Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3623809.3623966acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Cyclists' Perception of Automated Shuttle Buses in Shared Spaces

Published: 04 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

As automated shuttle buses gradually become a part of urban traffic solutions, their interactions with vulnerable road users need careful consideration. However, the cyclists’ perspectives on autonomous shuttle buses have not been explored extensively. This research addresses this gap by surveying 50 cyclists who regularly encounter automated shuttle buses. The results show that, in general, cyclists exhibit a high level of trust in the safety of the buses. Nevertheless, approximately one-third of the cyclists expressed disapproval as the buses tend to drive on the bicycle lane, leading them to wish for infrastructural solutions to avoid forcing cyclists to divert to pedestrian walkways. Identifying potential conflicts like these is vital for the development of effective and acceptable human-agent interactions in road traffic environments.

References

[1]
Franziska Babel, Philipp Hock, Sam Thellman, and Tom Ziemke. 2023. Cars As Social Agents (CarSA): A Perspective Shift in Human–Vehicle Interaction. In International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI ’23) (Gothenburg, Sweden) (HAI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3623809.3623979
[2]
Jason Borenstein, Joseph R. Herkert, and Keith W. Miller. 2019. Self-Driving Cars and Engineering Ethics: The Need for a System Level Analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics 25, 2 (2019), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0006-0
[3]
Antonio Bucchiarone, Sandro Battisti, Annapaola Marconi, Roberto Maldacea, and Diego Cardona Ponce. 2021. Autonomous Shuttle-as-a-Service (ASaaS): Challenges, Opportunities, and Social Implications. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22, 6 (2021), 3790–3799. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.3025670 arxiv:2001.09763
[4]
Grace Eden, Benjamin Nanchen, Randolf Ramseyer, and Florian Evéquoz. 2017. On the road with an autonomous passenger shuttle: Integration in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1569–1576.
[5]
Eva Kassens-Noor, Meng Cai, Zeenat Kotval-Karamchandani, and Travis Decaminada. 2021. Autonomous vehicles and mobility for people with special needs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 150 (aug 2021), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.014
[6]
Mirjam Lanzer, Franziska Babel, Fei Yan, Bihan Zhang, Fang You, Jianmin Wang, and Martin Baumann. 2020. Designing Communication Strategies of Autonomous Vehicles with Pedestrians: An Intercultural Study. Proceedings - 12th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2020 (2020), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410653
[7]
Hannah R.M. Pelikan. 2021. Why autonomous driving is so hard: The social dimension of traffic. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3447133
[8]
Petr Pokorny, Belma Skender, Torkel Bjørnskau, and Marjan P. Hagenzieker. 2021. Video observation of encounters between the automated shuttles and other traffic participants along an approach to right-hand priority T-intersection. European Transport Research Review 13, 1 (2021), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00518-x
[9]
Amir Rasouli and John K Tsotsos. 2019. Autonomous vehicles that interact with pedestrians: A survey of theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 21, 3 (2019), 900–918.
[10]
Sam Thellman, Maartje de Graaf, and Tom Ziemke. 2022. Mental state attribution to robots: A systematic review of conceptions, methods, and findings. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 11, 4 (2022), 1–51.
[11]
Sam Thellman, Erik Marsja, Anna Anund, and Tom Ziemke. 2023. Will It Yield? Expectations on Automated Shuttle Bus Interactions With Pedestrians and Bicyclists. In HRI’23: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580091
[12]
Sam Thellman and Tom Ziemke. 2021. The perceptual belief problem: Why explainability is a tough challenge in social robotics. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 10, 3 (2021), 1–15.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)2nd Workshop on Cars As Social Agents (CarSA): Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human–Vehicle InteractionAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685460(1-3)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Cycling with Robots: How Long-Term Interaction Experience with Automated Shuttle Buses Shapes Cyclist AttitudesCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640594(1043-1047)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
HAI '23: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
December 2023
506 pages
ISBN:9798400708244
DOI:10.1145/3623809
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 December 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. attitudes
  2. bicyclist
  3. conflicts
  4. human-vehicle interaction
  5. trust

Qualifiers

  • Poster
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • ELLIIT

Conference

HAI '23

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 121 of 404 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)2nd Workshop on Cars As Social Agents (CarSA): Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human–Vehicle InteractionAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685460(1-3)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Cycling with Robots: How Long-Term Interaction Experience with Automated Shuttle Buses Shapes Cyclist AttitudesCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640594(1043-1047)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media