Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3626252.3630850acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Exploring Computing Students' Sense of Belonging Before and After a Collaborative Learning Course

Published: 07 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Prior work has found that women tend to report lower sense of belonging compared to men in STEM and computing contexts, which may discourage women's persistence. Collaborative learning has been shown to improve students' sense of belonging in some STEM and computing courses relative to traditional lecturing; however, these studies tend to focus on a single course or the first implementation of such pedagogical changes. Our study explores whether these trends generalize by measuring students' sense of belonging across three non-introductory computing courses that have consistently used collaborative learning activities over three semesters. We ask the following research question: Is collaborative learning generally associated with an increased sense of belonging, especially for women? We found that while there were variations across courses, students' reported sense of belonging improved in all courses. Notably, women's reported sense of belonging improved 15% whereas men's reported sense of belonging improved by 11%. Our findings complement prior studies by providing evidence of a relationship between increased sense of belonging and collaborative learning, and suggest students' sense of belonging is malleable beyond the first year. These findings challenge critiques of past studies as being isolated to single courses or conducted only immediately after an effort to change a course, suggesting pedagogical changes may hold promise in improving students' affective outcomes.

References

[1]
Kelly-Ann Allen, Margaret L. Kern, Christopher S. Rozek, Dennis M. McInerney, and George M. Slavich. 2021. Belonging: a review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Australian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 73, 1 (Jan. 2021), 87--102. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409.
[2]
Elliot Aronson. 2002. Building Empathy, Compassion, and Achievement in the Jigsaw Classroom. In Improving Academic Achievement: Impact of Psychological Factors on Education, Joshua Aronson (Ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 209--225.
[3]
Jürgen Buder, Daniel Bodemer, and Hiroaki Ogata. 2021. Group Awareness. In International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Ulrike Cress, Carolyn Rosé, Alyssa Friend Wise, and Jun Oshima (Eds.). Vol. 19. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
[4]
Rebecca Campbell-Montalvo, Gladis Kersaint, Chrystal A. S. Smith, Ellen Puccia, John Skvoretz, Hesborn Wao, Julie P. Martin, George MacDonald, and Reginald Lee. 2022. How stereotypes and relationships influence women and underrepresented minority students' fit in engineering. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 59, 4 (2022), 656--692. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/tea.21740.
[5]
Elizabeth A. Canning, Katherine Muenks, Dorainne J. Green, and Mary C. Murphy. 2019. STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, Vol. 5, 2 (February 2019), eaau4734. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
[6]
Heidi B. Carlone, Catherine M. Scott, and Cassi Lowder. 2014. Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students' identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 51, 7 (2014), 836--869.
[7]
Hongxuan Chen, Morgan M. Fong, Geoffrey L. Herman, and Mariana Silva. 2023. Student Autonomy in Collaborative Learning: Effects of Meeting Time and Team Consistency. In 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). College Station, TX, 1--9.
[8]
José M. Cámara-Zapata and Domingo Morales. 2020. Cooperative learning, student characteristics, and persistence: an experimental study in an engineering physics course. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 45, 4 (2020), 565--577.
[9]
Pierre Dillenbourg. 1999. What do you mean by 'collaborative learning'? In Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches 2 ed.), Pierre Dillenbourg (Ed.). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK.
[10]
Pierre Dillenbourg and Daniel Schneider. 1995. Mediating the Mechanisms Which Make Collaborative Learning Sometimes Effective. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, Vol. 1, 2 (1995), 131--146. Place: Charlottesville, VA Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
[11]
