Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3678957.3685738acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Stressor Type Matters! --- Exploring Factors Influencing Cross-Dataset Generalizability of Physiological Stress Detection

Published: 04 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Automatic stress detection using heart rate variability (HRV) features has gained significant traction as it utilizes unobtrusive wearable sensors measuring signals like electrocardiogram (ECG) or blood volume pulse (BVP). However, detecting stress through such physiological signals presents a considerable challenge owing to the variations in recorded signals influenced by factors, such as perceived stress intensity and measurement devices. Consequently, stress detection models developed on one dataset may perform poorly on unseen data collected under different conditions. To address this challenge, this study explores the generalizability of machine learning models trained on HRV features for binary stress detection. Our goal extends beyond evaluating generalization performance; we aim to identify the characteristics of datasets that have the most significant influence on generalizability. We leverage four publicly available stress datasets (WESAD, SWELL-KW, ForDigitStress, VerBIO) that vary in at least one of the characteristics such as stress elicitation techniques, stress intensity, and sensor devices. Employing a cross-dataset evaluation approach, we explore which of these characteristics strongly influence model generalizability. Our findings reveal a crucial factor affecting model generalizability: primary stressor. Models achieved good performance across datasets when the primary stressor (e.g., social evaluation in our case) remains consistent. Factors like stress intensity or brand of the measurement device had minimal impact on cross-dataset performance. Based on our findings, we recommend matching the primary stressor when deploying HRV-based stress models in new environments. Although previous works have performed cross-dataset evaluation of stress models, this is the first study to systematically investigate the factors influencing the cross-dataset applicability of HRV-based stress models. Our insights are crucial for scenarios with limited data, where techniques like domain generalization and domain adaptation may not be applicable.

