Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/638249.638272acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Zooming interfaces!: enhancing the performance of eye controlled pointing devices

Published: 08 July 2002 Publication History

Abstract

This paper quantifies the benefits and usability problems associated with eye-based pointing direct interaction on a standard graphical user interface. It shows where and how, with the addition of a second supporting modality, the typically poor performance and subjective assessment of eye-based pointing devices can be improved to match the performance of other assistive technology devices. It shows that target size is the overriding factor affecting device performance and that when target sizes are artificially increased by 'zooming in' on the interface under the control of a supporting modality then eye-based pointing becomes a viable and usable interaction methodology for people with high-level motor disabilities.

References

[1]
Bates, R. Multimodal Eye-based Interaction for Zoomed Target Selection on a Standard Graphical User Interface, in Proceedings of Interact'99 vol. II 7--8 British Computer Society, 1999.
[2]
Bates, R., Bierton, R. Experimental determination of quantifiers for usability questionnaire design, in Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction 2000 vol. II, 57--58, British Computer Society, 2000.
[3]
Bevan, N., Kirakowski, J., Maissel, J. What is usability?, in Human Aspects in Computing: Design and Use of Interactive Systems and Work with Terminals, Elsevier Science, 1991.
[4]
Bierton, R., Bates, R. Experimental determination of optimal scales for usability questionnaire design, in Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction 2000 vol. II, British Computer Society, 55--56.
[5]
Carpenter, R.H.S. Eye movements, MacMillan, 1991.
[6]
Edwards, G. New Software makes eye tracking viable: You can control computers with your eyes, in Proceedings of CSUN Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference 1998, California State University Northridge.
[7]
Goldberg, J.H. Schryver J.C. Eye-gaze control of the computer interface: disrimination of zoom intent, in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, Human Factors Society, 1993.
[8]
Hart, S. G., Staveland, L. E. Development of the NASA-tlx (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research, in Human Mental Workload, 139--183, Elsevier, 1988.
[9]
Istance, H. Howarth, PA. Keeping an eye on your interface: The potential for eye-based control of graphical user interfaces (GUIs), in Proceedings of HCI'94 People and Computers IX 195--209, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[10]
Istance, H. Spinner, C. Howarth, P.A. Eye-based control of standard GUI software, in Proceedings of People and Computers XI HCI'96 142--158, Springer, 1996.
[11]
Jacob, R.J.K. The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: What you look at is what you get, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 9, 3, 152--169, 1991.
[12]
Jacob, R.J.K. Eye tracking in advanced interface design, in Advanced Interface Design and Virtual Environments, 258--288, Oxford University Press, 1995.
[13]
Lankford, C. Effective eye-gaze input into windows, in Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium 2000, 23--27 ACM press, 2000.
[14]
MacKenzie, I.S., Kauppinen, T., Silfverberg, M. Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices, in Proceedings of CHI 2001, ACM Press.
[15]
Macleod, M., Bowden, R., Bevan, N., Curson, I. The MUSIC performance measurement method, in Behaviour and Information Technology, 16, 4/5, 279--293, Crown, 1997.
[16]
Saito, S. Does fatigue exist in a quantitative measurement of eye movements? Ergonomics 35 5/6, 607--615, 1992.
[17]
Salvucci, D.D. Anderson, J.R. Intelligent gaze-added interfaces, in Proceedings of CHI 2000, 2, ACM Press, 273--280.
[18]
Sibert, L.E. Jacob, R.J.K. Evaluation of eye gaze interaction, in Proceedings of CHI 2000, 2, ACM Press, 281--288.
[19]
Smith, W. J. ISO and ANSI ergonomic standards for computer products: A guide to implementation and compliance. Prentice Hall, New York, 1996.
[20]
Szczur, M. Usability testing - on a budget: a NASA usability test case study. In Behaviour and Information Technology, 13, no. 1 and 2, 106--118, 1994.
[21]
Velichkovsky, B. Sprenger, A. Unema, P. Towards gaze mediated interaction: Collecting solutions of the "midas touch" problem, in Human-Computer Interaction: INTERACT'97, Chapman & Hall, 1997.
[22]
Virzi, R. A. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough? Human Factors, 34, 4, 457--468, 1992.
[23]
Ware, C. Mikaelian, H.H. An evaluation of an eye tracker as a device for computer input, in Proceedings of CHI 1987, 183--188, ACM Press.
[24]
Dolphin Computer Access Ltd. Technology House, Blackpole Estate West, Worcester, WR3 8TJ, UK. www.dolphinuk.co.uk
[25]
Polhemus Incorporated, 40 Hercules Drive, P.O. Box 560, Colchester, VT 05446, USA. www.polhemus.com
[26]
SensoMotoric Instruments GmbH (SMI), Warthestraße 21, D-14513 Teltow/Berlin, Germany. www.smi.de
[27]
Prentke Romich Company, 1022 Heyl Road, Wooster, OH 44691, USA. www.wivik.com
[28]
Yarbus, A.L. Eye Movements and Vision, Plenum, New York, 1967.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluating Target Expansion for Eye Pointing TasksInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwae00436:4(209-223)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2024)The impact of visual and motor space size on gaze-based target selectionAustralian Journal of Psychology10.1080/00049530.2024.230938476:1Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
  • (2022)Design and Evaluation of a Silent Speech-Based Selection Method for Eye-Gaze PointingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35677236:ISS(328-353)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
Assets '02: Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies
July 2002
238 pages
ISBN:1581134649
DOI:10.1145/638249
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 July 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. assistive technology
  2. eye-tracking
  3. graphical user interfaces
  4. pointing devices
  5. zoom screen

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ASSETS02
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Assets '02 Paper Acceptance Rate 31 of 76 submissions, 41%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 29 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluating Target Expansion for Eye Pointing TasksInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwae00436:4(209-223)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2024)The impact of visual and motor space size on gaze-based target selectionAustralian Journal of Psychology10.1080/00049530.2024.230938476:1Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
  • (2022)Design and Evaluation of a Silent Speech-Based Selection Method for Eye-Gaze PointingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35677236:ISS(328-353)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Performance Analysis of Saccades for Primary and Confirmatory Target SelectionProceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3562939.3565619(1-12)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Methodological Standards in Accessibility Research on Motor Impairments: A SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/354350955:7(1-35)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Investigating gaze interaction to support children’s gameplayInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.10034930:COnline publication date: 9-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Gazing at GamesundefinedOnline publication date: 21-Mar-2022
  • (2021)A Heuristic Evaluation of Usability for Environmental Control Units’ Eye-Tracking Interfaces at Veterans Affairs Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders CentersProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/107118132064117164:1(741-745)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2021
  • (2020)Gaze-Adaptive Lenses for Feature-Rich Information SpacesACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3379155.3391323(1-8)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2020
  • (2020)Bubble Gaze Cursor + Bubble Gaze Lens: Applying Area Cursor Technique to Eye-Gaze InterfaceACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3379155.3391322(1-10)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media