Open AccessArticle

Gold Nanoparticle-Coated ZrO₂-Nanofiber Surface as a SERS-Active Substrate for Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue

Han Lee

¹,

Jiunn-Der Liao

^1,2,*,

Kundan Sivashanmugan

¹,

Bernard Haochih Liu

Wei-en Fu

³,

Chih-Chien Chen

¹,

Guo Dung Chen

³ and

Yung-Der Juang

⁴

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan

Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan

Center for Measurement Standards, Industrial Technology Research Institute, No. 321, Kuang Fu Road, Sec. 2, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan

⁴

Department of Materials Science, National University of Tainan, Tainan 700, Taiwan

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Nanomaterials 2018, 8(6), 402; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060402

Submission received: 4 May 2018 / Revised: 28 May 2018 / Accepted: 1 June 2018 / Published: 3 June 2018

Download

Browse Figures

Graphical abstract
"> Figure 1
(a) Steps for preparing Au NPs/ZrO2 NFs: 1. mixing isopropanol with ZrCl4; 2. forming ZrO2 thin film by spin-coating method; 3. forming ZrO2 NFs by removing solvents; (b) steps for depositing Au NPs upon ZrO2 NFs by e-beam evaporator; (c) SERS mechanism based on Au NPs deposited upon random ZrO2 NFs; (d) SERS signals from Au NPs deposited upon ZrO2 NFs, no Raman signal from the surface of Au NPs upon Si (100) and ZrO2 NFs without the integration of Au NPs. "> Figure 2
XRD patterns of ZrO2 NFs with different ZrCl4 concentrations. "> Figure 3
SEM micrographs of ZrO2 NFs with different ZrCl4 concentrations. Morphologies from the surfaces of NPs/ZrO2 NFs_X with (a) X = 0.05 (b) X = 0.1, (c) X = 0.2, (d) X = 0.3, (e) X = 0.4, and (f) X = 0.5. "> Figure 4
The effect of SERS on Au NPs deposited upon random ZrO2 NFs with different ZrCl4 concentrations were evaluated using the molecular probe R6G and different Raman laser wavelengths. (a) and (b) are the intensity and enhancement factor of 633 nm laser; similarly to (c) and (d) with 785 nm laser. "> Figure 5
(a) The characteristic SERS peaks for the pesticides P1, C1, P2 and C2 at the concentration of 10−3 M; (b) SERS signals from 7 samples (i to vii) for the subsequent mixture of P1, C1, P2 and C2. Their characteristic peaks were identified. "> Figure 6
SERS spectra (a) from the pesticide-containing apple peels in comparison with (b) a standard solution. ">

Versions Notes

Abstract

Trace detection of common pesticide residue is necessary to assure safety of fruit and vegetables, given that the potential health risk to consumers is attributed to the contamination of the sources. A simple, rapid and effective means of finding the residue is however required for household purposes. In recent years, the technique in association with surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) has been well developed in particular for trace detection of target molecules. Herein, gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) were integrated with sol-gel spin-coated Zirconia nanofibers (ZrO₂ NFs) as a chemically stable substrate and used for SERS application. The morphologies of Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs were adjusted by the precursor concentrations (_X, X = 0.05–0.5 M) and the effect of SERS on Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_X was evaluated by different Raman laser wavelengths using rhodamine 6G as the probe molecule at low concentrations. The target pesticides, phosmet (P1), carbaryl (C1), permethrin (P2) and cypermethrin (C2) were thereafter tested and analyzed. Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3 exhibited an enhancement factor of 2.1 × 10⁷, which could detect P1, C1, P2 and C2 at the concentrations down to 10⁻⁸, 10⁻⁷, 10⁻⁷ and 10⁻⁶ M, respectively. High selectivity to the organophosphates was also found. As the pesticides were dip-coated on an apple and then measured on the diluted juice containing sliced apple peels, the characteristic peaks of each pesticide could be clearly identified. It is thus promising to use NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3 as a novel SERS-active substrate for trace detection of pesticide residue upon, for example, fruits or vegetables.

Keywords:

surface-enhanced Raman scattering; pesticide residue; gold nanoparticles; Zirconia nanofibers

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Agricultural production and safety, food industries, as well as the consumers are of great concern to governments [1]. The use of pesticides in agricultural products aims to increase the yield, as well as improve the quality of crops. Pesticide residue in food and in the environment provokes great public concern since it could pose potential health risks to not only the consumers but also the earth. Various analytical methods, including gas chromatography [2] and high-performance liquid chromatography [3], have been applied for trace detection of pesticides [4,5]. However, these methods are time consuming, labor intensive, and usually require complicated procedures for sample preparation. Thus, research has been conducted to develop advanced detection techniques instead of traditional methods to provide rapid, nondestructive food quality and safety evaluation and analysis for the industry [1].

