Article

Collision warning design to mitigate driver distraction

Authors:

Joshua D. Hoffman,

Elizabeth HayesAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 65 - 72

https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985701

Published: 25 April 2004 Publication History

Abstract

As computers and other information technology move into cars and trucks, distraction-related crashes are likely to become an important problem. This paper begins to address this problem by examining how alert strategy (graded and single-stage) and alert modality (haptic and auditory) affect how well collision warning systems mitigate distraction and direct drivers attention to the car ahead when it unexpectedly brakes. We conducted two experiments in which drivers interacted with an in-vehicle email system and a collision warning system signaled a braking lead vehicle. The first experiment showed that graded alerts led to a greater safety margin and a lower rate of inappropriate responses to nuisance warnings. A second experiment focused on attitudes toward the collision warning system and found that graded alerts were more trusted than single stage alerts and that haptic alerts, a vibrating seat in these experiments, were perceived as less annoying and more appropriate. Graded haptic alerts offer a promising approach to developing context aware computing in a safety-critical application.

References

[1]

Ashley, S. Driving the info highway Scientific American, 2001.

[2]

Bliss, J. and Acton, S.A. Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. Applied Ergonomics, 34. 499--509.

[3]

Bliss, J.P. and Dunn, M.C. Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload. Ergonomics, 43 (9). 1283-1300.

[4]

Brown, I.D., Tickner, A.H. and Simmonds, D.C.V. Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53 (5). 419--424.

[5]

Brown, T.L., Lee, J.D. and McGehee, D.V. Human performance models and rear-end collision avoidance algorithms. Human Factors, 43 (3). 462--482.

[6]

Burgett, A.L., Carter, A., Miller, R.J., Najm, W.G. and Smith, D.L. A collision warning algorithm for rear-end collisions, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, 1998.

[7]

Diederich, A. Intersensory facilitation of reaction-time: Evaluation of counter and diffusion coactivation models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39 (2). 197--215.

Digital Library

[8]

Gielen, S.C.A.M. and Schnidt, R.A. On the nature of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Perception and Psychophysics, 34. 161--168.

[9]

Gupta, N., Bisantz, A.M. and Singh, T. The effects of adverse condition warning system characteristics on driver performance: an investigation of alarm signal type and threshold level. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21 (4). 235--248.

[10]

Haigney, D. and Westerman, S.J. Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: a critical review of research methodology. Ergonomics, 44 (2). 132--143.

[11]

Janssen, W. and Nilsson, L. Behavioural effects of driver support. in Parkes, A.M. and Franzen, S. eds. Driving Future Vehicles, Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C., 1993, 147--155.

[12]

Kiefer, R., LeBlanc, D., Palmer, M., Salinger, J., Deering, R. and Shulman, M. Development and validation of functional definitions and evaluation procedures for collision warning/avoidance systems, Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership, Washington DC, 1999.

[13]

Lee, J.D., Caven, B., Haake, S. and Brown, T.L. Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: The effect of speech-based e-mail on drivers' attention to the road. Human Factors, 43 (4). 631-640.

[14]

Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L. and Reyes, M.L. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors, 44 (2). 314--334.

[15]

Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L. and Reyes, M.L. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors, 44 (2). 314--334.

[16]

Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L. and Reyes, M.L. Driver Distraction, Warning Algorithm Parameters, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-end Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, 2002.

[17]

Lee, J.D. and See, K.A. Trust in technology: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors.

[18]

McCrickard, D.S., Chewar, C.M., Somervell, J.P. and Ndiwalana, A. A Model for Notification Systems Evaluation: Toward Assessing Usability for Multitasking Activity.

[19]

McCrickard, D.S., Czerwinski, M. and Bartram, L. Introduction: design and evaluation of notification user interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58 (5). 509--514.

Digital Library

[20]

Nickerson, R.S. Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement? Psychological Review, 80. 489--509.

[21]

Parasuraman, R., Hancock, P.A. and Olofinboba, O. Alarm effectiveness in driver-centred collision-warning systems. Ergonomics, 40 (3). 390--399.

[22]

Peters, G.A. and Peters, B.J. The distracted driver. Journal of the Royal Society For the Promotion of Health, 121 (1). 23--28.

[23]

Raby, M., McGehee, D.V., Lee, J.D. and Norse, G.E. Defining the interface for a snowplow lane tracking device using a systems-based approach. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 3. 369--372.

[24]

Sklar, A.E. and Sarter, N.B. Good vibrations: Tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains. Human Factors, 41 (4). 543--552.

[25]

Sorkin, R.D., Kantowitz, B.H. and Kantowitz, S.C. Likelihood alarm displays. Human Factors, 30. 445--459.

Digital Library

[26]

Tijerina, L., Jackson, J.L., Pomerleau, D.A., Romano, R.A. and Peterson, A. Run-Off Road Collision Avoidance Using IVHS Countermeasures: Task 3 Report - Volume II, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1995.

[27]

Tijerina, L., Johnston, S., Parmer, E., Pham, H.A., Winterbottom, M.D. and Barickman, F.S. Preliminary Studies in Haptic Displays for Rear-end Collision Avoidance System and Adaptive Cruise Control Applications, National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, Washington, DC, 2000.

[28]

Todd, J.W. Reaction time to multiple stimuli. Archives of Psychology, 3. 1--65.

Cited By

Einhäuser WNeubert CGrimm SBendixen A(2024)High visual salience of alert signals can lead to a counterintuitive increase of reaction timesScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-58953-414:1Online publication date: 17-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58953-4
Lee DPark JKang JYun TPark DChoi S(2024)Participatory Design for In-Vehicle Vibrotactile Warnings on Driver’s SeatHaptics: Understanding Touch; Technology and Systems; Applications and Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-70061-3_29(358-371)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70061-3_29
Einziger GHimelbrand OWaisbard E(2023)Boosting Cache Performance by Access Time MeasurementsACM Transactions on Storage10.1145/357277819:1(1-29)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3572778
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Collision warning design to mitigate driver distraction
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Driver Choices of Time-to-Collision Thresholds for a Collision Warning System
ECCE '16: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics

Collision warning systems (CWS) lower the risk of rear-end collisions by alerting drivers of imminent impacts (e.g., by sound). However, if warnings are perceived to be too far ahead of possible collisions, drivers may view them as annoying and ...
An Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Framework Design Based on Driver Distraction
Forward Collision Warning (FCW) is a promising Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) to mitigate rear-end collisions. The deterministic FCW approaches may occasionally lead to the issuance of annoying false warnings, as they cannot be individualized ...
The Paradox of Driving-Related Distraction: Driver Monitoring Systems Trigger Warnings During Overtaking Maneuvers
AutomotiveUI '24 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

Driver Monitoring Systems (DMS) detect visual distraction and alert drivers to maintain focus on the road. The European New Car Assessment Programme developed an algorithm that triggers warnings upon detecting distraction. Previous research showed that ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2004

742 pages

ISBN:1581137028

DOI:10.1145/985692

Conference Chairs:
Elizabeth Dykstra-Erickson
Kinoma
,
Manfred Tscheligi
CURE, Austria

Copyright © 2004 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 April 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

CHI04

Sponsor:

CHI04: CHI 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 24 - 29, 2004

Vienna, Austria

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

131
Total Citations
View Citations
3,018
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)85
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Einhäuser WNeubert CGrimm SBendixen A(2024)High visual salience of alert signals can lead to a counterintuitive increase of reaction timesScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-58953-414:1Online publication date: 17-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58953-4
Lee DPark JKang JYun TPark DChoi S(2024)Participatory Design for In-Vehicle Vibrotactile Warnings on Driver’s SeatHaptics: Understanding Touch; Technology and Systems; Applications and Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-70061-3_29(358-371)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70061-3_29
Einziger GHimelbrand OWaisbard E(2023)Boosting Cache Performance by Access Time MeasurementsACM Transactions on Storage10.1145/357277819:1(1-29)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3572778
Wu SLi JSousa MGrossman T(2023)Investigating Guardian Awareness Techniques to Promote Safety in Virtual Reality2023 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR55154.2023.00078(631-640)Online publication date: Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/VR55154.2023.00078
Wu RChen H(2023)The Effect of Visual and Auditory Modality Mismatching between Distraction and Warning on Pedestrian Street Crossing Behavior2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00121(1045-1054)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00121
van Berkel NSarsenbayeva ZGoncalves J(2023)The methodology of studying fairness perceptions in Artificial IntelligenceInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102954170:COnline publication date: 8-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102954
Liu SWu BMa SYang Z(2023)Advanced Audio-Visual Multimodal Warnings for Drivers: Effect of Specificity and Lead Time on EffectivenessEngineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics10.1007/978-3-031-35389-5_32(467-484)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35389-5_32
Lehto MNanda G(2023)Safety Warnings for AutomationSpringer Handbook of Automation10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_29(661-679)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_29
Bauchwitz BCummings M(2022)Effects of Individual Vehicle Differences on Advanced Driver-Assist System Takeover Alert BehaviorTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board10.1177/036119812110683622676:5(489-499)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211068362
Horberry TMulvihill CFitzharris MLawrence BLenne MKuo JWood D(2022)Human-Centered Design for an In-Vehicle Truck Driver Fatigue and Distraction Warning SystemIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2021.305309623:6(5350-5359)Online publication date: Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3053096
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents