Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Next Article in Journal
Development of Highly Efficient Universal Pneumocystis Primers and Their Application in Investigating the Prevalence and Genetic Diversity of Pneumocystis in Wild Hares and Rabbits
Next Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Characterization of Tuber maculatum, New in Uruguay: Morphological, Molecular, and Aromatic Analyses
Previous Article in Journal
Mapping the Burden of Fungal Diseases in the United Arab Emirates
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in Black Truffle (Tuber melanosporum) Aroma during Storage under Different Conditions

Department of Analytical Chemistry and Reference Materials, Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und-Prüfung (BAM), 12489 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(5), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050354
Submission received: 12 April 2024 / Revised: 7 May 2024 / Accepted: 11 May 2024 / Published: 15 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Tuber Fungi)
Graphical abstract
">
Figure 1
<p>Typical (HS)SPME/GC–MS total ion chromatogram of <span class="html-italic">Tuber melanosporum</span>.</p> ">
Figure 2
<p>Retention time vs. retention index plot for measured RI and reference from the literature.</p> ">
Figure 3
<p><span class="html-italic">p</span>-value histograms for dependence on time point (TP), temperature, processing type (condition), and both TP and temperature. (<b>Top</b>): linear, (<b>Bottom</b>): logarithmic scale. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are multiple-testing-corrected using the method of Benjamini–Hochberg (BH).</p> ">
Figure 4
<p>Principal component analysis of stored truffle samples. Storage time (d) is indicated by numbers. Storage temperatures of <span style="color:#EA8B00">room temperature</span>, <span style="color:#5195D3">fridge</span>, and <span style="color:#000099">freezer</span> are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.</p> ">
Figure 5
<p>Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for formic acid, 1-methylpropyl ester (<b>A</b>), 2-methylpropanal (<b>B</b>), 1,3-dimethylbenzene (<b>C</b>), 3-methylfuran (<b>D</b>), Tetrahydrofuran (<b>E</b>), and Nonanal (<b>F</b>). Storage temperatures of <span style="color:#EA8B00">room temperature</span>, <span style="color:#5195D3">fridge</span>, and <span style="color:#000099">freezer</span> are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols. To allow easier comparison between groups, lines colored according to temperature levels connect replicate means per time point. Additionally, samples for each time point have been shifted slightly on the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis according to the applied processing type. Plot annotations provide information on retention time (RT), ion mass (mz), sum formula, peak ID, and the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values obtained in an ANOVA with 3 factors.</p> ">
Figure 6
<p>Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for 4-hydroxy-2-pentanone (<b>A</b>), naphthalene (<b>B</b>), formic acid, butyl ester (<b>C</b>), 2,4-dimethylanisole (<b>D</b>), methanol (<b>E</b>), and 3-phenylfuran (<b>F</b>). Storage temperatures of <span style="color:#EA8B00">room temperature</span>, <span style="color:#5195D3">fridge</span>, and <span style="color:#000099">freezer</span> are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.</p> ">
Figure 7
<p>Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for 1-chloropentane (<b>A</b>), 3-methyl-2-butanol (<b>B</b>), 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butanone (<b>C</b>), 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-methylbenzene (<b>D</b>), 3-methylhexanal (<b>E</b>), and indane (<b>F</b>). Storage temperatures of <span style="color:#EA8B00">room temperature</span>, <span style="color:#5195D3">fridge</span>, and <span style="color:#000099">freezer</span> are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.</p> ">
Figure 8
<p>Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for dimethyl sulfide (<b>A</b>), 2-methylthiazole (<b>B</b>), methional (<b>C</b>), dimethyl sulfone (<b>D</b>), and dimethyl trisulfide (<b>E</b>). Storage temperatures of <span style="color:#EA8B00">room temperature</span>, <span style="color:#5195D3">fridge</span>, and <span style="color:#000099">freezer</span> are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.</p> ">
Figure 9
<p>Top enriched metabolites by main chemical class in sliced samples, divided by storage temperature.</p> ">
Figure 10
<p>Top enriched metabolites by main chemical class in fridge samples, divided by treatment method.</p> ">
Figure 11
<p>Pathway analysis of room temperature sliced samples and selected metabolite pathways that include more than 2 identified compounds.</p> ">
Figure A1
<p>Alignment results of the MS-DIAL deconvolution process. All peaks (<b>top</b>) and identified peaks (<b>bottom</b>) in comparison with NIST library.</p> ">
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The enticing aroma of truffles is a key factor for their culinary value. Although all truffle species tend to be pricy, the most intensely aromatic species are the most sought after. Research into the aroma of truffles encompasses various disciplines including chemistry, biology, and sensory science. This study focusses on the chemical composition of the aroma of black truffles (Tuber melanosporum) and the changes occurring under different storage conditions. For this, truffle samples were stored under different treatments, at different temperatures, and measured over a total storage time of 12 days. Measurements of the truffle aroma profiles were taken with SPME/GC–MS at regular intervals. To handle the ample data collected, a systematic approach utilizing multivariate data analysis techniques was taken. This approach led to a vast amount of data which we made publicly available for future exploration. Results reveal the complexity of aroma changes, with 695 compounds identified, highlighting the need for a comprehensive understanding. Principal component analyses offer initial insights into truffle composition, while individual compounds may serve as markers for age (formic acid, 1-methylpropyl ester), freshness (2-Methyl-1-propanal; 1-(methylthio)-propane), freezing (tetrahydrofuran), salt treatment (1-chloropentane), or heat exposure (4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butanone). This research suggests that heat treatment or salt contact significantly affects truffle aroma, while freezing and cutting have less pronounced effects in comparison. The enrichment of compounds showing significant changes during storage was investigated with a metabolomic pathway analysis. The involvement of some of the enriched compounds on the pyruvate/glycolysis and sulfur pathways was shown.