As an emerging technology, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) techniques are becoming increasingly widespread and accessible for accurate and specific identification of chemical or microbiological contaminants in foodstuffs [6]. Over the past decades, the technique of SERS has been well developed as a sensitive and selective method, using, for example, nanostructured surfaces [7]. When target species with Raman-active modes are adsorbed on a nanostructured surface of noble metal(s), particular peak enhancement can be found in the Raman spectrum. Target species could be identified by verifying the specific fingerprints, which comprise information about vibrational modes in compounds. Advances in nanofabrication techniques have assisted the as-prepared substrates capable of lowering the detection limit of sensing target molecules or biomolecules. Particular enhancement of Raman-active modes is mainly attributed to two mechanisms: a chemical [8] and an electromagnetic (EM) effect [9]. For the former, as the target molecules are chemically adsorbed upon a SERS-active substrate, Raman-active modes in molecules can be enhanced in different degrees, depending on the distances of the modes with respect to the substrate surface [10]. For the latter, a strong EM may be generated from the morphologies of nanostructures. As the target species is trapped/adhered to the proximity of a metal nanostructure (usually Au, Ag or Cu), Raman intensity is enhanced due to the amplification of the EM field resonance, not only by the size and shape of the nanostructure, but also the interactions among Raman laser wavelength, the target species, and the substrate surface in the microenvironment [11].

Researchers have investigated the formation of hot spots, which are small regions of a highly enhanced EM field that leads to high enhancement factor (EF). These regions can be observed or even predicted using computer simulation and modeling to describe the quantum effect on subnanometer gaps [12]. Usually, a noble metal surface with the structure of high roughness [7], edges [13], hollow cavities [14], and so on, is advantageous to produce EM as well as surface plasmon [15]. Strategies for fabricating nanostructures can be categorized as, for example, top-down [4], bottom-up [16], combination [17], and template-assisted techniques [18]. In addition, for example, Zirconia (ZrO₂), especially the thin-film type, is one of the promising common materials used for a base SERS-active substrate. [19] By manipulating the structure of ZrO₂ into, for example, a nanofiber, a large surface area is gained. As the ZrO₂ nanofibers’ (ZrO₂/NFs’) structure is combined with gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) to gain the EM effect between NPs or intra-Au NPs [13], the hybrid nanostructure may increase EM at the metal–semiconductor junction and generate a strong local EM field at the interface. [20] In addition, Au NPs embedded in ZrO₂ NFs are competent to prevent the electron-hole pairs from recombination; thus a significant enhancement of SERS is anticipated.

In this work, ZrO₂ NFs are therefore made by a spin-coated sol-gel method and formed as templates; subsequently, Au NPs are deposited upon ZrO₂ NFs. The as-designed Au NPs embedded upon ZrO₂ NFs as the substrate (denoted as Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs) is proposed. The structure of NFs is designed to increase the surface areas for detecting the target species, while the embedded Au NPs upon the as-formed ZrO₂ NFs are anticipated to gain the additional effect of SERS. Thereafter, different pesticides at low concentrations are tested and measured to interpret their competences for trace detection of pesticide residue.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Fabrication of ZrO₂ NFs and NPs/ZrO₂ NFs

Zirconium tetrachloride (ZrCl₄, 98%, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) was used as the precursor for the synthesis of ZrO₂. The precursor solutions with various concentrations were prepared by dissolving appropriate amounts of ZrCl₄ in 10 mL isopropanol (99.8%, Panreac AppliChem Barcelona, Spain). After vigorous stirring, the precursor solutions were stored in sealed glassware and aged at room temperature for 24 h. 100 μL of the precursor solution was spin-coated onto a 2 cm × 2 cm silicon wafer at 2500 rpm for 30 s at an ambient temperature and relative humidity of 25 °C and 70%, respectively. Prior to coating, silicon wafers were pre-cleaned with hydrochloric acid (37%, Panreac AppliChem, Barcelona, Spain) and then ethanol (99.9%, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) to remove the organic contaminants on the surface. The as-prepared samples were heated at 100 °C for 10 min to evaporate the solvent and then calcined at 500 °C for 3 h in the air for densification. The as-formed ZrO₂ NFs are distinguished as ZrO₂ NFs_X, where X is the concentration of precursor in M. The fabrication procedures of ZrO₂ NFs are simply illustrated in Figure 1a.

Au NPs were then deposited onto ZrO₂ NFs by using an electron beam evaporator (VT1-10CE, ULVAC Inc., Chigasaki, Japan) with a thickness of about 1.5 nm and at a rate of 0.1 Å/s. The deposition was operated under ultra-high vacuum conditions maintained below 7 × 10⁻⁶ torr. The SEM images after deposition are shown in Supporting Data 1 (a) with a magnification of 5 × 10⁵, and Supporting Data 1 (b) with a higher magnification of 10⁶. The results show that the nano-sized Au NP gold particles closely arranged on the nanofiber surface. In addition, the Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) mapping image of the cross-sectioned sample AuNPs/ZrO₂NFs_0.3 is shown in the Supporting Data 2. The particle-size distribution of the nano-Au NPs with the range from 30 to 45 nm is also shown in the Supporting Data 3, in which a narrow distribution curve represents a uniform size of Au NPs. The as-formed samples were distinguished as Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_X, where X is the concentration of precursor in M. The fabrication of Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_X is simply illustrated in Figure 1b. As illustrated in Figure 1c with Au NPs deposited upon ZrO₂ NFs, intra-Au NP interactions (marked “1” in the figure) tend to be much stronger than electron transfer at the junction. In case of Au NPs distributed over ZrO₂ NFs (marked “2” in the figure), there exists a recombination of electron-hole pairs, leading to a significant improvement of SERS properties. As appropriate laser wavelength is applied, surface plasmon resonance of Au NPs and hot spots between Au NPs may presumably occur and contribute to the effect of SERS.

2.2. Structural and Morphological Characterization

The compositions of ZrO₂ NFs and NPs/ZrO₂ NFs were analyzed by an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, MiniFlex II, Rigaku, Japan) using CuKα radiation with scanning angles ranging from 20° to 61.5°. The obtained XRD patterns were compared with JCPDS card No. 89-6976 [21] and 65-1022 [22]. The photo-images of the surfaces of ZrO₂ NFs and NPs/ZrO₂ NFs were taken by a high-resolution thermal field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JSM-7000, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), which was operated at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. All the samples subsequent to FE-SEM were platinum-coated in advance. The dimensions of ZrO₂ NFs and Au NPs were thereafter presented and determined by FE-SEM photo-images and software Image J (National Institutes of Health, USA).

2.3. Enhancement Evaluation for the Effect of SERS

The test probe molecule, rhodamine 6G (R6G), was used as the referenced target species. R6G was diluted in aqueous solution to a concentration of 10⁻³ M as the standard solution. A quantity of 5 μL R6G standard solution was then placed on each substrate and dried at room temperature for subsequent analysis. A Raman spectrum was obtained by using Raman spectrometer with a confocal microscope (Renishaw, United Kingdom). He-Ne and diode lasers with excitation wavelengths of 633 and 785 nm were respectively applied. An air-cooled CCD was used as the detector and the incident power was about 3 mW. The samples were scanned with an exposure time of 10 s over an area of 1 μm × 1 μm (the size of the laser spot was 1 μm, as shown in Figure 1d), using a 50× objective. The SERS spectra were averaged from 10 consecutive measurements on different samples. All Raman spectra were normalized by using the peak fit software.

2.4. Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue and Those on Apples

The optimal SERS-active substrates were thereafter examined using four types of pesticides, namely phosmet (P1), carbaryl (C1), permethrin (P2) and cypermethrin (C2). An aqueous solution of each pesticide was diluted to concentrations ranging from 10⁻² to 10⁻¹⁰ M. To verify the effect of SERS with respect to organophosphates, mixed pesticides were prepared to the concentration of 10⁻³ M. A quantity of 5 μL from single and diluted pesticide and mixed pesticides were respectively placed on the substrates and dried at room temperature for subsequent analyses. The test apples were purchased from a local market and then immersed in a solution of each pesticide in 10⁻² M. The apple containing pesticide on the surface was thereafter cut into pieces. Each pesticide on the outer surface of the sliced apple was extracted by soaking a 1 cm × 1 cm apple peel in 500 μL ethanol. The as-formed mixture was then vigorously shaken for 10 min and subjected to 4500 rpm of centrifugation for 5 min. A final product with a quantity of 5 μL was placed on the respective substrates and dried at room temperature for subsequent analyses.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Quality of ZrO₂ NFs and Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs

In Figure 2, XRD patterns of ZrO₂ NFs obtained from the various precursor concentrations are shown. Characteristic peaks of tetragonal zirconia, namely (011), (002), (110), (112), (020), (013) and (121) resulted. Additional peaks from monoclinic zirconia, including (−111), (111) and (311), were also observed. The result indicates that ZrO₂ is successfully prepared by a spin-coated sol-gel method. Nevertheless, the intensity of the characteristic peaks is lowered with the decreased concentration of precursor solution as the coverage of the generated ZrO₂ is still insufficient.

In Figure 3, FE–SEM photo-images of Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs were obtained from various precursor concentrations, corresponding to their XRD patterns (ZrO₂ NFs) shown in Figure 2. At the beginning, the base ZrO₂ NFs were significantly generated, as the precursor concentrations were higher than 0.2 M (i.e., ZrO₂ NFs_0.2, _0.3, _0.4, and _0.5); the diameter of ZrO₂ NFs was measured around 35 to 50 nm. With the decreased precursor concentrations, that is, ZrO₂ NFs_0.05 and _0.1, the surface of ZrO₂ NFs was broad and flat, as shown in Figure 3a,b. From Figure 3c–f, as the precursor concentration was increased, the hydrolytic rate was decreased; the morphology of the base ZrO₂ NFs became agglomerated and connected with thinner nanofibers. As the increase of surface areas for the subsequent Au NP deposition is of significance, ZrO₂ NFs with distinct size and dimension of nanofibers are preferable in this study. Thereafter, the sample Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3 (Figure 3d) suitably resulted. As determined by software Image J from 200 random Au NPs, the diameter of Au NPs in the range from 30 to 45 nm was averaged, which was corresponding to the rough diameter of ZrO₂ NFs.

3.2. The Effect of SERS for the Samples of Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs

In Figure 4, SERS spectra were taken from the samples of Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs with the test molecule R6G of 10⁻³ M attached to them. The Raman laser with the wavelengths of 633 (Figure 4a) and 785 nm (Figure 4c) were respectively used. The characteristic peaks of R6G upon Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs were significantly detected and enhanced, as compared to the flat substrate. The most intense peak at 1361 cm⁻¹, which is assigned to the stretching of C–C in aromatics, is usually used to calculate the EF. By taking the peak at 1361 cm⁻¹ as the reference, the peak enhancement by 633 nm laser wavelength was higher than that by 785 nm. In Figure 4b,d, Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3 showed the most intense EF of 2.1 × 10⁷ under the excitation of 633 nm laser wavelength, which is corresponding to the sample with distinct size and dimension of nanofibers, shown in Figure 3d. Particularly, the gaps between the aggregated Au NPs generate abundant “hot-spot” structures for SERS, which are homogeneously distributed on the substrate, making a robust and reproducible enhancement of the Raman signal feasible.

3.3. Trace Detection of Pesticides Using the Optimal Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3

Using Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3 as the substrate, in Figure 5a, the characteristic SERS peaks for P1, C1, P2 and C2 in 10⁻³ M were examined and taken as the references. The major characteristic peaks of P1 (606, 654, 713, 1192, 1379, 1407 and 1776 cm⁻¹), C1 (713, 1379, 1441 and 1582 cm⁻¹), P2 (1002, 1017, 1162, 1209 and 1582 cm⁻¹) and C2 (1002, 1017, 1162, 1209, 1582 and 2130 cm⁻¹) were identified. The most intense peaks of P1 (606 cm⁻¹, δ(C=O)), C1 (1379 cm⁻¹, symmetric ring vibration), P2 (1002 cm⁻¹, benzene ring breathing vibration) and C2 (1002 cm⁻¹, benzene ring breathing vibration) were respectively determined at low concentrations of pesticides. The limits of detection were estimated as 10⁻⁶ M for cypermethrin (C2), 10⁻⁷ M for carbaryl (C1) and permethrin (P2), and 10⁻⁸ M for phosmet (P1), which in practice, meet the trace concentration requirement of, for example, food security [23]. There are five samples per test group. Each sample is performed from 20 spots. The results of using these concentrations can be found in the Supporting Data 4–8.

The application of SERS to analyze multiple pesticides (in 10⁻³ M) was carried out using Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3 as the substrate. The characteristic peaks of each pesticide, shown in Figure 5a, were used as the references for the presence of the pesticides. In Figure 5b, qualitative measurements from seven identical solutions with multiple pesticides showed that Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3 was competent to distinguish the presence of four pesticides. Relatively low peak intensities naturally resulted from a low concentration of each pesticide. However, due to the overlapping of peaks, increases of relative peak intensities were found at 1002 cm⁻¹ for P2 and C2, and at 1379 cm⁻¹ for P1 and C1.

ZrO₂ shows a strong affinity to phosphoryl group [24], which could make organophosphates more competitive to adsorb on the ZrO₂ surface. To verify the effect of ZrO₂ templates on organophosphates, the reduction of Raman intensity for each pesticide in various mixtures compared to that in standard solutions is shown in Table 1. The reduction of Raman intensity of phosmet [25], which is an organophosphate, was less than the other pesticides in the mixtures. The results indicate that Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3 exhibited higher selectivity to organophosphates due to the property of ZrO₂ templates. The utilization of ZrO₂ NFs can be exploited as a substrate for enhancing Raman intensity on the adsorbed molecules. ZrO₂ showed a strong affinity toward the phosphate group on parathion molecules, which provides sensitivity and selectivity of the sensing film [26], as nitroaromatic NPs strongly bind to the ZrO₂ nanofiber surface [27]. The deposition of gold particles on the fibers further amplifies Raman signals due to SERS. This study suggests that Raman signals can be finely tuned in intensity and effectively enhanced in nanofiber mats and arrays by properly tailoring the architecture, composition and light-scattering properties of the complex networks of filaments. In addition, the large area of inter-Au NP surface plasmon resonance on ZrO₂ NFs as a SERS-active substrate was applied to distinguish multiple pesticides due to their formation of hot spots (Figure 1).

3.4. Detection of Simulated Pesticides on Apples

According to world food ethics (which are based on USA food rules) [28], the agricultural crops contaminated with residual pesticides (C1, P1, C2, P2) are certainly harmful to human health [29]. To simulate the detection of pesticides on fruits, apples were spiked with 10⁻² M standard solution containing C1, P1, C2 and P2. Subsequently, the apple peels were soaked in ethanol to extract pesticides. The concentration of each pesticide in extracts was calculated to 10⁻⁴ M. SERS spectra containing pesticides extracted from apple peels are shown in Figure 6a. The characteristic peaks in the obtained SERS spectra matched those in the SERS spectra from the standard solutions, as shown in Figure 6b. The enhancement was attributed to high EM effect, which was mainly induced by Au NPs. The SERS effect occurred at the metal–semiconductor junction and generated strong local electromagnetic (EM) field at the interface in the hybrid nanosystem [30]. Notably, the physical methods prevent samples from chemical or residual contaminations and provide a large density of Raman hot-spot areas. Our optimized Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs substrate was applied for pesticide detection.

4. Conclusions

To have a simple and fast detection of pesticide residue on fruits or vegetables, a novel material with a cost-effective solution has been proposed. Chemically stable ZrO₂ NFs are prepared by a nonthermal spin-coated sol-gel method, followed by depositing Au NPs and forming as an integrated Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs substrate. The optimized sample Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3 has been proved to be SERS-active with an EF of 2.1 × 10⁷. Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3 is competent to distinguish the characteristic Raman peaks from four kinds of pesticide residue; their detection limits can be lowered to 10⁻⁶–10⁻⁸ M. Besides, Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs show high selectivity to organophosphates when multiple pesticides are present. For a practical application on the diluted juice containing sliced pesticide-containing apple peels, the characteristic peaks of each pesticide could also be clearly identified. Moreover, Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs can be made on a large surface area and are thus promising for flexible and extensible applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/6/402/s1, Figure S1: Supporting Data 1: (a) Low magnification and (b) high magnification of FE-SEM images for the sample AuNPs/ZrO₂NFs_0.3. A uniform Au NPs are deposited onto ZrO₂ NFs. Figure S2: Supporting Data 2: The EDS-mapping image of the cross-sectioned sample AuNPs/ZrO₂NFs_0.3. The green spot is Au element, while the red spot is Zr one. Figure S3: Supporting Data 3: The size distribution histogram of Au NPs on the sample AuNPs/ZrO₂NFs_0.3. To calculate the sizes, random 200 particles on the Supporting Data 1(a) are chosen. Figure 4S: Supporting Data 5: (a) SERS spectra of phosmet standard solutions of various concentrations, and (b) the molecular structure of phosmet. Figure 5S: Supporting Data 6 (a) SERS spectra of carbaryl standard solutions of various concentrations, and (b) the molecular structure of carbaryl. Figure 6S: Supporting Data 7: (a) SERS spectra of permethrin standard solutions of various concentrations, and (b) the molecular structure of permethrin. Figure 7S: Supporting Data 8 (a) SERS spectra of cypermethrin standard solutions of various concentrations, and (b) the molecular structure of cypermethrin. Table S1: Supporting Data 4: Raman spectra of the analytes.

Author Contributions

Han Lee designed the study, analyzed the data, generated the figures and wrote the manuscript. Chih-Chien Chen performed functional experiments and data analysis and generated the figures. Kundan Sivashanmugan, Bernard Haochih Liu, Wei-en Fu and Yung-Der Juang helped in the design of the study. Jiunn-Der Liao designed the study, interpreted results, modified the manuscript. Guo Dung Chen edited the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by (received funding from) the Headquarters of University Advancement at the National Cheng Kung University, which is sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, under grant number D107-F2301 and MOST-103-2221-E-006-067-MY3.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

Pu, H.; Xiao, W.; Sun, D.W. SERS-microfluidic systems: A potential platform for rapid analysis of food contaminants. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 70, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Koesukwiwat, U.; Lehotay, S.J.; Miao, S.; Leepipatpiboon, N. High throughput analysis of 150 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using QuEChERS and low-pressure gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 6692–6703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wu, Q.; Chang, Q.; Wu, C.; Rao, H.; Zeng, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z. Ultrasound-assisted surfactant-enhanced emulsification microextraction for the determination of carbamate pesticides in water samples by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 1773–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cheng, C.; Yan, B.; Wong, S.M.; Li, X.; Zhou, W.; Yu, T.; Fan, H.J. Fabrication and SERS performance of silver-nanoparticle-decorated Si/ZnO nanotrees in ordered arrays. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 1824–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chen, G.; Cao, P.; Liu, R. A multi-residue method for fast determination of pesticides in tea by ultra performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry combined with modified QuEChERS sample preparation procedure. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 1406–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yaseen, T.; Sun, D.W.; Cheng, J.H. Raman imaging for food quality and safety evaluation: Fundamentals and applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 62, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sivashanmugan, K.; Liao, J.D.; Liu, B.H.; Yu, L.C. AuGa₂ on focused Ga ion beam-fabricated Au nanorod array for trace detection of melamine cyanurate in milk solution. Appl. Phys. Express 2014, 8, 017001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sivashanmugan, K.; Liao, J.D.; Liu, B.H.; Yao, C.K. Focused-ion-beam-fabricated Au nanorods coupled with Ag nanoparticles used as surface-enhanced Raman scattering-active substrate for analyzing trace melamine constituents in solution. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 800, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Halvorson, R.A.; Vikesland, P.J. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) for environmental analyses. Environ. Sci. Technol 2010, 44, 7749–7755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Liu, B.; Han, G.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, R.; Jiang, C.; Wang, S.; Han, M.Y. Shell thickness-dependent Raman enhancement for rapid identification and detection of pesticide residues at fruit peels. Anal. Chem. 2011, 84, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Guerrini, L.; Graham, D. Molecularly-mediated assemblies of plasmonic nanoparticles for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7085–7107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lee, A.; Andrade, G.F.; Ahmed, A.; Souza, M.L.; Coombs, N.; Tumarkin, E.; Kumacheva, E. Probing dynamic generation of hot-spots in self-assembled chains of gold nanorods by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7563–7570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sivashanmugan, K.; Liao, J.D.; Liu, B.H.; Yao, C.K.; Luo, S.C. Ag nanoclusters on ZnO nanodome array as hybrid SERS-active substrate for trace detection of malachite green. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2015, 207, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xie, H.N.; Larmour, I.A.; Smith, W.E.; Faulds, K.; Graham, D. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering investigation of hollow gold nanospheres. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012, 116, 8338–8342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Cheng, L.; Lee, S.T.; Liu, Z. Noble metal coated single-walled carbon nanotubes for applications in surface enhanced Raman scattering imaging and photothermal therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 7414–7422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Strelau, K.K.; Schüler, T.; Möller, R.; Fritzsche, W.; Popp, J. Novel Bottom-Up SERS Substrates for Quantitative and Parallelized Analytics. ChemPhysChem. 