Cited By
View all- Rizvi AHuang TEsrefoglu RHeidemann J(2024)Anycast Polarization in the WildPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-031-56252-5_6(104-131)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
Enabling Multi-hop ISP-Hypergiant Collaboration
Authors: 
Cristian Munteanu, 
Oliver Gasser, Ingmar Poese, 
Georgios Smaragdakis, Anja FeldmannAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 54 - 59
Abstract
Today, there is an increasing number of peering agreements between Hypergiants and networks that benefit millions of end-user. However, the majority of Autonomous Systems do not currently enjoy the benefit of interconnecting directly with Hypergiants to optimally select the path for delivering Hypergiant traffic to their users.
In this paper, we develop and evaluate an architecture that can help this long tail of networks. With our proposed architecture, a network establishes an out-of-band communication channel with Hypergiants that can be two or more AS hops away and, optionally, with the transit provider. This channel enables the exchange of network information to better assign requests of end-users to appropriate Hypergiant servers. Our analysis using operational data shows that our architecture can optimize, on average, 15% of Hypergiants' traffic and 11% of the overall traffic of networks that do not interconnect with Hypergiants. The gains are even higher during peak hours when available capacity can be scarce, up to 46% for some Hypergiants.
References
[1]
R. Al-Dalky, M. Rabinovich, and K. Schomp. 2019. A Look at the ECS Behavior of DNS Resolvers. In ACM IMC.
[2]
R. Alimi, R. Penno, and Y. Yang. 2011. ALTO Protocol. IETF RFC 7285. (2011).
[3]
T. Arnold, J. He, W. Jiang, M. Calder, I. Cunha, V. Giotsas, and E. Katz-Bassett. 2020. Cloud Provider Connectivity in the Flat Internet. In ACM IMC.
[4]
T. Böttger, F. Cuadrado, and S. Uhlig. 2018. Looking for Hypergiants in PeeringDB. ACM CCR 48, 3 (2018).
[5]
M. Calder, X. Fan, and L. Zhu. 2019. A Cloud Provider's View of EDNS Client-Subnet Adoption. In Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA).
[6]
I. Castro, J. C. Cardona, S. Gorinsky, and P. Francois. 2014. Remote Peering: More Peering without Internet Flattening. (2014).
[7]
N. Chatzis, G. Smaragdakis, J. Boettger, T. Krenc, and A. Feldmann. 2013. On the benefits of using a large IXP as an Internet vantage point. In ACM IMC.
[8]
Cloudflare. 2022. Project Myriagon: Cloudflare Passes 10,000 Connected Networks. https://blog.cloudflare.com/10000-networks-and-beyond/. (2022).
[9]
A. Feldmann, O. Gasser, F. Lichtblau, E. Pujol, I. Poese, C. Dietzel, D. Wagner, M. Wichtlhuber, J. Tapiador, N. Vallina-Rodriguez, O. Hohlfeld, and G. Smaragdakis. 2021. A Year in Lockdown: How the Waves of COVID-19 Impact Internet Traffic. Communications of the ACM 64, 7 (July 2021).
[10]
P. Gigis, M. Calder, L. Manassakis, G. Nomikos, V. Kotronis, X. Dimitropoulos, E. Katz-Bassett, and G. Smaragdakis. 2021. Seven Years in the Life of Hypergiants' Off-Nets. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM.
[11]
V. Giotsas, G. Nomikos, V. Kotronis, P. Sermpezis, P. Gigis, L. Manassakis, C. Dietzel, S. Konstantaras, and X. Dimitropoulos. 2021. O Peer, Where Art Thou? Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 29, 1 (2021).
[12]
U. Goel, M. P. Wittie, and M. Steiner. 2015. Faster Web through Client-Assisted CDN Server Selection. In 24th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN).
[13]
Google. 2022. Google Peering Technical Requirements. (2022). https://peering.google.com/#/options/peering
[14]
A. Kountouras, P. Kintis, A. Avgetidis, T. Papastergiou, C. Lever, M. Polychronakis, and M. Antonakakis. 2021. Understanding the Growth and Security Considerations of ECS. In NDSS.
[15]
M. Kwon, Z. Dou, W. Heinzelman, T. Soyata, H. Ba, and J. Shi. 2014. Use of Network Latency Profiling and Redundancy for Cloud Server Selection. In IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing.
[16]
C. Labovitz, S. Lekel-Johnson, D. McPherson, J. Oberheide, and F. Jahanian. 2010. Internet Inter-Domain Traffic. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM.
[17]
G. Moura C. M., S. Castro, W. Hardaker, M. Wullink, and C. Hesselman. 2020. Clouding up the Internet: how centralized is DNS traffic becoming?. In ACM IMC.
[18]
E. Pujol, I. Poese, J. Zerwas, G. Smaragdakis, and A. Feldmann. 2019. Steering Hyper-Giants' Traffic at Scale. In Proc. ACM CoNEXT.
[19]
P. Richter, G. Smaragdakis, A. Feldmann, N. Chatzis, J. Boettger, and W. Willinger. 2014. Peering at Peerings: On the Role of IXP Route Servers. In ACM IMC.
[20]
B. Schlinker, H. Kim, T. Cui, E. Katz-Bassett, H. V. Madhyastha, I. Cunha, J. Quinn, S. Hasan, P. Lapukhov, and H. Zeng. 2017. Engineering Egress with Edge Fabric: Steering Oceans of Content to the World. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2017. 418--431.
[21]
K. Schomp, T. Callahan, M. Rabinovich, and M. Allman. 2013. On Measuring the Client-Side DNS Infrastructure. In ACM IMC.
[22]
Y. Shavitt and N. Zilberman. 2011. A Geolocation Databases Study. (2011).
[23]
F. Streibelt, J. Boettger, N. Chatzis, G. Smaragdakis, and A. Feldmann. 2013. Exploring EDNS-Client-Subnet Adopters in your Free Time. In ACM IMC 2013. 305--312.
[24]
M. Trevisan, D. Giordano, I. Drago, M. M. Munafo, and M. Mellia. 2018. Five Years at the Edge: Watching Internet from the ISP Network. In Proc. ACM CoNEXT.
[25]
H. Xie, Y. R. Yang, A. Krishnamurthy, Y. G. Liu, and A. Silberschatz. 2008. P4P: Provider Portal for Applications. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM.
[26]
K-K. Yap, M. Motiwala, J. Rahe, S. Padgett, M. Holliman, G. Baldus, M. Hines, T. Kim, A. Narayanan, A. Jain, V. Lin, C. Rice, B. Rogan, A. Singh, B. Tanaka, M. Verma, P. Sood, M. Tariq, M. Tierney, D. Trumic, V. Valancius, C. Ying, M. Kallahalla, B. Koley, and A. Vahdat. 2017. Taking the Edge off with Espresso: Scale, Reliability and Programmability for Global Internet Peering. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2017. 432--445.
Index Terms
- Enabling Multi-hop ISP-Hypergiant Collaboration
Recommendations
Pushing CDN-ISP collaboration to the limit
Today a spectrum of solutions are available for istributing content over the Internet, ranging from commercial CDNs to ISP-operated CDNs to content-provider-operated CDNs to peer-to-peer CDNs. Some deploy servers in just a few large data centers while ...
Software-Defined Multicast for Over-the-Top and Overlay-based Live Streaming in ISP Networks
The increasing amount of over-the-top (OTT) live streams and the lack of global network layer multicast support poses challenges for a scalable and efficient streaming over the Internet. Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) help by delivering the streams to ...
A cooperative content delivery scheme for multimedia services in contents delivery networks
ICUIMC '08: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Ubiquitous information management and communicationContents Delivery Networks (CDNs) have been introduced to deliver efficiently very large content to user with low cost. For this, various content delivery schemes such as the uncooperative pull-based scheme, the cooperative push-based scheme, and the ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2023
62 pages
ISBN:9798400702747
DOI:10.1145/3606464
Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
- Internet Society: Internet Society
- SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
In-Cooperation
- IRTF: Internet Research Task Force
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 22 July 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
ANRW '23
Sponsor:
- Internet Society
- SIGCOMM
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 34 of 58 submissions, 59%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 180Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)128
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 02 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Rizvi AHuang TEsrefoglu RHeidemann J(2024)Anycast Polarization in the WildPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-031-56252-5_6(104-131)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in