Open AccessArticle

Functional Identification of Salt-Stress-Related Genes Using the FOX Hunting System from Ipomoea pes-caprae

Mei Zhang

^1,2,*

Hui Zhang

^1,2,3,

Jie-Xuan Zheng

^1,2,3,

Hui Mo

^1,2,

Kuai-Fei Xia

^1,2 and

Shu-Guang Jian

^1,*

Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China

Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China

University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China

Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(11), 3446; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113446

Submission received: 28 July 2018 / Revised: 9 October 2018 / Accepted: 31 October 2018 / Published: 2 November 2018

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ion Transporters and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants)

Download

Browse Figures

Figure 1
Na+ (A) and K+ (B) contents in I. pes-caprae collected from five different areas in Guangdong province. SW: sample from Shanwei (22°47′10.97″ N, 115°10′22.83″ E); SZ: sample from Shenzhen (22°32′13.16″ N, 114°29′11.26″ E); HZ: sample from Huizhou (22°41′24.81″ N, 114°44′48.02″ E); YJ: sample from Yangjiang (21°34′37.34″ N, 111°52′15.95″ E); SCBG: sample from South China Botanical Garden (23°18′49.89″ N, 113°35′84.32″ E). An Arabidopsis sample is also shown as a glycophyte control. All experiments were carried out for three replicates. The results shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3). "> Figure 2
(A) The habitats of I. pes-caprae. This pictures were taken at the beach of Zhaoshu Island (16°58′ N, 112°16′ E) on 23 August 2016; (B) Analysis and detection of total RNA extracted from I. pes-caprae by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis; (C) Analysis and detection of mRNA purified from total RNA extracted from I. pes-caprae by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis; (D) Titer and inserted fragment detection of the entry cDNA library by colony PCR; (E) Titer and inserted fragment detection of the expression cDNA library by colony PCR. "> Figure 3
Salinity-tolerance confirmations in the yeast salt-sensitive mutant AXT3 of 38 clones (IpSR1 to 38) via library screening from I. pes-caprae. The yeast cultures (OD600 to 2) were serially diluted to OD600 values of 0.2, 0.02, and 0.002, and then 2 μL of yeast liquid was spotted onto SDG-Ura (supplied with adenine for AXT3) plates with or without NaCl (0, 50, 75, and 200 mM NaCl) for 5–10 days. The empty vector pYES2 represents the negative control. "> Figure 4
Salinity-tolerance confirmations in yeast wild-type strain W303 of 38 clones (IpSR1 to 38) via library screening from I. pes-caprae. The yeast culture (OD600 to 2) was serially diluted to OD600 values of 0.2, 0.02, and 0.002, and then 2 μL of yeast liquid was spotted onto SDG-Ura (supplied with adenine/leucine/histidine/tryptophan for W303) plates with (0.85, 1.28, and 1.5 M NaCl) or without NaCl for 5–10 days at 30 °C. The empty vector pYES2 represents negative control. "> Figure 5
The oxidative resistance test of seven IpSR cDNAs (IpSR1, IpSR14, IpSR18, IpSR19, IpSR26, IpSR33, and IpSR38) overexpressed in the yeast mutant yap1Δ (A) and skn7Δ (B). The yeast culture (OD600 to 2) was serially diluted to OD600 values of 0.2, 0.02, and 0.002, and then 2 μL of yeast liquid was spotted onto SDG-Ura plates without or with H2O2 (0.25 mM and 0.5 mM) for 5–10 days at 30 °C. As a negative control, the mutant strain yap1Δ was transformed with the empty vector pYES2. As a positive control, wild-type yeast BY4741 (WT) was transformed with the empty vector pYES2. "> Figure 6
RT-PCR analyses of seven salinity-tolerant candidate genes (IpSR1, IpSR14, IpSR18, IpSR19, IpSR26, IpSR33, and IpSR38) in the roots, vines, and leaves of I. pes-caprae seedlings under salinity (left, 300 mM NaCl) and osmotic (right, 300 mM mannitol) stresses at 0 and 24 h. The house-keeping gene IpUBQ (GenBank accession number: MF502417) was used as a reference gene. All determinations were carried out for three biological replicates. The results shown are the mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). * and ** indicate significant differences in comparison with the wild type at 0.01 < p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively (Student’s t-test). ">

Versions Notes

Abstract

Ipomoea pes-caprae is a seashore halophytic plant and is therefore a good model for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying salt and stress tolerance in plant research. Here, we performed Full-length cDNA Over-eXpressor (FOX) gene hunting with a functional screening of a cDNA library using a salt-sensitive yeast mutant strain to isolate the salt-stress-related genes of I. pes-caprae (IpSR genes). The library was screened for genes that complemented the salt defect of yeast mutant AXT3 and could grow in the presence of 75 mM NaCl. We obtained 38 candidate salt-stress-related full-length cDNA clones from the I. pes-caprae cDNA library. The genes are predicted to encode proteins involved in water deficit, reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, cellular vesicle trafficking, metabolic enzymes, and signal transduction factors. When combined with the quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analyses, several potential functional salt-tolerance-related genes were emphasized. This approach provides a rapid assay system for the large-scale screening of I. pes-caprae genes involved in the salt stress response and supports the identification of genes responsible for the molecular mechanisms of salt tolerance.

Keywords:

salt stress; cDNA library; FOX gene hunting system; ROS accumulation; Ipomoea pes-caprae L.

1. Introduction

Plants are continuously challenged by multiple stresses in nature and are also subjected to the evolutionary pressures imposed by natural selection. Among diverse adversity stresses, salinity is one of growing problems which affect plant growth and agricultural production, and even result in environmental degradation [1,2]. The mechanisms of salinity tolerance in plants have been classified into three types—ion exclusion, osmotic tolerance, and tissue tolerance [3]—or been summarized as osmotic stress and ionic stress [4]. During the various plant processes, several types of key genes are involved in the plant salinity tolerance, mainly by mediating Na⁺/K⁺ absorption, detoxification, and exclusion, and the functional genes mainly include channel proteins, transcription factors, or some metabolic enzymes or protective proteins [4,5].

Based on the adaptability of plants to high salinity, most plants are classified into two categories: glycophytes and halophytes. Compared with glycophytes, halophytes are defined as plants which can naturally survive in a saline environment and even prefer it [6]. Some halophytes that flourish in high-salinity conditions are termed as extremophiles [7]. In the course of evolution, halophytes or extremophiles have developed various adaptive mechanisms responding to salinity to ensure their survival and alternation of generations [8]. Research into halophyte stress-tolerance-related genes would improve the understanding of the adaptation of plants to environmental stress and provide a good foundation for formulating effective measures to modify the tolerance of crops to external stresses [1].

Ipomoea pes-caprae (Convolvulaceae) is a perennial herbaceous vine plant distributing mainly on sandy beaches or in sunny positions on the roadside in tropical and subtropical regions, and usually grows in a high-temperature, dry environment, exhibiting great advantages in salt tolerance and drought resistance [9,10]. As a typical halophyte plant with a high level of nutrient utilization efficiency, I. pes-caprae constitutes a superior wild plant resource and plays important roles in sand fixation, wind resistance, landscape greening, and ecological restoration of the vegetation in tropical and subtropical coral islands and coastal zones [9,11]. In addition, since I. pes-caprae is also a highly adversity-resistant perennial officinal plant with super excellent phenotypes of resistance to abiotic stresses, a molecular biology approach to identification of the stress-tolerant functional genes of this species to extreme environments has great potential for application and significance in plant science.

Salinity is a common abiotic stress that is usually associated with saline/alkali land or sea beaches, and salt accumulation in soil or water can inhibit plant growth and reduce absorption of water, thereby causing osmotic or water-deficit stress in vivo. In both earlier and more recent studies, much research has focused on the “omics” changes induced by external stresses [7,12]. However, due to the lack of genomic information for non-model plant species, the changes in transcriptomic, proteomic, or metabolomic processes caused by stress do not provide sufficient information for the cloning and isolation of stress-related genes in non-model plant species. The Full-length cDNA Over-eXpressor (FOX) gene hunting system is a functional screening method using the overexpression of full-length cDNA libraries in model plants (Arabidopsis or rice) or microorganisms (mainly yeast) [13,14,15,16,17], by which some unknown stress-related genes have been cloned and preliminarily identified. Actually, in much earlier studies, the functional screening work with yeast mutants was widely used to separate salt tolerance genes from plant cDNA libraries due to the lack of any genomic sequence information, even in model plants such as Arabidopsis [18,19], tobacco [20], or rice [21]. Since yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) is a unicellular organism with the best research background, the functional screening of stress-tolerance-related genes in yeast with the FOX gene hunting system seems more simple and easier to operate than in model plants (such as Arabidopsis and rice). In recent years, this gene hunting system has also been widely applied to isolate salt tolerance genes in some extreme halophyte species without any genomic sequence information [15,16,22].

