Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3517428.3550402acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

The Future of Urban Accessibility for People with Disabilities: Data Collection, Analytics, Policy, and Tools

Published: 22 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Inaccessible urban infrastructure creates and reinforces systemic exclusion of people with disabilities and impacts public health, physical activity, and quality of life for all. To improve the design of our cities and to enable more equitable policies and location-centric technology designs, we need new data collection techniques, data standards, and accessibility-infused analytic tools and interactive maps focused on the quality, safety, and accessibility of pathways, transit ecosystems, and buildings. In this workshop, we bring together leading experts in human mobility, urban design, disability, and accessible computing to discuss pressing urban access challenges across the world and brainstorm solutions. We invite contributions from practitioners, transit officials, disability advocates, and researchers.

References

[1]
Marc A. Adams, Christine B. Phillips, Akshar Patel, and Ariane Middel. 2022. Training Computers to See the Built Environment Related to Physical Activity: Detection of Microscale Walkability Features Using Computer Vision. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, 8: 4548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084548
[2]
Andrew R. Benson, Ian G.M. Lawson, Matthew K. Clifford, and Sean M. McBride. 2021. Using robotics to detect footpath displacement caused by tree roots: A proof of concept. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 65: 127312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127312
[3]
N. Bolten, S. Mukherjee, V. Sipeeva, A. Tanweer, and A. Caspi. 2017. A pedestrian-centered data approach for equitable access to urban infrastructure environments. IBM Journal of Research and Development 61, 6: 10:1-10:12. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2017.2736279
[4]
Nicholas Bolten and Anat Caspi. 2019. AccessMap website demonstration: Individualized, accessible pedestrian trip planning at scale. ASSETS 2019 - 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility: 676–678. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3354598
[5]
Nicholas Bolten and Anat Caspi. 2022. Towards operationalizing the communal production and management of public (open) data: a pedestrian network case study. In ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1145/3530190.3534821
[6]
Cheamson Garret K. Boongaling, Donald A. Luna, and Sandra S. Samantela. 2021. Developing a street level walkability index in the Philippines using 3D photogrammetry modeling from drone surveys. GeoJournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10441-2
[7]
Anke M. Brock, Jon E. Froehlich, João Guerreiro, Benjamin Tannert, Anat Caspi, Johannes Schöning, and Steve Landau. 2018. SIG: Making Maps Accessible and Putting Accessibility in Maps. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3185373
[8]
Keith M Christensen, Judith M Holt, and Justin F Wilson. 2010. Effects of perceived neighborhood characteristics and use of community facilities on physical activity of adults with and without disabilities. Preventing chronic disease 7, 5: A105.
[9]
City of Seattle. SDOT Sidewalk Observations. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from https://data.seattle.gov/dataset/Sidewalk-Observations/u2d5-iv5c
[10]
Kelly J Clifton, Andréa D Livi Smith, and Daniel Rodriguez. 2007. The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 80, 1: 95–110. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
[11]
Marius Cordts, Mohamed Omran, Sebastian Ramos, Timo Rehfeld, Markus Enzweiler, Rodrigo Benenson, Uwe Franke, Stefan Roth, and Bernt Schiele. 2016. The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[12]
DeepWalk. DeepWalk: Automated, Practical, Actionable ADA Transition Planning. Retrieved June 12, 2022 from https://www.deepwalkresearch.com/
[13]
Shiloh Deitz, Amy Lobben, and Arielle Alferez. 2021. Squeaky wheels: Missing data, disability, and power in the smart city. Big Data & Society 8, 2: 205395172110477. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211047735
[14]
Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848
[15]
Chaohai Ding, Mike Wald, and Gary Wills. 2014. A survey of open accessibility data. In Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference on - W4A ’14, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2596695.2596708
[16]
Michael Duan, Shosuke Kiami, Logan Milandin, Johnson Kuang, Michael Saugstad, Maryam Hosseini, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2022. Scaling Crowd+AI Sidewalk Accessibility Assessments: Initial Experiments Examining Label Quality and Cross-city Training on Performance. In Poster Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’22).