Graphical Abstract">

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

There are several different truffle species that are consumed as food. Some are moderately expensive; some are among the most expensive foods that exist. Apart from their seasonality and rarity, the respective value is mainly attributed to their aroma [1]. The aroma is affected by species but also by the geographic origin, ripeness, climate, genetics, and soil composition [2,3,4].
There are about 30 species of truffles that are being traded commercially. The two most expensive and sought-after truffle species are the black Perigord truffle (Tuber melanosporum) and the white Alba truffle (Tuber magnatum). Most commercially relevant are Tuber melanosporum because they can be cultivated in truffle orchards. By inoculating the roots of young suitable trees like oak and hazelnut with truffle spores, the fungus will grow in symbiosis with the trees [5,6,7]. The smell of ripe truffles is also what attracts fungivore animals (and truffle dogs) to them [8,9]. Truffles can be found predominantly in southern Europe in countries like Italy, France, and Spain. In recent years, however, orchards have also been established in Australia, Argentina, the USA, and other places [10,11,12,13]. The life cycle of truffles is comprised of the succession of three different phases. In the first phase, the mycelia grow. Then, the ectomycorrhiza is formed. Finally, the (edible) fruiting body develops [2].
The aroma of truffle is comprised of dozens to hundreds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Among them are aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, organic acids, esters, terpenes, or organic sulfur compounds [14,15]. While many of these compounds, like ethanol, acetaldehyde, and acetone, can also be found in various natural aromas, others are more unique to truffles in general or for single truffle species. Often the smell of truffles is described as earthy, damp-forest-like, cooked potato leather, or sulfurous. Key odorants that were found in multiple studies are, for example, 3-methylbutanal, 2-methylbutanal, 2-methylbutan-1-ol, 1-octen-3-ol, 2-methyl-1-propanol, or anisole. It was found in previous research that organic sulfur compounds play an especially import role in the truffle aroma and may be key to the attraction and ripeness of them. Dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide were present in different truffle species, while 2,4-dithiapentane seems to be specific for Tuber magnatum and thiophene derivatives to Tuber borchii [16,17,18,19].
While these are examples of findings in multiple prior works, it is important to note that the aroma of truffles can vary greatly, not only by species but also due to soil conditions, time of harvest, microorganisms present, weather, and many other factors not yet fully understood. Additionally, the published aroma compositions are obtained utilizing different analytical techniques. While most researchers seem to use some form of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) coupling [20,21,22,23,24,25], often in combination with solid-phase microextraction (SPME) or headspace sampling (HS), others also use direct-injection mass spectrometry (DIMS) [26,27,28] or other techniques [29,30,31] to obtain their results. Therefore, the aroma compositions published for truffles can vary greatly.
As food, truffles have a limited shelf life of normally only 7–10 days. This is mainly attributed to their high water content and biological activity from bacteria and mold growth [32]. In this timespan, they typically lose their enticing aroma. This is due to oxidation, enzymatic reactions, or simply degassing during storage. To combat this loss of aroma, truffles are often processed into truffle-flavored forms like truffle oils, spreads, cheese, or preserved meat products [33,34]. The preservation of their culinary attributes without these processes seems to be especially difficult.
There are some studies that investigate the possibility of preserving whole truffles through means of freezing, freeze-drying, encapsulation, canning, drying, refrigeration, pasteurization, inert atmosphere, or others. Freeze-drying seems to have been of special interest and showed to maintain some of the truffle’s aroma after rehydration. There are also studies that investigated the changes of truffle aroma during storage or in general under various conditions. Important examples of these works are:
Siskovic et al. found that freeze-drying significantly alters the VOC profile of truffle but were still able to distinguish between different species using multivariate discriminant analysis [35]. Although, the organoleptic qualities were still affected negatively by freeze-drying. For their study, they conducted HS-SPME/GC–MS measurements. A microbiological comparison of Tuber melanosporum stored at 4 °C whole, sliced, or freeze-dried was carried out by Phong et al. via plate counts of different microbes. They found that the total microbial count was generally lower for the freeze-dried truffles [36]. Campo et al. evaluated the preservation methods of freeze-drying, hot-air drying, freezing, and canning in a study combining the results from SPME/GC–MS and an olfactometric panel. They found that only the freeze-drying and hot-air drying processes could retain key aroma compounds [37]. Freezing truffles preserves truffles on a biological level but has been shown to negatively affect the texture and perceived aroma.
Longo et al. traced the antioxidant power of truffles stored under reduced and modified atmosphere. The reduced atmosphere was found to be better suited for storage. Also, markers for freshness (adducts of glutathione and adenine) and degradation (acetyl-carnitine adduct with cysteinyl-glycine) could be identified [38]. For their study, they used HPLC coupled with a CoulArray detector. Similarly, Savini et al. stored black truffles under various atmospheric conditions. They were able to prolong shelf lives up to two weeks and could correlate antioxidant activity with three volatile aldehydes using a mix of SPME–GC/MS and HPLC–MS/MS measurements [39].
The influence of bacteria on the aroma deterioration of tuber aestivum was investigated by Vahdatzadeh et al. The gradual replacement of bacteria characteristic for fresh truffles with food spoilage bacteria was observed with SPME–GC/MS measurements. Furthermore, they could also identify volatile markers for freshness and spoilage (i.e., dimethyl sulfide (DMS), butan-2-one, 2-methylbutan-1-ol, and 2-phenylethan-1-ol) [40]. In another study, Savini et al. found that hypobaric packaging at 30 kPa was able to prolong the shelf life of truffles up to 14 days considering epiphytic microbial population, firmness, weight loss, CO2 formation, and sensory properties [41]. For their study, they combined SPME–GC/MS with sensory and firmness measurements.
Tuber melanosporum samples from Australia were investigated by Choo et al. They observed significant changes in 11 key volatiles (carbon dioxide, acetaldehyde, 2-butanone, 3-methyl-1-butanal, toluene, 2-butenal, formic acid 2- methyl butyl ester, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 6-methyl-2-heptanol, 3-octanol, and dimethyl sulfoxide) in GC–MS measurements mostly in the first 7 days of storage in the fridge. Some similarities and some differences compared to the aroma of European truffles were noted [42]. Tuber magnatum changes during storage were studied by Niimi et al. with GC–MS and PCR-high-throughput sequencing They too found numerous changes in the aroma profile, most notably a steep reduction in the key VOC 2,4-dithiapentane [43].
Phong et al. investigated the extraction of natural truffle aromas via supercritical carbon dioxide extraction as a way to overcome the short shelf life of truffles [44]. It proved to be a viable method, although the aroma was altered to some degree.
Any form of heat treatment seems to have a strong effect on truffle aroma and organoleptic evaluations [45]. Thus, refrigeration remains the most common preservation method, even though it extends the shelf life by only a few days.
The changes in the aroma of truffles are not yet fully understood. As shown above, previous studies came to different, sometimes uncorrelated, results that are not always consistent. Because of this, we aim to expand the knowledge in this field with this work. We are interested in the changes of the aroma profile of truffles during storage, since it may be of value to develop better conservation methods and constitute an insight into the processes going on in truffles after harvest.
To do this, we focused on Tuber melanosporum for this investigation. To generate a large amount of data, we stored truffles under different conditions, at different temperatures, and took measurements over a total storage time of 12 days. The goal was to integrate several factors simultaneously with this experimental layout. We intended to generate dense time course data of metabolic traits in a non-targeted fashion and hypothesize that these data can be used to model the process of deterioration and, in this way, could lead to better conservation strategies.
Measurements of the truffle aroma profiles were taken with SPME/GC–MS at regular intervals. To handle the ample data collected, we took a systematic approach utilizing multivariate data analysis techniques.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fruiting Bodies

Samples of Tuber melanosporum were purchased online (Ross Ltd., Berlin, Germany). Upon receipt, the truffle samples were immediately visually and sensorially checked for authenticity of the variety and freshness.