Danny Doucette, Russell Clark, and Chandralekha Singh. 2020. Hermione and the Secretary: how gendered task division in introductory physics labs can disrupt equitable learning. European Journal of Physics, Vol. 41, 3 (2020), 1--20.
[12]
Kemal Doymus. 2008. Teaching Chemical Equilibrium with the Jigsaw Technique. Research in Science Education, Vol. 38, 2 (2008), 249--260.
[13]
Shihui Feng, Shuming Qiu, David Gibson, and Dirk Ifenthaler. 2023. The Effect of Social Closeness on Perceived Satisfaction of Collaborative Learning. In Open and Inclusive Educational Practice in the Digital World, Dirk Ifenthaler, Demetrios G. Sampson, and Pedro Isaías (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 101--113.
[14]
S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, 23 (2014), 8410--8415.
[15]
Carol Frieze and Lenore Blum. 2002. Building an effective computer science student organization: the Carnegie Mellon women@SCS action plan. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 34, 2 (June 2002), 74--78.
[16]
Charlotte N. Gunawardena and Frank J. Zittle. 1997. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer?mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 11, 3 (1997), 8--26.
[17]
Patricia Heller and Mark Hollabaugh. 1992. Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, Vol. 60, 7 (July 1992), 637--644.
[18]
Geoffrey L. Herman and Sushmita Azad. 2020. A Comparison of Peer Instruction and Collaborative Problem Solving in a Computer Architecture Course. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Portland OR USA, 461--467.
[19]
Marybeth Hoffman, Jayne Richmond, Jennifer Morrow, and Kandice Salomone. 2002. Investigating "Sense of Belonging" in First-Year College Students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, Vol. 4, 3 (Nov. 2002), 227--256. Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
[20]
Helen H. Hu and Tricia D. Shepherd. 2013. Using POGIL to help students learn to program. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, Vol. 13, 3 (2013), 1--23.
[21]
Kathleen Isenegger, Kari L. George, Paul Bruno, and Colleen M. Lewis. 2023. Goal-Congruity Theory Predicts Students' Sense of Belonging in Computing Across Racial/Ethnic Groups. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. ACM, Toronto, ON, 1069--1075. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569834
[22]
Heisawn Jeong and Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver. 2016. Seven Affordances of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: How to Support Collaborative Learning? How Can Technologies Help? Educational Psychologist, Vol. 51, 2 (2016), 247--265. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654.
[23]
David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson, and Karl A. Smith. 1991. Cooperative learning: increasing college faculty instructional productivity. Number 4 in ASHE-ERIC higher education report. School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
[24]
Karel Kreijns, Paul A. Kirschner, and Wim Jochems. 2003. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 19, 3 (May 2003), 335--353.
[25]
Alexandra Kuznetsova, Per B. Brockhoff, and Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 82, 13 (2017), 1--26.
[26]
Eva Kyndt, Elisabeth Raes, Bart Lismont, Fran Timmers, Eduardo Cascallar, and Filip Dochy. 2013. A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, Vol. 10 (2013), 133--149.
[27]
Celine Latulipe, Audrey Rorrer, and Bruce Long. 2018. Longitudinal Data on Flipped Class Effects on Performance in CS1 and Retention after CS1. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Baltimore Maryland USA, 411--416.
[28]
Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee. 2009. To Reveal or To Cloak? Effects of Identity Salience on Stereotype Threat Responses in Avatar-Represented Group Contexts. International Journal of Internet Science, Vol. 4, 1 (2009), 34--49.
[29]
Elizabeth Litzler and Cate Samuelson. 2013. How underrepresented minority engineering students derive a sense of belonging from engineering. In Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASEE, Atlanta, Georgia, 1--20.
[30]
Heidy Maldonado, Scott R. Klemmer, and Roy D. Pea. 2009. When is collaborating with friends a good idea? insights from design education. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - CSCL'09, Vol. 1. Association for Computational Linguistics, Rhodes, Greece, 227--231.
[31]
Allison Master, Andrew N. Meltzoff, and Sapna Cheryan. 2021. Gender stereotypes about interests start early and cause gender disparities in computer science and engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 118, 48 (Nov. 2021), e2100030118. Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[32]
Lorelle Meadows and Denise Sekaquaptewa. 2013. The Influence of Gender Stereotypes on Role Adoption in Student Teams. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. ASEE Conferences, Atlanta, Georgia, 23.1217.1 -- 23.1217.16.
[33]
Larry K. Michaelsen and Michael Sweet. 2008. The essential elements of team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 2008, 116 (2008), 7--27.
[34]
Richard S. Moog, James N. Spencer, and Andrei R. Straumanis. 2006. Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning: POGIL and the POGIL Project. Metropolitan Universities, Vol. 17, 4 (2006), 41--52.
[35]
Sukanya Kannan Moudgalya, Chris Mayfield, Aman Yadav, Helen H. Hu, and Clif Kussmaul. 2021. Measuring Students' Sense of Belonging in Introductory CS Courses. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Virtual Event USA, 445--451.
[36]
Anja Møgelvang, Vigdis Vandvik, Ståle Ellingsen, Christian Bianchi Strømme, and Sehoya Cotner. 2023. Cooperative learning goes online: teaching and learning intervention in a digital environment impacts psychosocial outcomes in biology students. International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 117 (Jan. 2023), 102114.
[37]
Panayiotis Panayides. 2013. Coefficient alpha: Interpret with caution. Europe's Journal of Psychology, Vol. 9, 4 (11 2013).
[38]
R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. R package version 4.2.2.
[39]
Katherine Rainey, Melissa Dancy, Roslyn Mickelson, Elizabeth Stearns, and Stephanie Moller. 2018. Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 5, 1 (Dec. 2018), 10.
[40]
Linda J. Sax, Jennifer M. Blaney, Kathleen J. Lehman, Sarah L. Rodriguez, Kari L. George, and Christina Zavala. 2018. Sense of Belonging in Computing: The Role of Introductory Courses for Women and Underrepresented Minority Students. Social Sciences, Vol. 7, 8 (Aug. 2018), 122.
[41]
Niral Shah and Colleen M. Lewis. 2019. Amplifying and Attenuating Inequity in Collaborative Learning: Toward an Analytical Framework. Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 37, 4 (2019), 423--452.
[42]
Karl A. Smith. 1996. Cooperative learning: Making "groupwork" work. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 1996, 67 (1996), 71--82.
[43]
Karthikeyan Umapathy and Albert D. Ritzhaupt. 2017. A Meta-Analysis of Pair-Programming in Computer Programming Courses: Implications for Educational Practice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, Vol. 17, 4 (2017), 1--13.
[44]
Purdue University. 2023. Welcome to CATME - Smarter Teamwork.
[45]
Joanna Perry Weaver, Marci S. Decaro, Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, and Patricia A. Ralston. 2016. Social Belonging and First-Year Engineering Mathematics: A Collaborative Learning Intervention. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). New Orleans, LA. ISSN: 2153--5965.
[46]
L. Williams, R.R. Kessler, W. Cunningham, and R. Jeffries. 2000. Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software, Vol. 17, 4 (2000), 19--25. Conference Name: IEEE Software.
[47]
Aman Yadav, Chris Mayfield, Sukanya Kannan Moudgalya, Clif Kussmaul, and Helen H. Hu. 2021. Collaborative Learning, Self-Efficacy, and Student Performance in CS1 POGIL. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Virtual Event USA, 775--781. io

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)"In the Beginning, I Couldn't Necessarily Do Anything With It": Links Between Compiler Error Messages and Sense of BelongingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671105(14-26)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1
March 2024
1583 pages
ISBN:9798400704239
DOI:10.1145/3626252
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 March 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. collaborative learning
  2. linear regression
  3. online learning
  4. undergraduate education

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGCSE 2024
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE Virtual 2024
1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
December 5 - 8, 2024
Virtual Event , NC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)315
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)35
Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)"In the Beginning, I Couldn't Necessarily Do Anything With It": Links Between Compiler Error Messages and Sense of BelongingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671105(14-26)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media