Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3503823.3503890acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ASPIDA: An Observatory for Security and Privacy in the Greek e-Business Sector

Published: 22 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Modern e-business policy aims to better frame and steer progress and advancements towards a legal and security aware framework. However, a large percentage of cases neglects the adoption of good security practices, exposing customers to potential risks. In this work, we present a hybrid approach upon self-assessment, self-improvement and self-regulation motivation, offered by the observAtory for Security and PrIvacy DAta (ASPIDA) system. To address privacy and security weaknesses we monitor and analyze a set of security and privacy metrics and indicators. The evaluation of the aforementioned criteria drives an outcome in the form of a digital badge of good practices for the specific website. This digital badge is a recognition and can be used by the e-business owners as an attraction that frames the services and content they offer to the public.

References

[1]
2018. GDPR Assessment: How can I assess my Compliance?https://www.swascan.com/gdpr-assessment/
[2]
2021. The open source PIA CNIL software helps to carry out data protection impact assesment | CNIL. https://www.cnil.fr/en/open-source-pia-software-helps-carry-out-data-protection-impact-assesment
[3]
Apache. 2021. Apache HTTP Server. The Apache Software Foundation. https://httpd.apache.org/
[4]
Elisa Bertino, Lorenzo D. Martino, Federica Paci, and Anna C. Squicciarini. 2010. Web Services Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Countermeasures. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87742-4_3
[5]
Aristeidis Chatzipoulidis, Theodosios Tsiakis, and Theodoros Kargidis. 2019. A readiness assessment tool for GDPR compliance certification. Computer Fraud & Security 2019 (08 2019), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(19)30086-7
[6]
CWE. 2021. CWE - 2019 CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Errors. https://cwe.mitre.org/top25/archive/2019/2019_cwe_top25.html
[7]
ENISA. 2021. ENISA Threat Landscape through the years. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/threat-risk-management/threats-and-trends/enisa-threat-landscape
[8]
Michael Felderer, Matthias Büchler, Martin Johns, Achim D. Brucker, Ruth Breu, and Alexander Pretschner. 2016. Security Testing. In Advances in Computers. Vol. 101. Elsevier, 1–51. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065245815000649
[9]
Flask. 2021. Welcome to Flask — Flask Documentation (2.0.x). https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/2.0.x/
[10]
Google. 2021. Google safe browsing. https://developers.google.com/safe-browsing?hl=el
[11]
OWASP Headers. 2021. OWASP Secure Headers Project. https://owasp.org/www-project-secure-headers/
[12]
InfoSec. 2021. Web Security. https://infosec.mozilla.org/guidelines/web_security
[13]
Julian Jang-Jaccard and Surya Nepal. 2014. A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity. J. Comput. System Sci. 80, 5 (Aug. 2014), 973–993. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022000014000178
[14]
MariaDB. 2021. Open Source Database (RDBMS) for the Enterprise. https://mariadb.com/
[15]
Dirk Merkel. 2014. Docker: Lightweight Linux Containers for Consistent Development and Deployment. Linux J. 2014, 239, Article 2 (March 2014).
[16]
Nikto. 2021. Nikto web server scanner. https://cirt.net/Nikto2
[17]
OpenVAS. 2021. OpenVAS - Open Vulnerability Assessment Scanner. https://www.openvas.org/
[18]
OWASP. 2021. OWASP Top Ten Web Application Security Risks | OWASP. https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/
[19]
React. 2021. React – A JavaScript library for building user interfaces. https://reactjs.org/
[20]
SSLabs. 2021. SSL Server Test (Powered by Qualys SSL Labs). https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/
[21]
TestSSL. 2021. /bin/bash based SSL/TLS tester: testssl.sh. https://testssl.sh/
[22]
Vasileios Vlachos, Yannis C. Stamatiou, Adelina Madhja, and Sotiris Nikoletseas. 2017. Privacy Flag: A Crowdsourcing Platform for Reporting and Managing Privacy and Security Risks. In Proceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics (Larissa, Greece) (PCI 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 27, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139367.3139432
[23]
W3af. 2021. w3af - Open Source Web Application Security Scanner. http://w3af.org/
[24]
ZAP. 2021. The ZAP Homepage. https://www.zaproxy.org/

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Investigating Data Privacy Evaluation Criteria and Requirements for e-Commerce WebsitesAdvanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability10.1007/978-3-031-20316-9_23(297-307)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2022

Index Terms

  1. ASPIDA: An Observatory for Security and Privacy in the Greek e-Business Sector
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PCI '21: Proceedings of the 25th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
    November 2021
    499 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 February 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. cybersecurity
    2. e-business
    3. privacy
    4. web application vulnerabilities
    5. world wide web

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • Hellenic Ministry of Development and Investments

    Conference

    PCI 2021

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 390 submissions, 49%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Investigating Data Privacy Evaluation Criteria and Requirements for e-Commerce WebsitesAdvanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability10.1007/978-3-031-20316-9_23(297-307)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media