Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3687272.3690871acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

The Interactive Process Modeller: A Tool for Modelling Inter-Agent Relationships in an Interactive System

Published: 24 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

As more AI agents are embedded in the interactive systems of daily life, it becomes increasingly important to support both users and designers in their reasoning about how those systems work. These improved capacities can lead to both more efficient design decisions and more effective usage of such systems. In this paper, we introduce a novel software application for modelling complex interactive systems, where the capabilities and constraints of both AI and human agents are a primary focus of each model. The software provides tools to help users build, explore, and share models, which affords opportunities for both education and analysis.

References

[1]
Abdurrahman Alshareef, Doohwan Kim, Chungman Seo, and Bernard P. Zeigler. 2020. Activity diagrams between devs-based modeling & simulation and fuml-based model execution. In Proceedings of the 2020 Summer Simulation Conference (Virtual Event, Spain) (SummerSim ’20). Society for Computer Simulation International, San Diego, CA, USA, Article 32, 12 pages.
[2]
Omran Ayoub, Sebastian Troia, Davide Andreoletti, Andrea Bianco, Massimo Tornatore, Silvia Giordano, and Cristina Rottondi. 2022. Towards explainable artificial intelligence in optical networks: The use case of lightpath QOT estimation. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking 15, 1 (Nov 2022). https://doi.org/10.1364/jocn.470812
[3]
John Joon Young Chung, Shiqing He, and Eytan Adar. 2022. Artist Support Networks: Implications for Future Creativity Support Tools. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533505
[4]
Christopher Dragert, Jörg Kienzle, and Clark Verbrugge. 2011. Toward high-level reuse of statechart-based AI in computer games. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Games and Software Engineering (Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA) (GAS ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1984674.1984684
[5]
Electronic Arts. 2009. The Sims 3. www.ea.com/games/the-sims/the-sims-3.
[6]
Richard Evans. 2010. Modeling Individual Personalities in The Sims 3. www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVMs5_B611E. Game Developers Conference, 2010.
[7]
Daniel Friesel and Olaf Spinczyk. 2022. Black-box models for non-functional properties of AI software systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on AI Engineering: Software Engineering for AI (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) (CAIN ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3522664.3528602
[8]
Anirban I. Ghosh, Radhika Sharma, Karan Goyal, Balakarthikeyan Rajan, and Senthil Mani. 2023. Health Assurance: AI Model Monitoring Platform. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI-ML Systems (Bangalore, India) (AIMLSystems ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 21, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3564121.3564798
[9]
Steffen Holter and Mennatallah El-Assady. 2024. Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation. Computer Graphics forum 43, 3 (2024).
[10]
Naia Kamawar-MacLeod and David Thue. 2024. Capabilities and Constraints: Modelling what Human and AI Agents Can and Can’t Change. In International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI ’24), November 24–27, 2024, Swansea, United Kingdom. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3687272.3690902
[11]
Christian Kästner and Eunsuk Kang. 2020. Teaching software engineering for AI-enabled systems. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (Seoul, South Korea) (ICSE-SEET ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377814.3381714
[12]
Markus Langer, Daniel Oster, Timo Speith, Holger Hermanns, Lena Kästner, Eva Schmidt, Andreas Sesing, and Kevin Baum. 2021. What do we want from Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? – a stakeholder perspective on xai and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research. Artificial Intelligence 296 (Jul 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103473
[13]
Duri Long and Brian Magerko. 2020. What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
[14]
Duri Long, Sophie Rollins, Jasmin Ali-Diaz, Katherine Hancock, Samnang Nuonsinoeun, Jessica Roberts, and Brian Magerko. 2023. Fostering AI Literacy with Embodiment & Creativity: From Activity Boxes to Museum Exhibits. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (Chicago, IL, USA) (IDC ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 727–731. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585088.3594495
[15]
Prashan Madumal, Tim Miller, Liz Sonenberg, and Frank Vetere. 2019. A Grounded Interaction Protocol for Explainable Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (AAMAS ’19). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1033–1041.
[16]
Jane Southworth, Kati Migliaccio, Joe Glover, Ja’Net Glover, David Reed, Christopher McCarty, Joel Brendemuhl, and Aaron Thomas. 2023. Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 4 (2023), 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
[17]
David Thue. 2020. What Might an Action do? Toward a Grounded View of Actions in Interactive Storytelling. In Interactive Storytelling, Anne-Gwenn Bosser, David E. Millard, and Charlie Hargood (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62516-0_19
[18]
David Thue. 2021. Supporting the Design of Flexible Game Systems. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Virtual Event, Austria) (CHI PLAY ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450337.3484223

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Capabilities and Constraints: Modelling what Human and AI Agents Can and Can't ChangeProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3687272.3690902(417-419)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HAI '24: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
November 2024
502 pages
ISBN:9798400711787
DOI:10.1145/3687272
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 November 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Explainable AI
  2. Interaction Design
  3. Interactive Process Modelling

Qualifiers

  • Poster
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

HAI '24
Sponsor:
HAI '24: International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
November 24 - 27, 2024
Swansea, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 121 of 404 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Capabilities and Constraints: Modelling what Human and AI Agents Can and Can't ChangeProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3687272.3690902(417-419)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media