[17]
Yochai Eisenberg, Amy Heider, Rob Gould, and Robin Jones. 2020. Are communities in the United States planning for pedestrians with disabilities? Findings from a systematic evaluation of local government barrier removal plans. Cities 102: 102720. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102720
[18]
Yochai Eisenberg, Kerri A Vanderbom, and Vijay Vasudevan. 2017. Does the built environment moderate the relationship between having a disability and lower levels of physical activity? A systematic review. Preventive Medicine 95: S75–S84. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.019
[19]
Tim Ellis. 2020. Spotted: Amazon robot maps sidewalks north of Seattle, laden with cameras and sensors - GeekWire. GeekWire. Retrieved November 1, 2021 from https://www.geekwire.com/2020/spotted-amazon-robot-maps-sidewalks-north-seattle-laden-cameras-sensors/
[20]
Eric P. S. Baumer, Mahmood Jasim, Ali Sarvghad, and Narges Mahyar. 2022. Of Course it's Political! A Critical Inquiry into Underemphasized Dimensions in Civic Text Visualization. Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis) 2022 41, 3.
[21]
Heather Feldner. 2019. Impacts of early powered mobility provision on disability identity: A case study. Rehabilitation Psychology 64, 2: 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000259
[22]
Heather A. Feldner, Samuel W. Logan, and James C. Galloway. 2016. Why the time is right for a radical paradigm shift in early powered mobility: the role of powered mobility technology devices, policy and stakeholders. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 11, 2: 89–102. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1079651
[23]
Heather A. Feldner, Samuel W. Logan, and James C. Galloway. 2019. Mobility in pictures: a participatory photovoice narrative study exploring powered mobility provision for children and families. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 14, 3: 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1447606
[24]
Jon E Froehlich, Anke M Brock, Anat Caspi, João Guerreiro, Kotaro Hara, Reuben Kirkham, Johannes Schöning, and Benjamin Tannert. 2019. Grand Challenges in Accessible Maps. Interactions 26, 2: 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301657
[25]
Jon E. Froehlich, Fabio Miranda, Maryam Hosseini, Nick Bolten, Anat Caspi, Roberto M. Cesar Jr., Holger Dieterich, Yochai Eisenberg, Victor Pineda, Manaswi Saha, Mikey Saugstad, Andres Sevtsuk, Claudio T. Silva, Eric K. Tokuda, and Sebastian Felix Zappe. 2021. The Future of Global-Scale Spatial Data Collection and Analyses on Urban (in)Accessibility for People with Disabilities. In Spatial Data Science Symposium.
[26]
Jon E Froehlich, Mikey Saugstad, Edgar Martínez, and Rebeca de Buen Kalman. 2020. Sidewalk Accessibility in the US and Mexico: Policies, Tools, and A Preliminary Case Study. In CSCW2020 Workshop on Civic Technologies: Research, Practice, and Open Challenges.
[27]
David Gutman. 2017. Seattle may have to spend millions making sidewalks more accessible to people with disabilities. The Seattle Times.
[28]
Joy Hammel, Susan Magasi, Allen Heinemann, Gale Whiteneck, Jennifer Bogner, and Evelyn Rodriguez. 2008. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation 30, 19: 1445–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701625534
[29]
Kotaro Hara, Christine Chan, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2016. The Design of Assistive Location-based Technologies for People with Ambulatory Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1757–1768. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858315
[30]
Kotaro Hara, Jin Sun, Robert Moore, David Jacobs, and Jon Froehlich. 2014. Tohme: Detecting Curb Ramps in Google Street View Using Crowdsourcing, Computer Vision, and Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647403
[31]
Maryam Hosseini, Fabio Miranda, Jianzhe Lin, and Claudio T. Silva. 2022. CitySurfaces: City-scale semantic segmentation of sidewalk materials. Sustainable Cities and Society 79: 103630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103630
[32]
Qing Hou and Chengbo Ai. 2020. A network-level sidewalk inventory method using mobile LiDAR and deep learning. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 119: 102772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102772
[33]
Winnie Hu. 2017. For the Disabled, New York's Sidewalks Are an Obstacle Course. The New York Times.