2.2. Sample Preparation

For the storage experiment, samples were prepared on the day of arrival. The shipment contained 150 g of Tuber melanosporum in 5 roughly equally sized specimens. For each sample, 0.5 g of Tuber melanosporum was weighed in and stored inside a hermetically sealed 10 mL headspace vial with a septum. To ensure homogenization, all specimens were cut and randomized first. Although cutting the truffle samples inevitably leads to a faster loss of aroma compared to whole truffles, it was necessary to ensure equal-weighted portions and to fit samples into headspace vials.
Samples were stored for 12 days total and with measurements taken every 2 days including day 0. Therefore, 7 rounds of measurements were taken on days 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.
Samples were stored at 3 different temperatures. The room temperature (RT) was 21 ± 1.5 °C, refrigerated temperature (KS) was 8 ± 0.5 °C, and freezer temperature was −30 ± 0.2 °C.
Furthermore, samples were stored after 4 different processing types. Sliced samples (S) were cut into 0.5 mm thin slices with a truffle slicer. Pieces of truffle (B) were broken off from truffles and cut to the exact weight. As a method for enzymatic inhibition, another part of the sliced truffle samples was sealed with the addition of 1 g of NaCl. Lastly, a portion of the samples were blanched for 2 min in 90 °C distilled water. Afterward, the blanched samples were dried with paper towels, sliced, weighed, and sealed.
For each sample, a repeat measurement was prepared. In total, for the 3 temperatures × 4 processing types × 7 measurement time points × 2 repetitions, 168 samples were prepared and stored.
Due to the long duration for each measurement cycle (60 min) and number of samples, on each measuring day, the samples were measured in the same order and taken out of storage consecutively as close to their measuring time as possible. All measured samples are listed in Table A1 in order of measurement.

2.3. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

For the GC–MS measurements, the autosampler Gerstel MPS—Multi Purpose Sampler (Gerstel, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) was used. All samples were transferred to the agitator at 40 °C for 15 min before injection.
For the SPME measurement, the SPME fiber 50/30 microm PVB/CAR/PDMS, Stabflex by Supelco (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany) was used. Before and after each splitless injection, the fiber was baked out at 200 °C for 15 min. The loading of the fiber was carried out for 5 min at 40 °C. Desorption in the GC–MS apparatus took place for 45 s at a temperature of 200 °C.
The Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) was equipped with a VF-624 ms column (60 m × 0.32 mm ID, 1.8 µm film thickness, Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany)). The column is specially designed for volatile and semi-volatile compounds. Helium 5.0 was used as the carrier gas (2.22 mL/min, constant flow). After the injection, the temperature of 40 °C was kept in the column oven for 15 min. This was followed by a temperature increase of 5 °C/min up to a temperature of 180° C. Finally, the temperature was increased by 25 °C/min up to a temperature of 220 °C and held for 15 min, resulting in a total run time of 59.6 min.
The eluting substances were detected with an Agilent Technologies 5977A mass spectrometer using EI ionization at 70 eV and nominal mass precision. In scan mode, 30 m/z was set as the start mass and 300 m/z as the end mass. The analysis frequency was 6 scans/s at a speed of 1.562 u/s. The gain factor was set to 2.

2.4. Data Analysis

For data collection, the software Chemstation version C.01.05 (Agilent) was used. All files were recorded using the .D format.
Further data processing was conducted utilizing the software tool MS-Dial v. 4.9.221218 (RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan), which is free to download (http://prime.psc.riken.jp/compms/msdial/main.html, accessed on 1 March 2024).
GC–MS data were imported into MS-DIAL with a mass range of 30–300 Da and Retention times of 0–65 min. Spectral deconvolution, alignment, and peak identification were performed using the following parameters: Peak detection parameters: minimum peak height: 1000 amplitude; smoothing method: linear-weighted moving average, with 3 scans smoothing level; deconvolution parameters: sigma window value: 0.5, EI spectra cutoff: 10 amplitude; peak identification settings: utilizing Retention Indices (RI), Index type Alkanes, RI tolerance: 100, Retention time tolerance: 2.5 min, m/z tolerance: 0.5 Da, EI similarity cutoff: 85%, identification cutoff: 70%, use retention information for scoring but not for filtering. For this purpose, previously recorded Kovats retention indices were measured by interpolating the measured retention times between those of adjacent n-alkanes. The measured retention indices (RI) were compared with the literature-known RIs derived from the NIST v17 library. The peak identifications were then verified by hand. The retention order and the plausibility of the occurrence of the substance in the sample type were considered as soft decision criteria in case of multiple potential or in case of dubious annotations.
Afterwards, the alignment results matrix was exported as an .msp file. Further statistical computing and graphics were carried out with the software R v. 4.3.2 (R Core Team) available online for free (https://www.r-project.org/, accessed on 1 March 2024) using the MetabolomicsBasics package v.1.4.5 [46].
The data analytics combining the results with biological processes were performed with MetaboAnalyst 6.0, available online for free (https://dev.metaboanalyst.ca/home.xhtml, accessed on 1 March 2024). For this, a cleaned-up data matrix was used as input. The two modules Enrichment Analysis and Pathway Analysis were utilized for sets of samples filtered by treatment process and storage temperature.
The Quantitative Enrichment Analysis was conducted using the storage times as a continuous group label. The samples were normalized by median and log10-transformed. The enrichment test was performed using Super-class and Main-class chemical structures libraries containing at least 2 entries.
The Pathway analysis was performed with the same parameters, except the pathway library Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 was selected.

3. Results

3.1. Storage of Samples

The presented work aims to investigate changes in the truffle aroma during storage. For this, we decided to focus on Tuber melanosporum as it is the most commercially relevant truffle species and known for its intense and complex aroma.
To allow modelling of the deterioration process, we decided to use 21 °C, 8 °C, and −30 °C as temperature levels. We hypothesize that the comparison of time course metabolic profiles at preserving (−30 °C) and unfavorable (21 °C) conditions will allow to identify the metabolic processes causal for aroma degradation. As storage conditions, it was decided to firstly investigate the transition of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the gas phase. For this, the comparison between pre-sliced and chunks of truffles was chosen. The effect of the enhanced surface area of the sliced samples on the facilitation of VOC migration to the gas phase, and hence faster aroma degradation phase, was to be investigated. To study the effect of enzymatic inhibition and dry-out of samples, the storage with added NaCl was performed. Lastly, to gain insight into the effect of heat treatment, blanched samples were added to the sample pool.
The storage experiment was carried out over 12 days since this is the usual maximum shelf life of truffles. Measurements were taken only every other day as a full set of measurements took longer than 24 h, therefore measurements could not be carried out every day. More details of the sample preparation and (HS)SPME/GC–MS measurements during storage times are described in Section 2.2.

3.2. Data Treatment

A typical (HS)SPME/GC–MS chromatogram of Tuber melanosporum is shown in Figure 1. Since only relative changes in concentrations of VOC compounds were of interest in this study, a calibration was omitted and would not have been feasible with respect to the number of compounds annotated.
All chromatographic and mass spectrometric data were loaded into MS-DIAL for further processing. The tool was developed for untargeted metabolomics for multiple instruments and vendors [47]. It allows for spectral deconvolution and peak identifications [48]. The deconvolution combines individual peaks into compound spectra, which is sometimes difficult for co-eluting compounds. A beneficial side effect is the removal of noise ions. Details of the program’s settings used can be found in Section 2.4. After deconvolution, 1626 spectra could be identified (see Figure A1). Utilizing spectral and retention index comparison with NIST library, 695 compounds could be annotated.
To check for the quality of matches, the retention time (RT) was plotted versus the retention index (RI) for RIs that were measured and RIs from the literature. The plot is shown in Figure 2. The reason for the measured plot (red) not being linear is the programmed temperature protocol of the GC run. Overall, comparing measured to the literature values, however, they are in good agreement. The matrix with peak integrations values for all identified peaks for all measured samples was then exported for further processing and is provided online (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10886445, accessed on 1 March 2024).

3.3. Analysis of Variance

3.3.1. Methodological Verification

For all deconvoluted spectra (metabolites), ANOVA statistics were performed from which p-values were calculated [49]. The experimental factors included in the ANOVA model are the sampling time point (TP), the storage temperature level (Temp), and the sample processing type (Type). Additionally, we included an interaction term (TP:Temp) that tests for significant differences in time, dependent on the temperature level. The obtained probability (p)-values describe how likely the null hypothesis, meaning no relationship between the variables of interest or no differences between groups, is. The lower the p-value, the lower the probability of the null hypothesis being true. All p-values are summarized in a histogram in Figure 3 after multiple-testing correction. A value of <0.05 is usually considered sufficient to reject the null hypothesis [50].
Due to the large sample number, which results in a high statistical power of the test, we obtained significant p-values for most metabolites. It means that the concentration of the compounds is indeed statistically dependent of the variables TP, Temp, Type, and the interaction of TP and Temp, with Type being the most influential factor (largest number of p-values < 0.05 and larger number of p-values < 10−40).
The obtained data in this work correlate different samples (temperature, processing type, storage time) in many variables (metabolites). With this many dimensions, the number of possible combinations of samples increases exponentially. To reduce the dimensionality of the dataset while still preserving the relationship between samples, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed [51]. With this, the interrelations between the samples can be observed in a simple two-dimensional score plot shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4 shows several observations that can be considered first indicators for the differences in the truffle aromas during the storage experiment. All samples treated with NaCl are clustered together and are clearly separated from other samples (marked with A). Within these samples, frozen samples are closely grouped together, indicating only small differences among them, while longer stored samples of refrigerated and room temperature samples trend towards lower PC1 and higher PC2 values. The longest stored room temperature samples appear to be most distant from the samples measured at the beginning of the experiment.
Similarly, the blanched samples are also grouped together (B). However, there is no time-based pattern visible. Longer stored samples do appear further away from samples at day 0 but do not follow a specific direction. Warmer stored samples do move further away with storage time than colder stored samples.
Sliced and intact piece samples are clustered closer together than the other types of samples. A clear area separation between them is not possible. Time-based patterns are not very clear either. There is, however, a rough separation between the storage time dependent vectors of frozen (C) and refrigerated as well as room temperature (D) samples. There are, however, some outliers to this pattern.
Additionally, the plot reveals an estimate of the reproducibility of replicated samples. Generally, they are close together, which indicates good reproducibility. Only occasionally, they are farther apart, most likely due to inconsistencies within the truffle samples.

3.3.2. Interpretation of Trajectories for Identified Compounds

Delving deeper into the data, several compounds showed correlations of their peak intensity levels with the variables temperature, time, and processing type. To investigate this further, plots were created that show the progression of the peak intensities with the variables. Plots for all peaks are published online (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10886445, accessed on 1 March 2024). Figure 5 shows a set of behaviors that were observed in multiple compounds. Note that the y-axis is scaled logarithmically and not normalized. Values can only be compared over samples within a metabolite. To this end, a difference of one unit on the y-axis represents a relative 10-fold increase. To give an example, in Figure 5B, maximum levels of 6 (equal to 106 intensity) are found for early time points which decrease to levels of 3 (equal to 103 intensity) after 10 days, indicating a 1000-fold decrease in measured levels for this metabolite.
Plot A of formic acid, 1-methylpropyl ester, shows an overall decrease in this compound with storage time. The decrease is also strongest for room temperature stored samples and weakest for frozen samples. Plot B shows a similar behavior for 2-methyl-1-propanal, with the levels for frozen samples being roughly stable. A similar behavior was observed for 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol, isopropyl formate, 1-(methylthio)-propane, 1-chloro-2-methylbutane, isopropyl formate, propanal, 2-methylbutanal, methanethiol, 2-methylbutyl formate, ethyl formate, and 2-butanol. In some cases, like for 1,3-dimethylbenzene, shown in Plot C, but also p-xylene, ethylbenzene, isobutyl nitrite, 1-propanol and 3-ethylanisole, the processing type played a bigger role than the storage temperature. Here, the decrease was weakest in the blanched samples. A decrease with storage time regardless of storage temperature and condition was observed for 3-octanol, 3-methylphenol, and 2-ethylphenol.
An increase in the aroma compound with time and temperature could also be observed in some cases. Plot D shows this exemplarily for 3-methylfuran. Similar plots were observed for phenyl ethyl ketone, pyrazine, methylpyrazine, 2-dodecanone, 4-heptanone, 1-phenyl-1-pentanone, 2,3-dimethyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one, 2-ethyl-6-methyl-pyrazine, and 2-methylbutanoic acid methyl ester. A more unusual progression can be seen for tetrahydrofuran (plot E). While the amount of tetrahydrofuran increases in the frozen samples, an initial small increase and then a decrease after day 4 were seen for room temperature and fridge stored samples. Nonanal (plot F) showed to be stable until day 8. Only after this time point, a decrease was visible for room temperature and fridge samples, while frozen samples remained stable.
Within the numerous compounds that were identified, there were also some that were mostly stable regarding all variables. Figure 6 plot A shows this for 4-hydroxy-2-pentanone. The plots for anisole, methyl isobutyl ketone, and benzaldehyde showed a similar progression. The only compound that showed an initial decrease followed by an increase was naphthalene (plot B).
That the blanching of truffles can have a great impact on their storage ability can be seen in plots C (formic acid butyl ester) and D (2,4-dimethylanisole). In plot C, the blanching ensured the immediate absence of the compound, while in plot D, it ensured the stability of the compounds over time and temperature.
Plot E shows methyl alcohol. It was the only compound that showed an increase in the fridge and freezer samples over time but not at room temperature. 3-phenylfuran in plot F showed stronger effects for increased temperatures and an initial increase, followed by a decrease after day 8.
The compounds which variance correlated strongest with the processing types are depicted in Figure 7. There were some that were only present in the NaCl-treated samples like 1-chloropentane, (plot A), or are much higher in NaCl-treated samples like 3-methyl-2-butanol, (plot B). The effect was less prevalent in frozen samples. Other compounds that showed similar plots were 3-methylformamide, tributyl phosphate, 1-chloroheptane, isobutyl valerate, 1-chlorobutane, 2-methylbutyl hexanoate, isobutyl hexanoate, propyl hexanoate, 2-chloro-3-methylbutane, 4-ethyl-3-nonen-5-yne, 2-methylbutanoic acid, 3-Octen-2-one-pentyl ester, (E)-2-heptenal, 2-methylpentyl isobutyrate, pentanal, 2-ethyl-2-hexenal, 2-ethyl- 4-pentenal, and hexanoic acid.
Fewer compounds showed a correlation with blanching. 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butanone (plot C) and 2-methyl-2-Pentanol were the only ones that were present in blanched samples but not or almost not in all other samples. On the other hand, the blanching led to a significantly lower concentration for 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-methylbenzene (plot D), 1,2,3-trimethoxybenzene, Hexyl 2-butenoate, Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-methyl-, and 3,4-Dimethoxytoluene.
A correlation with both NaCl treatment and blanching was present for Hexanal, 3-methyl- (plot E), 1-Pentanol, Acetylacetone, formic acid, hexyl ester and 1-Hexanol. For these, the concentration was higher in NaCl samples and lower in blanched samples. A higher amount for both treatments was observed for 2,3-Butanedione, 3-Penten-2-one, 3-methyl- and 2-Butenal, 2-ethyl-. The only compound with a lower concentration for NaCl samples was indane (plot F).
Volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) are a class of aroma substances that are more specific to truffles. In the literature, these are described to be important for the overall aroma perception in humans and animals and are related to biological processes during their maturation. Therefore, special attention was paid to them in this study.
Dimethyl sulfide, one of the most frequently found VSCs in truffles, shows an overall decrease in its intensity over time (Figure 8A). A similar trend was noticeable for dimethyl sulfoxide, methanthiol, 1-(methylthio)-propane, 2-(methylthio)-ethanol, and 2,4-dithiapenthane.
Slightly elevated levels in NaCl samples, but a mostly stable progression in regard to the storage time, was found for 2-methyl-thiazole (plot B) and 2-methyl-thiophene. A decrease after day 8 for room temperature and fridge samples was observable for methional (plot C). The oxidized form of dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfone (plot D), showed mostly stable levels with only some variance at longer storage durations. A significantly lower intensity for sliced and pieced room temperature and fridge samples over the entire storage time was visible for dimethyl trisulfide.

