Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/800061.808766acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

The random access hierarchy

Published: 01 December 1983 Publication History

Abstract

To be considered fast, algorithms for operations on large data structures should operate in polylog time, i.e., with the number of steps bounded by a polynomial in log(N) where N is the size of the data structure. Example: an ordered list of reasonably short strings can be searched in log2 (N) time via binary search. To measure the time and space complexity of such operations, the usual Turing machine with its serial-access input tape is replaced by a random access model. To compare such problems and define completeness, the appropriate relation is loglog reducibility: the relation generated by random-access transducers whose work tapes have length at most log(log(N)). The surprise is that instead of being a refinement of the standard log space, polynomial time, polynomial space, ... hierarchy, the complexity classes for these random-access Turing machines form a distinct parallel hierarchy, namely, polylog time, polylog space, exppolylog time, ... . Propositional truth evaluation, context-free language recognition and searching a linked list are complete for polylog space. Searching ordered lists and searching unordered lists are complete for polylog time and nondeterministic polylog time respectively. In the serial-access hierarchy, log-space reducibility is not fine enough to classify polylog-time problems and there can be no complete problems for polylog space even with polynomial-time Turing reducibility

References

[1]
AHO, A., HOPCROFT, J., and ULLMAN, J. THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF COMPUTER ALGORITHMS. Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass. 1974, pp. 97-99.
[2]
BOOK, R. Comparing complexity classes. J. COMPUT. SYS. SCI. 9(1974), 213-229.
[3]
BOOK, R. Translational lemmas, polynomial time, and (logn)@@@@-space. THEOR. COMPUT. SCI. 1 (1976), 215-226.
[4]
BORODIN, A. On relating time and space to size and depth. SIAM J. COMPUT. 6 (1977), 733-744.
[5]
CHANDRA, A., KOZEN, D., and STOCKMEYER, L. Alternation. J. ACM 28 (1981), 114-133.
[6]
COBHAM, A. The intrinsic computational difficulty of functions. PROC. 1964 INTERNAT. CONGR. FOR LOGIC, METH., AND PHILO. OF SCI., North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 24-30.
[7]
COOK, S. Path systems and language recognition. 2nd ANN. ACM SYMP. ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, 1970, pp. 70-72.
[8]
COOK, S. The complexity of theorem proving procedures. 3rd ANN. ACM SYMP. ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, New York, 1971a, pp. 151-158.
[9]
COOK, S. Characterizations of pushdown machines in terms of time-bounded computers. J. ACM 18 (1971b), 4-18.
[10]
COOK, S. A hierarchy for nondeterministic time complexity, J. COMPUT. SYS. SCI. 7 (1973), 343-353.
[11]
COOK, S. An observation on time-storage trade off. J. COMPUT. SYS. SCI. 9 (1974), 308-316.
[12]
COOK, S. Deterministic CFL's are accepted simultaneously in polynomial time and log squared space. PROC. 11th ACM SYMP. ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, 1979, pp. 338-345.
[13]
CSANKY, L. Fast parallel matrix inversion algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 5 (1976), 618-623.
[14]
HARTMANIS, J. On log-tape isomorphisms of complete sets. THEOR. COMPUT. SCI. 7 (1978a), 273-286.
[15]
HARTMANIS, J. FEASIBLE COMPUTATIONS AND PROVABLE COMPLEXITY PROPERTIES. CBMS-NSF Regional Conf. Series in Applied Math. vol. 30, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1978b.
[16]
HARTMANIS, J., IMMERMAN, N., and MAHANEY, S. One-way log-tape reductions. 19th ANN. IEEE SYMP. ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMP. SCI., 1978, pp. 65-72.
[17]
HOPCROFT, J. and ULLMAN, J. FORMAL LANGUAGES AND THEIR RELATION TO AUTOMATA. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969, pp. 148-149.
[18]
HOPCROFT, J. and ULLMAN, J. INTRO. TO AUTOMATA THEORY, LANGUAGES AND COMPUTATION. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1979, pp. 285-306.
[19]
IBARRA, O. Characterizations of some tape and time complexity classes of Turing machines in terms of multihead and auxillary stack automata. J. COMPUT. SYS. SCI. 5 (1971), 88-117.
[20]
IBARRA, O. A note concerning nondeterministic tape complexities. J. ACM 19 (1972), 608-612.
[21]
IBARRA, O. and CHAN, T. On the space and time complexity of functions computable by simple programs. Technical Report 81-36, 1981, Dept. of Computer Sci., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
[22]
JONES, N. Space-bounded reducibility among combinatorial problems, J. COMPUT. SYS. SCI. 11 (1975), 68-85.
[23]
JONES, N., LIEN, Y., and LAASER, W. New problems complete for nondeterministic log space. MATH. SYS. THEORY 10 (1976), 1-17.
[24]
JONES, N., and LAASER, W. Problems complete for deterministic polynomial time. THEOR. COMPUT. SCI. 3 (1977), 105-117.
[25]
KARP, R. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. COMPLEXITY OF COMPUTER COMPUTATIONS (Miller, R.E., and Thatcher, J. eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1972, pp. 85-104.
[26]
LYNCH, N. Log space recognition and translation of parenthesis languages. J. ACM 24 (1977), 583-590.
[27]
PAUL, W., and REISCHUK, R. On time versus space II. J. COMPUT. SYS. SCI. 22 (1981), 312-327.
[28]
PIPPENGER, N. On simultaneous resource bounds. 20th ANN. SYMP. ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUT. SCI., 1979, pp. 307-311.
[29]
PIPPENGER, N., and FISCHER, M. Relations among complexity measures. J ACM 26 (1979), 361-381.
[30]
PREPARATA, F., and VUILLEMIN, J. The cube-connected cycles: A versatile network for parallel computation. COMM. ACM 24 (1981), 300-309.
[31]
RUZZO, W. Tree-size bounded alternation. J. COMPUT. SYS. SCI. 21 (1980), 218-235.
[32]
RUBY, S. and FISCHER, P. Translational methods and computational complexity. CONF. RECORD IEEE 6th ANN. SYMP. ON SWITCHING CIRCUIT THEORY AND LOGICAL DESIGN, 1965, pp. 173-178.
[33]
RUZZO, W. On uniform circut complexity. J. COMPUT. SYS. SCI. 22 (1981), 365-383.
[34]
SAVITCH, W. Relations between nondeterminisitic and deterministic tape complexities. J. COMPUT. SYS. SCI. 4 (1970), 177-192.
[35]
SAVITCH, W. Nondeterministic Log N space. PROC. 8th ANN. PRINCETON CONF. ON INFORMATION SCIENCES AND SYSTEMS, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1974, pp. 21-23.
[36]
SCHWARTZ, J. Ultracomputers. ACM TANS. ON PROGRAMMING LANG. AND SYS. 2 (1980), 484-521.
[37]
STOCKMEYER, L., and MEYER, A. Word problems requiring exponential time: preliminary report, PROC. FIFTH ANNUAL ACM SYMP. ON THEORY OF COMPUT. (1973), pp. 1-9.
[38]
STOCKMEYER, L. The polynomial-time hierarchy. THEOR. COMPUT. SCI. 3 (1976), 1-22.
[39]
STONE, H. Parallel processing with the perfect shuffle. IEEE TRANS. COMPUT. C-20, 2 (1971), 153-161.
[40]
SUDBOROUGH, H. Time and tape bounded auxiliary pushdown automata, MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 53, Springer-Verlag, Belin/New York, 1977, pp. 493-503.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
STOC '83: Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
December 1983
487 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 1983

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Files
  2. First-order definability
  3. Polylog space
  4. Random access
  5. Sublinear time

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

Upcoming Conference

STOC '25
57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2025)
June 23 - 27, 2025
Prague , Czech Republic

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 95
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)58
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media