Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.3115/981863.981902dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

An information structural approach to spoken language generation

Published: 24 June 1996 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents an architecture for the generation of spoken monologues with contextually appropriate intonation. A two-tiered information structure representation is used in the high-level content planning and sentence planning stages of generation to produce efficient, coherent speech that makes certain discourse relationships, such as explicit contrasts, appropriately salient. The system is able to produce appropriate intonational patterns that cannot be generated by other systems which rely solely on word class and given/new distinctions.

References

[1]
Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and Its Uses. Stanford University Press.
[2]
Culicover, P. and Rochemont, M. (1983). Stress and focus in English. Language, 59:123--165.
[3]
Dale, R. and Haddock, N. (1991). Content determination in the generation of referring expressions. Computational Intelligence, 7(4):252--265.
[4]
Davis, J. and Hirschberg, J. (1988). Assigning intonational features in synthesized spoken discourse. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 187--193, Buffalo.
[5]
Engdahl, E. and Vallduví, E. (1994). Information packaging and grammar architecture: A constraint-based approach. In Engdahl, E., editor, Integrating Information Structure into Constraint-Based and Categorial Approaches (DYANA-2 Report R.1.3.B). CLLI, Amsterdam.
[6]
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., and Weinstein, S. (1986). Towards a computational theory of discourse interpretation. Unpublished manuscript.
[7]
Gussenhoven, C. (1983b). On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accent. Foris, Dodrecht.
[8]
Halliday, M. (1970). Language structure and language function. In Lyons, J., editor, New Horizons in Linguistics, pages 140--165. Penguin.
[9]
Hirschberg, J. (1990). Accent and discourse context: Assigning pitch accent in synthetic speech. In Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 952--957.
[10]
Hoffman, B. (1995). The Computational Analysis of the Syntax and Interpretation of 'Free' Word Order in Turkish. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
[11]
Hovy, E. (1993). Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations. Artificial Intelligence, 63:341--385.
[12]
Mann, W. and Thompson, S. (1986). Rhetorical structure theory: Description and construction of text structures. In Kempen, G., editor, Natural Language Generation: New Results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology and Linguistics, pages 279--300. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
[13]
McKeown, K., Kukich, K., and Shaw, J. (1994). Practical issues in automatic documentation generation. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACL Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 7--14, Stuttgart. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[14]
McKeown, K. R. (1985). Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[15]
Meteer, M. (1991). Bridging the generation gap between text planning and linguistic realization. Computational Intelligence, 7(4):296--304.
[16]
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
[17]
Prevost, S. (1995). A Semantics of Contrast and Information Structure for Specifying Intonation in Spoken Language Generation. PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
[18]
Prevost, S. and Steedman, M. (1993). Generating contextually appropriate intonation. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 332--340, Utrecht.
[19]
Prevost, S. and Steedman, M. (1994). Specifying intonation from context for speech synthesis. Speech Communication, 15:139--153.
[20]
Rambow, O. and Korelsky, T. (1992). Applied text generation. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP-1992), pages 40--47.
[21]
Reiter, E. and Mellish, C. (1992). Using classification to generate text. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 265--272.
[22]
Robin, J. (1993). A revision-based generation architecture for reporting facts in their historical context. In Horacek, H. and Zock, M., editors, New Concepts in Natural Language Generation: Planning, Realization and Systems, pages 238--265. Pinter Publishers, New York.
[23]
Rochemont, M. (1986). Focus in Generative Grammar. John Benjamins, Philadelphia.
[24]
Sibun, P. (1991). The Local Organization and Incremental Generation of Text. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts.
[25]
Steedman, M. (1991a). Structure and intonation. Language, pages 260--296.

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)Collective classification for fine-grained information statusProceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers - Volume 110.5555/2390524.2390637(795-804)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2012
  • (2009)Incorporating information status into generation rankingProceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 2 - Volume 210.5555/1690219.1690261(817-825)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2009
  • (2004)Converting text into agent animationsProceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004: Short Papers10.5555/1613984.1614023(153-156)Online publication date: 2-May-2004
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ACL '96: Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
June 1996
399 pages
  • Program Chairs:
  • Aravind Joshi,
  • Martha Palmer

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 24 June 1996

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 85 of 443 submissions, 19%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)Collective classification for fine-grained information statusProceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers - Volume 110.5555/2390524.2390637(795-804)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2012
  • (2009)Incorporating information status into generation rankingProceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 2 - Volume 210.5555/1690219.1690261(817-825)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2009
  • (2004)Converting text into agent animationsProceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004: Short Papers10.5555/1613984.1614023(153-156)Online publication date: 2-May-2004
  • (2004)Enriching agent animations with gestures and highlighting effectsProceedings of the Second international conference on Intelligent Media Technology for Communicative Intelligence10.1007/11558637_10(91-98)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2004
  • (1997)Corpus--based information presentation for a spoken public transport information systemInteractive Spoken Dialog Systems on Bringing Speech and NLP Together in Real Applications10.5555/1641462.1641481(106-113)Online publication date: 11-Jul-1997

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media