Uncovering Meaningful Computing Contexts for Incarcerated College Students
Authors: 
Emma Hogan, John Driscoll, 
Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, 
William Griswold, 
Leo PorterAuthors Info & Claims
Abstract
Higher education is expanding in United States prisons, with a growing demand for STEM offerings. Academics from other disciplines have stressed the importance of culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP) in prison higher education, and computing in context has shown major benefits in CS1--- especially for women and nontraditional students. More work is needed to determine what contexts are relevant to incarcerated college students, and how to incorporate these into computing curricula. In this paper, we build on prior work on computing in context and culturally relevant techniques in computing. We analyze course data from a CS1 course taught in a college-in-prison program to answer the following research question: What contexts do incarcerated students in CS1 find relevant? We identify 24 topics pursued by students across 78 open-ended programming assignment submissions, the three most popular being business management, sports statistics, and physical health. These results offer insight into potential contexts that are meaningful to incarcerated college students to be incorporated into future computing curricula and interventions in prisons.
References
[1]
[n. d.]. STEM Opportunities in Prison Settings (STEM-OPS). https:// stemforall2020.videohall.com/presentations/1801.html
[2]
2022. Global Prison Trends 2022. Technical Report. Penal Reform International. https://www.penalreform.org/global-prison-trends-2022/
[3]
James R. Aman. 1990. Computer science in correctional education. In Proceedings of the twenty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE '90. ACM Press, Washington, D.C., United States, 147--151. https: //doi.org/10.1145/323410.323436
[4]
William H. Bares, Bill Manaris, Renée McCauley, and Christine Moore. 2019. Achieving Gender Balance through Creative Expression. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Minneapolis MN USA, 293--299. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287435
[5]
Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. The Lily-Pad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Florence Italy, 423--432. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357123
[6]
Erin L. Castro, Caisa E. Royer, Stephanie Gaskill, and Estefanie Aguilar-Padilla. 2022. "It's Useless, to Put it Politely": Experiences with Technology Among Incarcerated Students Receiving Second Chance Pell at Four Institutions. Brief 9. Collaborative for Higher Education Research and Policy, The University of Utah. https://cherp.utah.edu/projects/pell_is_not_enough.php#publications-slide
[7]
Patrick Filipe Conway. 2022. Andragogy in Prison: Higher Education in Prison and the Tenets of Adult Education. Adult Education Quarterly 72, 4 (Nov. 2022), 361-- 379. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136221100481 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
[8]
Steve Cooper and Steve Cunningham. 2010. Teaching computer science in context. ACM Inroads 1, 1 (March 2010), 5--8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1721933.1721934
[9]
Trevor Craft, Nicholas Gonzalez, Kevin Kelleher, Miki Rose, and Ofu Takor. 2019. A Second Chance: College-in-Prison Programs in New York State. Technical Report. Nelson A. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED605777 Publication Title: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government ERIC Number: ED605777.
[10]
A. Cheryl Curtis. 1998. Creating Culturally Responsive Curriculum: Making Race Matter. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 71, 3 (Jan. 1998), 135--139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659809599344
[11]
Reginold P Daniels. 2019. Exploring Ways to Bring Culturally Relevant Pedagogy into Rehabilitative Programs. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of San Francisco.
[12]
Lois Davis. 2019. Higher Education Programs in Prison: What We Know Now and What We Should Focus On Going Forward. Technical Report. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/PE342
[13]
Patrice B French. 2019. Culturally Relevant Practice Frameworks and Application in Adult Education. Adult Education Research Conference (2019). https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2019/papers/27
[14]
Stephanie Gaskill, Mary R. Gould, Ved Price, Erin L. Castro, and Amy Lerman. 2023. The Landscape of Higher Education in Prison, 2020--2021. Technical Report. Alliance for Higher Education in Prison. http://higheredinprison.org
[15]
Geneva Gay. 2018. Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. teachers college press.
[16]
Mark Guzdial. 2003. A media computation course for non-majors. In Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. ACM, Thessaloniki Greece, 104--108. https://doi.org/10.1145/961511. 961542
[17]
Mark Guzdial. 2010. Does contextualized computing education help? ACM Inroads 1, 4 (Dec. 2010), 4--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/1869746.1869747
[18]
Mark Guzdial. 2013. Exploring hypotheses about media computation. In Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research. ACM, San Diego San California USA, 19--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.2493397
[19]
Mark Guzdial and Andrea Forte. 2005. Design process for a non-majors computing course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 37, 1 (Feb. 2005), 361--365. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1047124.1047468
[20]
Gloria Ladson-Billings. 1995. But That's Just Good Teaching! The Case for Culturally Relevant Pedagogy. THEORY INTO PRACTICE (1995).
[21]
Tia C. Madkins, Alexis Martin, Jean Ryoo, Kimberly A. Scott, Joanna Goode, Allison Scott, and Frieda McAlear. 2019. Culturally Relevant Computer Science Pedagogy: From Theory to Practice. In 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1--4. https: //doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT46404.2019.8985773
[22]
Jane Margolis, Rachel Estrella, Joanna Goode, Jennifer Jellison Holme, and Kim Nao. 2017. Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. The MIT Press.
[23]
Jessica Morales-Chicas, Mauricio Castillo, Ireri Bernal, Paloma Ramos, and Bianca Guzman. 2019. Computing with Relevance and Purpose: A Review of Culturally Relevant Education in Computing. International Journal of Multicultural Education 21, 1 (March 2019), 125--155. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v21i1.1745
[24]
Monique O. Ositelu. 2019. Equipping Individuals for Life Beyond Bars. Technical Report. New America. http://newamerica.org/education-policy/reports/equippingindividuals-life-beyond-bars/
[25]
Leo Porter, Mark Guzdial, Charlie McDowell, and Beth Simon. 2013. Success in introductory programming: what works? Commun. ACM 56, 8 (Aug. 2013), 34--36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2492007.2492020
[26]
Lauren Rich, Heather Perry, and Mark Guzdial. 2004. A CS1 course designed to address interests of women. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 36, 1 (March 2004), 190--194. https://doi.org/10.1145/1028174.971370
[27]
Yolanda Sealey-Ruiz. 2007. Wrapping the Curriculum Around Their Lives: Using a Culturally Relevant Curriculum With African American Adult Women. Adult Education Quarterly 58, 1 (Nov. 2007), 44--60. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0741713607305938 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
[28]
Sadia Sharmin. 2022. Creativity in CS1: A Literature Review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 22, 2 (June 2022), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459995
[29]
Satra Taylor, Jay Holder, Bahiyyah Muhammad, Tiffany Jones, and Lawrence Haynes. 2021. Why Race Matters for Higher Education in Prison. Peabody Journal of Education 96, 5 (Oct. 2021), 588--597. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2021.1991704 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2021.1991704.
[30]
V Taylor. 2016. Diversity gaps in computer science: Exploring the underrepresentation of girls, blacks and hispanics. Google's Computer Science Education Research (2016).
[31]
Michael Williams and Tami Moser. 2019. The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review 15, 1 (2019), 45--55.
Index Terms
- Uncovering Meaningful Computing Contexts for Incarcerated College Students
Recommendations
Challenges and Approaches to Teaching CS1 in Prison
SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1Efforts to bring incarcerated and formerly incarcerated individuals into the field of computing stand to improve equitable access to both computing jobs, and consequently the benefits of our tools and innovations through the inclusion of more diverse ...
An Examination of Literacy and Computer Literacy Amongst Adults Who Are Incarcerated: An Analysis of the PIAAC
In this study, the relationships between literacy, computer experience, and age among and between the general (i.e., "household") and prison samples were examined using the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies. Literacy ...
Engaging college students in service learning to grow the K-12 computing pipeline and prepare the 21st century workforce (abstract only)
SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science educationThe demand for computing professionals in the U.S. workforce is expected to increase over the next several years, while the number of students intending to major in computing has declined. In this BOF session, we focus on the use of service learning to ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2024
776 pages
ISBN:9798400706004
DOI:10.1145/3649217
- General Chairs:
- Mattia Monga,
- Violetta Lonati,
- Erik Barendsen,
- Program Chairs:
- Judithe Sheard,
- James Paterson
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 03 July 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Conference
ITiCSE 2024
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 92Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)92
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in