In the present study, we constructed a yeast expression cDNA library and performed functional screening work in order to identify the candidate genes encoding functional proteins involved in salt tolerance in I. pes-caprae. We obtained a preliminary series of candidate genes for increasing the salt tolerance of yeast that can be considered as salt-stress-related functional genes for further research.

2. Results

2.1. The Na⁺ and K⁺ Contents in I. pes-caprae

Figure 1A shows that the concentration of Na⁺ in different tissues of I. pes-caprae collected from four different beaches (Shanwei, SW; Shenzhen, SZ; Huizhou, HZ; Yangjiang, YJ) and South China Botanical Garden (SCBG) in Guangdong province ranged from 1 to 16 mg g⁻¹ dry weight. In general, the aerial parts of I. pes-caprae (leaves) living in beaches contained high amounts of Na⁺ compared with the underground portion (roots) (Figure 1A), while the SCBG sample did not show this salt-enriched feature. Although the Na⁺ content in the vines appeared to be lower than in the leaves or underground portion, if we consider the great biomass contribution from the vines, we can conclude that the aerial part of I. pes-caprae contained the bulk of the Na⁺ absorbed by the roots from the seawater (Figure 2A). As to the K⁺ content, all of the I. pes-caprae samples showed no obvious increase compared with Arabidopsis (Figure 1B), which indicated that the K⁺ might not be the cause of osmotic stress in I. pes-caprae plants in vivo.

Overall, compared with regular glycophytes such as Arabidopsis (Figure 1A), the Na⁺ contents in living plants of I. pes-caprae are much higher, which indicated that I. pes-caprae can accumulate a large amount of saline ions in vivo and has evolved a series of salt-tolerant mechanisms as an adaptive response to high-salt environments in order to lessen or even eliminate osmotic stress and the toxic ions from seawater. Additionally, osmotic stress damage is reduced by the waxy leaf surface and succulency. The vines of I. pes-caprae easily sprout adventitious roots, and the depth of primary roots can reach 3 meters, to make sure the plant gets water with little problem [23]. The above features indicate that I. pes-caprae can easily absorb water and limit the stomata transpiration, and thus possess strong drought tolerance under high temperature and strong light irradiation.

2.2. Construction of the cDNA Expression Library

An investigation of the habitat of I. pes-caprae revealed that it is a halophyte and is therefore associated with high salt tolerance (Figure 2A). For the purpose of isolating genes involved in salt tolerance in I. pes-caprae, a cDNA library was constructed with Gateway technology. Total RNA was separated from mixed samples of actively growing leaves, shoots, and roots of I. pes-caprae. The final amount of RNA was 842 μg with a concentration of 0.9351 μg μL⁻¹ and A260/280 and A260/230 values for total RNA of 2.17 and 2.35, respectively. The total RNA had good quality with an RIN (RNA integrity number) value of 7.7. Subsequently, the mRNA was purified by magnetic beads and reached a final amount of 5 μg. In brief, by agarose gel electrophoresis, the total RNA and mRNA exhibited excellent quality for cDNA library construction (Figure 2B,C).

The cDNA entry library and pYES-DEST52 expression library were evaluated by counting the CFUs (colony-forming units). Generally, totals of 6.08 × 10⁶ and 5.48 × 10⁶ clones were contained in the entry library and expression library, respectively, which was sufficient to represent most of the genes expressed in I. pes-caprae. Meanwhile, the PCR insert fragment of 24 randomly picked clones from the entry library and expression library ranged from 0.5 to 3.0 kb with an average size over 1 kb (Figure 2D,E). Furthermore, 50 random clones from the pYES-DEST52 expression library were sequenced for full-length identification. After removing eight indistinguishable sequences, the ORFfinder program (available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/) was used to identify the longest open reading frames (ORFs) of the remaining 42 clones, and then the SmartBLAST analysis with the longest ORFs showed that some cDNAs were full-length and some were partial (Supplementary Data Table S1). Each possessed the ATG start codon (Supplementary Data Table S2), which indicated that the expression of cDNAs was guaranteed in the yeast and that the functional screening was effective. The sequences of these cDNA are listed in Supplementary Data Table S3.

2.3. Functional Screening of the cDNA Library for Mining the Candidate IpSR Genes

In this investigation, we chose a salt sensitive yeast strain, AXT3, to perform the FOX hunting assay of the I. pes-caprae cDNA library. AXT3 is functional knock-out with three Na⁺ transporter genes (ena1-4, nha1, and nhx1) and cannot grow well when the Na⁺ concentration in medium is above 50 mM [24,25]. From initial screening of the library plasmids, we chose 75 mM NaCl as a stringent selection concentration, with the empty expression vector pYES2 as a negative control. We found that under the challenge of 75 mM NaCl, the AXT3 yeast transformed with pYES2 could not grow into single clones on an SDG-Ura (supplied with adenine) plate, and a series of rescued single clones transformed with the library plasmids could be picked out and analyzed.

In brief, the plasmids (2–5 μg in total) of the pYES-DEST52 expression library were introduced into salt-sensitive AXT3 competent cells. A total of about 100 single yeast clones were obtained that could grow on NaCl-containing SDG-Ura medium (75 mM NaCl). These yeast clones were selected and amplified, and then the obtained plasmids were identified by alkali splitting and amplified in E coli. The single clone was selected and sequenced. After deleting some noncoding RNA sequences and poor-quality (including partials) or nonreferenced sequences, we ultimately acquired 38 meaningful reference recombinant clones encoding full-length cDNAs of I. pes-caprae genes. Finally, these 38 cDNAs were considered as candidate salt-stress-related genes in I. pes-caprae (IpSRs, Table 1). The sequences of these cDNA are listed in Supplementary Data Table S4.

2.4. Retransformation and Salt Tolerance Confirmation in Yeast

To avoid or prevent false positive results during the library screening process, and also to eliminate the possibility that one yeast clone might carry multiple genes, the plasmids carrying different IpSRs were reintroduced into the yeast strain AXT3 and its allele wild-type W303 to further confirm that these IpSRs could increase the salt tolerance of yeast.

As observed from Figure 3, all 38 genes showed increased salt tolerance in the yeast mutant strain AXT3 under different NaCl concentrations. At the 50 mM NaCl level, all 38 IpSRs almost recovered the salt sensitivity of AXT3, and all the transformant yeast clones showed recovered growth in comparison to the control AXT3 transformed with the empty vector, pYES2. Meanwhile, at higher NaCl levels (75 mM and 200 mM), the 38 IpSRs elevated the salt tolerance of AXT3 to some extent compared with the control AXT3.

We also performed this assay in the wild-type yeast strain W303. As shown in Figure 4, the results showed that in the W303 carrying salt tolerance genes, the 38 IpSRs grew better than those with the empty vector pYES2 in the medium containing 0.85 M, 1.28 M, and 1.5 M NaCl, while no difference was observed in the growth of all yeast in the media lacking salt. These results further demonstrated the salt tolerance function of the 38 candidate genes from I. pes-caprae in yeast.

2.5. H₂O₂ Sensitivity Assays in Yeast

In plants, salt challenge causes osmotic disruption, which in turn leads to ROS production [6]; therefore, oxidant stress pathways might be involved in the salt tolerance pathway. In our research, we assessed the antioxidative activities of some IpSR genes, including IpSR1 (ABA/water stress/ripening-induced, IpASR), IpSR14 (syntaxin/t-SNARE family protein, IpSNARE), IpSR18 (catalase, IpCAT), IpSR19 (stress responsive alpha-beta barrel domain protein, IpSRP), IpSR26 (late embryogenesis abundant protein, IpLEA), IpSR33 (glutathione S-transferase, IpGST), and IpSR38 (dehydrin, IpDHN). Recombinant plasmids pYES-DEST52 carrying the above IpSR cDNAs were introduced into yeast H₂O₂-sensitive mutants yap1Δ and skn7Δ. The yeast genes YAP1 and SKN7 encode two transcriptional factors that play regulatory roles in oxidative stress [26], and mutations of these two genes will result in a decrease in oxidation resistance, exhibiting a sensitive phenotype to H₂O₂. Our results showed that the above-mentioned seven IpSR genes all elevated the tolerance to H₂O₂ of transformed yeast (yap1Δ and skn7Δ). This indicates that the products encoded by these IpSR genes all possess some antioxidative activities (Figure 5A,B).

2.6. qRT-PCR Analysis of Candidate Genes under Salt and Osmotic Stress

In addition to the biochemical functions of the IpSR proteins expressed in yeast, the transcriptional changes of IpSRs in I. pes-caprae also reflect their biological roles under stress treatments. Therefore, we performed qRT-PCR analysis of 38 genes from desiccation- or osmotic-stressed I. pes-caprae (Figure 6; Supplementary Data Figures S1 and S2). We focused here on the induced expression of some IpSRs. In general, the seven IpSR genes whose products possess antioxidant activities in yeast, including IpSR1, IpSR14, IpSR18, IpSR19, IpSR26, IpSR33, and IpSR38, all without exception exhibited obvious characteristics of induced expression under both salt and osmotic stress (Figure 6). Furthermore, in the other 31 candidate IpSRs, eight genes showed significantly induced patterns under these two water imbalance stresses, including IpSR2 (ATP synthase delta chain), IpSR4 (stem-specific protein TSJT1-like protein), IpSR8 (endoplasmic reticulum vesicle transporter), IpSR11 (fructokinase), IpSR16 (adenosylhomocysteinase 1), IpSR24 (hypothetical protein AT3G52710), IpSR25 (phosphomannomutase), and IpSR27 (probable leucine-rich repeat receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase At1g56140). There were also three IpSRs, including IpSR9 (stem-specific protein TSJT1-like), IpSR20 (DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit RPB7), and IpSR29 (phytosulfokines-like) that showed decreased expression patterns under both treatments. Some IpSR genes only showed obvious salt-inducible expression patterns (IpSR10, IpSR12, IpSR15, IpSR23, IpSR32, and IpSR35) or obvious osmotic-inducible expression patterns (IpSR21 and IpSR27) (Supplementary Data Figures S1 and S2).

3. Discussion

Halophytes are considered to be the best germplasms for saline agriculture since they possess a strong capacity to thrive under extremely saline conditions [27]. Most crops are glycophytes; therefore, identifying the genes responsible for superior salinity tolerance in halophytes has great potential for the development of salinity-tolerant glycophytes, especially for the genetic modification of crops to improve salt tolerance. To characterize the genes involved in the salt stress response in I. pes-caprae, we screened the cDNA library of I. pes-caprae with the salt-sensitive yeast mutant AXT3, in which three Na⁺ transporter genes (ena1-4, nha1, and nhx1) were functionally deleted. Although we did not obtain any salt ion transporter genes during the screening process, we did still isolate some salt-stress-related candidate genes from I. pes-caprae (Table 1). This can be reduced to two reasons: firstly, the quality of the I. pes-caprae cDNA library is not good enough to isolate more functional key salt tolerance genes, or a broader screening is still needed to obtain more functional genes; secondly, as a single-cell organism, the yeast cannot fully reflect the salt tolerance process in multicellular plants and especially cannot simulate ion translocation or exclusion during our screening assay. In any case, further functional characterization of some key candidate genes conferring salt tolerance isolated from this assay will be helpful for deepening our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the osmotic stress response and should provide some excellent and operative functional genes for genetic improvements for stress tolerance in crops in the future.

Halophytes can thrive under high salinity by adopting two strategies, namely, salt tolerance and salt avoidance [8]. Generally, euhalophytes possess strong salinity tolerance due to succulence, enabling the storage of more salty ions [28]. Ipomoea pes-caprae is a common pantropical creeping vine plant with slight leaf succulence and obvious stem (or vine) succulence. In our research, the Na⁺ content in the leaves and vines of I. pes-caprae showed apparently higher levels than in the roots (Figure 1A), indicating that I. pes-caprae growing in saline land can absorb and store salt in aboveground tissues. This differs from crinohalophytes and pseudohalophytes, in which the salts are secreted to the surroundings or stored in the roots or some cortical tissues of the aerial parts [29]. Here, we chose I. pes-caprae as a candidate for identifying salt-stress-related genes, and it was speculated that in I. pes-caprae the cells are severely challenged by salt stresses; thus, the multifunctionality of the salt tolerance genes will be more direct and distinctive.

Numerous studies have been done to provide a better understanding of the high salinity tolerance mechanisms of halophytes, with the purpose of isolating some key functional salt tolerance genes allowing halophytes to grow and flourish in high-saline environments and to breed crops with better performance under salinity stress [3,7,30]. However, some molecular biologists have assumed that only basic biochemical tolerance mechanisms, mainly related to water deficiency and osmotic stress processes, may be sufficient to confer a response to salt [31]. Even though only osmotic stress may still trigger many primary responses, including morphological and developmental changes, adjustment in ion transport, and metabolic changes, some secondary stress signal transduction should occur in turn [32]. It is obvious that in halophytes some molecular regulation and responding systems exist that differ from those in glycophytes and which are involved in maintaining regular growth and metabolism of the plant under salt stress.

In general, corresponding to the three categories of salt tolerance mechanisms in plants, the HKT (high-affinity potassium transporter) genes and the SOS (salt overly sensitive) pathway mainly mediate in regulating Na⁺ transport within ion exclusion processes in plants to limit the entry of salt via the roots; in plant tissue tolerance, vacuolar Na⁺/H⁺ antiporters (NHX) or V-PPase/V-ATPase play roles in controlling ion concentration and distribution, or enzymes for the biosynthesis of compatible solutes and proteins for the detoxification of ROS play roles to different extents in improving crop salinity tolerance. As to the third one, osmotic tolerance, although there are no specific candidate genes responding to it, several categories of functional genes, such as ROS generation and detoxification pathways, osmoregulation or ion homeostasis, salt-responsive genes, and transcription factors, even some chaperones, have been proved to be coordinately linked with this stress sensing and signal transduction [3,30]. From the holistic perspective, the osmotic stress as a consequence of ion and water imbalance in the whole plant might also have a greater effect on crop growth than the ionic toxicity, especially at low to moderate salinity levels [3,4].

In plant cells, many environmental stresses induce the accumulation of ROS, which then results in the expression of a series of stress response genes [33]. It is also known that oxidative stress signaling and ROS detoxification are both essential components of salinity stress tolerance mechanisms in halophytes [6]. In this research, we focused on the crosstalk between ROS detoxification and salt tolerance by assessing gene expression regulation by salt stress, and determined seven candidate genes that are involved in the salt stress response. Following the work of Roy et al. [3] and Mishra et al. [30], we classified all of these genes into the category responding to osmotic stress tolerance, mainly by mediating the ROS detoxification and ion/water homeostasis. Plant genetic engineering and manipulation of these novel salt-stress-related genes from I. pes-caprae may facilitate the development of glycophytes, particularly crops, with improved salt tolerance, and in the future may hold great promise in improving agricultural productivity under high salinity and drought stress. Several important candidate genes involved in salt tolerance isolated in this assay are listed and discussed in the following subsections.

3.1. Plant Abscisic Acid, Stress, and Ripening-Induced (ASR) Proteins

In this research, we obtained a yeast clone containing IpASR cDNA encoding an abscisic acid stress ripening-related protein, which showed high amino acid identities with the Suaeda liaotungensis ASR protein SlASR (AGZ20206.1) [34] and the Salicornia brachiate ASR protein SbASR-1 (ACI15208.1) [35]. ASR proteins play biochemical roles not only as transcription factors, but also as chaperones [36,37], and a number of reports have indicated that ASR members are involved in the salt and drought stress response which is gaining increasing attention due to water shortage issues in agriculture. Homology analysis of different plant ASR proteins indicated that IpASR could play similar biological roles in responding to high salt and drought stress. In our research, IpASR could partly complement the salt-sensitive defect of the yeast mutant strain AXT3 (Figure 3), and could also elevate the salt tolerance of the wild yeast strain W303 (Figure 4). Further experiments in yeast strains yap1Δ and skn7Δ suggested that IpASR could also improve oxidation resistance in yeast (Figure 5). The expression of IpASR in I. pes-caprae seedlings was also obviously induced under salt (300 mM NaCl) and osmotic stress (300 mM mannitol) challenges (Figure 6), which further indicated that IpASR might play pivotal roles in the adaptation of I. pes-caprae as a halophyte to extremely salty and dry environments.

3.2. LEA Proteins

Plant LEA proteins are hydrophilic and intrinsically disordered proteins which have been variously proposed to protect cellular structures from the effects of water loss by acting as a hydration buffer, by sequestering ions, by direct protection of other proteins or membranes, or by renaturing unfolded proteins [38]. Among them, dehydrins belong to group II LEA proteins, which are considered to be stress proteins involved in the formation of protective responses of plants to osmotic stress [39]. Many previous studies regarding the ectopic expression of individual LEA genes, including dehydrins, in various organisms have also provided support for functions in cellular protection under conditions of stress, including salinity, frost, and, in particular, drought [40,41]. In our study, yeast strains (AXT3 and W303) transformed with either a LEA gene (IpLEA) or a dehydrin gene (IpDHN) cloned from I. pes-caprae subjected to salinity stress exhibited better survival than those with the empty vectors (Figure 3 and Figure 4) and also exhibited an increased tolerance against the oxidant H₂O₂ in yap1Δ and skn7Δ (Figure 5), indicating that IpLEA and IpDHN could positively regulate salinity tolerance and mediate the response to oxidative stress. Our RT-PCR analysis showed obvious induced patterns under salt (300 mM NaCl) and osmotic stress (300 mM mannitol) challenges (Figure 6), suggesting possible cellular protective effects regulated by salinity and osmotic stress. The functions of IpLEA and IpDHN cloned from I. pes-caprae in regulating salinity tolerance deserve further consideration.

3.3. SNARE Proteins

Soluble N-ethylmaleimidesensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptors (SNARE) proteins constitute a type of membrane-anchored proteins that play key roles in vesicle-associated membrane fusion events during cellular vesicle trafficking between individual compartments of the endomembrane system, including exocytosis and endocytosis [42]. Considering that vesicle trafficking is a cellular housekeeping activity, SNARE may function in the spatial distribution of ion transporters that are important for plant development, as well as for ion detoxification caused by salt stress. Meanwhile, vesicle trafficking may also be influenced by the ion gradients they establish within the expanding cell [43]. Several reports have shown that over-expression of plant SNARE genes could improve the salt and drought tolerance of transgenic plants [44,45,46], which indicates that SNARE proteins might be involved in membrane stability, the K⁺/Na⁺ ratio, and antioxidant machinery [45]. NCBI SmartBlast analysis revealed that the IpSNARE (IpSR14) protein has a high sequence identity (47% amino acid identity under 77% query cover) to a SNARE-like superfamily protein from A. thaliana (NP_567842.1; At4g30240). In our research, we speculated that IpSNARE might be involved in Na⁺ and H₂O₂ redistribution in yeast by facilitating vesicle trafficking and improving the tolerance of yeast to salt and H₂O₂ (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). The expression of IpSNARE was also induced by salt and osmotic stress in vivo (Figure 6). The results suggest that IpSNARE could be a potential candidate gene for increasing salinity and drought tolerance in crop plants for sustainable agriculture in arid and/or saline soil.

3.4. Catalase and Glutathione S-Transferase

Halophytic adaptation to salt stress involves a series of biochemical pathways and many active compounds including antioxidant enzymes. Catalase and glutathione S-transferase are two types of antioxidant enzymes responsible for ROS scavenging in plants [47]. Catalases can directly detoxify H₂O₂ generated from photorespiratory pathways, and also can effectively relieve the restrained growth caused by salt or other abiotic stresses [48]. Although there is little evidence for the up-regulated expression of catalase genes in plants for improving salt tolerance, some studies involving the knock-out or knock-down of catalase genes have indicated that they play significant roles against salinity in plants [49]. A catalase gene from the cyanobacterium Anabaena, katB, was strongly induced in response to osmotic stress or desiccation, and inactivation of katB resulted in enhanced sensitivity to salt stress in Anabaena cells [50]. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), as a type of detoxification enzyme, have versatile functions in multiple aspects of plant growth and development [51]. It has been confirmed that GSTs are induced by a variety of biotic and abiotic stresses [52]. Several plant glutathione transferase genes have been proved by plant transgenic assays mediating osmotic stress tolerance, mainly by ROS detoxification [53,54,55,56]. Here, we identified a catalase gene and a GST gene by functional screening with the I. pes-caprae cDNA library (Table 1), and there is little doubt that these two genes can improve the tolerance of yeast to H₂O₂ (Figure 5). RT-PCR analysis indicated that the expression patterns of the two genes challenged by salt and osmotic stress were both up-regulated (Figure 6), which further indicated that these two genes (IpSR18 and IpSR33, defined as IpCAT and IpGST, respectively) might be involved in osmotic and water deficit stresses by mediating ROS equilibrium. Furthermore, our study also implied that IpCAT and IpGST may be potential candidate genes to be used in genetic engineering for enhancing abiotic stress tolerance.

3.5. Other Stress-Responsive Proteins

We also identified some other possible stress-responsive genes, including IpSR3 (nudix hydrolase), IpSR8 (endoplasmic reticulum vesicle transporter), IpSR10 and IpSR23 (proteasome inhibitors), IpSR19 (stress responsive alpha-beta barrel domain protein), and IpSR28 (dnaj protein-like protein) (Table 1). Since their homologous proteins in other species might mediate stress or hormone responses [57,58,59,60,61], future research on the functional identification of these genes should focus on their possible roles in abiotic stress. Of these, IpSR19, encoding a stress-responsive alpha-beta barrel domain protein, also named GLYCOLATE OXIDASE3 (UP3) in Arabidopsis, is a peroxisomal protein [62] that also showed oxidation resistance in yeast strains (Figure 5) and was up-regulated under salt and osmotic stress challenges (Figure 6). We proposed that the IpSR19 protein might also be involved in salt and drought tolerance by maintaining ROS equilibrium in I. pes-caprae.

To date, little genome information is available on I. pes-caprae, and no transcriptome and proteome data have been reported. Here, in this study, we adopted a cDNA library and screening strategy, the FOX hunting system, to obtain functional genes with full-length cDNAs responding to specific abiotic stresses within a short span of time. This approach may be particularly useful for the identification of some functional genes in wild plants lacking genetic information, and will be of great convenience for the elucidation of salt-tolerant or other stress-related genes. The FOX gene hunting approach was first proposed by Ichikawa T. et al. for the purpose of isolating functional genes in Arabidopsis that could result in a mutant phenotype via overexpression of the genes [63]. Subsequently, this technology has also been applied to rice with activation tags in a large generated rice population to identify useful traits and functional genes [14,64]. In Eutrema salsugineum (a halophyte, relative of Arabidopsis, also known as Thellungiella salsuginea and formerly Thellungiella halophila), two functional genes responding to salt or heat stress were also identified with the FOX hunting system [65,66]. Also, in another Brassicaceae halophytic relative of Arabidopsis, Lepidium crassifolium, the cDNA library was screened with the FOX hunting system in Arbidopsis, and the proteins GDSL-like lipase and Acyl CoA binding protein 6 were supposed to be involved in salt tolerance and osmotic stress tolerance, respectively [67]. After a decade of development, this strategy has been identified as a powerful tool for elucidating functional genomics and facilitating the discovery of useful genes in model plants or crops [17,68,69] or digging useful candidate genes from some wild plants [65,66,67]. The functional screening and identification of genes by transgenic assays in plants is a time-consuming and costly process during the first course of cDNA library screening. A modified FOX gene hunting system has been applied with a central change in the screening method, that is, with functional identification in yeast instead of in a plant; in this way, the experimental cycle of FOX hunting was greatly reduced [15,16,22]. For some wild plants lacking any genetic information, the FOX gene hunting approach with a novel gain-of-function strategy showed a greater advantage in the once-off and wide acquisition of full-length cDNAs of functional genes in a short time. In this research, a modified FOX gene hunting system was applied, resulting in the identification of 38 full-length cDNAs encoding candidate salt tolerance genes from I. pes-caprae.

