Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Sociotechnical Audits: Broadening the Algorithm Auditing Lens to Investigate Targeted Advertising

Published: 04 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Algorithm audits are powerful tools for studying black-box systems without direct knowledge of their inner workings. While very effective in examining technical components, the method stops short of a sociotechnical frame, which would also consider users themselves as an integral and dynamic part of the system. Addressing this limitation, we propose the concept of sociotechnical auditing: auditing methods that evaluate algorithmic systems at the sociotechnical level, focusing on the interplay between algorithms and users as each impacts the other. Just as algorithm audits probe an algorithm with varied inputs and observe outputs, a sociotechnical audit (STA) additionally probes users, exposing them to different algorithmic behavior and measuring their resulting attitudes and behaviors. As an example of this method, we develop Intervenr, a platform for conducting browser-based, longitudinal sociotechnical audits with consenting, compensated participants. Intervenr investigates the algorithmic content users encounter online, and also coordinates systematic client-side interventions to understand how users change in response. As a case study, we deploy Intervenr in a two-week sociotechnical audit of online advertising (N = 244) to investigate the central premise that personalized ad targeting is more effective on users. In the first week, we observe and collect all browser ads delivered to users, and in the second, we deploy an ablation-style intervention that disrupts normal targeting by randomly pairing participants and swapping all their ads. We collect user-oriented metrics (self-reported ad interest and feeling of representation) and advertiser-oriented metrics (ad views, clicks, and recognition) throughout, along with a total of over 500,000 ads. Our STA finds that targeted ads indeed perform better with users, but also that users begin to acclimate to different ads in only a week, casting doubt on the primacy of personalized ad targeting given the impact of repeated exposure. In comparison with other evaluation methods that only study technical components, or only experiment on users, sociotechnical audits evaluate sociotechnical systems through the interplay of their technical and human components.

References

[1]
Muhammad Ali, Piotr Sapiezynski, Miranda Bogen, Aleksandra Korolova, Alan Mislove, and Aaron Rieke. 2019. Discrimination through Optimization: How Facebook's Ad Delivery Can Lead to Biased Outcomes. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 199 (Nov 2019), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359301
[2]
Muhammad Ali, Piotr Sapiezynski, Aleksandra Korolova, Alan Mislove, and Aaron Rieke. 2021. Ad Delivery Algorithms: The Hidden Arbiters of Political Messaging. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Virtual Event, Israel) (WSDM '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3437963.3441801
[3]
Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias: There's software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it's biased against blacks. ProPublica, May 23.
[4]
Julia Angwin and Terry Parris Jr. 2016. Facebook Lets Advertisers Exclude Users by Race. ProPublica (2016). https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-lets-advertisers-exclude-users-by-race
[5]
Anocha Aribarg and Eric M. Schwartz. 2020. Native Advertising in Online News: Trade-Offs Among Clicks, Brand Recognition, and Website Trustworthiness. Journal of Marketing Research 57 (2020), 20 -- 34.
[6]
Joshua Asplund, Motahhare Eslami, Hari Sundaram, Christian Sandvig, and Karrie Karahalios. 2020. Auditing Race and Gender Discrimination in Online Housing Markets. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 14. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, 24--35. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7276
[7]
Eytan Bakshy, Dean Eckles, Rong Yan, and Itamar Rosenn. 2012. Social Influence in Social Advertising: Evidence from Field Experiments. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (Valencia, Spain) (EC '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 146--161. https://doi.org/10.1145/2229012.2229027
[8]
Jack Bandy. 2021. Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Audits. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 74 (apr 2021), 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449148
[9]
Brakkton Booker. 2019. Housing Department Slaps Facebook With Discrimination Charge. https://www.npr.org/2019/03/28/707614254/hud-slaps-facebook-with-housing-discrimination-charge
[10]
Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 81), Sorelle A. Friedler and Christo Wilson (Eds.). PMLR, 77--91. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html
[11]
Ho-Chun Herbert Chang, Matt Bui, and Charlton McIlwain. 2021. Targeted Ads and/as Racial Discrimination: Exploring Trends in New York City Ads for College Scholarships. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.15294 (2021).
[12]
Le Chen, Ruijun Ma, Anikó Hannák, and Christo Wilson. 2018. Investigating the Impact of Gender on Rank in Resume Search Engines. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174225
[13]
Le Chen, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2015. Peeking beneath the hood of uber. In Proceedings of the 2015 internet measurement conference. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 495--508.
[14]
Albert Cherns. 1976. The principles of sociotechnical design. Human relations 29, 8 (1976), 783--792.
[15]
Sasha Costanza-Chock, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Joy Buolamwini. 2022. Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a Field Scan of the Algorithmic Auditing Ecosystem. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1571--1583. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533213
[16]
Clara Crivellaro, Alex Taylor, Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Rob Comber, Bettina Nissen, and Peter Wright. 2016. Re-Making Places: HCI, 'Community Building' and Change. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2958--2969. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858332
[17]
Amit Datta, Michael Carl Tschantz, and Anupam Datta. 2014. Automated experiments on ad privacy settings: A tale of opacity, choice, and discrimination. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.6491 (2014).
[18]
Lois Anne DeLong. 2021. Facebook Disables Ad Observatory; Academicians and Journalists Fire Back. https://cyber.nyu.edu/2021/08/21/facebook-disables-ad-observatory-academicians-and-journalists-fire-back/
[19]
Benjamin Edelman, Michael Luca, and Dan Svirsky. 2017. Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9, 2 (2017), 1--22.
[20]
Motahhare Eslami, Sneha R. Krishna Kumaran, Christian Sandvig, and Karrie Karahalios. 2018. Communicating Algorithmic Process in Online Behavioral Advertising. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174006
[21]
Irfan Faizullabhoy and Aleksandra Korolova. 2018. Facebook's advertising platform: New attack vectors and the need for interventions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10099 (2018).
[22]
David Flint. 1988. Philosophy and principles of auditing: an introduction. Macmillan Education.
[23]
E. Goffman. 1979. Gender Advertisements. Harper & Row. https://books.google.com/books?id=HXxHAAAAMAAJ
[24]
Megan Graham. 2019. Digital ad revenue in the US surpassed $100 billion for the first time in 2018. CNBC (2019). https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/07/digital-ad-revenue-in-the-us-topped-100-billion-for-the-first-time.html
[25]
Tim Hwang. 2020. Subprime attention crisis: advertising and the time bomb at the heart of the Internet. FSG originals.
[26]
Basileal Imana, Aleksandra Korolova, and John Heidemann. 2021. Auditing for discrimination in algorithms delivering job ads. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 3767--3778.
[27]
Ramesh Johari, Pete Koomen, Leonid Pekelis, and David Walsh. 2017. Peeking at A/B Tests: Why It Matters, and What to Do about It. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Halifax, NS, Canada) (KDD '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1517--1525. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3097992
[28]
Jeff Johnson, Manoj Hastak, Bernard J. Jansen, and Devesh Raval. 2018. Analyzing Advertising Labels: Testing Consumers' Recognition of Paid Content Online. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188533
[29]
Levi Kaplan, Nicole Gerzon, Alan Mislove, and Piotr Sapiezynski. 2022. Measurement and Analysis of Implied Identity in Ad Delivery Optimization. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference (Nice, France) (IMC '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 195--209. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517745.3561450
[30]
Matthew Kay, Cynthia Matuszek, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. ACM Press, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 3819--3828. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702520
[31]
Ron Kohavi, Diane Tang, Ya Xu, Lars G Hemkens, and John Ioannidis. 2020. Online randomized controlled experiments at scale: lessons and extensions to medicine. Trials 21, 1 (2020), 1--9.
[32]
Cameron Lai and Markus Luczak-Roesch. 2019. You Can't See What You Can't See: Experimental Evidence for How Much Relevant Information May Be Missed Due to Google's Web Search Personalisation. In Social Informatics, Ingmar Weber, Kareem M. Darwish, Claudia Wagner, Emilio Zagheni, Laura Nelson, Samin Aref, and Fabian Flöck (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 253--266.
[33]
Michelle S Lam, Mitchell L Gordon, Danaë Metaxa, Jeffrey T Hancock, James A Landay, and Michael S Bernstein. 2022. End-User Audits: A System Empowering Communities to Lead Large-Scale Investigations of Harmful Algorithmic Behavior. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1--34.
[34]
Anja Lambrecht and Catherine Tucker. 2019. Algorithmic bias? An empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of STEM career ads. Management science 65, 7 (2019), 2966--2981.
[35]
Emma Lurie and Deirdre K. Mulligan. 2021. Searching for Representation: A sociotechnical audit of googling for members of U.S. Congress. arXiv:2109.07012 [cs.CY]
[36]
Ulrik Lyngs, Kai Lukoff, Petr Slovak, William Seymour, Helena Webb, Marina Jirotka, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2020. 'I Just Want to Hack Myself to Not Get Distracted': Evaluating Design Interventions for Self-Control on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376672
[37]
Arunesh Mathur, Arvind Narayanan, and Marshini Chetty. 2018. Endorsements on Social Media: An Empirical Study of Affiliate Marketing Disclosures on YouTube and Pinterest. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 119 (nov 2018), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274388
[38]
Arunesh Mathur, Jessica Vitak, Arvind Narayanan, and Marshini Chetty. 2018. Characterizing the Use of Browser-Based Blocking Extensions To Prevent Online Tracking. In Fourteenth symposium on usable privacy and security (SOUPS 2018). 103--116.
[39]
J. Nathan Matias. 2023. Humans and algorithms work together-so study them together. Nature 617, 7960 (2023), 248--251.
[40]
J. Nathan Matias. 2023. Influencing recommendation algorithms to reduce the spread of unreliable news by encouraging humans to fact-check articles, in a field experiment. Scientific Reports 13, 1 (2023), 11715.
[41]
Charlton McIlwain. 2023. Algorithmic Discrimination: A Framework and Approach to Auditing & Measuring the Impact of Race-Targeted Digital Advertising. PolicyLink (May 2023).
[42]
Leland McInnes and John Healy. 2017. Accelerated Hierarchical Density Based Clustering. In Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, IEEE, New York, NY, 33--42.
[43]
L. McInnes, J. Healy, and J. Melville. 2018. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction. ArXiv e-prints (Feb 2018), 63 pages. arXiv:1802.03426 [stat.ML]
[44]
Danaë Metaxa. 2023. Bias and Discrimination in Digital Advertising. PolicyLink (May 2023).
[45]
Danaë Metaxa, Michelle A Gan, Su Goh, Jeff Hancock, and James A Landay. 2021. An image of society: Gender and racial representation and impact in image search results for occupations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--23.
[46]
Danaë Metaxa, Joon Sung Park, James A. Landay, and Jeff Hancock. 2019. Search Media and Elections: A Longitudinal Investigation of Political Search Results. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 129 (Nov 2019), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359231
[47]
Danaë Metaxa, Joon Sung Park, Ronald E Robertson, Karrie Karahalios, Christo Wilson, Jeff Hancock, Christian Sandvig, et al . 2021. Auditing algorithms: Understanding algorithmic systems from the outside in. Foundations and Trends® in Human--Computer Interaction 14, 4 (2021), 272--344.
[48]
Richard Meyes, Melanie Lu, Constantin Waubert de Puiseau, and Tobias Meisen. 2019. Ablation studies in artificial neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08644 (2019).
[49]
Mozilla. 2021. Take back control from the algorithm. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/youtube/regretsreporter/.
[50]
Mozilla. 2021. Take control over your data with Rally, a novel privacy-first data sharing platform. https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/take-control-over-your-data-with-rally-a-novel-privacy-first-data-sharing-platform/.
[51]
Eni Mustafaraj, Emma Lurie, and Claire Devine. 2020. The Case for Voter-Centered Audits of Search Engines during Political Elections. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Barcelona, Spain) (FAT* '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 559--569. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372835
[52]
Helen Nissenbaum and Howe Daniel. 2009. TrackMeNot: Resisting Surveillance in Web Search. Lessons from the Identity Trail: Anonymity, Privacy, and Identity in a Networked Society 1, 1 (2009), 23 pages.
[53]
Ziad Obermeyer, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 6464 (2019), 447--453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342 arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aax2342
[54]
Andrew Perrin. 2021. Mobile Technology and Home Broadband 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/06/03/mobile-technology-and-home-broadband-2021/
[55]
Christopher Pollitt and Hilkka Summa. 1996. Performance audit and evaluation: Similar tools, different relationships? New Directions for Evaluation 1996, 71 (1996), 29--50.
[56]
Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. 2021. Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2103.00020
[57]
Inioluwa Deborah Raji and Joy Buolamwini. 2019. Actionable Auditing: Investigating the Impact of Publicly Naming Biased Performance Results of Commercial AI Products. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Honolulu, HI, USA) (AIES '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 429--435. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314244
[58]
Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Andrew Smart, Rebecca N. White, Margaret Mitchell, Timnit Gebru, Ben Hutchinson, Jamila Smith-Loud, Daniel Theron, and Parker Barnes. 2020. Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Barcelona, Spain) (FAT* '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 33--44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873
[59]
Byron Reeves, Nilam Ram, Thomas N. Robinson, James J. Cummings, C. Lee Giles, Jennifer Pan, Agnese Chiatti, Mj Cho, Katie Roehrick, Xiao Yang, Anupriya Gagneja, Miriam Brinberg, Daniel Muise, Yingdan Lu, Mufan Luo, Andrew Fitzgerald, and Leo Yeykelis. 2021. Screenomics: A Framework to Capture and Analyze Personal Life Experiences and the Ways that Technology Shapes Them. Human--Computer Interaction 36, 2 (2021), 150--201. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2019.1578652 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2019.1578652 33867652.
