Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3631700.3665191acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Emotional Reframing of Economic News using a Large Language Model

Published: 28 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

News media framing can shape public perception and potentially polarize views. Emotional language can exacerbate these framing effects, as a user’s emotional state can be an important contextual factor to use in news recommendation. Our research explores the relation between emotional framing techniques and the emotional states of readers, as well as readers’ perceived trust in specific news articles. Users (N = 200) had to read three economic news articles from the Washington Post. We used ChatGPT-4 to reframe news articles with specific emotional languages (Anger, Fear, Hope), compared to a neutral baseline reframed by a human journalist. Our results revealed that negative framing (Anger, Fear) elicited stronger negative emotional states among users than the neutral baseline, while Hope led to little changes overall. In contrast, perceived trust levels varied little across the different conditions. We discuss the implications of our findings and how emotional framing could affect societal polarization issues.

References

[1]
Julie L Andsager. 2000. How interest groups attempt to shape public opinion with competing news frames. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77, 3 (2000), 577–592.
[2]
Antoine Banks, Ernesto Calvo, David Karol, and Shibley Telhami. 2021. # polarizedfeeds: Three experiments on polarization, framing, and social media. The International Journal of Press/Politics 26, 3 (2021), 609–634.
[3]
C Daniel Batson, Karen Sager, Eric Garst, Misook Kang, Kostia Rubchinsky, and Karen Dawson. 1997. Is empathy-induced helping due to self–other merging?Journal of personality and social psychology 73, 3 (1997), 495.
[4]
Toby Bolsen and Matthew A Shapiro. 2018. The US news media, polarization on climate change, and pathways to effective communication. Environmental Communication 12, 2 (2018), 149–163.
[5]
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 1877–1901.
[6]
Patricia Bruininks and Devin E. Howington. 2019. Hopeful + Hoping = Hope: unique experiential features in the measurement of emotion. The Journal of Positive Psychology 14, 3 (2019), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1437465 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1437465
[7]
Robert B Cialdini, Stephanie L Brown, Brian P Lewis, Carol Luce, and Steven L Neuberg. 1997. Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness.Journal of personality and social psychology 73, 3 (1997), 481.
[8]
Scott Clifford. 2019. How emotional frames moralize and polarize political attitudes. Political psychology 40, 1 (2019), 75–91.
[9]
Theresa M De los Santos and Robin L Nabi. 2019. Emotionally charged: Exploring the role of emotion in online news information seeking and processing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 63, 1 (2019), 39–58.
[10]
CH De Vreese. 2014. Mediatization of News: The Role of Journalistic Framing. I: Strömbäck J og Esser F (red.) Mediatization of Politics. Understanding the Tranformation of Western Democracies.
[11]
Claes H De Vreese. 2005. News framing: Theory and typology. Information design journal+ document design 13, 1 (2005), 51–62.
[12]
David DeSteno, Richard E Petty, Derek D Rucker, Duane T Wegener, and Julia Braverman. 2004. Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies.Journal of personality and social psychology 86, 1 (2004), 43.
[13]
Patrick Dylong and Fabian Koenings. 2023. Framing of economic news and policy support during a pandemic: Evidence from a survey experiment. European Journal of Political Economy 76 (2023), 102249.
[14]
Richard Fletcher and Sora Park. 2017. The impact of trust in the news media on online news consumption and participation. Digital journalism 5, 10 (2017), 1281–1299.
[15]
Tameika Greenaway and Kelly S Fielding. 2020. Positive affective framing of information reduces risk perceptions and increases acceptance of recycled water. Environmental Communication 14, 3 (2020), 391–402.
[16]
Mark Hansen, Meritxell Roca-Sales, Jonathan M Keegan, and George King. 2017. Artificial intelligence: Practice and implications for journalism. (2017).
[17]
Hyo J Kim and Glen T Cameron. 2011. Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Communication Research 38, 6 (2011), 826–855.
[18]
Youngju Kim and Shuhua Zhou. 2020. The effects of political conflict news frame on political polarization: A social identity approach. International Journal of Communication 14 (2020), 22.
[19]
Castulus Kolo, Joschka Mütterlein, and Sarah Anna Schmid. 2022. Believing Journalists, AI, or Fake News: The Role of Trust in Media. In HICSS. 1–10.
[20]
Rinaldo Kühne and Christian Schemer. 2015. The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research 42, 3 (2015), 387–407.
[21]
Richard S Lazarus. 1999. Hope: An emotion and a vital coping resource against despair. Social research (1999), 653–678.
[22]
Hang Lu. 2016. The effects of emotional appeals and gain versus loss framing in communicating sea star wasting disease. Science Communication 38, 2 (2016), 143–169.
[23]
Robin L Nabi. 2003. Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference?Communication Research 30, 2 (2003), 224–247.
[24]
John V Pavlik. 2023. Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 78, 1 (2023), 84–93.
[25]
Vincent Price, David Tewksbury, and Elizabeth Powers. 1997. Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication research 24, 5 (1997), 481–506.
[26]
Joseph P Reser and Graham L Bradley. 2017. Fear appeals in climate change communication. In Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science.
[27]
Mary Sanford, Marta Witkowska, Robert Gifford, and Magda Formanowicz. 2023. Emotional framing in online environmental activism: Pairing a Twitter study with an offline experiment. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2023), 1099331.
[28]
Dietram A Scheufele. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of communication 49, 1 (1999), 103–122.
[29]
Mete Sertkan and Julia Neidhardt. 2022. Exploring expressed emotions for neural news recommendation. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. 22–28.
[30]
Mete Sertkan and Julia Neidhardt. 2023. On the Effect of Incorporating Expressed Emotions in News Articles on Diversity within Recommendation Models. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on News Recommendation and Analytics (INRA 2023) at ACM RecSys 2023.
[31]
Jonathan Stray. 2021. Designing recommender systems to depolarize. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.04953 (2021).
[32]
The Washington Post. 2024. Opinions. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/. Accessed: 2023-11-29.
[33]
D. Watson and L. A. Clark. 1994. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule–Expanded Version (PANAS-X). APA PsycTests. (1994). https://doi.org/10.1037/t04754-000

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Scientometrics Analysis and Visualization of Large Language Model in China's LibraryProceeding of the 2024 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Management Technology10.1145/3708036.3708272(1403-1407)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Bridging Viewpoints in News with Recommender SystemsProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688008(1283-1289)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP Adjunct '24: Adjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
June 2024
662 pages
ISBN:9798400704666
DOI:10.1145/3631700
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 June 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Emotional Framing
  2. News Credibility
  3. Persuasive Technologies
  4. Societal Polarization

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

UMAP '24
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)231
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)37
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Scientometrics Analysis and Visualization of Large Language Model in China's LibraryProceeding of the 2024 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Management Technology10.1145/3708036.3708272(1403-1407)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Bridging Viewpoints in News with Recommender SystemsProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688008(1283-1289)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media