Integration of document detection and information extraction
Pages 195 - 199
Abstract
We have conducted a number of experiments to evaluate various modes of building an integrated detection/extraction system. The experiments were performed using SMART system as baseline. The goal was to determine if advanced information extraction methods can improve recall and precision of document detection. We identified the following two modes of integration:I. Extraction to Detection: broad-coverage extraction1. Extraction step: identify concepts for indexing2. Detection step 1: low recall, high initial precision3. Detection step 2: automatic relevance feedback using top N retrieved documents to regain recall.II. Detection to Extraction: query-specific extraction1. Detection step 1: high recall, low precision run2. Extraction step: learn concept(s) from query and retrieved subcollection3. Detection step 2: re-rank the subcollection to increase precisionOur integration effort concentrated on mode I, and the following issues:1. use of shallow but fast NLP for phrase extractions and disambiguation in place of a full syntactic parser2. use existing MUC-6 extraction capabilities to index a retrieval collection3. mixed Boolean/soft match retrieval model4. create a Universal Spotter algorithm for learning arbitrary concepts
References
[1]
Brown, P., S. Pietra, V. Pietra and R. Mercer. 1991. Word Sense Disambiguation Using Statistical Methods. Proceedings of the 29h Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 264--270.
[2]
Gale, W., K. Church and D. Yarowsky. 1992. A Method for Disambiguating Word Senses in a Large Corpus. Computers and the Humanities, 26, pp. 415--439.
[3]
Harman, D. 1995. Overview of the Third Text REtrieval Conference. Overview of the Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-3), pp. 1--20.
[4]
Strzalkowski, T. 1995. Natural Language Information Retrieval. Information Processing and Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 397--417.
[5]
Yarowsky, D. 1995. Unsupervised Word Sense Disambiguation Rivaling Supervised Methods. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 189--196.
Recommendations
Document expansion for image retrieval
RIAO '10: Adaptivity, Personalization and Fusion of Heterogeneous InformationSuccessful information retrieval requires effective matching between the user's search request and the contents of relevant documents. Often the request entered by a user may not use the same topic relevant terms as the authors' of these documents. One ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 1996
450 pages
Publisher
Association for Computational Linguistics
United States
Publication History
Published: 06 May 1996
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 154Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)14
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in