Vehicle Speed Estimation and Forecasting Methods Based on Cellular Floating Vehicle Data
<p>(<b>a</b>) The scenario diagram for vehicle movement and the handover on the road; (<b>b</b>) the timing diagram for the handover on the road segment covered by Cell<span class="html-italic">i</span>. BSC, base station controller; RNC, radio network controller.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>The scenario diagram of location update events. LA, location area.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) The scenario diagram for vehicle movement and call arrivals on the road; (<b>b</b>) the timing diagram for call arrivals on the road segment covered by Cell<span class="html-italic">i</span>.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Intelligent transportation system based on the proposed methods.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Vehicle speed estimation based on the back-propagation neural network algorithm.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Trace-driven simulation for the traffic information estimations.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>The distribution of cells, location areas and vehicle detectors (VDs) in the simulation experiments.</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Cellular Networks
2.1.1. System Components
2.1.2. Mobility Management
Idle Mode
- (1)
- Normal location updating: NLU is performed when a new location area is entered (European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), 1995).
- (2)
- Periodic location updating: PLU is performed at the expiration of the timer (ETSI, 1995).
- (3)
- International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) attach: IMSI attach is performed when the MS is turned on [16].
Radio Resource Connected Mode
2.2. Traffic Information Estimation Methods
2.2.1. Location Services
2.2.2. Signal Statistics
2.2.3. Summary
2.3. Traffic Information Forecasting Methods
3. Traffic Information Estimation and Forecasting Methods
3.1. Traffic Information Estimation Methods
Parameter | Description |
---|---|
Q (car/h) | The practical traffic flow |
K (car/km) | The practical traffic density |
U (km/h) | The practical vehicle speed |
τ (h/call) | The call inter-arrival time |
λ (call/h) | The call arrival rate |
t (h/call) | The call holding time |
1/μ (h/call) | The mean call holding time |
x (km) | The time x is between the preceding call arrival and entering the target road |
li (km) | The length of road segment covered by Celli |
b (h) | The cycle time of PLU |
(event/h) | The amount of HOs of road segment covered by Celli |
(event/h) | The amount of CAs of road segment covered by Celli |
(event/h) | The amount of PLUs of road segment covered by Celli |
(car/h) | The estimated traffic flow by using |
(car/h) | The estimated traffic flow by using NLU events |
(car/km) | The estimated traffic density by using |
(car/km) | The estimated traffic density by using |
(km/h) | The estimated vehicle speed by using and |
(km/h) | The estimated vehicle speed by using and |
(km/h) | The estimated vehicle speed by using and |
(km/h) | The estimated vehicle speed by using and |
(km/h) | The practical vehicle speed of road segment i at cycle |
(km/h) | The practical vehicle speed of road segment i at cycle |
(km/h) | The predicted vehicle speed of road segment i at cycle |
(km/h) | The estimated vehicle speed of at cycle |
(km/h) | The estimated vehicle speed of at cycle |
(km/h) | The estimated vehicle speed of at cycle |
(km/h) | The estimated vehicle speed of at cycle |
3.1.1. Traffic Flow Estimation
Traffic Flow Estimation by Using HO Events
Traffic Flow Estimation by Using NLU Events
3.1.2. Traffic Density Estimation
Traffic Density Estimation by Using CA events
Traffic Density Estimation by Using PLU Events
- •
- The actual vehicle density and traffic speed can be obtained from VD on the road. Furthermore, the length of a road segment covered by the cell is .
- •
- The call arrival rate to a cell is , and the call arrival process is assumed to be a Poisson process.
- •
- The cycle time of PLU is , and the number of PLU events is .
3.1.3. Vehicle Speed Estimation
3.2. Vehicle Speed Forecasting Method
4. Experimental Results and Analyses
4.1. Experimental Environments
4.2. The Evaluation of Traffic Information Estimation Methods
4.2.1. The Evaluation of Traffic Flow Estimation
Time | Q1 | The Amount of HOs | The Amount of NLUs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 6672 | 126 | 6672 | 7560 | 6672 | 87% | 100% |
9 | 6200 | 112 | 6200 | 6720 | 6200 | 92% | 100% |
10 | 5435 | 92 | 5435 | 5520 | 5435 | 98% | 100% |
11 | 5663 | 80 | 5663 | 4800 | 5663 | 85% | 100% |
12 | 5532 | 90 | 5532 | 5400 | 5532 | 98% | 100% |
13 | 5265 | 90 | 5265 | 5400 | 5265 | 97% | 100% |
14 | 5546 | 90 | 5546 | 5400 | 5546 | 97% | 100% |
15 | 6368 | 88 | 6368 | 5280 | 6368 | 83% | 100% |
16 | 5762 | 78 | 5762 | 4680 | 5762 | 81% | 100% |
17 | 6101 | 124 | 6101 | 7440 | 6101 | 78% | 100% |
18 | 6122 | 104 | 6122 | 6240 | 6122 | 98% | 100% |
19 | 5378 | 74 | 5378 | 4440 | 5378 | 83% | 100% |
20 | 4667 | 72 | 4667 | 4320 | 4667 | 93% | 100% |
21 | 4625 | 64 | 4625 | 3840 | 4625 | 83% | 100% |
22 | 4312 | 60 | 4312 | 3600 | 4312 | 83% | 100% |
Mean | 89% | 100% |
Cell | ||
---|---|---|
Cell1 | 89% | 100% |
Cell2 | 76% | 100% |
Cell3 | 77% | 100% |
Cell4 | 78% | 100% |
Cell5 | 70% | 100% |
Cell6 | 67% | 99% |
Cell7 | 68% | 100% |
Cell8 | 70% | 100% |
Cell9 | 72% | 100% |
Mean | 74% | 100% |
4.2.2. The Evaluation of Traffic Density Estimation
Time | K1 | The Amount of CAs | The Amount of PLUs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 97 | 97 | 126 | 97 | 128 | 99% | 67% |
9 | 88 | 86 | 112 | 86 | 103 | 97% | 83% |
10 | 77 | 71 | 92 | 71 | 81 | 93% | 95% |
11 | 69 | 62 | 80 | 62 | 74 | 90% | 92% |
12 | 67 | 69 | 90 | 69 | 58 | 96% | 87% |
13 | 63 | 69 | 90 | 69 | 70 | 91% | 89% |
14 | 67 | 69 | 90 | 69 | 74 | 97% | 89% |
15 | 78 | 68 | 88 | 68 | 99 | 87% | 72% |
16 | 70 | 60 | 78 | 60 | 85 | 86% | 78% |
17 | 87 | 96 | 124 | 96 | 105 | 89% | 78% |
18 | 87 | 80 | 104 | 80 | 105 | 92% | 79% |
19 | 76 | 57 | 74 | 57 | 97 | 75% | 72% |
20 | 56 | 55 | 72 | 55 | 60 | 99% | 92% |
21 | 55 | 49 | 64 | 49 | 70 | 89% | 73% |
22 | 51 | 46 | 60 | 46 | 64 | 90% | 75% |
Mean | 91% | 81% |
Cell | ||
---|---|---|
Cell1 | 91% | 81% |
Cell2 | 88% | 75% |
Cell3 | 90% | 70% |
Cell4 | 86% | 86% |
Cell5 | 84% | 75% |
Cell6 | 88% | 73% |
Cell7 | 86% | 76% |
Cell8 | 87% | 84% |
Cell9 | 84% | 73% |
Mean | 87% | 77% |
4.2.3. The Evaluation of Vehicle Speed Estimation
Time | U1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 69 | 78 | 69 | 59 | 52 | 87% | 99% | 85% | 75% |
9 | 70 | 78 | 72 | 65 | 60 | 89% | 97% | 93% | 86% |
10 | 71 | 78 | 77 | 69 | 67 | 90% | 92% | 97% | 95% |
11 | 83 | 77 | 91 | 65 | 76 | 94% | 89% | 78% | 92% |
12 | 83 | 78 | 80 | 93 | 96 | 94% | 96% | 88% | 85% |
13 | 83 | 78 | 76 | 77 | 75 | 94% | 92% | 92% | 90% |
14 | 83 | 78 | 80 | 73 | 75 | 94% | 97% | 88% | 90% |
15 | 82 | 78 | 94 | 53 | 64 | 95% | 86% | 65% | 78% |
16 | 83 | 78 | 96 | 55 | 68 | 94% | 84% | 67% | 82% |
17 | 70 | 78 | 64 | 71 | 58 | 90% | 90% | 100% | 82% |
18 | 70 | 78 | 77 | 59 | 58 | 89% | 91% | 84% | 83% |
19 | 71 | 78 | 94 | 46 | 55 | 90% | 67% | 65% | 78% |
20 | 84 | 79 | 85 | 72 | 78 | 94% | 99% | 86% | 93% |
21 | 84 | 78 | 94 | 55 | 66 | 93% | 87% | 65% | 79% |
22 | 84 | 78 | 94 | 56 | 67 | 93% | 89% | 67% | 80% |