[34]
Yusuke Iwasawa, Kouya Nagamine, Ikuko Eguchi Yairi, and Yutaka Matsuo. 2015. Toward an Automatic Road Accessibility Information Collecting and Sharing Based on Human Behavior Sensing Technologies of Wheelchair Users. Procedia Computer Science 63: 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2015.08.314
[35]
Kenneth Bailey, Lori Lobenstine, and Kiara Nagel. 2012. Spatial Justice: A Frame for Reclaiming our Rights to Be, Thrive, Express, and Connect. Retrieved June 12, 2022 from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53c7166ee4b0e7db2be69480/t/540d0e6be4b0d0f54988ce42/1410141803393/SpatialJustice_ds4si.pdf
[36]
Reuben Kirkham, Romeo Ebassa, Kyle Montague, Kellie Morrissey, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Sebastian Weise, and Patrick Olivier. 2017. WheelieMap: An Exploratory System for Qualitative Reports of Inaccessibility in the Built Environment. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ’17), 38:1–38:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098527
[37]
Delphine Labbé, Atiya Mahmood, William C. Miller, and W. ben Mortenson. 2020. Examining the Impact of Knowledge Mobilization Strategies to Inform Urban Stakeholders on Accessibility: A Mixed-Methods study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, 5: 1561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051561
[38]
Delphine Labbé, Atiya Mahmood, François Routhier, Mike Prescott, Émilie Lacroix, William C. Miller, and W. ben Mortenson. 2021. Using photovoice to increase social inclusion of people with disabilities: Reflections on the benefits and challenges. Journal of Community Psychology 49, 1: 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22354
[39]
Anthony Li, Manaswi Saha, Anupam Gupta, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2018. Interactively Modeling and Visualizing Neighborhood Accessibility at Scale. In Extended Abstracts of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 444–446. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3241000
[40]
Kevin Manaugh and Ahmed El-Geneidy. 2011. Validating walkability indices: How do different households respond to the walkability of their neighborhood? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 16, 4: 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009
[41]
Maryam Hosseini, Michael Saugstad, Fabio Miranda, Andres Sevtsuk, Claudio T. Silva, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2022. Towards Global-Scale Crowd+AI Techniques to Map and Assess Sidewalks for People with Disabilities. In CVPR 2022 Workshop on Accessibility, Vision, and Autonomy (AVA).
[42]
Fabio Miranda, Maryam Hosseini, Marcos Lage, Harish Doraiswamy, Graham Dove, and Cláudio T. Silva. 2020. Urban Mosaic: Visual Exploration of Streetscapes Using Large-Scale Image Data. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376399
[43]
Christopher Mitchell. 2006. Pedestrian Mobility and Safety: A Key to Independence for Older People. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 22, 1: 45–52.
[44]
Amin Mobasheri, Jonas Deister, and Holger Dieterich. 2017. Wheelmap: the wheelchair accessibility crowdsourcing platform. Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards 2017 2:1 2, 1: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40965-017-0040-5
[45]
OpenSidewalks. OpenSidewalks Schema. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from https://github.com/OpenSidewalks/OpenSidewalks-Schema
[46]
pathVu. pathVu. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from https://pathvu.com/
[47]
Catia Prandi, Paola Salomoni, and Silvia Mirri. 2014. MPASS: Integrating people sensing and crowdsourcing to map urban accessibility. 2014 IEEE 11th Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC 2014: 591–595. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2014.6940491
[48]
Emily Alpert Reyes. 2015. L.A. agrees to spend $1.3 billion to fix sidewalks in ADA case. Los Angeles Times.
[49]
Sunil Rodger, Dan Jackson, John Vines, Janice McLaughlin, and Peter Wright. 2019. JourneyCam: Exploring Experiences of Accessibility and Mobility among Powered Wheelchair Users through Video and Data. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300860
[50]
Manaswi Saha, Devanshi Chauhan, Siddhant Patil, Rachel Kangas, Jeffrey Heer, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2021. Urban Accessibility as a Socio-Political Problem. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432908
[51]
Manaswi Saha, Siddhant Patil, Emily Cho, Evie Yu-Yen Cheng, Chris Horng, Devanshi Chauhan, Rachel Kangas, Richard McGovern, Anthony Li, Jeffrey Heer, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2022. Visualizing Urban Accessibility: Investigating Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives through a Map-based Design Probe Study. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517460
[52]
Manaswi Saha, Michael Saugstad, Hanuma Teja Maddali, Aileen Zeng, Ryan Holland, Steven Bower, Aditya Dash, Sage Chen, Anthony Li, Kotaro Hara, and Jon Froehlich. 2019. Project Sidewalk: A Web-Based Crowdsourcing Tool for Collecting Sidewalk Accessibility Data At Scale. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300292
[53]
Seattle Department of Transportation. Seattle's Sidewalk Assessment Project. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/about-us/asset-and-performance-management/sidewalk-assessment-project
[54]
Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT). Seattle DOT Sidewalk Condition Assessment Report. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from https://www.seattle.gov/documents/Departments/SDOT/About/SidewalkAssessExecSummary_4_6_2018R5.pdf
[55]
Ather Sharif, Paari Gopal, Michael Saugstad, Shiven Bhatt, Raymond Fok, Galen Weld, Kavi Asher Mankoff Dey, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2021. Experimental Crowd+AI Approaches to Track Accessibility Features in Sidewalk Intersections Over Time. In Extended Abstracts of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3476549
[56]
Aateka Shashank and Nadine Schuurman. 2019. Unpacking walkability indices and their inherent assumptions. Health & Place 55: 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.005
[57]
Jennifer Sills, Aleksandra Kosanic, Jan Petzold, Amy Dunham, and Mialy Razanajatovo. 2019. Climate concerns and the disabled community. Science 366, 6466: 698–699. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9045
[58]
Daniel Sinkonde, Leonard Mselle, Nima Shidende, Sara Comai, and Matteo Matteucci. 2018. Developing an Intelligent PostGIS Database to Support Accessibility Tools for Urban Pedestrians. Urban Science 2, 3: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2030052
[59]
Lisa Stafford, Leonor Vanik, and Lisa K Bates. 2022. Disability Justice and Urban Planning. Planning Theory & Practice 23, 1: 101–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2035545
[60]
Aaron Steinfeld, Leslie Bloomfield, Sarah Amick, Yun Huang, Will Odom, Qian Yang, and John Zimmerman. 2019. Increasing Access to Transit: Localized Mobile Information. Journal of Urban Technology 26, 3: 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1614896
[61]
SustainedAbility. Disability Led Climate Action. Retrieved June 12, 2022 from https://www.sustainedability.org/
[62]
Yuan-Hsu Tseng, Shih-Chung Kang, Jia-Ruey Chang, and Cheng-Hao Lee. 2011. Strategies for autonomous robots to inspect pavement distresses. Automation in Construction 20, 8: 1156–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.018
[63]
United Nations. 2020. The New Urban Agenda. Nairobi, Kenya.
[64]
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. 2015. ADA Transition Plan.
[65]
US Environmental Protection Agency. National Walkability Index User Guide and Methodology. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/national-walkability-index-user-guide-and-methodology
[66]
US Environmental Protection Agency. The National Walkability Index. Retrieved June 13, 2022 from https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/smart-location-mapping#walkability
[67]
Galen Weld, Esther Jang, Anthony Li, Aileen Zeng, Kurtis Heimerl, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2019. Deep Learning for Automatically Detecting Sidewalk Accessibility Problems Using Streetscape Imagery. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353798
[68]
Yuxiang Zhang, Sachin Mehta, and Anat Caspi. 2021. Collecting Sidewalk Network Data at Scale for Accessible Pedestrian Travel. In The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3476560

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Towards Zero-Shot Annotation of the Built Environment with Vision-Language ModelsProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems10.1145/3678717.3691296(601-604)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2024
  • (2024)The Future of Urban Accessibility: The Role of AIProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3688550(1-6)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Towards Fine-Grained Sidewalk Accessibility Assessment with Deep Learning: Initial Benchmarks and an Open DatasetProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3688531(1-12)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The Future of Urban Accessibility for People with Disabilities: Data Collection, Analytics, Policy, and Tools
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ASSETS '22: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
      October 2022
      902 pages
      ISBN:9781450392587
      DOI:10.1145/3517428
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 October 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ASSETS '22
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      ASSETS '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 132 submissions, 27%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)869
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)199
      Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Towards Zero-Shot Annotation of the Built Environment with Vision-Language ModelsProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems10.1145/3678717.3691296(601-604)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2024
      • (2024)The Future of Urban Accessibility: The Role of AIProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3688550(1-6)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Towards Fine-Grained Sidewalk Accessibility Assessment with Deep Learning: Initial Benchmarks and an Open DatasetProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3688531(1-12)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Designing Inclusive Future Augmented RealitiesExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636313(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Co-design Accessible Public Robots: Insights from People with Mobility Disability, Robotic Practitioners and Their CollaborationsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642875(1-20)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)“I never realized sidewalks were a big deal”: A Case Study of a Community-Driven Sidewalk Accessibility Assessment using Project SidewalkProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642003(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2023)Non-Contact and Non-Intrusive Add-on IoT Device for Wireless Remote Elevator ControlApplied Sciences10.3390/app1306397113:6(3971)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2023

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media