Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Privacy Norms of Transformative Fandom: A Case Study of an Activity-Defined Community

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Transformative media fandom is a remarkably coherent, long-lived, and diverse community united primarily by shared engagement in the varied activities of fandom. Its social norms are highly-developed and frequently debated, and have been studied by the CSCW and Media Studies communities in the past, but rarely using the tools and theories of privacy, despite fannish norms often bearing strongly on privacy. We use privacy scholarship and existing theories thereof to examine these norms and bring an additional perspective to understanding fandom communities. In this work, we analyze over 250,000 words of "meta'' essays and comments on those essays, reflecting the views and debates of hundreds of fans on these privacy norms. Drawing on Solove's theory of privacy as an aggregation of different ideas and on a variety of other academic theories of privacy, we analyze these norms as highly effective at protecting the integrity of fannish activities. We then articulate the value of studying these sorts of diverse "activity-defined'' communities, arguing that such approaches grant us greater power to understand privacy experiences in ways that are specific, contextual, and intersectional yet still generalizable where possible.

References

[1]
Tousif Ahmed, Roberto Hoyle, Kay Connelly, David Crandall, and Apu Kapadia. 2015. Privacy concerns and behaviors of people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3523--3532.
[2]
astolat. 2007. An Archive Of One's Own. https://web.archive.org/web/20230126003023/https://astolat.livejournal.com/150556.html. Accessed July 7, 2023.
[3]
Camille Bacon-Smith. 1992. Enterprising women: Television fandom and the creation of popular myth. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[4]
Rosaline S Barbour. 2001. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? Bmj, Vol. 322, 7294 (2001), 1115--1117.
[5]
Catherine Barwulor, Allison McDonald, Eszter Hargittai, and Elissa M Redmiles. 2021. ?Disadvantaged in the American-dominated internet": Sex, Work, and Technology. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16.
[6]
danah boyd. 2010. Privacy and Publicity in the Context of Big Data. WWW. Raleigh, North Carolina, April 29.
[7]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology, Vol. 18, 3 (2021), 328--352.
[8]
Kristina Busse and Karen Hellekson. 2012. Identity, Ethics, and Fan Privacy. Fan Culture: Theory/Practice, Vol. 38 (2012).
[9]
US Supreme Court. 2015. Obergefell v. Hodges.
[10]
KW Crenshaw. 1989. Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Gender: a Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. In University of Chicago legal forum, Vol. 1. 138--167.
[11]
Michael Ann DeVito. 2022. How transfeminine TikTok creators navigate the algorithmic trap of visibility via folk theorization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1--31.
[12]
Michael A DeVito, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Jeffery T Hancock. 2017. Platforms, people, and perception: Using affordances to understand self-presentation on social media. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 740--754.
[13]
Michael A DeVito, Ashley Marie Walker, and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2018. 'Too Gay for Facebook' Presenting LGBTQ Identity Throughout the Personal Social Media Ecosystem. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--23.
[14]
Jeff D'Onofrio. 2018. A Better, More Positive Tumblr. https://staff.tumblr.com/post/180758987165/a-better-more-positive-tumblr. Accessed January 12, 2023.
[15]
Dreamwidth. n.d. Diversity Statement. https://www.dreamwidth.org/legal/diversity. Accessed July 7, 2023.
[16]
Brianna Dym and Casey Fiesler. 2018a. Generations, migrations, and the future of fandom's private spaces. Transformative works and cultures, Vol. 28 (2018).
[17]
Brianna Dym and Casey Fiesler. 2018b. Vulnerable and online: Fandom's case for stronger privacy norms and tools. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 329--332.
[18]
Brianna Dym and Casey Fiesler. 2020. Ethical and Privacy Considerations for Research Using Online Fandom Data. Transformative Works and Cultures, Vol. 33 (2020).
[19]
Brianna Dym, Namita Pasupuleti, and Casey Fiesler. 2022. Building a Pillowfort: Political Tensions in Platform Design and Policy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, GROUP (2022), 1--23.
[20]
Fanlore. n.d. a. Cease & Desist. https://fanlore.org/wiki/Cease_&_Desist. Accessed July 7, 2023.
[21]
Fanlore. n.d. b. FanFiction.Net's NC-17 Purges: 2002 and 2012. https://fanlore.org/wiki/FanFiction.Net's_NC-17_Purges:_2002_and_2012. Accessed July 7, 2023.
[22]
Fanlore. n.d c. Linking to Public Fan Sites. https://fanlore.org/wiki/Linking_to_Public_Fan_Sites. Accessed January 12, 2023.
[23]
Fanlore. n.d d. Strikethrough and Boldthrough. https://fanlore.org/wiki/Strikethrough_and_Boldthrough. Accessed January 12, 2023.
[24]
Casey Fiesler and Amy S Bruckman. 2019. Creativity, Copyright, and Close-Knit Communities: A Case Study of Social Norm Formation and Enforcement. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, GROUP (2019), 1--24.
[25]
Casey Fiesler and Brianna Dym. 2020. Moving across lands: Online platform migration in fandom communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1--25.
[26]
Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S Bruckman. 2016. An archive of their own: A case study of feminist HCI and values in design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2574--2585.
