Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3659994.3660309acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshpdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Striking Trade-off Between High Performance and Energy Efficiency in an Edge Computing Application for Detecting Floating Plastic Debris

Published: 29 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The Edge Computing environments facilitate the creation of pervasive applications distributed across vast geographical regions, addressing particular challenges associated with centralized information processing, such as network bandwidth saturation and the requirement for extensive computing infrastructures. However, the performance of edge nodes is not comparable to that of high-end servers. Consequently, researchers must adopt specific methodologies to account for the influence of the computing environment on application development. The present study introduces an application to detect floating plastic debris using low-power and high-performance edge computing devices. The primary objective is to establish a methodology for achieving an optimal balance between performance and energy consumption. The applications were validated using a Nvidia Jetson Nano sensor board, demonstrating favorable accuracy, effectiveness, and reduced energy consumption.

References

[1]
Gianluca De Lucia, Marco Lapegna, and Diego Romano. 2023. Unlocking the Potential of Edge Computing for Hyperspectral Image Classification: An Efficient Low-Energy Strategy. Future Generation Computer Systems 147,Numero (2023), 207--218.
[2]
Shuiguang Deng, Hailiang Zhao, Weijia Fang, Jianwei Yin, Schahram Dustdar, and Albert Y. Zomaya. 2020. Edge Intelligence: The Confluence of Edge Computing and Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Internet Things J. 7 (2020), 7457--7469.
[3]
Jack Dongarra, Dennis Gannon, Geoffrey Fox, and Ken Kennedy. 2007. The Impact of Multicore on Computational Science Software. CT Watch. Quaterly 3 (2007), 1--10.
[4]
Lonneke Goddijn-Murphy and Benjamin Williamson. 2019. On thermal infrared remote sensing of plastic pollution in natural waters. Remote Sensing 11, 18 (2019), 2159.
[5]
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770--778.
[6]
Andrew Howard, Mark Sandler, Grace Chu, Liang-Chieh Chen, Bo Chen, Mingxing Tan, Weijun Wang, Yukun Zhu, Ruoming Pang, Vijay Vasudevan, et al. 2019. Searching for mobilenetv3. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. 1314--1324.
[7]
Tom Howley, Michael G. Madden, Marie-Louise O'Connell, and Alan G. Ryder. 2005. The Effect of Principal Component Analysis on Machine Learning Accuracy with High Dimensional Spectral Data. In Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XIII. Springer, London, 209--222.
[8]
Hugging Face. 2022. plastic_in_river dataset. https:://huggingface.co/datasets/Kili/plastic_in_river last accessed on Jun. 30, 2023.
[9]
Forrest N Iandola, Song Han, Matthew W Moskewicz, Khalid Ashraf, William J Dally, and Kurt Keutzer. 2016. SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and < 0.5 MB model size. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.07360 (2016).
[10]
Wazir Zada Khan, Ejaz Ahmed, Saqib Hakak, Ibrar Yaqoob, and Arif Ahmed. 2019. Edge computing: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems 97 (2019), 219--235.
[11]
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2012. ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25, F. Pereira, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.). Curran Associates, Inc., 1097--1105.
[12]
Kyriaki Kylili, Ioannis Kyriakides, Alessandro Artusi, and Constantinos Hadjistassou. 2019. Identifying floating plastic marine debris using a deep learning approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 (2019), 17091--17099.
[13]
Marco Lapegna and Silvia Stranieri. 2022. DClu: A Direction-Based Clustering Algorithm for VANETs Management. In 15th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS-2021) (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 279). Springer Nature, 253--262.
[14]
D. Di Luccio, A. Riccio, A. Galletti, G. Laccetti, M. Lapegna, L. Marcellino, S. Kosta, and R. Montella. 2020. Coastal Marine Data Crowdsourcing Using the Internet of Floating Things: Improving the Results of a Water Quality Model. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 101209--101223.
[15]
Ningning Ma, Xiangyu Zhang, Hai-Tao Zheng, and Jian Sun. 2018. Shufflenet v2: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). 116--131.
[16]
H. Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Agüera y Arcas. 2017. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) 2017 (PMLR, Vol. 54). 1273--1282.
[17]
Aditi Misra, Aaron Gooze, Kari Watkins, Mariam Asad, and Christopher A Le Dantec. 2014. Crowdsourcing and its application to transportation data collection and management. Transportation Research Record 2414, 1 (2014), 1--8.
[18]
Raffaele Montella, Sokol Kosta, and Ian Foster. 2018. DYNAMO: Distributed leisure yacht-carried sensor-network for atmosphere and marine data crowdsourcing applications. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (IC2E). IEEE, 333--339.
[19]
Mehrdad Moshtaghi, Els Knaeps, Sindy Sterckx, Shungudzemwoyo Garaba, and Dieter Meire. 2021. Spectral reflectance of marine macroplastics in the VNIR and SWIR measured in a controlled environment. Scientific Report 11 (2021), 5436.
[20]
Nvidia. 2019. Jetson Nano Developer Kit. https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/jetson-nano-developer-kit last accessed on Jan. 31, 2024.
[21]
Diego Romano and Marco Lapegna. 2021. A GPU-Parallel Image Coregistration Algorithm for InSar Processing at the Edge. Sensors 21, 17 (2021), 5916.
[22]
Mark Sandler, Andrew Howard, Menglong Zhu, Andrey Zhmoginov, and Liang-Chieh Chen. 2018. Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 4510--4520.
[23]
Weisong Shi, Jie Cao, Quan Zhang, Youhuizi Li, and Lanyu Xu. 2016. Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 3, 5 (2016), 637--646.
[24]
Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).
[25]
Vivienne Sze, Yu-Hsin Chen, Tien-Ju Yang, and Joel Emer. 2007. Efficient processing of deep neural networks: A tutorial and survey. Proc. IEEE 105 (2007), 2295--2329.
[26]
Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. 2019. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 6105--6114.
[27]
Paolo Tasseron, Tim Van Emmerik, Joseph Peller, Luoise Schreyers, and Lauren Bierman. 2021. Advancing floating macroplastic detection from space using experimental hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing 13, 12 (2021), 2335.
[28]
Colin van Lieshout, Kees van Oeveren, Tim van Emmerik, and Eric Postma. 2020. On thermal infrared remote sensing of plastic pollution in natural waters. Earth and space science 7, 8 (2020), e2019EA000960.
[29]
C. De Vita, G. Mellone, D. D. Sanchez-Gallegos, G. Coviello, D. Romano, M. Lapegna, and A. Ciaramella. 2023. Citizen Science for the Sea with Information Technologies: An Open Platform for Gathering Marine Data and Marine Litter Detection from Leisure Boat Instruments. In 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science). IEEE Computer Society, 1--9.
[30]
Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune, Yoshua Bengio, and Hod Lipson. 2014. How transferable are features in deep neural networks?. In Advances in neural information processing systems. Curran Associates, Inc., 3320--3328.

Index Terms

  1. Striking Trade-off Between High Performance and Energy Efficiency in an Edge Computing Application for Detecting Floating Plastic Debris

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        FRAME '24: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Flexible Resource and Application Management on the Edge
        June 2024
        64 pages
        ISBN:9798400706417
        DOI:10.1145/3659994
        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

        Sponsors

        In-Cooperation

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 29 July 2024

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. edge computing
        2. environmental monitoring applications
        3. AI-based classification algorithms
        4. high performance
        5. energy efficiency

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Funding Sources

        • PRIN-PNRR 2022 project STRUDEL
        • National Center for HPC, Big Data, and Quantum Computing

        Conference

        FRAME '24
        Sponsor:

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 32
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
        Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media