[60]
Marc Resnick and William Albert. 2014. The Impact of Advertising Location and User Task on the Emergence of Banner Ad Blindness: An Eye-Tracking Study. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 30, 3 (2014), 206--219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.847762 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.847762
[61]
Ronald E. Robertson, Shan Jiang, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, David Lazer, and Christo Wilson. 2018. Auditing Partisan Audience Bias within Google Search. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 148 (Nov 2018), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274417
[62]
Lydia Saad. 2015. Most Smartphone Users Still Rely on Computer for Web Purchases. https://news.gallup.com/poll/184037/smartphone-users-rely-computer-web-purchases.aspx
[63]
Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios, and Cedric Langbort. 2014. Auditing Algorithms: Research Methods for Detecting Discrimination on Internet Platforms. Data and discrimination: converting critical concerns into productive inquiry 22 (2014), 23 pages.
[64]
Piotr Sapiezynski, Avijit Ghosh, Levi Kaplan, Aaron Rieke, and Alan Mislove. 2022. Algorithms that" Don't See Color" Measuring Biases in Lookalike and Special Ad Audiences. In Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 609--616.
[65]
Eduardo Schnadower Mustri, Idris Adjerid, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2023. Behavioral Advertising and Consumer Welfare: An Empirical Investigation. Available at SSRN 4398428 (2023). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4398428
[66]
Hong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, and Kenneth Holstein. 2021. Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic Behaviors. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 433 (Oct 2021), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479577
[67]
Till Speicher, Muhammad Ali, Giridhari Venkatadri, Filipe Ribeiro, George Arvanitakis, Fabrício Benevenuto, Krishna Gummadi, Patrick Loiseau, and Alan Mislove. 2018. Potential for discrimination in online targeted advertising. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 81), Sorelle A. Friedler and Christo Wilson (Eds.). PMLR, 5--19. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/speicher18a.html
[68]
Erin J Strahan, Anne E Wilson, Kate E Cressman, and Vanessa M Buote. 2006. Comparing to perfection: How cultural norms for appearance affect social comparisons and self-image. Body image 3, 3 (2006), 211--227.
[69]
Latanya Sweeney. 2013. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery. Queue 11, 3, Article 10 (March 2013), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460276.2460278
[70]
Catherine E. Tucker. 2014. Social Networks, Personalized Advertising, and Privacy Controls. Journal of Marketing Research 51, 5 (2014), 546--562. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0355 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0355
[71]
Giridhari Venkatadri and Alan Mislove. 2020. On the Potential for Discrimination via Composition. In Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference. 333--344.
[72]
Christo Wilson, Avijit Ghosh, Shan Jiang, Alan Mislove, Lewis Baker, Janelle Szary, Kelly Trindel, and Frida Polli. 2021. Building and Auditing Fair Algorithms: A Case Study in Candidate Screening. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Virtual Event, Canada) (FAccT '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 666--677. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445928
[73]
Eric Zeng, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. 2021. What Makes a ?Bad" Ad? User Perceptions of Problematic Online Advertising. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 361, 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445459
[74]
Eric Zeng, Rachel McAmis, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. 2022. What Factors Affect Targeting and Bids in Online Advertising? A Field Measurement Study. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference (Nice, France) (IMC '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 210--229. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517745.3561460

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)From Transparency to Accountability and Back: A Discussion of Access and Evidence in AI AuditingProceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization10.1145/3689904.3694711(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Lower Quantity, Higher Quality: Auditing News Content and User Perceptions on Twitter/X Algorithmic versus Chronological TimelinesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870468:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad TargetingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869178:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue CSCW2
CSCW
October 2023
4055 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3626953
Issue’s Table of Contents
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 October 2023
Published in PACMHCI Volume 7, Issue CSCW2

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. algorithm auditing
  2. algorithmic fairness
  3. online advertising

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)881
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)86
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)From Transparency to Accountability and Back: A Discussion of Access and Evidence in AI AuditingProceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization10.1145/3689904.3694711(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Lower Quantity, Higher Quality: Auditing News Content and User Perceptions on Twitter/X Algorithmic versus Chronological TimelinesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870468:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad TargetingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869178:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Improving Group Fairness Assessments with ProxiesACM Journal on Responsible Computing10.1145/36771751:4(1-21)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Granting Non-AI Experts Creative Control Over AI SystemsAdjunct Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3672539.3686714(1-5)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Auditing for Racial Discrimination in the Delivery of Education AdsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3659041(2348-2361)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Auditing GPT's Content Moderation Guardrails: Can ChatGPT Write Your Favorite TV Show?Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658932(660-686)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Youth as Peer Auditors: Engaging Teenagers with Algorithm Auditing of Machine Learning ApplicationsProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655752(560-573)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Human-Centered Evaluation and Auditing of Language ModelsExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636302(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)AI auditing: The Broken Bus on the Road to AI Accountability2024 IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML)10.1109/SaTML59370.2024.00037(612-643)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media