Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Next Article in Journal
Δ-Convergence of Products of Operators in p-Uniformly Convex Metric Spaces
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Aα-Spectral Radii of Cactus Graphs
Previous Article in Journal
Nondifferentiable Multiobjective Programming Problem under Strongly K-Gf-Pseudoinvexity Assumptions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wiener Index of Edge Thorny Graphs of Catacondensed Benzenoids
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Properties of Entropy-Based Topological Measures of Fullerenes

by
Modjtaba Ghorbani
1,*,
Matthias Dehmer
2,* and
Frank Emmert-Streib
3,4
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Lavizan, Tehran 16785-163, Iran
2
Department of Computer Science, Swiss Distance University of Applied Sciences, 3900 Brig, Switzerland
3
Predictive Society and Data Analytics Lab, Tampere University, Tampere, Korkeakoulunkatu 10, 33720 Tampere, Finland
4
Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Korkeakoulunkatu 10, 33720 Tampere, Finland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2020, 8(5), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050740
Submission received: 8 April 2020 / Revised: 19 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 April 2020 / Published: 7 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Graph Theory at Work in Carbon Chemistry)
Figure 1
<p>Illustration of two cubic graphs: (<b>a</b>) Cuneane; (<b>b</b>) cube.</p> ">
Figure 2
<p>The 2-D graph of zig-zag nanotube <span class="html-italic">T<sub>Z</sub></span>[5,10].</p> ">
Figure 3
<p>Cap <span class="html-italic">B</span>.</p> ">
Figure 4
<p>The presentation of fullerene A<sub>10<span class="html-italic">n</span></sub> as a combining of two copies of <span class="html-italic">B</span> and the nanotube <span class="html-italic">T<sub>Z</sub></span>[5,<span class="html-italic">n −</span> 4].</p> ">
Figure 5
<p>Three-dimensional graph of zig-zag polyhex nanotori.</p> ">
Figure 6
<p>Two-dimensional lattice for <span class="html-italic">T</span>[<span class="html-italic">p,q</span>].</p> ">
Figure 7
<p>The molecular graph of the fullerene C<sub>24<span class="html-italic">n</span>+12</sub>, for <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3.</p> ">
Figure 8
<p>The molecular graph of the fullerene C<sub>12<span class="html-italic">n</span>+2</sub>.</p> ">
Figure 9
<p>Two vertices with the same total distance which are not <span class="html-italic">H</span>-equivalent.</p> ">
Figure 10
<p>The vertices <span class="html-italic">u</span> and <span class="html-italic">v</span> are not <span class="html-italic">H</span>-equivalent but <span class="html-italic">D</span>(<span class="html-italic">u</span>) = <span class="html-italic">D</span>(<span class="html-italic">v</span>).</p> ">
Figure 11
<p>A cubic co-distance graph of diameter 4 with non-zero <span class="html-italic">H</span>-entropy.</p> ">
Figure 12
<p>The fullerene A<sub>12<span class="html-italic">n</span>+4</sub>.</p> ">
Figure 13
<p>The orbits of the <span class="html-italic">i</span>th layer (2 ≤ <span class="html-italic">i</span> ≤ <span class="html-italic">n</span>)of the fullerene graph A<sub>12<span class="html-italic">n</span>+4</sub>.</p> ">
Figure 14
<p>The subgraph <span class="html-italic">B</span><sub>1</sub>.</p> ">
Figure 15
<p>The subgraph <span class="html-italic">B</span><sub>2</sub>.</p> ">
Figure 16
<p>The 3-dimensional structure of fullerene graph A<sub>12<span class="html-italic">n</span>+4</sub>.</p> ">
Figure 17
<p>The Hosoya-partitions of <span class="html-italic">Tz</span>[6,<span class="html-italic">n</span> − 10].</p> ">
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A fullerene is a cubic three-connected graph whose faces are entirely composed of pentagons and hexagons. Entropy applied to graphs is one of the significant approaches to measuring the complexity of relational structures. Recently, the research on complex networks has received great attention, because many complex systems can be modelled as networks consisting of components as well as relations among these components. Information—theoretic measures have been used to analyze chemical structures possessing bond types and hetero-atoms. In the present article, we reviewed various entropy-based measures on fullerene graphs. In particular, we surveyed results on the topological information content of a graph, namely the orbit-entropy Ia(G), the symmetry index, a degree-based entropy measure Iλ(G), the eccentric-entropy Ifσ(G) and the Hosoya entropy H(G).

1. Introduction

In recent years, research on complex networks has been essential since many complex systems are modelled as networks consisting of components as well as relations among these components. Some studies focused on finding properties of real networks, such as degree distribution [1,2], degree correlation [3,4,5], and degree-based structure entropies [6,7]. Many significant properties of systems such as heterogeneity [1], assortative mixing [8,9], and self-similarity [10,11,12] are based on these statistics.
Entropy applied to graphs is one of two major approaches to measuring the complexity of relational structures. The origin of such measures goes back to Rashevsky who introduced the concept of topological information content; see [13]. Studies of graph complexity have been performed in many areas [8,11,14,15], such as chemistry to labeled chemical structures possessing bond types and hetero-atoms; see [16]. The aim of this paper was to review some selected entropy-based measures.

2. Definitions and Preliminaries

Here, we recall the definition of the automorphism group of a graph. It is a well-known fact that in a regular polyhedral graph such as a fullerene, the symmetry group and the automorphism group are the same; see [17]. A permutation π on the set of vertices of graph G, which preserves the adjacency of vertices of G, is called an automorphism. In other words, the permutation π is an automorphism if
u v E ( G ) π ( u ) π ( v ) E ( G ) .
The set of all automorphisms of G, denoted by Aut ( G ) , forms a group under the composition of mappings called an automorphism group. Let the automorphism group Aut (G) act on vertex set V. This action yields an automorphism partition P = {V1, V2,..., Vk} in the which two vertices x and y are equivalent if and only if there exists g in Aut (G) such that xg = y. Each member of P is an orbit of Aut (G). The set of orbits of a graph enables us to investigate the heterogeneity of networks.
We say that Aut (G) acts transitively on the set of vertices, if for u , v V ( G ) , there is an automorphism β Aut ( G ) , such that β ( u ) = v . In this case, we say that G is vertex-transitive. It is not difficult to see that every vertex-transitive graph has only one orbit whose size is equal to the number of vertices. For example, consider the rotation ρ = ( 360 / n ) of cycle graph Cn; then, the corresponding permutation is ρ = ( 1 , 2 , , n ) which yields that Cn is vertex-transitive.
Measuring the heterogeneity of complex networks has been important in studies of the behaviour of complex networks. For example, existing heterogeneity measures [6,7] of complex networks are based on degree. Specifically, entropies in [6,7] are based on degree distribution [8,9]. As is shown in Figure 1, in a network, vertices with the same degree can be distinguished by measurement on some structural properties of particular vertex such as the number of triangles that a vertex lie on or the shortest path passing through a vertex; see Figure 1.
The molecular graph of cuneane is depicted in Figure 1a. This graph is not vertex-transitive. The 2-D graph of the cube graph Q3, as depicted in Figure 1b, indicates an example of a vertex-transitive graph. One can easily verify that the vertex partition P = {{1, 8}, {4, 5}, {2, 3, 6, 7}} in the cuneane graph is finer than the degree partition. Furthermore, we can validate that partition P is an orbit decomposition of cuneane.
For most of networks, the orbit-partition of a graph is much finer than the degree partition. The number of automorphism partitions or the number of orbits can interpret the structure of a network. For example, a graph with n vertices has exactly n orbits if and only if it is asymmetric.