3.4. Enrichment and Pathway Analysis

Although these results already simplified the vast amount of data collected, there are still pieces of information in these kinds of datasets that are hard to manually analyze. Of particular interest in this case is the correlation of compound data with their biological functions. For this purpose, the software MetaboAnalyst 6.0 was used to investigate the enrichment of relevant metabolites in chemical classes and metabolic pathways. Because we are interested in time-dependent metabolic changes, relevant metabolites were defined as showing a statistically significant difference according to time, internally calculated as an ANOVA p-value by MetaboAnalyst (cf. Methods) [52,53].
Exemplary, the enrichment analysis of sliced samples divided by storage temperatures is shown in Figure 9. The enrichment ratios are shown as circle sizes, and the p-values are color-graded.
The aroma of truffles may be produced by truffles themselves or by the microbial community that colonizes them, made up of bacteria, yeasts, guest filamentous fungi, and viruses [14,54]. Since a metabolite library for either truffles (tuber) or a truffle-specific microbial community was not available, the enrichment set was classified by main chemical classes for this analysis.
From Figure 9, the enrichment of compounds varies with the temperature. Organosulfur compounds like thioethers, thiophenes, or sulfonyls are enriched to a greater extend with decreasing temperature. The same is true for organooxygen compounds. At room temperature, benzene and substituted derivatives, fatty acyls, and heteroaromatic compounds are more enriched than at lower temperatures. Noticeable is that N-containing compounds like azoles seem to be enriched at all storage conditions. Phenols, phenol ethers, and tetrahydrofurans are among the least-enriched compounds overall.
In Figure 10, the top enriched metabolites in fridge stored samples are shown.
Proceeding from piece samples, all other treatments seem to result in a greater enrichment of some sulfur-containing compounds. For sliced samples, these compounds are thiols and thioethers; for NaCl samples, they are thioacetals sulfonyls and thiols; and for blanched samples, the most-enriched s-compounds are thiols and thioethers. Compared to that, the most-enriched S-compounds in piece samples are sulfoxide. There are also differences among the other chemical structure classes between the sample types, but a clear pattern is not emerging.
To gain insight into what the enrichment of compounds means for the biological processes occurring in the stored truffe samples, a pathway analysis was run. In Figure 11, the results for sliced samples stored in the fridge are shown as an example. The analysis was run against the metabolomic pathway library of Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 as a model bacterium. This was performed since no library for truffles or truffles specific bacteria was available.
On the left, the logarithmic p-value vs. the pathway impact plot is shown. The highest p-value observed was for the pyruvate and/or glycolysis pathway. The pyruvate pathway is also depicted in Figure 10. The compounds that participate in both pathways are ethanol (C00469), acetaldehyde (C00084), and acetate (C00033). Although there are some enriched compounds that are part of other pathways, only two or less of the identified compounds take part in these. Therefore, the pathway impact shown here is not very reliable. This is to be expected, since these data stem from GC–MS measurements, and the libraries were mostly carried out with/for LC–MS analyses. The only other pathway that was impacted by multiple enriched compounds is the sulfur metabolism. Dimethyl sulfone (C1142), acetate (C1143), dimethyl sulfoxide (C00580), and dimethyl sulfone (C00033) take part in this metabolism.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

The presented data showcase the influence of different factors on the aroma of truffles. While pre-storage processing methods that target the enzymatic activity or heat treatments can alter the aroma of truffles fundamentally, the surface area of truffle samples also plays some role in the storability. The approach of this work was to examine the influence of treatment methods, storage times, storage temperatures, and their interactive effects on individual aroma compounds that make up the aroma of Tuber melanosporum.
Tracking the changes in the aroma, 695 compounds could be identified which concentrations varied throughout the experiment. These comprise far more compounds than other studies, which mainly focusing on the aroma profiling at a given point in time had previously found. This emphasizes the complexity of processes happening in truffles regarding different factors.
The results can be used to further develop the understanding of truffles and for different applications. Principle component analyses of aroma profiles may give a first and simple insight into the truffle constitution. Individual compounds in the truffle aroma could be utilized to comprehend the treatment samples underwent in the past.
The content of formic acid, 1-methylpropyl ester, may be used to determine the overall age of Tuber melanosporum samples as this compound’s concentration decreases with time. 2-Methyl-1-propanal, 1-(methylthio)-propane, or 2,4-dimethylanisole may be considered more as freshness markers as their decrease is weakened with a decrease in storage temperature. Increased levels of tetrahydrofuran can indicate that a truffle was frozen at one point. The presence of 1-chloropentane can be used to reconstruct the contact or treatment with salt, while 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butanone may indicate a previous heat treatment.
Also, the information about time- and temperature-stable concentrations of, for example, 4-hydroxy-2-pentanone and dimethyl trisulfide may be utilized in future works to correlate with similar information about other truffle species.
Compounds found often in truffle literature like 3-methylbutanal, 2-butanone, 1-octen-3-ol, 2-butenal, acetaldehyde, 3-methyl-1-butanol, and 3-octanol could also be identified in this study but showed no interesting progression in their concentration. Others like 2-methylbutanal, 3-methyl-1-butanal, anisole, or 6-methyl-2-heptanol were not found here.
In comparison to other studies mentioned in the Introduction, a strong alteration of truffles after freezing, but comparably well preservation by heat treatment, could not be confirmed in this study. This study tends to agree with those who found any heat treatment to have a strong effect on the aroma of truffles. On the other hand, markers for freshness such as dimethyl sulfide and others could be confirmed. It was further found that a treatment with NaCl had the strongest effect on the aroma profile of Tuber melanosporum.
Since the focus of this work, as well as the authors’ knowledge and abilities, are limited, we provide all collected data for others to use (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10886445, accessed on 1 March 2024). This could for example open the possibility of a more in-depth interpretation of the collected data based on biological processes. As an example, we provided a metabolite enrichment and pathway analysis of some of the samples. This is a way to identify biologically meaningful patterns that are significantly enriched. This approach directly investigates if a set of functionally related metabolites are significantly enriched without the need to manually preselect compounds based on an arbitrary cut-off threshold. It has the potential to identify subtle but consistent changes among a group of related compounds. From the results, it is again clearer that sulfur compounds play an important role in the truffle aroma. Significant differences in their enrichment at different storage temperatures and different sample treatments could be observed.
The impact of some of the enriched compounds on metabolic pathways could be observed. Although the analysis was limited by the accessible metabolomic libraries, others with a better understanding and knowledge in this field could potentially gain much more information on biological processes from data collected in this study.
Overall, the results show how different factors like temperature and sample treatment methods impact the aroma of Tuber melanosporum over an extended storage time. Markers for these factors could be identified. The correlation of the collected data with biological processes showed to be promising for the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.E.; methodology, R.E. and J.L.; validation, M.K.; formal analysis, J.L. and R.E.; investigation, J.L. and R.E.; resources, M.K.; data curation, J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, R.E. and J.L.; writing—review and editing, R.E. and M.K.; supervision, M.K.; project administration, M.K.; funding acquisition, R.E. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by funds from the German Government’s Special Purpose Fund held at the Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank (Grant Number: 925 487).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are openly available in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10886445, accessed on 5 March 2024.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ute Dorgerloh for giving us the opportunity to perform the GC–MS measurements and Sebastian Mark for his help with the sample preparations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. List of all samples prepared for storage.
Table A1. List of all samples prepared for storage.
Sample
Nummer
Storage
Temperature
Processing
Type
Storage TimeRepetition
1TKS01
2TKS02
3TKB01
4TKB02
5TKSA01
6TKSA02
7TKBL01
8TKBL02
9RTS01
10RTS02
11RTB01
12RTB02
13RTSA01
14RTSA02
15RTBL01
16RTBL02
17KSS01
18KSS02
19KSB01
20KSB02
21KSSA01
22KSSA02
23KSBL01
24KSBL02
25TKS21
26TKS22
27TKB21
28TKB22
29TKSA21
30TKSA22
31TKBL21
32TKBL22
33RTS21
34RTS22
35RTB21
36RTB22
37RTSA21
38RTSA22
39RTBL21
40RTBL22
41KSS21
42KSS22
43KSB21
44KSB22
45KSSA21
46KSSA22
47KSBL21
48KSBL22
49TKS41
50TKS42
51TKB41
52TKB42
53TKSA41
54TKSA42
55TKBL41
56TKBL42
57RTS41
58RTS42
59RTB41
60RTB42
61RTSA41
62RTSA42
63RTBL41
64RTBL42
65KSS41
66KSS42
67KSB41
68KSB42
69KSSA41
70KSSA42
71KSBL41
72KSBL42
73TKS61
74TKS62
75TKB61
76TKB62
77TKSA61
78TKSA62
79TKBL61
80TKBL62
81RTS61
82RTS62
83RTB61
84RTB62
85RTSA61
86RTSA62
87RTBL61
88RTBL62
89KSS61
90KSS62
91KSB61
92KSB62
93KSSA61
94KSSA62
95KSBL61
96KSBL62
97TKS81
98TKS82
99TKB81
100TKB82
101TKSA81
102TKSA82
103TKBL81
104TKBL82
105RTS81
106RTS82
107RTB81
108RTB82
109RTSA81
110RTSA82
111RTBL81
112RTBL82
113KSS81
114KSS82
115KSB81
116KSB82
117KSSA81
118KSSA82
119KSBL81
120KSBL82
121TKS101
122TKS102
123TKB101
124TKB102
125TKSA101
126TKSA102
127TKBL101
128TKBL102
129RTS101
130RTS102
131RTB101
132RTB102
133RTSA101
134RTSA102
135RTBL101
136RTBL102
137KSS101
138KSS102
139KSB101
140KSB102
141KSSA101
142KSSA102
143KSBL101
144KSBL102
145TKS121
146TKS122
147TKB121
148TKB122
149TKSA121
150TKSA122
151TKBL121
152TKBL122
153RTS121
154RTS122
155RTB121
156RTB122
157RTSA121
158RTSA122
159RTBL121
160RTBL122
161KSS121
162KSS122
163KSB121
164KSB122
165KSSA121
166KSSA122
167KSBL121
168KSBL122
Figure A1. Alignment results of the MS-DIAL deconvolution process. All peaks (top) and identified peaks (bottom) in comparison with NIST library.
Figure A1. Alignment results of the MS-DIAL deconvolution process. All peaks (top) and identified peaks (bottom) in comparison with NIST library.
Jof 10 00354 g0a1

References

  1. Vidale, E. Truffles: The Precious Mushroom. In Poverty Reduction Through Non-Timber Forest Products; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 79–81. [Google Scholar]
  2. Splivallo, R.; Deveau, A.; Valdez, N.; Kirchhoff, N.; Frey-Klett, P.; Karlovsky, P. Bacteria associated with truffle-fruiting bodies contribute to truffle aroma. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 2647–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Streiblova, E.; Gryndlerova, H.; Gryndler, M. Truffle brûlé: An efficient fungal life strategy. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 80, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Niimi, J.; Deveau, A.; Splivallo, R. Geographical based variations in white truffle Tuber magnatum truffle aroma is explained by quantitative differences in key volatile compounds. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 1623–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Čejka, T.; Trnka, M.; Krusic, P.J.; Stobbe, U.; Oliach, D.; Václavík, T.; Tegel, W.; Büntgen, U. Predicted climate change will increase the truffle cultivation potential in central Europe. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bruhn, J.; Hall, M. Burgundy Black Truffle Cultivation in an Agroforestry Practice; University of Missouri Extension: Columbia, MO, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. Culleré, L.; Ferreira, V.; Marco, P.; Venturini, M.E.; Blanco, D. Does the host tree exert any influence on the aromatic composition of the black truffle (Tuber melanosporum)? Flavour Fragr. J. 2017, 32, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bohannon, J. Gourmet food, served by dogs. Science 2009, 323, 1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Talou, T.; Gaset, A.; Delmas, M.; Kulifaj, M.; Montant, C. Dimethyl sulphide: The secret for black truffle hunting by animals? Mycol. Res. 1990, 94, 277–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Samils, N.; Olivera, A.; Danell, E.; Alexander, S.J.; Fischer, C.; Colinas, C. The socioeconomic impact of truffle cultivation in rural Spain. Econ. Bot. 2008, 62, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lefevre, C. Native and cultivated truffles of North America. In Edible Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 209–226. [Google Scholar]
  12. Reyna, S.; Garcia-Barreda, S. Black truffle cultivation: A global reality. For. Syst. 2014, 23, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thomas, P.; Büntgen, U. First harvest of Périgord black truffle in the UK as a result of climate change. Clim. Res. 2017, 74, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Splivallo, R.; Ottonello, S.; Mello, A.; Karlovsky, P. Truffle volatiles: From chemical ecology to aroma biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 688–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Strojnik, L.; Grebenc, T.; Ogrinc, N. Species and geographic variability in truffle aromas. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 142, 111434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mustafa, A.M.; Angeloni, S.; Nzekoue, F.K.; Abouelenein, D.; Sagratini, G.; Caprioli, G.; Torregiani, E. An Overview on Truffle Aroma and Main Volatile Compounds. Molecules 2020, 25, 5948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Torregiani, E.; Lorier, S.; Sagratini, G.; Maggi, F.; Vittori, S.; Caprioli, G. Comparative analysis of the volatile profile of 20 commercial samples of truffles, truffle sauces, and truffle-flavored oils by using HS-SPME-GC-MS. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 1857–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schmidberger, P.C.; Schieberle, P. Characterization of the key aroma compounds in white Alba truffle (Tuber magnatum pico) and Burgundy truffle (Tuber uncinatum) by means of the sensomics approach. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2017, 65, 9287–9296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Feng, T.; Chen, W.; Liu, T. Identification of volatile flavour components of Tuber melanosporum using simultaneous distillation-extraction. Czech J. Food Sci. 2017, 35, 483–487. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, N.; Chen, H.; Sun, B.; Mao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y. Comparative Analysis of Volatile Composition in Chinese Truffles via GC× GC/HR-TOF/MS and Electronic Nose. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Vita, F.; Taiti, C.; Pompeiano, A.; Bazihizina, N.; Lucarotti, V.; Mancuso, S.; Alpi, A. Volatile organic compounds in truffle (Tuber magnatum Pico): Comparison of samples from different regions of Italy and from different seasons. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Costa, R.; Fanali, C.; Pennazza, G.; Tedone, L.; Dugo, L.; Santonico, M.; Sciarrone, D.; Cacciola, F.; Cucchiarini, L.; Dachà, M. Screening of volatile compounds composition of white truffle during storage by GCxGC-(FID/MS) and gas sensor array analyses. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 905–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pacioni, G.; Cerretani, L.; Procida, G.; Cichelli, A. Composition of commercial truffle flavored oils with GC–MS analysis and discrimination with an electronic nose. Food Chem. 2014, 146, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gioacchini, A.M.; Menotta, M.; Bertini, L.; Rossi, I.; Zeppa, S.; Zambonelli, A.; Piccoli, G.; Stocchi, V. Solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: A new method for species identification of truffles. Rapid Commun. MassSpectrom. Int. J. Devoted Rapid Dissem. Up-to-the-Minute Res. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 19, 2365–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mauriello, G.; Marino, R.; D’Auria, M.; Cerone, G.; Rana, G.L. Determination of volatile organic compounds from truffles via SPME-GC-MS. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2004, 42, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Déléris, I.; Saint-Eve, A.; Sémon, E.; Guillemin, H.; Guichard, E.; Souchon, I.; Le Quéré, J.L. Comparison of direct mass spectrometry methods for the on-line analysis of volatile compounds in foods. J. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 48, 594–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Biasioli, F.; Gasperi, F.; Yeretzian, C.; Märk, T.D. PTR-MS monitoring of VOCs and BVOCs in food science and technology. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2011, 30, 968–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aprea, E.; Biasioli, F.; Carlin, S.; Versini, G.; Märk, T.D.; Gasperi, F. Rapid white truffle headspace analysis by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry and comparison with solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. MassSpectrom. Int. J. Devoted Rapid Dissem. Up-to-the-Minute Res. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 21, 2564–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zeppa, G.; Gerbi, V. Using an “electronic nose” to discriminate white truffle (Tuber magnatum Pico) quality. Sci. Aliment. 2001, 21, 683. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zampioglou, D.; Kalomiros, J. Design and testing of an electronic nose sensitive to the aroma of Truffles. In Advanced Data Acquisition and Intelligent Data Processing; River Publishers: Gistrup, Denmark, 2014; pp. 59–80. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zampioglou, D.; Kalomiros, J. An Electronic Nose System Sensitive to the Aroma of Ascomycete Tuber. Sens. Transducers 2015, 187, 23. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mello, A.; Murat, C.; Bonfante, P. Truffles: Much more than a prized and local fungal delicacy. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 260, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tejedor-Calvo, E.; García-Barreda, S.; Felices-Mayordomo, M.; Blanco, D.; Sánchez, S.; Marco, P. Truffle flavored commercial products veracity and sensory analysis from truffle and non-truffle consumers. Food Control 2023, 145, 109424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Patel, S. Food, health and agricultural importance of truffles. Curr. Trends Biotechnol. Pharm. 2012, 6, 15–27. [Google Scholar]
  35. Šiškovič, N.; Strojnik, L.; Grebenc, T.; Vidrih, R.; Ogrinc, N. Differentiation between species and regional origin of fresh and freeze-dried truffles according to their volatile profiles. Food Control 2021, 123, 107698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Phong, W.N.; Chang, S.; Payne, A.D.; Dykes, G.A.; Coorey, R. Microbiological evaluation of whole, sliced, and freeze-dried black truffles (Tuber melanosporum) under vacuum packaging and refrigerator storage. JSFA Rep. 2022, 2, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Campo, E.; Marco, P.; Oria, R.; Blanco, D.; Venturini, M.E. What is the best method for preserving the genuine black truffle (Tuber melanosporum) aroma? An olfactometric and sensory approach. LWT 2017, 80, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Longo, E.; Morozova, K.; Loizzo, M.R.; Tundis, R.; Savini, S.; Foligni, R.; Mozzon, M.; Martin-Vertedor, D.; Scampicchio, M.; Boselli, E. High resolution mass approach to characterize refrigerated black truffles stored under different storage atmospheres. Food Res. Int. 2017, 102, 526–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Savini, S.; Loizzo, M.R.; Tundis, R.; Mozzon, M.; Foligni, R.; Longo, E.; Morozova, K.; Scampicchio, M.; Martin-Vertedor, D.; Boselli, E. Fresh refrigerated Tuber melanosporum truffle: Effect of the storage conditions on the antioxidant profile, antioxidant activity and volatile profile. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 2255–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vahdatzadeh, M.; Deveau, A.; Splivallo, R. Are bacteria responsible for aroma deterioration upon storage of the black truffle Tuber aestivum: A microbiome and volatilome study. Food Microbiol. 