Mean | 92% | 90% | 81% | 85% |
Cell | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cell1 | 92% | 90% | 81% | 85% |
Cell2 | 80% | 86% | 62% | 81% |
Cell3 | 75% | 90% | 62% | 79% |
Cell4 | 86% | 83% | 72% | 88% |
Cell5 | 76% | 81% | 59% | 80% |
Cell6 | 73% | 85% | 55% | 80% |
Cell7 | 76% | 84% | 57% | 82% |
Cell8 | 72% | 85% | 64% | 86% |
Cell9 | 78% | 80% | 56% | 78% |
Mean | 79% | 85% | 63% | 82% |
4.3. The Evaluation of Vehicle Speed Forecasting Method
Time | Forecasted Vehicle Speed of LR | Forecasted Vehicle Speed of BPNN | The Accuracy of LR | The Accuracy of BPNN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 70 | 76 | 69 | 92.32% | 98.90% |
9 | 71 | 78 | 73 | 90.05% | 96.32% |
10 | 83 | 79 | 77 | 95.95% | 93.26% |
11 | 83 | 83 | 81 | 99.78% | 97.30% |
12 | 83 | 85 | 86 | 98.40% | 96.86% |
13 | 83 | 80 | 80 | 96.60% | 96.74% |
14 | 82 | 80 | 80 | 97.89% | 98.18% |
15 | 83 | 81 | 78 | 97.89% | 93.95% |
16 | 70 | 82 | 79 | 83.16% | 87.91% |
17 | 70 | 72 | 73 | 97.73% | 96.19% |
18 | 71 | 74 | 75 | 95.30% | 93.91% |
19 | 84 | 79 | 81 | 94.50% | 96.52% |
20 | 84 | 79 | 80 | 94.54% | 95.47% |
21 | 84 | 80 | 84 | 94.75% | 99.93% |
22 | 85 | 79 | 86 | 93.47% | 98.76% |
Mean | 94.82% | 96.01% |
Cell | The Accuracy of LR | The Accuracy of BPNN |
---|---|---|
Cell1 | 94.82% | 96.01% |
Cell2 | 93.76% | 96.29% |
Cell3 | 93.42% | 95.24% |
Cell4 | 92.39% | 94.03% |
Cell5 | 93.25% | 94.72% |
Cell6 | 93.59% | 97.35% |
Cell7 | 92.26% | 95.74% |
Cell8 | 93.73% | 95.19% |
Cell9 | 93.84% | 96.88% |
Mean | 93.45% | 95.72% |
5. Conclusions and Future Work
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gao, M.; Zhu, T.; Wan, X.; Wang, Q. Analysis of travel time pattern in urban using taxi GPS data. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, Beijing, China, 20–23 August 2013; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 512–517. [Google Scholar]
- Green, D.; Gaffney, J.; Bennett, P.; Feng, Y.; Higgins, M.; Millner, J. Vehicle Positioning for C-ITS in Australia (Background Document); Project No. AP-R431/13; ARRB Group Limited: Victoria, Australia, 2013; p. 78. [Google Scholar]
- Ansari, K.; Feng, Y. Design of an integration platform for V2X wireless communications and positioning supporting C-ITS safety applications. J. Glob. Position. Syst. 2013, 12, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schoettle, B.; Sivak, M. A survey of Public Opinion about Connected Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia; Report No. UMTRI-2014–10; UMTRI: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Jang, J.; Byun, S. Evaluation of traffic data accuracy using Korea detector testbed. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2011, 5, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramezani, A.; Moshiri, B.; Kian, A.R.; Aarabi, B.N.; Abdulhai, B. Distributed maximum likelihood estimation for flow and speed density prediction in distributed traffic detectors with Gaussian mixture model assumption. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2012, 6, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunter, T.; Herring, R.; Abbeel, P.; Bayen, A. Path and travel time inference from GPS probe vehicle data. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Foundation Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 2009.
- Middleton, D.; Parker, R. Vehicle Detector Evaluation; Report No. FHWA/TX-03 /2119–1; Texas Transportation Institute, Texas Department of Transportation: Austin, TX, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, D.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Hsiang, C.H.; Lo, C.C.; Lin, H.F.; Lin, B.Y. The optimal sampling period of a fingerprint positioning algorithm for vehicle speed estimation. Math. Probl. Eng. 2013, 2013, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheu, R.L.; Xie, C.; Lee, D.H. Probe vehicle population and sample size for arterial speed estimation. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2002, 17, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrera, J.C.; Work, D.B.; Herring, R.; Ban, X.J.; Jacoboson, Q.; Bayen, A.M. Evaluation of traffic data obtained via GPS-enabled mobile phones: The mobile century field experiment. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 2010, 18, 568–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, M.F.; Chen, C.H.; Lin, Y.B.; Chia, C.Y. The frequency of CFVD speed report for highway traffic. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2015, 15, 879–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.Y.; Chou, L.D.; Tung, C.F.; Huang, S.M.; Wang, T.W. Average-Speed Forecast and Adjustment via VANETs. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2013, 62, 4318–4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maerivoet, S.; Logghe, S. Validation of travel times based on cellular floating vehicle data. In Proceedings of the 6th European Congress and Exhibition on Intelligent Transport Systems and Services, Aalborg, Denmark, 18–20 June 2007.
- Lin, Y.B.; Pang, A.C. Wireless and Mobile All-IP Networks; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- ETSI. Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+); Mobile radio interface layer 3 specification, GSM 04.08; European Telecommunications Standards Institute: Sophia Antipolis, France, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- ETSI. Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+), Handover procedures, GSM 03.09 version 5.1.0; European Telecommunications Standards Institute: Sophia Antipolis, France, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 3GPP Technical Specification Group (TSG) Services and System Aspects, TS 22.071, Location Services (LCS); Service description; Stage 1 (Release 9), version 9.1.0. 2010. Available online: http://www.3gpp.org/specifications-groups (accessed on 2 February 2016).
- Chen, C.H. Traffic Information Estimation Methods Based on Cellular Network Data. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Information Management and Finance, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ernst, I.; Sujew, S.; Thiessenhusen, K.U.; Hetscher, M.; Rassmann, S.; Ruhe, M. LUMOS-airborne traffic monitoring system. In Proceedings of the 6th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Shanghai, China, 12–15 October 2003; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2003; Volume 1, pp. 753–759. [Google Scholar]
- Birle, C.; Wermuth, M. The traffic online project. In Proceedings of the 13th ITS World Congress, London, UK, 8–12 October 2006.
- Caceres, N.; Wideberg, J.P.; Benitez, F.G. Review of traffic data estimations extracted from cellular networks. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2008, 2, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caceres, N.; Romero, L.M.; Benitez, F.G.; del Castillo, J.M. Traffic flow estimation models using cellular phone data. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syste. 2012, 13, 1430–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, T.H.; Lai, W.K.; Chen, C.H. A traffic speed estimation model base on using location update events. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Network and Mobile Computing, Beijing, China, 22–24 September 2013.
- Lai, W.K.; Kuo, T.H.; Chen, C.H.; Lee, D.R. A vehicle speed estimation mechanism using handovers and call arrivals of cellular networks. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 8–10 December 2014; pp. 19–26.
- Chen, W.J.; Chen, C.H.; Lin, B.Y.; Lo, C.C. A traffic information prediction system based on global position system-equipped probe car reporting. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2012, 16, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, Z.; Zhao, D.; Xia, Y. Urban road traffic speed estimation for missing probe vehicle data based on multiple linear regression model. In Proceedings of the 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Hague, The Netherlands, 6–9 Octomber 2013; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 118–123. [Google Scholar]
- Antoniou, C.; Koutsopoulos, H.N.; Yannis, G. Dynamic data-driven local traffic state estimation and prediction. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 2013, 34, 89–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, C.C.; Zhou, X. Short-term highway traffic state prediction using structural state space models. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Technol. Plan. Oper. 2014, 18, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fei, X.; Lu, C.C.; Liu, K. A Bayesian dynamic linear model approach for real-time short-term freeway travel time prediction. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 2011, 19, 1306–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Ma, J.; Guan, W.; Song, Y.; Niu, H. Bus arrival time prediction based on the k-nearest neighbor method. In Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization, Harbin, China, 23–26 June 2012; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 480–483. [Google Scholar]
- Baptista, A.T.; Bouillet, E.P.; Pompey, P. Towards an uncertainty aware short-term travel time prediction using GPS bus data: Case study in Dublin. In Proceedings of the 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Anchorage, AK, USA, 16–19 September 2012; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 1620–1625. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, S.; Rim, H.; Oh, C.; Jeong, E.; Kim, Y. Multiple-step traffic speed forecasting strategy for winter freeway operations. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2015, 2482, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chien, S.I.J.; Ding, Y.Q.; Wei, C.H. Dynamic bus arrival time prediction with artificial neural networks. J. Transp. Eng. 2002, 128, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodge, V.J.; Krishnan, R.; Austin, J.; Polak, J.; Jackson, T. Short-term prediction of traffic flow using a binary neural network. Neural Comput. Appl. 2014, 25, 1639–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Lint, J.W. Reliable real-time framework for short-term freeway travel time prediction. J. Transp. Eng. 2006, 132, 921–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Tao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Wang, Y. Long short-term memory neural network for traffic speed prediction using remote microwave sensor data. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 2015, 54, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, H.C.; Chen, C.H.; Lin, B.Y.; Kung, H.Y.; Lo, C.C. Traffic information estimation using periodic location update events. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control 2013, 9, 2031–2041. [Google Scholar]
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lai, W.-K.; Kuo, T.-H.; Chen, C.-H. Vehicle Speed Estimation and Forecasting Methods Based on Cellular Floating Vehicle Data. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6020047
Lai W-K, Kuo T-H, Chen C-H. Vehicle Speed Estimation and Forecasting Methods Based on Cellular Floating Vehicle Data. Applied Sciences. 2016; 6(2):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6020047
Chicago/Turabian StyleLai, Wei-Kuang, Ting-Huan Kuo, and Chi-Hua Chen. 2016. "Vehicle Speed Estimation and Forecasting Methods Based on Cellular Floating Vehicle Data" Applied Sciences 6, no. 2: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6020047
APA StyleLai, W. -K., Kuo, T. -H., & Chen, C. -H. (2016). Vehicle Speed Estimation and Forecasting Methods Based on Cellular Floating Vehicle Data. Applied Sciences, 6(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6020047