Work-in-Progress: Older Adults' Experiences With an Augmented Reality Communication System
Authors: 
Veronika Mikhailova, Christian Kunert, Jakob Hartbrich, Tobias Schwandt, Christoph Gerhardt, Alexander Raake, Wolfgang Broll, Nicola DöringAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 382 - 387
Abstract
Given the profound impact of staying socially connected on the well-being of older adults, this study explores the potential of augmented reality (AR) systems to enrich their social lives. A wearable AR communication system prototype was developed and tested in a user study involving N = 16 older adults from Germany. Participants wore an AR headset and engaged in a conversation task with a remote person represented by an avatar. Older adults’ experiences were assessed using think-aloud protocols, qualitative observations, posttest questionnaires, and semi-structured oral interviews. Preliminary findings indicate overall participant satisfaction, with minimal observed difficulties in headset usage and avatar-mediated interpersonal communication. The positive engagement during AR conversations highlights the system’s potential to provide positive communication experiences among older individuals. This work-in-progress paper introduces the developed system prototype and outlines the conducted user study. Further data analyses will provide deeper insights into older adults’ experiences with the system. The results will contribute to refining the prototype and offer valuable insights for the development of AR communication systems tailored to the needs and preferences of older adults.
References
[1]
Barbara Barbosa Neves, Rachel Franz, Rebecca Judges, Christian Beermann, and Ron Baecker. 2017. Can Digital Technology Enhance Social Connectedness Among Older Adults? A Feasibility Study. Journal of Applied Gerontology 38, 1 (Nov. 2017), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817741369
[2]
Frank Biocca, Chad Harms, and Judee K. Burgoon. 2003. Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12, 5 (Oct. 2003), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
[3]
Michael T. Bixter, Kenneth A. Blocker, and Wendy A. Rogers. 2018. Enhancing social engagement of older adults through technology. In Aging, Technology and Health. Elsevier, San Diego, 179–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-811272-4.00008-7
[4]
Sven Blomqvist, Stefan Seipel, and Maria Engström. 2021. Using Augmented Reality Technology for Balance Training in the Older Adults: A Feasibility Pilot Study. BMC Geriatrics 21, 1 (Feb. 2021), 144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02061-9
[5]
Ying-Yu Chao, Yvonne K. Scherer, and Carolyn A. Montgomery. 2014. Effects of Using Nintendo Wii™ Exergames in Older Adults: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Aging and Health 27, 3 (Sept. 2014), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314551171
[6]
Arindam Dey, Mark Billinghurst, Robert W. Lindeman, and J. Edward Swan II. 2018. A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014. Frontiers Robotics AI 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
[7]
Chenyao Diao, Luljeta Sinani, Rakesh Rao Ramachandra Rao, and Alexander Raake. 2023. Revisiting Videoconferencing QoE: Impact of Network Delay and Resolution as Factors for Social Cue Perceptibility. In 2023 15th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, Ghent, Belgium, 240–243. https://doi.org/10.1109/qomex58391.2023.10178483
[8]
Nicola Döring, Veronika Mikhailova, Karlheinz Brandenburg, Wolfgang Broll, Horst-Michael Gross, Stephan Werner, and Alexander Raake. 2022. Digital Media in Intergenerational Communication: Status Quo and Future Scenarios for the Grandparent–Grandchild Relationship. Universal Access in the Information Society 23 (December 2022), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00957-w
[9]
Li Na Lee, Mi Jeong Kim, and Won Ju Hwang. 2019. Potential of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Technologies to Promote Wellbeing in Older Adults. Applied Sciences 9, 17 (Aug. 2019), 3556. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173556
[10]
Matthew Lombard and Theresa Ditton. 1997. At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3, 2 (June 1997), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
[11]
Jennifer A. Margrett, Kaitlyn M. Ouverson, Stephen B. Gilbert, L. Alison Phillips, and Neil Charness. 2022. Older Adults’ Use of Extended Reality: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (Jan. 2022), 760064. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.760064
[12]
João Mariano, Sibila Marques, Miguel R. Ramos, Filomena Gerardo, Cátia Lage da Cunha, Andrey Girenko, Jan Alexandersson, Bernard Stree, Michele Lamanna, Maurizio Lorenzatto, Louise Pierrel Mikkelsen, Uffe Bundgård-Jørgensen, Sílvia Rêgo, and Hein de Vries. 2021. Too Old for Technology? Stereotype Threat and Technology Use by Older Adults. Behaviour & Information Technology 41, 7 (Feb. 2021), 1503–1514. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2021.1882577
[13]
Veronika Mikhailova, Melisa Conde, and Nicola Döring. 2024. “Like a Virtual Family Reunion”: Older Adults Defining Requirements for an Augmented Reality Communication System. Information 15, 1 (Jan. 2024), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010052
[14]
Mark Roman Miller, Hanseul Jun, Fernanda Herrera, Jacob Yu Villa, Greg Welch, and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2019. Social Interaction in Augmented Reality. PLOS ONE 14, 5 (May 2019), e0216290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216290
[15]
Franz J. Neyer, Juliane Felber, and Claudia Gebhardt. 2016. Zusammenstellung Sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS; Collection of Social Science Items and Scales). https://doi.org/10.6102/zis244
[16]
Kristine L. Nowak and Frank Biocca. 2003. The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users’ Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12, 5 (Oct. 2003), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761289
[17]
Sergio Orts-Escolano, Christoph Rhemann, Sean Fanello, Wayne Chang, Adarsh Kowdle, Yury Degtyarev, David Kim, Philip L. Davidson, Sameh Khamis, Mingsong Dou, Vladimir Tankovich, Charles Loop, Qin Cai, Philip A. Chou, Sarah Mennicken, Julien Valentin, Vivek Pradeep, Shenlong Wang, Sing Bing Kang, Pushmeet Kohli, Yuliya Lutchyn, Cem Keskin, and Shahram Izadi. 2016. Holoportation: Virtual 3D Teleportation in Real-time. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, Tokyo, Japan, 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984517
[18]
Kees Overbeeke, Tom Djajadiningrat, Caroline Hummels, Stephan Wensveen, and Joep Prens. 2003. Let’s Make Things Engaging. In Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_2
[19]
Patricio Ramírez-Correa, Elizabeth E. Grandón, Muriel Ramírez-Santana, and Leonard Belmar Órdenes. 2019. Explaining the Use of Social Network Sites as Seen by Older Adults: The Enjoyment Component of a Hedonic Information System. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, 10 (May 2019), 1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101673
[20]
Nina Rohrbach, Philipp Gulde, Alan Robert Armstrong, Linda Hartig, Anas Abdelrazeq, Stefan Schröder, Johanne Neuse, Timo Grimmer, Janine Diehl-Schmid, and Joachim Hermsdörfer. 2019. An Augmented Reality Approach for ADL Support in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Crossover Trial. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 16, 1 (June 2019), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0530-z
[21]
Katrin Schoenenberg, Alexander Raake, and P. Lebreton. 2014. Conversational Quality and Visual Interaction of Video-Telephony Under Synchronous and Asynchronous Transmission Delay. In 2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, Singapore, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2014.6982282
[22]
John Short, Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley, London, UK.
[23]
Manfred Thüring and Sascha Mahlke. 2007. Usability, Aesthetics and Amotions in Human–Technology Interaction. International Journal of Psychology 42, 4 (Aug. 2007), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701396674
[24]
Mark Tyler, Linda De George-Walker, and Veronika Simic. 2020. Motivation matters: Older adults and information communication technologies. Studies in the Education of Adults 52, 2 (March 2020), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2020.1731058
[25]
Bei Wu. 2020. Social Isolation and Loneliness Among Older Adults in the Context of COVID-19: A Global Challenge. Global Health Research and Policy 5 (June 2020), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-020-00154-3
[26]
Mark Yi-Cheon Yim, Shu-Chuan Chu, and Paul L. Sauer. 2017. Is Augmented Reality Technology an Effective Tool for E-commerce? An Interactivity and Vividness Perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing 39 (Aug. 2017), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001
Index Terms
- Work-in-Progress: Older Adults' Experiences With an Augmented Reality Communication System
Recommendations
Interrogating Social Virtual Reality as a Communication Medium for Older Adults
A growing body of research is examining the way that virtual reality (VR) technology might enrich the lives of older adults. However, no studies have yet examined how this technology---combining head mounted displays, motion tracking, avatars, and ...
Understanding Older Adults' Participation in Online Social Activities: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic
CSCWRestrictions arising from the COVID-19 pandemic have limited opportunities for older people to participate in face-to-face organised social activities. Many organisations moved these activities online, but little is known about older adults' experiences ...
Augmented Reality and Older Adults: A Comparison of Prompting Types
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsOlder adults can benefit from technologies that help them to complete everyday tasks. However, they are an often-under-represented population in augmented reality (AR) research. We present the results of a study in which people aged 50 years or older ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
465 pages
ISBN:9798400705038
DOI:10.1145/3639701
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 07 June 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Work in progress
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
IMX '24: ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences
June 12 - 14, 2024
Stockholm, Sweden
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 245 submissions, 28%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 72Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)72
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format