Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3678884.3682054acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract
Free access

Co-Designing Reproductive Justice Futures: Intersectional Care-Activism for Abortion Access

Published: 13 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This dissertation project will integrate Feminist HCI and Reproductive Justice to interrogate how current technologies being used to address gaps in abortion access risk perpetuating reproductive oppression, and co-design supports for inclusive abortion access. My research looks at how the current "crisis of care" in abortion access resulting from the 2022 Dobbs decision is responsibilizing technologies and putting unsustainable demand on Abortion Access Organizations while not addressing underlying systemic barriers to abortion access which were in effect prior to 2022. My project focuses on Illinois, USA, where many abortion seekers are traveling to access their care. I use qualitative methods and design as research to explore how AAOs are currently using technologies, how extant abortion technologies are leaving out particular user groups, and how design can work towards Reproductive Justice futures.

References

[1]
Teresa Almeida, Rob Comber, and Madeline Balaam. 2016. HCI and Intimate Care as an Agenda for Change in Women's Health. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2599--2611.
[2]
Dana Ayotte, Cheryl Li, Sepideh Shahi, Titania Veda, Colin Clark, and Gloria Bernal. 2024. Community-led co-design kit. https://co-design.inclusivedesign.ca/
[3]
Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Ed Jenkins, Selina Sutton, and Andrew Garbett. 2015. FeedFinder: A location-mapping mobile application for breastfeeding women. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1709--1718.
[4]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1301--1310.
[5]
Nadia Campo Woytuk, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Marianela Ciolfi Felice, and Madeline Balaam. 2020. Touching and being in touch with the menstruating body. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[6]
Marianela Ciolfi Felice, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, and Madeline Balaam. 2021. Resisting the medicalisation of menopause: Reclaiming the body through design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16.
[7]
Patricia Hill Collins. 2022. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. routledge.
[8]
Anna Croon. 2022. Thinking with care in human-computer interaction. Feminist Theory, Vol. 23, 2 (2022), 232--246.
[9]
Maria Puig de La Bellacasa. 2017. Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Vol. 41. U of Minnesota Press.
[10]
Sarah Fentem. 2023. Abortions shoot up in Illinois as more states ban procedure. https://www.stlpr.org/health-science-environment/2023--11--28/abortions-shoot-up-in-illinois-as-more-states-ban-procedure
[11]
Olivia Goldhill. 2024. Abortion funds run short of money as demand soars and donations fall. https://www.statnews.com/2024/01/23/abortion-fund-warning-demand-up-donations-down/
[12]
Shalene Gupta. 2024. Say Hello to Charley, the chatbot built to get abortion-seekers the info they need. https://www.fastcompany.com/91054525/charley-abortion-chatbot
[13]
Karey Helms and Ylva Fernaeus. 2021. Troubling Care: Four Orientations for Wickedness in Design. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 789--801.
[14]
Dorothy Howard and Lilly Irani. 2019. Ways of knowing when research subjects care. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16.
[15]
Colin LeFevre, Aswati Panicker, Sitha Vallabhaneni, Nikhil Dinesh, Forum Modi, Katie Siek, and Chia-Fang Chung. 2023. 'I Don't Need a Megaphone to Be Helpful': Probing the Role of Technology in Pro-Choice Abortion Activism. In Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 307--311.
[16]
Lydia Michie, Madeline Balaam, John McCarthy, Timur Osadchiy, and Kellie Morrissey. 2018. From her story, to our story: Digital storytelling as public engagement around abortion rights advocacy in Ireland. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[17]
Michelle Murphy. 2012. Seizing the means of reproduction: Entanglements of feminism, health, and technoscience. Duke University Press.
[18]
Judy Norsigian et al. 2011. Our bodies, ourselves. Simon and Schuster.
[19]
Adrian Petterson, Keith Cheng, and Priyank Chandra. 2023. Playing with power tools: Design toolkits and the framing of equity. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--24.
[20]
Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha. 2018. Care work: Dreaming disability justice. (2018).
[21]
Elizabeth Pleasants, Lindsay Parham, Karen Weidert, Emma Anderson, Eliza Dolgins, Ndola Prata, Ushma D Upadhyay, and Cassondra Marshall. 2024. Waiting to start abortion: A qualitative exploration of narratives of waiting shared in a Reddit community for abortion post-Dobbs leak in 2022. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 349 (2024), 116877.
[22]
Lara Reime, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, and Marisa Leavitt Cohn. 2023. Walking Through Normativities of Reproductive Bodies: A Method for Critical Analysis of Tracking Applications. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[23]
Loretta Ross and Rickie Solinger. 2017. Reproductive justice: An introduction. Vol. 1. Univ of California Press.
[24]
Amanda Seitz. 2023. As south bans abortion, thousands turn to Illinois clinics. https://apnews.com/article/abortion-bans-illinois-clinic-south-travel-demand-a30afcbd022cdeeb92b9aa5788421687
[25]
Dean Spade. 2020. Mutual aid: Building solidarity during this crisis (and the next). Verso Books.
[26]
Bianca M Stifani, Melanie Peters, Katherine French, and Roopan K Gill. 2023. There's an App for it: A systematic review of mobile apps providing information about abortion using a revised MARS scale., Vol. 2, 7 (2023).
[27]
Joan C Tronto. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Psychology Press.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW Companion '24: Companion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
November 2024
755 pages
ISBN:9798400711145
DOI:10.1145/3678884
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 November 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. abortion
  2. activism
  3. care
  4. design
  5. reproductive justice

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract

Funding Sources

  • SSHRC Doctoral Fellowships

Conference

CSCW '24
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 19
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media