Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3627341.3630390acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccvitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Two-branch weakly supervised semantic segmentation network based on web data enhancement

Published: 15 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

As we all know, CAM [1] can only provide initial seeds of objects in weakly supervised segmentation. This paper proposes a two-branch semantic segmentation network that can transfer semantic knowledge, which can help CAM achieve more complete and accurate regions of objects. Thus, the network can be specifically divided into 3 steps: (1) Firstly, training the attention map to obtain the initial mask of the target dataset; (2)Secondly, Crawling images from the web to build a web dataset, use the trained attention map model to clean the web dataset, then transfer knowledge to target dataset by training group segmentation network; (3) Finally, Fusion of the initial target dataset masks and enhanced masks are used as pseudo-supervised training full convolutional networks. The backbone network are VGG16 and ResNet-101, image-level labels were used to obtain segmentation performances of Val 65.1% and Test 65.9% on the PASCAL VOC 2012 dataset.

References

[1]
Zhou, Bolei, "Learning deep features for discriminative localization." Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2016.
[2]
Bearman A, Russakovsky O, Ferrari V, What's the Point: Semantic Segmentation with Point Supervision[C]// European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Cham, 2016.
[3]
Wang X, You S, Li X, Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation by Iteratively Mining Common Object Features[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2018.
[4]
Chen X, Gupta A. Webly supervised learning of convolutional networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2015: 1431-1439.
[5]
Krause J, Sapp B, Howard A, The unreasonable effectiveness of noisy data for fine-grained recognition[C]//European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Cham, 2016: 301-320.
[6]
Tong X, Tian X, Yi Y, Learning from massive noisy labeled data for image classification[C]// 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2015.
[7]
Chen X, Shrivastava A, Gupta A . NEIL: Extracting visual knowledge from web data[C]// 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 2014.
[8]
Jin B, Segovia M, Susstrunk S . Webly Supervised Semantic Segmentation[C]// IEEE Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, 2017:1705-1714.
[9]
Shen T, Lin G, Liu L, Weakly supervised semantic segmentation based on web image co-segmentation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.09052, 2017.
[10]
Wei Y, Liang X, Chen Y, STC: A Simple to Complex Framework for Weakly-supervised Semantic Segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(11):2314-2320.
[11]
Hong S, D Yeo, Kwak S, Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Web-Crawled Videos[C]// IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Computer Society, 2017.
[12]
Shimoda W, Yanai K. Self-supervised difference detection for weakly-supervised semantic segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 2019: 5208-5217.
[13]
Li X, Zhou T, Li J, Group-wise semantic mining for weakly supervised semantic segmentation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.05007, 2020.
[14]
Kolesnikov A, Lampert C H. Seed, expand and constrain: Three principles for weakly-supervised image segmentation[C]//European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham, 2016: 695-711.
[15]
Ahn J, Kwak S. Learning Pixel-level Semantic Affinity with Image-level Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation[C]// 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2018.
[16]
Hou Q, Jiang P T, Wei Y, Self-erasing network for integral object attention[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.09821, 2018.
[17]
Fan J, Zhang Z, Tan T, CIAN: Cross-Image Affinity Net for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 34(7):10762-10769.
[18]
Lee J, Kim E, Lee S, FickleNet: Weakly and Semi-supervised Semantic Image Segmentation\\\\using Stochastic Inference[C]// IEEE. IEEE, 2019.
[19]
Wang Y, Zhang J, Kan M, Self-supervised equivariant attention mechanism for weakly supervised semantic segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2020: 12275-12284.
[20]
Fan J, Zhang Z, Song C, Learning Integral Objects With Intra-Class Discriminator for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation[C]// 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2020.
[21]
Zhang B, Xiao J, Wei Y, Reliability Does Matter: An End-to-End Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation Approach[C]// 2020:12765-12772.
[22]
K. Chen, P. P. K. Chan, T. Xiang, N. Kees and D. S. Yeung, "Class-Specific Affinity based Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Neutral Region Exploration," 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Shenzhen, China, 2021, pp. 1-8.
[23]
M. Ergül and A. Alatan, "Depth is all you Need: Single-Stage Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation From Image-Level Supervision," 2022 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Bordeaux, France, 2022, pp. 4233-4237.
[24]
Z. Zhang, "A Componentwise Approach to Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Dual-Feedback Network," in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.
[25]
Y. Li, J. Sun and Y. Li, "Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Network With Iterative dCRF," in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 25419-25426, Dec. 2022.
[26]
Yan, X., Zheng, Z., Gao, Y. (2023). Improved Weakly Supervised Image Semantic Segmentation Method Based on SEC. In: Xiong, N., Li, M., Li, K., Xiao, Z., Liao, L., Wang, L. (eds) Advances in Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. ICNC-FSKD 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20738-9_71

Index Terms

  1. Two-branch weakly supervised semantic segmentation network based on web data enhancement
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICCVIT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Computer, Vision and Intelligent Technology
          August 2023
          378 pages
          ISBN:9798400708701
          DOI:10.1145/3627341
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 15 December 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Image Semantic Segmentation
          2. Network Dataset
          3. Weakly Supervised

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Conference

          ICCVIT 2023

          Acceptance Rates

          ICCVIT '23 Paper Acceptance Rate 54 of 142 submissions, 38%;
          Overall Acceptance Rate 54 of 142 submissions, 38%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • 0
            Total Citations
          • 16
            Total Downloads
          • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
          Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          View Options

          Get Access

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media