Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3644479.3644490acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring an Approach on Learning Feedback Strategy in the Metaverse: A Perspective of the Fusion of Multi-source Data

Published: 26 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Feedback is widely recognized as a crucial element in promoting the overall quality of education. However, the approach of feedback within the emerging Metaverse remains unclear. This study aims to address this gap by conducting an exploratory investigation into the feedback approach in the Metaverse. By utilizing supplementary log data and eye-tracking data, a feedback framework driven by multiple data sources is proposed. The findings of this study have significant implications for both theoretical and practical research in virtual learning, shedding light on the intricate feedback processes within the Metaverse and its potential to enhance educational practices.

References

[1]
Shute V J. Focus on formative feedback[J]. Review of educational research, 2008, 78(1): 153-189.
[2]
Hung S T A. Enhancing feedback provision through multimodal video technology[J]. Computers & Education, 2016, 98: 90-101.
[3]
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 3087.
[4]
Altan T, Cagiltay K. An Eye Tracking Based Investigation of Multimedia Learning Design in Science Education Textbooks[J]. Educational Technology & Society, 2022, 25(2): 48-61.
[5]
Ramaprasad A. On the definition of feedback[J]. Behavioral science, 1983, 28(1): 4-13.
[6]
Cohen A, Singh D. Effective student feedback as a marker for student success[J]. South African Journal of Higher Education, 2020, 34(5): 151-165.
[7]
Cole A, Anderson C, Bunton T, Student predisposition to instructor feedback and perceptions of teaching presence predict motivation toward online courses[J]. Online Learning Journal, 2017, 21(4).
[8]
Hargreaves E. Teachers' classroom feedback: still trying to get it right[J]. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 2012, 7(1): 1-15.
[9]
Merisotis J P, Phipps R A. What's the difference?: Outcomes of distance vs. traditional classroom-based learning[J]. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 1999, 31(3): 12-17.
[10]
Qi X, Sun G, Yue L. Applying Self-Optimised Feedback to a Learning Management System for Facilitating Personalised Learning Activities on Massive Open Online Courses[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(16): 12562.
[11]
Janelli M, Lipnevich A A. Effects of pre-tests and feedback on performance outcomes and persistence in Massive Open Online Courses[J]. Computers & Education, 2021, 161: 104076.
[12]
Zhai X, Chu X, Chen M, Can Edu-Metaverse Reshape Virtual Teaching Community (VTC) to Promote Educational Equity? An Exploratory Study[J]. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2023.
[13]
Dang J, King K M, Inzlicht M. Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated?[J]. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2020, 24(4): 267-269.
[14]
Ning H, Wang H, Lin Y, A Survey on the Metaverse: The State-of-the-Art, Technologies, Applications, and Challenges[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023.
[15]
Bednar P M, Welch C. Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: Creating meaningful and sustainable systems[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2020, 22(2): 281-298.
[16]
Schindler M, Lilienthal A J. Domain-specific interpretation of eye tracking data: towards a refined use of the eye-mind hypothesis for the field of geometry[J]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2019, 101: 123-139.
[17]
Lai M L, Tsai M J, Yang F Y, A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012[J]. Educational research review, 2013, 10: 90-115.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EBIMCS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
December 2023
265 pages
ISBN:9798400709333
DOI:10.1145/3644479
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 March 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Eye-tracking technology
  2. Feedback
  3. Metaverse
  4. Multi-source data Analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

EBIMCS 2023

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 143 of 708 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 15
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media