Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.3115/1034678.1034683dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Robust, finite-state parsing for spoken language understanding

Published: 20 June 1999 Publication History

Abstract

Human understanding of spoken language appears to integrate the use of contextual expectations with acoustic level perception in a tightly-coupled, sequential fashion. Yet computer speech understanding systems typically pass the transcript produced by a speech recognizer into a natural language parser with no integration of acoustic and grammatical constraints. One reason for this is the complexity of implementing that integration. To address this issue we have created a robust, semantic parser as a single finite-state machine (FSM). As such, its run-time action is less complex than other robust parsers that are based on either chart or generalized left-right (GLR) architectures. Therefore, we believe it is ultimately more amenable to direct integration with a speech decoder.

References

[1]
S. Abney. 1991. Parsing by chunks. In R. Berwick, S. Abney, and C. Tenny, editors, Principle-Based Parsing. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[2]
S. Abney. 1996. Partial parsing via finite-state cascades. In Proceedings of the ESSLLI '96 Robust Parsing Workshop.
[3]
T. Briscoe and J. Carroll. 1993. Generalized probabilistic LR parsing of natural language (corpora) with unification-based grammars. Computational Linguistics, 19(1): 25--59.
[4]
C. Chelba and F. Jelinek. 1999. Recognition performance of a structured language model. In The Proceedings of Eurospeech '99 (to appear), September.
[5]
J. Gillet and W. Ward. 1998. A language model combining trigrams and stochastic context-free grammars. In Proceedings of ICSLP'98, volume 6, pgs 2319--2322.
[6]
P. J. Hayes, A. G. Hauptmann, J. G. Carbonell, and M. Tomita. 1986. Parsing spoken language: a semantic caseframe approach. In 11th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of Coling '86, pages 587--592.
[7]
P. A. Heeman and J. F. Allen. 1997. Intonational boundaries, speech repairs, and discourse markers: Modeling spoken dialog. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 254--261.
[8]
S. Issar and W. Ward. 1993. Cmu's robust spoken language understanding system. In Eurospeech' 93, pages 2147--2150.
[9]
E. Kaiser, M. Johnston, and P. Heeman. 1999. Profer: Predictive, robust finite-state parsing for spoken language. In Proceedings of ICASSP '99.
[10]
F. C. N. Pereira and R. N. Wright. 1997. Finite-state approximations of phrase-structure grammars. In Emmanuel Roche and Yves Schabes, editors, Finite-State Language Processing, pages 149--173. The MIT Press.
[11]
J. Schalkwyk, L. D. Colton, and M. Fanty. 1996. The CSLU-sh toolkit for automatic speech recognition: Technical report no. CSLU-011-96, August.
[12]
S. Sutton, R. Cole, J. de Villiers, J. Schalkwyk, P. Vermeulen, M. Macon, Y. Yan, E. Kaiser, B. Rundle, K. Shobaki, P. Hosom, A. Kain, J. Wouters, M. Massaro, and M. Cohen. 1998. Universal speech tools: the cslu toolkit". In Proceedings of ICSLP '98, pages 3221--3224, Nov.
[13]
M. Tomita. 1986. Efficient Parsing for Natural Language: A Fast Algorithm for Practical Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[14]
S. R. Young, A. G. Hauptmann, W. H. Ward, E. T. Smith, and P. Werner. 1989. High level knowledge sources in usable speech recognition systems. Communications of the ACM, 32(2): 183--194, February.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ACL '99: Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics
June 1999
642 pages
ISBN:1558606093

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 20 June 1999

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 85 of 443 submissions, 19%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 215
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)77
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media