Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a leading cause of early
post-transplant kidney damage. Furthermore, acute tubular necrosis (ATN) is
appointed as the most prevalent form of AKI, a frequent multifactorial process
associated with high morbidity and mortality, yet giving rise to delayed graft
function (DGF) and, ultimately, allograft dysfunction. Common factors such as
prolonged cold ischemia time, advanced donor age, cadaveric versus living donor,
donor history of hypertension, as well as donation after cardiac death have all
been deemed risk factors for ATN. With the increasing number of older cadaveric
and cardiac donors in the donation process, ATN could have a detrimental impact
on patient welfare. Therefore understanding the underlying process would benefit
the transplant outcome. We aimed to prospectively monitor several T cell subsets
in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTrs) to investigate whether there
is an adaptive immune-mediated involvement in the ATN process. Methods:
Peripheral blood was collected from 31 KTrs at different time points within the
first-year post-transplantation for in vitro stimulation with
Concanavalin-A (Con-A) in a humidified 5% CO incubator at 37
°C for 72 hours. Upon cell stimulation, flow cytometry was
applied to quantify the surface expression through the median fluorescence
intensity (MFI) of CD4CD25, CD8CD25, CD4CD38,
CD8CD38, CD4CD154, CD8CD154,
CD4CD69, CD8CD69, CD4CD95, and
CD8CD95 T cells. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS
Statistics IBM v.25 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). MFIs values were compared using
a univariate analysis by a nonparametric U-Mann Whitney test. ROC analysis was
applied to define cut-off values most capable of stratifying patients at high
risk of ATN. Spearman’s rank-order coefficient test was applied to correlate
biomarkers with allograft function. Multivariate regression independently
validated CD8 T lymphocytes as surrogate biomarkers of ATN. A
p-value 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: KTrs who developed ATN upon transplantation had significantly
higher expression of CD25, CD69, and CD95 on CD8 and lower expression of
CD95 on CD4 T lymphocytes than patients with stable graft function. ROC
curve analysis showed that MFIs 1015.20 for CD8CD25,
2489.05 for CD8CD69, 4257.28 for CD8CD95,
and 1581.98 for CD4CD95 were capable of stratifying KTrs at
high risk of ATN. Furthermore, patients with an MFI below any cut-off were
significantly less likely to develop ATN than those with other values. The
allograft function was correlated with the
CD4CD95/CD8CD95 ratio in KTrs who developed ATN. The
multivariate analysis confirmed that, within the first-month post-transplant, MFI
values of CD8CD25, CD4CD95, and CD8CD95 T
lymphocytes, along with donor age, serum creatinine, and GFR were independent
risk factors to ATN. Moreover, we were also able to corroborate previous immune
factors of importance in immune-mediated response to the allograft, such as the
patient’s maximum panel reactive antibody (PRA) or the maintenance
immunosuppression therapy. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate evidence
for the implication of CD8 T lymphocytes in the development of ATN early in
the post-transplant phase. Post-transplant monitoring of activated CD8 T
lymphocytes may help identify which patients require further clinical
intervention to prevent graft damage.