Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3517031.3529622acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Trans-Saccadic Extrafoveal Preview Effect is Modulated by Object Visibility

Published: 08 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

We used a gaze-contingent eye-tracking setup to investigate how peripheral vision before the saccade affects post-saccadic foveal processing. Studies have revealed robust changes in foveal processing when the target is available in peripheral vision (the extrafoveal preview effect). To further characterize the role of peripheral vision, we adopted a paradigm where an upright/inverted extrafoveal face stimulus was shown and changed orientation (invalid preview) on 50% of trials during the saccade. Invalid preview significantly reduced post-saccadic discrimination performance compared to valid preview (aka preview effect). In addition, the preview face varied in eccentricity and added noise which affected its visibility. Face visibility was operationalized by a lateralized face identification task, run in a separate session. A mixed model analysis suggests that visibility modulated the preview effect. Overall, these findings constrain theories of how preview effects might influence perception under natural viewing conditions.

References

[1]
Angele, B. and Rayner, K. 2011. Parafoveal Processing of Word n + 2 During Reading: Do the Preceding Words Matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 37, 4, 1210–1220.
[2]
Angele, B., Slattery, T., Yang, J., Kliegl, R., and Rayner, K. 2008. Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously. Visual Cognition 16, 6, 697–707.
[3]
Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., and Tily, H.J. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68, 3, 255–278.
[4]
Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., and Baayen, R.H. 2015. Parsimonious Mixed Models. arXiv preprint.
[5]
Bertera, J.H. and Rayner, K. 2000. Eye movements and the span of the effective stimulus in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics 62, 3, 576–585.
[6]
Buonocore, A., Dimigen, O., and Melcher, D. 2020. Post-Saccadic Face Processing Is Modulated by Pre-Saccadic Preview: Evidence from Fixation-Related Potentials. Journal of Neuroscience 40, 11, 2305–2313.
[7]
Cajar, A., Engbert, R., and Laubrock, J. 2016. Spatial frequency processing in the central and peripheral visual field during scene viewing. Vision Research 127, 186–197.
[8]
Coco, M.I., Nuthmann, A., and Dimigen, O. 2020. Fixation-related Brain Potentials during Semantic Integration of Object–Scene Information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 32, 4, 571–589.
[9]
Cui, L., Yan, G., Bai, X., Hyönä, J., Wang, S., and Liversedge, S.P. 2013. Processing of compound-word characters in reading Chinese: an eye-movement-contingent display change study. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 66, 3, 527–547.
[10]
Diamond, M., Ross, J., and Morrone, M. 2000. Extraretinal control of saccadic suppression. Journal of Neuroscience 20, 9, 3449–3455.
[11]
Diamond, R. and Carey, S. 1986. Why Faces Are and Are Not Special. An Effect of Expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
[12]
Edwards, G., VanRullen, R., and Cavanagh, P. 2018. Decoding Trans-Saccadic Memory. Journal of Neuroscience 38, 5, 1114–1123.
[13]
Fabius, J.H., Fracasso, A., Acunzo, D.J., van der Stigchel, S., and Melcher, D. 2020. Low-Level Visual Information Is Maintained across Saccades, Allowing for a Postsaccadic Handoff between Visual Areas.
[14]
Frömer, R., Dimigen, O., Niefind, F., Krause, N., Kliegl, R., and Sommer, W. 2015. Are individual differences in reading speed related to extrafoveal visual acuity and crowding? PLoS ONE 10, 3.
[15]
Ganmor, E., Landy, M.S., and Simoncelli, E.P. 2015. Near-optimal integration of orientation information across saccades. Journal of Vision 15, 16.
[16]
Golomb, J.D., L'Heureux, Z.E., and Kanwisher, N. 2014. Feature-binding errors after eye movements and shifts of attention. Psychological science 25, 5, 1067.
[17]
Henderson, J., Dixon, P., Petersen, A., Twilley, L., and Ferreira, F. 1995. Evidence for the use of phonological representations during transsaccadic word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 1, 82–97.
[18]
Huber-Huber, C., Buonocore, A., Dimigen, O., Hickey, C., and Melcher, D. 2019. The peripheral preview effect with faces: Combined EEG and eye-tracking suggests multiple stages of trans-saccadic predictive and non-predictive processing. NeuroImage 200, 344–362.
[19]
Huber-Huber, C., Buonocore, A., and Melcher, D. 2021. The extrafoveal preview paradigm as a measure of predictive, active sampling in visual perception. Journal of Vision 21, 7, 12–12.
[20]
