Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3500868.3559477acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Exploring the Community of Model Publishers on TensorFlow Hub

Published: 08 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

We explore the community of AI model publishers on TensorFlow Hub (TF Hub). While researchers identified the challenges AI model publishers and AI model users faced, little is known about how they interact with each other in an online community. The analysis of the metadata recorded on TF Hub revealed the models that the AI model publishers uploaded. Also, we found out how the models published by the AI model publishers were shared with other people on TF Hub. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to explore the online community of AI model publishers sharing their models with each other.

References

[1]
Tanveer Ahmed and Abhishek Srivastava. 2017. Understanding and evaluating the behavior of technical users. A study of developer interaction at StackOverflow. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences 7, 1 (2017), 1–18.
[2]
Alexei Baevski, Yuhao Zhou, Abdelrahman Mohamed, and Michael Auli. 2020. wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 12449–12460.
[3]
Carrie J Cai and Philip J Guo. 2019. Software developers learning machine learning: Motivations, hurdles, and desires. In 2019 IEEE symposium on visual languages and human-centric computing (VL/HCC). IEEE, 25–34.
[4]
Laura Dabbish, Colleen Stuart, Jason Tsay, and Jim Herbsleb. 2012. Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 1277–1286.
[5]
Graham Dove, Kim Halskov, Jodi Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2017. UX design innovation: Challenges for working with machine learning as a design material. In Proceedings of the 2017 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 278–288.
[6]
Joseph Feliciano, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Alexey Zagalsky. 2016. Student experiences using GitHub in software engineering courses: a case study. In 2016 IEEE/ACM 38th international conference on software engineering companion (ICSE-C). IEEE, 422–431.
[7]
Jort F Gemmeke, Daniel PW Ellis, Dylan Freedman, Aren Jansen, Wade Lawrence, R Channing Moore, Manoj Plakal, and Marvin Ritter. 2017. Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events. In 2017 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 776–780.
[8]
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770–778.
[9]
Andrew G Howard, Menglong Zhu, Bo Chen, Dmitry Kalenichenko, Weijun Wang, Tobias Weyand, Marco Andreetto, and Hartwig Adam. 2017. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861(2017).
[10]
Joonyoung Jun, Woosuk Seo, Jihyeon Park, Subin Park, and Hyunggu Jung. 2021. Exploring the Experiences of Streamers with Visual Impairments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2(2021), 1–23.
[11]
Tomoya Koike, Kun Qian, Qiuqiang Kong, Mark D Plumbley, Björn W Schuller, and Yoshiharu Yamamoto. 2020. Audio for audio is better? An investigation on transfer learning models for heart sound classification. In 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 74–77.
[12]
Dan Kondratyuk, Liangzhe Yuan, Yandong Li, Li Zhang, Mingxing Tan, Matthew Brown, and Boqing Gong. 2021. Movinets: Mobile video networks for efficient video recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 16020–16030.
[13]
Yubo Kou and Colin M Gray. 2018. Towards professionalization in an online community of emerging occupation: Discourses among UX practitioners. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork. 322–334.
[14]
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 25 (2012).
[15]
Jennifer Marlow, Laura Dabbish, and Jim Herbsleb. 2013. Impression formation in online peer production: activity traces and personal profiles in github. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 117–128.
[16]
Nora McDonald and Sean Goggins. 2013. Performance and participation in open source software on github. In CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 139–144.
[17]
Thorsten Müller and Dominik Kreutz. 2021. Thorsten-Voice - "Thorsten-21.02-neutral" Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5525342 Please use it to make the world a better place for whole humankind.
[18]
Thorsten Müller and Dominik Kreutz. 2021. Thorsten-Voice - "Thorsten-21.06-emotional" Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5525023 Please use it to make the world a better place for whole humankind.
[19]
Kayur Patel, James Fogarty, James A Landay, and Beverly Harrison. 2008. Investigating statistical machine learning as a tool for software development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 667–676.
[20]
David Piorkowski, Soya Park, April Yi Wang, Dakuo Wang, Michael Muller, and Felix Portnoy. 2021. How ai developers overcome communication challenges in a multidisciplinary team: A case study. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1(2021), 1–25.
[21]
Pascal Puchtler, Johannes Wirth, and René Peinl. 2021. Hui-audio-corpus-german: A high quality tts dataset. In German Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Künstliche Intelligenz). Springer, 204–216.
[22]
Woosuk Seo and Hyunggu Jung. 2017. Exploring the community of blind or visually impaired people on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 371–372.
[23]
Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556(2014).
[24]
Christoph Treude, Ohad Barzilay, and Margaret-Anne Storey. 2011. How do programmers ask and answer questions on the web?(nier track). In Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on software engineering. 804–807.
[25]
Yunxiang Xiong, Zhangyuan Meng, Beijun Shen, and Wei Yin. 2017. Mining Developer Behavior Across GitHub and StackOverflow. In SEKE. 578–583.
[26]
Qian Yang, Alex Scuito, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Aaron Steinfeld. 2018. Investigating how experienced UX designers effectively work with machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference. 585–596.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Visualizing the Carbon Intensity of Machine Learning Inference for Image Analysis on TensorFlow HubCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3584931.3606959(206-211)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW'22 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
November 2022
318 pages
ISBN:9781450391900
DOI:10.1145/3500868
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 November 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. TensorFlow Hub
  2. model publishers
  3. online communities

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

CSCW '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25
October 18 - 22, 2025
Bergen , Norway

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)76
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Visualizing the Carbon Intensity of Machine Learning Inference for Image Analysis on TensorFlow HubCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3584931.3606959(206-211)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media