Who is holding the pen? Annotating collaborative processes
Article No.: 65, Pages 1 - 12
Abstract
Sketchnoting is a form of visual notetaking that we use to com- municate and unpack our design research work in collaborative settings. However, the more we rely on these sketches we find that while they provide clarity, they can also obscure participants’ voices. In order to explore this, we constructed a technique to allow us to look more closely at our own sketchnotes in order to reflect and develop more detailed understandings of what they might reveal and obscure. In this paper, we use this technique to inquire into the multiple voices held in two sketchnotes from past projects. The result is a re-interpretation of these sketchnotes that bring to the foreground multiple and detailed narratives about the distinct voices within them. We propose this technique as a way to consider the knowledge generated through sketchnoting in greater depth, which allows us to better frame our own sketching practices in design research.
References
[1]
SARA AHMED. 2014. Willful Subjects. Duke University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1131d51
[2]
Sabine Ammon. 2019. Drawing Inferences: Thinking with 6B (and Sketching Paper). Philosophy & Technology 32, 4 (Dec 2019), 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0323-51007/s13347-018-0323-5
[3]
Zoy Anastassakis. 2021. DESIGN STRUGGLES: Intersecting Histories, Pedagogies, and Perspectives. Valiz. 169–186 pages.
[4]
Kristina Andersen and Ron Wakkary. 2019. The Magic Machine Workshops: Making Personal Design Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Confer- ence on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300342 https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300342
[5]
Deborah Baff. 2020. Using Sketchnotes in PhD Research and Academic Practice. International Journal of Management and Applied Research 7, 33 (Aug. 2020), 370–381.
[6]
Karen Barad. 2006. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Duke University Press, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822388128
[7]
Karen Barad. 2010. Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of In- heritance: Dis/Continuities, Spacetime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come. Derrida Today 3, 2 (2010), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2010.0206
[8]
Eli Blevis. 2014. Stillness and Motion, Meaning and Form. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2602963
[9]
Eli Blevis, Elizabeth Churchill, William Odom, James Pierce, David Roedl, and Ron Wakkary. 2012. Visual Thinking & Digital Imagery. In CHI ’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI EA ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2715–2718. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212703
[10]
Eli Blevis, Sabrina Hauser, and William Odom. 2015. Sharing the Hidden Treasure in Pictorials. Interactions 22, 3 (apr 2015), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/2755534
[11]
Mark Blythe, Peter Wright, John Bowers, Andy Boucher, Nadine Jarvis, Phil Reynolds, and Bill Gaver. 2010. Age and Experience: Ludic Engagement in a Residential Care Setting. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark) (DIS ’10). Association for Computing Ma- chinery, New York, NY, USA, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858200
[12]
carla boserman. 2022. Dibujo en contexto- otros laboratorios, pequeñas cosinas y un rebaño. Una aproximación al dibujo etnográficvo desde el arte, lo político y lo colectivo .pdf. Ph. D. Dissertation. Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya. Departament de Didàctica de les Arts i de les Ciències. BAU. Centre Universitari de Disseny de Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/673588
[13]
John Bowers. 2012. The Logic of Annotated Portfolios: Communicating the Value of ’Research through Design’. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.23179682317956.2317968
[14]
Pablo Calderon Salazar and Liesbeth Huybrechts. 2020. PD Otherwise Will Be Pluriversal (or It Won't Be). In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1 (Manizales, Colombia) (PDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385027
[15]
Mariolga Reyes Cruz. 2008. What If I Just Cite Graciela? Working To- ward Decolonizing Knowledge Through a Critical Ethnography. Qualita- tive Inquiry 14, 4 (2008), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408314346 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408314346
[16]
Bruna Goveia da Rocha, Oscar Tomicoand Daniel Tetteroo, Kristina Ander- sen, and Panos Markopoulos. 2021. Embroidered Inflatables: Exploring Sam- ple Making in Research through Design. Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice 9, 1 (2021), 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2021.1885586 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2021.1885586
[17]
Jara Dean-Coffey. 2013. Graphic Recording. New Directions for Evaluation 2013, 140 (2013), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20073 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ev.20073
[18]
Jara Dean-Coffey. 2013. Graphic Recording. New Directions for Evaluation 2013, 140 (Dec. 2013), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20073
[19]
Audrey Desjardins and Cayla Key. 2020. Parallels, Tangents, and Loops: Re- flections on the ’Through’ Part of RtD. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM De- signing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2133–2147. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395586 https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395586
[20]
Audrey Desjardins, Cayla Key, Heidi R. Biggs, and Kelsey Aschenbeck. 2019. Bespoke Booklets: A Method for Situated Co-Speculation. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 697–709. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322311 https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322311
[21]
Audrey Desjardins, Oscar Tomico, Andrés Lucero, Marta E. Cecchinato, and Carman Neustaedter. 2021. Introduction to the Special Issue on First-Person Methods in HCI. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 28, 6, Article 37 (dec 2021), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492342
[22]
Laura Devendorf, Kristina Andersen, and Aisling Kelliher. 2020. Making Design Memoirs: Understanding and Honoring Difficult Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376345
[23]
Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren Klein. 2020. Our Values and Our Metrics for Hold- ing Ourselves Accountable. https://data-feminism.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/3hxh4l8o.