In summary, in this paper we described a highly efficient approach for isolating salt tolerance genes from I. pes-caprae based on a FOX gene hunting system for the large-scale screening of functional genes. A high-quality cDNA expression library was successfully constructed and 38 potential IpSRs were identified. Several known genes involved in salt tolerance also showed oxidation resistance in yeast, and the transcriptional expression levels were detected. Interestingly, our results indicated that several pathways might participate in the regulation of salt tolerance in I. pes-caprae, including those related to water deficit, ROS scavenging, and cellular vesicle trafficking. These results provide the first insight into the salt tolerance gene network in I. pes-caprae. However, the biochemical and molecular mechanisms regarding the manner in which these novel genes regulate salinity tolerance are unknown. Further analysis of these IpSRs could provide deeper insights into the survival mechanisms of halophytes in extreme environments, and the identified genes could then serve as useful targets for the genetic modification of glycophytic plants for improved stress tolerance.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials, Growth Conditions, and Stress Treatments

The seeds and young plants of I. pes-caprae were harvested from August to October around the seaside of Huizhou city (22°41′24.81″ N, 114°44′48.02″ E), Guangdong province. The young leaves and shoots were used to construct a cDNA library. For culturing the seedlings of I. pes-caprae, the seeds were sterilized with 70% ethanol followed by seed coat breaking with emery paper prior to placement onto MS basal salts distributed in plates with sand and soil collected outdoors from April to November in Guangzhou city. The seedlings were used for salt tolerance assays 30 days after germination. Subsequently, salt (300 mM NaCl) and osmotic (300 mM mannitol) stresses were applied to I. pes-caprae seedlings to detect the expression patterns of some candidate salt-tolerant genes. Experiments were performed following a completely randomized design with three replications and were repeated three times.

4.2. Measurement of Na⁺ and K⁺ Contents in I. pes-caprae

Whole plants of I. pes-caprae were harvested from four different beaches in Guangdong province, including Shenzhen (22°32′13.16″ N, 114°29′11.26″ E), Huizhou (22°41′24.81″ N, 114°44′48.02″ E), Yangjiang (21°34′37.34″ N, 111°52′15.95″ E), and Shanwei (22°47′10.97″ N, 115°10′22.83″ E); a sample series of I. pes-caprae growing in South China Botanical Garden (23°18′49.89″ N, 113°35′84.32″ E) cultivated with freshwater and regular soil was used as a control, as well as adult Arabidopsis (ecotype: col-0) plants cultured in a greenhouse under regular conditions. The different tissues of I. pes-caprae collected from those five areas were separated into fibrous roots, old roots, vines, and leaves, and then each sample (about 10 g) was cleaned with water and dried in a constant-temperature drying oven at 70 °C; the whole Arabidopsis plants were treated with the same protocol. Dried samples were crushed by a vibrating and ball-mining mixed machine (GSM 06, Siebtechnik, Mülheim, Germany). About 0.2 g of sample powder (accurate to 0.0001 g) was placed in a polytetrafluoroethylene tube and 6 mL of analytically pure concentrated nitric acid was added to each sample overnight at room temperature. The samples were then treated with a microwave digestion system according to the operating manual. Following microwave digestion, the sample liquids were transferred to new 50 mL volumetric flasks, diluted with ddH₂O to a certain volume, and mixed. The contents of Na⁺ and K⁺ in the sample solutions were measured with a Perkin-Elmer inductively coupled plasma atomic absorption spectrometer. Each tissue sample was collected from three dependent adjacent plants in the same spot.

4.3. cDNA Library Construction and Quality Examination Assays

Total RNAs were extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and mRNAs were isolated from the total RNAs using the FastTrack^® MAG mRNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The integrity and purity of total RNAs extracted from the plants was detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and a Nucleic Acid Analyzer (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA), and purified mRNAs were subjected to the same analysis. The total mRNAs were reverse-transcribed to the cDNAs using a SMART cDNA Synthesis Kit (Clontech, Takara Bio, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA libraries were constructed based on the Gateway^® cloning technology (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). In brief, the double strand-cDNAs were cloned into the pDONR222 vector using BP reaction (Gateway™ BP Clonase™ II Enzyme, Invitrogen), and the entry clone library was obtained. Through the LR reaction (Gateway™ LR Clonase™ II Enzyme mix, Invitrogen) of the Gateway^® cloning technology, the yeast expression vector pYES-DEST52 was ligated with the entry clone library to generate the secondary yeast expression library, in which the total I. pes-caprae cDNAs were inserted into the yeast expression cassette under the galactose-induced promoter pGAL1.

The mixtures of the BP and LR reactions containing an entry clone library and secondary expression library were introduced separately into competent cells of E. coli DH10B by electroporation. Thousand-fold diluted libraries were then cultured overnight on a solid medium plate (LB plus 50 mg L⁻¹ kanamycin or 100 mg L⁻¹ ampicillin) and the clones were counted. Twenty-four single clones of the two libraries were selected separately to obtain a monoclonal colony to detect the length of the inserted fragment of the libraries. The primer pairs for pDONR222 and pYES-DEST52 were pD22F/pD22R (5′-3′): GTAAAACGACGGCCAGTC/CCAGGAAACAGCTATGAC and T7/pY52R (5′-3′): TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG/AGGGTTAGGGATAGGCTTACC. Fifty random clones in the secondary expression library were sequenced; thereafter, the start codon (ATG) was found following BLASTX analysis.

4.4. Yeast Mutant Strains and Functional Screening

The salt-sensitive yeast mutant strain AXT3 (ena1-4Δ::HIS3; nha1Δ::LEU2; nhx1Δ::TRP1) and its wild-type strain W303 (MATa; his3-11_15; leu2-3_112; ura3-1; trp1Δ2; ade2-1; can1-100) were kindly provided by Pardo [24] and Jiang [25]. H₂O₂-sensitive mutant yeast strains yap1Δ (Y00569, BY4741; MATa; ura3Δ0; leu2Δ0; his3Δ1; met15Δ0; YML007w::kanMX4), skn7Δ (Y02900, BY4741; MATa; ura3Δ0; leu2Δ0; his3Δ1; met15Δ0; YHR206w::kanMX4) and their isogenic wild-type (WT) BY4741 (Y00000, MATa; his3Δ1; leu2Δ0; met15Δ0; ura3Δ0) were all obtained from Euroscarf (available online: http://www.euroscarf.de/index.php?name=News).

The pYES-DEST52 cDNA expression library plasmids were separated using the SDS alkaline lysis method and then introduced into yeast strains via a polyethylene glycol (PEG)–lithium acetate-based transformation protocol [70] to screen the candidate stress-related functional genes. For the salt-sensitive mutant AXT3, the transformation products were plated on SDG-Ura solid medium (supplied with adenine) with 75 mM NaCl lacking uracil. The plates were placed at 30 °C for 3 to 7 days until single clones appeared. The plasmids from the surviving yeast clones were rescued in E. coli and extracted. About 100 plasmids in total were selected and sequenced with an automatic sequencing machine (ABI, Columbia, MD, USA). The plasmids containing the candidate cDNAs were also introduced into different yeast stains to perform the function verification, based on the same transformation protocol [70]. The basal SDG (Synthetic Dropout-/Galactose) medium was made with 1.7 g L⁻¹ Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB powder, BD Difco™, Bergen County, NJ, USA), 5 g L⁻¹ ammonium sulfate, and 20 g L⁻¹ galactose, with a pH value of 7.5.

4.5. Salt and H₂O₂ Sensitivity Assays in Yeast Cells

Following sequence confirmation of the plasmids isolated from the surviving yeast clones, the plasmids containing I. pes-caprae cDNAs were then transformed into yeast cells following Gietz and Woods to confirm the salt (W303 and AXT3) and H₂O₂ (WT, yap1Δ, and skn7Δ) tolerance of the candidate functional genes isolated from the cDNA library. In general, yeast transformants were precultured in SDG-Ura medium overnight at 30 °C, diluted with fresh prewarmed SDG-Ura medium, and then incubated with vigorous shaking for about 48 h at 30 °C to reach an optical density of just over 2.0 at OD600. Then, the cells were serially diluted in 10-fold steps, and 2 μL aliquots of each were finally spotted onto SDG-Ura agar medium with or without NaCl or H₂O₂. The NaCl concentrations used were 50, 75, and 200 mM for salt tolerance with the AXT3 yeast strain, or 0.85 M (mass-to-volume 5%), 1.28 M (mass-to-volume 7.5%), and 1.5 M (mass-to-volume 8.8%) NaCl separately for salt tolerance with the wild-type yeast strain W303. The H₂O₂ concentrations were 0.25 and 0.5 mM for the antioxidative assay with yeast strain WT (wild-type BY4741), yap1Δ, and skn7Δ. The test plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3 to 7 days.

4.6. Quantitative Reverse Transcription (qRT)-PCR Analysis

According to the sequences of the cDNAs screened from the cDNA library of I. pes-caprae, the qRT-PCR primer pairs were designed using the online program for Primer-BLAST with the following parameters: Tm of approximately 60 °C and product size range of 90–250 bp (available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/index.cgi?LINK_LOC=BlastHome). The partial cDNA sequence of the reference gene (IpUBQ) was cloned from I. pes-caprae and submitted to GenBank (accession number: MF502417), and was used as an internal control to normalize the amount of total cDNA present in each reaction. The primer sequences used for qRT-PCR analysis are listed in Supplementary Data Table S4. Generally, total RNAs were isolated with the HiPure Plant RNA Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China) from the leaves, vines, and roots of I. pes-caprae seedlings according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Three parallel experiments were carried out to enable the assessment of significance. After assessing the concentration using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA), first strand cDNAs were synthesized by adopting TransScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) from 1 μg total RNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR was conducted using a model 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) and TransStart Tip Green qPCR SuperMix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China).

4.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were repeated at least three times in independent experiments, and the plant samples of independent experiments were harvested from at least five seedlings per treatment. The data analysis was performed using the statistical tools (Student’s t-test) of Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Seattle, WA, USA).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/11/3446/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-G.J., M.Z., K.-F.X.; Data curation, M.Z., H.Z., J.-X.Z. and H.M.; Formal analysis, M.Z., H.Z.; Funding acquisition, S.-G.J., M.Z., K.-F.X.; Methodology, M.Z., H.Z. and J.-X.Z.; Project administration, M.Z. and K.-F.X.; Supervision, S.-G.J. and M.Z.; Writing—original draft, M.Z.; Writing—review & editing, M.Z., S.-G.J.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1403002), the “Strategic Priority Research Program” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA13020500), and “the Twelfth Five-Year” National S&T Projects for Rural Areas (2015BAL04B04). The funders had no roles in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Xing-Yu Jiang (Hainan University), Yang Zhou (Hainan University), and José M. Pardo (Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología, C.S.I.C.) for providing yeast strains AXT3 and W303. Thanks are also given to several anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

FOX	Full-length cDNA Over-eXpressor
SR	Salt-stress Related
qRT-PCR	Quantitative Reverse Transcript-Polymerase Chain Reaction
ROS	Reactive Oxygen Species
SCBG	South China Botanical Garden
NCBI	National Center for Biotechnology Information
RIN	RNA Integrity Number
ORF	Open Reading Frame
LB	Luria-Bertani
MS	Murashige and Skoog
SDG	Synthetic Dropout/Galactose
OX	Over eXpression