[27]
Casey Fiesler and Nicholas Proferes. 2018. ?Participant" perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media Society, Vol. 4, 1 (2018), 2056305118763366.
[28]
Organization for Transformative Works. n.d. Legal Advocacy | Organization for Transformative Works. https://www.transformativeworks.org/legal/. Accessed January 15, 2023.
[29]
Diana Freed, Jackeline Palmer, Diana Minchala, Karen Levy, Thomas Ristenpart, and Nicola Dell. 2018. ?A Stalker's Paradise" How Intimate Partner Abusers Exploit Technology. 1--13.
[30]
Diana Freed, Jackeline Palmer, Diana Elizabeth Minchala, Karen Levy, Thomas Ristenpart, and Nicola Dell. 2017. Digital technologies and intimate partner violence: A qualitative analysis with multiple stakeholders. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--22.
[31]
Erving Goffman. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. (1959).
[32]
Oliver L Haimson, Justin Buss, Zu Weinger, Denny L Starks, Dykee Gorrell, and Briar Sweetbriar Baron. 2020. Trans Time: Safety, Privacy, and Content Warnings on a Transgender-Specific Social Media Site. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--27.
[33]
Foad Hamidi, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, and Stacy M Branham. 2018. Gender recognition or gender reductionism? The social implications of embedded gender recognition systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.
[34]
Jordan Hayes, Smirity Kaushik, Charlotte Emily Price, and Yang Wang. 2019. Cooperative privacy and security: Learning from people with visual impairments and their allies. In Fifteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2019). 1--20.
[35]
Karen Hellekson. 2009. A fannish field of value: Online fan gift culture. Cinema journal, Vol. 48, 4 (2009), 113--118.
[36]
Sandy James, Jody Herman, Susan Rankin, Mara Keisling, Lisa Mottet, and Ma'ayan Anafi. 2016. The report of the 2015 US transgender survey. (2016).
[37]
Henry Jenkins. 1992. Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. Routledge.
[38]
Bethan Jones. 2016. ?I hate Beyoncé and I don't care who knows it': Towards an ethics of studying anti-fandom. The Journal of Fandom Studies, Vol. 4, 3 (2016), 283--299.
[39]
Brittany Kelley. 2016. Toward a goodwill ethics of online research methods. Transformative works and cultures, Vol. 22, 0 (2016).
[40]
Os Keyes. 2018. The misgendering machines: Trans/HCI implications of automatic gender recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--22.
[41]
Ada Lerner, Helen Yuxun He, Anna Kawakami, Silvia Catherine Zeamer, and Roberto Hoyle. 2020. Privacy and activism in the transgender community. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[42]
Alexis Lothian, Kristina Busse, and Robin Anne Reid. 2007. ?Yearning Void and Infinite Potential": Online Slash Fandom as Queer Female Space. English Language Notes, Vol. 45, 2 (2007), 103.
[43]
Lulu. 2013. AO3 Census: Masterpost. https://centrumlumina.tumblr.com/post/63208278796/ao3-census-masterpost. Accessed January 9, 2023.
[44]
Annette Markham. 2012. Fabrication as ethical practice: Qualitative inquiry in ambiguous internet contexts. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 15, 3 (2012), 334--353.
[45]
Annette Markham and Elizabeth Buchanan. 2012. Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Association of Internet Researchers (2012).
[46]
Tara Matthews, Kathleen O'Leary, Anna Turner, Manya Sleeper, Jill Palzkill Woelfer, Martin Shelton, Cori Manthorne, Elizabeth F Churchill, and Sunny Consolvo. 2017. Stories from survivors: Privacy & security practices when coping with intimate partner abuse. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2189--2201.
[47]
Allison McDonald, Catherine Barwulor, Michelle L Mazurek, Florian Schaub, and Elissa M Redmiles. 2021. "It's stressful having all these phones": Investigating Sex Workers' Safety Goals, Risks, and Practices Online. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 21). 375--392.
[48]
Nora McDonald, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Andrea Forte. 2019. Reliability and inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: Norms and guidelines for CSCW and HCI practice. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--23.
[49]
Susan E McGregor, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Mahdi Nasrullah Al-Ameen, Kelly Caine, and Franziska Roesner. 2017. When the weakest link is strong: Secure collaboration in the case of the Panama Papers. In 26th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 17). 505--522.
[50]
metafandom. n.d. metafandom: interesting discussions in fandom. https://web.archive.org/web/20140828092758/http://metafandom.livejournal.com/profile. Archived on the WayBack Machine, August 28, 2014. Accessed January 12, 2023.
[51]
Reham Ebada Mohamed and Sonia Chiasson. 2018. Online privacy and aging of digital artifacts. In Fourteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2018). 177--195.
[52]
Jessica D Moorman and Kristen Harrison. 2016. Gender, race, and risk: Intersectional risk management in the sale of sex online. The Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 53, 7 (2016), 816--824.
[53]
Lucy Neville. 2018a. Girls Who like boys who like boys: Women and gay male pornography and erotica. Springer.
[54]
Lucy Neville. 2018b. ?The Tent's Big Enough for Everyone': online slash fiction as a site for activism and change. Gender, Place & Culture, Vol. 25, 3 (2018), 384--398.
[55]
Helen Nissenbaum. 2004. Privacy as contextual integrity. Wash. L. Rev., Vol. 79 (2004), 119.
[56]
Fayika Farhat Nova, Michael Ann DeVito, Pratyasha Saha, Kazi Shohanur Rashid, Shashwata Roy Turzo, Sadia Afrin, and Shion Guha. 2021. " Facebook Promotes More Harassment" Social Media Ecosystem, Skill and Marginalized Hijra Identity in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--35.
[57]
Erika Pearson. 2007. Digital gifts: Participation and gift exchange in LiveJournal communities. First Monday (2007).
[58]
Anthony T Pinter, Jialun Aaron Jiang, Katie Z Gach, Melanie M Sidwell, James E Dykes, and Jed R Brubaker. 2019. " Am I Never Going to Be Free of All This Crap?" Upsetting Encounters with Algorithmically Curated Content About Ex-Partners. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--23.
[59]
Elizabeth Rosenblatt and Rebecca Tushnet. 2015. Transformative works: Young women's voices on fandom and fair use. Egirls, eCitizens, Vol. 385 (2015).
[60]
Lauren Rouse and Mel Stanfill. 2023. Over*Flow: Fan Demographics on Archive of Our Own. https://www.flowjournal.org/2023/02/fan-demographics-on-ao3/. Accessed July 7, 2023.
[61]
Rachael Sabotini. 1999. The Fannish Potlatch: Creation of status within the fan community. In The Fanfic Symposium, Vol. 20.
[62]
Cornel Sandvoss. 2005. Fans: The mirror of consumption. Polity.
[63]
Aaron Schwabach. 2016. Fan fiction and copyright: Outsider works and intellectual property protection. Routledge.
[64]
Suzanne Scott. 2009. Repackaging fan culture: The regifting economy of ancillary content models. Transformative Works and Cultures, Vol. 3, 1.6 (2009), 1--11.
[65]
Ashraf Sharif, Saira Hanif Soroya, Shakil Ahmad, and Khalid Mahmood. 2021. Antecedents of self-disclosure on social networking sites (snss): A study of facebook users. Sustainability, Vol. 13, 3 (2021), 1220.
[66]
Scott Skinner-Thompson. 2015. Outing Privacy. Nw. UL Rev., Vol. 110 (2015), 159.
[67]
Daniel J Solove. 2008. Understanding privacy. (2008).
[68]
Angelika Strohmayer, Jenn Clamen, and Mary Laing. 2019. Technologies for social justice: Lessons from sex workers on the front lines. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--14.
[69]
Synecdochic. 2008. Announcing Dreamwidth Studios. Coming Summer 2008. https://synecdochic.dreamwidth.org/221888.html. Accessed July 7, 2023.
[70]
Tumblr Changes. 2022. Ongoing incident. https://changes.tumblr.com/post/679998365786947584/ongoing-incident. Accessed January 12, 2023.
[71]
Tumblr Staff. 2022. Introducing: Reblog Controls. https://staff.tumblr.com/post/685964115655737344/introducing-reblog-controls. Accessed January 12, 2023.
[72]
Tisha Turk. 2014. Fan work: Labor, worth, and participation in fandom's gift economy. Transformative Works and Cultures, Vol. 15 (2014), 113--18.
[73]
Rebecca Tushnet. 2007. Copyright law, fan practices, and the rights of the author.
[74]
Jessica Vitak, Yuting Liao, Mega Subramaniam, and Priya Kumar. 2018. 'I Knew It Was Too Good to Be True" The Challenges Economically Disadvantaged Internet Users Face in Assessing Trustworthiness, Avoiding Scams, and Developing Self-Efficacy Online. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--25.
[75]
Ari Ezra Waldman. 2016. Privacy, sharing, and trust: The Facebook study. Case W. Res. L. Rev., Vol. 67 (2016), 193.
[76]
Ari Ezra Waldman. 2018. Privacy as trust: Information privacy for an information age. Cambridge University Press.
[77]
Ari Ezra Waldman. 2021. Industry unbound: The inside story of privacy, data, and corporate Power. Cambridge University Press.
[78]
Samuel D WARREN. 1890. The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 4, 5 ( 1890).
[79]
Natasha Whiteman. 2012. Undoing ethics. In Undoing Ethics. Springer, 135--149.
[80]
Bin Xu, Pamara Chang, Christopher L Welker, Natalya N Bazarova, and Dan Cosley. 2016. Automatic archiving versus default deletion: what Snapchat tells us about ephemerality in design. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing. 1662--1675.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Counting Carrds: Investigating Personal Disclosure and Boundary Management in Transformative FandomProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642664(1-13)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
CSCW
April 2024
6294 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3661497
Issue’s Table of Contents
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 April 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. fandom
  2. intersectionality
  3. norms
  4. privacy
  5. qualitative methods

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)295
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)46
Reflects downloads up to 14 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Counting Carrds: Investigating Personal Disclosure and Boundary Management in Transformative FandomProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642664(1-13)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media