[24]
Robert Dimeo. 2016. Sketchnoting: an analog skill in the digital age. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 46, 3 (Dec. 2016), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024949.30249513024951
[25]
Rob Dimeo. 2021. Sketchnoting science: how to make sketchnotes from technical content. Number NIST SP 1265. Gaithersburg, MD. NIST SP 1265 pages. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1265 https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1265
[26]
Thomas Dylan, Mark Blythe, Jayne Wallace, James Thomas, and Tim Regan. 2016. RtD Comics: A Medium for Representing Research Through Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 971–982. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901821
[27]
Marina Fernández Camporro and Nicolai Marquardt. 2020. Live Sketchnot- ing Across Platforms: Exploring the Potential and Limitations of Analogue and Digital Tools. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Com- puting Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machin- ery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376192
[28]
Almudena Fernández-Fontecha, Kay L O'Halloran, Sabine Tan, and Peter Wignell. 2019. A multimodal approach to visual thinking: the scientific sketchnote. Visual Communication 18, 1 (2019), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218759808 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218759808
[29]
James Franz. 2023. ”Sketch and Talk”, Drawing lines between incarcerated humans, the interior, and “stuff”. Design methodologies for (well)-being in prisons, youth homes and psychiatric hospitals. Ph. D. Dissertation. HDK-Valand – Academy of Art and Design, University of Gothenburg. https://hdl.handle.net/2077/76386
[30]
Mikhaila Friske, Jordan Wirfs-Brock, and Laura Devendorf. 2020. Entangling the Roles of Maker and Interpreter in Interpersonal Data Narratives: Explorations in Yarn and Sound. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Ma- chinery, New York, NY, USA, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395442
[31]
Mafalda Gamboa. 2022. Conversations with Myself: Sketching Workshop Experi- ences in Design Epistemology. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Venice, Italy) (C&C ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3531450
[32]
Mafalda Gamboa, Sara Ljungblad, and Miriam Sturdee. 2023. Conversational Composites: A Method for Illustration Layering. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (War- saw, Poland) (TEI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3569009.3572793
[33]
Mafalda Gamboa, Claudia Núñez Pacheco, Sarah Homewood, Andrés Lucero, Janne Mascha Beuthel, Audrey Desjardins, Karey Helms, William Gaver, Kristina Höök, and Laura Forlano. 2024. More Samples of One: Weaving First-Person Perspectives into Mainstream HCI Research. In Companion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark) (DIS ’24 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 364–367. https://doi.org/10.1145/3656156.3658382
[34]
Bill Gaver and John Bowers. 2012. Annotated portfolios. Interactions 19, 4 (Jul 2012), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212889
[35]
William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 937–946. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538
[36]
Gabriela Goldschmidt. 1994. On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies 15, 2 (1994), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)90022-11
[37]
Gabriela Goldschmidt. 2003. The Backtalk of Self-Generated Sketches. Design Issues 19, 11 (Jan. 2003), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793603762667728
[38]
Bruna Goveia da Rocha, Kristina Andersen, and Oscar Tomico. 2022. Portfolio of Loose Ends. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Confer- ence (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533516
[39]
Saidiya V Hartman. 2008. Venus in Two Acts. Small Axe 12, 26 (2008), 1–14. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/241115
[40]
Saidiya V Hartman. 2021. Saidiya Hartman. Gallery 214: Critical Fabulations. 2021. https://www.moma.org/audio/playlist/298/4088
[41]
Sabrina Hauser, Doenja Oogjes, Ron Wakkary, and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2018. An Annotated Portfolio on Doing Postphenomenology Through Research Products. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196745
[42]
Euijin Hwang, Reuben Kirkham, Kevin Marshall, Ahmed Kharrufa, and Patrick Olivier. 2022. Sketching dialogue: incorporating sketching in empathetic semi- Structured interviews for human-computer interaction research. Behaviour & Information Technology (Aug. 2022), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.21134312022.2113431
[43]
Franz James and Sepideh Olausson. 2018. Designing for care: employing ethno- graphic design methods at special care homes for young offenders – a pilot study. Design for Health 2, 1 (2018), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2018.14567831456783 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2018.1456783
[44]
Nadine Jarvis, David Cameron, and Andy Boucher. 2012. Attention to Detail: Annotations of a Design Process. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (Copenhagen, Denmark) (NordiCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399019
[45]
Grada kilomba. 2020. Plantation memories: Episodes of everyday racism. UNRAST- Verlag.
[46]
Nantia Koulidou, Jayne Wallace, Miriam Sturdee, and Abigail Durrant. 2020. Drawing on Experiences of Self: Dialogical Sketching. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395513
[47]
Makayla Lewis and Miriam Sturdee. 2022. Curricula Design & Pedagogy for Sketching Within HCI & UX Education. Frontiers in Computer Science 4 (1 April 2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.826445
[48]
Makayla Lewis, Miriam Sturdee, John Miers, Josh Urban Davis, and Thuong Hoang. 2022. Exploring AltNarrative in HCI Imagery and Comics. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3516394
[49]
Andrés Lucero, Audrey Desjardins, Carman Neustaedter, Kristina Höök, Marc Hassenzahl, and Marta E. Cecchinato. 2019. A Sample of One: First-Person Re- search Methods in HCI. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Inter- active Systems Conference 2019 Companion (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19 Compan- ion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 385–388. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3319996
[50]
Maria Lugones. 2010. Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia 25, 4 (2010), 742–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.xarXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x
[51]
Nicolai Marquardt and Saul Greenberg. 2012. Sketchnotes for Visual Thinking in HCI.Workshop on Visual Thinking and Digital Imagery. In Proceedings ACM Con- ference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
[52]
Penelope Mendonça. 2016. Graphic facilitation, sketchnoting, journalism and ‘The Doodle Revolution’: New dimensions in comics scholarship. Studies in Comics 7, 1 (July 2016), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1386/stic.7.1.127_1
[53]
Claudia Núñez Pacheco, Janne Mascha Beuthel, Rachael Garrett, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, and Nantia Koulidou. 2024. Designing [Im]Material Inventories of Nomadic Belongings. In Companion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark) (DIS ’24 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 401–404. https://doi.org/10.1145/3656156.3658380 https://doi.org/10.1145/3656156.3658380
[54]
Hope A. Olson. 2008. How We Construct Subjects: A Feminist Analysis. Library Trends 56, 2 (2008), 509–541. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2008.0007
[55]
Verena Paepcke-Hjeltness, Mani Mina, and Aziza Cyamani. 2017. Sketchnoting: A new approach to developing visual communication ability, improving critical thinking and creative confidence for engineering and design students. In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, Indianapolis, IN, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190659 https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190659
[56]
Luiza Prado de O. Martins and Pedro J. S. Vieira de Oliveira. 2017. Impossible Methods. A decolonising view on design research and map- ping. https://nieuweinstituut.nl/en/events/impossible-methods-decolonising- view-design-research-and-mapping [Accessed 24-08-2023].
[57]
Mike Rohde. 2013. The Sketchnote Handbook: The illustrated guide to visual notetaking. Peachpit Press.
[58]
Daniela Rosner. 2018. Critical Fabulations: Reworking the Methods and Margins of Design. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11035.001.0001
[59]
Daniela Rosner. 2023. Fabulating Otherwise. Interactions 30, 2 (feb 2023), 34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582194
[60]
Niek Rutten, Jef Rouschop, Louise Mathiasen, Oscar Tomico, Bruna Goveia Da Rocha, and Kristina Andersen. 2022. Flipping Pages: Exploring Physi- cal Workbooks as Reflective Method for Documentation. In Nordic Human- Computer Interaction Conference (Aarhus, Denmark) (NordiCHI ’22). Associ- ation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 90, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546155.3547296
[61]
Zoë Sadokierski. 2020. Developing critical documentation practices for design researchers. Design Studies 69 (2020), 100940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.03.002
[62]
2020.03.002
[63]
Mariella Schembri, Philip Farrugia, Andrew J. Wodehouse, Hilary Grierson, and Ahmed Kovacevic. 2015. Influence of sketch types on distributed design team work. CoDesign 11, 2 (2015), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.10548411054841 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1054841
[64]
Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Nadia Campo Woytuk, Noura Howell, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Karey Helms, Tom Jenkins, and Pedro Sanches. 2023. Fabulation as an Approach for Design Futuring. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (DIS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1693–1709. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596097 3563657.3596097
[65]
Angelika Strohmayer and Michael Muller. 2023. Data-ing and Un-Data-ing. Interactions 30, 3 (may 2023), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3587240
[66]
Miriam Sturdee and Makayla Lewis. 2020. Sketching in HCI: Research Prac- tice & Publication (Advanced). In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Confer- ence on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375047 https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375047
[67]
Miriam Sturdee, Makayla Lewis, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2018. SketchBlog #1: the rise and rise of the sketchnote. Interactions 25, 6 (oct 2018), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3281661 https://doi.org/10.1145/3281661
[68]
Miriam Sturdee and Joseph Lindley. 2019. Sketching & Drawing as Future Inquiry in HCI. In Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019 (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (HTTF 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363402
[69]
Miriam Sturdee, Sarah Robinson, and Conor Linehan. 2020. Research Jour- neys: Making the Invisible, Visual. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Design- ing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Asso- ciation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2163–2175. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395590 https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395590
[70]
Miriam Amber Sturdee. 2018. Sketching as a support mechanism for the design and development of shape-changing interfaces. Ph. D. Dissertation. Lancaster Uni- versity. http://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/sketching-as-a-support-mechanism-for-the-design-and-development-of-shapechanging-interfaces(d49e963a-41b7-4825-8bc1-55d4fff18c48).html
[71]
Lynne Chapman Sue Heath and The Morgan Centre Sketchers. 2018. Observa- tional sketching as method. International Journal of Social Research Method- ology 21, 6 (2018), 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1484990 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1484990
[72]
Barbara Tversky. [n. d.]. What do Sketches say about Thinking? ([n. d.]), 4.
[73]
Barbara Tversky. 1999. What does drawing reveal about thinking? In J. Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design (01 1999).
[74]
Barbara Tversky and M Suwa. 2009. Chapter 4 Thinking with Sketches. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381634.003.0004.
[75]
Jayne Wallace, Jon Rogers, Joanna Foster, Sean Kingsley, Nantia Koulidou, Erika Shorter, Mike Shorter, and Natasha Trotman. 2017. Scribing as Seen from the Inside: The Ethos of the Studio. Design Issues 33, 3 (July 2017), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00454 https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00454
[76]
Amy L. Wright, Michelle L. Butt, Vicky Miller, Brenda Jacobs, and Era Mae Ferron. 2023. The Use of Graphic Facilitation to Support Adherence to OCAP® Principles in Research With Indigenous Communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 22 (Jan. 2023), 16094069231190557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406923119055716094069231190557
[77]
Paulina Yurman. 2021. Fluid Speculations: Drawing Artefacts in Watercolour as Experimentation in Research Through Design. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Virtual Event, Italy) (C&C ’21). Asso- ciation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 38, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3466777
[78]
Paulina Yurman, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, James Pierce, Nadia Campo Woy- tuk, Anuradha Venugopal Reddy, and Matt Malpass. 2022. Venetian Drawing Conversations. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Venice, Italy) (C&C ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3531207
[79]
Rebecca Zheng, Marina Fernández Camporro, Hugo Romat, Nathalie Henry Riche, Benjamin Bach, Fanny Chevalier, Ken Hinckley, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2021. Sketchnote Components, Design Space Dimensions, and Strategies for Effec- tive Visual Note Taking. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Hu- man Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machin- ery, New York, NY, USA, Article 466, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.34455083445508
[80]
Mimi Onuoha. 2016. The Library of Missing Datasets (2016). https://mimionuoha.com/the-library-of-missing-datasets
[81]
Mimi Onuoha. 202015. On Missing Data Sets. https://github.com/MimiOnuoha/missing-datasets
Index Terms
- Who is holding the pen? Annotating collaborative processes
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Design strategies and methods in interaction design: the past, present, and future
CHI EA '97: CHI '97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe complexity of user interface design demands well-chosen strategies and methods to optimize the design process. This two day workshop is designed to provide the understanding and application of design strategies and methods [DS&M] for the development ...
Dynamics of research through design
DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceIn this paper, we investigate Research through Design at a micro-level, by addressing the dynamic interplay of research and design as they unfold throughout a design process. As our principal case, we consider the design of a three-dimensional ...
A Collaborative Landscaping Exercise of IoT Design Methods
OzCHI '19: Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-InteractionWe brought together the creators of seven Internet of Things design methods for a collaborative landscaping exercise of these design methods. Together, the creators tried out all of these IoT design methods and located them on a design process model. A ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2024
1236 pages
ISBN:9798400709661
DOI:10.1145/3679318
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 13 October 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
NordiCHI 2024
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 72Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)72
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)72
Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in