Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3652037.3652078acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Examining Diverse Gender Dynamics in Human-Robot Interaction: Trust Privacy and Safety Perceptions

Published: 26 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This research adopts a multidisciplinary approach, synthesizing insights from psychology, technology, and ethics to unravel the intricate threads of diverse gender perceptions regarding trust-building, privacy considerations, and safety concerns in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Our study contributes to a holistic understanding of HRI dynamics, providing valuable insights for designing robots to assist individuals with their Activities of Daily Living (ADL) at home, including tasks such as preparing their daily meals independently. This study delves into the correlation between robot failures and gender perceptions of trust, privacy, and safety when a human communicates with a robot in a natural way by using unstructured speech. In this approach, the user commands the robot conversationally using natural spoken language to fetch cooking-related items in a research lab’s mocked-up kitchen. With a participant pool of 35 adults (13 females with an average age of 35.58 ± 12.06 and 22 males with an average age of 35.68 ± 15.35), Kendall’s Tau correlations are employed for statistical analysis, offering a comprehensive investigation into the intricate interplay of gender, interaction methods, and perceptions in the realm of human-robot dynamics.

References

[1]
Neziha Akalin, Annica Kristoffersson, and Amy Loutfi. 2022. Do you feel safe with your robot? Factors influencing perceived safety in human-robot interaction based on subjective and objective measures. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 158 (2022), 102744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102744
[2]
Haldun Akoglu. 2018. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine 18 (9 2018), 91. Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TJEM.2018.08.001
[3]
Emma Alexander, Caroline Bank, Jie Jessica Yang, Bradley Hayes, and Brian Scassellati. 2014. Asking for help from a gendered robot. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 36 (2014), 2333–2338.
[4]
Laura L. Bierema. 1996. How executive women learn corporate culture. Human Resource Development Quarterly 7 (1996), 145–164. Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/HRDQ.3920070206
[5]
Carlo Bonferroni. 1936. Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita. Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commericiali di Firenze 8 (1936), 3–62.
[6]
John Brooke. 1996. Sus: a “quick and dirty’usability. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 3 (1996), 189–194.
[7]
K Chi’ and Batya Frieainan. 1995. "It’s the Computer’s Fault" - Reasoning About Computers as Moral Agents. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (5 1995), 226–227. https://doi.org/10.1145/223355.223537
[8]
Marie Thérèse Claes. 1999. Women, men and management styles. International Labour Review 138 (1999), 431–446. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1564-913X.1999.TB00396.X
[9]
Jin Gao, Qing Gao, Liting Huo, and Jianchuang Yang. 2022. Impaired Activity of Daily Living Status of the Older Adults and Its Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315607
[10]
Maartje M A De Graaf and Bertram F Malle. 2017. How People Explain Action (and Autonomous Intelligent Systems Should Too). (2017). www.aaai.org
[11]
Lisa M. Haddad, Pavan Annamaraju, and Tammy J. Toney-Butler. 2023. Nursing Shortage. British Medical Journal 3 (2 2023), 534–535. Issue 5669. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.3.5669.534-e
[12]
Pamela J. Hinds, Teresa L. Roberts, and Hank Jones. 2004. Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task. Human–Computer Interaction (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2004.9667343
[13]
Krishna Kodur, Manizheh Zand, and Maria Kyrarini. 2023. Towards Robot Learning from Spoken Language. 1 (3 2023), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580053
[14]
Krishna Kodur, Manizheh Zand, and Maria Kyrarini. 2023. Towards Robot Learning from Spoken Language. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 112–116.
[15]
Krishna Kodur, Manizheh Zand, Matthew Tognotti, Cinthya Jauregui, and Maria Kyrarini. 2023. Structured and Unstructured Speech2Action Frameworks for Human-Robot Collaboration: A User Study. (8 2023). https://doi.org/10.36227/TECHRXIV.24022452.V1
[16]
Maria Kyrarini, Quan Zheng, Muhammad Abdul Haseeb, and Axel Gräser. 2019. Robot learning of assistive manipulation tasks by demonstration via head gesture-based interface. In 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). IEEE, 1139–1146.
[17]
Xin Lei and Pei-Luen Patrick Rau. 2021. Should I Blame the Human or the Robot? Attribution Within a Human-Robot Group. International Journal of Social Robotics 13 (2021), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00645-w
[18]
Paul Schermerhorn, Matthias Scheutz, and Charles R. Crowell. 2008. Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males?IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2008), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349857
[19]
Megan Strait, Priscilla Briggs, and Matthias Scheutz. 2015. Gender, more so than Age, Modulates Positive Perceptions of Language-Based Human-Robot Interaction. In 4th International Syposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, AISB. https://hrilab.tufts.edu/publications/straitetal15aisb.pdf
[20]
Sai Vemprala, Rogerio Bonatti, Arthur Bucker, and Ashish Kapoor. 2023. Chatgpt for robotics: Design principles and model abilities. Microsoft Auton. Syst. Robot. Res 2 (2023), 20.
[21]
Estlin Waters. 1985. Report of a WHO Scientific Group on the Epidemiology of Aging, The Uses of Epidemiology in the Study of the Elderly, Technical Report Series 706. World Health Organisation, Geneva, 1984, 84 pp., 8 Sw. f., ISBN 92 4 120706X. Ageing & Society 5 (12 1985), 513–514. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X00012174
[22]
Sarah Woods, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Christina Kaouri, René te Boekhorst, Kheng Lee Koay, and Michael L. Walters. 2007. Are robots like people?: Relationships between participant and robot personality traits in human–robot interaction studies. Interaction Studies 8 (1 2007), 281–305. Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1075/IS.8.2.06WOO

Index Terms

  1. Examining Diverse Gender Dynamics in Human-Robot Interaction: Trust Privacy and Safety Perceptions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PETRA '24: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
    June 2024
    708 pages
    ISBN:9798400717604
    DOI:10.1145/3652037
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 June 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Ethical Considerations
    2. Gender
    3. Human-Robot Interaction
    4. Trust
    5. Usability

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    PETRA '24

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 169
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)169
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)39
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media