Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.3115/980691.980752dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

A descriptive characterization of tree-adjoining languages: (project note)

Published: 10 August 1998 Publication History

Abstract

Since the early Sixties and Seventies it has been known that the regular and context-free languages are characterized by definability in the monadic second-order theory of certain structures. More recently, these descriptive characterizations have been used to obtain complexity results for constraint- and principle-based theories of syntax and to provide a uniform model-theoretic framework for exploring the relationship between theories expressed in disparate formal terms. These results have been limited, to an extent, by the lack of descriptive characterizations of language classes beyond the context-free. Recently, we have shown that tree-adjoining languages (in a mildly generalized form) can be characterized by recognition by automata operating on three-dimensional tree manifolds, a three-dimensional analog of trees. In this paper, we exploit these automata-theoretic results to obtain a characterization of the tree-adjoining languages by definability in the monadic second-order theory of these three-dimensional tree manifolds. This not only opens the way to extending the tools of model-theoretic syntax to the level of TALs, but provides a highly flexible mechanism for defining TAGs in terms of logical constraints.

References

[1]
M. Biehl, N. Klarlund, and T. Rauhe. 1996. Algorithms for guided tree automata. In WIA'96, LNCS 1260, London, Ontario.
[2]
J. R. Büchi. 1960. Weak second-order arithmetic and finite automata. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 6: 66--92.
[3]
John Doner. 1970. Tree acceptors and some of their applications. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 4: 406--451.
[4]
Calvin C. Elgot. 1961. Decision problems of finite automata design and related arithmetics. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 98: 21--51.
[5]
Saul Gorn. 1967. Explicit definitions and linguistic dominoes. In Systems and Computer Science, Proceedings of the Conference held at Univ. of Western Ontario, 1965. Univ. of Toronto Press.
[6]
J. G. Henriksen, J. Jensen, M. Jørgensen, N. Klarlund, R. Paige, T. Rauhe, and A. Sandhol. 1995. MONA: Monadic second-order logic in practice. In TACAS '95, LNCS 1019, Aarhus, Denmark.
[7]
P. Kelb, T. Margaria, M. Mendler, and C. Gsottberger. 1997. MOSEL: A flexible toolset for monadic second-order logic. In TACAS '97, LNCS 1217, Enschede, The Netherlands.
[8]
Uwe Mönnich. 1997. Adjunction as substitution: An algebraic formulation of regular, context-free and tree adjoining languages. In Formal Grammar, Aix-en-Provence, Fr.
[9]
Frank Morawietz and Tom Cornell. 1997. Representing constraints with automata. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 468--475, Madrid, Spain.
[10]
James Rogers. 1994. Studies in the Logic of Trees with Applications to Grammar Formalisms. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware.
[11]
James Rogers. 1996. A model-theoretic framework for theories of syntax. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 10--16, Santa Cruz, CA.
[12]
James Rogers. 1997a. "Grammarless" phrase structure grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20: 721--746.
[13]
James Rogers. 1997b. On descriptive complexity, language complexity, and GB. In Specifying Syntactic Structures, pages 157--184. CSLI Publications.
[14]
James Rogers. 1997c. A unified notion of derived and derivation structures in TAG. In Proceedings of the Fifth Meeting on Mathematics of Language MOL5 '97, Saarbrücken, FRG.
[15]
James Rogers. 1998. A descriptive characterization of tree-adjoining languages. Technical Report CS-TR-98-01, Univ. of Central Florida. Also available from the CMP-LG repository as paper number cmp-lg/9805008.
[16]
Yves Schabes and Stuart M. Shieber. 1994. An alternative conception of tree-adjoining derivation. Computational Linguistics, 20(1): 91--124.
[17]
J. W. Thatcher and J. B. Wright. 1968. Generalized finite automata theory with an application to a decision problem of second-order logic. Mathematical Systems Theory, 2(1): 57--81.
[18]
Hugo Volger. 1997. Principle languages and principle based parsing. Technical Report 82, SFB 340, Univ. of Tübingen.

Cited By

View all
  • (2007)Some interdefinability results for syntactic constraint classesProceedings of the 10th and 11th Biennial conference on The mathematics of language10.5555/1886644.1886651(72-87)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2007
  1. A descriptive characterization of tree-adjoining languages: (project note)

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    ACL '98/COLING '98: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 2
    August 1998
    768 pages

    Sponsors

    • Government of Canada
    • Université de Montréal

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 August 1998

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 85 of 443 submissions, 19%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2007)Some interdefinability results for syntactic constraint classesProceedings of the 10th and 11th Biennial conference on The mathematics of language10.5555/1886644.1886651(72-87)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2007

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media