Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.3115/1119018.1119058dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagestipsterConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Integration of document detection and information extraction

Published: 06 May 1996 Publication History

Abstract

We have conducted a number of experiments to evaluate various modes of building an integrated detection/extraction system. The experiments were performed using SMART system as baseline. The goal was to determine if advanced information extraction methods can improve recall and precision of document detection. We identified the following two modes of integration:I. Extraction to Detection: broad-coverage extraction1. Extraction step: identify concepts for indexing2. Detection step 1: low recall, high initial precision3. Detection step 2: automatic relevance feedback using top N retrieved documents to regain recall.II. Detection to Extraction: query-specific extraction1. Detection step 1: high recall, low precision run2. Extraction step: learn concept(s) from query and retrieved subcollection3. Detection step 2: re-rank the subcollection to increase precisionOur integration effort concentrated on mode I, and the following issues:1. use of shallow but fast NLP for phrase extractions and disambiguation in place of a full syntactic parser2. use existing MUC-6 extraction capabilities to index a retrieval collection3. mixed Boolean/soft match retrieval model4. create a Universal Spotter algorithm for learning arbitrary concepts

References

[1]
Brown, P., S. Pietra, V. Pietra and R. Mercer. 1991. Word Sense Disambiguation Using Statistical Methods. Proceedings of the 29h Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 264--270.
[2]
Gale, W., K. Church and D. Yarowsky. 1992. A Method for Disambiguating Word Senses in a Large Corpus. Computers and the Humanities, 26, pp. 415--439.
[3]
Harman, D. 1995. Overview of the Third Text REtrieval Conference. Overview of the Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-3), pp. 1--20.
[4]
Strzalkowski, T. 1995. Natural Language Information Retrieval. Information Processing and Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 397--417.
[5]
Yarowsky, D. 1995. Unsupervised Word Sense Disambiguation Rivaling Supervised Methods. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 189--196.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
TIPSTER '96: Proceedings of a workshop on held at Vienna, Virginia: May 6-8, 1996
May 1996
450 pages

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 06 May 1996

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 154
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media