References

[1]
Ayten Ozge Akmandor and Niraj K Jha. 2017. Keep the stress away with SoDA: Stress detection and alleviation system. IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems 3, 4 (2017), 269–282.
[2]
Mariano Albaladejo-González, José A Ruipérez-Valiente, and Félix Gómez Mármol. 2023. Evaluating different configurations of machine learning models and their transfer learning capabilities for stress detection using heart rate. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 14, 8 (2023), 11011–11021.
[3]
Ane Alberdi, Asier Aztiria, and Adrian Basarab. 2016. Towards an automatic early stress recognition system for office environments based on multimodal measurements: A review. Journal of biomedical informatics 59 (2016), 49–75.
[4]
Karim Assi, Lakmal Meegahapola, William Droz, Peter Kun, Amalia De Götzen, Miriam Bidoglia, Sally Stares, George Gaskell, Altangerel Chagnaa, Amarsanaa Ganbold, 2023. Complex daily activities, country-level diversity, and smartphone sensing: A study in denmark, italy, mongolia, paraguay, and uk. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–23.
[5]
Alice Baird, Andreas Triantafyllopoulos, Sandra Zänkert, Sandra Ottl, Lukas Christ, Lukas Stappen, Julian Konzok, Sarah Sturmbauer, Eva-Maria Meßner, Brigitte M Kudielka, 2021. An evaluation of speech-based recognition of emotional and physiological markers of stress. Frontiers in Computer Science 3 (2021), 750284.
[6]
Luke Balcombe and Diego De Leo. 2022. Human-computer interaction in digital mental health. In Informatics, Vol. 9. MDPI, 14.
[7]
Mouna Benchekroun, Dan Istrate, Vincent Zalc, and Dominique Lenne. 2022. A Multi-Modal Dataset (MMSD) for Acute Stress Bio-Markers. In International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. Springer, 377–392.
[8]
Mouna Benchekroun, Pedro Elkind Velmovitsky, Dan Istrate, Vincent Zalc, Plinio Pelegrini Morita, and Dominique Lenne. 2023. Cross dataset analysis for generalizability of HRV-based stress detection models. Sensors 23, 4 (2023), 1807.
[9]
Javad Birjandtalab, Diana Cogan, Maziyar Baran Pouyan, and Mehrdad Nourani. 2016. A non-EEG biosignals dataset for assessment and visualization of neurological status. In 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (SiPS). IEEE, 110–114.
[10]
Pramod Bobade and M Vani. 2020. Stress detection with machine learning and deep learning using multimodal physiological data. In 2020 Second International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA). IEEE, 51–57.
[11]
Jason J Braithwaite, Derrick G Watson, Robert Jones, and Mickey Rowe. 2013. A guide for analysing electrodermal activity (EDA) & skin conductance responses (SCRs) for psychological experiments. Psychophysiology 49, 1 (2013), 1017–1034.
[12]
Yekta Said Can, Bert Arnrich, and Cem Ersoy. 2019. Stress detection in daily life scenarios using smart phones and wearable sensors: A survey. Journal of biomedical informatics 92 (2019), 103139.
[13]
Mohamed Elgendi, Mirjam Jonkman, and Friso De Boer. 2010. Frequency Bands Effects on QRS Detection.Biosignals 2003 (2010), 2002.
[14]
Mohamed Elgendi, Ian Norton, Matt Brearley, Derek Abbott, and Dale Schuurmans. 2013. Systolic peak detection in acceleration photoplethysmograms measured from emergency responders in tropical conditions. PloS one 8, 10 (2013), e76585.
[15]
Giorgos Giannakakis, Dimitris Grigoriadis, Katerina Giannakaki, Olympia Simantiraki, Alexandros Roniotis, and Manolis Tsiknakis. 2019. Review on psychological stress detection using biosignals. IEEE transactions on affective computing 13, 1 (2019), 440–460.
[16]
Shalom Greene, Himanshu Thapliyal, and Allison Caban-Holt. 2016. A survey of affective computing for stress detection: Evaluating technologies in stress detection for better health. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine 5, 4 (2016), 44–56.
[17]
Rohit Gupta, Amit Bhongade, and Tapan Kumar Gandhi. 2023. Multimodal Wearable Sensors-based Stress and Affective States Prediction Model. In 2023 9th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Vol. 1. IEEE, 30–35.
[18]
Yeaminul Haque, Rahat Shahriar Zawad, Chowdhury Saleh Ahmed Rony, Hasan Al Banna, Tapotosh Ghosh, M Shamim Kaiser, and Mufti Mahmud. 2024. State-of-the-Art of Stress Prediction from Heart Rate Variability Using Artificial Intelligence. Cognitive Computation 16, 2 (2024), 455–481.
[19]
Alexander Heimerl, Pooja Prajod, Silvan Mertes, Tobias Baur, Matthias Kraus, Ailin Liu, Helen Risack, Nicolas Rohleder, Elisabeth André, and Linda Becker. 2023. ForDigitStress: A multi-modal stress dataset employing a digital job interview scenario. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07742 (2023).
[20]
Saskia Koldijk, Mark A Neerincx, and Wessel Kraaij. 2016. Detecting work stress in offices by combining unobtrusive sensors. IEEE Transactions on affective computing 9, 2 (2016), 227–239.
[21]
Saskia Koldijk, Maya Sappelli, Suzan Verberne, Mark A Neerincx, and Wessel Kraaij. 2014. The SWELL knowledge work dataset for stress and user modeling research. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on multimodal interaction. 291–298.
[22]
Alexandros Liapis, Evanthia Faliagka, Christos Katsanos, Christos Antonopoulos, and Nikolaos Voros. 2021. Detection of subtle stress episodes during UX evaluation: Assessing the performance of the WESAD bio-signals dataset. In Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2021: 18th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Bari, Italy, August 30–September 3, 2021, Proceedings, Part III 18. Springer, 238–247.
[23]
Tiffany Luong, Nicolas Martin, Anais Raison, Ferran Argelaguet, Jean-Marc Diverrez, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2020. Towards real-time recognition of users mental workload using integrated physiological sensors into a VR HMD. In 2020 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR). IEEE, 425–437.
[24]
Dominique Makowski, Tam Pham, Zen J Lau, Jan C Brammer, François Lespinasse, Hung Pham, Christopher Schölzel, and SH Annabel Chen. 2021. NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behavior research methods (2021), 1–8.
[25]
Miguel Martinho, Ana Fred, and Hugo Silva. 2018. Towards continuous user recognition by exploring physiological multimodality: An electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood volume pulse (BVP) approach. In 2018 International Symposium in Sensing and Instrumentation in IoT Era (ISSI). IEEE, 1–6.
[26]
