Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3637528.3671519acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Unified Dual-Intent Translation for Joint Modeling of Search and Recommendation

Published: 24 August 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Recommendation systems, which assist users in discovering their preferred items among numerous options, have served billions of users across various online platforms. Intuitively, users' interactions with items are highly driven by their unchanging inherent intents (e.g., always preferring high-quality items) and changing demand intents (e.g., wanting a T-shirt in summer but a down jacket in winter). However, both types of intents are implicitly expressed in recommendation scenario, posing challenges in leveraging them for accurate intent-aware recommendations. Fortunately, in search scenario, often found alongside recommendation on the same online platform, users express their demand intents explicitly through their query words. Intuitively, in both scenarios, a user shares the same inherent intent and his/her interactions may be influenced by the same demand intent. It is therefore feasible to utilize the interaction data from both scenarios to reinforce the dual intents for joint intent-aware modeling. But the joint modeling should deal with two problems: (1) accurately modeling users' implicit demand intents in recommendation; (2) modeling the relation between the dual intents and the interactive items. To address these problems, we propose a novel model named Unified Dual-Intents Translation for joint modeling of Search and Recommendation (UDITSR). To accurately simulate users' demand intents in recommendation, we utilize real queries from search data as supervision information to guide its generation. To explicitly model the relation among the triplet <inherent intent, demand intent, interactive item>, we propose a dual-intent translation propagation mechanism to learn the triplet in the same semantic space via embedding translations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UDITSR outperforms SOTA baselines both in search and recommendation tasks. Moreover, our model has been deployed online on Meituan Waimai platform, leading to an average improvement in GMV (Gross Merchandise Value) of 1.46% and CTR(Click-Through Rate) of 0.77% over one month.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File - Unified Dual-Intent Translation for Joint Modeling of Search and Recommendation
Video presentation about Unified Dual-Intent Translation for Joint Modeling of Search and Recommendation

References

[1]
Qingyao Ai, Daniel N Hill, SVN Vishwanathan, and W Bruce Croft. 2019. A zero attention model for personalized product search. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 379--388.
[2]
Nicholas J Belkin and W Bruce Croft. 1992. Information filtering and information retrieval: Two sides of the same coin? Commun. ACM, Vol. 35, 12 (1992), 29--38.
[3]
Keping Bi, Qingyao Ai, and W Bruce Croft. 2020. A transformer-based embedding model for personalized product search. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1521--1524.
[4]
Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 26 (2013).
[5]
Tong Chen, Hongzhi Yin, Hongxu Chen, Rui Yan, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, and Xue Li. 2019. Air: Attentional intention-aware recommender systems. In 2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 304--315.
[6]
Heng-Tze Cheng, Levent Koc, Jeremiah Harmsen, Tal Shaked, Tushar Chandra, Hrishi Aradhye, Glen Anderson, Greg Corrado, Wei Chai, Mustafa Ispir, et al. 2016. Wide & deep learning for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 1st workshop on deep learning for recommender systems. 7--10.
[7]
Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems. 191--198.
[8]
Tyler Derr, Yao Ma, and Jiliang Tang. 2018. Signed graph convolutional networks. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 929--934.
[9]
Jeff Donahue, Yangqing Jia, Oriol Vinyals, Judy Hoffman, Ning Zhang, Eric Tzeng, and Trevor Darrell. 2014. Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 647--655.
[10]
Lu Fan, Qimai Li, Bo Liu, Xiao-Ming Wu, Xiaotong Zhang, Fuyu Lv, Guli Lin, Sen Li, Taiwei Jin, and Keping Yang. 2022. Modeling user behavior with graph convolution for personalized product search. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. 203--212.
[11]
Yufei Feng, Fuyu Lv, Weichen Shen, Menghan Wang, Fei Sun, Yu Zhu, and Keping Yang. 2019. Deep session interest network for click-through rate prediction. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2301--2307.
[12]
Cesar Ferri, José Hernández-Orallo, and Peter A Flach. 2011. A coherent interpretation of AUC as a measure of aggregated classification performance. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11). 657--664.
[13]
Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, Yunming Ye, Zhenguo Li, and Xiuqiang He. 2017. DeepFM: a factorization-machine based neural network for CTR prediction. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1725--1731.
[14]
Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval. 639--648.
[15]
Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 173--182.
[16]
Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In 2008 Eighth IEEE international conference on data mining. Ieee, 263--272.
[17]
Kalervo Järvelin and Jaana Kekäläinen. 2002. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 20, 4 (2002), 422--446.
[18]
Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
[19]
Lihong Li, Wei Chu, John Langford, and Robert E Schapire. 2010. A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. 661--670.
[20]
Sen Li, Fuyu Lv, Taiwei Jin, Guli Lin, Keping Yang, Xiaoyi Zeng, Xiao-Ming Wu, and Qianli Ma. 2021. Embedding-based product retrieval in taobao search. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 3181--3189.
[21]
Jianxun Lian, Xiaohuan Zhou, Fuzheng Zhang, Zhongxia Chen, Xing Xie, and Guangzhong Sun. 2018. xdeepfm: Combining explicit and implicit feature interactions for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 1754--1763.
[22]
Shang Liu, Wanli Gu, Gao Cong, and Fuzheng Zhang. 2020. Structural relationship representation learning with graph embedding for personalized product search. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 915--924.
[23]
Zhiwei Liu, Xiaohan Li, Ziwei Fan, Stephen Guo, Kannan Achan, and S Yu Philip. 2020. Basket recommendation with multi-intent translation graph neural network. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 728--737.
[24]
Kelong Mao, Jieming Zhu, Jinpeng Wang, Quanyu Dai, Zhenhua Dong, Xi Xiao, and Xiuqiang He. 2021. SimpleX: A simple and strong baseline for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 1243--1252.
[25]
Xichuan Niu, Bofang Li, Chenliang Li, Rong Xiao, Haochuan Sun, Hongbo Deng, and Zhenzhong Chen. 2020. A dual heterogeneous graph attention network to improve long-tail performance for shop search in e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 3405--3415.
[26]
Qi Pi, Guorui Zhou, Yujing Zhang, Zhe Wang, Lejian Ren, Ying Fan, Xiaoqiang Zhu, and Kun Gai. 2020. Search-based user interest modeling with lifelong sequential behavior data for click-through rate prediction. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2685--2692.
[27]
Chuan Qin, Le Zhang, Rui Zha, Dazhong Shen, Qi Zhang, Ying Sun, Chen Zhu, Hengshu Zhu, and Hui Xiong. 2023. A comprehensive survey of artificial intelligence techniques for talent analytics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03195 (2023).
[28]
Dragomir R Radev, Hong Qi, Harris Wu, and Weiguo Fan. 2002. Evaluating Web-based Question Answering Systems. In LREC. Citeseer.
[29]
Xubin Ren, Lianghao Xia, Jiashu Zhao, Dawei Yin, and Chao Huang. 2023. Disentangled Contrastive Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, (Taipei, Taiwan,) (SIGIR '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1137--1146. https://doi.org/10.1145/3539618.3591665
[30]
Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 452--461.
[31]
Badrul Sarwar, George Karypis, Joseph Konstan, and John Riedl. 2001. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web. 285--295.
[32]
Franco Scarselli, Marco Gori, Ah Chung Tsoi, Markus Hagenbuchner, and Gabriele Monfardini. 2008. The graph neural network model. IEEE transactions on neural networks, Vol. 20, 1 (2008), 61--80.
[33]
Parikshit Sondhi, Mohit Sharma, Pranam Kolari, and ChengXiang Zhai. 2018. A taxonomy of queries for e-commerce search. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. 1245--1248.
[34]
Fei Sun, Jun Liu, Jian Wu, Changhua Pei, Xiao Lin, Wenwu Ou, and Peng Jiang. 2019. BERT4Rec: Sequential recommendation with bidirectional encoder representations from transformer. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management. 1441--1450.
[35]
Chang-You Tai, Liang-Ying Huang, Chien-Kun Huang, and Lun-Wei Ku. 2021. User-centric path reasoning towards explainable recommendation. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 879--889.
[36]
Petar Velivcković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Liò, and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. Graph Attention Networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
[37]
Shoujin Wang, Liang Hu, Yan Wang, Quan Z Sheng, Mehmet Orgun, and Longbing Cao. 2019. Modeling multi-purpose sessions for next-item recommendations via mixture-channel purpose routing networks. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.
[38]
Shoujin Wang, Liang Hu, Yan Wang, Quan Z Sheng, Mehmet Orgun, and Longbing Cao. 2020. Intention2basket: A neural intention-driven approach for dynamic next-basket planning. In Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Seventeenth Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-PRICAI-20}. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization.
[39]
Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Meng Wang, Fuli Feng, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Neural graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 42nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval. 165--174.
[40]
Shiwen Wu, Fei Sun, Wentao Zhang, Xu Xie, and Bin Cui. 2022. Graph neural networks in recommender systems: a survey. Comput. Surveys, Vol. 55, 5 (2022), 1--37.
[41]
Zonghan Wu, Shirui Pan, Fengwen Chen, Guodong Long, Chengqi Zhang, and S Yu Philip. 2020. A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, Vol. 32, 1 (2020), 4--24.
[42]
Sijie Yan, Yuanjun Xiong, and Dahua Lin. 2018. Spatial temporal graph convolutional networks for skeleton-based action recognition. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 32.
[43]
Jing Yao, Zhicheng Dou, Ruobing Xie, Yanxiong Lu, Zhiping Wang, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2021. USER: A unified information search and recommendation model based on integrated behavior sequence. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2373--2382.
[44]
Hamed Zamani and W Bruce Croft. 2018. Joint modeling and optimization of search and recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.05631 (2018).
[45]
Hamed Zamani and W Bruce Croft. 2020. Learning a joint search and recommendation model from user-item interactions. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on web search and data mining. 717--725.
[46]
Chuxu Zhang, Dongjin Song, Chao Huang, Ananthram Swami, and Nitesh V Chawla. 2019. Heterogeneous graph neural network. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 793--803.
[47]
Kai Zhao, Yukun Zheng, Tao Zhuang, Xiang Li, and Xiaoyi Zeng. 2022. Joint learning of e-commerce search and recommendation with a unified graph neural network. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 1461--1469.
[48]
Guorui Zhou, Na Mou, Ying Fan, Qi Pi, Weijie Bian, Chang Zhou, Xiaoqiang Zhu, and Kun Gai. 2019. Deep interest evolution network for click-through rate prediction. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 33. 5941--5948.
[49]
Guorui Zhou, Xiaoqiang Zhu, Chenru Song, Ying Fan, Han Zhu, Xiao Ma, Yanghui Yan, Junqi Jin, Han Li, and Kun Gai. 2018. Deep interest network for click-through rate prediction. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 1059--1068.
[50]
Nengjun Zhu, Jian Cao, Yanchi Liu, Yang Yang, Haochao Ying, and Hui Xiong. 2020. Sequential modeling of hierarchical user intention and preference for next-item recommendation. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on web search and data mining. 807--815.

Index Terms

  1. Unified Dual-Intent Translation for Joint Modeling of Search and Recommendation
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '24: Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
    August 2024
    6901 pages
    ISBN:9798400704901
    DOI:10.1145/3637528
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 August 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. dual intent modeling
    2. intent translation
    3. joint learning
    4. search and recommendation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    KDD '24
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 337
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)337
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)169
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media