2019, 84, 103251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Savini, S.; Longo, E.; Servili, A.; Murolo, S.; Mozzon, M.; Romanazzi, G.; Boselli, E. Hypobaric packaging prolongs the shelf life of refrigerated black truffles (Tuber melanosporum). Molecules 2020, 25, 3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Choo, K.S.; Bollen, M.; Dykes, G.A.; Coorey, R. Aroma-volatile profile and its changes in Australian grown black Périgord truffle (Tuber melanosporum) during storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 5762–5776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Niimi, J.; Deveau, A.; Splivallo, R. Aroma and bacterial communities dramatically change with storage of fresh white truffle Tuber magnatum. LWT 2021, 151, 112125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Phong, W.N.; Gibberd, M.R.; Payne, A.D.; Dykes, G.A.; Coorey, R. Methods used for extraction of plant volatiles have potential to preserve truffle aroma: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 1677–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tejedor-Calvo, E.; Morales, D.; Sanz, M.Á.; Sánchez, S.; Marco, P.; García-Barreda, S. Aromatic changes in home-made truffle products after heat treatments. Food Res. Int. 2023, 164, 112403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jaeger, C.; Lisec, J. Statistical and multivariate analysis of MS-based plant metabolomics data. In Plant Metabolomics Methods Protoc; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 285–296. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsugawa, H.; Cajka, T.; Kind, T.; Ma, Y.; Higgins, B.; Ikeda, K.; Kanazawa, M.; VanderGheynst, J.; Fiehn, O.; Arita, M. MS-DIAL: Data-independent MS/MS deconvolution for comprehensive metabolome analysis. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 523–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kind, T.; Tsugawa, H.; Cajka, T.; Ma, Y.; Lai, Z.; Mehta, S.S.; Wohlgemuth, G.; Barupal, D.K.; Showalter, M.R.; Arita, M. Identification of small molecules using accurate mass MS/MS search. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2018, 37, 513–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. St, L.; Wold, S. Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1989, 6, 259–272. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pietraszek, J.; Kołomycki, M.; Szczotok, A.; Dwornicka, R. The fuzzy approach to assessment of ANOVA results. In Proceedings of the Computational Collective Intelligence: 8th International Conference, ICCCI 2016, Halkidiki, Greece, 28–30 September 2016; Proceedings, Part I 8. pp. 260–268. [Google Scholar]
  51. Jackson, J.E. A User’s Guide to Principal Components; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pang, Z.; Zhou, G.; Ewald, J.; Chang, L.; Hacariz, O.; Basu, N.; Xia, J. Using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 for LC–HRMS spectra processing, multi-omics integration and covariate adjustment of global metabolomics data. Nat. Protoc. 2022, 17, 1735–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Qiu, S.; Cai, Y.; Yao, H.; Lin, C.; Xie, Y.; Tang, S.; Zhang, A. Small molecule metabolites: Discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Vahdatzadeh, M.; Deveau, A.; Splivallo, R. The role of the microbiome of truffles in aroma formation: A meta-analysis approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 6946–6952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Typical (HS)SPME/GC–MS total ion chromatogram of Tuber melanosporum.
Figure 1. Typical (HS)SPME/GC–MS total ion chromatogram of Tuber melanosporum.
Jof 10 00354 g001
Figure 2. Retention time vs. retention index plot for measured RI and reference from the literature.
Figure 2. Retention time vs. retention index plot for measured RI and reference from the literature.
Jof 10 00354 g002
Figure 3. p-value histograms for dependence on time point (TP), temperature, processing type (condition), and both TP and temperature. (Top): linear, (Bottom): logarithmic scale. p-values are multiple-testing-corrected using the method of Benjamini–Hochberg (BH).
Figure 3. p-value histograms for dependence on time point (TP), temperature, processing type (condition), and both TP and temperature. (Top): linear, (Bottom): logarithmic scale. p-values are multiple-testing-corrected using the method of Benjamini–Hochberg (BH).
Jof 10 00354 g003
Figure 4. Principal component analysis of stored truffle samples. Storage time (d) is indicated by numbers. Storage temperatures of room temperature, fridge, and freezer are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.
Figure 4. Principal component analysis of stored truffle samples. Storage time (d) is indicated by numbers. Storage temperatures of room temperature, fridge, and freezer are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.
Jof 10 00354 g004
Figure 5. Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for formic acid, 1-methylpropyl ester (A), 2-methylpropanal (B), 1,3-dimethylbenzene (C), 3-methylfuran (D), Tetrahydrofuran (E), and Nonanal (F). Storage temperatures of room temperature, fridge, and freezer are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols. To allow easier comparison between groups, lines colored according to temperature levels connect replicate means per time point. Additionally, samples for each time point have been shifted slightly on the x-axis according to the applied processing type. Plot annotations provide information on retention time (RT), ion mass (mz), sum formula, peak ID, and the p-values obtained in an ANOVA with 3 factors.
Figure 5. Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for formic acid, 1-methylpropyl ester (A), 2-methylpropanal (B), 1,3-dimethylbenzene (C), 3-methylfuran (D), Tetrahydrofuran (E), and Nonanal (F). Storage temperatures of room temperature, fridge, and freezer are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols. To allow easier comparison between groups, lines colored according to temperature levels connect replicate means per time point. Additionally, samples for each time point have been shifted slightly on the x-axis according to the applied processing type. Plot annotations provide information on retention time (RT), ion mass (mz), sum formula, peak ID, and the p-values obtained in an ANOVA with 3 factors.
Jof 10 00354 g005
Figure 6. Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for 4-hydroxy-2-pentanone (A), naphthalene (B), formic acid, butyl ester (C), 2,4-dimethylanisole (D), methanol (E), and 3-phenylfuran (F). Storage temperatures of room temperature, fridge, and freezer are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.
Figure 6. Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for 4-hydroxy-2-pentanone (A), naphthalene (B), formic acid, butyl ester (C), 2,4-dimethylanisole (D), methanol (E), and 3-phenylfuran (F). Storage temperatures of room temperature, fridge, and freezer are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.
Jof 10 00354 g006
Figure 7. Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for 1-chloropentane (A), 3-methyl-2-butanol (B), 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butanone (C), 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-methylbenzene (D), 3-methylhexanal (E), and indane (F). Storage temperatures of room temperature, fridge, and freezer are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.
Figure 7. Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for 1-chloropentane (A), 3-methyl-2-butanol (B), 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butanone (C), 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-methylbenzene (D), 3-methylhexanal (E), and indane (F). Storage temperatures of room temperature, fridge, and freezer are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.
Jof 10 00354 g007
Figure 8. Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for dimethyl sulfide (A), 2-methylthiazole (B), methional (C), dimethyl sulfone (D), and dimethyl trisulfide (E). Storage temperatures of room temperature, fridge, and freezer are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.
Figure 8. Progression of peak intensity (logarithmic scale) vs. storage time (in days) for dimethyl sulfide (A), 2-methylthiazole (B), methional (C), dimethyl sulfone (D), and dimethyl trisulfide (E). Storage temperatures of room temperature, fridge, and freezer are indicated by colors. Processing types sliced (●), piece (■), with NaCl (◆), and blanched (▲) are indicated by symbols.
Jof 10 00354 g008
Figure 9. Top enriched metabolites by main chemical class in sliced samples, divided by storage temperature.
Figure 9. Top enriched metabolites by main chemical class in sliced samples, divided by storage temperature.
Jof 10 00354 g009
Figure 10. Top enriched metabolites by main chemical class in fridge samples, divided by treatment method.
Figure 10. Top enriched metabolites by main chemical class in fridge samples, divided by treatment method.
Jof 10 00354 g010
Figure 11. Pathway analysis of room temperature sliced samples and selected metabolite pathways that include more than 2 identified compounds.
Figure 11. Pathway analysis of room temperature sliced samples and selected metabolite pathways that include more than 2 identified compounds.
Jof 10 00354 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Epping, R.; Lisec, J.; Koch, M. Changes in Black Truffle (Tuber melanosporum) Aroma during Storage under Different Conditions. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050354

AMA Style

Epping R, Lisec J, Koch M. Changes in Black Truffle (Tuber melanosporum) Aroma during Storage under Different Conditions. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(5):354. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050354

Chicago/Turabian Style

Epping, Ruben, Jan Lisec, and Matthias Koch. 2024. "Changes in Black Truffle (Tuber melanosporum) Aroma during Storage under Different Conditions" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 5: 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050354

APA Style

Epping, R., Lisec, J., & Koch, M. (2024). Changes in Black Truffle (Tuber melanosporum) Aroma during Storage under Different Conditions. Journal of Fungi, 10(5), 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050354

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop