A Quantitative Approach to Identifying Emergent Editor Roles in Open Street Map
Article No.: 487, Pages 1 - 14
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate and classify the roles, or distinct contribution styles, adopted by participants within the OpenStreetMap (OSM) community. Using a quantitative analysis of mapping behaviors, we devised a methodology to identify distinct features associated with specific roles. We used an unsupervised clustering approach and unveiled eight discernible roles, or types of mapper in OSM. Each role displays specific patterns of mapping behaviors related to their habits and preferences for adding or editing map objects over time. We validated our roles, in part, using known affiliations with humanitarian and corporate organizations. Using these roles, we examine community composition and contributor retention over time. Our contributions include applying existing methods on the analysis of contributor behavior in online platforms to OSM, the identification of eight roles that can guide future research and design within OSM, and further understanding into the overall trajectory of the world’s largest geospatial peer production community.
Supplemental Material
- Download
- 23.52 MB
- Transcript
References
[1]
2020. Curious Cases of Corporations in OpenStreetMap. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3923050
[2]
2021. Community interactions in OSM editing. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5112211
[3]
Amina Aitsi-Selmi, Virginia Murray, Chadia Wannous, Chloe Dickinson, David Johnston, Akiyuki Kawasaki, Anne-Sophie Stevance, and Tiffany Yeung. 2016. Reflections on a Science and Technology Agenda for 21st Century Disaster Risk Reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 7 (03 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-016-0081-x
[4]
João Porto de Albuquerque, Benjamin Herfort, and Melanie Eckle. 2016. The tasks of the crowd: A typology of tasks in geographic information crowdsourcing and a case study in humanitarian mapping. Remote Sensing 8, 10 (2016), 859.
[5]
Jennings Anderson, Dipto Sarkar, and Leysia Palen. 2019. Corporate Editors in the Evolving Landscape of OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8, 5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8050232
[6]
Ofer Arazy, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, and Adam Balila. 2019. Neither a Bazaar nor a cathedral: The interplay between structure and agency in Wikipedia’s role system. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70, 1 (2019), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24076 arXiv:https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asi.24076
[7]
Ofer Arazy, Hila Liifshitz-Assaf, Oded Nov, Johannes Daxenberger, Martina Balestra, and Coye Cheshire. 2017. On the "How" and "Why" of Emergent Role Behaviors in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2039–2051. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998317
[8]
Ofer Arazy, Aron Lindberg, Shakked Lev, Kexian Wu, and Alex Yarovoy. 2020. Emergent Routines in Peer-Production: Examining the Temporal Evolution of Wikipedia’s Work Sequences. Trans. Soc. Comput. 3, 1, Article 5 (feb 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366711
[9]
Ofer Arazy, Felipe Ortega, Oded Nov, Lisa Yeo, and Adam Balila. 2015. Functional Roles and Career Paths in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675257
[10]
Daniel Bégin, Rodolphe Devillers, and Stéphane Roche. 2018. The life cycle of contributors in collaborative online communities -the case of OpenStreetMap. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 32, 8 (2018), 1611–1630. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1458312
[11]
Bruce J. Biddle. 1979. Role theory : expectations, identities and behaviors / [by] Bruce J. Biddle. Academic Press New York [etc.] ; London. xi, 416 p. : pages. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/els031/79006930.html
[12]
[12] bots in OSM 2023. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bot
[13]
Nama R. Budhathoki and Caroline Haythornthwaite. 2013. Motivation for Open Collaboration: Crowd and Community Models and the Case of OpenStreetMap. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5 (2013), 548–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469364 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469364
[14]
Zhilong Chen, Hancheng Cao, Huangdong Wang, Fengli Xu, Vassilis Kostakos, and Yong Li. 2020. Will You Come Back / Check-in Again? Understanding Characteristics Leading to Urban Revisitation and Re-Check-In. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 3, Article 76 (sep 2020), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411812
[15]
Steve Coast. 2011. How OpenStreetMap Is Changing the World. In Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems, Katsumi Tanaka, Peter Fröhlich, and Kyoung-Sook Kim (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 4–4.
[16]
Maitraye Das, Brent Hecht, and Darren Gergle. 2019. The Gendered Geography of Contributions to OpenStreetMap: Complexities in Self-Focus Bias. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300793
[17]
Martin Dittus, Giovanni Quattrone, and Licia Capra. 2016. Analysing volunteer engagement in humanitarian mapping: building contributor communities at large scale. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 108–118.
[18]
[18] Every door 2023. https://every-door.app/
[19]
Seth Fitzsimmons. 2017. Querying OpenStreetMap with Amazon Athena. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/querying-openstreetmap-with-amazon-athena/
[20]
Michael F. Goodchild. 2007. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography - geojournal. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
[21]
Benjamin Herfort, Sven Lautenbach, João Porto de Albuquerque, Jennings Anderson, and Alexander Zipf. 2021. The evolution of humanitarian mapping within the OpenStreetMap community. Scientific reports 11, 1 (2021), 3037.
[22]
HOTOSM 2022. https://www.hotosm.org/
[23]
[23] Imports in OSM 2023. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
[24]
Kent Jacobs and Scott Mitchell. 2020. OpenStreetMap quality assessment using unsupervised machine learning methods. Transactions in GIS (08 2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12680
[25]
Brian Keegan. 2015. Emergent Social Roles in Wikipedia’s Breaking News Collaborations. (01 2015), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05467-4_4
[26]
Brian Keegan and Casey Fiesler. 2017. The Evolution and Consequences of Peer Producing Wikipedia’s Rules. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 11, 1 (May 2017), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14899
[27]
Jun Liu and Sudha Ram. 2011. Who Does What: Collaboration Patterns in the Wikipedia and Their Impact on Article Quality. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2, 2, Article 11 (jul 2011), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985352
[28]
Zarif Mahmud, Aarjav Chauhan, Dipto Sarkar, and Robert Soden. 2022. Revisiting Engagement in Humanitarian Mapping: An Updated Analysis of Contributor Retention in OpenStreetMap. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 251, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519728
[29]
[29] MapRoulette. 2023. https://maproulette.org/
[30]
Alan McConchie. 2013. From Wiki Gardening to Map Gardening: Analyzing Contribution Patterns in OpenStreetMap. State of the Map US (9 Jun 2013).
[31]
Peter Mooney and Padraig Corcoran. 2012. How social is OpenStreetMap? (01 2012).
[32]
Claudia Müller-Birn, Benjamin Karran, Janette Lehmann, and Markus Luczak-Rösch. 2015. Peer-Production System or Collaborative Ontology Engineering Effort: What is Wikidata?. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (San Francisco, California) (OpenSym ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2788993.2789836
[33]
[33] Pascal Neis. 2017. https://twitter.com/pascal_n/status/891691824817033217
[34]
[34] Pascal Neis. 2023. https://neis-one.org/2023/06/exploring-reverted-map-edits-in-osm/
[35]
Pascal Neis and Alexander Zipf. 2012. Analyzing the Contributor Activity of a Volunteered Geographic Information Project — The Case of OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 1 (12 2012), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi1020146
[36]
Registry of Open Data on AWS. 2023. OpenStreetMap on AWS. https://registry.opendata.aws/osm/
[37]
Leysia Palen, Robert Soden, T Jennings Anderson, and Mario Barrenechea. 2015. Success & scale in a data-producing organization: The socio-technical evolution of OpenStreetMap in response to humanitarian events. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 4113–4122.
[38]
Dipto Sarkar and Jennings T. Anderson. 2022. Corporate editors in OpenStreetMap: Investigating co-editing patterns. Transactions in GIS 26, 4 (2022), 1879–1897. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12910 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/tgis.12910
[39]
Akrati Saxena and Harita Reddy. 2021. Users roles identification on online crowdsourced Q&A platforms and encyclopedias: a survey. Journal of Computational Social Science 5 (06 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00125-9
[40]
Stefan Scholz, Paul Knight, Melanie Eckle, Sabrina Marx, and Alexander Zipf. 2018. Volunteered Geographic Information for Disaster Risk Reduction—The Missing Maps Approach and Its Potential within the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Remote Sensing 10, 8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081239
[41]
Sonali Shah. 2006. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science 52, 7 (2006), 1000–1014. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553
[42]
Robert Soden and Leysia Palen. 2014. From crowdsourced mapping to community mapping: The post-earthquake work of OpenStreetMap Haiti. In COOP 2014-Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 27-30 May 2014, Nice (France). Springer, 311–326.
[43]
Stats - OpenStreetMap Wiki 2023. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stats
[44]
Monica Stephens. 2013. Gender and the GeoWeb: divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information. GeoJournal 78, 6 (2013), 981–996. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24432638
[45]
[45] Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team. 2023. https://tasks.hotosm.org/
[46]
Veniamin Veselovsky, Dipto Sarkar, Jennings Anderson, and Robert Soden. 2022. An Automated Approach to Identifying Corporate Editing. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 16, 1 (May 2022), 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19357
[47]
OpenStreetMap Wiki. 2022. Main Page — OpenStreetMap Wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?
[48]
Kazuhiro Yamashita, Shane McIntosh, Yasutaka Kamei, Ahmed E. Hassan, and Naoyasu Ubayashi. 2015. Revisiting the Applicability of the Pareto Principle to Core Development Teams in Open Source Software Projects. In Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (Bergamo, Italy) (IWPSE 2015). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804360.2804366
[49]
Diyi Yang, Aaron Halfaker, Robert Kraut, and Eduard Hovy. 2021. Who Did What: Editor Role Identification in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 10 (08 2021), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14732
[50]
Taha Yasseri, Robert Sumi, and János Kertész. 2012. Circadian Patterns of Wikipedia Editorial Activity: A Demographic Analysis. PloS one 7 (01 2012), e30091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030091
Index Terms
- A Quantitative Approach to Identifying Emergent Editor Roles in Open Street Map
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Activity-based analysis of open source software contributors: roles and dynamics
CHASE '19: Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software EngineeringContributors to open source software (OSS) communities assume diverse roles to take different responsibilities. One major limitation of the current OSS tools and platforms is that they provide a uniform user interface regardless of the activities ...
Predicting Member Productivity and Withdrawal from Pre-Joining Attachments in Online Production Groups
CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingProductive and dedicated members are critical to the success of online production communities like Wikipedia. Many communities organize in subgroups where members voluntarily work on projects of shared interest. In this paper, we investigate how members'...
Emergent Life Cycle: The Tension Between Knowledge Change and Knowledge Retention in Open Online Coproduction Communities
Online coproduction communities often face a challenge of whether to change or retain the knowledge they have created. Disparate and often conflicting theoretical models have been used to explain how these communities respond to this tension. We ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
18961 pages
ISBN:9798400703300
DOI:10.1145/3613904
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 11 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%
Upcoming Conference
CHI '25
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 303Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)303
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format