Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Next Article in Journal
Multifaceted Evaluation of Inhibitors of Anti-Apoptotic Proteins in Head and Neck Cancer: Insights from In Vitro, In Vivo, and Clinical Studies (Review)
Previous Article in Journal
A Network Pharmacology Identified Metastasis Target for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Originating from Breast Cancer with a Potential Inhibitor from F. sargassaceae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, and Cytotoxic Effects of Senna rugosa Leaf and Root Extracts on Human Leukemia Cell Lines
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Plant Metabolomics: The Future of Anticancer Drug Discovery

1
Laboratory of Applied Biotechnology (LBA3B), Department of Cell Culture, Azm Center for Research in Biotechnology and Its Applications, EDST, Lebanese University, Tripoli 1300, Lebanon
2
Department of Natural Sciences, Lebanese American University, Byblos P.O. Box 36, Lebanon
3
College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila 54200, Kuwait
4
School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut 146404, Lebanon
5
INSERM, CNRS, MITOVASC, Equipe CarME, SFR ICAT, Faculty of Medicine, University Angers, 49000 Angers, France
6
CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Aix-Marseille Université, 13385 Marseille, France
7
Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences 3, Campus Michel Slayman Ras Maska, Lebanese University, Tripoli 1352, Lebanon
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(10), 1307; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101307
Submission received: 10 July 2024 / Revised: 19 September 2024 / Accepted: 25 September 2024 / Published: 30 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring Natural Products with Antioxidant and Anticancer Properties)

Abstract

:
Drug development from medicinal plants constitutes an important strategy for finding natural anticancer therapies. While several plant secondary metabolites with potential antitumor activities have been identified, well-defined mechanisms of action remained uncovered. In fact, studies of medicinal plants have often focused on the genome, transcriptome, and proteome, dismissing the relevance of the metabolome for discovering effective plant-based drugs. Metabolomics has gained huge interest in cancer research as it facilitates the identification of potential anticancer metabolites and uncovers the metabolomic alterations that occur in cancer cells in response to treatment. This holds great promise for investigating the mode of action of target metabolites. Although metabolomics has made significant contributions to drug discovery, research in this area is still ongoing. In this review, we emphasize the significance of plant metabolomics in anticancer research, which continues to be a potential technique for the development of anticancer drugs in spite of all the challenges encountered. As well, we provide insights into the essential elements required for performing effective metabolomics analyses.

1. Introduction

Natural extracts have always been a rich source of valuable pharmaceutical molecules [1,2]. Medicinal plants, in particular, are a major source of natural extracts that are extensively used in drug discovery [3,4]. In fact, most of the anticancer drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) are mainly produced from templates of plant metabolites or their derivatives [5]. In this context, it was reported that a significant number of recently discovered cancer drugs contain natural constituents [6]. Among the most well-known plant-based anticancer drugs are camptothecin derivatives [7], taxol (paclitaxel) [8], and vinca alkaloids (vinblastine, vincristine) [9]. Plants contain a complex mixture of active substances and phytochemicals that are responsible for their biological activity [10]. Mainly, secondary metabolites having important pharmaceutical effects on multiple signaling pathways and molecular targets [11,12] are the main substances used in plant-derived drugs [13]. In fact, these compounds act at the cellular or the molecular level [14,15] by exhibiting antioxidant, antiinflammatory, antitumor, and anticarcinogenic effects [16]. Tannins, terpenoids, lignans, phenolic acids, quinones, flavonoids, alkaloids, coumarins, catechins, and isocatechins are among the metabolites that have a significant role in cancer treatment [17]. Although many studies focusing on compounds with anticancer properties from various medicinal plants have been reported [18,19], further research is still required to alleviate the challenges facing the medicinal plants pharmaceutical sector. These challenges include the scarcity of secondary metabolites [20], which can seriously hinder metabolite identification from the step of isolation to the drug development stage. The toxicity of medicinal plants also constitutes a major problem, as it can cause adverse effects in patients [21]. However, the comprehensive understanding of the mode of action of anticancer metabolites remains the main challenge. On the other hand, the heterogenicity of tumor cells and population polymorphism [22], in addition to their acquired resistance to anticancer treatments [23], make the situation more challenging. Even though, the anticancer activity of plant metabolites has been confirmed, new strategies are still required to depict the mechanism of action of these compounds. Therefore, it is crucial to elucidate the interactions between bioactive plant compounds and their targets, in order to understand their therapeutic effects [24]. Metabolomics is the inclusive study of all the metabolites found in a biological system, including carbohydrates, amino acids, lipids, organic acids [25], aldehydes [26], steroids [27], vitamins [28], polyphenols [29], hormones, and signaling molecules [30]. Over the past few years, metabolomics has stood out as a powerful tool for identifying novel therapeutic targets, opening up new routes for therapeutic approaches, especially for cancer [31]. Besides being a simple and effective tool [32], metabolomics enables the identification of the variations affecting the various metabolic pathways [33], the investigation of drug efficacy and toxicity [34], and the discovery of unique biomarkers [35]. Metabolomics also permits to identify the modifications affecting the endogenous and exogeneous metabolites of biological systems [36,37,38]. Multiple studies have applied metabolomics to medicinal plant research, some of which are nicely reviewed in [39]. Accordingly, the use of metabolomics has led to major findings, such as the elucidation of the anticancer mechanisms of plant metabolites [40], the identification and the validation of metabolic biomarkers for cancer diagnosis [41], and the investigation of tumor metabolic reprogramming, in addition to other applications in drug oncology [42]. The integration of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics has helped to achieve a comprehensive picture of bioactive chemicals of plant origin [43]. In this review, we focus on the contributions made by metabolomics studies to support plant-based anticancer drug discovery, and we emphasize its role in tackling the challenges associated to this field. In addition, we highlight how advances in metabolomics have enhanced our understanding of cancer heterogenicity among patients, leading to improved diagnosis. We also discuss the difficulties associated with metabolomics studies, and we provide some solutions. indeed, numerous studies exploring plant metabolomics and its relation to cancer research can be found in the literature including the specific book chapter [44] and the review by Yani Magfiroh, which examined 28 medicinal plants, and provided the analytical techniques employed, the biomarkers found, and the major discoveries made [39]. However, in this review we highlight the key points that should be considered and the errors to be avoided in order to perform an effective metabolomics study directed to plant cancer research. Therefore, our review provides a comprehensive understanding of cancer-related metabolomics, encompassing its advantages and limitations, in order to establish a well-designed metabolomics process.