Huber-Huber, C. and Melcher, D. 2021. The behavioural preview effect with faces is susceptible to statistical regularities: Evidence for predictive processing across the saccade. Scientific Reports 11, 1, 1–10.
[21]
Hutzler, F., Schuster, S., Marx, C., and Hawelka, S. 2019. An investigation of parafoveal masks with the incremental boundary paradigm. PLOS ONE 14, 2, e0203013.
[22]
Inhoff, A.W. and Liu, W. 1998. The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, 1, 20–34.
[23]
Karras, T., Laine, S., and Aila, T. 2019. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Society, 4396–4405.
[24]
Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., and Pelli, D. 2007. What's new in Psychtoolbox-3? .
[25]
Kliegl, R., Hohenstein, S., Yan, M., and MDonald, S.A. 2013. How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 66, 3, 581–600.
[26]
Kliegl, R., Risse, S., and Laubrock, J. 2007. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+ 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33, 5, 1250–1255.
[27]
Legge, G., Mansfield, J., and Chung, S. 2001. Psychophysics of reading: XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision research 41, 6, 725–743.
[28]
Marx, C., Hawelka, S., … S.S.-J. of C., and 2015, undefined. 2015. An incremental boundary study on parafoveal preprocessing in children reading aloud: Parafoveal masks overestimate the preview benefit. Taylor & Francis 27, 5, 549–561.
[29]
McDonald, S.A. 2005. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is not cumulative across multiple saccades. Vision Research 45, 14, 1829–1834.
[30]
Melcher, D. and Colby, C.L. 2008. Trans-saccadic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12, 12, 466–473.
[31]
Nuthmann, A. 2013. On the visual span during object search in real-world scenes. Visual Cognition 21, 7, 803–837.
[32]
Pan, Y., Frisson, S., and Jensen, O. 2021. Neural evidence for lexical parafoveal processing. Nature Communications 2021 12:1 12, 1, 1–9.
[33]
de Pisapia, N., Kaunitz, L., and Melcher, D. 2010. Backward Masking and Unmasking Across Saccadic Eye Movements. Current Biology 20, 7, 613–617.
[34]
Rayner, K., McConkie, G., and Zola, D. 1980. Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 12, 2, 206–226.
[35]
Reichle, E., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D., and Rayner, K. 1998. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 105, 1, 125–157.
[36]
Schotter, E.R., Angele, B., and Rayner, K. 2012. Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 74, 1, 5–35.
[37]
Strasburger, H. and Harvey, L.O. 1991. Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view.
[38]
Vasilev, M.R. and Angele, B. 2017. Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 24, 3, 666–689.
[39]
Watson, A.B. and Pelli, D.G. 1983. Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics 33, 2, 113–120.
[40]
White, S.J., Johnson, R.L., Liversedge, S.P., and Rayner, K. 2008. Eye Movements When Reading Transposed Text: The Importance of Word-Beginning Letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34, 5, 1261–1276.
[41]
Willenbockel, V., Sadr, J., Fiset, D., Horne, G.O., Gosselin, F., and Tanaka, J.W. 2010. Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox. Behavior Research Methods 2010 42:3 42, 3, 671–684.
[42]
Yang, J., Wang, S., Tong, X., and Rayner, K. 2012. Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading. Reading and writing 25, 5, 1031–1052.
[43]
Zang, C., Wang, Y., Bai, X., Yan, G., Drieghe, D., and Liversedge, S.P. 2016. The use of probabilistic lexicality cues for word segmentation in Chinese reading. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 69, 3, 548–560.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An early effect of the parafoveal preview on post-saccadic processing of English wordsAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics10.3758/s13414-024-02916-487:1(94-119)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ETRA '22: 2022 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
June 2022
408 pages
ISBN:9781450392525
DOI:10.1145/3517031
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 June 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Extrafoveal preview effect
  2. Face perception
  3. Gaze-contingent
  4. Saccadic eye movements

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ETRA '22

Acceptance Rates

ETRA '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 15 of 39 submissions, 38%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 137 submissions, 50%

Upcoming Conference

ETRA '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An early effect of the parafoveal preview on post-saccadic processing of English wordsAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics10.3758/s13414-024-02916-487:1(94-119)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media