Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.3115/1073012.1073027dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

From RAGS to RICHES: exploiting the potential of a flexible generation architecture

Published: 06 July 2001 Publication History

Abstract

The RAGS proposals for generic specification of NLG systems includes a detailed account of data representation, but only an outline view of processing aspects. In this paper we introduce a modular processing architecture with a concrete implementation which aims to meet the RAGS goals of transparency and reusability. We illustrate the model with the RICHES system -- a generation system built from simple linguistically-motivated modules.

References

[1]
Lynne Cahill, Christine Doran, Roger Evans, Chris Mellish, Daniel Paiva, Mike Reape, Donia Scott, and Neil Tipper. 1999. In search of a reference architecture for NLG systems. In Proceedings of the Seventh European Natural Language Generation Workshop, Toulouse, France.]]
[2]
Lynne Cahill, Christine Doran, Roger Evans, Chris Mellish, Daniel Paiva, Mike Reape, Donia Scott, and Neil Tipper. 2000. Reinterpretation of an existing NLG system in a Generic Generation Architecture. In Proceedings of the First International Natural Language Generation Conference, pages 69--76, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel.]]
[3]
Jo Calder, Roger Evans, Chris Mellish, and Mike Reape. 1999. "Free choice" and templates: how to get both at the same time. In "May I speak freely?" Between templates and free choice in natural language generation, number D-99-01, pages 19--24. Saarbrücken.]]
[4]
John Carroll, Ann Copestake, Dan Flickinger, and Victor Poznanski. 1999. An efficient chart generator for (semi-)lexicalist grammars. In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (EWNLG'99), pages 86--95, Toulouse, France.]]
[5]
Ann Copestake and Dan Flickinger. 2000. An open source grammar development environment and broad-coverage English grammar using HPSG. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Athens, Greece.]]
[6]
Michael Elhadad, Kathleen McKeown, and Jacques Robin. 1997. Floating constraints in lexical choice. Computational Linguistics, 23(2):195--240.]]
[7]
K. Inui, T. Tokunaga, and H. Tanaka. 1992. Text revision: A model and its implementation. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rosner, and O. Stock, editors, Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation, number LNAI 587. Springer-Verlag.]]
[8]
B. Lavoie and O. Rambow. 1997. A fast and portable realizer for text generation systems. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 265--68, Washington, DC.]]
[9]
Chris Mellish, Roger Evans, Lynne Cahill, Christy Doran, Daniel Paiva, Mike Reape, Donia Scott, and Neil Tipper. 2000. A representation for complex and evolving data dependencies in generation. In Language Technology Joint Conference, ANLP-NAACL2000, Seattle.]]
[10]
V. O. Mittal, J. D. Moore, G. Carenini, and S. Roth. 1999. Describing complex charts in natural language: A caption generation system. Computation Linguistics.]]
[11]
Richard Power. 2000. Planning texts by constraint satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-2000), pages 642--648, Saarbrücken, Germany.]]
[12]
RAGS. 2000. Towards a Reference Architecture for Natural Language Generation Systems. Technical report, Information Technology Research Institute (ITRI), University of Brighton. Available at http://www.itti.brighton.ac.uk/projects/rags.]]
[13]
Ehud Reiter. 1994. Has a consensus NL generation architecture appeared and is it psycholinguistically plausible? In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 163--170, Kennebunkport, Maine.]]
[14]
J. Robin. 1994. Revision-Based Generation of Natural Language Summaries Providing Historical Background:Corpus-Based Analysis, Design, Implementation and Evaluation. Technical Report CUCS-034-94, Columbia University.]]
[15]
K. van Deemter. 1999. Document generation and picture retrieval. In Procs. of Third Int. Conf. on Visual Information Systems (VISUAL-99), Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science no. 1614, pages 632--640, Amsterdan, Netherlands.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2006)A Reference Architecture for Natural Language Generation SystemsNatural Language Engineering10.1017/S135132490600410412:1(1-34)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2006
  • (2005)Empirically-based control of natural language generationProceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics10.3115/1219840.1219848(58-65)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2005
  1. From RAGS to RICHES: exploiting the potential of a flexible generation architecture

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    ACL '01: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
    July 2001
    562 pages

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 July 2001

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 85 of 443 submissions, 19%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2006)A Reference Architecture for Natural Language Generation SystemsNatural Language Engineering10.1017/S135132490600410412:1(1-34)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2006
    • (2005)Empirically-based control of natural language generationProceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics10.3115/1219840.1219848(58-65)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2005

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media