2. Plant Metabolomics as a Key Tool for Anticancer Studies

Cancer therapies can be divided into conventional (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical) and modern therapies (hormone therapy, stem cell therapies, anti-angiogenic, immunotherapy, and dendritic cell-based immunotherapy) [45]. Several therapies have severe side effects [46,47], and patients often exhibit resistance [48], or show poor response to these therapies [49,50]. Consequently, it is essential to develop treatments for cancer that are both safer and more effective, while minimizing side effects. Many studies have been conducted over the years aiming to find new anticancer therapies, including those based on medicinal plants [51]. Plant-based treatments are promising, where, plant bioactive compounds act on different pathways involved in cancer tumorigenesis [52]. But, the process of identifying bioactive compounds from plant extracts is long and challenging [53]. Until recently, the available methods were time consuming and based on bioactivity-guided fractionation [54,55]. Mainly, the conventional methods for the identification of anticancer phytochemicals typically start with crude plant extraction by different solvents, then plant extracts are separated using different fractionation methods and the bioactive compounds are purified by various purification techniques [56]. Notably, the complex composition of plant extracts is a major constraint scientists face when searching for effective and safe plant treatments. Plant extracts and their fractions are then screened using different bioassays for determining their antiproliferative and cytotoxicity effects against cancer cells [54,57]. Mechanism-based screening methods are also used for screening anticancer plant-derived compounds by focusing on the pathways that are activated. [58,59]. Finally, in vivo trials involving animals and humans allow for the validation of the extracts’ efficacy [60,61]. Nevertheless, most of these studies lack a clear investigation of the anticancer mechanism of action exhibited by the bioactive metabolites [62,63]. Therefore, developing new methods that provide a better understanding of the mode of action of plant metabolites is crucial. This helps in the discovery of more targeted drugs, which in its turn lead to the development of more effective treatments with reduced non-desirable side effects. In fact, researchers have high expectations for the use of metabolomics in anticancer drug discovery due to a number of reasons. Metabolomics plays a key role in determining the mechanism of action of plant extracts as it identifies the altered metabolites and their underlying pathways [64]. For instance, cancer triggers the overexpression of several cell components, such as transporters and enzymes, which constitute good targets for anticancer drugs’ identification [65,66]. Thus, the anticancer activity of natural products should be ascertained through the metabolic fingerprinting and footprinting of cancer cells both prior to and following treatment [67]. Another great feature of metabolomics is that it permits to identify all the metabolic alterations that occur in the body following treatment. That is, it allows to measure both the intracellular [68] and the extracellular metabolites (exometabolomic) that are either released by cells into the extracellular medium or are a result of the different biochemical transformations occurring in the organism [69]. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of the metabolome provides a better picture of the altered signaling pathways and the cellular biology of cells, opening up new routes for drug optimization. Numerous studies have employed metabolomics to identify anticancer metabolites from medicinal plants. Herein, we highlight some of the major findings obtained by these studies. For instance, the secondary metabolites from Ammi visnaga L plant roots extract were identified using metabolomics based on high-performance liquid chromatography–heated electrospray ionization–high-resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC–HESI–HRMS), concurrently with assessing their antiproliferative activity. Ammi visnaga L plant roots extract exhibited antiproliferative effects against different types of cancer cells. Four major compounds, including Junipediol A 4-O glucoside (1), Junipediol A 8-O-glucoside (2), acacetin (3), and apiumetin-O-glucoside (4), were characterized. These metabolites showed an affinity for binding to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, suggesting them as EGFR inhibitors, which was proposed as one of the molecular mechanisms of the antiproliferative properties of this plant [70]. A high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy-based metabolomics approach was employed to identify the bioactive compounds of two chamomile varieties, the Jordanian and European chamomiles, and to distinguish between these metabolites based on their anticancer and antioxidant activities. Among the isolated metabolites, two compounds from the European samples, chrysosplenetin (4) and apigenin (5), showed anticancer activity against a breast cancer cell line (ZR-75 cells), with IC50 values of 21.07 µg/mL and 22.55 µg/mL, respectively. Also, the metabolomics analysis revealed that the European chamomile produced more classes of metabolites with respect to the other plant variety, which was grown under distinct environmental conditions [71]. A gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) untargeted metabolomics analysis was used to investigate the stigma ethanol extract of Crocus cancellatus. The evaluation of the anticancer properties of this extract showed antiproliferative activity against human breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7). This activity was suggested to be related to the action of the cytotoxic metabolites, including crocin (6), crocetin (7), picrocrocin (8), and safranal (9). This work also presented a potent approach based on the selection of specific LC-MS regions, called regions of interest (ROI), in addition to a multivariate curve resolution (MCRALS), which was used for the analysis of the LC-MS data. Moreover, it allowed to differentiate between the metabolites found in the extracts of two plants of the same species, Crocus sativus and. Crocus cancellatus, and helped in the evaluation of concentrations differences between the plant samples [72]. In addition, a widely targeted metabolomics analysis based on liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis allowed to determine the metabolite variability in different colors of carnation flowers. The key metabolites with different antioxidant and anticancer activities were highly present in the purple flower in comparison to the other colored flowers. Among the major compounds contributing to its antioxidant and anticancer effects, 2′-deoxyguanosine, 6-hydroxykaempferol-3,6-O-diglucoside, 6-hydroxykaempferol-7-O-glucoside, and quercetin-3-O-sophoroside were mentioned. 2′-deoxyguanosine was found to have anticancer activity against human cancer cell lines (A549 and U2OS). Interestingly, synergistic effects were also found between 2′-deoxyguanosine (12) and 6-hydroxykaempferol-3,6-O-diglucoside (13) or quercetin-3-O-sophoroside (14), which increased the anticancer activity of 2′-deoxyguanosine [73]. A rapid NMR-based metabolomics approach integrated with biological assays was used to identify the secondary metabolites in fourteen Fabaceae species of Mediterranean vegetation. Parallel biological assays helped to determine the antiproliferative activity against human colorectal cancer cell lines. Cycloartane glycoside (15) and protodioscin derivative (16) were found to have antiproliferative effects on colon cancer cell lines [74]. An approach based on the combination of the total phenolic and flavonoid contents, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays, and LC-MS/MS-based metabolomics analysis helped to determine the phytochemical profile of Glochidion velutinum. The results revealed four compounds, epigallocatechin gallate (17), isovitexin (18), ellagic acid (19), and rutin (20), possessing anticancer activity against both prostate and breast cancer cell lines [75]. Phytochemical profiling of Citrus aurantifolia plant was performed using a combination of liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF/MS) and gas chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS). The anticancer activities of its ethanolic extract against liver cancer cells was determined using MTT assay that showed two compounds, hesperidin (21) and limonin (22) possessing an average IC50 of 165.615 and 188.073 µg/mL, respectively. A synergistic effect of limonin and hesperidin on apoptosis induction was revealed [76]. A 1H NMR-based metabolomics method allowed for the determination of the primary and secondary metabolites from Mahonia aquifolium stem bark without prior isolation. An orthogonal partial least squares to latent structures (OPLS) multivariate analysis helped correlate the chemical composition of the plant extracts to their cytotoxic activity against a human cervical adenocarcinoma cell line, which determined the protoberberine alkaloids, palmatine (23) and berberine (24); and the bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid, berbamine (25); to be powerful cytotoxic agents [77]. An interesting integrative approach that combined different omics techniques, metabolic profiling, and a biological assay significantly contributed to the study of Oldenlandia corymbose, a medicinal plant used in traditional medicine for cancer treatment. Oldenlandia corymbose was subjected to different stress conditions to investigate the impact of abiotic stress on the production of antitumor metabolites. This approach helped fill the gaps between determining the active metabolites and uncovering their biosynthetic pathway and their anticancer mechanism of action. The results showed that ursolic acid (26) was the major compound responsible for the anticancer activity of the extract against breast cancer cell lines. However, other compounds including leanolic acid, lutein, phytol, and pheophorbide, showed only minor contributions to this activity. It was also revealed that ursolic acid affects cancer cells mitosis [78]. In addition, the phytochemical profiling of the active root extract of Picrorhiza kurroa was performed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Its metabolites were characterized by high-resolution atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (HR-APCI-MS) based on high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) fractionation. A compound known as Dihydromikanolide (27) was purified and was proposed as a promising natural compound having anticancer activity against ovarian cancer [79]. Selected examples of anticancer plant metabolites identified by metabolomics studies are presented in Table 1. Notably, the main contribution of metabolomics to these studies was the phytochemical profiling of the secondary metabolites found in the plant extracts, which was crucial for determining the biological and pharmacological actions of these plants. Furthermore, it helped the researchers in selecting target metabolites among the various metabolites identified. Undeniably, metabolomics profiling is essential besides any omic study, since it targets the end products of metabolism, which more accurately reflect the state of the organism [80].
Markedly, combining metabolomics and other omics studies offers several advantages. For example, an integrative study combining transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic analyses revealed important findings concerning the regulatory pathways of Prunella vulgaris L. during development [81]. In plant research, the integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics has facilitated the discovery of relationships between genotype and phenotype through the identification of genes’ function, which controls the entire biological system in response to external influences [82]. Metabolomics studies have also been combined with in silico analyses to determine anticancer secondary metabolites. For instance, a metabolomics analysis based on liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) allowed for the identification of the target compounds in Curcuma longa L and Cosmos caudatus extracts, curcumin (10) and lutein (11). Then, the in silico molecular docking of caspase-8 protein to these compounds revealed different types of ligand–protein interactions, suggesting these two compounds as anticancer agents [83]. In another study, metabolomic fingerprinting based on the use of reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to a high-resolution mass spectrometer (RPLC-HRMS) was combined with chemometric analyses and in vitro cytotoxic assays of different cancer cell lines to explore the biological potential of Spondias mombin and Spondias tuberosa plants, known in Brazilian folk medicine. RPLC-HRMS analysis and multivariate analysis allowed researchers to distinguish between the metabolomics profiles of both plant species, and helped them identify novel metabolites that were described for the first time in these species. The correlation between specific biomarkers that were supposed to be responsible for different degrees of cytotoxicity was also determined. This correlation was further validated by an in silico analysis compared to a commercial drug [84]. Another interesting point about integrated metabolomics is that any change in the level of metabolites might reflect the up- or down-regulation of the underlying biological processes [85]. These changes can be directly related to the functioning of genes that are metabolites regulators [86]. Also, comparative metabolomics studies permit the discrimination between plant species by comparing different plants’ extracts [87]. Metabolomics also provides an idea about the concentration of metabolites, allowing for both the qualitative and quantitative identification of target plants’ metabolites [88,89,90]. Interestingly, metabolomics not only permits the screening of plant metabolites [91], but also allows for the determination of the impact of medicinal plants on cancer cells following treatment [92]. It also allows the prediction of drug–target relationships through determining which signaling processes are targeted by which molecules [93]. This helps in screening the effectiveness of a therapy on cancer cells and its possible side effects.
Table 1. Examples of plant metabolomics studies and their main findings in relation to cancer research. NS: not specified.
Table 1. Examples of plant metabolomics studies and their main findings in relation to cancer research. NS: not specified.
PlantMethod UsedNumber of Identified MetabolitesMetabolites ClassesCancer Cell Lines UsedMetabolites Related to the Anticancer Activity of the ExtractRef.
Ammi visnaga L. (roots)High-performance liquid chromatography–heated electrospray ionization source–high-resolution mass spectrometry metabolic profiling
(HPLC-HESI-HRMS)
SeveralPhenylpropanoids, flavonoids,
isobenzofuranones, coumarins, chromones
Colon cancer (Caco-2), breast cancer (Mcf-7), hepatocellular
carcinoma
(HepG-2) cell lines
Junipediol A 4-O-glucoside (1),
Junipediol A 8-O-glucoside (2),
Acacetin (3),
Apiumetin-O-glucoside (4).
(These compounds have a possible
contribution to the antiproliferative
activity of the plant extract as EGFR inhibitors)
[70]
Annona muricata L.Metabolomic analysis using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
analysis
NSFlavonoids, steroids, sugars, alkaloids,
tannins, phenols,
indoles
Human lung
carcinoma cell line (A549)
NS[94]
Antidesma bunius L. (leaves)Flavonoids, steroids, sugars, alkaloids, tannins, phenols, indoles, coumarins, anthrones, anthraquinones
Cannabis sativa
(leaves)
Untargeted metabolomic study using liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) 38 (positive ionization mode)
41 (negative ionization mode)
N-containing products, polyphenols,
phenylpropanoids, flavonoids, fatty acids derivates, terpenes
Gastric
adenocarcinoma (AGS), melanoma (A375),
human lung
carcinoma (A549) cell lines
NS[95]
Chamomile
(European)
flower
Metabolomic study using high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) and NMRSeveralPhenylpropanoids,
flavonoids, phenolics
Breast cancer cell line
(ZR-75)
Chrysosplenetin (4), Apigenin. (5)[71]
Chamomile
(Jordanian)
flower
-
Cissus incisa
(leaves)
Metabolomic study using
ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of-flight
tandem mass spectrometry
(UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS)
171, 260, and 114 metabolites identified in different extractsPhenolics,
diterpenoids,
flavonoids, fatty acid
derivatives, sterols, fatty acyl, stilbene, acyl
glycerol
Prostate ATCC® CRL-1435 (PC3), hepatocellular ATCC® HB-8064 (Hep3B), hepatocellular ATCC® HB-8065 (HepG2), breast (ATCC® HTB-22) MCF7, lung (ATCC® CCL-185) A549, cervical ATCC® CCL-2 (HeLa) cell linesα-tocopherolquinone, phytol, grandifloric acid, cucurbitacin E, α-amyrin acetate, ursolic acid, δ-linolenic acid, oxyacanthine, stearic acid, matricin. (The cytotoxicity of the extracts might be explained by the presence of these metabolites.)[96]
Crocus cancellatus subsp.
damascenus
(stigmas)
Untargeted metabolomic study using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid
chromatography–mass
spectrometry (LC-MS)
14 (positive ionization mode)
24 (negative ionization mode)
Monoterpene
glycoside, fatty acids, flavonoids
Human breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) Crocin (6), Crocetin (7), Picrocrocin (8), Safranal (9).
(The antiproliferative activity of the plant extract is suggested to be due to these compounds.)
[72]
Curcuma longa L. Metabolomic study using liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass
spectrometry
(LC-HRMS)
16Mostly fatty acidsActivity
determined
in silico
Curcumin (10).[83]
Cosmos caudatus13Lutein (11).
Dianthus
caryophyllus
(different colors of carnation flower)
Targeted metabolomic study using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry
(LC-MS/MS)
932Organic acids, phenolic acids, nucleotides,
flavonoids, lipids
saccharides, alcohols, nucleotides and
derivatives, amino
acids and derivatives
Osteosarcoma (U2OS),
human lung
carcinoma (A549) cell lines
2’-Deoxyguanosine (12),
6-Hydroxykaempferol-3,6-O-diglucoside (13),
Quercetin-3-O-sophoroside (14).
(The combination of 2’-deoxyguanosine, 6-hydroxykaempferol-3,6-O-diglucoside, or quercetin-3-O-sophoroside increased antitumor activity of 2’-deoxyguanosine.)
[73]
Dillenia
suffruticosa
(different
organs)
Genomics, transcriptomics, and ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
(UPLC-MS/MS) analysis-based metabolomic study
Leaf (151),
flower (134),
root (134),
stem (137)
Phenolics, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, lipids, nucleosides, amino acids, organic compoundsCholangiocarcinoma (CCA), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), gastric cancer, colon
cancer, prostate cancer, breast
cancer, lung
cancer, natural killer T cell Page 8/26 lymphoma (NKTL), diffused large B-cell
lymphoma (DLBCL)
The root extract contains high levels of triterpenoids (including ursolic acid), which is known to have antiproliferative effects. [97]
Eleusine indica
(roots)
Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) analysis-based metabolomic study NSNSNon-small-cell lung carcinoma (H1299), breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7), liver
adenocarcinoma (SK-HEP-1) cell lines
NS[98]
Astragalus
boeticus
(leaves)
1H NMR (proton nuclear magnetic resonance) and 2D (two-dimensional) nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy-based metabolomic study 31Amino acids, organic acids, sugars,
flavonoids, phenols, cinnamic acid
derivatives, caffeic acid
Colon cancer cell lines (Caco-2,
HT-29, HCT-116)
Cycloartane glycoside (6-O-acetyl-3-O-β-D xylopiranosylcycloastragenol) (15). [74]
Trigonella
esculenta
(leaves)
Protodioscin
derivative
(25 R)-furost-5-ene-3β,22α,26-triol
3-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl 26-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (16).
Glochidion
velutinum
(leaves)
Liquid chromatography– tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis- based metabolomic study48Benzoic acid
derivatives, flavans,
flavones, O-methylated flavonoids, flavonoid O- and C-glycosides, pyranocoumarins,
hydrolysable tannins, carbohydrate
conjugates, fatty acids, coumarin glycosides, monoterpenoids, diterpenoids, terpene glycosides
Prostate cancer (PC-3), breast
cancer (MCF-7) cell lines
Epigallocatechin
gallate (17),
isovitexin (18),
ellagic acid (19),
rutin (20).
[75]
Grapefruit
(C. paradisi)
Nontargeted gas chromatography–mass chromatography (GC-MS) analysis-based metabolomic studySeveralOrganic compounds (amino acids and
derivatives,
carbohydrates and
derivatives), organic
acids
Human
melanoma cell line (A375)
NS.[89]
Kigelia africana
(fruit)
Nontargeted HPLC coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectroscopy-based metabolomic study356Alkaloids, flavanoids, tannins, phenolicsJeg-3
choriocarcinoma cell line
NS.[91]
Manilkara zapota (leaves)Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis-based metabolomic studyNSFlavonoids, steroids, sugars,
anthraquinones,
anthrones, coumarins phenols, tannins
Human
adenocarcinoma cell line (A549)
NS.[99]
Lansium
domesticum (leaves)
Flavonoids, steroids, sugars, anthraquinones, indoles, triterpenes, sterols
Lime peel
(Citrus
aurantifolia)
Metabolomic study using liquid chromatography– quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry
(LC-QTOF-MS) and gas chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS)
62 (detected by LC-MS)
22 (detected by GC-MS)
Glycosides, saccharides, amino acids, organic acids, alkaloids,
flavonoids, flavonoids glycosides, furanocoumarins,
terpenoids
Liver cancer cell lines (PLC/PRF/5)Hesperidin (21),
limonin (22),
and other
phytochemical
components
(synergistic effect).
[76]
Mahonia
aquifolium
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy-based
metabolomic study
SeveralSugars,
unsaturated fatty acids, protoberberine-type,
aporphine-type
and
bisbenzylisoquinoline-type
alkaloids.
Human cervical adenocarcinoma cell line (HeLa)Palmatine (23),
berberine (24),
berbamine (25).
[77]
Myracrodruon urundeuva
(bark, branch, and leaf)
Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS) analysis-based metabolomic study50Flavonoids, phenols, tannins, quercetin
derivatives, anacardic acids
Colorectal (HCT-116), glioblastoma (SF-295), leukemia
(HL-60),
leukemia (RAJI) cell lines
Compounds derived from quercetin,
galloy derivatives, and phenolic acids (Might contribute to the high cytotoxic
activity of the
extracts).
Quercetin
derivatives,
corilagin, chlorogenic acid (are known to have antitumor activity),
[100]
Oenothera roseaLiquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis-based metabolomic study307Organic compounds, terpenes, lipids,
flavonoids
Human prostate cancer cell line (DU145)40 metabolites were identified for having anticancer and/or antiproliferative activity.[101]
Oldenlandia
corymbose
(roots, flowers, stems, and leaves)
Genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic study using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) NSNSBreast cancer
(SK-BR3) cell line
Ursolic acid (26).[78]
Picrorhiza kurroa (roots)Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis-based metabolomic study
and high-resolution atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectroscopy (HR-APCI-MS)
characterization
SeveralSesquiterpenoid, alkaloids,
fatty ester, others
Breast cancer (MCF7, MDA-MB-231, SKBR3),
ovarian cancer (SKOV3) cell lines
Dihydromikanolide (27).[79]
Plicosepalus
curviflorus
Metabolomic profiling using liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-TOF-MS/MS)NSPhenolic compounds (flavonoid derivatives), triterpenes, sterolsLung (A549), prostate (PC-3), ovarian (A2780), breast (MDA-MB-231) cancer cell linesNS.[102]
Xanthium
Strumarium (root)
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy-based metabolomicsSeveralNSHuman ovarian cancer cell line (A2780cp)NS.[103]

