Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3523286.3524514acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on perception reconstruction of implantable device based on sensor system

Published: 31 May 2022 Publication History

Abstract

According to the issue of perception reconstruction and blood supply safety after long-term implantation of an artificial anal sphincter (AAS) in a body, a sensor system which could be suitable for in vivo perception and interact with the outside body is proposed and experimentally evaluated. In order to build accuracy perception system, ten pressure sensors are embedded in an artificial anal sphincter. Transcutaneous energy transfer system wireless communication system are adopted to power supply and information interaction. What's more, a mass model which shows a quantitative relationship between the sensor signal and the quality (mass) of the content of the intestinal tract is established. Then the vitro and vivo experiments are conducted to evaluate the reliability of the mass model. Based on vitro experiment results, the accuracy of the reconstruction function is over 90%. Even the results of vivo experiment verified that the accuracy is about 83%, which is acceptable. The mass model based on sensor system is a new way to improve the perception reconstruction for fecal incontinence or the other implantation devices.

References

[1]
Grossi U, De Simone V, Parello A, Gatekeeper improves voluntary contractility in patients with fecal incontinence[J]. Surgical Innovation, 2019, 26(3): 321-327.
[2]
Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence[J]. Lancet (London, England),1987, 23(5): 244-245.
[3]
Katarzyna B, Anne-Marie B. Fecal incontinence: epidemiology, influence and treatment [J]. Clinic for colon and rectal surgery. 2016, 29 (03): 264-270.
[4]
Zellmer T, Macdonald W. Palpable abdominal mass and recurrent fecal incontinence due to failure of artificial bowel sphincter[J]. Radiology case reports, 2019, 14(1): 66-68.
[5]
Wang X, Dasilva G, Maron D J, Outcomes of Reimplantation of the Artificial Bowel Sphincter[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2016, 59(2): 122-126.
[6]
Finlay I G, Richardson W, Hajivassiliou C A. Outcome after implantation of a novel prosthetic anal sphincter in humans[J]. The British Journal of Surgery, 2004, 91(11): 1485-1492.
[7]
Fattorini E, Brusa T, Gingert C, Artificial Muscle Devices: Innovations and Prospects for Fecal Incontinence Treatment[J]. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2016, 44(5): 1355-1369.
[8]
Biardeau X, Hached S, Loutochin O, Montreal electronic artificial urinary sphincters: Our futuristic alternatives to the AMS800™[J]. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 2017, 11(10): E396.
[9]
Christopher C D, Anita H C, Paul D P, The Fenix System for Fecal Incontinence: An Overview and Surgical Demonstration[J]. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016, 23(7):S135-S135.
[10]
Litta F, Parello A, DE SIMONE V, Efficacy of Sphinkeeper™ implant in treating fecal incontinence [J]. The British journal of surgery, 2020, 107(5): 484-488.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
BIC '22: Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing
January 2022
551 pages
ISBN:9781450395755
DOI:10.1145/3523286
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 May 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

BIC 2022

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 35
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media