2010, 11, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Innocenzi, P.; Malfatti, L.; Falcaro, P. Hard X-rays meet soft matter: When bottom-up and top-down get along well. Soft Matter. 2012, 8, 3722–3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Huang, Z.; Meng, G.; Huang, Q.; Chen, B.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, Z. Large-area Ag nanorod array substrates for SERS: AAO template-assisted fabrication, functionalization, and application in detection PCBs. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2013, 44, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wolosiuk, A.; Tognalli, N.G.; Martínez, E.D.; Granada, M.; Fuertes, M.C.; Troiani, H.; Soler-Illia, G.J. Silver nanoparticle-mesoporous oxide nanocomposite thin films: A platform for spatially homogeneous SERS-active substrates with enhanced stability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 5263–5272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jiang, R.; Li, B.; Fang, C.; Wang, J. Metal/Semiconductor Hybrid Nanostructures for Plasmon-Enhanced Applications. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 5274–5309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lee, H.; Yao, C.K.; Liao, J.D.; Shao, P.L.; Thi, M.H.N.; Lin, Y.H.; Juang, Y.D. Annealed thin-film zirconia coating adhered on 316 L stainless steel as a bio-inert indwelling needle. Mater. Des. 2015, 88, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lee, H.; Liao, J.D.; Sivashanmugan, K.; Liu, B.H.; Weng, S.L.; Juang, Y.D.; Yao, C.K. Dual properties of zirconia coated porous titanium for a stiffness enhanced bio-scaffold. Mater. Des. 2017, 132, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tsaboula, A.; Papadakis, E.N.; Vryzas, Z.; Kotopoulou, A.; Kintzikoglou, K.; Papadopoulou-Mourkidou, E. Environmental and human risk hierarchy of pesticides: A prioritization method, based on monitoring, hazard assessment and environmental fate. Environ. Int. 2016, 91, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhou, H.; Xu, S.; Ye, M.; Feng, S.; Pan, C.; Jiang, X.; Zou, H. Zirconium phosphonate-modified porous silicon for highly specific capture of phosphopeptides and MALDI-TOF MS analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 2431–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fan, Y.; Lai, K.; Rasco, B.A.; Huang, Y. Analyses of phosmet residues in apples with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Food Control 2014, 37, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, G.; Lin, Y. Electrochemical Sensor for Organophosphate Pesticides and Nerve Agents Using Zirconia Nanoparticles as Selective Sorbents. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 5894–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, M.; Li, Z. Nano-Composite ZrO₂/Au Film Electrode for Voltammetric Detection of Parathion. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2008, 133, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Abdalla, A.A.; Afify, A.S.; Hasaan, I.E.; Mohamed, A. Studying the Effect of Household-Type Treatment and Processing on the Residues of Ethion and Profenofos Pesticides and on the Contents of Capsaicinoids in Green Chili Pepper Using GC-MS/MS and HPLC. Food Anal. Meth. 2017, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sivashanmugan, K.; Lee, H.; Syu, C.H.; Liu, B.H.C.; Liao, J.D. Nanoplasmonic Au/Ag/Au nanorod arrays as SERS-active substrate for the detection of pesticide residue. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 75, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Siddhanta, S.; Thakur, V.; Narayana, C.; Shivaprasad, S.M. Universal metal-semiconductor hybrid nanostructured SERS substrate for biosensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2012, 4, 5807–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figure 1. (a) Steps for preparing Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs: 1. mixing isopropanol with ZrCl₄; 2. forming ZrO₂ thin film by spin-coating method; 3. forming ZrO₂ NFs by removing solvents; (b) steps for depositing Au NPs upon ZrO₂ NFs by e-beam evaporator; (c) SERS mechanism based on Au NPs deposited upon random ZrO₂ NFs; (d) SERS signals from Au NPs deposited upon ZrO₂ NFs, no Raman signal from the surface of Au NPs upon Si (100) and ZrO₂ NFs without the integration of Au NPs.

Figure 2. XRD patterns of ZrO₂ NFs with different ZrCl₄ concentrations.

Figure 3. SEM micrographs of ZrO₂ NFs with different ZrCl₄ concentrations. Morphologies from the surfaces of NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_X with (a) X = 0.05 (b) X = 0.1, (c) X = 0.2, (d) X = 0.3, (e) X = 0.4, and (f) X = 0.5.

Figure 4. The effect of SERS on Au NPs deposited upon random ZrO₂ NFs with different ZrCl₄ concentrations were evaluated using the molecular probe R6G and different Raman laser wavelengths. (a) and (b) are the intensity and enhancement factor of 633 nm laser; similarly to (c) and (d) with 785 nm laser.

Figure 5. (a) The characteristic SERS peaks for the pesticides P1, C1, P2 and C2 at the concentration of 10⁻³ M; (b) SERS signals from 7 samples (i to vii) for the subsequent mixture of P1, C1, P2 and C2. Their characteristic peaks were identified.

Figure 6. SERS spectra (a) from the pesticide-containing apple peels in comparison with (b) a standard solution.

Table 1. Raman intensity reduction of each pesticide in various mixtures compared to that in standard solutions.

Mixture ^a	Raman Intensity Reduction (%) ^b
Mixture ^a	P1	C1	P2	C2
i	04.0	68.1	-	-
ii	02.5	-	64.7	-
iii	18.9	-	-	39.4
iv	27.2	83.9	60.9	-
v	20.1	82.1	-	49.7
vi	33.6	-	94.3	60.2
vii	25.5	80.4	80.3	70.5

^a The concentration of each pesticide in various mixtures was 10⁻³ M; ^b the Raman intensity reduction was the ratio of Raman intensity of each pesticide in mixtures to that in standard solutions.

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.; Liao, J.-D.; Sivashanmugan, K.; Liu, B.H.; Fu, W.-e.; Chen, C.-C.; Chen, G.D.; Juang, Y.-D. Gold Nanoparticle-Coated ZrO₂-Nanofiber Surface as a SERS-Active Substrate for Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060402

AMA Style

Lee H, Liao J-D, Sivashanmugan K, Liu BH, Fu W-e, Chen C-C, Chen GD, Juang Y-D. Gold Nanoparticle-Coated ZrO₂-Nanofiber Surface as a SERS-Active Substrate for Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue. Nanomaterials. 2018; 8(6):402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060402

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Han, Jiunn-Der Liao, Kundan Sivashanmugan, Bernard Haochih Liu, Wei-en Fu, Chih-Chien Chen, Guo Dung Chen, and Yung-Der Juang. 2018. "Gold Nanoparticle-Coated ZrO₂-Nanofiber Surface as a SERS-Active Substrate for Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue" Nanomaterials 8, no. 6: 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060402

APA Style

Lee, H., Liao, J. -D., Sivashanmugan, K., Liu, B. H., Fu, W. -e., Chen, C. -C., Chen, G. D., & Juang, Y. -D. (2018). Gold Nanoparticle-Coated ZrO₂-Nanofiber Surface as a SERS-Active Substrate for Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue. Nanomaterials, 8(6), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060402

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Gold Nanoparticle-Coated ZrO₂-Nanofiber Surface as a SERS-Active Substrate for Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Fabrication of ZrO₂ NFs and NPs/ZrO₂ NFs

2.2. Structural and Morphological Characterization

2.3. Enhancement Evaluation for the Effect of SERS

2.4. Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue and Those on Apples

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Quality of ZrO₂ NFs and Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs

3.2. The Effect of SERS for the Samples of Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs

3.3. Trace Detection of Pesticides Using the Optimal Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3

3.4. Detection of Simulated Pesticides on Apples

4. Conclusions

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

References

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI

Article Menu

Gold Nanoparticle-Coated ZrO2-Nanofiber Surface as a SERS-Active Substrate for Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Fabrication of ZrO2 NFs and NPs/ZrO2 NFs

2.2. Structural and Morphological Characterization

2.3. Enhancement Evaluation for the Effect of SERS

2.4. Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue and Those on Apples

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Quality of ZrO2 NFs and Au NPs/ZrO2 NFs

3.2. The Effect of SERS for the Samples of Au NPs/ZrO2 NFs

3.3. Trace Detection of Pesticides Using the Optimal Au NPs/ZrO2 NFs_0.3

3.4. Detection of Simulated Pesticides on Apples

4. Conclusions

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

References

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI

Gold Nanoparticle-Coated ZrO₂-Nanofiber Surface as a SERS-Active Substrate for Trace Detection of Pesticide Residue

2.1. Fabrication of ZrO₂ NFs and NPs/ZrO₂ NFs

3.1. The Quality of ZrO₂ NFs and Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs

3.2. The Effect of SERS for the Samples of Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs

3.3. Trace Detection of Pesticides Using the Optimal Au NPs/ZrO₂ NFs_0.3