3. Plant Secondary Metabolites Used for Cancer Therapy

Plants contain a large number of secondary metabolites that can be classified, according to their biosynthetic origin into different categories: (i) terpenes (or isoprenoids, biosynthesized by the mevalonic acid pathway), (ii) phenolics (compounds possessing aromatic rings with attached hydroxyl groups, biosynthesized by the shikimate pathways), (iii) alkaloids (nitrogen-containing compounds other than proteins, biosynthesized from amino acids and well known for their use in medicine) and sulfur-containing compounds [104]. In fact, the antitumoral effects of medicinal plants are linked to different classes of secondary metabolites. Important medicinal plants commonly used in traditional medicine, in particular for cancer treatment, their active metabolites, and their anticancer mechanisms of action are nicely reviewed in [105]. Interestingly, some of these plants have been targeted by metabolomics studies, including Curcoma Longa [106], Garcinia oblongifolia [107], and Perilla frutescens [108]. Also, the major phytochemicals from different plant varieties and their molecular targets in lung cancer can be found in [109,110]. Another review also focused on the secondary metabolites that were isolated from medicinal plants traditionally used in South Africa for cancer treatment [111]. Plant secondary metabolites are the basis for the synthesis of semisynthetic derivatives used in clinical oncology [112]. These metabolites have different mechanisms of action, in which they act either as cytotoxic chemicals or as inhibitors of specific targets, such as transporters or metabolic enzymes [113,114]. Also, they show various activities, including antiproliferative [115], antiinflammatory, cytotoxic [116], and antioxidant [117]. In addition, they induce apoptosis [118] and reactive oxygen species (ROS); suppress the oncogenicity of cancer cells; and inhibit metastasis, migration, and invasion [119]. The structure of some of the metabolites identified in the metabolomics studies mentioned in this review is given in Figure 1.
The compounds including cycloartane glycoside (6-O-acetyl-3-O-β-D xylopiranosylcycloastragenol), protodioscin derivative (25 R)-furost-5-ene-3β,22α,26-triol 3-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl 26-O-β-D-glucopyranoside [74], berberine, berbamine, palmatine [77], Junipediol A 4-O-glucoside, and Junipediol A 8-O-glucoside [70], were drawn using Biovia Draw 2022. The SMILES string of all the other compounds were obtained from PubChem and their chemical structures were generated using Biovia Draw 2022 (accessed March/September 2024). The structures were saved in Mol format and then converted to SDF format.

4. Metabolomics as a Powerful Tool for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy

Cellular abnormalities induced by cancer affect cell metabolism in different ways. These abnormalities encompass several metabolic pathways, such as carbohydrates [120], lipids [121], amino acids [122], and nucleotides pathways [123]. Metabolomics has made a significant contribution to resolving these issues through various approaches. Indeed, metabolomics is considered as a significant tool for the determination of cancer signatures that mark the early stages of the disease, allowing for the identification of new anticancer agents. These biomarkers can be found, for instance, in the plasma of cancer patients that are in the early stages of the disease [124]. So, metabolomics reveals novel diagnostic cancer biomarkers based on the variations in the metabolic profiles between patients and healthy individuals, providing insights into the altered pathways resulting from cancer-induced metabolic reprogramming. This aids in improving the survival rate and helps in the discovery of better remedies and prevention measures [125]. Also, metabolomics is employed for assessing drug toxicity. For instance, NMR-based metabolomics combined with pattern recognition data successfully identified the toxicity of Emodin, an anticancer agent found in herbal treatments, by comparing the metabolic profiles of cells before and after treatment. This demonstrated varying levels of metabolites associated with particular pathways [34]. Moreover, metabolomics is used for discovering new biomarkers that are useful for developing novel therapeutic targets. For instance, in the study by Lina A. Dahabiyeh et al., metabolomics improved the understanding of the metabolic alterations that occurred upon the treatment of cancer cells with dihydroquinazolinone derivatives, and also helped to understand the underlying mechanisms of action of the antiproliferative effects of the tested compounds [126]. It also allows to propose novel therapeutic pathways based on modifications in the concentration of specific metabolites, revealing the altered metabolic pathways that cause cancer [31]. In addition, metabolomics permits to follow-up patients at the clinical level [127]. Another interesting point is that metabolomics permits researchers to overcome the difficulties arising from the fact that the bioactivity of natural compounds does not come from the action of a single compound, but from various compounds that act synergistically [128]. Metabolomics has also improved our understanding of the chemopreventive effects of natural phytochemicals. For example, the analysis of mice serum samples by metabolomics after treatment with American ginseng extract revealed altered metabolites that were associated with inflammatory and oxidative properties of the extract; and that were responsible for its chemopreventive effect [129]. Indeed, when aiming to perform a metabolomics study, it is important to maintain the integrity of the sample before and after extraction in order to protect the metabolites from modifications, such as degradation [130]. Metabolomics uses samples from serum, plasma [131], and urine [132], thus, facilitating the conduction of high-throughput large-scale metabolomics studies [133] and making them non-invasive [134]. On the other hand, highly promising branches of metabolomics have evolved including pharmacometabonomics, which allows to develop an individualized therapy response [135]. Significantly, personalized medicine helps in the development of an effective therapy for each patient, taking into consideration their genetic profile and disease history [136]. In addition, single-cell-based metabolomics has aided in the study of cellular behavior, as well as the identification of complex cellular metabolites and the understanding of cellular and subcellular processes [137]. Therefore, progress in metabolomics is highly expected to contribute to drug development starting from an optimized diagnosis [138], passing through drug discovery [139], and ending by testing the treatment efficacy [140]. Figure 2 provides an overview of the use of metabolomics in plant-based drug discovery.

5. Metabolomics Approaches to Cancer Research: Untargeted, Targeted, and Beyond

Metabolomics studies are divided into different types, including untargeted, targeted [141], semitargeted, pseudotargeted [142], widely targeted [143], and stable isotope resolved metabolomics [144]. Untargeted metabolomics allows for an extensive and comprehensive analysis of a large number of unknown analytes in a sample using high-resolution mass spectrometry. Given that untargeted metabolomics allows for the development of an inclusive overview of all the metabolites present in the biological sample under study, it should be first applied prior to targeted metabolomics [141]. Untargeted metabolomics helps to determine the synergistic effects and the underlying mechanisms of drugs used in combination [145] and permits to identify novel bioactive compounds; whereas targeted metabolomics permits to measure groups of metabolites that are chemically characterized or biochemically annotated. Untargeted metabolomics relies on specific sets of known metabolites that are associated with a particular pathway and it involves the use of internal standards making the analysis semi-quantitative or quantitative [141]. Widely targeted metabolomics allows for the qualitative and semiquantitative identification of many metabolites by combining the precision of targeted metabolomics with the comprehensive analysis of untargeted metabolomics. It uses LC-MS or GC-MS or a combination of both techniques [146,147]. While, pseudotargeted metabolomics depends on the selection of a targeted ion pair, which is measured using a triple quadrupole MS by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). An interesting feature of this technique is that it combines the advantages of both targeted and untargeted metabolomics [148]. In fact, metabolomics studies combined with in vitro cancer bioassays have helped to reduce the time required for plant-based drug discovery by correlating the data obtained from both methods [74]. In other words, the cytotoxic activity of the plant extract is measured against a specific type of cancer cell line using, for instance, MTT cytotoxicity assay, followed by subjecting the active extract fractions to metabolomics profiling in order to determine the bioactive metabolites [94]. Here are some examples highlighting the contribution of plant metabolomics to cancer research. For instance, NMR based-metabolomics study was applied to study the effect of curcumin obtained from Curcuma longa on the metabolome of breast cancer cells. In this study, different doses of curcumin were applied to cancer cell cultures, followed by metabolomic profiling that emphasized the dose–effect relationship of natural bioactive compounds in cancer studies [149]. In another study, an untargeted metabolomic analysis was carried out to investigate the potential of Cissus incisa leaves extract on cancer cells, which led to the identification of different metabolites and metabolomic pathways, with an emphasis on particular metabolites that were previously reported to have cytotoxic activity against hepatocellular cancer cells [96]. Other studies showing the contribution of plant metabolomics to cancer research and their main findings concerning the metabolic alterations identified upon treatment with different plant extracts are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.

6. Plant Metabolomics Facing Challenges of Anticancer Drugs Development

The discovery of new bioactive compounds from plants is associated with several difficulties [152] that make the development of plant-based drugs challenging. Finding the precise mechanisms of action of the bioactive compounds is one of the primary causes of these difficulties [40]. Another concern is plant toxicity, which is due to the inherent toxicity of the metabolites or microbial contamination that threatens human safety [153]. Metabolomics has contributed significantly to our understanding of the mechanisms of action of diseases [154] and of drugs, thanks to the identification of the metabolites and metabolic pathways that are directly or indirectly controlled by the drug, including those mediated by the gut microbiota [155]. Also, metabolomics has enabled the evaluation of the effectiveness of plant preparations and their safety [156], which constitutes an important factor that must be tested at the pre-clinical level prior to their approval for human use. Indeed, exposure to drugs causes changes in the metabolome, such as the accumulation of drug and metabolites; in addition to alterations in the metabolites of the host’s microbiota and endobiotic. So, drug safety evaluation should be performed for both the biological sample and the target organs. Notably, the analysis of metabolic changes enables the identification of relationships between the altered metabolites, the associated pathways, and the cytotoxic mechanism. Hence, providing information about drug off-targets and allowing to understand drug toxicity [157,158]. Moreover, plant medicines are made up of a complex mixture of bioactive compounds that when introduced into the human body react with a complex system rendering the identification of drugs’ molecular targets difficult. This further complicates plant-based drug development. Interestingly, metabolomics helps to find molecular targets of medicinal plants by elucidating the changes affecting the endogenous metabolites’ behavior following drug administration [159]. Also, pharmacometabolomics permits to predict drug response through the identification of the altered metabolites or the dysregulated metabolic pathways [160]. Knowing that different types of cancer show resistance to chemotherapies [161], researchers have developed multitargeted therapies as promising tools to enhance the pharmacological potency of anticancer drugs [162]. In this context, metabolomics has helped reveal the multitarget effects of plants against cancer cell lines’ growth by targeting key metabolic pathways [163]. Metabolomics, in integration with other omics studies, has also allowed the identification of crucial metabolites, paving the way for the prediction of drugs concentration in the treated organ. This facilitates the understanding of drug bioavailability and clearance [164]. Furthermore, metabolomics has emerged as a promising tool for quality control of plant medicines using different analytical techniques; mainly, NMR-based strategies. Indeed, quality control of plant preparations is necessary for ensuring the reproducibility of the therapeutic activity of the active compounds found in different batches [165,166]. It also serves as a tool for the authentication of plant-based products based on specific biomarkers that discriminate between close plant species [167]. In fact, plant authentication is one of the most significant stages of plant-based drug discovery. Therefore, it is crucial to authenticate the plant species from which the compounds were isolated in order to correctly associate the compounds’ therapeutic benefits to the appropriate plant species. This will facilitate further research on the identified compounds in the future [168]. In addition, metabolomics can be efficiently used to discriminate between plant samples prepared under different conditions based on metabolic variations [169].

7. Avoiding Difficulties and Performing Successful Plant Metabolomic Analyses

Metabolomics is a highly promising tool for cancer research [170]. However, in order to obtain reliable results, certain measures need to be taken into account at every stage, from sample preparation to data analysis [171]. It is worth noting that achieving a comprehensive profiling of all metabolites using a single method is not possible. Herein, we provide a list of several key steps to be considered and the errors to be avoided when aiming to conduct a successful metabolomics analysis of anticancer medicinal plants, Table 3.

8. Challenges of Plant Metabolomics-Based Anticancer Drug Development and Possible Solutions

Although metabolomics studies are highly promising, they are associated with a number of difficulties, such as analytical and technical challenges [200,201]. Accordingly, it is critical to search for optimal extraction methods and to standardize protocols in order to ensure the proper data exchange between laboratories and to establish uniform databases [173]. One of the major problems associated with metabolomics is that performing metabolomic analyses solely in vitro may lead to incomplete results, which will not reflect natural cell behavior. This problem can be solved by the combination of both in vivo and in vitro studies, which allows for a more reliable study of cancer metabolism [202]. Another difficulty is the samples’ incompatibility with most of the analytical techniques used for metabolomics analyses. This might lead to certain losses in the poorly fixed metabolites from the liquid chromatography (LC) column in the hyphenated MS system, which could lead to insufficient ionization during mass spectrometry [203,204]. Also, some metabolites are not suitable for metabolomics applications, since they can degrade easily throughout the extraction process [202]. Although NMR is an excellent tool for metabolomics research, there are a number of challenges associated with the identification, quantitation, and reliable detection of metabolites by this technique [205]. Moreover, great attention should be given to the statistical approaches used in metabolomics studies, in particular, the method, the number of samples, and the duplication of studies [206,207]. On the other hand, thousands of metabolites (or mass peaks) have been detected using untargeted metabolomics experiments, but the main problem is identifying these metabolites. Indeed, metabolite annotation is a critical step to achieve the reliable identification of metabolites. But it constitutes a major difficulty, especially for untargeted metabolomics [208,209]. The challenge of acquiring a comprehensive phytochemical profile is demonstrated by a study that sought to determine the anticancer activity of Kigelia africana extracts; only 63.8% of the detected signals were identified after a comparison with the available data libraries. Thus, the lack of inclusive databases leads to the incomplete identification of the detected signals, and complicates the differentiation between isoforms. This limits the identification of all the compounds that are responsible for the anticancer activity of the extract [91]. Nevertheless, some studies have developed new strategies to overcome the limitations of databases. For instance, a structural motif-based approach (SUMMIT Motif), was developed to identify the undiscovered metabolites, in which their spectroscopic signatures have no matches in the available metabolomics databases. This approach requires no extensive purification, and uses NMR in tandem with new NMR molecular structural motif metabolomics databases [210]. Another study used a novel strategy called structure of unknown metabolomic mixture components by MS/NMR (SUMMIT MS/NMR), which allowed for the identification of unknown metabolites without any purification, and with no need for MS and NMR databases [191]. Also, several attempts have been carried out to improve metabolomic annotation [211,212]. For example, the use of tandem mass spectrometry reveals additional structural data leading to better annotation [194]. There exist several open databases that can be used for natural product identification, including MassBank [213] and Metlin databases [214], in addition to PRIMe [215] and PlantMetSuite, which are public website databases [216]. Another commercial database is Wiley Registry/NIST Mass Spectral Library that provides electron ionization (EI) and tandem MS/MS spectra [217]. Also, in-house spectral libraries have been constructed and used for plant studies [216,218], but they are not accessible by other laboratories. Notably, there are around two thousand standards available for expanding plant metabolites spectral libraries [219]. While metabolomics studies help identify phytochemicals and, thus, eliminate the need for long purification steps [220], one should take into account to what extent metabolomics data can be considered reliable and reproducible [172]; as this might affect the accuracy of the link established between the health benefits of different plants and their phytochemicals’ content.

9. Conclusions

Conducting fruitful cancer research and finding novel therapeutics necessitates a close investigation of the changes impacting the biochemical state and the underlying biological processes occurring in cells, tissues, and organisms. This can be only achieved through well-planned metabolomics research, which is predicated on rapid, comprehensive, and reliable identification of metabolites. Metabolomics studies give insights into the metabolic network rearrangements that naturally occur during the transformation of normal cells into malignant cells. So, discovering these metabolic changes through a comprehensive identification of metabolites, will lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of anticancer drugs, and to the identification of novel biomarkers. In this regard, finding good correlations between metabolites obtained from both the medicinal plants and the biological samples taken from patients will help develop new effective therapies. Also, a critical point to consider is the patients’ backgrounds and the external factors, which can greatly affect metabolic profiling. Since metabolomics is still in the developmental stage, it faces several difficulties. The lack of effective strategies for the identification of metabolites, the need for a standardized method, the low detection sensitivity of the analytical techniques, the difficulty in achieving unbiased and high-throughput quantitative analyses, and the absence of comprehensive databases constitute the major problems for drug discovery from medicinal plants. Combining NMR and MS techniques in addition to the integration of metabolomics with other omics studies remains indispensable for metabolomics to uncover the different mechanisms and the underlying pathways. All in all, a profound knowledge of metabolomics in plants and in the human body can help better comprehend the body response to therapy, making it possible to determine the optimal dose, and to develop individualized treatment. Also, discovering biomarkers for cancer diagnosis holds great promises for detecting the early stages of the disease and save patients a lot of pain and suffering. The main purpose of this work was to guide researchers to develop well-designed metabolomics studies for cancer research. In the first place, we emphasized the importance of metabolomics in the search for plant-based therapeutics. Furthermore, we detailed several medicinal plants and the different metabolomics approaches used to identify anticancer metabolites. Then, we outlined the most important parameters that researchers should consider before conducting any metabolomics research, as well as the potential advantages. We also reviewed the most common challenges that researchers might face when aiming to perform metabolomics studies, and we provided some solutions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.F. and J.-M.S.; software, R.D.; validation, M.R. (Mohamad Rima), R.R., C.L., M.R. (Mohamad Rahal), Z.F. and J.-M.S.; investigation, M.R. (Mohamad Rima), C.L. and Z.F.; writing—original draft preparation, R.D.; writing—review and editing, M.R. (Mohamad Rima), R.R., C.L. and Z.F.; visualization, J.-M.S.; supervision, Z.F.; project administration, Z.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lebanese University for their academic support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rima, M.; Alavi Naini, S.M.; Karam, M.; Sadek, R.; Sabatier, J.-M.; Fajloun, Z. Vipers of the middle east: A rich source of bioactive molecules. Molecules 2018, 23, 2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wehbe, R.; Frangieh, J.; Rima, M.; El Obeid, D.; Sabatier, J.-M.; Fajloun, Z. Bee venom: Overview of main compounds and bioactivities for therapeutic interests. Molecules 2019, 24, 2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Salim, A.A.; Chin, Y.-W.; Kinghorn, A.D. Drug discovery from plants. Bioact. Mol. Med. Plants 2008, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Jamal, H.; Idriss, S.; Roufayel, R.; Abi Khattar, Z.; Fajloun, Z.; Sabatier, J.-M. Treating COVID-19 with Medicinal Plants: Is It Even Conceivable? A Comprehensive Review. Viruses 2024, 16, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Seca, A.M.; Pinto, D.C. Plant secondary metabolites as anticancer agents: Successes in clinical trials and therapeutic application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Potmesil, M.; Pinedo, H.M. Camptothecins New Anticancer Agents; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ojima, I. Taxol®: Science and Applications Edited by Matthew Suffness; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995; 426p, ISBN 0-8493-8382-X. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhou, X.-J.; Rahmani, R. Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of vinca alkaloids. Drugs 1992, 44, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arora, C.; Verma, D.K.; Aslam, J.; Mahish, P.K. Phytochemicals in Medicinal Plants: Biodiversity, Bioactivity and Drug Discovery; Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG: Berlin, Germany, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hematpoor, A.; Paydar, M.; Liew, S.Y.; Sivasothy, Y.; Mohebali, N.; Looi, C.Y.; Wong, W.F.; Azirun, M.S.; Awang, K. Phenylpropanoids isolated from Piper sarmentosum Roxb. induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells through reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial-dependent pathways. Chem. -Biol. Interact. 2018, 279, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhao, Z.; Jin, G.; Ge, Y.; Guo, Z. Naringenin inhibits migration of breast cancer cells via inflammatory and apoptosis cell signaling pathways. Inflammopharmacology 2019, 27, 1021–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hussein, R.A.; El-Anssary, A.A. Plants secondary metabolites: The key drivers of the pharmacological actions of medicinal plants. Herb. Med. 2019, 1, 11–30. [Google Scholar]
  14. Naz, F.; Khan, F.I.; Mohammad, T.; Khan, P.; Manzoor, S.; Hasan, G.M.; Lobb, K.A.; Luqman, S.; Islam, A.; Ahmad, F. Investigation of molecular mechanism of recognition between citral and MARK4: A newer therapeutic approach to attenuate cancer cell progression. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 2580–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Homayoonfal, M.; Gilasi, H.; Asemi, Z.; Mahabady, M.K.; Asemi, R.; Yousefi, B. Quercetin modulates signal transductions and targets non-coding RNAs against cancer development. Cell. Signal. 2023, 107, 110667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Srivastav, V.K.; Egbuna, C.; Tiwari, M. Plant secondary metabolites as lead compounds for the production of potent drugs. In Phytochemicals as Lead Compounds for New Drug Discovery; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  17. Datir, S.S. Plant metabolites as new leads to anticancer drug discovery: Approaches and challenges. Anticancer Plants Nat. Prod. Biotechnol. Implements 2018, 2, 141–161. [Google Scholar]
  18. Elansary, H.O.; Szopa, A.; Kubica, P.; A. Al-Mana, F.; Mahmoud, E.A.; Zin El-Abedin, T.K.A.; Mattar, M.A.; Ekiert, H. Phenolic compounds of Catalpa speciosa, Taxus cuspidata, and Magnolia acuminata have antioxidant and anticancer activity. Molecules 2019, 24, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mahnashi, M.H.; Alqahtani, Y.S.; Alyami, B.A.; Alqarni, A.O.; Ullah, F.; Wadood, A.; Sadiq, A.; Shareef, A.; Ayaz, M. Cytotoxicity, anti-angiogenic, anti-tumor and molecular docking studies on phytochemicals isolated from Polygonum hydropiper L. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2021, 21, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Salem, M.A.; Perez de Souza, L.; Serag, A.; Fernie, A.R.; Farag, M.A.; Ezzat, S.M.; Alseekh, S. Metabolomics in the context of plant natural products research: From sample preparation to metabolite analysis. Metabolites 2020, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Subramanian, K.; Sankaramourthy, D.; Gunasekaran, M. Toxicity studies related to medicinal plants. In Natural Products and Drug Discovery; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 491–505. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pe’er, D.; Ogawa, S.; Elhanani, O.; Keren, L.; Oliver, T.G.; Wedge, D. Tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Cell 2021, 39, 1015–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sauveur, J.; Matera, E.-L.; Chettab, K.; Valet, P.; Guitton, J.; Savina, A.; Dumontet, C. Esophageal cancer cells resistant to T-DM1 display alterations in cell adhesion and the prostaglandin pathway. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 21141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Olivés, J.; Mestres, J. Closing the gap between therapeutic use and mode of action in remedial herbs. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pramai, P.; Hamid, N.A.A.; Mediani, A.; Maulidiani, M.; Abas, F.; Jiamyangyuen, S. Metabolite profiling, antioxidant, and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of germinated rice: Nuclear-magnetic-resonance-based metabolomics study. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, X.; Lu, Y.; Guan, X.; Dong, B.; Chavan, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Krishnamurthy, P.; Li, F. Metabolomics reveals the formation of aldehydes and iminium in gefitinib metabolism. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2015, 97, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Storbeck, K.-H.; Schiffer, L.; Baranowski, E.S.; Chortis, V.; Prete, A.; Barnard, L.; Gilligan, L.C.; Taylor, A.E.; Idkowiak, J.; Arlt, W. Steroid metabolome analysis in disorders of adrenal steroid biosynthesis and metabolism. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 1605–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cho, J.-Y.; Kang, D.W.; Ma, X.; Ahn, S.-H.; Krausz, K.W.; Luecke, H.; Idle, J.R.; Gonzalez, F.J. Metabolomics reveals a novel vitamin E metabolite and attenuated vitamin E metabolism upon PXR activation. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 924–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Alldritt, I.; Whitham-Agut, B.; Sipin, M.; Studholme, J.; Trentacoste, A.; Tripp, J.A.; Cappai, M.G.; Ditchfield, P.; Devièse, T.; Hedges, R.E. Metabolomics reveals diet-derived plant polyphenols accumulate in physiological bone. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, J.; Liang, L.; Xie, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Su, L.; Tang, Y.; Sun, B.; Lai, Y.; Li, H. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal molecular responses of two pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars to cold stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 819630. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, W.; Yang, J.; Edin, M.L.; Wang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Wan, D.; Yang, H.; Song, C.-Q.; Xue, W.; Sanidad, K.Z. Targeted metabolomics identifies the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase eicosanoid pathway as a novel therapeutic target of colon tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 1822–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Danzi, F.; Pacchiana, R.; Mafficini, A.; Scupoli, M.T.; Scarpa, A.; Donadelli, M.; Fiore, A. To metabolomics and beyond: A technological portfolio to investigate cancer metabolism. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Brown, D.G.; Rao, S.; Weir, T.L.; O’Malia, J.; Bazan, M.; Brown, R.J.; Ryan, E.P. Metabolomics and metabolic pathway networks from human colorectal cancers, adjacent mucosa, and stool. Cancer Metab. 2016, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, C.; Gao, J.; Wang, T.-S.; Guo, C.; Yan, Y.-J.; Mao, C.-Y.; Gu, L.-W.; Yang, Y.; Li, Z.-F.; Liu, A. NMR-based metabolomic techniques identify the toxicity of emodin in HepG2 cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Martín-Blázquez, A.; Jiménez-Luna, C.; Díaz, C.; Martínez-Galán, J.; Prados, J.; Vicente, F.; Melguizo, C.; Genilloud, O.; Pérez del Palacio, J.; Caba, O. Discovery of pancreatic adenocarcinoma biomarkers by untargeted metabolomics. Cancers 2020, 12, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Trifonova, O.; Lokhov, P.; Archakov, A. Postgenomics diagnostics: Metabolomics approaches to human blood profiling. Omics J. Integr. Biol. 2013, 17, 550–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Prosser, G.A.; Larrouy-Maumus, G.; de Carvalho, L.P.S. Metabolomic strategies for the identification of new enzyme functions and metabolic pathways. EMBO Rep. 2014, 15, 657–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.-X.; Yu, P.-C.; Li, J. High-Throughput metabolomics for identification of metabolic pathways and deciphering the effect mechanism of dioscin on rectal cancer from cell metabolic profiles coupled with chemometrics analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Magfiroh, Y. Identification of Anti-Cancer Compounds in Medicinal Plants Using Metabolomic Approaches: A Review. Bioeksperimen J. Penelit. Biologi 2023, 9, 174–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Oyenihi, O.R.; Oyenihi, A.B.; Erhabor, J.O.; Matsabisa, M.G.; Oguntibeju, O.O. Unravelling the anticancer mechanisms of traditional herbal medicines with metabolomics. Molecules 2021, 26, 6541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Lu, H. Metabolomics identified new biomarkers for the precise diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and associated tissue metastasis. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 156, 104805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Han, J.; Li, Q.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Y. Recent metabolomics analysis in tumor metabolism reprogramming. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 763902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, W.; Zeng, Y.; Jiao, M.; Ye, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, J. Integration of high-throughput omics technologies in medicinal plant research: The new era of natural drug discovery. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1073848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Manickavasagam, G.; Mahendran, T.R.; Lim, V. Metabolomics and Cancer: Identification of Biomarkers from Plant-Based Pharmaceuticals Using an Integrated Approach; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  45. Debela, D.T.; Muzazu, S.G.; Heraro, K.D.; Ndalama, M.T.; Mesele, B.W.; Haile, D.C.; Kitui, S.K.; Manyazewal, T. New approaches and procedures for cancer treatment: Current perspectives. SAGE Open Med. 2021, 9, 20503121211034366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lee, E.Q. Neurologic complications of cancer therapies. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2021, 21, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Altun, I.; Sonkaya, A. The most common side effects experienced by patients were receiving first cycle of chemotherapy. Iran. J. Public Health 2018, 47, 1218–1219. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Ji, X.; Ji, J.; Shan, F.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lu, X. Cancer-associated fibroblasts from NSCLC promote the radioresistance in lung cancer cell lines. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 7002. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Maeda, H.; Khatami, M. Analyses of repeated failures in cancer therapy for solid tumors: Poor tumor-selective drug delivery, low therapeutic efficacy and unsustainable costs. Clin. Transl. Med. 2018, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Marin, J.J.; Briz, O.; Herraez, E.; Lozano, E.; Asensio, M.; Di Giacomo, S.; Romero, M.R.; Osorio-Padilla, L.M.; Santos-Llamas, A.I.; Serrano, M.A. Molecular bases of the poor response of liver cancer to chemotherapy. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2018, 42, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Khan, M.I.; Bouyahya, A.; Hachlafi, N.E.; Menyiy, N.E.; Akram, M.; Sultana, S.; Zengin, G.; Ponomareva, L.; Shariati, M.A.; Ojo, O.A. Anticancer properties of medicinal plants and their bioactive compounds against breast cancer: A review on recent investigations. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 24411–24444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Widodo, N.; Takagi, Y.; Shrestha, B.G.; Ishii, T.; Kaul, S.C.; Wadhwa, R. Selective killing of cancer cells by leaf extract of Ashwagandha: Components, activity and pathway analyses. Cancer Lett. 2008, 262, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Abdelmohsen, U.R.; Sayed, A.M.; Elmaidomy, A.H. Natural Products’ Extraction and Isolation-between Conventional and Modern Techniques. Front. Nat. Prod. 2022, 1, 873808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mani, J.; Johnson, J.; Hosking, H.; Hoyos, B.E.; Walsh, K.B.; Neilsen, P.; Naiker, M. Bioassay guided fractionation protocol for determining novel active compounds in selected Australian flora. Plants 2022, 11, 2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Abdallah, M.S.; Mustafa, M.; Nallappan, M.A.P.; Choi, S.; Paik, J.-H.; Rusea, G. Determination of phenolics and flavonoids of some useful medicinal plants and bioassay-guided fractionation substances of Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich) Hochst stem (bark) extract and their efficacy against Salmonella typhi. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 670530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abubakar, A.R.; Haque, M. Preparation of medicinal plants: Basic extraction and fractionation procedures for experimental purposes. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2020, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Delazar, A.; Asnaashari, S.; Nikkhah, E.; Asgharian, P. Phytochemical analysis and antiproliferative activity of the aerial parts of Scrophularia subaphylla. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 14, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Hsu, S.; Yu, F.-X.X.; Huang, Q.; Lewis, J.; Singh, B.; Dickinson, D.; Borke, J.; Sharawy, M.; Wataha, J.; Yamamoto, T. A mechanism-based in vitro anticancer drug screening approach for phenolic phytochemicals. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2003, 1, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hua, Y.; Shu, Z.; Meijer, L.; Li, S.-M.; Leclerc, S.; Yu, L.-L.; Cheng, J.-Q.; Zhang, S.-Z. Screening the active constituents of Chinese medicinal herbs as potent inhibitors of Cdc25 tyrosine phosphatase, an activator of the mitosis-inducing p34 cdc2 kinase. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2005, 6, 656–663. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ovadje, P.; Ma, D.; Tremblay, P.; Roma, A.; Steckle, M.; Guerrero, J.-A.; Arnason, J.T.; Pandey, S. Evaluation of the efficacy & biochemical mechanism of cell death induction by Piper longum extract selectively in in-vitro and in-vivo models of human cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113250. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yue, G.G.L.; Chan, Y.Y.; Liu, W.; Gao, S.; Wong, C.W.; Lee, J.K.M.; Lau, K.M.; Lau, C.B.S. Effectiveness of Scutellaria barbata water extract on inhibiting colon tumor growth and metastasis in tumor-bearing mice. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Indrawati, L.; Ascobat, P.; Bela, B.; Abdullah, M.; Surono, I.S. The effect of an’Annona muricata’leaf extract on nutritional status and cytotoxicity in colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 26, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Yuan, F.; Bai, G.; Miao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, J. Annosquacin B induces mitochondrial apoptosis in multidrug resistant human breast cancer cell line MCF-7/ADR through selectively modulating MAPKs pathways. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 3040–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liu, Q.; Shen, J.-M.; Hong, H.-J.; Yang, Q.; Liu, W.; Guan, Z.; Wang, Y.-T.; Chen, X.-J. Cell metabolomics study on the anticancer effects of Ophiopogon japonicus against lung cancer cells using UHPLC/Q-TOF-MS analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1017830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lu, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, J.; Yang, C.; Mao, H.; Fu, X.; Wu, Y.; Cai, J.; Han, J.; Xu, Z. Overexpression of arginine transporter CAT-1 is associated with accumulation of L-arginine and cell growth in human colorectal cancer tissue. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Li, Q.K.; Peskoe, S.B.; Zhang, B.; Choi, C.; Platz, E.A.; Zhang, H. Overexpression of α (1, 6) fucosyltransferase associated with aggressive prostate cancer. Glycobiology 2014, 24, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kim, H.K.; Wilson, E.G.; Choi, Y.H.; Verpoorte, R. Metabolomics: A tool for anticancer lead-finding from natural products. Planta Medica 2010, 76, 1094–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dunn, W.B. Current trends and future requirements for the mass spectrometric investigation of microbial, mammalian and plant metabolomes. Phys. Biol. 2008, 5, 011001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Thirumurugan, D.; Cholarajan, A.; Raja, S.; Vijayakumar, R. An introductory chapter: Secondary metabolites. In Secondary Metabolites—Sources and Applications; InTech Open: London, UK, 2018; pp. 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ahmed, S.S.; Fahim, J.R.; Youssif, K.A.; AboulMagd, A.M.; Amin, M.N.; Abdelmohsen, U.R.; Hamed, A.N.E. Metabolomics of the secondary metabolites of Ammi visnaga L. roots (family Apiaceae) and evaluation of their biological potential. South Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 149, 860–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Atoum, D.; Fernandez-Pastor, I.; Young, L.; Edrada-Ebel, R. Use of multivariate analysis to unravel the differences between two chamomile varieties and their anticancer and antioxidant activities. Plants 2023, 12, 2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Shakeri, R.; Savari, B.; Sheikholeslami, M.N.; Radjabian, T.; Khorshidi, J.; Safavi, M. Untargeted metabolomics analysis of Crocus cancellatus subsp. damascenus (Herb.) B. Mathew Stigmas and their anticarcinogenic effect on breast cancer cells. Evid. -Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 3861783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhou, X.; Wang, M.; Li, H.; Ye, S.; Tang, W. Widely targeted metabolomics reveals the antioxidant and anticancer activities of different colors of Dianthus caryophyllus. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1166375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Graziani, V.; Scognamiglio, M.; Belli, V.; Esposito, A.; D’Abrosca, B.; Chambery, A.; Russo, R.; Panella, M.; Russo, A.; Ciardiello, F. Metabolomic approach for a rapid identification of natural products with cytotoxic activity against human colorectal cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Shah, S.L.; Bashir, K.; Rasheed, H.M.; Rahman, J.U.; Ikram, M.; Shah, A.J.; Majrashi, K.A.; Alnasser, S.M.; Menaa, F.; Khan, T. LC-MS/MS-Based Metabolomic Profiling of Constituents from Glochidion velutinum and Its Activity against Cancer Cell Lines. Molecules 2022, 27, 9012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Phucharoenrak, P.; Muangnoi, C.; Trachootham, D. Metabolomic Analysis of Phytochemical Compounds from Ethanolic Extract of Lime (Citrus aurantifolia) Peel and Its Anti-Cancer Effects against Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Molecules 2023, 28, 2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gođevac, D.; Damjanović, A.; Stanojković, T.P.; Anđelković, B.; Zdunić, G. Identification of cytotoxic metabolites from Mahonia aquifolium using 1H NMR-based metabolomics approach. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 150, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Julca, I.; Mutwil-Anderwald, D.; Manoj, V.; Khan, Z.; Lai, S.K.; Yang, L.K.; Beh, I.T.; Dziekan, J.; Lim, Y.P.; Lim, S.K. Genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analysis of Oldenlandia corymbosa reveals the biosynthesis and mode of action of anti-cancer metabolites. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 1442–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Tabassam, Q.; Mehmood, T.; Ahmed, S.; Saeed, S.; Raza, A.R.; Anwar, F. GC-MS metabolomics profiling and HR-APCI-MS characterization of potential anticancer compounds and antimicrobial activities of extracts from Picrorhiza kurroa roots. J. Appl. Biomed. 2021, 19, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yu, L.; Li, K.; Zhang, X. Next-generation metabolomics in lung cancer diagnosis, treatment and precision medicine: Mini review. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 115774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zhang, Z.; Su, Q.; Xia, B.; Li, Y.; Qin, X.; Luo, H.; Lin, Y.; Xie, J.; Wu, P.; Lin, L. Integrative transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analysis reveals the dynamic regulation of secondary metabolism upon development of Prunella vulgaris L. Fitoterapia 2022, 163, 105334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Marchev, A.S.; Vasileva, L.V.; Amirova, K.M.; Savova, M.S.; Balcheva-Sivenova, Z.P.; Georgiev, M.I. Metabolomics and health: From nutritional crops and plant-based pharmaceuticals to profiling of human biofluids. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 6487–6503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Safitri, A.; Putri, A.S.; Octavianty, T.D.; Sari, D.R.T. Metabolomic profiles of Curcuma longa L and Cosmos caudatus extracts and their in-silico anti-cancer activity. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume 1665, The 2nd International Seminar on Smart Molecule of Natural Resources (ISSMART) 2020, Malang, Indonesia, 25–26 August 2020; IOP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2020; p. 012022. [Google Scholar]
  84. Guedes, J.A.C.; Santiago, Y.G.; dos Reis Luz, L.; Silva, M.F.S.; Ramires, C.M.C.; de Lima, M.A.C.; de Oliveira, V.R.; do Ó Pessoa, C.; Canuto, K.M.; de Brito, E.S. Comparative analyses of metabolic fingerprint integrated with cytotoxic activity and in silico approaches of the leaves extract of Spondias mombin L. and Spondias tuberosa Arr. Cam. from Northeast, Brazil. Phytochem. Lett. 2020, 40, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Caldana, C.; Degenkolbe, T.; Cuadros-Inostroza, A.; Klie, S.; Sulpice, R.; Leisse, A.; Steinhauser, D.; Fernie, A.R.; Willmitzer, L.; Hannah, M.A. High-density kinetic analysis of the metabolomic and transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis to eight environmental conditions. Plant J. 2011, 67, 869–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sharma, V.; Gupta, P.; Kagolla, P.; Hangargi, B.; Veershetty, A.; Ramrao, D.P.; Suresh, S.; Narasanna, R.; Naik, G.R.; Kumar, A. Metabolomics intervention towards better understanding of plant traits. Cells 2021, 10, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Abdelhafez, O.H.; Othman, E.M.; Fahim, J.R.; Desoukey, S.Y.; Pimentel-Elardo, S.M.; Nodwell, J.R.; Schirmeister, T.; Tawfike, A.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Metabolomics analysis and biological investigation of three Malvaceae plants. Phytochem. Anal. 2020, 31, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Qi, J.; Wei, J.; Liao, D.; Ding, Z.; Yao, X.; Sun, P.; Li, X. Untargeted metabolomics analysis revealed the major metabolites in the seeds of four polygonatum species. Molecules 2022, 27, 1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Stanly, C.; Alfieri, M.; Ambrosone, A.; Leone, A.; Fiume, I.; Pocsfalvi, G. Grapefruit-derived micro and nanovesicles show distinct metabolome profiles and anticancer activities in the A375 human melanoma cell line. Cells 2020, 9, 2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sawada, Y.; Akiyama, K.; Sakata, A.; Kuwahara, A.; Otsuki, H.; Sakurai, T.; Saito, K.; Hirai, M.Y. Widely targeted metabolomics based on large-scale MS/MS data for elucidating metabolite accumulation patterns in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Arkhipov, A.; Sirdaarta, J.; Matthews, B.; Cock, I. Metabolomic Profiling of Kigelia africana Extracts with Anti-Cancer Activity by High Resolution Tandem Mass Spectroscopy. Pharmacogn. Commun. 2014, 4, 10. [Google Scholar]
  92. Daddiouaissa, D.; Amid, A.; Sani, M.S.A.; Elnour, A.A. Evaluation of metabolomics behavior of human colon cancer HT29 cell lines treated with ionic liquid graviola fruit pulp extract. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 270, 113813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Holbrook-Smith, D.; Durot, S.; Sauer, U. High-throughput metabolomics predicts drug-target relationships for eukaryotic proteins. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2022, 18, e10767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Peña, A.G.; Alvarez, M.R.; Delica, K.; Moreno, P.G.; Abogado, R.; Grijaldo, S.J.; Salac, E.L.; Deniega, F.M.; Basingan, M., Jr.; Ravidas, C.M. Antioxidant and anticancer activities of Annona muricata L. and Antidesma bunius L. leaves, and molecular networking analysis using LC-MS/MS metabolomics. South Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 151, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Camargo, F.D.G.; Santamaria-Torres, M.; Cala, M.P.; Guevara-Suarez, M.; Restrepo, S.R.; Sánchez-Camargo, A.; Fernández-Niño, M.; Corujo, M.; Gallo Molina, A.C.; Cifuentes, J. Genome-Scale Metabolic Reconstruction, Non-Targeted LC-QTOF-MS Based Metabolomics Data, and Evaluation of Anticancer Activity of Cannabis sativa Leaf Extracts. Metabolites 2023, 13, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Nocedo-Mena, D.; Ríos, M.; Ramírez-Cisneros, M.; González-Maya, L.; Sánchez-Carranza, J.; Camacho-Corona, M.M.P. Cytotoxic Activity of Cissus incisa Leaves Extracts. Plants 2021, 10, 1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ahmad, N.; Ali, S.M.; Kaewnarin, K.; Lim, A.; Hong, J.H.; Ng, C.; Hamdani, N.I.A.A.; Zaini, N.H.; Ruslan, M.A.; Soon, B.Y. Integrative Metabolomics, Genomics, and Transcriptomics Analysis Unravels Anti-Cancer Potential of Secondary Metabolites in Dillenia Suffruticosa. Res. Sq. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  98. Puah, P.Y.; Lee, D.J.H.; Puah, S.H.; Lah, N.A.S.N.; Ling, Y.S.; Fong, S.Y. High-throughput metabolomics reveals dysregulation of hydrophobic metabolomes in cancer cell lines by Eleusine indica. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Ramos, A.; Alvarez, M.R.; Delica, K.; Moreno, P.G.; Abogado, R.; Grijaldo, S.J.; de Juan, F.; Deniega, F.M.; Basingan, M., Jr.; Radivas, C.M. Antioxidant and anticancer activities of Manilkara zapota and Lansium domesticum leaves coupled with metabolomics analysis using molecular networking. Vietnam J. Chem. 2022, 60, 578–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Castro, C.B.; Luz, L.R.; Guedes, J.A.; Porto, D.D.; Silva, M.F.S.; Silva, G.S.; Ribeiro, P.R.; Canuto, K.M.; Brito, E.S.; Zampieri, D.S. Metabolomics-based discovery of biomarkers with cytotoxic potential in extracts of myracrodruon urundeuva. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2020, 31, 775–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Márquez-Flores, Y.K.; Estrada-Pérez, A.R.; Velasco-Quijano, J.S.; Molina-Urrutia, Z.M.; Rosales-Hernández, M.C.; Fragoso-Morales, L.G.; Meléndez-Camargo, M.E.; Correa-Basurto, J. LC-MS metabolomic evidence metabolites from Oenothera rosea L’ Hér. ex Ait with antiproliferative properties on DU145 human prostate cancer cell line. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 165, 115193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Eltamany, E.E.; Goda, M.S.; Nafie, M.S.; Abu-Elsaoud, A.M.; Hareeri, R.H.; Aldurdunji, M.M.; Elhady, S.S.; Badr, J.M.; Eltahawy, N.A. Comparative assessment of the antioxidant and anticancer activities of Plicosepalus acacia and Plicosepalus curviflorus: Metabolomic profiling and in silico studies. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Malekzadeh, R.; Arjmand, M.; Haji Hosseini, R.; Vaziri, A.; Zamani, Z. Evaluation of the Anticancer Effect of Xanthium Strumarium Root Extract on Human Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells Using 1H NMR-Based Metabolomics. J. Sci. Islam. Repub. Iran 2020, 31, 205–212. [Google Scholar]
  104. Crozier, A.; Clifford, M.N.; Ashihara, H. Plant secondary metabolites. In Occurrence, Structure and Role in the Human Diet; Blackwell Publishers: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  105. Khan, T.; Ali, M.; Khan, A.; Nisar, P.; Jan, S.A.; Afridi, S.; Shinwari, Z.K. Anticancer plants: A review of the active phytochemicals, applications in animal models, and regulatory aspects. Biomolecules 2019, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yoon, D.; Choi, B.-R.; Shin, W.C.; Kim, K.-W.; Lee, Y.-S.; Lee, D.Y. Metabolomics reveals that Curcuma longa and demethoxycurcumin inhibit HCT116 human colon cancer cell growth. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2023, 66, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Li, P.; AnandhiSenthilkumar, H.; Wu, S.-B.; Liu, B.; Guo, Z.-Y.; Fata, J.E.; Kennelly, E.J.; Long, C.-L. Comparative UPLC-QTOF-MS-based metabolomics and bioactivities analyses of Garcinia oblongifolia. J. Chromatogr. B 2016, 1011, 179–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Vijayalakshmi, S.; Yoo, D.-S.; Kim, D.-G.; Chelliah, R.; Barathikannan, K.; Aloo, S.-O.; Tyagi, A.; Yan, P.; Shan, L.; Gebre, T.S. Fermented Perilla frutescens leaves and their untargeted metabolomics by UHPLC-QTOF-MS reveal anticancer and immunomodulatory effects. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. James, A.; Akash, K.; Sharma, A.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Sriamornsak, P.; Nagraik, R.; Kumar, D. Himalayan flora: Targeting various molecular pathways in lung cancer. Med. Oncol. 2023, 40, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Esmeeta, A.; Adhikary, S.; Dharshnaa, V.; Swarnamughi, P.; Maqsummiya, Z.U.; Banerjee, A.; Pathak, S.; Duttaroy, A.K. Plant-derived bioactive compounds in colon cancer treatment: An updated review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 153, 113384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Twilley, D.; Rademan, S.; Lall, N. A review on traditionally used South African medicinal plants, their secondary metabolites and their potential development into anticancer agents. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 261, 113101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Wiegerinck, P.H.; Fluks, L.; Hammink, J.B.; Mulders, S.J.; de Groot, F.M.; van Rozendaal, H.L.; Scheeren, H.W. Semisynthesis of some 7-deoxypaclitaxel analogs from taxine B. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7092–7100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Etheridge, A.S.; Black, S.R.; Patel, P.R.; So, J.; Mathews, J.M. An in vitro evaluation of cytochrome P450 inhibition and P-glycoprotein interaction with goldenseal, Ginkgo biloba, grape seed, milk thistle, and ginseng extracts and their constituents. Planta Medica 2007, 73, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Chieli, E.; Romiti, N.; Rodeiro, I.; Garrido, G. In vitro modulation of ABCB1/P-glycoprotein expression by polyphenols from Mangifera indica. Chem. -Biol. Interact. 2010, 186, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Munari, C.C.; de Oliveira, P.F.; Campos, J.C.L.; Martins, S.d.P.L.; Da Costa, J.C.; Bastos, J.K.; Tavares, D.C. Antiproliferative activity of Solanum lycocarpum alkaloidic extract and their constituents, solamargine and solasonine, in tumor cell lines. J. Nat. Med. 2014, 68, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. De Sousa, O.V.; Vieira, G.D.-V.; de Jesus RG de Pinho, J.; Yamamoto, C.H.; Alves, M.S. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of the ethanol extract of Annona muricata L. leaves in animal models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 2067–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Stankovic, M.S.; Curcic, M.G.; Zizic, J.B.; Topuzovic, M.D.; Solujic, S.R.; Markovic, S.D. Teucrium plant species as natural sources of novel anticancer compounds: Antiproliferative, proapoptotic and antioxidant properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 4190–4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Syed Najmuddin, S.U.F.; Romli, M.F.; Hamid, M.; Alitheen, N.B.; Nik Abd Rahman, N.M.A. Anti-cancer effect of Annona Muricata Linn Leaves Crude Extract (AMCE) on breast cancer cell line. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Shin, S.-A.; Moon, S.Y.; Kim, W.-Y.; Paek, S.-M.; Park, H.H.; Lee, C.S. Structure-based classification and anti-cancer effects of plant metabolites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Jayasri, K.; Padmaja, K.; Saibaba, M. Altered oxidative stress and carbohydrate metabolism in canine mammary tumors. Vet. World 2016, 9, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Zhang, F.; Du, G. Dysregulated lipid metabolism in cancer. World J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 3, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Du, S.; Wang, Y.; Alatrash, N.; Weatherly, C.A.; Roy, D.; MacDonnell, F.M.; Armstrong, D.W. Altered profiles and metabolism of l-and d-amino acids in cultured human breast cancer cells vs. non-tumorigenic human breast epithelial cells. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 164, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wikoff, W.R.; Grapov, D.; Fahrmann, J.F.; DeFelice, B.; Rom, W.N.; Pass, H.I.; Kim, K.; Nguyen, U.; Taylor, S.L.; Gandara, D.R. Metabolomic markers of altered nucleotide metabolism in early stage adenocarcinoma. Cancer Prev. Res. 2015, 8, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zhang, L.; Zheng, J.; Ahmed, R.; Huang, G.; Reid, J.; Mandal, R.; Maksymuik, A.; Sitar, D.S.; Tappia, P.S.; Ramjiawan, B. A high-performing plasma metabolite panel for early-stage lung cancer detection. Cancers 2020, 12, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Liu, C.; Qin, H.; Liu, H.; Wei, T.; Wu, Z.; Shang, M.; Liu, H.; Wang, A.; Liu, J.; Shang, D. Tissue metabolomics identified new biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of pancreatic cancer. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 991051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Dahabiyeh, L.A.; Hudaib, F.; Hourani, W.; Darwish, W.; Abu-Irmaileh, B.; Deb, P.K.; Venugopala, K.N.; Mohanlall, V.; Chandrashekharappa, S.; Abu-Dahab, R. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach and in vitro assays revealed promising role of 2, 3-dihydroquinazolin-4 (1H)-one derivatives against colorectal cancer cell lines. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 182, 106378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lanznaster, D.; De Assis, D.R.; Corcia, P.; Pradat, P.-F.; Blasco, H. Metabolomics biomarkers: A strategy toward therapeutics improvement in ALS. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Rodríguez-Vázquez, G.O.; Diaz-Quiñones, A.O.; Chorna, N.; Salgado-Villanueva, I.K.; Tang, J.; Ortiz, W.I.S.; Maldonado, H.M. Synergistic interactions of cytarabine-adavosertib in leukemic cell lines proliferation and metabolomic endpoints. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 166, 115352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Xie, G.; Wang, C.-Z.; Yu, C.; Qiu, Y.; Wen, X.-D.; Zhang, C.-F.; Yuan, C.-S.; Jia, W. Metabonomic Profiling Reveals Cancer Chemopreventive Effects of American Ginseng on Colon Carcinogenesis in Apc Min/+ Mice. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 3336–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Vuckovic, D. Current trends and challenges in sample preparation for global metabolomics using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 403, 1523–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Jobard, E.; Trédan, O.; Postoly, D.; André, F.; Martin, A.-L.; Elena-Herrmann, B.; Boyault, S. A systematic evaluation of blood serum and plasma pre-analytics for metabolomics cohort studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Posada-Ayala, M.; Zubiri, I.; Martin-Lorenzo, M.; Sanz-Maroto, A.; Molero, D.; Gonzalez-Calero, L.; Fernandez-Fernandez, B.; De La Cuesta, F.; Laborde, C.M.; Barderas, M.G. Identification of a urine metabolomic signature in patients with advanced-stage chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2014, 85, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Dona, A.C.; Jiménez, B.; Schäfer, H.; Humpfer, E.; Spraul, M.; Lewis, M.R.; Pearce, J.T.; Holmes, E.; Lindon, J.C.; Nicholson, J.K. Precision high-throughput proton NMR spectroscopy of human urine, serum, and plasma for large-scale metabolic phenotyping. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 9887–9894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Kwon, H.N.; Lee, H.; Park, J.W.; Kim, Y.-H.; Park, S.; Kim, J.J. Screening for early gastric cancer using a noninvasive urine metabolomics approach. Cancers 2020, 12, 2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Everett, J.R. NMR-based pharmacometabonomics: A new paradigm for personalised or precision medicine. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2017, 102, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Chan, I.S.; Ginsburg, G.S. Personalized medicine: Progress and promise. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2011, 12, 217–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Emara, S.; Amer, S.; Ali, A.; Abouleila, Y.; Oga, A.; Masujima, T. Single-cell metabolomics. Metabolomics Fundam. Clin. Appl. 2017, 965, 323–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Cheung, P.K.; Ma, M.H.; Tse, H.F.; Yeung, K.F.; Tsang, H.F.; Chu, M.K.M.; Kan, C.M.; Cho, W.C.S.; Ng, L.B.W.; Chan, L.W.C. The applications of metabolomics in the molecular diagnostics of cancer. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2019, 19, 785–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. D’Alessandro, A.; Zolla, L. Metabolomics and cancer drug discovery: Let the cells do the talking. Drug Discov. Today 2012, 17, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Priori, R.; Scrivo, R.; Brandt, J.; Valerio, M.; Casadei, L.; Valesini, G.; Manetti, C. Metabolomics in rheumatic diseases: The potential of an emerging methodology for improved patient diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment efficacy. Autoimmun. Rev. 2013, 12, 1022–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Roberts, L.D.; Souza, A.L.; Gerszten, R.E.; Clish, C.B. Targeted metabolomics. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2012, 98, 30.32. 31–30.32. 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Xu, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, R.; He, J.; Chen, Y.; Bi, N.; Song, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhan, Q.; Abliz, Z. Development of a metabolic pathway-based pseudo-targeted metabolomics method using liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Talanta 2019, 192, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ai, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Sun, W.; Liu, Y. Widely targeted metabolomics analysis to reveal transformation mechanism of cistanche deserticola active compounds during steaming and drying processes. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 742511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lane, A.N.; Tan, J.; Wang, Y.; Yan, J.; Higashi, R.M.; Fan, T.W.-M. Probing the metabolic phenotype of breast cancer cells by multiple tracer stable isotope resolved metabolomics. Metab. Eng. 2017, 43, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Liu, L.-W.; Shi, Y.-Y.; Li, Z.-L.; Zuo, L.-H.; Tang, M.; Jing, Z.-W.; Zhao, H.-Y.; Xue, P.; Zhou, L.; Du, Q.-Z. Metabolomic insights into the synergistic effect of biapenem in combination with Xuebijing injection against sepsis. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Wang, Y.-T.; Yang, Y.; Sun, X.-L.; Ji, J. Development of a widely-targeted metabolomics method based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Se Pu = Chin. J. Chromatogr. 2023, 41, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Chen, W.; Gong, L.; Guo, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Xiong, L.; Luo, J. A novel integrated method for large-scale detection, identification, and quantification of widely targeted metabolites: Application in the study of rice metabolomics. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1769–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Luo, P.; Dai, W.; Yin, P.; Zeng, Z.; Kong, H.; Zhou, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, S.; Lu, X.; Xu, G. MRM-Ion Pair Finder: A systematic approach to transform non-targeted mode to pseudo-targeted mode for metabolomics study based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem 2015, 87, 5050–5055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Bayet-Robert, M.; Morvan, D. Metabolomics reveals metabolic targets and biphasic responses in breast cancer cells treated by curcumin alone and in association with docetaxel. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Noorolahi, S.M.; Sadeghi, S.; Mohammadi, M.; Azadi, M.; Rahimi, N.A.; Vahabi, F.; Arjmand, M.; Hosseini, H.; Mosallatpur, S.; Zamani, Z. Metabolomic profiling of cancer cells to Aloe vera extract by 1HNMR spectroscopy. J. Metab. 2016, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Malekzadeh, R.; Arjmand, M.; Akbari, Z.; Sadeghi, S.; Hosseini, R.H. The Effect of Xanthium strumarium Root Extracts on Growth Inhibition of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer SK-OV-3 Cell Line: A Metabolomics-Based Study. Jundishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Prod. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Stéphane, F.F.Y.; Jules, B.K.J.; Batiha, G.; Ali, I.; Bruno, L.N. Extraction of bioactive compounds from medicinal plants and herbs. In Natural Medicinal Plants; InTech Open: London, UK, 2021; pp. 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  153. Jităreanu, A.; Trifan, A.; Vieriu, M.; Caba, I.-C.; Mârțu, I.; Agoroaei, L. Current trends in toxicity assessment of herbal medicines: A narrative review. Processes 2022, 11, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Johnson, C.H.; Ivanisevic, J.; Siuzdak, G. Metabolomics: Beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 17, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Pang, H.; Hu, Z. Metabolomics in drug research and development: The recent advances in technologies and applications. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2023, 13, 3238–3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Guleria, A.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, U.; Raj, R.; Kumar, D. NMR based metabolomics: An exquisite and facile method for evaluating therapeutic efficacy and screening drug toxicity. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 1827–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Wang, P.; Shehu, A.I.; Ma, X. The opportunities of metabolomics in drug safety evaluation. Curr. Pharmacol. Rep. 2017, 3, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Martínez-Sena, T.; Moro, E.; Moreno-Torres, M.; Quintás, G.; Hengstler, J.; Castell, J.V. Metabolomics-based strategy to assess drug hepatotoxicity and uncover the mechanisms of hepatotoxicity involved. Arch. Toxicol. 2023, 97, 1723–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Wang, Z.; Guo, S.; Cai, Y.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yu, X.; Sun, W.; Qiu, S.; Li, X.; Guo, Y. Decoding active compounds and molecular targets of herbal medicine by high-throughput metabolomics technology: A systematic review. Bioorganic Chem. 2024, 144, 107090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Tee, K.B.; Ibrahim, L.; Hashim, N.M.; Saiman, M.Z.; Zakaria, Z.H.; Huri, H.Z. Pharmacokinetic–pharmacometabolomic approach in early-phase clinical trials: A way forward for targeted therapy in type 2 diabetes. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Bukowski, K.; Kciuk, M.; Kontek, R. Mechanisms of multidrug resistance in cancer chemotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Taylor, W.F.; Moghadam, S.E.; Moridi Farimani, M.; Ebrahimi, S.N.; Tabefam, M.; Jabbarzadeh, E. A multi-targeting natural compound with growth inhibitory and anti-angiogenic properties re-sensitizes chemotherapy resistant cancer. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Gnocchi, D.; Del Coco, L.; Girelli, C.R.; Castellaneta, F.; Cesari, G.; Sabbà, C.; Fanizzi, F.P.; Mazzocca, A. 1H-NMR metabolomics reveals a multitarget action of Crithmum maritimum ethyl acetate extract in inhibiting hepatocellular carcinoma cell growth. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Chen, W.; Li, C.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, D.; Zhang, M.; Bo, M.; Li, G. A comprehensive analysis of metabolomics and transcriptomics reveals novel biomarkers and mechanistic insights on lorlatinib crosses the blood-brain barrier. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 722627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Lee, K.-M.; Jeon, J.-Y.; Lee, B.-J.; Lee, H.; Choi, H.-K. Application of metabolomics to quality control of natural product derived medicines. Biomol. Ther. 2017, 25, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Heyman, H.M.; Meyer, J.J.M. NMR-based metabolomics as a quality control tool for herbal products. South Afr. J. Bot. 2012, 82, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Sarkar, R.; Chatterjee, N.; Shaikh, N.; Khan, Z.; Avula, B.; Khan, I.; Banerjee, K. Authentication of Tinospora cordifolia derived herbal supplements using high resolution mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach–A pilot study. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 200, 116835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Dzobo, K. The role of natural products as sources of therapeutic agents for innovative drug discovery. In Comprehensive Pharmacology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 408–422. [Google Scholar]
  169. Lee, S.Y.; Abas, F.; Khatib, A.; Ismail, I.S.; Shaari, K.; Zawawi, N. Metabolite profiling of Neptunia oleracea and correlation with antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities using 1H NMR-based metabolomics. Phytochem. Lett. 2016, 16, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Hu, R.; Li, T.; Yang, Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, L. NMR-based metabolomics in cancer research. In Cancer Metabolomics; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 1280, pp. 201–218. [Google Scholar]
  171. Ding, J.; Feng, Y.-Q. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics for clinical study: Recent progresses and applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 158, 116896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Lin, Y.; Caldwell, G.W.; Li, Y.; Lang, W.; Masucci, J. Inter-laboratory reproducibility of an untargeted metabolomics GC–MS assay for analysis of human plasma. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Sun, W.; Chen, Z.; Hong, J.; Shi, J. Promoting human nutrition and health through plant metabolomics: Current status and challenges. Biology 2020, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Kim, H.K.; Verpoorte, R. Sample preparation for plant metabolomics. Phytochem. Anal. Int. J. Plant Chem. Biochem. Tech. 2010, 21, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Hadidi, L.; Babou, L.; Zaidi, F.; Valentao, P.; Andrade, P.B.; Grosso, C. Quercus ilex L.: How season, plant organ and extraction procedure can influence chemistry and bioactivities. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1600187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Figueiredo, A.; Hugueney, P.; Durazzo, A. Recent Advances in Plant Metabolomics: From Metabolic Pathways to Health Impact. Biology 2022, 11, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Broadhurst, D.I.; Kell, D.B. Statistical strategies for avoiding false discoveries in metabolomics and related experiments. Metabolomics 2006, 2, 171–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Kirwan, J.A.; Gika, H.; Beger, R.D.; Bearden, D.; Dunn, W.B.; Goodacre, R.; Theodoridis, G.; Witting, M.; Yu, L.-R.; Wilson, I.D. Quality assurance and quality control reporting in untargeted metabolic phenotyping: mQACC recommendations for analytical quality management. Metabolomics 2022, 18, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Wehrens, R.; Hageman, J.A.; van Eeuwijk, F.; Kooke, R.; Flood, P.J.; Wijnker, E.; Keurentjes, J.J.; Lommen, A.; van Eekelen, H.D.; Hall, R.D. Improved batch correction in untargeted MS-based metabolomics. Metabolomics 2016, 12, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Godzien, J.; Alonso-Herranz, V.; Barbas, C.; Armitage, E.G. Controlling the quality of metabolomics data: New strategies to get the best out of the QC sample. Metabolomics 2015, 11, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Römisch-Margl, W.; Prehn, C.; Bogumil, R.; Röhring, C.; Suhre, K.; Adamski, J. Procedure for tissue sample preparation and metabolite extraction for high-throughput targeted metabolomics. Metabolomics 2012, 8, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Martin, A.C.; Pawlus, A.D.; Jewett, E.M.; Wyse, D.L.; Angerhofer, C.K.; Hegeman, A.D. Evaluating solvent extraction systems using metabolomics approaches. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 26325–26334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Saw, N.M.M.T.; Suwanchaikasem, P.; Zuniga-Montanez, R.; Qiu, G.; Marzinelli, E.M.; Wuertz, S.; Williams, R.B. Influence of extraction solvent on nontargeted metabolomics analysis of enrichment reactor cultures performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR). Metabolites 2021, 11, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Frederich, M.; Pirotte, B.; Fillet, M.; De Tullio, P. Metabolomics as a challenging approach for medicinal chemistry and personalized medicine. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 8649–8666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Hu, Y.; Li, P.; Wan, J.-B. Current state of the art of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics studies–a review focusing on wide coverage, high throughput and easy identification. Rsc Adv. 2015, 5, 78728–78737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Nikolskiy, I.; Mahieu, N.G.; Chen, Y.-J.; Tautenhahn, R.; Patti, G.J. An untargeted metabolomic workflow to improve structural characterization of metabolites. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 7713–7719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Verhoeven, H.; Ric de Vos, C.; Bino, R.; Hall, R. Plant metabolomics strategies based upon quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (QTOF-MS). In Plant Metabolomics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 33–48. [Google Scholar]
  188. Aharoni, A.; Ric de Vos, C.; Verhoeven, H.A.; Maliepaard, C.A.; Kruppa, G.; Bino, R.; Goodenowe, D.B. Nontargeted metabolome analysis by use of Fourier transform ion cyclotron mass spectrometry. Omics A J. Integr. Biol. 2002, 6, 217–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Draper, J.; Lloyd, A.J.; Goodacre, R.; Beckmann, M. Flow infusion electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry for high throughput, non-targeted metabolite fingerprinting: A review. Metabolomics 2013, 9, 4–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Markley, J.L.; Brüschweiler, R.; Edison, A.S.; Eghbalnia, H.R.; Powers, R.; Raftery, D.; Wishart, D.S. The future of NMR-based metabolomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 43, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Bingol, K.; Bruschweiler-Li, L.; Yu, C.; Somogyi, A.; Zhang, F.; Bruschweiler, R. Metabolomics beyond spectroscopic databases: A combined MS/NMR strategy for the rapid identification of new metabolites in complex mixtures. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 3864–3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Silva, C.L.; Perestrelo, R.; Capelinha, F.; Tomás, H.; Câmara, J.S. An integrative approach based on GC–qMS and NMR metabolomics data as a comprehensive strategy to search potential breast cancer biomarkers. Metabolomics 2021, 17, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Wei, R.; Li, G.; Seymour, A.B. High-throughput and multiplexed LC/MS/MRM method for targeted metabolomics. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 5527–5533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Sumner, L.W.; Lei, Z.; Nikolau, B.J.; Saito, K. Modern plant metabolomics: Advanced natural product gene discoveries, improved technologies, and future prospects. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 212–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Rocca-Serra, P.; Salek, R.M.; Arita, M.; Correa, E.; Dayalan, S.; Gonzalez-Beltran, A.; Ebbels, T.; Goodacre, R.; Hastings, J.; Haug, K. Data standards can boost metabolomics research, and if there is a will, there is a way. Metabolomics 2016, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Menyhárt, O.; Győrffy, B. Multi-omics approaches in cancer research with applications in tumor subtyping, prognosis, and diagnosis. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 949–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Alseekh, S.; Wu, S.; Brotman, Y.; Fernie, A.R. Guidelines for sample normalization to minimize batch variation for large-scale metabolic profiling of plant natural genetic variance. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1778, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  198. Han, Y.; Zhang, A.-H.; Zhang, Y.-Z.; Sun, H.; Meng, X.-C.; Wang, X.-J. Chemical metabolomics for investigating the protective effectiveness of Acanthopanax senticosus Harms leaf against acute promyelocytic leukemia. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 11983–11990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Vargas-Madriz, Á.F.; Luzardo-Ocampo, I.; Moreno-Celis, U.; Roldán-Padrón, O.; Chávez-Servín, J.L.; Vergara-Castañeda, H.A.; Martínez-Pacheco, M.; Mejía, C.; García-Gasca, T.; Kuri-García, A. Comparison of Phytochemical Composition and Untargeted Metabolomic Analysis of an Extract from Cnidoscolus aconitifolius (Mill.) II Johnst and Porophyllum ruderale (Jacq.) Cass. and Biological Cytotoxic and Antiproliferative Activity In Vitro. Plants 2023, 12, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Johnson, C.H.; Gonzalez, F.J. Challenges and opportunities of metabolomics. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012, 227, 2975–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Qiu, S.; Zhang, A.; Sun, H.; Wang, X. Current Status of Technical Challenges in Mass Spectrometry-Driven Metabolomics. In Mass Spectrometry—Based Metabolomics in Clinical and Herbal Medicines: Strategies, Technologies and Applications; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  202. Hoang, G.; Udupa, S.; Le, A. Application of metabolomics technologies toward cancer prognosis and therapy. In International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 347, pp. 191–223. [Google Scholar]
  203. Dettmer, K.; Aronov, P.A.; Hammock, B.D. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2007, 26, 51–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Wernisch, S.; Pennathur, S. Evaluation of coverage, retention patterns, and selectivity of seven liquid chromatographic methods for metabolomics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 6079–6091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Nagana Gowda, G.; Raftery, D. NMR-based metabolomics. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021, 1280, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  206. Xi, B.; Gu, H.; Baniasadi, H.; Raftery, D. Statistical analysis and modeling of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics data. Methods Mol Biol. 2014, 1198, 333–353. [Google Scholar]
  207. Percival, B.; Gibson, M.; Leenders, J.; Wilson, P.B.; Grootveld, M. Univariate and Multivariate Statistical Approaches to the Analysis and Interpretation of NMR-Based Metabolomics Datasets of Increasing Complexity; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Zhou, Z.; Luo, M.; Zhang, H.; Yin, Y.; Cai, Y.; Zhu, Z.-J. Metabolite annotation from knowns to unknowns through knowledge-guided multi-layer metabolic networking. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Chaleckis, R.; Meister, I.; Zhang, P.; Wheelock, C.E. Challenges, progress and promises of metabolite annotation for LC–MS-based metabolomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 55, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Wang, C.; Zhang, B.; Timári, I.; Somogyi, Á.; Li, D.-W.; Adcox, H.E.; Gunn, J.S.; Bruschweiler-Li, L.; Brüschweiler, R. Accurate and efficient determination of unknown metabolites in metabolomics by NMR-based molecular motif identification. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 15686–15693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Wang, F.; Wei, C.; Zheng, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, C.; Lu, X.; Xu, G. Enhancing Metabolome Annotation by Electron Impact Excitation of Ions from Organics-Molecular Networking. Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 1444–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Yang, Z.; Nakabayashi, R.; Okazaki, Y.; Mori, T.; Takamatsu, S.; Kitanaka, S.; Kikuchi, J.; Saito, K. Toward better annotation in plant metabolomics: Isolation and structure elucidation of 36 specialized metabolites from Oryza sativa (rice) by using MS/MS and NMR analyses. Metabolomics 2014, 10, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Horai, H.; Arita, M.; Kanaya, S.; Nihei, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Suwa, K.; Ojima, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, S.; Aoshima, K. MassBank: A public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 45, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Smith, C.A.; O’Maille, G.; Want, E.J.; Qin, C.; Trauger, S.A.; Brandon, T.R.; Custodio, D.E.; Abagyan, R.; Siuzdak, G. METLIN: A metabolite mass spectral database. Ther. Drug Monit. 2005, 27, 747–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Akiyama, K.; Chikayama, E.; Yuasa, H.; Shimada, Y.; Tohge, T.; Shinozaki, K.; Hirai, M.Y.; Sakurai, T.; Kikuchi, J.; Saito, K. PRIMe: A Web site that assembles tools for metabolomics and transcriptomics. Silico Biol. 2008, 8, 339–345. [Google Scholar]
  216. Liu, Y.; Liu, H.-Z.; Chen, D.-K.; Zeng, H.-Y.; Chen, Y.-L.; Yao, N. PlantMetSuite: A user-friendly web-based tool for metabolomics analysis and visualisation. Plants 2023, 12, 2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Borland, L.; Brickhouse, M.; Thomas, T.; Fountain, A.W. Review of chemical signature databases. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 397, 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Baumeister, T.U.; Vallet, M.; Kaftan, F.; Svatoš, A.; Pohnert, G. Live single-cell metabolomics with matrix-free laser/desorption ionization mass spectrometry to address microalgal physiology. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Katam, R.; Lin, C.; Grant, K.; Katam, C.S.; Chen, S. Advances in plant metabolomics and its applications in stress and single-cell biology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Wang, L.; Chen, C. Emerging applications of metabolomics in studying chemopreventive phytochemicals. AAPS J. 2013, 15, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structure of plant secondary metabolites identified by metabolomics studies reviewed in this paper. Anticancer activity exerted by these compounds is due to individual or synergistic effects. Compounds highlighted in blue are involved in anticancer synergistic effects. Compounds highlighted in pink are suggested to be related to anticancer activity of extract.
Figure 1. Structure of plant secondary metabolites identified by metabolomics studies reviewed in this paper. Anticancer activity exerted by these compounds is due to individual or synergistic effects. Compounds highlighted in blue are involved in anticancer synergistic effects. Compounds highlighted in pink are suggested to be related to anticancer activity of extract.
Pharmaceuticals 17 01307 g001
Figure 2. Plant metabolomics in drug discovery: concept, process, and outcomes.
Figure 2. Plant metabolomics in drug discovery: concept, process, and outcomes.
Pharmaceuticals 17 01307 g002
Table 2. Examples of some plants and their main cancer inhibition pathways.
Table 2. Examples of some plants and their main cancer inhibition pathways.
PlantAltered Metabolic PathwayCancer TypeStudy
Aloe vera (leaves)Protein biosynthesis, catecholamine biosynthesis, mitochondria transport chain, and pentose
phosphate pathway.
Raji cell lines
(cancerous lymphoma cells)
[150]
American ginseng
(Panax quinquefolius L.)
Amino acid, lipids, and carbohydrates metabolism. Metabolites involved in inflammation and
oxidation.
Colon carcinogenesis[129]
Xanthium strumariumTyrosine metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, fatty acid
biosynthesis, and glycerolipid metabolism.
Ovarian cancer cell line (A2780cp)[103]
Xanthium strumariumAminoacyl-tRNA synthesis, glycerolipid metabolism,
fatty acid biosynthesis, and biotin metabolism.
Epithelial ovarian
cancer cell line (SK-OV-3)
[151]
Table 3. Illustration of the key points for designing an effective metabolomics study for the investigation of medicinal plants in cancer research.
Table 3. Illustration of the key points for designing an effective metabolomics study for the investigation of medicinal plants in cancer research.
Procedure
standardization
To considerThe metabolomics procedure including sample preparation, measurement and data analysis should be standardized [67].
BenefitStandardization of all the steps facilitates the direct comparison of data obtained in different laboratories (inter/intra-laboratory exchanges). This helps to ensure reproducibility [172], and broaden the identification of key metabolites; it also permits the building of comprehensive metabolomics databases [173].
Plant collection, sample size, preparation and extraction To consider- Plant samples should be quickly collected [174].
- The season and the tissue from which the bioactive compounds are to be isolated should be carefully chosen [20,175].
Benefit- Avoiding activity loss and change in metabolites’ composition [130,175,176].
- Obtaining the highest activity of metabolites.
To considerSamples should be immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80˚ C or lyophilized.
BenefitAvoiding any significant changes in plant composition [20].
To considerThe sample size should be considered.
BenefitAvoiding non-reliable results [177].
To considerQuality assurance (QA) (the measures implemented by the laboratory to ensure that quality standards will be fulfilled) and quality control (QC) samples (the quality of untargeted data is ensured by preparing various types of mixtures) should be used in untargeted metabolomics studies.
Benefit- Acquiring high-quality publishable data.
- Avoiding batch variations [178,179,180].
To considerAn efficient extraction method using a solvent system with the proper solvent and solvent-to-sample ratio should be used. Attention should be paid to the extraction duration.
BenefitAn effective extraction method enables the extraction of the maximum quantity of metabolites and provides access to low abundant compounds that are difficult to extract. It also helps in achieving reproducible quantification of metabolites [20,181,182,183].
Combining metabolomics studies and
anticancer activity
bioassays
To considerMetabolomics results should be compared to data from biological assays.
Benefit- Achieving reliable correlations between the identified phytochemicals and the biological activity of the extract.
- Achieving good discrimination between the different samples based on their activity, in correlation with metabolites identification [184].
MS-based
metabolomics
analysis
To considerMetabolomics approach involving experimental deconvolution of the tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data acquired in a broad MS isolation window (ex. 9 Da) is recommended (For more details, see reference) [185,186].
Direct analysis of the samples using quadrupole (Q) time of flight-mass spectrometry (TOF-MS) [187] or a Fourier transform ion cyclotron MS (FT-MS) [188] or direct infusion of the samples using direct infusion mass spectrometry (DIMS) and flow infusion mass spectrometry (FIMS) is highly useful [189].
Benefit- The experimental deconvolution of MS/MS data acquired in a broad MS isolation window permits to obtain high quality spectra and the identification of novel metabolite [185,186].
- TOF instruments provides high mass accuracy and high resolution, and allows to detect large diversity of masses [187].
- Fourier transform ion cyclotron MS (FT-MS) eliminates any need for chromatography prior to analysis [188].
- Direct infusion mass spectrometry provides reduced instrument cycle times, reduced sample pretreatment and high-throughput screening (analysis of more than 1000 samples/week) [189].
NMR-based metabolomics analysisTo considerThe use of NMR analysis for metabolomics studies is highly recommended.
BenefitQuantification of metabolites [190].
Combining
analytical platforms
(MS-NMR)
To considerThe integration of different analytical platforms (mass spectrometry (MS) and NMR techniques) in a metabolomics study is highly recommended. [191,192].
BenefitObtaining broader metabolome coverage and high-quality data using hyphenated separation platforms [191,192].
Sample analysis
by MS-based
targeted
metabolomics
To consider- Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to a triple quadrupole MS (UPLCQqQ-MS), which is operated in MRM (Multiple Reaction Monitoring) mode is an ideal technique to be used in targeted metabolomics [193,194].
Attention to false positives is necessary [177]. False positives might be observed as a result of isomeric metabolites having similar product ion used to detect the target compounds, but are inadequately separated by liquid chromatography [193,194].
Benefit- UPLCQqQ-MS is sensitive, reproducible, characterizes a wide range of compounds, and allows for robust quantification [193,194].
- Avoiding false metabolic data [177].
To considerMetabolomics data standards are useful.
BenefitEnsure reproducible research [195].
Integrated
metabolomics
analysis
To considerMetabolomics studies should be integrated with other Omics studies including genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics is highly recommended.
Benefit- Obtaining a comprehensive picture of cancer metabolism [196].
- Revealing biosynthetic pathways and mechanisms of action of active metabolites [78].
Data
normalization
To considerMetabolomics data should be normalized.
Benefit- Minimizing batch-to-batch variations.
- Important for large-scale metabolomics analyses [197].
Metabolomic
profiling in
relation to
previous studies
To considerMetabolic profiling of plants previously reported to have anticancer activity is highly useful.
Benefit- The generation of a database will allow for robust differentiation of active extracts and for the selection of target bioactive metabolites.
- Speeding up drug discovery from anticancer plants [91].
Assessing
response to
treatment
To considerAnalysis of the biological sample (cells/tissues) following treatment with plant extracts/extracted plant compounds is useful.
Benefit- Validation of the effectiveness of the extract/extracted bioactive compounds.
- Elucidation of the metabolic alterations induced in the host cell upon treatment.
- Understanding the impact of the treatment on cancer metabolism [198,199].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dabbousy, R.; Rima, M.; Roufayel, R.; Rahal, M.; Legros, C.; Sabatier, J.-M.; Fajloun, Z. Plant Metabolomics: The Future of Anticancer Drug Discovery. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101307

AMA Style

Dabbousy R, Rima M, Roufayel R, Rahal M, Legros C, Sabatier J-M, Fajloun Z. Plant Metabolomics: The Future of Anticancer Drug Discovery. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(10):1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101307

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dabbousy, Ranin, Mohamad Rima, Rabih Roufayel, Mohamad Rahal, Christian Legros, Jean-Marc Sabatier, and Ziad Fajloun. 2024. "Plant Metabolomics: The Future of Anticancer Drug Discovery" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 10: 1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101307

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop