Toward Fair Ultrasound Computing Tomography: Challenges, Solutions and Outlook
Pages 748 - 753
Abstract
Medical image reconstruction plays a pivotal role in early cancer detection, which can significantly enhance both the quality and longevity of a patient’s life through timely treatment. However, the extent to which current image reconstruction methods accurately represent all populations, and whether they underperform for certain groups, remains largely unexplored. In this work, we will examine the deep learning (DL)–based approach to image reconstruction and its associated fairness concerns. Initially, our experiments confirmed the unfairness’s presence. Subsequently, by addressing the issue from two perspectives, we gained valuable insights, which deepened our understanding of the problem. To assess a model’s fairness, it’s crucial to evaluate it from various perspectives, as relying on a single metric can often yield misleading results.
References
[1]
[n. d.]. breast cancer. https://www.breastcancer.org/facts-statistics/.
[2]
[n. d.]. metrics. https://www.mathworks.com/help/risk/explore-fairness-metrics-for-credit-scoring-model.html/.
[3]
Cynthia L Bennett and Os Keyes. 2020. What is the point of fairness? Disability, AI and the complexity of justice. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing125 (2020), 1–1.
[4]
Su Lin Blodgett and Brendan O’Connor. 2017. Racial disparity in natural language processing: A case study of social media african-american english. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00061 (2017).
[5]
Norman F Boyd, Helen Guo, Lisa J Martin, Limei Sun, Jennifer Stone, Eve Fishell, Roberta A Jong, Greg Hislop, Anna Chiarelli, Salomon Minkin, 2007. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. New England journal of medicine 356, 3 (2007), 227–236.
[6]
Kai-Wei Chang, Vinod Prabhakaran, and Vicente Ordonez. 2019. Bias and fairness in natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP): Tutorial Abstracts.
[7]
Yuning Du, Yuyang Xue, Rohan Dharmakumar, and Sotirios A Tsaftaris. 2023. Unveiling Fairness Biases in Deep Learning-Based Brain MRI Reconstruction. In Workshop on Clinical Image-Based Procedures. Springer, 102–111.
[8]
Cynthia Dwork, Nicole Immorlica, Adam Tauman Kalai, and Max Leiserson. 2017. Decoupled classifiers for fair and efficient machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06613 (2017).
[9]
Carl D’Orsi, L Bassett, S Feig, 2018. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Breast imaging atlas, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston (2018).
[10]
Weituo Hao, Mostafa El-Khamy, Jungwon Lee, Jianyi Zhang, Kevin J Liang, Changyou Chen, and Lawrence Carin Duke. 2021. Towards fair federated learning with zero-shot data augmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3310–3319.
[11]
Alain Hore and Djemel Ziou. 2010. Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM. In 2010 20th international conference on pattern recognition. IEEE, 2366–2369.
[12]
Jeremy Kawahara, Sara Daneshvar, Giuseppe Argenziano, and Ghassan Hamarneh. 2018. Seven-point checklist and skin lesion classification using multitask multimodal neural nets. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 23, 2 (2018), 538–546.
[13]
Panagiotis Koulountzios, Tomasz Rymarczyk, and Manuchehr Soleimani. 2021. A triple-modality ultrasound computed tomography based on full-waveform data for industrial processes. IEEE Sensors Journal 21, 18 (2021), 20896–20909.
[14]
Hongming Li and Yong Fan. 2019. Early prediction of Alzheimer’s disease dementia based on baseline hippocampal MRI and 1-year follow-up cognitive measures using deep recurrent neural networks. In 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019). IEEE, 368–371.
[15]
Bingyu Liu, Weihong Deng, Yaoyao Zhong, Mei Wang, Jiani Hu, Xunqiang Tao, and Yaohai Huang. 2019. Fair loss: Margin-aware reinforcement learning for deep face recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 10052–10061.
[16]
Pingchuan Ma, Shuai Wang, and Jin Liu. 2020. Metamorphic Testing and Certified Mitigation of Fairness Violations in NLP Models. In IJCAI. 458–465.
[17]
Aditya Krishna Menon and Robert C Williamson. 2018. The cost of fairness in binary classification. In Conference on Fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR, 107–118.
[18]
Thomas Robins, Jorge Camacho, Oscar Calderon Agudo, Joaquin L Herraiz, and Lluís Guasch. 2021. Deep-learning-driven full-waveform inversion for ultrasound breast imaging. Sensors 21, 13 (2021), 4570.
[19]
Yuji Roh, Kangwook Lee, Steven Euijong Whang, and Changho Suh. 2020. Fairbatch: Batch selection for model fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.01696 (2020).
[20]
Nicole V Ruiter, Michael Zapf, Torsten Hopp, Robin Dapp, Ernst Kretzek, Matthias Birk, Benedikt Kohout, and Hartmut Gemmeke. 2012. 3D ultrasound computer tomography of the breast: A new era?European Journal of Radiology 81 (2012), S133–S134.
[21]
Sebastian Schelter, Yuxuan He, Jatin Khilnani, and Julia Stoyanovich. 2019. Fairprep: Promoting data to a first-class citizen in studies on fairness-enhancing interventions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.12587 (2019).