3. Fullerene Graphs

In addition to the two popular forms of carbon, namely diamond and graphite, a third form of carbon called fullerene was discovered in 1985; see [18,19]. One of the most well-known members of this class of molecular graphs, the buckminster fullerene C60 which contains 60 carbon atoms, 12 pentagons and 20 hexagons, is vertex-transitive.
In general, a fullerene is a cubic three-connected graph on n vertices which has n/2 - 10 hexagons and 12 pentagons.
The non-classical fullerenes are formed by a combination of triangles, quadrangles, pentagons, hexagons, etc. There are many problems concerning fullerene graphs, and many properties of them were studied by mathematicians, see [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64] as well as [65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]. Fullerenes are individual cases of a larger class of graphs, namely polyhedral graphs. In general, a polyhedral graph is a three-connected simple planar graph and the polyhedral graphs considered in this paper are cubic. In chemistry, a fullerene is a molecule composed of carbon atoms in the form of many shapes such as a hollow sphere, ellipsoid, tube, etc. [51]. The non-classical fullerenes may contain hexagons and other rings.
In [76], a method is described to obtain a fullerene graph from a zig-zag or armchair nanotubes. Here, by continuing that method, we construct some infinite classes of fullerenes. Denoted by TZ[m,n] means a zig-zag nanotube with m rows and n columns of hexagons, see Figure 2. Combine a nanotube TZ[5,n − 4] with two copies of caps B (Figure 3), to construct a fullerene graph as shown in Figure 4. Two caps have together 40 vertices and thus, the number of vertices of the fullerene graph is 10(n − 4) + 40 = 10n. This is why we did it by A10n.

4. Entropy Measure

The concepts of entropies have been investigated extensively in [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84] to characterize and quantify the structure of networks. Several types of them are discussed in [1], and mathematically explored. Therefore, we omit an extensive review on graph entropies here. Studying the entropy of dendrimers, a graph class with a long-standing history in chemistry and related disciplines, is done in some references such as [82,83,84] in which authors considered the individual eccentricity-based information functionals. As graph entropies, we use a specific definition due to Dehmer [85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92] as follows. Consider a probability vector p = (p1,…,pn) that satisfies in two conditions 0 ≤ pi ≤ 1 and i = 1 n p i = 1 . The Shannon’s entropy is I ( p ) = i = 1 n p i log p i , where the symbol “log” is the logarithm on the basis 2. Let
p i = λ i / j = 1 n λ j , ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) ,
where ( λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ n ) is a tuple of none-negative integers, λ i , see [90]. The entropy of tuple ( λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ n ) is given by
I ( λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ n ) = log ( i = 1 n λ i ) i = 1 n ( λ i / j = 1 n λ j ) log λ i .
There are many ways to obtain the tuple ( λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ n ) .
For a vertex vi of graph G, if we put
p ( v i ) : = f ( v i ) / j = 1 | V | f ( v j ) ,
Then clearly, j = 1 | V | p ( v j ) = 1 and the entropy measure of G based on f is thus
I f ( G ) = i = 1 | V | f ( v i ) j = 1 | V | f ( v j ) log ( f ( v i ) / j = 1 | V | f ( v j ) ) = log ( i = 1 | V | f ( v i ) ) i = 1 | V | ( f ( v i ) / j = 1 | V | f ( v j ) ) log f ( v i ) .
In the literature, there are various ways to obtain the tuple (p1,…,pn) like the so-called magnitude-based information measures introduced by Bonchev and Trinajstić [82], or partition—independent graph entropies, introduced by Dehmer based on information functionals; see [91,92,93,94,95,96] as well as [97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106].
A function d : G × G + in which for any pair of vertices of graph G such as x and y, d(x,y) is defined as the length of shortest path connecting them, indicates the distance between these vertices.
A topological index of graph G is a numerical quantity, which is invariant under its automorphism group. The Wiener index is the first reported distance based topological index, and it defined as half sum of the distances between all the pairs of vertices in a molecular graph; see [107]. In other words,
W ( G ) = 1 2 x , y V ( G ) d ( x , y ) .
The Wiener (or Hosoya) polynomial of a graph [108] is defined as
H ( G ,   x ) = u v E ( G ) x d ( u , v ) .
It is clear that H(G,1) = W(G). For a given vertex v, the function
H v ( G , x ) = u V ( G ) , u v x d ( u , v )
is called the partial Hosoya polynomial of G at vertex v.
Hence,
H ( G , x ) = v V ( G ) H v ( G , x )
Graph entropy measures represent information—theoretic measures for characterizing networks quantitatively. The first concepts in this framework was developed in the 1950s for investigating biological and chemical systems. Seminal work on this problem was done by Rashevsky, Trucco, and Mowshowitz, [100,101,102,103,104,109,110,111,112] who studied entropy measures for determining the structural information content of a graph. Graph entropies have been applied to various problems such as biology, computational biology, mathematical chemistry, Web mining, and knowledge engineering.

4.1. Eccentric Entropy Measure

The eccentricity of vertex v is an information functional defined by σ ( v ) = max u V d ( u , v ) , see [113,114,115]. Now, for a vertex v i V f(vi):= ciσ(vi), where ci > 0 for 1 ≤ in. Then
I f σ ( G ) = log ( i = 1 n c i σ ( v i ) ) i = 1 n c i σ ( v i ) j = 1 n c j σ ( v j ) log ( c i σ ( v i ) ) .
Moreover, if cis are equal, then
I f σ ( G ) = log ( i = 1 n σ ( v i ) ) i = 1 n σ ( v i ) j = 1 n σ ( v j ) log ( σ ( v i ) ) .
Theorem 1
([25]). In a vertex-transitive graph, all vertices have the same eccentricity.
Theorem 2.
If G is a regular graph on n vertices, then
I f σ ( G ) = log ( i = 1 n c i ) i = 1 n c i j = 1 n c j log ( c i ) .
In particular, if ci = cj for all, i ≠ j then Ifσ(G) = log(n).
Proof. 
By Theorem 1, for all x , y V ( G ) , we have σ(x) = σ(y) which proves the first claim.
If ci = cj for all ij then we have
I f σ ( G ) = log ( n c 1 ) 1 n c 1 i = 1 n c 1 log ( c 1 ) = log ( n c 1 ) log ( c 1 ) = log ( n ) .
 □
Theorem 3.
The polyhex nanotori T (Figure 5) is vertex-transitive.
Proof. 
Suppose p and q are even. Consider two vertices uij and urs in which both integers i,r are either odd, or even, and suppose σ, π are two permutations that σ(uit) = urt, 1 ≤ t ≤ p and π(utj) = uts, 1 ≤ t ≤ q. Then, σ and π are automorphisms of T in which πσ maps uij to urs and so, they are in the same orbit. Suppose now i is odd and r is even or i is even and r is odd. Then, the permutation θ which maps uij to u(p+1−i)j is a graph automorphism which implies that uij and urs are in the same orbit of Aut(G) and we are done. □
Example 1.
Consider the 2-dimensional graph of zig-zag polyhex nanotori T[p,q], as depicted in Figure 6. It can be easily seen that |V(T[p,q])|=pq. By Theorem 3, T[p,q] is vertex-transitive and if for all i≠j, ci=cj then, by Theorem 2, we have I f σ ( T [ p , q ] ) = log ( n ) = log ( p ) + log ( q ) .
Let G be an edge-transitive graph but not vertex-transitive, and e = xy be an arbitrary edge in G. For an arbitrary edge e = uv, there exists an automorphism σ such that σ(e) = f. Hence, { σ ( u ) , σ ( v ) } = { σ ( x ) , σ ( y ) } . Let σ ( v i ) = σ ( x ) for 1 ≤ ir and σ ( v j ) = σ ( y ) for r + 1 j n . As a particular case, we consider ci = cj for all ij. By some elementary calculations, we obtain
I f σ ( G ) = log ( r σ ( x ) + ( n r ) σ ( y ) ) r σ ( x ) log ( σ ( x ) ) + ( n r ) σ ( y ) log ( σ ( y ) ) r σ ( x ) + ( n r ) σ ( y ) .
Hence, we proved the following theorem.
Theorem 4.
Let G be edge-transitive but not vertex-transitive and let ci = cj for all ij. Then,
I f σ ( G ) = log ( r σ ( x ) + ( n r ) σ ( y ) ) r σ ( x ) log ( σ ( x ) ) + ( n r ) σ ( y ) log ( σ ( y ) ) r σ ( x ) + ( n r ) σ ( y ) .
Example 2.
As usual, suppose that Sn indicates an star graph on n + 1 vertices. Suppose x is the central vertex and denotes the other vertices by u 1 , u 2 , , u n . Then d(x,u1) = 1 and d(ui,uj) = 2 (1 ≤ i,j ≤ n). If ci = cj for all i≠j, then, by using Theorem 4, we infer that
I f σ ( S n ) = log ( 2 ( n 1 ) + 1 ) 2 ( n 1 ) log 2 + log 1 2 n 1 = log ( 2 n 1 ) + 1 2 n 1 1 .
Theorem 5.
Suppose G is a graph and V1, …, Vk are all orbits of Aut(G) on V(G). Then,
I f σ ( G ) = log ( i = 1 k σ ( x i ) j = 1 | V i | c j ) i = 1 k σ ( x i ) j = 1 | V i | c j t = 1 k σ ( x t ) l = 1 | V i | c l log ( c j σ ( x i ) ) .
Proof. 
For all x i , x j V i , we have σ ( x i ) = σ ( x j ) and, the proof is complete. □
Suppose for the vertex v of graph G, d(v) shows the degree of vertex v. If f ( v ) { σ ( v ) , d ( v ) , d ( v ) σ ( v ) , σ ( v ) d ( v ) , d ( v ) σ ( v ) } , and we put f(v) in Equation (1), then we achieve four new entropy-based measures as follows:
I deg ( G ) = log ( i = 1 n d ( v i ) ) i = 1 n d ( v i ) j = 1 n d ( v j ) log ( d ( v i ) j = 1 n d ( v j ) ) .
I ξ ( G ) = log ( i = 1 n d ( v i ) σ ( v i ) ) i = 1 n d ( v i ) σ ( v i ) j = 1 n d ( v j ) σ ( v j ) log ( d ( v i ) σ ( v i ) j = 1 n d ( v j ) σ ( v j ) ) .
I ξ D ( G ) = log ( i = 1 n d ( v i ) σ ( v i ) ) i = 1 n d ( v i ) / σ ( v i ) j = 1 n d ( v j ) / σ ( v j ) log ( d ( v i ) / σ ( v i ) j = 1 n d ( v j ) / σ ( v j ) ) .
I ξ D ( G ) = log ( i = 1 n σ ( v i ) d ( v i ) ) i = 1 n σ ( v i ) / d ( v i ) j = 1 n σ ( v j ) / d ( v j ) log ( σ ( v i ) / d ( v i ) j = 1 n σ ( v j ) / d ( v j ) ) .
It is clear that since a fullerene is 3-regular, then m = 3n/2 (the number of edges) and
I deg ( G ) = log ( 2 m ) 1 2 m i = 1 n d ( v i ) log ( d ( v i ) ) , = log ( 3 n ) 1 3 n i = 1 n d ( v i ) log ( d ( v i ) ) .
Moreover, the entropies of graphs based on the eccentricities of vertices are studied in [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].

4.2. Ecc-Entropy of Fullerene Graphs

In this section, similarly to the definition of the fullerene A10n in the last section, we present two infinite families of fullerenes namely C24n+12 and C12n+2 with respectively 24n + 12 and 12n + 2 vertices as depicted, respectively, in Figure 7 and Figure 8. For more details about the construction of these classes of fullerenes, see references [25,27].
Theorem 6.
If ci’s are equal, then Equation (5) yields that for n ≥ 7
I f σ ( C 24 n + 12 ) = 2 + log 3 + log ( 3 n 2 + 12 n + 5 ) 1 3 n 2 + 12 n + 5 ( ( n + 5 ) log ( n + 5 ) + 2 i = 6 n + 5 ( n + i ) log ( n + i ) ) .
Proof. 
Consider the vertices of the central hexagon and other vertices of C24n+12 as shown in Figure 7. Consider the eccentric contribution of each vertex as reported in Table 1. As shown in this table, there are two types of vertices. The vertices of the central and outer hexagons and the other vertices. By Equation (2) we have
I f σ ( C 24 n + 12 ) = log ( 12 ( n + 5 ) + 24 i = 6 n + 5 ( n + i ) ) 1 12 ( n + 5 ) + 24 i = 6 n + 5 ( n + i ) ( 12 ( n + 5 ) log ( n + 5 ) + 24 i = 6 n + 5 ( n + i ) log ( n + i ) ) = 2 + log 3 + log ( 3 n 2 + 12 n + 5 ) 1 3 n 2 + 12 n + 5 ( ( n + 5 ) log ( n + 5 ) + 2 i = 6 n + 5 ( n + i ) log ( n + i ) )
 □
The exceptional cases are given in Table 2.
Theorem 7.
If ci’s are equal, then the entropy of fullerene C12n+2, n ≥ 10 (see Figure 8) is
I f σ ( C 12 n + 2 ) = 1 + log ( n ) + log ( 9 n + 14 ) 1 n ( 9 n + 14 ) ( 8 n + 11 n log ( n ) + 6 i = 1 n ( n + i ) log ( n + i ) )
Proof. 
Similarly, to the proof of Theorem 6 and by using the eccentricity of vertices as reported in Table 3 and by Equation (5), we obtain
I f σ ( C 12 n + 2 ) = log ( 22 n + 12 i = 1 n ( n + i ) ) 1 22 n + 12 i = 1 n ( n + i ) ( 16 n log ( 2 n ) + 6 n log ( n ) + 12 i = 1 n ( n + i ) log ( n + i ) ) = 1 + log ( 9 n 2 + 14 n ) 1 n ( 9 n + 14 ) ( 8 n + 11 n log ( n ) + 6 i = 1 n ( n + i ) log ( n + i ) ) .
 □
The exceptional cases are given in Table 4.

4.3. Eigen—Entropy of Fullerenes

The adjacency matrix A(G) of graph G with vertex set V(G) = {v1, v2,..., vn} is the n × n symmetric matrix [aij ] such that aij = 1 if vi and vj are adjacent and 0, otherwise. The characteristic polynomial of graph G is defined as [116]
ϕ(G,x) = det(A(G) – xI)
The roots of the characteristic polynomial are named the eigenvalues of graph G, which form the spectrum of this graph. If α is an eigenvalue of matrix A, then there exists a vector such as V, in which A.V = αV.
Let λ1,..., λn be the eigenvalues of A(G); then, the energy of G is defined [117,118] as
ε ( G ) = i = 1 n | λ i |
In theoretical chemistry, the energy is a graph parameter stemming from the Hückel molecular orbital approximation for the total π-electron energy. Thus, the graph energy has some specific chemical interests and has been extensively studied [119,120].
One information functional is based on absolute value of eigenvalues; see [121,122]. The eigen-entropy based on non-zero eigenvalues denoted by Ifλ(G) is defined as follows:
I f λ ( G ) = log ( i = 1 n c i | λ i | ) i = 1 n c i | λ i | j = 1 n c j | λ j | log ( c i | λ i | )
where λ i 0 ( i = 1 , , n 1 ) . If cis are equal, then
I f λ ( G ) = log ( i = 1 n | λ i | ) i = 1 n | λ i | j = 1 n | λ j | log ( | λ i | ) = log ( ε ( G ) ) 1 ε ( G ) i = 1 n | λ i | log ( | λ i | ) .
Theorem 8.
Let G be a connected graph with non-zero eigenvalues λ i 0 ( i = 1 , , n 1 ) . Then
log ( 2 m ) ) 2 m ε ( G ) I λ ( G ) log ( 2 m ) ) α 2 s ε ( G ) ,
where α = min { | λ i | : i = 1 , , s } and where s is the number of distinct eigenvalues.
Proof. 
It is a well-known fact that ε ( G ) 2 m . By using Equation (6), we have
I λ ( G ) log ( 2 m ) 1 2 m ( i = 1 s | λ i | log ( | λ i | ) ) .
Since logarithm is an increasing function, we have log | λ i | | λ i | . On the other hand, i = 1 s λ i 2 = 2 m yields
log ( 2 m ) ) 2 m ε ( G ) I λ ( G ) log ( 2 m ) ) α 2 s ε ( G )
Now, 2 m ε ( G ) 2 m implies that
log ( 2 m ) ) 2 m ε ( G ) I λ ( G ) log ( 2 m ) ) i = 1 s ( log | λ i | ) 2 ε ( G )
Let α = min { | λ i | : i = 1 , , s } . The nullity of G is 1. By reformulating Equation (7), one can see that
log ( 2 m ) ) 2 m ε ( G ) I λ ( G ) log ( 2 m ) ) α 2 s ε ( G ) .
 □
Theorem 9.
Let G be a graph whose eigenvalues are in the interval [−1,1]. Then
I λ ( G ) ε ( G )
Proof. 
Clearly, we obtain
I λ ( G ) = log ( ε ( G ) ) 1 ε ( G ) i = 1 , λ 0 n | λ i | log | λ i | = log ( ε ( G ) ) 1 ε ( G ) i = 1 , λ 0 n log | λ i | | λ i | = log ( ε ( G ) ) 1 ε ( G ) log ( Π | λ i | | λ i | ) .
On the other hand, Π | λ i | | λ i | Π λ 1 | λ i | = λ 1 ε ( G ) . So
I λ ( G ) log ( ε ( G ) ) log ( λ 1 ) = log ( ε ( G ) λ 1 ) ,
Since λ i [ 1 , 1 ] , thus I λ ( G ) ε ( G ) . □
Theorem 10.
Let G be a graph and m(G) be the -th spectral moment of G. Then
I λ ( G ) ε ( G ) m Δ ( G ) ε ( G ) .
Proof. 
We have i = 1 n | λ i | log | λ i | i = 1 n log | λ i | | λ i | i = 1 n log | λ i | Δ i = 1 n | λ i | Δ = m Δ ( G ) .
Thus
I λ ( G ) ε ( G ) m Δ ( G ) ε ( G ) .

4.4. The Hosoya Entropy of Fullerenes

Here, we introduce the Hosoya entropy based on the distance between vertices of a graph, see [123,124,125]. Given a graph G and two vertices u and v, the distance between them is defined as the length of the shortest path connecting them. Let si(u) be the number of vertices at distance i from vertex u. Then the sequence dds(v) = (s0(v), s1(v),…, sd(v)) is called the distance degree sequence of v.
Two vertices u and v are H-equivalent if dds(u) = dds(v) see [126] and the class of H -equivalent vertices constitutes the H-partitions of a graph.
Suppose G has h H-equivalent classes and the cardinality of ith H-equivalent class is ni (1 ≤ ih). Then, H-entropy of G [127] is
H ( G ) = i = 1 h h i log ( h i )
where h i = n i / | V | .
Let also O1,…, Ol be all the orbits of Aut(G) in the set of vertices. If li is the cardinality of the i-th orbit for 1 ≤ il, then the orbit entropy of G [116,117,118,119] is given by
I a ( G ) = i = 1 l μ i log ( μ i )
where μ i = | n i | / | V | .
The value of H(G) for a graph G with n vertices is between zero and log(n). The minimum is achieved when all the vertices are H-equivalent; the maximum is reached when a non-pair of vertices are H-equivalent. Complete graphs and cycles have a H-entropy of 0.
Remark 1.
In a vertex-transitive graph, all the vertices are H-equivalent and the H-entropy is zero. The converse of this fact is not true. In other words, there are many examples of non-vertex-transitive graphs with zero H-entropy.
Theorem 11.
Two vertices in the same orbit are H-equivalent. In addition, the H-entropy of a vertex-transitive graph is zero [128].
Although two similar vertices are H-equivalent, the converse is not true. For example, in Figure 9, u and v are H-equivalent, and thus D(u) = D(v), while they are in different orbits. Moreover, two vertices u and v in Figure 10 are not H-equivalent but D(u) = D(v).
Theorem 12
([128]). If G is a regular graph with diameter ρ = 2, then H(G) = 0.
Theorem 13.
If G is a regular graph with non-zero H-entropy, then its diameter is greater than 2.
Theorem 14
([128]). If G is a connected graph on n vertices, then H(G) = n if and only if Aut(G) is trivial.
Theorem 15
([128]). The H-entropy of a regular graph of degree greater than n/2 is zero.
Theorem 16
([128]). The H-entropy of a regular graph of degree greater than or equal with n/2 is zero, if the number of vertices is an even number and G is edge-transitive.
Theorem 17
([128]). If G is a graph on at least five vertices which is edge-transitive but not bipartite, and each vertex has odd degree. Then, H-entropy is zero.
In continuing, we compute the H-entropy of graphs with at most two orbits.
Definition 1.
A graph G is called co-distance, if for each pair of vertices (u,v) their total distances are the same, namely D(u) = D(v).
Each vertex-transitive graph is co-distance, but there are examples of co-distance non-transitive graphs. The graph G in Figure 11 has two orbits V1 = {1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 12} and V2 = {3, 10, 4, 7, 11, 9}. It is not difficult to see that d(G) = 4 and D(1) = D(3) while the H-entropy is not zero.
Theorem 18
([128]). Up to isomorphism there are exactly 14 co-distance regular graphs of order at most 14 with two orbits and diameter greater than or equal with 3. Among them, only the graph G depicted in Figure 11 has non-zero H-entropy.
Theorem 19
([128]). Suppose the H-entropy of graph G is zero. Then nor G is a tree or a regular graph.
Theorem 20
([128]). Suppose G is a graph with two orbits V1 and V2 and non-zero H-entropy. Then H(G) = 1 if and only if n is even and |V1| = |V2| = n/2.
Theorem 21
([128]). Let G be a regular graph with two orbits and diameter less than four. If G is co-distance, then its H-entropy is zero.
In the final part of this section, we compute the H-entropy of some infinite classes of fullerene graphs.
Theorem 22.
The fullerene graph A12n + 4 where n ≥ 4 satisfies
H ( A 12 n + 4 ) = log ( 12 n + 4 ) 1 12 n + 4 ( ( 12 n + 3 ) log 3 + 6 ( 2 n 4 ) ) .
Proof. 
In Figure 12, the vertices of ith (i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) layer are in the same orbit. The vertices of the layers 6, 7,…, n constitute three orbits labeled by the numbers 1, 2, and 3. Vertices with labels 2, 3 are in the same H-equivalent partition and the other vertices compose the H-equivalent partition. Finally, the vertices of the outer pentagon are H-equivalent. In other words, there are an equivalence class of size 1, nine equivalence classes of size 3, and 2n − 4 equivalence classes of size 6 which yield
H ( A 12 n + 4 ) = 1 12 n + 4 log ( 12 n + 4 ) + 27 12 n + 4 log ( 12 n + 4 3 ) + 6 ( 2 n 4 ) 12 n + 4 log ( 12 n + 4 6 ) = log ( 12 n + 4 ) ( 27 12 n + 4 log 3 + 6 ( 2 n 4 ) 12 n + 4 ( 1 + log 3 ) ) = log ( 12 n + 4 ) 1 12 n + 4 ( ( 12 n 24 ) + ( 12 n + 3 ) log 3 ) .
 □
Similarly to the structure of A10n in last section, the fullerene graph A12n+4 is composed of a nanotube Tz[6, n − 10] together with two caps B1 and B2, see Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16. Thus, the vertices of A12n+4 are labeled as given in Figure 17. The H-partitions and the eccentricity of vertices of caps B1 and B2 are given in Table 5.

4.5. Radial Entropy and Orbit Measures

In a network, knowing, for example, the degree of vertices gives us essential information about the number of interconnections of each component. These data provide a narrow understanding of complex networks, because the vertex partition [12] based on degree is coarser than automorphism partition. Hence, it is important to know if we substitute the degree partitions instead of orbit partitions; then, the study of complex network in the view of symmetry leads us to understand more about the structure of the regarding graph. The orbit entropy is defined as
I a ( G ) = i = 1 k | O i | | V | log ( | O i | | V | )
where Oi’s (1 ≤ ik) are orbits of G. Regarding the orbit polynomial, the symmetry index S(G) is defined [127] as follows:
S ( G ) = log ( n ) I a ( G ) + log ( | Aut ( G ) | ) .
Suppose N i j , 1 ≤ jk is the collection of all vertices with eccentricity ij. Then, the radial entropy is defined by
H e c c ( G ) = i = 1 k | N i | | V | log ( | N i | | V | ) .
Let p1,..., pn−10 be the H-equivalent classes of Tz[6,n − 10] which contains the vertices with label i. Then ecc(pi) = 2n − i-9. Thus, the eccentricity sequence of fullerene graph A12n+4 is
{ ( 2 n i ) 12 ( 1 i n 1 ) , ( 2 n ) 9 , ( 2 n + 1 ) 7 } .
Theorem 23
([129]). Consider the fullerene graph A12n+4, where n ≥ 4. If n is even, then
I a ( A 12 n + 4 ) = log   ( 12 n + 4 ) 1 12 n + 4 ( ( 12 n + 3 ) log 3 + 6 n ) .
If n is odd, then
I a ( A 12 n + 4 ) = log ( 12 n + 4 ) 1 12 n + 4 ( ( 12 n + 3 ) log 3 + 6 n + 6 ) .
Theorem 24
([129]). The radial entropy of fullerene A12n + 4 (n ≥ 4) is
H e c c ( A 12 n + 4 ) = log ( 12 n + 4 ) 1 12 n + 4 ( 24 ( n 1 ) + ( 12 n + 6 ) log 3 + 7 log 7 ) .
Theorem 25
([129]). If the ci’s are equal, the entropy of fullerene A12n + 4 (n ≥ 11) is given by
I f σ ( A 12 n + 4 ) = log ( 18 n 2 + 14 n + 7 ) 1 18 n 2 + 14 n + 7 ( ( 14 n + 7 ) log ( 2 n + 1 ) ) + 18 n log   ( 2 n ) + 12 A ,
where A = i = 1 n 1 ( 2 n i ) log ( 2 n i ) .
Theorem 26
([129]). The degree-based entropy of fullerene graph A12n + 4 is
D ( A 12 n + 4 ) = log ( 36 n + 12 ) ( 36 n + 12 ) log 3 36 n + 12 = log ( 12 n + 4 ) .

5. Correlation Analysis

The Pearson correlations between all entropies introduced in this paper are given in Equation (1), for fullerene graph A12n+4.
I f σ H   D I a H e c c I f σ H D I a H e c c ( 0.999871662 1 0.99999826 0.999988517 0.999872017 0.999899809 0.999936954 0.999998301 0.999988624 0.999995717 )
Moreover, the exact values of energy and five entropies for fullerene graph A12n+4 (11 ≤ n ≤ 20) is reported in Table 6. These results show that the correlation between energy and each entropy measure of A12n+4 is greater than 0.99 (see Table 7). It can be found that they release the same structural information about regarding fullerene. In [129], the authors found a similar result for a different class of fullerenes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, formal analysis, project administration M.G. and M.D.; methodology, software, F.E.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Modjtaba Ghorbani is partially supported by the Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University. Also, Matthias Dehmer thanks the Austrian Science Funds for supporting this work (project P30031).

Acknowledgments

This research is partially supported by Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University. Matthias Dehmer thanks the Austrian Science Fund for supporting this work (P 30031).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Albert, R.; Jeong, H.; Barabási, A.L. Diameter of the world wide web. Nature 1999, 401, 130–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Albert, R.; Barabási, A.L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2002, 74, 47–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Strogatz, S.H. Exploring complex networks. Nature 2001, 410, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Barabási, A.-L.; Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999, 286, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Albert, R.; Jeong, H.; Barabási, A.-L. Error and attack tolerance in complex networks. Nature 2000, 406, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Goh, K.-I.; Kahng, B.; Kim, D. Universal behavior of load distribution in Scale-Free Networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 278701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pastor-Satorras, R.; Vázquez, A.; Vespignani, A. Dynamical and Correlation Properties of the Internet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 258701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Maslov, S.; Sneppen, K. Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science 2002, 296, 910–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Berg, J.; Lassig, M. Correlated random networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 228701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Solé, R.V.; Alverde, S.V. Information theory of complex networks: On evolution and architectural constraintsLect. Notes Phys. 2004, 650, 189–207. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, B.; Tang, H.W.; Guo, C.H.; Xiu, Z.L. Entropy Optimization of Scale-Free Networks Robustness to Random Failures. Physica A 2005, 363, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Batagelj, V.; Mrvar, A. A program for large network analysis. Connections 1998, 21, 47–57. [Google Scholar]
  13. Holme, P.; Huss, M. Role-similarity based functional prediction in networked systems: Application to the yeast proteome. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 2005, 2, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Newman, M.E.J. Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 208701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tinhofer, G.; Klin, M. Algebraic Combinatorics in Mathematical Chemistry; Methods and algorithms. III, Graph Invariants and Stabilization Methods (Preliminary Version) Technical Report; TUM-M9902; Technische Universitat Munchen: München, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  16. Costa, L.D.F.; Rodrigues, F.A. Seeking for Simplicity in Complex Networks. arXiv 2009, arXiv:Physics /0702102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fowler, P.W.; Manolopoulos, D.E.; Redmond, D.B.; Ryan, R.P. Possible symmetries of fullerene stuctures. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 202, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kroto, H.W.; Heath, J.R.; O’Brien, S.C.; Curl, R.F.; Smalley, R.E. C60: Buckminsterfullerene. Nature 1985, 318, 162–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kroto, H.W. The stability of the fullerenes Cn, with n = 24, 28, 32, 36, 50, 60 and 70. Nature 1987, 329, 529–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jendrol, S.; Owens, P.J. Longest cycles in generalized Buckminsterfullerene graphs. J. Math. Chem. 1995, 18, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Knor, M.; Škrekovski, R.; Tepeh, A. Balaban Index of Cubic Graphs. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2015, 73, 519–528. [Google Scholar]
  22. Andova, V.; Došlić, T.; Krnc, M.; Lužar, B.; Škrekovski, R. On the diameter and some related invariants of fullerene graphs. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2012, 68, 109–130. [Google Scholar]
  23. Andova, V.; Kardoš, F.; Škrekovski, R. Sandwiching saturation number of fullerene graphs. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2015, 73, 501–518. [Google Scholar]
  24. Andova, V.; Škrekovski, R. Diameter of full icosahedral-symmetry fullerene graphs. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2013, 70, 205–220. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ashrafi, A.R.; Ghorbani, M. Eccentric Connectivity Index of Fullerenes. In Novel Molecular Structure Descriptors—Theory and Applications II; Gutman, I., Furtula, B., Eds.; University of Kragujevac: Kragujevac, Serbia, 2010; pp. 183–192. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sabirov, D.S.; Ōsawa, E. Information entropy of fullerenes. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2015, 55, 1576–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ashrafi, A.R.; Ghorbani, M.; Jalali, M. Eccentric connectivity polynomial of an infinite family of fullerenes. Optaelec. Adv. Mat. Rapid Comm. 2009, 3, 823–826. [Google Scholar]
  28. Balaban, A.T. Topological indices based on topological distances in molecular graphs. Pure Appl. Chem. 1983, 55, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Babić, D.; Klein, D.J.; Sah, C.H. Symmetry of fullerenes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 211, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boltalina, O.V.; Galeva, N.A. Direct fluorination of fullerenes, Russ. Chem. Rev. 2000, 69, 609–621. [Google Scholar]
  31. Brinkmann, G.; Dress, A.W.M. A constructive enumeration of fullerenes. J. Algorithams 1997, 23, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Brinkmann, G.; Fowler, P.W.; Manolopoulos, D.E.; Palser, A.H.R. A census of nanotube caps. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 315, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Brinkmann, G.; Graver, J.E.; Justus, C. Numbers of faces in disordered patches. J. Math. Chem. 2009, 45, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brinkmann, G.; Greenberg, S.; Greenhill, C.; McKay, B.D.; Thomas, R.; Wollan, P. Generation of simple quadrangulations of the sphere. Discrete Math. 2005, 305, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Došlić, T. On lower bounds of number of perfect matchings in fullerene graphs. J. Math. Chem. 1998, 24, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Došlić, T. On some structural properties of fullerene graphs. J. Math. Chem. 2002, 31, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Došlić, T. Cyclical edge-connectivity of fullerene graphs and (k, 6)-cages. J. Math. Chem. 2003, 33, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Došlić, T. Bipartivity of fullerene graphs and fullerene stability. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 412, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Došlić, T. Saturation number of fullerene graphs. J. Math. Chem. 2008, 43, 647–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Došlić, T. Leapfrog fullerenes have many perfect matchings. J. Math. Chem. 2008, 44, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Došlić, T.; Réti, T. Spectral properties of fullerene graphs. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2011, 66, 733–742. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dvořak, Z.; Lidicky, B.; Škrekovski, R. Bipartizing fullerenes. Eur. J. Combin. 2012, 33, 1286–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Erman, R.; Kardoš, F.; Miškuf, J. Long cycles in fullerene graphs. J. Math. Chem. 2009, 46, 1103–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Fajtlowicz, S.; Larson, C.E. Graph-Theoretic Independence as a Predictor of Fullerene Stability. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 377, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fowler, P.W.; Daugherty, S.; Myrvold, W. Independence number and fullerene stability. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 448, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ghorbani, M.; Songhori, M. Polyhedral graphs via their automorphism groups. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 321, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fowler, P.W.; Redmond, D.B. Symmetry aspects of bonding in carbon clusters: The leapfrog transformation. Theor. Chim. Acta 1992, 83, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fowler, P.W.; Rogers, K.M. Spiral codes and Goldberg representations of icosahedral fullerenes and octahedral analogues. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fowler, P.W.; Rogers, K.M.; Fajtlowicz, S.; Hansen, P.; Caporossi, G. Facts and conjectures about fullerene graphs: Leapfrog, cylindrical and Ramanujan fullerenes. In Algebraic Combinatorics and Applications; Betten, A., Kohnert, A., Laue, R., Wassermann, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ghorbani, M.; Heidari-Rad, S. Study of fullerenes by their algebraic properties. Iranian J. Math. Chem. 2012, 3, 9–24. [Google Scholar]
  51. Fowler, P.W.; Manolopoulos, D.E. An Atlas of Fullerenes; Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  52. Parker, M.C.; Jeynes, C. Fullerene stability by geometrical thermodynamics. Chem. Select 2020, 5, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ghorbani, M.; Iranmanesh, M.A. Computing eccentric connectivity polynomial of fullerenes. Fuller. Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct. 2013, 21, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ghorbani, M.; Bani-Asadi, E. Remarks on characteristic coefficients of fullerene graphs. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 230, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Goedgebeur, J.; McKay, B.D. Recursive generation of IPR fullerenes. J. Math. Chem. 2015, 53, 1702–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Goldberg, M. A class of multi-symmetric polyhedral. Tohoku Math. J. 1939, 43, 104–108. [Google Scholar]
  57. Goodey, P.R. A class of hamiltonian polytopes. J. Graph Theory 1977, 1, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Graver, J.E. The independence number of fullerenes and benzenoids. Eur. J. Combin. 2006, 27, 850–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Grunbaum, B.; Motzkin, T.S. The number of hexagons and the simplicity of geodesics on certain polyhedral. Can. J. Math. 1963, 15, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hasheminezhad, M.; Fleischner, H.; Mc Kay, B.D. A universal set of growth operations for fullerenes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 464, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Manolopoulos, D.E.; Woodall, D.R.; Fowler, P.W. Electronic stability of fullerenes: Eigenvalue theorems for leapfrog carbon clusters. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1992, 88, 2427–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hosoya, H.; Yamaguchi, T. Sextet polynomial, A new enumeration and proof technique for the resonance theory applied to the aromatic hydrocarbons. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 4659–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Keshri, S.; Tembe, B.L. Thermodynamics of association of water soluble fullerene derivatives [C60(OH)n, n = 0, 2, 4, 8 and 12] in aqueous media. J. Chem. Sci. 2017, 129, 1327–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Choudhury, N.; Pettitt, B.M. Entropy-enthalpy contributions to the potential of mean force of nanoscopic hydrophobic solutes. J. Phys. Chem. 2006, B 110, 8459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Ju, Y.; Liang, H.; Zhang, J.; Bai, F. A note on Fowler-Manolopoulos predictor of fullerene stability. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2010, 64, 419–424. [Google Scholar]
  66. Manolopoulos, D.E.; Fowler, P.W. A fullerene without a spiral. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 204, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Manolopoulos, D.E.; Fowler, P.W.; Taylor, R.; Kroto, H.W.; Walton, D.R.M. Faraday communications. An end to the search for the ground state of C84? J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. R. Soc. Chem. 1992, 88, 3117–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Manolopoulos, D.E.; May, J.C. Theoretical studies of the fullerenes: C34 to C70. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 181, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Balasubramanian, K. Enumeration of stereo, position and chiral isomers of polysubstituted giant fullerenes: Applications to C180 and C240. Fuller. Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct. 2020, 1744573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Schwerdtfeger, P.; Wirz, L.N.; Avery, J. The topology of fullerenes. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2015, 5, 96–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Fowler, P.W. Chemical Graph Theory of Fullerenes. In From Chemical Topology to Three-Dimensional Geometry; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 237–262. [Google Scholar]
  72. Stevanović, D.; Caporossi, G. On the (1, 2)-spectral spread of fullerenes. In Graphs and Discovery; Fajtlowicz, S., Fowler, P.W., Hansen, P., Janowitz, M.F., Roberts, F.S., Eds.; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2005; pp. 365–370. [Google Scholar]
  73. Stone, A.J.; Wales, D.J. Theoretical studies of icosahedral C60 and some related species. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 128, 501–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ye, D.; Qi, Z.; Zhang, H. On k-resonant fullerene graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 2009, 23, 1023–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Qi, Z.; Zhang, H. A note on the cyclical edge-connectivity of fullerene graphs. J. Math. Chem. 2008, 43, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, H.; Ye, D. An upper bound for the Clar number of fullerene graphs. J. Math. Chem. 2007, 41, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Anand, K.; Bianconi, G. Entropy measures for networks: Toward an information theory of complex topologies. Phys. Rev. E 2009, 80, 045102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Basak, S.C.; Balaban, A.T.; Grunwald, G.D.; Gute, B.D. Topological indices: Their nature and mutual relatedness. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bonchev, D. Information Theoretic Indices for Characterization of Chemical Structures; Research Studies Press: Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  80. Bonchev, D. Kolmogorov’s information, Shannon’s entropy, and topological complexity of molecules. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 1995, 28, 567–582. [Google Scholar]
  81. Bonchev, D.; Rouvray, D.H. (Eds.) Complexity in Chemistry, Biology, and Ecology, Mathematical and Computational Chemistry; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  82. Bonchev, D.; Trinajstić, N. Information theory, distance matrix and molecular branching. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 67, 4517–4533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Butts, C.T. The complexity of social networks: Theoretical and empirical findings. Soc. Netw. 2001, 23, 31–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Constantine, G. Graph complexity and the Laplacian matrix in blocked experiments. Linear Multilinear Algebra 1990, 28, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Dehmer, M. Strukturelle Analyse web-basierter Dokumente. In Multimedia und Telekooperation; Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  86. Dehmer, M. Information processing in complex networks: Graph entropy and information functionals. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 201, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dehmer, M.; Barbarini, N.; Varmuza, K.; Graber, A. Novel topological descriptors for analyzing biological networks. BMC Struct. Biol. 2010, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Dehmer, M.; Emmert-Streib, F. Analysis of Complex Networks: From Biology to Linguistics; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  89. Dehmer, M.; Mehler, A. A new method of measuring similarity for a special class of directed graphs. Tatra Mt. Math. Publ. 2007, 36, 39–59. [Google Scholar]
  90. Shannon, C.E.; Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1949. [Google Scholar]
  91. Dehmer, M.; Mowshowitz, A. A history of graph entropy measures. Inform. Sci. 2011, 1, 57–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dehmer, M.; Mowshowitz, A. Generalized graph entropies. Complexity 2011, 17, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dehmer, M.; Mowshowitz, A.; Emmert-Streib, F. Connections between classical and parametric network entropies. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e15733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Dehmer, M.; Sivakumar, L.; Varmuza, K. Uniquely discriminating molecular structures using novel eigenvalue-based descriptors. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2012, 67, 147–172. [Google Scholar]
  95. Dehmer, M.; Varmuza, K.; Borgert, S.; Emmert-Streib, F. On entropy-based molecular descriptors: Statistical analysis of real and synthetic chemical structures. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1655–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Emmert-Streib, F.; Dehmer, M. Information theoretic measures of UHG graphs with low computational complexity. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 190, 1783–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kolmogorov, A.N. Three approaches to the definition of information (in Russian). Probl. Peredaci Inform. 1965, 1, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  98. Li, M.; Vitànyi, P. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  99. Mehler, A.; Weiß, P.; Lucking, A. A network model of interpersonal alignment. Entrop 2010, 12, 1440–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Mowshowitz, A. Entropy and the complexity of the graphs: I. An index of the relative complexity of a graph. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1968, 30, 175–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rashevsky, N. Life, information theory, and topology. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1955, 17, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sole, R.V.; Montoya, J.M. Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2001, 268, 2039–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wilhelm, T.; Hollunder, J. Information theoretic description of networks. Physica A 2007, 388, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Thurner, S. Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks. In Analysis of Complex Networks: From Biology to Linguistics; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2009; pp. 23–45. [Google Scholar]
  105. Ulanowicz, R.E. Quantitative methods for ecological network analysis. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2004, 28, 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ghorbani, M. Connective eccentric index of fullerenes. J. Math. Nanosci. 2001, 1, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  107. Wiener, H. Structural determination of paraffin boiling points. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 69, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hosoya, H. On some counting polynomials. Discrete Appl. Math. 1988, 19, 239–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Mowshowitz, A. Entropy and the complexity of graphs II: The information content of digraphs and infinite graphs. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1968, 30, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mowshowitz, A. Entropy and the complexity of graphs III: Graphs with prescribed information content. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1968, 30, 387–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mowshowitz, A. Entropy and the complexity of graphs IV: Entropy measures and graphical structure. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1968, 30, 533–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Mowshowitz, A.; Dehmer, M. The Hosoya entropy of a graph. Entropy 2015, 17, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Djafari, S.; Koorepazan-Moftakhar, F.; Ashrafi, A.R. Eccentric sequences of two infinite classes of fullerenes. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 2013, 10, 2636–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Došlić, T.; Ghorbani, M.; Hosseinzadeh, M. Eccentric connectivity polynomial of some graph operations. Utilitas Math. 2011, 84, 297–309. [Google Scholar]
