Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3605390.3605414acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschitalyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

To err is AI

Published: 20 September 2023 Publication History

Abstract

In this work, we analyze the different contexts in which one chooses to integrate artificial intelligence into an interface and the implications of this choice in managing user interaction. While AI in systems can provide significant benefits, it is not infallible and can make errors that seriously affect users. We aim to understand how to design more robust human-AI systems so that these initial AI errors do not lead to more catastrophic failures. To prevent failures, it is essential to detect errors as early as possible and have clear mechanisms to repair them. However, detecting errors in AI systems can be challenging. Therefore, we examine various approaches to error detection and repair, including post-hoc estimation, the use of traces and ambiguity, and multiple sensor layers.

References

[1]
Enrico Bassetti, Andrea Berti, Alba Bisante, Andrea Magnante, and Emanuele Panizzi. 2022. Exploiting User Behavior to Predict Parking Availability through Machine Learning. Smart Cities 5, 4 (2022), 1243–1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5040064
[2]
Enrico Bassetti, Alessio Luciani, and Emanuele Panizzi. 2021. ML Classification of Car Parking with Implicit Interaction on the Driver’s Smartphone. 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85613-7_21
[3]
Alba Bisante, Venkata Srikanth Varma Datla, Stefano Zeppieri, and Emanuele Panizzi. 2022. Implicit Interaction Approach for Car-Related Tasks On Smartphone Applications - A Demo. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Frascati, Rome, Italy) (AVI 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 78, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531073.3534465
[4]
Alba Bisante, Emanuele Panizzi, and Stefano Zeppieri. 2022. Implicit Interaction Approach for Car-Related Tasks On Smartphone Applications. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Frascati, Rome, Italy) (AVI 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 39, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531073.3531173
[5]
Stephen A Brewster, Peter C Wright, Alan J Dix, and Alistair DN Edwards. 1995. The sonic enhancement of graphical buttons. Human—Computer Interaction: Interact’95 (1995), 43–48.
[6]
M. Chalmers, I. MacColl, and M. Bell. 2003. Seamful design: showing the seams in wearable computing. In 2003 IEE Eurowearable. 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1049/ic:20030140
[7]
Allen Cypher. 2000. Eager: Programming Repetitive Tasks By Example. Proceedings of CHI’91 (04 2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108850
[8]
Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat. 2008. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. Commun. ACM 51, 1 (jan 2008), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/1327452.1327492
[9]
Alan Dix. 2017. Activity modelling for low-intention interaction. In The Handbook of Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 183–210.
[10]
Alan Dix, Russell Beale, and Andy Wood. 2000. Architectures to make simple visualisations using simple systems. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. 51–60.
[11]
Marina Dodigovic. 2007. Artificial Intelligence and Second Language Learning: An Efficient Approach to Error Remediation. Language Awareness - LANG AWARE 16 (05 2007), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.2167/la416.0
[12]
David Frohlich, Paul Drew, and Andrew Monk. 1994. Management of repair in human-computer interaction. Human–Computer Interaction 9, 3-4 (1994), 385–425.
[13]
Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Heuristic Evaluation. In Usability Inspection Methods, J. Nielsen and RL Mack (Eds.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chapter 2.
[14]
Donald A Norman. 1988. The psychology of everyday things. Basic books.
[15]
Emanuele Panizzi and Alba Bisante. 2022. Private or Public Parking Type Classifier on the Driver’s Smartphone. Procedia Computer Science 198 (2022), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.233 12th International Conference on Emerging Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks / 11th International Conference on Current and Future Trends of Information and Communication Technologies in Healthcare.
[16]
R. Parasuraman, T.B. Sheridan, and C.D. Wickens. 2000. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 30, 3 (2000), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354
[17]
Stephen Russell, Ira S. Moskowitz, and Adrienne Raglin. 2017. Human Information Interaction, Artificial Intelligence, and Errors. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 71–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59719-5_4
[18]
SAE International. 2018. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. SAE international 4970, 724 (2018), 1–5.
[19]
SAE International. 2021. SAE Levels of Driving AutomationTM Refined for Clarity and International Audience. SAE Blog, posted: Monday, May 3, 2021, https://www.sae.org/blog/sae-j3016-update.
[20]
Ben Shneiderman. 2022. Human-centered AI. Oxford University Press.
[21]
Ben Shneiderman, Catherine Plaisant, Maxine S Cohen, Steven Jacobs, Niklas Elmqvist, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2016. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. To err is AI
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CHItaly '23: Proceedings of the 15th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter
    September 2023
    416 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 September 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. AI
    2. HCI
    3. error detection
    4. error repair
    5. errors
    6. failures
    7. interaction design
    8. user perception

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CHItaly 2023

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 109 of 242 submissions, 45%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 318
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)293
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)46
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media