Lakmal Meegahapola, William Droz, Peter Kun, Amalia De Götzen, Chaitanya Nutakki, Shyam Diwakar, Salvador Ruiz Correa, Donglei Song, Hao Xu, Miriam Bidoglia, 2023. Generalization and personalization of mobile sensing-based mood inference models: an analysis of college students in eight countries. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies 6, 4 (2023), 1–32.
[27]
Varun Mishra, Sougata Sen, Grace Chen, Tian Hao, Jeffrey Rogers, Ching-Hua Chen, and David Kotz. 2020. Evaluating the reproducibility of physiological stress detection models. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies 4, 4 (2020), 1–29.
[28]
Marta Mondellini, Pooja Prajod, Matteo Lavit Nicora, Mattia Chiappini, Ettore Micheletti, Fabio Alexander Storm, Rocco Vertechy, Elisabeth André, and Matteo Malosio. 2023. Behavioral patterns in robotic collaborative assembly: comparing neurotypical and Autism Spectrum Disorder participants. Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023), 1245857.
[29]
Kizito Nkurikiyeyezu, Anna Yokokubo, and Guillaume Lopez. 2019. The effect of person-specific biometrics in improving generic stress predictive models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01770 (2019).
[30]
Tam Pham, Zen Juen Lau, SH Annabel Chen, and Dominique Makowski. 2021. Heart rate variability in psychology: A review of HRV indices and an analysis tutorial. Sensors 21, 12 (2021), 3998.
[31]
Arvind Pillai, Subigya Kumar Nepal, Weichen Wang, Matthew Nemesure, Michael Heinz, George Price, Damien Lekkas, Amanda C Collins, Tess Griffin, Benjamin Buck, 2024. Investigating Generalizability of Speech-based Suicidal Ideation Detection Using Mobile Phones. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 7, 4 (2024), 1–38.
[32]
Pooja Prajod and Elisabeth André. 2022. On the Generalizability of ECG-based Stress Detection Models. In 2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE, 549–554.
[33]
Pooja Prajod, Tobias Huber, and Elisabeth André. 2022. Using explainable AI to identify differences between clinical and experimental pain detection models based on facial expressions. In International Conference on Multimedia Modeling. Springer, 311–322.
[34]
Pooja Prajod, Matteo Lavit Nicora, Matteo Malosio, and Elisabeth André. 2023. Gaze-based attention recognition for human-robot collaboration. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 140–147.
[35]
Pooja Prajod, Matteo Lavit Nicora, Marta Mondellini, Matteo Meregalli Falerni, Rocco Vertechy, Matteo Malosio, and Elisabeth André. 2024. Flow in human-robot collaboration—multimodal analysis and perceived challenge detection in industrial scenarios. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 11 (2024), 1393795.
[36]
Rita Meziati Sabour, Yannick Benezeth, Pierre De Oliveira, Julien Chappe, and Fan Yang. 2021. Ubfc-phys: A multimodal database for psychophysiological studies of social stress. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 14, 1 (2021), 622–636.
[37]
Pritam Sarkar and Ali Etemad. 2020. Self-supervised ECG representation learning for emotion recognition. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 13, 3 (2020), 1541–1554.
[38]
Philip Schmidt, Attila Reiss, Robert Duerichen, Claus Marberger, and Kristof Van Laerhoven. 2018. Introducing WESAD, a multimodal dataset for wearable stress and affect detection. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction. 400–408.
[39]
Pedro Elkind Velmovitsky, Paulo Alencar, Scott T Leatherdale, Donald Cowan, and Plinio Pelegrini Morita. 2021. Towards real-time public health: a novel mobile health monitoring system. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 6049–6051.
[40]
Gideon Vos, Kelly Trinh, Zoltan Sarnyai, and Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi. 2023. Ensemble machine learning model trained on a new synthesized dataset generalizes well for stress prediction using wearable devices. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 148 (2023), 104556.
[41]
Gideon Vos, Kelly Trinh, Zoltan Sarnyai, and Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi. 2023. Generalizable machine learning for stress monitoring from wearable devices: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 173 (2023), 105026.
[42]
Xuhai Xu, Xin Liu, Han Zhang, Weichen Wang, Subigya Nepal, Yasaman Sefidgar, Woosuk Seo, Kevin S Kuehn, Jeremy F Huckins, Margaret E Morris, 2023. GLOBEM: cross-dataset generalization of longitudinal human behavior modeling. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 4 (2023), 1–34.
[43]
Megha Yadav, Md Nazmus Sakib, Ehsanul Haque Nirjhar, Kexin Feng, Amir H Behzadan, and Theodora Chaspari. 2020. Exploring individual differences of public speaking anxiety in real-life and virtual presentations. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 13, 3 (2020), 1168–1182.
[44]
Bin Yu, Mathias Funk, Jun Hu, Qi Wang, and Loe Feijs. 2018. Biofeedback for everyday stress management: A systematic review. Frontiers in ICT 5 (2018), 23.
[45]
Md Rahat Shahriar Zawad, Chowdhury Saleh Ahmed Rony, Md Yeaminul Haque, Md Hasan Al Banna, Mufti Mahmud, and M Shamim Kaiser. 2023. A Hybrid Approach for Stress Prediction from Heart Rate Variability. In Frontiers of ICT in Healthcare: Proceedings of EAIT 2022. Springer, 111–121.

Index Terms

  1. Stressor Type Matters! --- Exploring Factors Influencing Cross-Dataset Generalizability of Physiological Stress Detection

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICMI '24: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
      November 2024
      725 pages
      ISBN:9798400704628
      DOI:10.1145/3678957
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 04 November 2024

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Cross-dataset
      2. Electrocardiography
      3. Generalizability
      4. Heart rate variability
      5. Machine learning
      6. Photoplethysmography
      7. Stress

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      ICMI '24
      ICMI '24: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION
      November 4 - 8, 2024
      San Jose, Costa Rica

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 453 of 1,080 submissions, 42%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 180
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)180
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)85
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Login options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media