References

Shabala, S. Learning from halophytes: Physiological basis and strategies to improve abiotic stress tolerance in crops. Ann. Bot. 2013, 112, 1209–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Deinlein, U.; Stephan, A.B.; Horie, T.; Luo, W.; Xu, G.; Schroeder, J.I. Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Roy, S.J.; Negrão, S.; Tester, M. Salt resistant crop plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 26, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhu, J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 247–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bose, J.; Rodrigo-Moreno, A.; Shabala, S. ROS homeostasis in halophytes in the context of salinity stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1241–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kumari, A.; Das, P.; Parida, A.K.; Agarwal, P.K. Proteomics, metabolomics, and ionomics perspectives of salinity tolerance in halophytes. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Flowers, T.J.; Colmer, T.D. Plant salt tolerance: Adaptations in halophytes. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Devall, M.S; Thien, L.B. Factors influencing the reproductive success of Ipomoea pes-caprae (Convolvulaceae) around the gulf of Mexico. Am. J. Bot. 1989, 76, 1821–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Miryeganeh, M.; Takayama, K.; Tateishi, Y.; Kajita, T. Long-distance dispersal by sea-drifted seeds has maintained the global distribution of Ipomoea pes-caprae subsp. brasiliensis (Convolvulaceae). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ouyang, P.Y.; Liu, N.; Zhang, W.W.; Wang, J.; Jian, S.G. Biological and ecophysiological characteristics of a beach plant Ipomoea pes-caprae. J. Hunan Univ. Sci. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2011, 26, 117–121. [Google Scholar]
Urano, K.; Kurihara, Y.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K. ‘Omics’ analyses of regulatory networks in plant abiotic stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 2010, 3, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Higuchi-Takeuchi, M.; Kondou, Y.; Ichikawa, T.; Matsui, M. Full-length cDNA overexpressor gene hunting system (FOX hunting system). Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 678, 77–89. [Google Scholar]
Sakurai, T.; Kondou, Y.; Akiyama, K.; Kurotani, A.; Higuchi, M.; Ichikawa, T.; Kuroda, H.; Kusano, M.; Mori, M.; Saitou, T.; et al. RiceFOX: A database of Arabidopsis mutant lines overexpressing rice full-length cDNA that contains a wide range of trait information to facilitate analysis of gene function. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chen, Y.; Zong, J.; Tan, Z.; Li, L.; Hu, B.; Chen, C.; Chen, J.; Liu, J. Systematic mining of salt-tolerant genes in halophyte-Zoysia matrella through cDNA expression library screening. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 89, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; Tan, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhuang, L.; Yang, Z.; Huang, B. Functional identification and characterization of genes cloned from halophyte seashore paspalum conferring salinity and cadmium tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Li, X.; Huang, L.; Lu, J.; Cheng, Y.; You, Q.; Wang, L.; Song, X.; Zhou, X.; Jiao, Y. Large-scale investigation of soybean gene functions by overexpressing a full-Length soybean cDNA library in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lippuner, V.; Cyert, M.S.; Gasser, C.S. Two classes of plant cDNA clones differentially complement yeast calcineurin mutants and increase salt tolerance of wild-type yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 12859–12866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Piao, H.L.; Pih, K.T.; Lim, J.H.; Kang, S.G.; Jin, J.B.; Kim, S.H.; Hwang, I. An Arabidopsis GSK3/shaggy-like gene that complements yeast salt stress-sensitive mutants is induced by NaCl and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 1527–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Matsumoto, T.K.; Pardo, J.M.; Takeda, S.; Bressan, R.A.; Hasegawa, P.M. Tobacco and Arabidiopsis SLT1 mediate salt tolerance of yeast. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 45, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Obata, T.; Kitamoto, H.K.; Nakamura, A.; Fukuda, A.; Tanaka, Y. Rice shaker potassium channel OsKAT1 confers tolerance to salinity stress on yeast and rice cells. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1978–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yu, G.; Li, J.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Pan, H. Exploration for the salinity tolerance-related genes from xero-halophyte Atriplex canescens exploiting yeast functional screening system. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, E2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kamakura, M.; Furukawa, A. Compensatory function for water transport by adventitious roots of Ipomoea pes-caprae. J. Plant Res. 2009, 122, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Quintero, F.J.; Blatt, M.R.; Pardo, J.M. Functional conservation between yeast and plant endosomal Na⁺/H⁺ antiporters. FEBS Lett. 2000, 471, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhou, Y.; Yin, X.; Duan, R.; Hao, G.; Guo, J.; Jiang, X. SpAHA1 and SpSOS1 coordinate in transgenic yeast to improve salt tolerance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0137447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bienert, G.P.; Møller, A.L.; Kristiansen, K.A.; Schulz, A.; Møller, I.M.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Jahn, T.P. Specific aquaporins facilitate the diffusion of hydrogen peroxide across membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ventura, Y.; Eshel, A.; Pasternak, D.; Sagi, M. The development of halophyte-based agriculture: Past and present. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Reimann, C.; Breckle, S.W. Salt tolerance and ion relations of Salsola kali L.: Differences between ssp. tragus (L.) Nyman and ssp. ruthenica (Iljin) Soó. New Phytol. 1995, 130, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Glenn, E.P.; Brown, J.J.; Blumwald, E. Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1999, 18, 227–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mishra, A.; Tanna, B. Halophytes: Potential resources for salt stress tolerance genes and promoters. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhu, J.K.; Hasegawa, P.M.; Bressan, R.A. Molecular aspects of osmotic stress in plants. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1997, 16, 253–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xiong, L.; Zhu, J.K. Molecular and genetic aspects of plant responses to osmotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
You, J.; Chan, Z. ROS regulation during abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hu, Y.X.; Yang, X.; Li, X.L.; Yu, X.D.; Li, Q.L. The SlASR gene cloned from the extreme halophyte Suaeda liaotungensis K. enhances abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 2014, 549, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jha, B.; Lal, S.; Tiwari, V.; Yadav, S.K.; Agarwal, P.K. The SbASR-1 gene cloned from an extreme halophyte Salicornia brachiata enhances salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Mar. Biotechnol. (NY) 2012, 14, 782–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dominguez, P.G.; Carrari, F. ASR1 transcription factor and its role in metabolism. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e992751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shkolnik, D.; Bar-Zvi, D. Tomato ASR1 abrogates the response to abscisic acid and glucose in Arabidopsis by competing with ABI4 for DNA binding. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2008, 6, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Candat, A.; Paszkiewicz, G.; Neveu, M.; Gautier, R.; Logan, D.C.; Avelange-Macherel, M.H.; Macherel, D. The ubiquitous distribution of late embryogenesis abundant proteins across cell compartments in Arabidopsis offers tailored protection against abiotic stress. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3148–3166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Liu, Y.; Song, Q.; Li, D.; Yang, X.; Li, D. Multifunctional roles of plant dehydrins in response to environmental stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hincha, D.K.; Thalhammer, A. LEA proteins: IDPs with versatile functions in cellular dehydration tolerance. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2012, 40, 1000–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Kosová, K.; Vítámvás, P.; Prášil, I.T. Wheat and barley dehydrins under cold, drought, and salinity—What can LEA-II proteins tell us about plant stress response? Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pratelli, R.; Sutter, J.U.; Blatt, M.R. A new catch in the SNARE. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Grefen, C.; Blatt, M.R. SNAREs--molecular governors in signalling and development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tarte, V.N.; Seok, H.Y.; Woo, D.H.; Le, D.H.; Tran, H.T.; Baik, J.W.; Kang, I.S.; Lee, S.Y.; Chung, T.; Moon, Y.H. Arabidopsis Qc-SNARE gene AtSFT12 is involved in salt and osmotic stress responses and Na⁺ accumulation in vacuoles. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1127–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Singh, D.; Yadav, N.S.; Tiwari, V.; Agarwal, P.K.; Jha, B. A SNARE-Like superfamily protein SbSLSP from the halophyte Salicornia brachiata confers salt and drought tolerance by maintaining membrane stability, K⁺/Na⁺ ratio, and antioxidant machinery. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nisa, Z.U.; Mallano, A.I.; Yu, Y.; Chen, C.; Duan, X.; Amanullah, S.; Kousar, A.; Baloch, A.W.; Sun, X.; Tabys, D.; et al. GsSNAP33, a novel glycine soja SNAP25-type protein gene: Improvement of plant salt and drought tolerances in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 119, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sofo, A.; Scopa, A.; Nuzzaci, M.; Vitti, A. Ascorbate peroxidase and catalase activities and their genetic regulation in plants subjected to drought and salinity stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 13561–13578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mhamdi, A.; Queval, G.; Chaouch, S.; Vanderauwera, S.; Van Breusegem, F.; Noctor, G. Catalase function in plants: A focus on Arabidopsis mutants as stress-mimic models. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 4197–4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chakravarty, D.; Banerjee, M.; Bihani, S.C.; Ballal, A. A salt-inducible Mn-catalase (KatB) protects cyanobacterium from oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 761–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dong, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; He, Q.; Daud, M.K.; Chen, J.; Zhu, S. Glutathione S-transferase gene family in Gossypium raimondii and G. arboreum: Comparative genomic study and their expression under salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dixon, D.P.; Cummins, I.; Cole, D.J.; Edwards, R. Glutathione-mediated detoxification systems in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998, 1, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jha, B.; Sharma, A.; Mishra, A. Expression of SbGSTU (tau class glutathione S-transferase) gene isolated from Salicornia brachiata in tobacco for salt tolerance. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 38, 4823–4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kumar, S.; Asif, M.H.; Chakrabarty, D.; Tripathi, R.D.; Dubey, R.S.; Trivedi, P.K. Expression of a rice Lambda class of glutathione S-transferase, OsGSTL2, in Arabidopsis provides tolerance to heavy metal and other abiotic stresses. J. Hazard Mater. 2013, 248–249, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chan, C.; Lam, H.M. A putative lambda class glutathione S-transferase enhances plant survival under salinity stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 570–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Xu, J.; Xing, X.J.; Tian, Y.S.; Peng, R.H.; Xue, Y.; Zhao, W.; Yao, Q.H. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing tomato glutathione S-transferase showed enhanced resistance to salt and drought stress. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ogawa, T.; Muramoto, K.; Takada, R.; Nakagawa, S.; Shigeoka, S.; Yoshimura, K. Modulation of NADH levels by Arabidopsis nudix hydrolases, AtNUDX6 and 7, and the respective proteins themselves play distinct roles in the regulation of various cellular responses involved in biotic/abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 1295–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hong, S.H.; Chang, S.H.; Cho, K.C.; Kim, S.; Park, S.; Lee, A.Y.; Jiang, H.L.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, S.; Yu, K.N.; et al. Endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment protein 3 knockdown suppresses lung cancer through endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced autophagy. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 65335–65347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yang, B.J.; Han, X.X.; Yin, L.L.; Xing, M.Q.; Xu, Z.H.; Xue, H.W. Arabidopsis PROTEASOME REGULATOR1 is required for auxin-mediated suppression of proteasome activity and regulates auxin signalling. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Salas-Muñoz, S.; Rodríguez-Hernández, A.A.; Ortega-Amaro, M.A.; Salazar-Badillo, F.B.; Jiménez-Bremont, J.F. Arabidopsis AtDjA3 null mutant shows increased sensitivity to abscisic acid, salt, and osmotic stress in germination and post-germination stages. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Engqvist, M.K.; Schmitz, J.; Gertzmann, A.; Florian, A.; Jaspert, N.; Arif, M.; Balazadeh, S.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Fernie, A.R.; Maurino, V.G. GLYCOLATE OXIDASE3, a glycolate oxidase homolog of yeast l-Lactate cytochrome c oxidoreductase, supports l-Lactate oxidation in roots of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 1042–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Quan, S.; Yang, P.; Cassin-Ross, G.; Kaur, N.; Switzenberg, R.; Aung, K.; Li, J.; Hu, J. Proteome analysis of peroxisomes from etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings identifies a peroxisomal protease involved in β-oxidation and development. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 1518–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ichikawa, T.; Nakazawa, M.; Kawashima, M.; Iizumi, H.; Kuroda, H.; Kondou, Y.; Tsuhara, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Ishikawa, A.; Seki, M.; et al. The FOX hunting system: An alternative gain-of-function gene hunting technique. Plant J. 2006, 48, 974–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nakamura, H.; Hakata, M.; Amano, K.; Miyao, A.; Toki, N.; Kajikawa, M.; Pang, J.; Higashi, N.; Ando, S.; Toki, S.; et al. A genome-wide gain-of function analysis of rice genes using the FOX-hunting system. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 65, 357–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Higashi, Y.; Ohama, N.; Ishikawa, T.; Katori, T.; Shimura, A.; Kusakabe, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Ishida, J.; Tanaka, M.; Seki, M.; et al. HsfA1d, a protein identified via FOX hunting using Thellungiella salsuginea cDNAs improves heat tolerance by regulating heat-stress-responsive gene expression. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ariga, H.; Tanaka, T.; Ono, H.; Sakata, Y.; Hayashi, T.; Taji, T. CSP41b, a protein identified via FOX hunting using Eutrema salsugineum cDNAs, improves heat and salinity stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 464, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rigó, G.; Valkai, I.; Faragó, D.; Kiss, E.; Van Houdt, S.; Van de Steene, N.; Hannah, M.A.; Szabados, L. Gene mining in halophytes: Functional identification of stress tolerance genes in Lepidium crassifolium. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 2074–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Higuchi-Takeuchi, M.; Matsui, M. Screening for gene function using the FOX (full-length cDNA overexpressor gene) hunting system. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1056, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Abe, K.; Ichikawa, H. Gene overexpression resources in cereals for functional genomics and discovery of useful genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gietz, R.D.; Woods, R.A. Transformation of yeast by the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Methods Mol. Biol. 2006, 313, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

Figure 1. Na⁺ (A) and K⁺ (B) contents in I. pes-caprae collected from five different areas in Guangdong province. SW: sample from Shanwei (22°47′10.97″ N, 115°10′22.83″ E); SZ: sample from Shenzhen (22°32′13.16″ N, 114°29′11.26″ E); HZ: sample from Huizhou (22°41′24.81″ N, 114°44′48.02″ E); YJ: sample from Yangjiang (21°34′37.34″ N, 111°52′15.95″ E); SCBG: sample from South China Botanical Garden (23°18′49.89″ N, 113°35′84.32″ E). An Arabidopsis sample is also shown as a glycophyte control. All experiments were carried out for three replicates. The results shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3).

Figure 2. (A) The habitats of I. pes-caprae. This pictures were taken at the beach of Zhaoshu Island (16°58′ N, 112°16′ E) on 23 August 2016; (B) Analysis and detection of total RNA extracted from I. pes-caprae by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis; (C) Analysis and detection of mRNA purified from total RNA extracted from I. pes-caprae by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis; (D) Titer and inserted fragment detection of the entry cDNA library by colony PCR; (E) Titer and inserted fragment detection of the expression cDNA library by colony PCR.

Figure 3. Salinity-tolerance confirmations in the yeast salt-sensitive mutant AXT3 of 38 clones (IpSR1 to 38) via library screening from I. pes-caprae. The yeast cultures (OD600 to 2) were serially diluted to OD600 values of 0.2, 0.02, and 0.002, and then 2 μL of yeast liquid was spotted onto SDG-Ura (supplied with adenine for AXT3) plates with or without NaCl (0, 50, 75, and 200 mM NaCl) for 5–10 days. The empty vector pYES2 represents the negative control.

Figure 4. Salinity-tolerance confirmations in yeast wild-type strain W303 of 38 clones (IpSR1 to 38) via library screening from I. pes-caprae. The yeast culture (OD600 to 2) was serially diluted to OD600 values of 0.2, 0.02, and 0.002, and then 2 μL of yeast liquid was spotted onto SDG-Ura (supplied with adenine/leucine/histidine/tryptophan for W303) plates with (0.85, 1.28, and 1.5 M NaCl) or without NaCl for 5–10 days at 30 °C. The empty vector pYES2 represents negative control.

Figure 5. The oxidative resistance test of seven IpSR cDNAs (IpSR1, IpSR14, IpSR18, IpSR19, IpSR26, IpSR33, and IpSR38) overexpressed in the yeast mutant yap1Δ (A) and skn7Δ (B). The yeast culture (OD600 to 2) was serially diluted to OD600 values of 0.2, 0.02, and 0.002, and then 2 μL of yeast liquid was spotted onto SDG-Ura plates without or with H₂O₂ (0.25 mM and 0.5 mM) for 5–10 days at 30 °C. As a negative control, the mutant strain yap1Δ was transformed with the empty vector pYES2. As a positive control, wild-type yeast BY4741 (WT) was transformed with the empty vector pYES2.

Figure 6. RT-PCR analyses of seven salinity-tolerant candidate genes (IpSR1, IpSR14, IpSR18, IpSR19, IpSR26, IpSR33, and IpSR38) in the roots, vines, and leaves of I. pes-caprae seedlings under salinity (left, 300 mM NaCl) and osmotic (right, 300 mM mannitol) stresses at 0 and 24 h. The house-keeping gene IpUBQ (GenBank accession number: MF502417) was used as a reference gene. All determinations were carried out for three biological replicates. The results shown are the mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). * and ** indicate significant differences in comparison with the wild type at 0.01 < p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively (Student’s t-test).

Table 1. Annotation of 38 full-length IpSRs obtained from the yeast functional screening assay.

Clone	GenBank Accession No.	Functional Annotation	Length of cDNAs and Proteins Encoded by the Longest ORFs
IpSR1 (IpASR)	MF680587	putative ripening protein, abscisic acid, stress, and ripening-induced protein (ASR)	962 bp, 215 aa
IpSR2 (IpATPD)	MF680588	ATP synthase delta chain, chloroplastic	921 bp, 250 aa
IpSR3 (IpNUD)	MF680589	nudix hydrolase, chloroplastic	769 bp, 168 aa
IpSR4 (IpTSJT1-1)	MF680590	stem-specific protein TSJT1-like	1260 bp, 251 aa
IpSR5 (IpCDI)	MF680591	contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI)-like protein	1262 bp, 277 aa
IpSR6 (IpFBP)	MF680592	F-box protein At5g46170-like	1538 bp, 388 aa
IpSR7 (IpCAB21)	MF680593	chlorophyll a-b binding protein 21, chloroplastic	1013 bp, 267 aa
IpSR8 (IpERVT)	MF680594	endoplasmic reticulum vesicle transporter, C-terminal	1428 bp, 386 aa
IpSR9 (IpTSJT1-2)	MF680595	stem-specific protein TSJT1-like	1196 bp, 237 aa
IpSR10 (IpPI1)	MF680596	probable proteasome inhibitor	1115 bp, 343 aa
IpSR11 (IpFRK)	MF680597	fructokinase	1312 bp, 324 aa
IpSR12 (IpPABP)	MF680598	polyadenylate-binding protein RBP47B′ isoform X1	1598 bp, 423 aa
IpSR13 (IpTC)	MF680599	probable tocopherol cyclase, chloroplastic	2007 bp, 487 aa
IpSR14 (IpSNARE)	MF680600	hypothetical protein, Syntaxin/t-SNARE family protein	1743 bp, 346 aa
IpSR15 (IpPT)	MF680601	probable inorganic phosphate transporter 1-3	1918 bp, 540 aa
IpSR16 (IpAHCY)	MF680602	adenosylhomocysteinase 1	1844 bp, 485 aa
IpSR17 (IpPUP)	MF680603	peptide upstream protein	2123 bp, 453 aa
IpSR18 (IpCAT)	MF680604	catalase	1758 bp, 492 aa
IpSR19 (IpSRP)	MF680605	stress responsive alpha-beta barrel domain protein	847 bp, 221 aa
IpSR20 (IpRPB7)	MF680606	DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit RPB7	976 bp, 177 aa
IpSR21 (IpUSP3)	MF680607	ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 3	1536 bp, 368 aa
IpSR22 (IpRPS25)	MF680608	40S ribosomal protein S25	557 bp, 108 aa
IpSR23 (IpPI2)	MF680609	probable proteasome inhibitor	1116 bp, 300 aa
IpSR24 (IpHP1)	MF680610	hypothetical protein AT3G52710	997 bp, 225 aa
IpSR25 (IpPMM)	MF680611	phosphomannomutase	1048 bp, 246 aa
IpSR26 (IpLEA)	MF680612	desiccation-related protein At2g46140	1392 bp, 313 aa
IpSR27 (IpLRRK)	MF680613	protein kinase superfamily protein	1732 bp, 385 aa
IpSR28 (IpDNAJ)	MF765747	dnaj protein-like protein	1595 bp, 428 aa
IpSR29 (IpPSK)	MF680614	phytosulfokines-like	721 bp, 81 aa
IpSR30 (IpPSCXI)	MF680615	photosystem I reaction center subunit XI, chloroplastic	803 bp, 218 aa
IpSR31 (IpSCP)	MF680616	sugar carrier protein C	1877 bp, 528 aa
IpSR32 (IpHRGP)	MF680617	hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family protein	930 bp, 215 aa
IpSR33 (IpGST)	MF680618	glutathione S-transferase L3-like isoform X1	1022 bp, 234 aa
IpSR34 (IpABAH)	MF680619	abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylase 4	1748 bp, 465 aa
IpSR35 (IpSR45a)	MF680620	serine/arginine-rich splicing factor SR45a isoform X2	1106 bp, 243 aa
IpSR36 (IpFMT)	MF680621	quercetin 3-O-methyltransferase 1	1277 bp, 356 aa
IpSR37 (IpGBP)	MF680622	guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta-like protein	1253 bp, 326 aa
IpSR38 (IpDHN)	KX426069	dehydrin	983 bp, 217 aa

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, J.-X.; Mo, H.; Xia, K.-F.; Jian, S.-G. Functional Identification of Salt-Stress-Related Genes Using the FOX Hunting System from Ipomoea pes-caprae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113446

AMA Style

Zhang M, Zhang H, Zheng J-X, Mo H, Xia K-F, Jian S-G. Functional Identification of Salt-Stress-Related Genes Using the FOX Hunting System from Ipomoea pes-caprae. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(11):3446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113446

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Mei, Hui Zhang, Jie-Xuan Zheng, Hui Mo, Kuai-Fei Xia, and Shu-Guang Jian. 2018. "Functional Identification of Salt-Stress-Related Genes Using the FOX Hunting System from Ipomoea pes-caprae" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 11: 3446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113446

APA Style

Zhang, M., Zhang, H., Zheng, J. -X., Mo, H., Xia, K. -F., & Jian, S. -G. (2018). Functional Identification of Salt-Stress-Related Genes Using the FOX Hunting System from Ipomoea pes-caprae. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(11), 3446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113446

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Functional Identification of Salt-Stress-Related Genes Using the FOX Hunting System from Ipomoea pes-caprae

Abstract

1. Introduction