[22]
Shubham Sharma, Yunfeng Zhang, Jesús M Ríos Aliaga, Djallel Bouneffouf, Vinod Muthusamy, and Kush R Varshney. 2020. Data augmentation for discrimination prevention and bias disambiguation. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 358–364.
[23]
Yi Sheng, Junhuan Yang, Yawen Wu, Kevin Mao, Yiyu Shi, Jingtong Hu, Weiwen Jiang, and Lei Yang. 2022. The larger the fairer? small neural networks can achieve fairness for edge devices. In Proceedings of the 59th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference. 163–168.
[24]
Christina Wadsworth, Francesca Vera, and Chris Piech. 2018. Achieving fairness through adversarial learning: an application to recidivism prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.00199 (2018).
[25]
Ge Wang, Jong Chul Ye, and Bruno De Man. 2020. Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction. Nature machine intelligence 2, 12 (2020), 737–748.
[26]
Kun Wang, Thomas Matthews, Fatima Anis, Cuiping Li, Neb Duric, and Mark A Anastasio. 2015. Waveform inversion with source encoding for breast sound speed reconstruction in ultrasound computed tomography. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control 62, 3 (2015), 475–493.
[27]
Tianlu Wang, Jieyu Zhao, Mark Yatskar, Kai-Wei Chang, and Vicente Ordonez. 2019. Balanced datasets are not enough: Estimating and mitigating gender bias in deep image representations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 5310–5319.
[28]
Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing 13, 4 (2004), 600–612.
[29]
Zeyu Wang, Klint Qinami, Ioannis Christos Karakozis, Kyle Genova, Prem Nair, Kenji Hata, and Olga Russakovsky. 2020. Towards fairness in visual recognition: Effective strategies for bias mitigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 8919–8928.
[30]
Yue Wu and Youzuo Lin. 2019. InversionNet: An efficient and accurate data-driven full waveform inversion. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging 6 (2019), 419–433.
[31]
Depeng Xu, Shuhan Yuan, Lu Zhang, and Xintao Wu. 2018. Fairgan: Fairness-aware generative adversarial networks. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 570–575.
[32]
Han Xu, Xiaorui Liu, Yaxin Li, Anil Jain, and Jiliang Tang. 2021. To be robust or to be fair: Towards fairness in adversarial training. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 11492–11501.
[33]
Tian Xu, Jennifer White, Sinan Kalkan, and Hatice Gunes. 2020. Investigating bias and fairness in facial expression recognition. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020 Workshops: Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part VI 16. Springer, 506–523.
[34]
Junhuan Yang, Yi Sheng, Sizhe Zhang, Ruixuan Wang, Kenneth Foreman, Mikell Paige, Xun Jiao, Weiwen Jiang, and Lei Yang. 2022. Automated architecture search for brain-inspired hyperdimensional computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.05827 (2022).
[35]
Junhuan Yang, Yi Sheng, Yuzhou Zhang, Weiwen Jiang, and Lei Yang. 2023. On-device unsupervised image segmentation. In 2023 60th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC). IEEE, 1–6.
[36]
Junhuan Yang, Hanchen Wang, Yi Sheng, Youzuo Lin, and Lei Yang. 2024. A Physics-guided Generative AI Toolkit for Geophysical Monitoring. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03131 (2024).
[37]
Yifu Zhang, Chunyu Wang, Xinggang Wang, Wenjun Zeng, and Wenyu Liu. 2021. Fairmot: On the fairness of detection and re-identification in multiple object tracking. International Journal of Computer Vision 129 (2021), 3069–3087.
[38]
Yuyin Zhou, Shih-Cheng Huang, Jason Alan Fries, Alaa Youssef, Timothy J Amrhein, Marcello Chang, Imon Banerjee, Daniel Rubin, Lei Xing, Nigam Shah, 2021. Radfusion: Benchmarking performance and fairness for multimodal pulmonary embolism detection from ct and ehr. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.11665 (2021).
Recommendations
Performance evaluation of a fair backoff algorithm for IEEE 802.11 DFWMAC
MobiHoc '02: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computingDue to hidden terminals and a dynamic topology, contention among stations in an ad-hoc network is not homogeneous. Some stations are at a disadvantage in opportunity of access to the shared channel and can suffer severe throughput degradation when the ...
Inter-AP coordination for fair throughput in infrastructure-based IEEE 802.11 mesh networks
IWCMC '06: Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Wireless communications and mobile computingThis paper studies throughput fairness among different basic service sets (BSSs) in infrastructure-based IEEE 802.11 mesh networks, where inter-BSS interference is unavoidable because of the difficulty in frequency and coverage planning and the limited ...
Enhanced binary exponential backoff algorithm for fair channel access in the ieee 802.11 medium access control protocol
The medium access control protocol determines system throughput in wireless mobile ad hoc networks following the ieee 802.11 standard. Under this standard, asynchronous data transmissions have a defined distributed coordination function that allows ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
797 pages
ISBN:9798400706059
DOI:10.1145/3649476
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 12 June 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
GLSVLSI '24
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 312 of 1,156 submissions, 27%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 141Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)141
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)34
Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatGet Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in