Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3500868.3559450acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

The Components of Trust for Collaborating With AI Colleagues

Published: 08 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

AI technologies are capable of improving the performance and productivity of teams in a variety of work contexts. These advantages may be optimized when the AI agent is considered a full team member. A vital component of the agent’s acceptance as a team member or colleague is the degree to which its human coworkers feel they can trust it. To explore what factors affect the perceptions of an AI agent as a trustworthy team member and a legitimate colleague, we interviewed twenty-two professionals representing various work roles. Our results revealed that the following qualities contribute to professionals’ trust in AI as a colleague: a visual presence reflective of coworkers, engagement in feedback loop and team processes through human communication, and the ability for self-development. These findings contribute to the CSCW community by advancing the current understanding of human-AI teaming and informing the design of trustworthy AI agents into the workplace.

References

[1]
Tammy Bahmanziari, J Michael Pearson, and Leon Crosby. 2003. Is trust important in technology adoption? A policy capturing approach. Journal of Computer Information Systems 43, 4 (2003), 46–54.
[2]
Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Daniel Weld. 2021. Does the whole exceed its parts? the effect of ai explanations on complementary team performance. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16.
[3]
Herbert H Clark and Susan E Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication.(1991).
[4]
Myke C. Cohen, Mustafa Demir, Erin K. Chiou, and Nancy J. Cooke. 2021. The Dynamics of Trust and Verbal Anthropomorphism in Human-Autonomy Teaming. In 2021 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS). IEEE, Magdeburg, Germany, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS53169.2021.9582655
[5]
Ewart J. de Visser, Samuel S. Monfort, Ryan McKendrick, Melissa A. B. Smith, Patrick E. McKnight, Frank Krueger, and Raja Parasuraman. 2016. Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 22, 3 (Sept. 2016), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000092
[6]
Alpana Dubey, Kumar Abhinav, Sakshi Jain, Veenu Arora, and Asha Puttaveerana. 2020. HACO: a framework for developing human-AI teaming. In Proceedings of the 13th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference on Formerly known as India Software Engineering Conference. 1–9.
[7]
Mary T Dzindolet, Scott A Peterson, Regina A Pomranky, Linda G Pierce, and Hall P Beck. 2003. The role of trust in automation reliance. International journal of human-computer studies 58, 6 (2003), 697–718.
[8]
Chang Lee and Guohua Wan. 2010. Including subjective norm and technology trust in the technology acceptance model: a case of e-ticketing in China. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 41, 4(2010), 40–51.
[9]
John D Lee and Katrina A See. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors 46, 1 (2004), 50–80.
[10]
Brian Y Lim, Anind K Dey, and Daniel Avrahami. 2009. Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2119–2128.
[11]
Matthew Lombard and Theresa Ditton. 1997. At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3, 2 (Sept. 1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
[12]
Joseph A. Maxwell. 2012. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Vol. 41. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[13]
Roger C Mayer, James H Davis, and F David Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review 20, 3 (1995), 709–734.
[14]
Daniel McAllister, J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. The Academy of Management Review 38, 1 (1995), 24–59.
[15]
Nathan J McNeese, Mustafa Demir, Erin Chiou, Nancy Cooke, and Giovanni Yanikian. 2019. Understanding the Role of Trust in Human-Autonomy Teaming. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 254–263.
[16]
Nathan J. McNeese, Mustafa Demir, Erin K. Chiou, and Nancy J. Cooke. 2021. Trust and Team Performance in Human–Autonomy Teaming. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 25, 1 (Jan. 2021), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2021.1846854
[17]
Raja Parasuraman and Victor Riley. 1997. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human factors 39, 2 (1997), 230–253.
[18]
Habiba Saedon, Shizalia Salleh, Arun Balakrishnan, Christopher HE Imray, and Mahmud Saedon. 2012. The role of feedback in improving the effectiveness of workplace based assessments: a systematic review. BMC medical education 12, 1 (2012), 1–8.
[19]
Cliff Scott and Melissa Medaugh. 2017. Axial coding. The international encyclopedia of communication research methods 10(2017), 9781118901731.
[20]
Tenace Kwaku Setor. 2014. The effect of job stress on job performance amongst it professionals: The moderating role of proactive work behaviours. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM conference on Computers and people research. 17–21.
[21]
William Seymour and Max Van Kleek. 2021. Exploring Interactions Between Trust, Anthropomorphism, and Relationship Development in Voice Assistants. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 371 (oct 2021), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479515
[22]
Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1994. Grounded theory methodology: An overview.(1994).
[23]
Anna-Sophie Ulfert and Eleni Georganta. 2020. A model of team trust in human-agent teams. In Companion publication of the 2020 international conference on multimodal interaction. 171–176.
[24]
Dakuo Wang, Elizabeth Churchill, Pattie Maes, Xiangmin Fan, Ben Shneiderman, Yuanchun Shi, and Qianying Wang. 2020. From Human-Human Collaboration to Human-AI Collaboration: Designing AI Systems That Can Work Together with People. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381069
[25]
Fumeng Yang, Zhuanyi Huang, Jean Scholtz, and Dustin L Arendt. 2020. How do visual explanations foster end users’ appropriate trust in machine learning?. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 189–201.
[26]
Rui Zhang, Nathan J McNeese, Guo Freeman, and Geoff Musick. 2021. " An Ideal Human" Expectations of AI Teammates in Human-AI Teaming. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3(2021), 1–25.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Getting Along With Autonomous Teammates: Understanding the Socio-Emotional and Teaming Aspects of Trust in Human-Autonomy TeamsProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/10711813241272123Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Understanding the Evolvement of Trust Over Time within Human-AI TeamsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870608:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Role of Social Support When Integrating Generative AI in Small Business WorkflowsCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3681895(485-492)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW'22 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
November 2022
318 pages
ISBN:9781450391900
DOI:10.1145/3500868
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 November 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. autonomous teammates
  2. human-AI teaming
  3. trust

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CSCW '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)167
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Getting Along With Autonomous Teammates: Understanding the Socio-Emotional and Teaming Aspects of Trust in Human-Autonomy TeamsProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/10711813241272123Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Understanding the Evolvement of Trust Over Time within Human-AI TeamsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870608:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Role of Social Support When Integrating Generative AI in Small Business WorkflowsCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3681895(485-492)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
  • (2024)How Can I Signal You To Trust Me: Investigating AI Trust Signalling in Clinical Self-AssessmentsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661612(525-540)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Healthcare Voice AI Assistants: Factors Influencing Trust and Intention to UseProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373398:CSCW1(1-37)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Designing AI with Metaphors: Leveraging Ambiguity and Defamiliarization to Support Design CreativityProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3664250(537-541)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Towards Human-Centred AI-Co-Creation: A Three-Level Framework for Effective Collaboration between Human and AICompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3584931.3607008(312-316)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media