  115. Sharafdini, R.; Safazadeh, M. On eccentric adjacency index of several infinite classes of fullerenes. Bri. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2016, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Biggs, N. Algebraic Graph Theory, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  117. Gutman, I. The energy of a graph. Ber. Math.-Stat. Sekt. Forsch. Graz. 1978, 103, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  118. Gutman, I. The Energy of a Graph: Old and New Results. In Algebraic Combinatorics and Applications; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  119. Gutman, I.; Furtula, B. Novel Molecular Structure Descriptors—Theory and Applications II; University of Kragujevac: Kragujevac, Serbia, 2010; pp. 183–192. [Google Scholar]
  120. Gutman, I.; Polansky, O.E. Mathematical Concepts in Organic Chemistry; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Geramny, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  121. Fowler, P.W. Fullerene graphs with more negative than positive eigenvalues: The exceptions that prove the rule of electron deficiency? J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1997, 93, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Fowler, P.W.; Hansen, P.; Stevanović, D. A note on the smallest eigenvalue of fullerenes. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2003, 48, 37–48. [Google Scholar]
  123. Dehmer, M.; Emmert-Streib, F.; Shi, Y. Interrelations of graph distance measures based on topological indices. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Dehmer, M.; Emmert-Streib, F.; Shi, Y. Graph distance measures based on topological indices revisited. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 266, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ghorbani, M.; Dehmer, M.; Zangi, S. Graph operations based on using distance-based graph entropies. Appl. Math. Comput. 2018, 333, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Harary, F. Graph Theory; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  127. Mowshowitz, A.; Dehmer, M. A symmtry index for graphs. Symmetry Cult. Sci. 2010, 21, 321–327. [Google Scholar]
  128. Ghorbani, M.; Dehmer, M.; Mowshowitz, A.; Tao, J.; Emmert-Streib, F. The Hosoya entropy of graphs revisited. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Ghorbani, M.; Dehmer, M.; Rajabi-Parsa, M.; Mowshowitz, A.; Emmert-Streib, F. Hosoya entropy of fullerene graphs. Appl. Math. Comput. 2019, 352, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustration of two cubic graphs: (a) Cuneane; (b) cube.
Figure 1. Illustration of two cubic graphs: (a) Cuneane; (b) cube.
Mathematics 08 00740 g001
Figure 2. The 2-D graph of zig-zag nanotube TZ[5,10].
Figure 2. The 2-D graph of zig-zag nanotube TZ[5,10].
Mathematics 08 00740 g002
Figure 3. Cap B.
Figure 3. Cap B.
Mathematics 08 00740 g003
Figure 4. The presentation of fullerene A10n as a combining of two copies of B and the nanotube TZ[5,n − 4].
Figure 4. The presentation of fullerene A10n as a combining of two copies of B and the nanotube TZ[5,n − 4].
Mathematics 08 00740 g004
Figure 5. Three-dimensional graph of zig-zag polyhex nanotori.
Figure 5. Three-dimensional graph of zig-zag polyhex nanotori.
Mathematics 08 00740 g005
Figure 6. Two-dimensional lattice for T[p,q].
Figure 6. Two-dimensional lattice for T[p,q].
Mathematics 08 00740 g006
Figure 7. The molecular graph of the fullerene C24n+12, for n = 3.
Figure 7. The molecular graph of the fullerene C24n+12, for n = 3.
Mathematics 08 00740 g007
Figure 8. The molecular graph of the fullerene C12n+2.
Figure 8. The molecular graph of the fullerene C12n+2.
Mathematics 08 00740 g008
Figure 9. Two vertices with the same total distance which are not H-equivalent.
Figure 9. Two vertices with the same total distance which are not H-equivalent.
Mathematics 08 00740 g009
Figure 10. The vertices u and v are not H-equivalent but D(u) = D(v).
Figure 10. The vertices u and v are not H-equivalent but D(u) = D(v).
Mathematics 08 00740 g010
Figure 11. A cubic co-distance graph of diameter 4 with non-zero H-entropy.
Figure 11. A cubic co-distance graph of diameter 4 with non-zero H-entropy.
Mathematics 08 00740 g011
Figure 12. The fullerene A12n+4.
Figure 12. The fullerene A12n+4.
Mathematics 08 00740 g012
Figure 13. The orbits of the ith layer (2 ≤ in)of the fullerene graph A12n+4.
Figure 13. The orbits of the ith layer (2 ≤ in)of the fullerene graph A12n+4.
Mathematics 08 00740 g013
Figure 14. The subgraph B1.
Figure 14. The subgraph B1.
Mathematics 08 00740 g014
Figure 15. The subgraph B2.
Figure 15. The subgraph B2.
Mathematics 08 00740 g015
Figure 16. The 3-dimensional structure of fullerene graph A12n+4.
Figure 16. The 3-dimensional structure of fullerene graph A12n+4.
Mathematics 08 00740 g016
Figure 17. The Hosoya-partitions of Tz[6,n − 10].
Figure 17. The Hosoya-partitions of Tz[6,n − 10].
Mathematics 08 00740 g017
Table 1. The eccentricity of vertices of C24n+12, n ≥ 7.
Table 1. The eccentricity of vertices of C24n+12, n ≥ 7.
Verticesσ (x)No
Vertices of type 1n + 512
Vertices of type 2n + i (6 ≤ in + 5)24
Table 2. Some exceptional cases of C24n+12 fullerenes.
Table 2. Some exceptional cases of C24n+12 fullerenes.
FullerenesIfσ(F)
C60log 60
C84log 84
C108 log 1320 1008 log 12 + 312 log 13 1320
C132 log 1728 ( 720 log 12 + 312 log 13 + 336 log 14 + 360 log 15 1728 )
C156 log 2232 ( 432 log 12 + 312 log 13 + 336 log 14 + 360 log 15 + 384 log 16 + 408 log 17 2232 )
Table 3. The eccentricity of vertices of C12n+2, n ≥ 10.
Table 3. The eccentricity of vertices of C12n+2, n ≥ 10.
Verticesσ(x)No.
Vertices of type 12n8
Vertices of type 2n6
Other Verticesn + i (1 ≤ in)12
Table 4. Some exceptional cases of C12n+2 fullerenes.
Table 4. Some exceptional cases of C12n+2 fullerenes.
FIfσ(F)
C26 log 132 120 log 5 + 12 log 6 132
C38 log 266 log 7 = log 38
C50 log 392 84 log 7 + 272 log 8 + 36 log 9 392
C62 log 548 192 log 8 + 216 log 9 + 140 log 10 548
C74 log 720 96 log 8 + 216 log 9 + 180 log 10 + 132 log 11 + 96 log 12 720
C86 log 940 216 log 9 + 180 log 10 + 132 log 11 + 144 log 12 + 156 log 13 + 112 log 14 940
C98 log 1088 108 log 9 + 180 log 10 + 132 log 11 + 144 log 12 + 156 log 13 + 168 log 14 + 180 log 15 + 128 log 16 1088
C110 log 1500 180 log 10 + 132 log 11 + 144 log 12 + 156 log 13 + 168 log 14 + 180 log 15 + 128 log 16 + 204 log 17 + 144 log 18 1088
Table 5. The H-partition and eccentricity of fullerene graph.
Table 5. The H-partition and eccentricity of fullerene graph.
PartitionsElementsecc
V112n + 1
V2n + 612n − 1, 12n, 12n + 1, 12n + 2, 12n + 3, 12n + 4
V22, 5, 82n
V2n + 512n − 13, 12n − 11, 12n – 9, 12n − 7, 12n − 5, 12n − 3
V33, 4, 6, 7, 9, 102n − 1
V2n + 412n − 12, 12n − 10, 12n – 8, 12n − 6, 12n − 4, 12n − 2
V412, 14, 16, 18, 20, 222n − 2
V2n + 312n − 25, 12n − 23, 12n − 21, 12n − 19, 12n − 17, 12n − 15
V511, 15, 192n − 3
V613, 17, 21
V2n + 212n − 24, 12n − 22, 12n − 20, 12n − 18, 12n − 16, 12n − 14
V723, 27, 312n − 4
V825, 29, 33
V2n + 112n − 36, 12n − 34, 12n − 32, 12n − 30, 12n − 28, 12n − 26
V924, 26, 28, 30, 32, 342n − 5
V2n12n − 37, 12n − 35, 12n − 33, 12n − 31, 12n − 29, 12n − 27
V1036, 38, 40, 42, 44, 462n − 6
V2n−112n − 49, 12n − 47, 12n − 45, 12n − 43, 12n − 41, 12n − 39
V1135, 39, 432n − 7
V1237, 41, 45
V2n − 212n − 48, 12n − 46, 12n − 44, 12n − 42, 12n − 40, 12n − 38
V1347, 51, 552n − 8
V1449, 53, 57
V2n − 312n − 60, 12n − 58, 12n − 56, 12n − 54, 12n − 52, 12n − 50
V1548, 50, 52, 54, 56, 582n − 9
V2n − 412n − 61, 12n − 59, 12n − 57, 12n − 55, 12n − 55, 12n − 53, 12n − 51
Table 6. The graph energy and five types of entropies applied to A12n+4.
Table 6. The graph energy and five types of entropies applied to A12n+4.
nEDIfσIaHHecc
11212.877.087.065.024.723.57
12231.737.27.185.144.823.68
13250.597.327.295.254.923.79
14269.467.427.395.365.013.89
15288.327.527.495.455.093.98
16307.197.617.585.545.184.07
17326.057.77.675.635.254.15
18344.917.787.755.715.334.23
19363.787.857.855.785.44.31
20382.647.937.95.865.464.38
Table 7. The correlation between graph energy and entropies applied to A12n+4.
Table 7. The correlation between graph energy and entropies applied to A12n+4.
E,DE, IfσE,IaE,HE,Hecc
Cor0.99640060.99723260.996730.99757280.9974525

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghorbani, M.; Dehmer, M.; Emmert-Streib, F. Properties of Entropy-Based Topological Measures of Fullerenes. Mathematics 2020, 8, 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050740

AMA Style

Ghorbani M, Dehmer M, Emmert-Streib F. Properties of Entropy-Based Topological Measures of Fullerenes. Mathematics. 2020; 8(5):740. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050740

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghorbani, Modjtaba, Matthias Dehmer, and Frank Emmert-Streib. 2020. "Properties of Entropy-Based Topological Measures of Fullerenes" Mathematics 8, no. 5: 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050740

APA Style

Ghorbani, M., Dehmer, M., & Emmert-Streib, F. (2020). Properties of Entropy-Based Topological Measures of Fullerenes. Mathematics, 8(5), 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050740

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop