Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3626705.3631789acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Through the Looking Glass: The Role of Virtual Mirrors in Shaping Empathy in Virtual Reality Perspective Taking

Published: 03 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

In this study, we explored the effect of seeing one’s avatar in a virtual mirror during a virtual reality (VR) perspective taking experience. Participants were divided into two groups, with one experiencing the VR environment with the presence of a mirror showcasing their avatar and the other without. Results revealed that the sense of presence was comparable across both groups. However, a notable difference emerged in terms of empathy; participants who viewed their avatars in the mirror exhibited reduced empathic responses. These findings illuminate the nuanced dynamics of self-representation in virtual environments, suggesting that inducing self-awareness through a virtual mirror in VR might have unintended emotional consequences.

References

[1]
Domna Banakou, Parasuram D Hanumanthu, and Mel Slater. 2016. Virtual embodiment of white people in a black virtual body leads to a sustained reduction in their implicit racial bias. Frontiers in human neuroscience (2016), 601.
[2]
Domna Banakou, Sameer Kishore, and Mel Slater. 2018. Virtually being Einstein results in an improvement in cognitive task performance and a decrease in age bias. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 917.
[3]
C Daniel Batson, Shannon Early, and Giovanni Salvarani. 1997. Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and social psychology bulletin 23, 7 (1997), 751–758.
[4]
Victoria Groom, Jeremy N Bailenson, and Clifford Nass. 2009. The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments. Social Influence 4, 3 (2009), 231–248.
[5]
D Fox Harrell and S Veeragoudar Harrell. 2012. Imagination, computation, and self-expression: Situated character and avatar mediated identity. Leonardo electronic almanac 17, 2 (2012).
[6]
D Fox Harrell and Chong-U Lim. 2017. Reimagining the avatar dream: Modeling social identity in digital media. Commun. ACM 60, 7 (2017), 50–61.
[7]
Fernanda Herrera, Jeremy Bailenson, Erika Weisz, Elise Ogle, and Jamil Zaki. 2018. Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PloS one 13, 10 (2018), e0204494.
[8]
Fernanda Herrera and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2021. Virtual reality perspective-taking at scale: Effect of avatar representation, choice, and head movement on prosocial behaviors. new media & society 23, 8 (2021), 2189–2209.
[9]
Lara Maister, Natalie Sebanz, Günther Knoblich, and Manos Tsakiris. 2013. Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition 128, 2 (2013), 170–178.
[10]
A Nikolaou, A Schwabe, and H Boomgaarden. 2022. Changing social attitudes with virtual reality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of the International Communication Association 46, 1 (2022), 30–61.
[11]
Soo Youn Oh, Jeremy Bailenson, Erika Weisz, and Jamil Zaki. 2016. Virtually old: Embodied perspective taking and the reduction of ageism under threat. Computers in Human Behavior 60 (2016), 398–410.
[12]
Tabitha C Peck, Sofia Seinfeld, Salvatore M Aglioti, and Mel Slater. 2013. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and cognition 22, 3 (2013), 779–787.
[13]
Thomas Schubert, Frank Friedmann, and Holger Regenbrecht. 2001. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 10, 3 (2001), 266–281.
[14]
Mel Slater and Martin Usoh. 1993. Presence in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE virtual reality annual international symposium. IEEE, 90–96.
[15]
Hui-Hsuan Tsao, Xin Lei, and Pei-Luen Patrick Rau. 2020. Design, development, and evaluation of a virtual aging simulation system. Educational Gerontology 46, 6 (2020), 317–330.
[16]
Austin Van Loon, Jeremy Bailenson, Jamil Zaki, Joshua Bostick, and Robb Willer. 2018. Virtual reality perspective-taking increases cognitive empathy for specific others. PloS one 13, 8 (2018), e0202442.
[17]
Nick Yee and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2006. Walk a mile in digital shoes: The impact of embodied perspective-taking on the reduction of negative stereotyping in immersive virtual environments. Proceedings of PRESENCE 24 (2006), 26.
[18]
Caglar Yildirim and D Fox Harrell. 2022. On the Plane: A Roleplaying Game for Simulating Ingroup-Outgroup Biases in Virtual Reality. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR). IEEE, 207–209.

Index Terms

  1. Through the Looking Glass: The Role of Virtual Mirrors in Shaping Empathy in Virtual Reality Perspective Taking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MUM '23: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
    December 2023
    607 pages
    ISBN:9798400709210
    DOI:10.1145/3626705
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 December 2023

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. VR perspective taking
    2. empathy
    3. looking in the mirror
    4. mirrors

    Qualifiers

    • Poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    MUM '23

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 84
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)67
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media