-charged particles, such as alpha particles, protons, or deuterons, that are emitted during fusion–evaporation or transfer reactions. The array comprises a variable number of CsI(Tl) scintillators, ranging from 64 to 96, depending on the setup. Each of the detectors is equipped with charge-sensitive preamplifiers that operate in a vacuum. The preamplifiers are installed on a flexible printed circuit board (PCB) called FlexiBoard, which also serves as a self-supporting framework for the array. The primary component of DIAMANT is a rhombicuboctahedron, with two opposing square faces left vacant to allow for the passage of the beam. The FlexiBoard may be unfolded from its quasi-spherical form, allowing easy access to the detectors. Downstream of the main structure, there are additional sets of detectors known as ForwardWall and ChessBoard. These sets consist of 8 and 24 detectors, respectively. Their purpose is to enhance the level of granularity in the forward direction of the array. The DIAMANT was recently successfully integrated with the EAGLE [71] and NEDA [72] detection systems for the first time. The physics case for the commissioning and initial experiment was selected to be ⁵⁷Cu [73]. The case was selected to study an intricate balance between individual and collective motion within the atomic nucleus.

DAPPER stands for Detector Array for Photons, Protons, and Exotic Residues [74]. DAPPER is specifically developed to measure the properties of products resulting from (d,p) reactions conducted in inverse kinematics. DAPPER uses proton kinetic energy to determine excitation energy. It employs an array consisting of 128 BaF₂ scintillators to measure the gamma ray multiplicity, total gamma ray energy, and the energy of each gamma ray. The photon strength function is derived from these data. The (d,p) reaction serves as a substitute method for measuring nuclei that cannot be measured using the (n, γ) reaction. DAPPER’s data provide constraints for predictive models of neutron capture.

Scintillating fibre detectors combine the speed and efficiency of plastic scintillators with the geometric flexibility and hermeticity provided by fibre technology. Fibres convert the ionisation energy deposited by a passing charged particle into optical photons and guide the optical signal to the photo sensors. The fibres are usually coupled to SiPMs.

The R3B setup intends to use five detecting systems that rely on plastic scintillator fibres for in-beam tracking [11,75]. The mass number A of beam-like particles can be calculated by analysing the deflection of the beam in a magnetic field B, which follows the relation Bρ~A/Z. To determine the radius of the trajectories in the magnetic field, it is necessary to measure the position of the particles at different positions. Three fibre detectors with an active area of 10 × 10 cm² will be used for position measurements before and after the target. These fibre detectors will be used to replace the Si detectors in tests with a high beam rate of the order of MHz. The detectors will be composed of square fibres measuring 0.2 × 0.2 mm², arranged in both the x and y directions to provide two-dimensional position measurements. A 40 cm wide fibre detector with a single layer of fibres (only measuring x-position) will be used for the initial position measurement following the magnet. This measurement will act as the reference point for determining the deflection angle. The distance between this detector and the subsequent position measurement is usually several metres, resulting in an angular measurement that is a small fraction of a mrad. Nevertheless, the primary factor influencing the measurement of the angle after the magnet is the angular straggling in the material of the detector. A larger fibre detector (measuring 120 × 80 cm²) positioned at the end of the flight path is intended to be used.

The next-generation in-flight magnetic separator, Super-FRS, necessitates the use of advanced tracking detectors. Planar detectors composed of scintillating fibres are a reasonable choice due to their reasonable cost, as well as their fast response and high-rate capability. The SciFib prototype [76] comprised 128 fibres with a quadratic cross-section measuring 0.2 × 0.2 mm². These fibres were connected to two MPPC arrays for the light collection that were then readout using an MPPC ReadOut Board (ROB) designed in GSI. The widths of the two reconstructed horizontal position distributions were comparable to the width observed with the standard FRS TPC detector, up to a rate of 10^{4 197}Au/spill.

In decay spectroscopy experiments, ions are usually stopped in an active implanter, and their subsequent decays are measured. The active implanter’s role is to provide implantation times and positions and then detect the times and positions of subsequent decaying particles (α or β) while providing rough energy information to distinguish the decay processes. For fast timing measurements and neutron detection, for example, a time resolution of the implantation detectors lower than 1 ns and the capability to detect and distinguish between ion implantation and subsequent decays are needed. Scintillating fibres are used for a Fibre IMPlanter (FIMP) prototype of the HISPEC/DESPEC to fulfil these requirements [77]. The FIMP prototype consists of stacked layers of orthogonally running fibre mats. The working principle is based on the assumption that β and α particles (or their associated secondary electrons) will hit at least one fibre in each of two consecutive layers so that complete position information is available.

2.3. Semiconductor-Based Detectors

Semiconductor tracking detectors mostly consist of thin silicon wafers with a thickness ranging from 20 µm to a few mm. The n-type silicon is processed by photolithographic methods to create p+-doped implants on one side of the wafer, forming pn junctions. In the case of silicon strip detectors, the implants are strips. Each strip is connected to a readout channel. The detector achieves full depletion with the application of a bias voltage. As a charged particle moves across the wafer, it generates electron–hole pairs along its trajectory. The electrons and holes migrate towards the electrodes and generate signals on the readout electrodes. Two-dimensional (2D) measurements can be obtained by implanting strips on the back side of the wafer, either perpendicular to the ones on the front surface or at a different stereo angle.

The R3B Si-tracker [78] will encompass the target volume and detect light-charged particles, such as protons. The current detector technology uses double-sided silicon strip sensors that are wire-bonded to the specially designed R3B-ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit). The vacuum vessel can accommodate a maximum of three layers simultaneously, consisting of one inner layer and two exterior layers. The three layers consist of a total of 30 detectors, with 6 in the core layer and 12 in each of the two outer layers. The entire sensitive area is approximately 0.56 m², and there are 116,736 front-end channels. The R3B Si-tracker has angle coverage ranging from 6 to 103°. Angles are determined by measuring from the forward direction of the beam axis, with the nominal target position serving as the point of reference. The Si-tracker is an essential tool for studying reactions such as (p, 2p) due to its capacity to trace recoils. The system measures the paths of recoiling protons and combines them to determine the primary vertex. The tracking information is combined with data from various sub-detector systems to accurately reconstruct the reaction kinematics. The angular resolution of a computed trajectory is a crucial factor in determining the accuracy of these measurements. The scheme of the R3B Si-tracker is shown in Figure 6.

The LISA (Lifetime Measurements with Solid Active Targets) [79] project aims to develop an innovative technique for measuring atomic nuclei’s lifetimes. To access the most exotic nuclei, it is necessary to employ thick targets of a thickness of approximately a few g/cm² to maximise the luminosity. To reduce the subsequent deterioration in γ-ray energy resolution, one can replace the passive target with an active one that captures the reaction’s position. The LISA experimental methodology relies on active solid targets that will significantly expand the scope of measurements for excited-state lifetimes and, consequently, the attainable transition probabilities in exotic nuclei. The ion beam separated by the Super-FRS will impinge into a series of diamond detectors, causing direct proton knockout and nucleon removal reactions. The LISA active target will accurately identify the reaction vertex, allowing for the precise determination of the reaction position and velocity β in the Doppler correction process on an event-by-event basis. By using advanced γ-ray tracking detectors like AGATA, this innovative detector will effectively address the current obstacles to measuring lifetimes using low-intensity beams of unstable nuclei.

The Advanced Implantation Detector Array (AIDA) [63,80] is an HISPEC/DESPEC novel detector system used to assess the decay properties of rare nuclei in RIB facilities. The AIDA detector system is shown in Figure 7. The system consists of stacks of up to eight 8 cm × 8 cm, 128 × 128 strips (16,384 pixels) or up to four 24 cm × 8 cm, 384 × 128 strips (49,152 pixels) double-sided silicon strip detectors (DSSSDs). This setup allows for the precise measurement of the positions of implanted ions and their decay products, with accuracy reaching sub mm. The high pixel density per detector enables the correlation of implantation and decay events at frequencies of about kHz. The implant in the DSSSD deposits energy on the scale of several GeV, while subsequent decay events have energy ranging from approximately 50 keV to a few MeV. The average time between implantation and decay varies from tens of milliseconds to several tens of seconds. To address the challenge of numerous channels and measuring energies across a wide range of magnitudes, a specialised ASIC chip was developed [81]. These ASICs offer both low- and high-gain signal processing per strip, with a full-scale range of 20 GeV and 20 MeV, respectively. The dynamic range of these ASICs is 1000:1 and higher.

The first instance in which TOF measurements have been conducted using integrated electronics with a significant distance between the diamond detectors has been reported in [82]. The TOF capability of diamond detectors (intended to be possibly used as the tracking detectors for Super-FRS) with large surface areas, using polycrystalline samples measuring 20 mm × 20 mm and with a thickness of 0.3 mm, was demonstrated. The detectors, which had segmented Cr/Au electrodes arranged in a sandwich format, were exposed to a 1 GeV/nucleon ¹⁹⁷Au beam. When the detectors were placed with a separation distance of 2 cm, they exhibited a TOF resolution σ of 37.5 ps, which was calculated by averaging the results from 16 strip pairs. When TOF measurements were conducted over a particle trajectory spanning 30 m, a resolution of 40 ps was obtained. The detectors were mounted on printed circuit boards.

The conventional method of particle identification involves simultaneous measurements of energy deposition, TOF, and magnetic rigidity. The reliability of such particle identification depends, in particular, on the accuracy of the time measurements. For example, for the unambiguous identification of light ions with a mass number around 10, the time resolution can be about 300 ps, and for heavy isotopes like uranium, the time resolution of TOF detectors is more demanding and should be about 30 ps [83]. Such a stringent value poses a challenge to the detector’s and the corresponding electronics’ properties. Thus, fast radiation hard silicon strip detectors (SSDs) for the TOF beam diagnostics at Super-FRS have been suggested. The results of the tests of radiation-resistant silicon detectors used for measurements in the Super-FRS and EXPERT (The EXotic Particle Emission and Radioactivity by Tracking) projects [84,85] were presented in [83]. The study’s primary focus was to investigate the timing properties of silicon detectors when exposed to radiation from intermediate-intensity Xe and C beams. The time resolution achieved for the detector prototypes exposed to Xe radiation is as low as 20 ps, while for C ions it was 100 ps [83].

A silicon tracker system [86] was specifically designed for conducting experiments using proton-rich RIBs at the SAMURAI [87] superconducting spectrometer of the RIBF (RIKEN RI Beam Factory). The system was specifically developed to achieve the precise reconstruction of angles and identification of atomic numbers for relativistic heavy ions and protons. These nuclei are produced in reactions involving the studies of proton capture reactions relevant to nuclear astrophysics. Highly efficient, exclusive measurements are necessary to compensate for the low intensities and poor quality and purity of secondary RIBs in comparison to primary beam studies. Reaction products are commonly measured in strongly focused forward kinematics due to the high relativistic energy involved. To reconstruct the reaction kinematics, it is critical to track the incoming and outgoing particles in order to extract both the relative energy and the scattering angle. The tracker consists of two sets of single-sided microstrip detectors that measure the coordinates (x, y) at two specific points along the beamline after the target. The system provides particle identification for protons and heavy fragments up to Z = 50, with energy ranging from 100 to 350 MeV/nucleon. The high granularity of silicon detectors is crucial for accurately distinguishing between distinct particle tracks and obtaining precise position information. This is achieved by selecting Si-strip detectors with a little pitch. A 325 µm thick SSD of the GLAST-type [88] manufactured by Hamamatsu Photonics Company (Hamamatsu City, Japan) was selected. The silicon implant strip has a width of 56 µm and a pitch of 228 µm.

For nuclear reaction research using rare isotope beams at low energies, an active target detector array called ANASEN (The Array for Nuclear Astrophysics and Structure with Exotic Nuclei) has been developed [89]. Its objectives are direct measurements of (α, p) interactions with exotic nuclei in inverse kinematics and measurements of the excitation functions for proton and alpha particle elastic and inelastic scattering. Three distinct types of charged particle detectors comprise ANASEN. For low-intensity radioactive beam tests, the active area’s length is 340 mm, and the overall covered area is almost 3π. Because of its cylindrical shape, ANASEN is a good choice for inverse kinematics reaction investigations with high efficiency. The target gas is used as an active gas for a cylindrical gas proportional counter area enabling the determination of the position of the reaction products. The light recoils are detected by a position-sensitive silicon strip detector array backed with CsI detectors. The specific configuration of the gas detector electrodes and the silicon detector array enables the precise determination of the trajectory of each reaction product for each event. This allows for the determination of the reaction, centre-of-mass energy, and final state to be deduced. The readout consists of 480 high-density ASIC electronic channels specifically for the silicon detector and 78 conventional electronic channels for proportional counter and CsI detectors.

The beams to be delivered at SPIRAL2, primarily consisting of fission fragments, will have a greater mass compared to the current GANIL beams. This means that the level densities will increase. Additionally, the incident energy of the beams will be similar or lower. The GASPARD collaboration [90] was established to construct a novel apparatus that is specifically tailored for the optimal investigation of direct interactions using these beams. Direct reactions play a crucial role in our comprehension of nuclear structure and nuclear astrophysics. Their reaction mechanism has a few degrees of freedom, enabling accurate theoretical calculations that provide essential nuclear structure information. These measurements can also provide valuable information on cross-sections that are significant in astrophysics. Light ion beams have been employed for many years to investigate heavier target nuclei in direct kinematics. The introduction of radioactive beams facilitated the expansion of direct reaction investigations to encompass a wide range of unstable nuclei. In this scenario, the reactions are conducted using inverse kinematics, where the radioactive beam is incident on the light probe. The GASPARD project centres [90] around the idea of a highly granular 4π particle silicon detector that can be seamlessly incorporated into available germanium arrays (AGATA, for example). By detecting gamma rays in coincidence with particles, it becomes possible to utilise thicker targets and achieve a significant improvement in excitation energy resolution compared to detecting particles only. Gamma ray detection is essential for obtaining spectroscopic data on populated states. GASPARD also incorporates advanced particle identification algorithms that will be able to include special targets, such as a pure and windowless hydrogen target. The current detector configuration consists of a conical-shaped arrangement of eight trapezoidal telescopes in both the forward and backward hemispheres relative to the beam direction. The forward hemisphere has three layers of telescopes, while the backward hemisphere has two layers. Additionally, there is a ring of squared-shaped two-layer silicon telescopes around 90°, providing a solid-angle coverage of 4π. The outside diameter is suitable for the AGATA. The first layer, composed of small-pitch DSSSDs, is designed to carry out PSD (position-sensitive detection), whereas the remaining layers are specifically used for measuring residual energy. The anticipated quantity of electronic channels is approximately 15,000.

The Optimised Energy Degrading Optics (OEDO) [91] beamline is an upgrade of the high-resolution beamline located at the RI Beam Factory in RIKEN. The goal of this beamline is to measure nuclear reactions induced by low-energy RIB (10–50 MeV/u) while maintaining a minimal energy dispersion. The construction of the TiNA [92] silicon detector array was initiated to investigate low-energy reactions at OEDO. TiNA is composed of position-sensitive silicon detectors and CsI crystals.

The GRIT project (Granularity, Resolution, Identification, Transparency) [93] is about building a state-of-the-art portable silicon detector array for efficiently investigating direct reactions. The system comprises a novel compact silicon array with high granularity and a ∼4π acceptance. The detector will be easily incorporated into other arrays like AGATA and PARIS [94]. The array comprises a series of stacked DSSSDs, with each stack consisting of two or three layers (three layers in the forward direction, two in the backward direction). This configuration yields over 7000 electronic channels of information. An integrated preamplifier, iPACI [95], has been developed for the GRIT array using the AMS 0.35 μm BiCMOS technology. This preamplifier is capable of providing charge and current information and is designed to handle a huge number of channels, exceeding 7000. The detector will be able to distinguish between the various masses of the incoming particles.

The MUGAST array [96] consists of the MUST2 detectors [97] positioned in the forward hemisphere, as well as additional detectors in the backward hemisphere. The MUST2 array [97] used both dE-E and TOF approaches to identify particles. The MUGAST array consists of five 500 µm trapezoidal DSSSDs with 128 × 128 strips positioned at backward angles, in conjunction with four MUST2 telescopes positioned at forward angles. The MUST2 telescopes consist of two stages: a square 300 µm DSSSD with 128 × 128 strips and a 4 × 4 CsI crystals stage. MUGAST is suitable for high-resolution measurements across an extensive range of energies, from 500 keV to 400 MeV. The integration of the MUGAST silicon array with the AGATA and VAMOS spectrometer presented a distinctive possibility to conduct unique experiments, enabling the precise determination of energy and momenta of all reaction products using radioactive beams [96]. The current MUGAST experimental setup is located at the end of the LISE spectrometer [98]. The MUGAST array is combined with the CATS tracker, EXOGAM clovers, and a new zero-degree detection system (ZDD) [98]. The scheme of the MUGAST detectors inside the chamber is shown in Figure 8.

The FAZIA (Four pi A and Z Identification Array) array [99] is a recently developed detector specifically built for detecting charged particles in the Fermi energy range. It consists of three stages of telescopes: a 300 μm thick silicon detector, a 500 μm thick silicon detector, and a 10 cm thick CsI(Tl) detector. It encompasses 192 silicon–scintillator telescopes designed to detect and identify charged fragments generated in heavy-ion fixed target reactions at beam energies ranging from 15 to 100 MeV/u. The pulse shape analysis (PSA) approach enables the identification of ions based on their charge and mass, even in cases where the usual ∆E-E method cannot be used. As a result, it significantly reduces energy thresholds. The telescopes provide accurate energy measurements for particles ranging from a few MeV protons to a few GeV heavy ions. The FAZIA detector unit is shown in Figure 9.

The CHIMERA (Charged Heavy-Ion Mass and Energy Resolving Array) is a 4π detector array consisting of 1192 Si-CsI(Tl) telescopes (300 μm thick Si as ΔE detector and a 3–12 cm thick CsI(Tl) crystal as residual energy (E) detector), designed to detect both charged particles and γ-rays [100]. CHIMERA has a 4π coverage (of the Si–CsI(Tl) telescopes) and is able to efficiently detect both charged particles and γ-rays over a broad solid angle. CHIMERA has been coupled with FARCOS (Femtoscope ARray for COrrelation and Spectroscopy) [101], a correlator that possesses excellent energy and angular resolution, in a Chirone experiment that studies the effects of isospin on the reaction mechanism and the density dependence of the symmetry term of the nuclear matter equation of state (EOS).

The Silicon Tracker for Radioactive Nuclei Studies (STRASSE) [102] at SAMURAI Experiments [86], RIBF, RIKEN, is a recently developed detection system that is currently being built. A schematic representation of STRASSE is shown in Figure 10. It is designed specifically for measuring quasi-free scattering (QFS) at energies of 200–250 MeV/nucleon. The system comprises a charged-particle silicon tracker connected to a specialised thick liquid hydrogen target, which can be up to 150 mm long. The system is designed to fit into large scintillator or germanium arrays. The ultimate goal of the tracker is to achieve a reaction vertex resolution of less than 1 mm and a missing-mass resolution below 2 MeV in σ for (p, 2p) reactions when used in conjunction with the CsI(Na) CATANA (CAesium iodide array for γ-ray Transitions in Atomic Nuclei at high isospin Asymmetry) array [103].

At the REX-ISOLDE (The Radioactive beam Experiment—ISOLDE) facility [104], numerous successful transfer experiments have been conducted using the TREX [105] setup in combination with the γ-detector array MINIBALL [106]. T-REX is composed of compactly arranged position-sensitive ΔE-E telescopes, which cover up to 66% of the solid angle. The setup allows for the identification of light reaction products and the measurement of their angular distribution across a wide range of polar angles. The energy upgrade of the ISOLDE facility, High Intensity and Energy ISOLDE (HIE-ISOLDE) [107], resulted in changes not just to the beam’s energy definition but also to its time structure and emittance, improving both. This led to a notably distinct set of criteria for the detectors, which must have the capability to handle heavy, neutron-rich beams with energies up to 10 MeV/u. An in-depth examination of these criteria, relying on the knowledge gained from the successful TREX array, resulted in the development of an enhanced successor, the Highly Integrated setup for Transfer Experiments at REX (HI-TREX) [108]. The readout will be performed through the FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array)-based GEAR platform for reading the data from the SKIROC2 ASICs. The trapezoidal shape of the sensors was chosen as a compromise between optimizing the detector array for specific physics scenarios and compatibility with the current infrastructure. Due to the lack of commercially accessible silicon sensors, a project was initiated to build a new detector. This project centres around the use of thin DSSSDs that have exceptionally thin entrance windows.

Conversion Electron Detectors

Conversion electron spectroscopy and E0 transition measurements are important techniques for studying nuclear structure. The measurement of electron and gamma ray in coincidence can be used to unambiguously identify transitions and their conversion coefficients [109].

ICEBall [110] is a mini-orange spectrometer composed of six Si(Li) detectors equipped with six mini-orange magnet filters. In mini-orange magnetic filters, electromagnets are arranged in a manner like the segments of an orange. The magnet filters in this arrangement, known as the “orange spectrometer”, generate a toroidal magnetic field to precisely guide the electrons. These designs enabled the placement of the source and detector outside of the magnetic field, resulting in enhanced detection efficiency and resolution compared to the solenoidal systems. The Si(Li) detectors have a total surface area of 750 mm² and are 5 mm thick. The front surface is covered with a thin layer of aluminised Mylar foil. The magnet filter is placed above the detector using a series of aluminium magnet holders. The existing array of six mini-orange Si(Li) detectors will be substituted with six new thicker Si(Li) detectors. The new magnet filters and detectors will convert the ICEBall into the FIREBall [111] array.

SPectrometer for Electron Detection (SPEDE, Cern, Geneve, Switzerland) [112] will be used alongside the Miniball spectrometer at the HIE-ISOLDE, CERN. SPEDE enables the direct detection of internal conversion electrons emitted during flight, without the need for magnetic fields to transport or filter the electrons based on their momentum. Together with the Miniball spectrometer, it allows for the simultaneous detection of γ rays and conversion electrons in Coulomb excitation studies with RIB.

The Silicon And GErmanium (SAGE, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK) spectrometer [113] is used to measure the energies of conversion electrons and γ-rays that are emitted from excited states in nuclei produced in fusion–evaporation reactions. It is used together with the RITU gas-filled recoil separator [114], the great focal-plane spectrometer [115], and the K130 cyclotron [116] at the Accelerator Laboratory of the University of Jyväskylä. Gamma rays are detected using Ge-detectors positioned around the target chamber, while electrons are transported towards the target using solenoid magnets before finally being identified using a segmented Si-detector.

The SPectrometer for Internal Conversion Electrons (SPICE, TRIUMF-ISAC, TRIUMF, Vancouver, Canada) [117] has been used in combination with the TIGRESS (TRIUMF-ISAC Gamma Ray Escape Suppressed Spectrometer, Vancouver, Canada [118]) γ-ray spectrometer at TRIUMF’s ISAC-II [119] facility. The SPICE uses a permanent rare-earth magnetic lens to efficiently gather and guide internal conversion electrons onto a thick and highly segmented lithium-drifted silicon detector. SPICE combined with the TIGRESS enables the high-resolution in-beam spectroscopy of gamma rays and internal conversion electrons using both stable and radioactive ion beams. Commissioning tests have shown that the design of SPICE effectively reduces the flux of delta electrons, which usually interferes with electron measurements conducted in beam.

The SPES Low-energy Internal Conversion Electron Spectrometer (SLICES, LNL, Legnaro, Padua, Italy) [120] was built specifically for conducting internal conversion spectroscopy at the beta decay station located at the INFN Legnaro National Laboratory (LNL) in Italy. This spectrometer integrates the superior energy and time resolution of the Si(Li) detector with the selectivity and high efficiency of the magnetic lenses. SLICES comprises a large Si(Li) detector that is cooled to a temperature of −150 °C, together with a magnetic transport mechanism. Four fixed N52 magnets, positioned around a central photon shield, focus the electrons onto the detector.

To carry out internal conversion studies at iThemba LABS (Laboratory for Accelerator Based Sciences), an electron spectrometer (donated by Institut de Physique Nucléaire d’Orsay (IPNO), Orsay, France) that uses a solenoidal magnetic field acting as a lens and a Si(Li) detector has been refurbished [121] and characterised using calibration sources of internal conversion electrons. The spectrometer, equipped with an array of LaBr₃(Ce) detectors and Low-Energy Photon Spectrometers (LEPS) [122], was successfully used for in-beam studies.

3. Conclusions

The next generation of RIB and stable facilities will need exceptional tracking detectors that can handle the high incident rate, have excellent spatial and temporal resolution, and have excellent identification capability. Research and development will play a crucial role in effectively preparing for future nuclear physics experiments. Further improvement of the efficiency, resolution, and radiation hardness of the current gas-based and semiconductor-based detectors will certainly be needed. Recent years have seen significant developments in scintillator detectors due to the emergence of novel scintillation materials and photo sensors. The future will probably bring more of both. State-of-the-art improvements in the overall readout chain, starting from front-end electronics to data acquisition systems, are necessary, as is the exploitation of machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques. Strengthening of the collaborative efforts in developing novel detector technologies is essential.

Nuclear physicists have significantly contributed to the advancement of particle detectors and their practical applications, particularly in the fields of medicine and national security. Accelerator science and technology, along with detectors, play a crucial role in enhancing the capabilities of nuclear physics. They empower the nuclear physics community to conduct cutting-edge research and develop applications that have wide-ranging societal advantages.

Funding

This research was funded by the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency Grants no: P1-0102, I0-E005.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

Ottini-Hustache, S.; Mazur, C.; Auger, F.; Musumarra, A.; Alamanos, N.; Cahan, B.; Gillibert, A.; Lagoyannis, A.; Maillard, O.; Pollacco, E.; et al. CATS, a low pressure multiwire proportionnal chamber for secondary beam tracking at GANIL. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 1999, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sauli, F. GEM: A new concept for electron amplification in gas detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 1997, 386, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Giomataris, Y.; Rebourgeard, P.; Robert, J.P.; Charpak, G. MICROMEGAS: A high-granularity position-sensitive gaseous detector for high particle-flux environments. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 1996, 376, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Giomataris, Y. Development and prospects of the new gaseous detector “Micromegas”. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 1998, 419, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Derre, J.; Giomataris, Y. Recent experimental results with MICROMEGAS. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2002, 477, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Luoma, M.; García, F.; Äystö, J.; Blatz, T.; Chokheli, D.; Flemming, H.; Götzen, K.; Grahn, T.; Jokinen, A.; Karagiannis, C.; et al. In-beam test results of the Super-FRS GEM-TPC detector prototype with relativistic uranium ion beam. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2023, 1052, 168262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Geissel, H.; Weick, H.; Winkler, M.; Münzenberg, G.; Chichkine, V.; Yavor, M.; Aumann, T.; Behr, K.H.; Böhmer, M.; Brünle, A.; et al. The Super-FRS project at GSI. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2003, 204, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Janik, R.; Pikna, M.; Sitar, B.; Strmen, P.; Szarka, I. Time projection chambers for tracking and identification of radioactive beams. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 1998, 419, 503. [Google Scholar]
García, F.; Grahn, T.; Hoffman, J.; Jokinen, A.; Kaya, C.; Kunkel, J.; Rinta-Antila, S.; Risch, H.; Rusanov, I.; Schmidt, C.J.; et al. A GEM-TPC in twin configuration for the Super-FRS tracking of heavy ions at FAIR. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2018, 884, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Geissel, H.; Armbruster, P.; Behr, K.; Brünle, A.; Burkard, K.; Chen, M.; Folger, H.; Franczak, B.; Keller, H.; Klepper, O.; et al. A GEM-TPC in twin configuration for the Super-FRS tracking of heavy ions at FAIR. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 1992, 70, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Paschalis, S.; Alkhasov, G.; Aumann, T.; Caesar, C.; Gavrilov, G.; Gernhauser, R.; Heil, M.; Holl, M.; Johansen, J.G.; Heil, A.K.; et al. The in-beam tracking detectors of the R3B experiment. Gsi Sci. Rep. 2015, 206. [Google Scholar]
Alkhazov, G.D.; Andreev, V.A.; Golovtsov, V.L.; Ilyin, D.S.; Inglessi, A.G.; Ivanov, V.Y.; Filimonova, N.N.; Kochenda, L.M.; Kravtsov, P.A.; Krivshich, A.G.; et al. Proton Arm Spectrometer for the R3B Set-Up at Fair. Available online: https://hepd.pnpi.spb.ru/hepd/articles/methods_2018-2022/7.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Zeballos, E.C.; Crotty, I.; Hatzifotiadou, D.; Valverde, J.L.; Neupane, S.; Williams, M.C.S.; Zichichi, A. A new type of resistive plate chamber: The multigap RPC. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 1996, 374, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xarepe, M.; Aumann, T.; Blanco, A.; Corsi, A.; Galaviz, D.; Line, H.T.J.S.; Loher, B.; Lopes, L.; Michel, J.; Panin, V.; et al. Resistive plate chambers for precise measurement of high-momentum protons in short range correlations at R3B. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2023, 1055, 168445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jhingan, A.; Sugathan, P.; Golda, K.S.; Singh, R.P.; Varughese, T.; Singh, H.; Behera, B.R.; Mandal, S.K. Compact multiwire proportional counters for the detection of fission fragments. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2009, 80, 123502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jhingan, A.; Sugathan, P.; Kaur, G.; Kapoor, K.; Saneesh, N.; Banerjee, T.; Singh, H.; Kumar, A.; Behera, B.R.; Nayak, B.K. Front-end electronics for CsI based charged particle array for the study of reaction dynamics. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2015, 786, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Available online: https://www.iuac.res.in/ (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Conceptual Design Report (CDR) and Baseline Technical Report (BTR) for FAIR. Available online: https://repository.gsi.de/search?ln=en&cc=VDB&sc=1&p=Baseline+Technical+Report&f=&action_search=Search (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Available online: https://www.ganil-spiral2.eu/scientists/ganil-spiral-2-facilities/accelerators/ (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Williams, C.W.; Kiker, W.E.; Schmitt, H.W. Correlated Energy and Time-of-Flight Measurements of Fission Fragments with Semiconductor Detectors: System Design and Performance. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1964, 35, 1116–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pferdekampfer, K.E.; Clerc, H.-G. Energy spectra of secondary electrons ejected by ions from foils. Z. Phys. A 1977, 280, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Drouart, A.; Mazur, C.; Bourgeois, P.; Bougamont, E.; Gillbert, A.; Lapoux, V.; Nalpas, L.; Pollacco, E.C.; Riallot, M. Very large emissive foil detectors for the tracking of low-energy heavy ions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2007, 579, 1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Odland, O.H.; Mittig, W.; Lépine-Szily, A.; Fremont, G.; Chartier, M.; MacCormick, M.; Casandjian, J.M. A fast position sensitive microchannel plate detector for ray-tracing of charged particles. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 1996, 378, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pullanhiotan, S.; Rejmund, M.; Navin, A.; Mittig, W.; Bhattacharyya, S. Performance of VAMOS for reactions near the Coulomb barrier. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2008, 593, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pancin, J.; Fernández, B.; Damoy, S.; Kebbiri, M.; Papaevangelou, T.; Riallot, M. Micromegas at low pressure for beam tracking. J. Instrum. 2012, 7, C03017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Breskin, A.; Chechik, R.; Zwang, N. Heavy ion timing with very low pressure MWPC’s. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 1979, 165, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Voštinar, M.; Fernández, B.; Pancin, J.; Alvarez, M.A.G.; Chaminade, T.; Damoy, S.; Doré, D.; Drouart, A.; Druillole, F.; Frémont, G.; et al. Beam tracking with micromegas & wire chambers in secondary electron detection configuration. J. Instrum. 2013, 8, C12023. [Google Scholar]
Bittner, D.; Hackenberg, G.; Weinert, M.; Armstrong, M.; Jolie, J. Development of Microchannel Plate Detectors for ion Identification for Slowed down Beams at FAIR with Minimal Interaction with the Beam. Available online: https://www.dpg-verhandlungen.de/year/2024/conference/giessen/part/hk/session/40/contribution/3 (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Demonchy, C.E.; Caamaño, M.; Wang, H.; Mittig, W.; Roussel-Chomaz, P.; Savajols, H.; Chartier, M.; Cortina-Gil, D.; Fomichev, A.; Frémont, G.; et al. MAYA: An active-target detector for binary reactions with exotic beams. Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. A 2007, 583, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Miernik, K.; Dominik, W.; Janas, Z.; Pfützner, M.; Grigorenko, L.; Bingham, C.; Czyrkowski, H.; Ćwiok, M.; Darby, I.G.; Da, R.; et al. MAYA: An active-target detector for binary reactions with exotic beams. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2007, 581, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Blank, B.; Hay, L.; Huikari, J.; Leblanc, S.; List, S.; Pedroza, J.L.; Ascher, P.; Audirac, L.; Borcea, C.; Canchel, G.; et al. A time projection chamber for the three-dimensional reconstruction of two-proton radioactivity events. Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. A 2010, 613, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dobrovolsky, A.V.; Khanzadeev, A.V.; Korolev, G.A.; Maev, E.M.; Medvedev, V.I.; Sokolov, G.L.; Terentyev, N.K.; Terrien, Y.; Velichko, G.N.; Vorobyov, A.A.; et al. Small angle pp scattering at energies from 650 to 1000 MeV. Nucl. Phys. B 1983, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Giomataris, I.; Oliveira, R.D.; Andriamonje, S.; Aune, S.; Charpa, G.; Colas, P.; Fanourakis, G.; Ferrer, E.; Giganon, A.; Rebourgeard, P.; et al. Micromegas in a bulk. Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. A 2006, 560, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sauli, F. The gas electron multiplier (GEM): Operating principles and applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. A 2016, 805, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pollacco, E.C.; Grinyer, G.F.; Abu-Nimeh, F.; Ahn, T.; Anvar, S.; Arokiaraj, A.; Ayyad, Y.; Baba, H.; Babo, M.; Baron, P.; et al. GET: A generic electronics system for TPCs and nuclear physics instrumentation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2018, 887, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Giovinazzo, J.; Pibernat, J.; Goigoux, T.; de Oliveira, R.; Grinyer, G.F.; Huss, C.; Mauss, B.; Pancin, J.; Pedroza, J.; Rebii, A.; et al. Metal-core pad-plane development for ACTAR TPC. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2018, 892, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Camaiani, A.; Barlini, S.; Stefanini, A.; Casini, G.; Alvarez-Pol, H.; Arokiaraj, A.; Baldesi, L.; Bolzonella, R.; Cardella, G.; Ciampi, C.; et al. Energy loss profile measurements using the ACTAR TPC demonstrator active target. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2023, 542, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mauss, B.; Morfouace, P.; Roger, T.; Pancin, J.; Grinye, G.F.; Giovinazzo, J.; Alcindor, V.; Álvarez-Pol, H.; Arokiaraj, A.; Babo, M.; et al. Commissioning of the ACtive TARget and Time Projection Chamber (ACTAR TPC). Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. A 2019, 940, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bradt, J.; Bazin, D.; Abu-Nimeh, F.; Ahn, T.; Ayyad, Y.; Novo, S.B.; Carpenter, L.; Cortesi, M.; Kuchera, M.P.; Lynch, W.G.; et al. Commissioning of the Active-Target Time Projection Chamber. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2017, 875, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Suzuki, D.; Ford, M.; Bazin, D.; Mittig, W.; Lynch, W.; Ahn, T.; Aune, S.; Shore, A.; Yurkon, J.; Kolata, J.J.; et al. Prototype AT-TPC: Toward a new generation active target time projection chamber for radioactive beam experiments. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 2012, 691, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Available online: https://nscl.msu.edu/ (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Bradt, J.; Ayyad, Y.; Bazin, D.; Mittig, W.; Ahn, T.; Novo, S.B.; Brown, B.A.; Carpenter, L.; Cortes, M.; Kuchera, M.P.; et al. Study of spectroscopic factors at N = 29 using isobaric analogue resonances in inverse kinematics. Phys. Lett. B 2018, 778, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cortesi, M.; Rost, S.; Mittig, W.; Ayyad-Limonge, Y.; Bazin, D.; Yurkon, J.; Stolz, A. Multi-layer thick gas electron multiplier (M-THGEM): A new MPGD structure for high-gain operation at low-pressure. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2017, 88, 013303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Obertelli, A.; Delbart, A.; Anvar, S.; Audirac, L.; Authelet, G.; Baba, H.; Bruyneel, B.; Calvet, D.; Château, F.; Corsi, A.; et al. MINOS: A vertex tracker coupled to a thick liquid-hydrogen target for in-beam spectroscopy of exotic nuclei. Eur. Phys. J. A 2014, 50, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Louchart, C.; Gheller, J.M.; Chesny, P.; Authelet, G.; Rousse, J.Y.; Obertelli, A.; Boutachkov, P.; Pietri, S.; Ameil, F.; Audirac, L.; et al. The PRESPEC liquid-hydrogen target for in-beam gamma spectroscopy of exotic nuclei at GSI. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Res. A 2014, 736, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ballan, M.; Bottoni, S.; Caamaño, M.; Caciolli, A.; Campostrini, M.; Cicerchia, M.; Crespi, F.C.L.; Cristallo, S.; Dell’Aquila, D.; Depalo, R.; et al. Nuclear physics midterm plan at Legnaro National Laboratories (LNL). EPJA 2023, 138, 709. [Google Scholar]
Bisoffi, G.; Andreev, V.; Andrighetto, A.; Antonini, P.; Bellan, L.; Bellato, M.; Benini, D.; Bermudez, J.; Bortolato, D.; Calderolla, M.; et al. Progress in the realization and commissioning of the exotic beam facility SPES at INFN-LNL. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1067, 052017. [Google Scholar]
Poleshchuk, O.; Raabe, R.; Ceruti, S.; Ceulemans, A.; Witte, H.D.; Marchi, T.; Mentana, A.; Refsgaard, J.; Yang, J. The SpecMAT active target. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2021, 1015, 165765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Habs, D. Radioactive Beam Experiment at ISOLDE: Coulomb Exitation and Neutron Transfer Reactions of Exotic Nuclei, Proposal to the ISOLDE Committee, CERN-ISC94-25 ISC/P68. Available online: https://cds.cern.ch/record/294864/files/SC00000198.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Fox, S.P.; Amaudruz, P.A.; Bruskiewich, P.; Buchmann, L.; Chipps, K.A.; Hager, U.; Laird, A.M.; Martin, L.; Ruprecht, G.; Shotter, A.C.; et al. TACTIC: A new detector for nuclear astrophysics experiments. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2011, 312, 052007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Heil, M.; Kelic-Heil, A.; Bott, L.; Almusidi, T.; Alvarez-Pol, H.; Atar, L.; Atkins, L.; Aumann, T.; Benlliure, J.; Boretzky, K.; et al. A new Time-of-flight detector for the R3B setup. Eur. Phys. J. A 2022, 58, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Boretzky, K.; Gašparić, I.; Heil, M.; Mayer, J.; Heinz, A.; Caesar, C.; Kresan, D.; Simon, H.; Törnqvist, H.; Körper, D.; et al. NeuLAND: The high-resolution neutron time-of-flight spectrometer for R3B at FAIR. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2021, 1014, 165701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Technical Report for the Design, Construction and Commissioning of the HISPEC/DESPEC Beam Line, Infrastructure and Tracking Detectors. Available online: https://edms.cern.ch/ui/file/2381481/1/TDR_HISPEC_DESPEC_Infrastructure_public.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Available online: http://www.fair-nustar.de/en/experiments/hispec-eng.html (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Ameil, F.; Danchev, M.; Boutachkov, P.; Kurcewicz, J.; Pietri, S.; Ralet, D.; Gerl, J.; Pietralla, N. Time of flight with a segmented plastic finger detector at high particle rate. GSI Sci. Rep. 2012, 171. Available online: https://repository.gsi.de/record/53520/files/GSI-Report-2012-1.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Cortes, M.L.; Schaffner, H.; Kojouharov, I.; Voss, B.; Ameil, F.; Koch, K.; Pietri, S.; Gerl, J.; Pietralla, N.; Bednarczyk, P.; et al. Development and test of a segmented Time-of-Flight plastic detector. GSI Sci. Rep. 2014, 117. Available online: https://repository.gsi.de/record/67836/files/NUSTAR-GS-03.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Vesić, J.; Saha, S.; Górska, M.; Boutachkov, P.; Benzoni, G.; Gerl, J.; Weick, H.; Winfield, J.; Pietri, S.; Nociforo, C.; et al. Simulations of rare-isotope beams for the HISPEC/DESPEC experiments at the Super-FRS. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2023, 1047, 167714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sekiya, R.; Drozd, V.; Tanaka, Y.; Itahashi, K.; Fujioka, H.; Matsumoto, S.; Saito, T.; Suzuki, K. Time resolution and high-counting rate performance of plastic scintillation counter with multiple MPPC readout. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2022, 1034, 166745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kataoka, J.; Kishimoto, A.; Fujita, T.; Nishiyama, T.; Kurei, Y.; Tsujikawa, T.; Oshima, T.; Taya, T.; Iwamoto, Y.; Ogata, H.; et al. Recent progress of MPPC-based scintillation detectors in high precision X-ray and gamma-ray imaging. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2015, 784, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Reinhardt, T.P.; Gohl, S.; Reinicke, S.; Bemmerer, D.; Cowan, T.E.; Heidel, K.; Röder, M.; Stach, D.; Wagner, A.; Weinberger, D.; et al. Silicon photomultiplier readout of a monolithic 270×5×5 cm3 plastic scintillator bar for time of flight applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 2016, 816, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cattaneo, P.W.; Gerone, M.D.; Gatti, F.; Nishimura, M.; Ootani, W.; Rossella, M.; Shirabe, S.; Uchiyama, Y. Time resolution of time-of-flight detector based on multiple scintillation counters readout by SiPMs. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2016, 828, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cortés, M.; Reese, M.; Doublet, S.; Saha, S.; Schaffner, H.; Ameil, F.; Bednarczyk, P.; Gerl, J.; Gorska, M.; Pietralla, N.; et al. Silicon photomultipliers as readout for a segmented Time-of-Flight plastic detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2018, 899, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mistry, A.; Albers, H.; Arıcı, T.; Banerjee, A.; Benzoni, G.; Cederwall, B.; Gerl, J.; Górska, M.; Hall, O.; Hubbard, N.; et al. The DESPEC setup for GSI and FAIR. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2022, 1033, 166662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Available online: https://www.onsemi.com/pdf/datasheet/microc-series-d.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Liu, E.; Drozd, V.; Ekawa, H.; Escrig, S.; Gao, Y.; He, Y.; Kasagi, A.; Nakagawa, M.; Ong, H.; Rappold, C.; et al. A compact start time counter using plastic scintillators readout with MPPC arrays for the WASA-FRS HypHI experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2024, 1064, 169384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Saito, T.; Achenbach, P.; Alfaki, H.A.; Amjad, F.; Armstrong, M.; Behr, K.-H.; Benlliure, J.; Brencic, Z.; Dickel, T.; Drozd, V.; et al. The WASA-FRS project at GSI and its perspective. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2023, 542, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bargholtz, C.; Bashkanov, M.; Berłowski, M.; Bondar, A.; Bogoslawsky, D.; Brodowski, W.; Brudvik, J.; Calén, H.; Capellaro, F.; Chilingarov, A.; et al. The WASA detector facility at CELSIUS. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2008, 594, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheurer, J.N.; Aiche, M.; Aleonard, M.M.; Barreau, G.; Bourgine, F.; Boivin, D.; Cabaussel, D.; Chemin, J.F.; Doan, T.P.; Goudour, J.P.; et al. Improvements in the in-beam γ-ray spectroscopy provided by an ancillary detector coupled to a Ge γ-spectrometer: The DIAMANT-EUROGAM II example. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1997, 385, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gál, J.; Hegyesi, G.; Molnár, J.; Nyakó, B.M.; Kalinka, G.; Scheurer, J.N.; Aléonard, M.M.; Chemi, J.F.; Pedroza, J.L.; Juhász, K.; et al. The VXI electronics of the DIAMANT particle detector array. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2004, 516, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Korten, W.; Atac, A.; Beamel, D.; Bednarczyk, P.; Bentley, M.A.; Benzoni, G.; Boston, A.; Bracco, A.; Cederkäll, J.; Cederwall, B.; et al. Physics opportunities with the Advanced Gamma Tracking Array: AGATA. Eur. Phys. J. A 2020, 56, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mierzejewski, J.; Srebrny, J.; Mierzejewski, H.; Andrzejewski, J.; Czarnacki, W.; Droste, C.; Grodner, E.; Jakubowski, A.; Kisieliński, M.; Komorowska, M.; et al. EAGLE—the central European Array for Gamma Levels Evaluation at the Heavy Ion Laboratory of the University of Warsaw. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2011, 659, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Valiente-Dobón, J.J.; Jaworski, G.; Goasduff, A.; Egea, F.J.; Modamio, V.; Hüyük, T.; Triossi, A.; Jastrząb, M.; Söderström, P.A.; Nitto, A.D.; et al. NEDA—NEutron Detector Array. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2019, 927, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kuti, I.; Molnár, J.; Jaworski, G.; Palacz, M.; Goasduff, A.; Abraham, T.; Antczak, M.; Ciemała, M.; Colucc, G.; Fijałkowsk, A.; et al. Diaman—On Board with Needle. Acta Phys. Pol. B Proc. Suppl. 2024, 17, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Available online: https://cyclotron.tamu.edu/sjygroup/dapper/ (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Schrock, P.; Aumann, T.; Scheit, H.; Simon, H. Development of a Thin Large-Area Fiber Detector for Radioactive-Beam Experiment. GSI Rep. 2013. Available online: https://repository.gsi.de/record/52102 (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Czogalik, M.; Nociforo, C.; Alfonsi, M.; Caesar, C.; Tarquino, J.A.G.; Heggen, H.; Heil, M.; Kurz, N.; Minami, S.; Savran, D.; et al. Plastic scintillator fiber detectors for heavy ion trajectory reconstruction for the Super-FRS at FAIR. J. Instrum. 2024, 19, C06008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gerl, J.; (GSI, Darmstadt, Germany); Vencelj, M.; (JSI, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Private communication, 2024.
Borri, M.; Lemmon, R.; Thornhill, J.; Bate, R.; Chartier, M.; Clague, N.; Herzberg, R.D.; Labiche, M.; Lindsay, S.; Nolan, P.; et al. Detector production for the R3B Si-tracker. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2016, 836, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Available online: https://web-docs.gsi.de/~kwimmer/ (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Hall, O.; Davinson, T.; Griffin, C.J.; Woods, P.J.; Appleton, C.; Bruno, C.G.; Estrade, A.; Kahl, D.; Sexton, L.; Burrows, I.; et al. The Advanced Implantation Detector Array (AIDA). Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2023, 1050, 168166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Braga, D.; Coleman-Smith, P.; Davinson, T.; Lazarus, I.H.; Page, R.; Thomas, S. AIDA: A 16-channel amplifier ASIC to read out the Advanced Implantation Detector Array for experiments in nuclear decay spectroscopy. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation, Measurement Methods and their Applications, Ghent, Belgium, 6–9 June 2011; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
Schirru, F.; Nociforo, C.; Kiš, M.; Ciobanu, M.; Frühauf, J.; Kratz, A.; Kurz, N.; Szczepanczyk, B.; Träger, M.; Visinka, R.J. Development of large area diamond detectors for time-of-flight measurements of relativistic heavy ions for the super-FRS. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 215105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kostyleva, D.; Kiselev, O.; Bezbakh, A.; Chudoba, V.; Eremin, V.; Fomichev, A.; Gorshkov, A.; Krupko, S.; Mukha, I.; Muzalevskii, I. Study of the silicon detectors for time-of-flight measurements at the Super-FRS facility and EXPERT experiments at FAIR. Acta Phys. Pol. 2018, 3, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kalantar-Nayestanaki, N.; Scheidenberger, C. Experiments at the Interface of Nuclear, Atomic, and Hadron Physics with FRS at GSI and Super-FRS at FAIR. Nucl. Phys. News 2024, 34, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Äystö, J.; Behr, K.-H.; Benlliure, J.; Bracco, A.; Egelhof, P.; Fomichev, A.; Gales, S.; Geissel, H.; Grahn, T.; Grigorenko, L.V.; et al. Experimental program of the Super-FRS Collaboration at FAIR and developments of related instrumentation. Nucl. Instrum. Method B 2016, 376, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Stefanescu, A.I.; Panin, V.; Trache, L.; Motobayashi, T.; Otsu, H.; Saastamoinen, A.; Uesaka, T.; Stuhl, L.; Tanaka, J.; Tudor, T.; et al. Silicon tracker array for RIB experiments at SAMURAI. Eur. Phys. J. A 2022, 58, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kobayashi, T.; Chiga, N.; Isobe, T.; Kondo, Y.; Kubo, T.; Kusaka, K.; Motobayashi, T.; Nakamura, T.; Ohnishi, J.; Okuno, H.; et al. SAMURAI spectrometer for RI beam experiments. Nucl. Instrum. Method B 2013, 17, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ohsugi, T.; Yoshida, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Yamamura, K.; Sato, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Sadrozinski, H.F.-W. Design and properties of the GLAST flight silicon micro-strip sensors. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2005, 541, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Koshchiy, E.; Blackmon, J.C.; Rogachev, G.V.; Wiedenhöver, I.; Baby, L.; Barber, P.; Bardayan, D.W.; Belarge, J.; Caussyn, D.; Johnson, E.D.; et al. ANASEN: The array for nuclear astrophysics and structure with exotic nuclei. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2017, 870, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Beaumel, D.; GASPARD collaboration. The GASPARD project. Nucl. Instrum. Method B 2013, 317, 661–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Michimasa, S.; Hwang, J.; Yamada, K.; Ota, S.; Dozono, M.; Imai, N.; Yoshida, K.; Yanagisawa, Y.; Kusaka, K.; Ohtake, M.; et al. OEDO, the energy-degrading beamline at RI Beam Factory. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 4, 043D01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mauss, B.; Hwang, J.; Suzuki, D.; Fukushima, H.; Imai, N.; Ong, H.J.; Kitamura, N.; Michimasa, S.; Wimmer, K.; Yamaguchi, H. Available online: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpsgaiyo/74.2/0/74.2_285/_pdf (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Dueñas, J.A.; Cobo, A.; López, L.; Galtarossa, F.; Goasduff, A.; Mengoni, D.; Sánchez-Benítez, A.M. Test Bench for Highly Segmented GRIT Double-Sided Silicon Strip Detectors: A Detector Quality Control Protocol. Sensors 2023, 23, 5384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Camara, F.S.; Maj, A. PARIS White Book; The Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences: Krakow, Poland, 2021; ISBN 978-83-63542-22-1. [Google Scholar]
Dormar, J.-J.; Assié, M.; Grassi, L.; Rauly, E.; Beaumel, D.; Brulin, G.; Chabot, M.; Coacolo, J.-L.; Flavigny, F.; Genolini, B.; et al. Pulse shape discrimination for GRIT: Beam test of a new integrated charge and current preamplifier coupled with high granularity Silicon detectors. Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. A 2021, 1013, 16564. [Google Scholar]
Assié, M.; Clément, E.; Lemasson, A.; Ramos, D.; Raggio, A.; Zanon, I.; Galtarossa, F.; Lenain, C.; Casal, J.; Flavigny, F.; et al. The MUGAST-AGATA-VAMOS campaign: Set-up and performances. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2021, 1014, 165743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pollacco, E.; Beaumel, D.; Roussel-Chomaz, P.; Atkin, E.; Baron, P.; Baronick, J.P.; Becheva, E.; Blumenfeld, Y.; Boujrad, A.; Drouart, A.; et al. MUST2: A new generation array for direct reaction studies. Eur. Phys. J. A 2005, 25, 287–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Girard-Alcindor, V.; Jacob, H.; Assie, M.; Beaumel, D.; Blumenfeld, Y. Overview and performance of the 2023 MUGAST@LISE campaign at GANIL. Il Nuovo C. 2024, 47C, 59. [Google Scholar]
Barlini, S.; Bini, M.; Buccola, A.; Camaiani, A.; Casini, G.; Ciampi, C.; Frosin, C.; Ottanelli, P.; Pasquali, G.; Piantelli, S.; et al. FAZIA: A new performing detector for charged particles. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1561, 012003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pagano, A.; Alderighi, M.; Amorini, F.; Anzalone, A.; Arena, L.; Auditore, L.; Baran, L.; Bartolucci, M.; Berceanu, I.; Blicharska, J.; et al. Fragmentation studies with the CHIMERA detector at LNS in Catania: Recent progress. Nucl. Phys. A 2004, 734, 504–511. [Google Scholar]
Pagano, E.; Acosta, L.; Auditore, L.; Boiano, C.; Cardella, G.; Castoldi, A.; D’Andrea, M.; Dell’aquila, D.; De Filippo, E.; De Luca, S.; et al. Status and perspective of FARCOS: A new correlator array for nuclear reaction studies. EPJ Web Conf. 2016, 117, 10008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, H.N.; Flavigny, F.; Baba, H.; Boehmer, M.; Bonnes, U.; Borshchov, V.; Doornenbal, P.; Ebina, N.; Enciu, M.; Frotscher, A.; et al. STRASSE: A silicon tracker for quasi-free scattering measurements at the RIBF. Eur. Phys. J. A 2023, 59, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Togano, Y.; Nakamura, T.; Kondo, Y.; Shikata, M.; Ozaki, T.; Saito, A.T.; Tomai, T.; Yasuda, M.; Yamada, H.; Chiga, N.; et al. New γ-ray detector CATANA for in-beam γ-ray spectroscopy with fast RI beams. Nucl. Instrum. Method B 2020, 463, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Available online: https://home.cern/science/experiments/isolde (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Bildstein, V.; Gernhäuser, R.; Kröll, T.; Krücken, R.; Wimmer, K.; Duppen, P.V.; Wimmer, K.; Duppen, P.V.; Huyse, M.; Patronis, N.; et al. T-REX A new setup for transfer experiments at REX-ISOLDE. Eur. Phys. J. A 2012, 48, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Warr, N.; Van De Walle, J.; Albers, M.; Ames, F.; Bastin, B.; Bauer, C.; Bildstein, V.; Blazhev, A.; Bönig, S.; Bree, N.; et al. The Miniball spectrometer. Eur. Phys. J. A 2013, 49, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Available online: https://hie-isolde-project.web.cern.ch/hie-isolde-project/ (accessed on 15 July 2024).
Berner, C.; Wernera, L.; Gernhäusera, R.; Kröll, T. HI-TREX—A highly integrated transfer setup at REX-(HIE)ISOLDE. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2021, 987, 164827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheck, M.; Gaffney, L.P.; Butler, P.A.; Bree, N.; Carrol, R.J.; Cox, D.; Grahn, T.; Greenlees, P.; Hauschild, K.; Herzan, A.; et al. Combined in-beam electron and γ -ray spectroscopy of ^184,186Hg. Phys. Rev. C 2011, 83, 037303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metlay, M.; Saladin, J.; Lee, I.; Dietzsch, O. The ICEBall: A multiple element array for in-beam internal conversion electron spectroscopy. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1993, 336, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lee, K.; Dulal, C.; Tan, W.; Gyurjinyan, A.; Sauer, E.; Lesher, S.; Aprahamian, A. Transformation of ICEBall to fIREBall for conversion electron spectroscopy. Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. A 2023, 1052, 168288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Papadakis, P.; Cox, D.M.; O’Neill, G.G.; Borge, M.J.G.; Butler, P.A.; Gaffney, L.P.; Greenlees, P.T.; Herzberg, R.D.; Illana, A.; Joss, D.T.; et al. The SPEDE spectrometer. Eur. Phys. J. A 2018, 54, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pakarinen, J.; Papadakis, P.; Sorri, J.; Herzberg, R.-D.; Greenlees, P.T.; Butler, P.A.; Coleman-Smith, P.J.; Cox, D.M.; Cresswell, J.R.; Jones, P.; et al. The SAGE spectrometer. Eur. Phys. J. A 2014, 50, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Leino, M.; Äystö, J.; Enqvist, T.; Heikkinen, P.; Jokinen, A.; Nurmia, M.; Ostrowski, A.; Trzaska, W.H.; Uusitalo, J.; Eskola, K.; et al. Gas-filled recoil separator for studies of heavy elements. Nucl. Instrum. Method B 1995, 99, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Page, R.D.; Andreyev, A.N.; Appelbe, D.E.; Butler, P.A.; Freeman, S.J.; Greenlees, P.T.; Herzberg, R.-D.; Jenkins, D.G.; Jones, G.D.; Jones, P.; et al. The GREAT spectrometer. Nucl. Instrum. Method B 2003, 204, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Heikkinen, P.; Liukkonen, E. Cyclotrons and Their Applications. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 8–13 October 1995; Cornell, J.C., Ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 1996. [Google Scholar]
Moukaddam, M.; Smallcombe, J.; Evitts, L.J.; Garnsworthy, A.B.; Andreoiu, C.; Ball, G.C.; Berean-Dutcher, J.; Bishop, D.; Bolton, C.; Caballero-Folch, R.; et al. In-beam internal conversion electron spectroscopy with the SPICE detector. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2018, 905, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hackman, G. Facilities and Methods: High-Resolution Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy at TRIUMF-ISAC. Nucl. Phys. New 2005, 15, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Laxdal, R.E. Comissioning and Early Experiments with ISAC-II. In Proceedings of the PAC07, Albequerque, NM, USA, 25–29 June 2007; p. 2593. [Google Scholar]
Marchini, N.; Nannini, A.; Ottanelli, M.; Saltarelli, A.; Rocchini, M.; Benzoni, G.; Gamba, E.R.; Goasduff, A.; Gottardo, A.; Krings, T.; et al. SLICES: Spes Low-energy Internal Conversion Electron Spectrometer. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2021, 1020, 165860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Avaa, A.A.; Jones, P.; Usman, I.T.; Chisapi, M.V.; Kibédi, T.; Zikhali, B.R.; Msebi, L. Electron spectrometer for electric monopole (E0) transition studies in nuclei. Nucl. Instrum. Method A 2020, 964, 163809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Available online: https://tlabs.ac.za/subatomic-physics-3/infrastructure/ (accessed on 15 July 2024).

Figure 1. The layout of the Super-FRS GEM-TPC detector. It shows the two GEM-TPCs inside one vessel. In this configuration, the drift fields of the field cages are in opposite directions. From [6], reproduced under Licence CC BY-4.0.

Figure 2. Schematic sketch of a general multigap RPC detector. The avalanches (depicted as a blue star) induce negative signals on the (top) anode electrodes and positive signals on the (bottom) cathode electrodes.

Figure 3. Schematic depiction of an SE detector coupled with a gaseous one.

Figure 4. The double field cage of the ACTAR TPC demonstrator apparatus. The pad plane consists of 64 × 32 pixels, each 2 × 2 mm² wide. From [37], reproduced under Licence CC BY-4.0.

Figure 5. The mechanical design of the ToFD detector. It has an active surface area measuring 1200 × 1000 mm² and comprises four planes of scintillators. Each plane features 44 vertical scintillator bars, each measuring 27 × 1000 × 5 mm³. From [51], reproduced under Licence CC BY-4.0.

Figure 6. The scheme of the R3B Si-tracker mounted in the vacuum chamber with the target disc in the in-beam position. From [78], reproduced under Licence CC BY-4.0.

Figure 7. The AIDA detector system: The snout on the left contains several layers of the narrow 8 × 8 cm² DSSSDs, while the blue frame hosts the electronics. From [63], reproduced under Licence CC BY-4.0.

Figure 8. Left: scheme of the MUGAST detectors inside the chamber. Middle: trapezoidal DSSSD placed at backward angles. Right: MUST2 detectors placed at forward angles. From [98], reproduced under Licence CC BY-4.0.

Figure 9. FAZIA detector unit: detectors, FEE, and service cards can be easily distinguished. From [99], reproduced under Licence CC BY-3.0.

Figure 10. Schematic representation of STRASSE (silicon tracker: inner barrel (depicted in blue), the outer barrel (depicted in pink)) with its 150 mm thick LH target (depicted in grey) and the CATANA array (layers 2 to 7). From [102], reproduced under Licence CC BY-4.0.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vesić, J. Tracking Detectors in Low-Energy Nuclear Physics: An Overview. Quantum Beam Sci. 2024, 8, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030024

AMA Style

Vesić J. Tracking Detectors in Low-Energy Nuclear Physics: An Overview. Quantum Beam Science. 2024; 8(3):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vesić, Jelena. 2024. "Tracking Detectors in Low-Energy Nuclear Physics: An Overview" Quantum Beam Science 8, no. 3: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030024

APA Style

Vesić, J. (2024). Tracking Detectors in Low-Energy Nuclear Physics: An Overview. Quantum Beam Science, 8(3), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030024

Article Menu