Article

A dynamic optimization framework for a Java just-in-time compiler

Authors:

Toshio Suganuma,

Toshiaki Yasue,

Motohiro Kawahito,

Hideaki Komatsu,

Toshio NakataniAuthors Info & Claims

OOPSLA '01: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications

Pages 180 - 195

https://doi.org/10.1145/504282.504296

Published: 01 October 2001 Publication History

Abstract

The high performance implementation of Java Virtual Machines (JVM) and just-in-time (JIT) compilers is directed toward adaptive compilation optimizations on the basis of online runtime profile information. This paper describes the design and implementation of a dynamic optimization framework in a production-level Java JIT compiler. Our approach is to employ a mixed mode interpreter and a three level optimizing compiler, supporting quick, full, and special optimization, each of which has a different set of tradeoffs between compilation overhead and execution speed. a lightweight sampling profiler operates continuously during the entire program's exectuion. When necessary, detailed information on runtime behavior is collected by dynmiacally generating instrumentation code which can be installed to and uninstalled from the specified recompilation target code. Value profiling with this instrumentation mechanism allows fully automatic code specialization to be performed on the basis of specific parameter values or global data at the highest optimization level. The experimental results show that our approach offers high performance and a low code expansion ratio in both program startup and steady state measurements in comparison to the compile-only approach, and that the code specialization can also contribute modest performance improvement

References

[1]

A.R. Adl-Tabatabai, M. Ciemiak, C.Y. Lueh, V.M. Parikh, and J.M. Stichnoth. Fast, Effective Code Generation in a Just-in- Time Java Compiler. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '98 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 280-290, Jun. 1998.]]

Digital Library

[2]

O. Agesen and D. Detlefs. Mixed-mode Byteeode Execution. Technical Report SMLI TR-2000-87, Sun Microsystems, 2000.]]

Digital Library

[3]

M. Arnold, S. Fink, D. Grove, M. Hind, and P.F. Sweeney. Adaptive Optimizations in the Jalapefio JVM. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications, OOPSLA '00, Oct. 2000.]]

Digital Library

[4]

M. Arnold, S. Fink, D. Grove, M. Hind, and P.F. Sweeney. Adaptive Optimizations in the Jalapefio JVM: The Controller's Analytical Model. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization, FDDO-3, Dec. 2000.]]

Digital Library

[5]

M. Arnold, B.G. Ryder. A Framework for Reducing the Cost of Instrumented Code. In Proceedings of the A CM SIGPLAN '01 Conference on Program Language Design and Implementation, pp. 168-179, Jun. 2001.]]

Digital Library

[6]

J. Auslander, M. Philipose, C. Chambers, S.J. Eggers, and B.N. Bershad. Fast, Effective Dynamic Compilation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '96 Conference on Programming Language Design andlmplementation, pp. 149-158, May 1996.]]

Digital Library

[7]

T. Autrey and M. Wolfe. Initial Results for Glacial Variable Analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing, Aug. 1996.]]

Digital Library

[8]

V. Bala, E. Duesterwald, and S. Banerjia. Dynamo: A Transparent Dynamic Optimization System. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '00 Conference on Programming Language Design andlmplementation, pp. 1-12, Jun. 2000.]]

Digital Library

[9]

R.G. Burger and R.K. Dybvig. An infrastructure for Profile- Driven Dynamic Recompilation, In ICCL '98, the IEEE Computer Society International Conference on Computer Languages, May 1998.]]

Digital Library

[10]

M.G. Burke, J.D. Choi, S. Fink, D. Grove, M. Hind, V. Sarkar, M. Serrano, V.C. Sreedhar, H. Srinivasan, and J. Whaley. The Jalapefio Dynamic Optimizing Compiler for Java, In Proceedings' of the ACM SIGPLAN Java Grande Conference, pp. 129- 141, Jun. 1999]]

Digital Library

[11]

B. Calder, P. Feller, and A. Eustace. Value Profiling. In 30th International Conference on Microarchitecture, pp. 259-269, Dec. 1997.]]

Digital Library

[12]

C. Chambers and D. Ungar. Customization: Optimizing Compiler Technology for SELF, a Dynamically-Typed Object- Oriented Programming Languages. In Proceedings of the A CM SIGPLAN '89 Conference on Programming Language Design andlmplementation, pp. 146-160, Jul. 1989.]]

Digital Library

[13]

M. Ciemiak, G.Y. Lueh, and J.M. Stiehnoth. Practicing JUDO: Java Under Dynamic Optim/zations. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '00 Conference on Programming Language Design andlmplementation, pp. 13-26, Jun. 2000.]]

Digital Library

[14]

C. Consel and F. Noel. A General Approach for Run-Time Specialization and its Application to C. In Conference Record of the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 145-156, Jan. 1996]]

Digital Library

[15]

J. Dean, C. Chambers, and D. Grove. Selective Specialization for Object-Oriented Languages. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '95 Conference on Programming Language Design andlmplementation, pp. 93-102, Jun. 1995.]]

Digital Library

[16]

J. Dean and C. Chambers. Towards Better Inlining Decisions Using Inlining Trials. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '94 Conference on LISP and Functional Programming, pp. 273-282, Jun. 1994.]]

Digital Library

[17]

D. Detlefs and O. Agesen. Inlining of Virtual Methods. In the 13th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, 1999.]]

Digital Library

[18]

J. Gosling, B. Joy, and G. Steele. The Java Language Specification. Addison-Wesley, 1996.]]

Digital Library

[19]

B. Grant, M. Philipose, M. Mock, C. Chambers,and S.J. Eggers. An Evaluation of Staged Run-Time Optimizations in DyC. In Proceedings of the A CM SIGPLAN '99 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 293- 304, May 1999.]]

Digital Library

[20]

U. Holzle. Adaptive Optimization for SELF: Reconciling High Performance with Exploratory Programming. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, CS-TR-94-1520, Aug. 1994.]]

Digital Library

[21]

U, Holzle and D. Ungar. Reconciling responsiveness with performanee in pure object-oriented languages. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and estems, 18(4):355-400, Jul. 1996.]]

Digital Library

[22]

IBM Corporation Inc. "WebSphere Software Platform", documentation available at http://www.ibn~eom/websphere 2000.]]

[23]

K. Ishizaki, M. Kawahito, T. Yasue, M. Takeuehi, Y. Ogasawara, T. Suganuma, T. Onodera, H. Komatsu, and T. Nakatani. Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Optimizations in a Just-In-Time Compiler. In Proceedings of ACM SIGPLAN Java Grande Conference, pp. 119-128, Jun. 1999.]]

Digital Library

[24]

K. Ishizaki, M. Kawahito, T. Yasue, H. Komatsu, and T. Nakatani. A Study of Devirtualization Techniques for a Java Just-In- Time Compiler. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications, OOPSLA '00, pp. 294-310, Oct. 2000.]]

Digital Library

[25]

Just System Corp. "IchitaroArk for Java", available at http://www.justsystem.corn/arldindex.html 1998.]]

[26]

M. Kawahito, H. Komatsu, and T. Nakatani. Effective Null Pointer Check Elimination Utilizing Hardware Trap. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Architectural Support on Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Nov. 2000.]]

Digital Library

[27]

A. Krall. Efficient JavaVM Just-in-Time Compilation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation Technique, Oct. 1998.]]

Digital Library

[28]

R. Marlet, C. Consel, and P. Boinot. Efficient Incremental Run-Time Specialization for Free. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '99 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 281-292, Jun. 1999.]]

Digital Library

[29]

T. Ogasawara, H. Komatsu, and T. Nakatani. A Study of Exception Handling and its Dynamic Optimization for Java. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object- Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications, OOPSLA '01, Oct. 2001.]]

Digital Library

[30]

M. Paleezny, C. Viek, and C. Click. The Java HotSpot Server Compiler. In Proceedings of the Java Virtual Machine Research and Technology Symposium (JVM '01), pp. 1-12, Apr. 2001.]]

Digital Library

[31]

M.P. Plezbert and R.K. Cytron. Does "Just in Time" = "Better Late than Never"?. In Conference Record of the 24th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 120-131, Jan. 1997.]]

Digital Library

[32]

M. Poletto, D. Engler, and M.F. Kaashoek. tee: A System for Fast, Flexible, and High-Level Dynamic Code Generation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN'97 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 109-121, Jun. 1997.]]

Digital Library

[33]

V.C. Sreedhar, M. Burke, and J.D. Choi. A Framework for In. terprocedural Optimization in the Presence of Dynamic Class Loading. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '00 Conference of Program Language Design and Implementation, pp. 196-207, Jun. 2000.]]

Digital Library

[34]

M.D. Smith. Overcoming the Challenges to Feedback-Directed Optimization. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Dynamic and Adaptive Compilation and Optimization (Dynamo '00), pp. 1-11, Jan. 2000.]]

Digital Library

[35]

Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. SPECjvm98 Benchmarks, available at http://www.spec.org/osg/jvrn98 and SPECjbb-2000 available at http://www.spec.org/osg/jbb2000.]]

[36]

T. Suganuma, T. Ogasawara, M. Takeuchi, T. Yasue, M. Kawahito, K. Ishizaki, H. Komatsd, and T. Nakatani. Overview of the IBM Java Just-in-Time Compiler, IBM Systems Journal, 39(1), 2000.]]

Digital Library

[37]

Sun Microsysterus. The Java Hotspot Performance Engine Architecture. White paper available at http://java.sun.com/products/hotspot/index.html, May. 2001.]]

[38]

Sun Microsystems. Hot Java TM Browser available at http://java.sun.eorn/products/hotj ava/index.html 1997.]]

[39]

O. Traub, S. Schechter, and M.D. Smith. Ephemeral Instrumentation for Lightweight Program Profiling. Technical Report, Harvard University, 1999.]]

[40]

J. Whaley. A Portable Sampling-Based Profiler for Java Virtual Machines. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Java Grande Conference, Jun. 2000.]]

Digital Library

[41]

J. Whaley. Dynamic Optimization through the Use of Automatie Runtime Specialization. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 1999.]]

[42]

Wind River Systems Inc. "IceStorm Browser 5", available at http://www.iceso ft.no/ieebrowser5/index.htm12000.]]

[43]

B.S. Yang, S.M. Moon, S. Park, J. Lee, S. Lee, J. Park, Y.C. Chung, S. Kim, K. Ebeioglu, and E. Altman. LaTTe: A Java VM Just-in-Time Compiler with Fast and Efficient Register Allocation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation Technique, Oct. 1999.]]

Digital Library

Cited By

Kohli SKharbanda SBruno RCarreira JFonseca P(2024)Pronghorn: Effective Checkpoint Orchestration for Serverless Hot-StartsProceedings of the Nineteenth European Conference on Computer Systems10.1145/3627703.3629556(298-316)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3627703.3629556
Jangda APowers BBerger EGuha ADan TDahlia M(2019)Not so fastProceedings of the 2019 USENIX Conference on Usenix Annual Technical Conference10.5555/3358807.3358817(107-120)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3358807.3358817
Brock JDing CXu XZhang YDubach CXue J(2018)PAYJIT: space-optimal JIT compilation and its practical implementationProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Compiler Construction10.1145/3178372.3179523(71-81)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3178372.3179523
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A dynamic optimization framework for a Java just-in-time compiler
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software notations and tools
    1. Compilers
    2. General programming languages
      1. Language types
        Functional languages

Recommendations

Fast, effective code generation in a just-in-time Java compiler
PLDI '98: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1998 conference on Programming language design and implementation

A "Just-In-Time" (JIT) Java compiler produces native code from Java byte code instructions during program execution. As such, compilation speed is more important in a Java JIT compiler than in a traditional compiler, requiring optimization algorithms to ...
A dynamic optimization framework for a Java just-in-time compiler

The high performance implementation of Java Virtual Machines (JVM) and just-in-time (JIT) compilers is directed toward adaptive compilation optimizations on the basis of online runtime profile information. This paper describes the design and ...
Design and evaluation of dynamic optimizations for a Java just-in-time compiler

The high performance implementation of Java Virtual Machines (JVM) and Just-In-Time (JIT) compilers is directed toward employing a dynamic compilation system on the basis of online runtime profile information. The trade-off between the compilation ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

OOPSLA '01: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications

October 2001

382 pages

ISBN:1581133359

DOI:10.1145/504282

Conference Chair:
Linda Northrop
Software Engineering Institute
,
Program Chair:
John Vlissides
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

ACM SIGPLAN Notices Volume 36, Issue 11
11/01/2001
380 pages
ISSN:0362-1340
EISSN:1558-1160
DOI:10.1145/504311
Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2001 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

OOPSLA01

Sponsor:

SIGPLAN

OOPSLA01: ACM SIGPLAN Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications Conference

October 14 - 18, 2001

FL, Tampa Bay, USA

Acceptance Rates

OOPSLA '01 Paper Acceptance Rate 27 of 145 submissions, 19%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,244 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

124
Total Citations
View Citations
2,256
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)45
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 29 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Kohli SKharbanda SBruno RCarreira JFonseca P(2024)Pronghorn: Effective Checkpoint Orchestration for Serverless Hot-StartsProceedings of the Nineteenth European Conference on Computer Systems10.1145/3627703.3629556(298-316)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3627703.3629556
Jangda APowers BBerger EGuha ADan TDahlia M(2019)Not so fastProceedings of the 2019 USENIX Conference on Usenix Annual Technical Conference10.5555/3358807.3358817(107-120)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3358807.3358817
Brock JDing CXu XZhang YDubach CXue J(2018)PAYJIT: space-optimal JIT compilation and its practical implementationProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Compiler Construction10.1145/3178372.3179523(71-81)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3178372.3179523
do Rosario VPisani FGomes ABorin E(2018)Fog-Assisted Translation: Towards Efficient Software Emulation on Heterogeneous IoT Devices2018 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)10.1109/IPDPSW.2018.00196(1268-1277)Online publication date: May-2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW.2018.00196
Ueda YOhara M(2017)Performance competitiveness of a statically compiled language for server-side Web applications2017 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)10.1109/ISPASS.2017.7975266(13-22)Online publication date: Apr-2017
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPASS.2017.7975266
Lion DChiu ASun HZhuang XGrcevski NYuan DKeeton KRoscoe T(2016)Don't get caught in the cold, warm-up your JVMProceedings of the 12th USENIX conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation10.5555/3026877.3026907(383-400)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3026877.3026907
Fu JJin GZhang LWang JPalermo GFeo JTumeo AFranke H(2016)CAOSProceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers10.1145/2903150.2903151(110-118)Online publication date: 16-May-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2903150.2903151
Lee B(2015)Adaptive Correction of Sampling Bias in Dynamic Call GraphsACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization10.1145/284080612:4(1-24)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2840806
Hara-Azumi YKunimoto MNakashima Y(2014)Emulator-oriented tiny processors for unreliable post-silicon devices: A case study2014 19th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)10.1109/ASPDAC.2014.6742871(85-90)Online publication date: Jan-2014
https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.2014.6742871
Kawahito MKomatsu HMoriyama TInoue HNakatani T(2013)Idiom recognition framework using topological embeddingACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization10.1145/251243110:3(1-34)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2512431
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents